Dear all, First of all, I hope you have received this mail well because it is being sent through the mailing list we have created for elaboration of the proposal. For sending mails to the mailing list, you should use the address: fiware-boost-rural at lists.fiware.org Second, we want to share a document with description of WPs and tasks <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1q1VOIREsurIQo8PRaVCTgmmBTEeOD-5p7ustT6AFBCY/edit?usp=sharing> as input for the discussion tomorrow. Some comments (and open questions we invite you to think about): * Regarding WP2: o We have to bear in mind that the cross-sector digital platform to be deployed in a given region for pilots in that region will comprise: + A number of base general-purpose platform components coming from FIWARE which can be combined with best-of-breed third-party open source components (e.g., Spark) + A number of components to be developed in the pilots which have the potential to be reused in multiple regions (with the potential to be contributed to FIWARE as a mean for sustainability beyond duration of the project) o Evolution/maintenance and support of the first group will take place in WP2 o Our proposal is that development and support of the second group will take place in WP4 (Pilots implementation) even though will be coordinated from WP. Rationale is that it will be very difficult to identify "a priori" how much of the development to be carried out by regional partners will be addressed with the intend of generate reusable components and therefore it will be difficult to estimate a priori how such partners could distribute their resources between WP4 and WP2 (where we would need to add them as partners if reusable components identified in the pilots had to be implemented in WP2). * Regarding WP3: o We proposed some tasks which were considered in projects where there was also an initial phase which had to do with participatory ideation and design of services. However, we are happy to adapt to whoever wishes to lead the WP. o Ditte: your comments are more than welcome here and if your organization wants to lead the WP it would be great as well. * Regarding WP4: o Aspects to consider are tri-dimensional: + Focus areas: Public Services, Primary Sector, New Economy, Energy, Tourism + Dimensions to consider: Economical, Socio-cultural, Legal, Educational, Technological + Actions: Spaces re-visited, Resources re-discovered, Community re-inforced, Services re-invented, Agency re-vitalizeed o However, we need to come with a list of tasks. o Beneficiaries from the Open Calls have to be incorporated, with the resources that they will get funded, in tasks of this WP so the approach of defining one tasks per region from the original consortium doesn't work. o Therefore, we see two approaches for definition of tasks: + We may consider that tasks may be linked to phases of the pilots (implementation of services, deployment, operation/validation) but then we have to figure out how we will manage the fact that some of the services will be provided by beneficiaries from the Open Calls. An option could be that once scope and concrete services for pilots have been identified in WP3, we will identify which services will be implemented by members of the original consortium (solution integrators/developers proposed as members of the original consortia) and which ones will be selected through open calls. + We simply map tasks to focus areas and describe the kind services, etc. that will be developed in each o For the time being, we have gone for the option of defining tasks per focus areas because the first option could be a bit tricky to explain, but let's discuss that tomorrow. o In any case, a task for overall coordination of the pilots is needed * Regarding WP5: o We have arrived with an initial proposal based on approach taken in similar projects o However we welcome feedback from partners interested in leading this WP: Peyman, we welcome your offering here and look forward your specific comments * Regarding WP6: o This WP will be coordinated by the FIWARE Foundation with strong support from FundingBox (Community Management). Of course active participation of partners. * Regarding WP7: o We have arrived with an initial proposal based on approach taken in similar projects. o We need someone who may lead this WP or propose partners which own credentials to carry out the tasks * Regarding WP8: o FundingBox should review the structure (which comes from another project where they were managing thee cascade funding and had precisely a WP for dealing with cascade funding) I hope this provides good food for thought in preparation of the meeting tomorrow. Cheers, -- Document Juanjo Hierro Chief Technology Officer juanjose.hierro at fiware.org <mailto:juanjose.hierro at fiware.org> www.linkedin.com/in/jhierro <https://www.linkedin.com/in/jhierro> Twitter: @fiware <https://twitter.com/fiware> @JuanjoHierro <https://twitter.com/JuanjoHierro> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-boost-rural/attachments/20200304/ff7482be/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: foundation-logo.png Type: image/png Size: 8201 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-boost-rural/attachments/20200304/ff7482be/attachment.png>
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy