Hi all, We have to discuss this issue in details. Some points are related to FIWARE internal processes (software, docs & catalogue where we are less agile than for dev and backlog) and some other to potential external resources (test of what should be not a blueprint but a software fully packaged for different OS! We have now a picture of someone who does not want to use anything aaS but wants to install everything... and a good developer able to manage configuration for Tomcat or other tools is also a "good" SME Many different points especially if everybody imagines what are the expectations of a SME... Is there only one profile of a SME? or many profiles? Last workshop in Munich has shown that there are many profiles and some would expect more technical content while other would asked for "commercial" softwares. BR Thierry -----Message d'origine----- De : fiware-wg-leaders-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [mailto:fiware-wg-leaders-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] De la part de depa at eng.it Envoyé : lundi 29 septembre 2014 06:34 À : Juanjo Hierro; fiware-chapter-leaders-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org; fiware-chapter-leaders at lists.fi-ware.org; fiware-chapter-architects at lists.fi-ware.org Cc : fiware-wg-leaders at lists.fi-ware.org Objet : [Fiware-wg-leaders] R: [Fiware-chapter-leaders] URGENT: FIWARE coordination confcall - response to technical assessment by HLRS on FIWARE GEris in the Catalogue Dear Juanjo and all, As previously told you unfortunately today i cannot attend the meeting as involved in fiware talk and planning to the general directors of engineering. So today engineering will be represented by alessandra and davide. However, although i do agree with your analysis of the situation, to me a budget of 600k is nonsense. As engineering we did already this work in fiware rel.1 and although expensive it was certainly much cheaper. I think the same, and this already a lot, can be done for 100k max. Ciao Stefano Le mail ti raggiungono ovunque con BlackBerry® from Vodafone! -----Original Message----- From: Juanjo Hierro <juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com> Sender: fiware-chapter-leaders-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 02:03:19 To: <fiware-chapter-leaders at lists.fi-ware.org>; <fiware-chapter-architects at lists.fi-ware.org> Cc: <fiware-wg-leaders at lists.fi-ware.org> Subject: [Fiware-chapter-leaders] URGENT: FIWARE coordination confcall - response to technical assessment by HLRS on FIWARE GEris in the Catalogue _______________________________________________ Fiware-chapter-leaders mailing list Fiware-chapter-leaders at lists.fi-ware.org https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-chapter-leaders _______________________________________________ Fiware-wg-leaders mailing list Fiware-wg-leaders at lists.fi-ware.org https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-wg-leaders _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you.
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy