Hi Monica, Miguel changed the doodle and now it is clearer the intention: All the options in the doodle are for the review day, so if you mark one option as suitable/possible, then you are saying that you can attend the review meeting that day, and that you can also attend the two previous days the rehearsal meeting. Are your doodle entries consistent with this interpretation? With my votes, I tried to create a consisten view of our options at WP level. I think this is the most coherent approach. Let me know if you change your entries so that I can change my owns. Nevertheless, Friday the 10th of July seems to be the most suitable date for the review (8th and 9th for the rehearsal meeting), are you fine with these dates? Best regards, Javier 2015-05-25 23:33 GMT+02:00 Javier Soriano <jsoriano at fi.upm.es>: > Buff... we can discuss about this tomorrow during our weekly call. After > reading the recent emails from Miguel I have changed my mind and now I > think that all the days in the doodle are options for the review (and don't > form groups of three days), so if you choose one of them as available, then > you are tacitly saying that you would go for that day as the review day and > for the two previous days (including saturdays and sundays) as the > rehearsal days. Then, the best options are Wednesdays, Thursdays and > Fridays (only those for which you can attend the two previous rehearsal > days, or at least one of them). Am I wrong? > > I've just written Miguel asking for the right interpretation of the doodle > :-( > > BR, > Javier > > 2015-05-25 20:49 GMT+02:00 Monica Franceschini <monica.franceschini at eng.it > >: > >> Hi Javier, >> I've just refined my doodle entry, even if 6-8 July is no longer an >> option (and 8 for me is something I would prefer to skip). So I put >> 9-10-15...maybe I'll miss 1 day but if you came too, it won't be that >> important... >> Let me know if i suits you. >> Cheers, >> Monica >> >> *Monica Franceschini* >> Solution Architecture Manager >> >> *Big Data Competence Center Engineering Group* >> Corso Stati Uniti 23/C, 35127 Padova, Italia >> Tel: +39 049.8283547 >> Fax: +39 049.8692566 >> Twitter: @twittmonique >> www.spagobi.org - www.eng.it <http://www.eng.it/web/eng_en/home> *proud >> SpagoBI supporter and contributor* >> [image: SpagoBI] >> Respect the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you >> really need to. >> >> The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to >> which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged >> material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or >> taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or >> entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received >> this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any >> computer. >> Il 25/05/2015 12:13, Javier Soriano ha scritto: >> >> >> - >> >> Note that will need 1 or 2 days to rehearse ... maybe we do not want to >> choose a Monday, do we? I am assuming that this one is a one-d >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Fiware-apps mailing list >> Fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.org >> https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-apps >> > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-apps/attachments/20150531/569b0af9/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: spagobi.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 3639 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-apps/attachments/20150531/569b0af9/attachment.jpg> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Green.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 4716 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-apps/attachments/20150531/569b0af9/attachment-0001.jpg>
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy