From juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com Tue Dec 2 08:58:08 2014 From: juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 08:58:08 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] Confcall Message-ID: <547D7110.5020108@telefonica.com> Hi, Is the confcall confirmed ? What bridge to use ? I guess it is the same like the last time ... Cheers, -- Juanjo -- P.S.: Please note that my email address has changed __________________________________________________________________ FIWARE Coordinator and Chief Architect CTO of IoT and Smart Cities platform at Telef?nica email: juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro You can follow FIWARE at: website: http://www.fiware.org facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, puede contener informaci?n privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilizaci?n, divulgaci?n y/o copia sin autorizaci?n puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislaci?n vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma v?a y proceda a su destrucci?n. The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete it. Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinat?rio, pode conter informa??o privilegiada ou confidencial e ? para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se n?o ? vossa senhoria o destinat?rio indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utiliza??o, divulga??o e/ou c?pia sem autoriza??o pode estar proibida em virtude da legisla??o vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destrui??o -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Tue Dec 2 09:33:38 2014 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 09:33:38 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] Confcall In-Reply-To: <547D7110.5020108@telefonica.com> References: <547D7110.5020108@telefonica.com> Message-ID: dear juanjo and all, yes conf call confirmed. with same details powownow pin 436393. unfortunately i'm late so let's start at 10:00. (sergio we will keep it till 11:00 as you requested do not worry) thank you very much! stefano 2014-12-02 8:58 GMT+01:00 Juanjo Hierro : > Hi, > > Is the confcall confirmed ? What bridge to use ? I guess it is the > same like the last time ... > > Cheers, > > -- Juanjo > > -- > P.S.: Please note that my email address has changed > __________________________________________________________________ > > FIWARE Coordinator and Chief Architect > CTO of IoT and Smart Cities platform at Telef?nica > > email: juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > You can follow FIWARE at: > website: http://www.fiware.org > facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > > ------------------------------ > > Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, > puede contener informaci?n privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso > exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el > destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilizaci?n, > divulgaci?n y/o copia sin autorizaci?n puede estar prohibida en virtud de > la legislaci?n vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos > que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma v?a y proceda a su > destrucci?n. > > The information contained in this transmission is privileged and > confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or > entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended > recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or > copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received > this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the > sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete > it. > > Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinat?rio, > pode conter informa??o privilegiada ou confidencial e ? para uso exclusivo > da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se n?o ? vossa senhoria o destinat?rio > indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utiliza??o, divulga??o e/ou > c?pia sem autoriza??o pode estar proibida em virtude da legisla??o vigente. > Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique > imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destrui??o > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-coaches mailing list > Fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org > https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-coaches > > -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 skype: depa01 twitter: @depa01 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From franck.le-gall at eglobalmark.com Tue Dec 2 10:01:18 2014 From: franck.le-gall at eglobalmark.com (Franck Le Gall) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 09:01:18 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] Confcall In-Reply-To: References: <547D7110.5020108@telefonica.com> Message-ID: Hello Unfortunately I have another telco at 10:00 as the coache telco was initially planned to last 1 hour. Please let me know if I need to pop-in during 5 or 10 min I will put you some feedback form my FICHE evaluation on a separate e.mail Kind regards Franck De : fiware-coaches-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [mailto:fiware-coaches-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] De la part de stefano de panfilis Envoy? : mardi 2 d?cembre 2014 09:34 ? : Juanjo Hierro Cc : fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org Objet : Re: [Fiware-coaches] Confcall dear juanjo and all, yes conf call confirmed. with same details powownow pin 436393. unfortunately i'm late so let's start at 10:00. (sergio we will keep it till 11:00 as you requested do not worry) thank you very much! stefano 2014-12-02 8:58 GMT+01:00 Juanjo Hierro >: Hi, Is the confcall confirmed ? What bridge to use ? I guess it is the same like the last time ... Cheers, -- Juanjo -- P.S.: Please note that my email address has changed __________________________________________________________________ FIWARE Coordinator and Chief Architect CTO of IoT and Smart Cities platform at Telef?nica email: juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro You can follow FIWARE at: website: http://www.fiware.org facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, puede contener informaci?n privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilizaci?n, divulgaci?n y/o copia sin autorizaci?n puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislaci?n vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma v?a y proceda a su destrucci?n. The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete it. Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinat?rio, pode conter informa??o privilegiada ou confidencial e ? para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se n?o ? vossa senhoria o destinat?rio indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utiliza??o, divulga??o e/ou c?pia sem autoriza??o pode estar proibida em virtude da legisla??o vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destrui??o _______________________________________________ Fiware-coaches mailing list Fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-coaches -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 skype: depa01 twitter: @depa01 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From franck.le-gall at eglobalmark.com Tue Dec 2 10:19:24 2014 From: franck.le-gall at eglobalmark.com (Franck Le Gall) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 09:19:24 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] FICHE accelerator evaluation Message-ID: <67956a5e900d490c9a1ba41cf988b31a@winhexbeeu17.win.mail> Dear all, I finished late yesterday the FICHE phase 1 evaluation for FIWARE criteria. I got at the end 201 proposals to look at. 27 (13%) of them have been evaluated as failing the criteria and are thus eliminated from the next evaluation stage. The distribution of the evaluation is on the attached pic. I will start the FI-C3 evaluation today but in a different way (evaluating a subset of the proposals but looking at all criterias). I welcome any feedback from Coimbra discussions Kind regards Franck -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image.png Type: image/png Size: 7222 bytes Desc: image.png URL: From juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com Tue Dec 2 10:49:30 2014 From: juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 10:49:30 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] Agenda of the bootcamp Message-ID: <547D8B2A.6000305@telefonica.com> Hi, Here you have the agenda of the bootcamp we are going to run next week in Paris https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1H40I6JDfuuRDxs9rQgP6B5myOPu39DyHkkoIKhX71-0/edit?usp=sharing Cheers, -- Juanjo -- P.S.: Please note that my email address has changed __________________________________________________________________ FIWARE Coordinator and Chief Architect CTO of IoT and Smart Cities platform at Telef?nica email: juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro You can follow FIWARE at: website: http://www.fiware.org facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, puede contener informaci?n privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilizaci?n, divulgaci?n y/o copia sin autorizaci?n puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislaci?n vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma v?a y proceda a su destrucci?n. The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete it. Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinat?rio, pode conter informa??o privilegiada ou confidencial e ? para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se n?o ? vossa senhoria o destinat?rio indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utiliza??o, divulga??o e/ou c?pia sem autoriza??o pode estar proibida em virtude da legisla??o vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destrui??o -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Tue Dec 2 20:06:41 2014 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 20:06:41 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] minutes of the today call + fiware evaluation criteria slides Message-ID: dear all, as per subject. instead of this evening i'll send the spreadsheet tomorrow after having get all your comments on the criteria. ciao, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 skype: depa01 twitter: @depa01 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: coaches_team_minutes_20141202.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 43828 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Accelerators proposals evaluations_v2.pptx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentation Size: 300122 bytes Desc: not available URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Tue Dec 2 20:12:26 2014 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 20:12:26 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] FICHE accelerator evaluation In-Reply-To: <67956a5e900d490c9a1ba41cf988b31a@winhexbeeu17.win.mail> References: <67956a5e900d490c9a1ba41cf988b31a@winhexbeeu17.win.mail> Message-ID: dear frank, apparently in your evaluation there are about 100 proposals that are good (>2) this is a good sign of understanding our ideas. points from coimbra in the minutes i shared few minutes ago. ciao, stefano 2014-12-02 10:19 GMT+01:00 Franck Le Gall : > Dear all, > > > > I finished late yesterday the FICHE phase 1 evaluation for FIWARE criteria. > > > > I got at the end 201 proposals to look at. > > > > 27 (13%) of them have been evaluated as failing the criteria and are thus > eliminated from the next evaluation stage. The distribution of the > evaluation is on the attached pic. > > > > I will start the FI-C3 evaluation today but in a different way (evaluating > a subset of the proposals but looking at all criterias). > > > > I welcome any feedback from Coimbra discussions > > > > Kind regards > > Franck > -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 skype: depa01 twitter: @depa01 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From silvio.cretti at create-net.org Wed Dec 3 00:18:27 2014 From: silvio.cretti at create-net.org (silvio.cretti at create-net.org) Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 00:18:27 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] minutes of the today call + fiware evaluation criteria slides In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <547E48C3.5040304@create-net.org> Dear Stefano, all thanks for the minutes and the criteria. Apologise but today I didn't attend the telco because I had another telco at the same time I had to chair. Regarding the criteria I am quited concerned about the 5th one. This appear to me to be "qualitative" with respect to the other ones related to the rapid screening: how can we measure the hidden value of FIWARE? Almost every proposal can provide a context where there is a hidden value of FIWARE but measuring it is quite difficult. How can we rank the proposals? As far as I know providing a FIWARE architecture is exactly what we asked in the first 4 criteria to the proposal writers. Why now changing the point of view? Moreover it appears that this criterium supersedes the others and this appears to me to be unfair with repsect to the proposal well written with already a good "FIWARE" architecture inside. Last but not least: in CreatiFI we are in the middle of the evaluation of the proposals so adding now this criterium is disruptive. As an alternative why don't say that the proposals should be evaluated first of all from the business idea/impact point of view and among the ones selected in this way we can apply the first four criteria just in order to rank them. It appears to me to be more quantitative and in line with what we did in the past. Best regards silvio On 12/02/14 20:06, stefano de panfilis wrote: > dear all, > > as per subject. > instead of this evening i'll send the spreadsheet tomorrow after > having get all your comments on the criteria. > > ciao, > stefano > > -- > Stefano De Panfilis > Chief Innovation Officer > Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. > via Riccardo Morandi 32 > 00148 Roma > Italy > > tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 > tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 > fax: +39-068307-4200 > cell: +39-335-7542-567 > skype: depa01 > twitter: @depa01 > > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-coaches mailing list > Fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org > https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-coaches -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From consoft-fiwarecoach at consoft.it Wed Dec 10 12:31:20 2014 From: consoft-fiwarecoach at consoft.it (consoft-fiwarecoach at consoft.it) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 11:31:20 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] fi-lab problematics Message-ID: Dear all, Good morning; I'm Marco Terrinoni, FIWARE Coach from Consoft, I'm following the accelerators from CEED Tech project. First of all let me thank you for all the useful information regarding the proposed evaluations methods and the minutes from the previous calls. I would like to expose a couple of problems I'm facing regarding the usage of FI-Lab and the various GEs on it, exposed by people from CEED Tech project. The first is related to the "Terms and Conditions" of FI-Lab: as we know, the platform can be used only for non-commercial purposes, which is a little bit controversial if we think about the nature of the Acceleration Programme. The second is still related to FI-Lab but more in terms of availability and usability of the platform: people from CEED Tech denounces a kind of "buggy" status of FI-Lab and GEs in the catalogue, and they say that they are skeptics in exposing such FIWARE technologies. Here's a section of the e-mail I just received this morning: "I completely understand that the use of these tools needs to be advertised (that is the whole point of this programme), but what is important to understand is that we are in the business of supporting young enterprises. Therefore we cannot suggest faulty technologies to them. They should be spending their time on developing their business [...] not developing FIWARE or trying to get it to work. FIWARE should be the tool that it is advertised to be [...] useful. If the GEs turn out to be ridden with bugs then this needs to be reported and fixed before they can be deployed within business situations." In particular: after a FIWARE workshop occurred in Budapest a week ago, the general feedback they have is that "the whole platform is still very much under construction"; in addition they ask if is possible to have a list of GEs that is fully developed (better functionalities with less bugs). Of course I'm trying to mitigate such situation but I would like to have some feedbacks from you. What can we do, as coaches, in this kind of situation? Is there an "official suggestion" to give to accelerators in order to promote FIWARE Technologies (e.g., FI-Lab, GEs)? Next week I will have a webinar about general aspects of FIWARE and related potentials, and I'm sure a lot of questions regarding those aspects will be asked. Concluding, back to evaluation: from CEED Tech they told me that the evaluation proposals seems to be too much restrictive for their environment, suggesting to be more "flexible" (e.g., the limitation to one single GE is acceptable without any problem). Next Friday I will have a call with CEED Tech evaluators, in which evaluation methods will be discussed; except for the rule of FIWARE technology usage (enablers), do we have any other "unbreakable" constraint? Thanks a lot for your attention. Best regards, Marco Terrinoni Marco Terrinoni Consoft Sistemi s.p.a. BU Application Via Pio VII 127 - 10127 - Torino Tel (+39) 011 3161571 Fax (+39) 011 3161583 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From thierry.nagellen at orange.com Wed Dec 10 12:59:21 2014 From: thierry.nagellen at orange.com (thierry.nagellen at orange.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 11:59:21 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] fi-lab problematics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <14267_1418212763_5488359A_14267_232_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C25511B@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> Hi Marco, Some general answers that the other coaches could also complete: 1. Yes the assumption to be FIWARE accelerator is to promote FIWARE technologies and to integrate them to do some new businesses; 2. FIWARE team is in support of the SMEs and startups which have to use our technologies. If there are some bugs and we will not say the opposite, have they submitted a ticket so we could solve them? I'm really not sure of that and being in the hackaton in Rennes in the middle of November, I did not have the same feedback from SMEs and students so maybe we have also to split the problems between what is related to FIWARE Lab (accessibility concerns) and what is related to GEs. So again, before asking the list of the best GEs, could they provide the one which did not work, so we could check the tickets and their status. 3. It is part of the 3rd phase to define where are the commercial platforms SMEs and startups will use if there are successful in their development. So CEED has to keep in mind that they are part of the programme now and have also to contribute to this part. They could also propose to have a commercial FIWARE node they want to instantiate to do their own business. There are not here just to distribute money to nice startups. 4. Regarding the use of one or more GE, the use of 1 GE is acceptable if it is clearly explained from a technical point of view (how it fit in the architecture of the service) and from a business point of view (what is the added value). Typically Cosmos, the big data GE is one of them which could help startup to sue big data technologies easily and give them a kind of competitive advantage. But in addition some other Accelerators have also pushed Specific Enablers from FI-Star, FI-Content or FIT-Man and try to say if you are using these SE, you are on line with the programme. I have personally explained to European Piooners, but also FI-C3 that this is not the target and that the rules for the use of these Specific Enablers are totally unclear, sometimes documentation is not available, and that nobody is able to evaluate if they could really be used because these projects do not provide technical coaches to evaluate the proposals. I have mentioned this concern to EC (Peter Fatelnig) especially because of FI-Star which currently would not provide access to the SE if you have not signed the Collaboration Agreement (and SMEs will never sign that) and second they proposed technical support only till the end of the project, so autumn 2015, in the middle of phase 3. So in conclusion, yes we are not in a commercial status but they were aware of that while submitting their proposal and we have a common challenge to progress together to have a market adoption of the most relevant FIWARE technologies. Anyone who detects a business opportunity can launch its own business including FIWARE Accelerators and they will have the full support of FIWARE. And trying to be more professional, we have put in place some processus like for other communities or professional services and they can ask support, so they have to use these channels to improve what could be current weak points. BR Thierry De : fiware-coaches-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [mailto:fiware-coaches-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] De la part de consoft-fiwarecoach at consoft.it Envoy? : mercredi 10 d?cembre 2014 12:31 ? : fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org Objet : [Fiware-coaches] fi-lab problematics Dear all, Good morning; I'm Marco Terrinoni, FIWARE Coach from Consoft, I'm following the accelerators from CEED Tech project. First of all let me thank you for all the useful information regarding the proposed evaluations methods and the minutes from the previous calls. I would like to expose a couple of problems I'm facing regarding the usage of FI-Lab and the various GEs on it, exposed by people from CEED Tech project. The first is related to the "Terms and Conditions" of FI-Lab: as we know, the platform can be used only for non-commercial purposes, which is a little bit controversial if we think about the nature of the Acceleration Programme. The second is still related to FI-Lab but more in terms of availability and usability of the platform: people from CEED Tech denounces a kind of "buggy" status of FI-Lab and GEs in the catalogue, and they say that they are skeptics in exposing such FIWARE technologies. Here's a section of the e-mail I just received this morning: "I completely understand that the use of these tools needs to be advertised (that is the whole point of this programme), but what is important to understand is that we are in the business of supporting young enterprises. Therefore we cannot suggest faulty technologies to them. They should be spending their time on developing their business [...] not developing FIWARE or trying to get it to work. FIWARE should be the tool that it is advertised to be [...] useful. If the GEs turn out to be ridden with bugs then this needs to be reported and fixed before they can be deployed within business situations." In particular: after a FIWARE workshop occurred in Budapest a week ago, the general feedback they have is that "the whole platform is still very much under construction"; in addition they ask if is possible to have a list of GEs that is fully developed (better functionalities with less bugs). Of course I'm trying to mitigate such situation but I would like to have some feedbacks from you. What can we do, as coaches, in this kind of situation? Is there an "official suggestion" to give to accelerators in order to promote FIWARE Technologies (e.g., FI-Lab, GEs)? Next week I will have a webinar about general aspects of FIWARE and related potentials, and I'm sure a lot of questions regarding those aspects will be asked. Concluding, back to evaluation: from CEED Tech they told me that the evaluation proposals seems to be too much restrictive for their environment, suggesting to be more "flexible" (e.g., the limitation to one single GE is acceptable without any problem). Next Friday I will have a call with CEED Tech evaluators, in which evaluation methods will be discussed; except for the rule of FIWARE technology usage (enablers), do we have any other "unbreakable" constraint? Thanks a lot for your attention. Best regards, Marco Terrinoni Marco Terrinoni Consoft Sistemi s.p.a. BU Application Via Pio VII 127 - 10127 - Torino Tel (+39) 011 3161571 Fax (+39) 011 3161583 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ilknur.chulani at atos.net Wed Dec 10 15:10:22 2014 From: ilknur.chulani at atos.net (Chulani, Ilknur) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 14:10:22 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] minutes of the today call + fiware evaluation criteria slides In-Reply-To: <547E48C3.5040304@create-net.org> References: <547E48C3.5040304@create-net.org> Message-ID: Dear all, I have a concern/question similar to Silvio?s. Some of the accelerator projects are about to complete their evaluation process soon, and adding this criterion now might be disruptive. For instance SmartAgriFood and FI-Adopt are about to complete their evaluation process in the next few days, without involvement from the FI-WARE coaches. At this point, do we still need to interrupt their process, and impose ourselves? (i.e. either by adding this criteria or by adding the step for us to approve their evaluations) Or do we let this round of evaluations go without interference from us, but set the ground rules for the next calls they might have? Best regards, ilknur From: fiware-coaches-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [mailto:fiware-coaches-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] On Behalf Of silvio.cretti at create-net.org Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 1:18 AM To: stefano de panfilis; fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org Subject: Re: [Fiware-coaches] minutes of the today call + fiware evaluation criteria slides Dear Stefano, all thanks for the minutes and the criteria. Apologise but today I didn't attend the telco because I had another telco at the same time I had to chair. Regarding the criteria I am quited concerned about the 5th one. This appear to me to be "qualitative" with respect to the other ones related to the rapid screening: how can we measure the hidden value of FIWARE? Almost every proposal can provide a context where there is a hidden value of FIWARE but measuring it is quite difficult. How can we rank the proposals? As far as I know providing a FIWARE architecture is exactly what we asked in the first 4 criteria to the proposal writers. Why now changing the point of view? Moreover it appears that this criterium supersedes the others and this appears to me to be unfair with repsect to the proposal well written with already a good "FIWARE" architecture inside. Last but not least: in CreatiFI we are in the middle of the evaluation of the proposals so adding now this criterium is disruptive. As an alternative why don't say that the proposals should be evaluated first of all from the business idea/impact point of view and among the ones selected in this way we can apply the first four criteria just in order to rank them. It appears to me to be more quantitative and in line with what we did in the past. Best regards silvio On 12/02/14 20:06, stefano de panfilis wrote: dear all, as per subject. instead of this evening i'll send the spreadsheet tomorrow after having get all your comments on the criteria. ciao, stefano -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 skype: depa01 twitter: @depa01 _______________________________________________ Fiware-coaches mailing list Fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-coaches Bu mesaj ve ekleri g?nderilen ki?iye ?zeldir ve gizli bilgiler i?erebilir. E?er mesaj?n g?nderilmek istendi?i ki?i de?ilseniz l?tfen kopyalamay?n?z, ba?kalar?na g?ndermeyiniz ve g?ndericiyi bilgilendiriniz. Internet ?zerinden g?nderilen mesajlar?n g?venli ve hatas?z oldu?unun garantisi olmad???ndan Atos grubu mesaj?n i?eri?inden sorumlu tutulamaz. G?ndericinin bilgisayar? anti-vir?s sistemleri taraf?ndan taranmaktad?r, ancak yine de mesaj?n vir?s i?ermedi?i garanti edilemez ve g?nderici, meydana gelebilecek zararlardan sorumlu tutulamaz. This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavors to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ilknur.chulani at atos.net Fri Dec 12 10:03:18 2014 From: ilknur.chulani at atos.net (Chulani, Ilknur) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 09:03:18 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] Problem with streaming of bootcamp today Message-ID: Hi all, Are any of you present at the bootcamp event in Paris today? There seems to be a problem with the streaming of the bootcamp sessions, which some accelerator projects were planning to follow. I have tried to reach Susanna Avesta and David Garcia, but no responses yet, maybe they are not able to check their emails during the event. Could you kindly let anyone from ICTlabs know in case they are not aware of the problem? Thanks in advance & best regards, ilknur ?lknur Chulani Technical Lead Research & Innovation ilknur.chulani at atos.net T +90 212 286 4666 ITU ARI-2 Teknokent B Blok K4 34398 Maslak, Istanbul, Turkey www.atosresearch.eu www.atos.net [cid:image002.png at 01CFE2E5.8B76CA80] Bu mesaj ve ekleri g?nderilen ki?iye ?zeldir ve gizli bilgiler i?erebilir. E?er mesajyn g?nderilmek istendi?i ki?i de?ilseniz l?tfen kopyalamayynyz, ba?kalaryna g?ndermeyiniz ve g?ndericiyi bilgilendiriniz. Internet ?zerinden g?nderilen mesajlaryn g?venli ve hatasyz oldu?unun garantisi olmady?yndan Atos grubu mesajyn i?eri?inden sorumlu tutulamaz. G?ndericinin bilgisayary anti-vir?s sistemleri tarafyndan taranmaktadyr, ancak yine de mesajyn vir?s i?ermedi?i garanti edilemez ve g?nderici, meydana gelebilecek zararlardan sorumlu tutulamaz. This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavors to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) 1.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 907 bytes Desc: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) 1.jpg URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) 2.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 4286 bytes Desc: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) 2.jpg URL: From sergio.garciagomez at telefonica.com Fri Dec 12 10:22:01 2014 From: sergio.garciagomez at telefonica.com (SERGIO GARCIA GOMEZ) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 09:22:01 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] Problem with streaming of bootcamp today In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Ilknur, I think it has been set up, could you check? Anyway, in a while we are moving to another room where the streaming (only audio + slides) is also working. Best Regards, Sergio. De: fiware-coaches-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [mailto:fiware-coaches-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] En nombre de Chulani, Ilknur Enviado el: viernes, 12 de diciembre de 2014 10:03 Para: fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org Asunto: [Fiware-coaches] Problem with streaming of bootcamp today Hi all, Are any of you present at the bootcamp event in Paris today? There seems to be a problem with the streaming of the bootcamp sessions, which some accelerator projects were planning to follow. I have tried to reach Susanna Avesta and David Garcia, but no responses yet, maybe they are not able to check their emails during the event. Could you kindly let anyone from ICTlabs know in case they are not aware of the problem? Thanks in advance & best regards, ilknur ?lknur Chulani Technical Lead Research & Innovation ilknur.chulani at atos.net T +90 212 286 4666 ITU ARI-2 Teknokent B Blok K4 34398 Maslak, Istanbul, Turkey www.atosresearch.eu www.atos.net [cid:image002.png at 01CFE2E5.8B76CA80] [cid:image002.jpg at 01D015F5.76D473F0] Bu mesaj ve ekleri g?nderilen ki?iye ?zeldir ve gizli bilgiler i?erebilir. E?er mesaj?n g?nderilmek istendi?i ki?i de?ilseniz l?tfen kopyalamay?n?z, ba?kalar?na g?ndermeyiniz ve g?ndericiyi bilgilendiriniz. Internet ?zerinden g?nderilen mesajlar?n g?venli ve hatas?z oldu?unun garantisi olmad???ndan Atos grubu mesaj?n i?eri?inden sorumlu tutulamaz. G?ndericinin bilgisayar? anti-vir?s sistemleri taraf?ndan taranmaktad?r, ancak yine de mesaj?n vir?s i?ermedi?i garanti edilemez ve g?nderici, meydana gelebilecek zararlardan sorumlu tutulamaz. This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavors to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. ________________________________ Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, puede contener informaci?n privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilizaci?n, divulgaci?n y/o copia sin autorizaci?n puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislaci?n vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma v?a y proceda a su destrucci?n. The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete it. Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinat?rio, pode conter informa??o privilegiada ou confidencial e ? para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se n?o ? vossa senhoria o destinat?rio indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utiliza??o, divulga??o e/ou c?pia sem autoriza??o pode estar proibida em virtude da legisla??o vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destrui??o -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 907 bytes Desc: image001.jpg URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 4286 bytes Desc: image002.jpg URL: From ilknur.chulani at atos.net Fri Dec 12 10:27:24 2014 From: ilknur.chulani at atos.net (Chulani, Ilknur) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 09:27:24 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] Problem with streaming of bootcamp today In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thanks very much Sergio, Now we can get some content, although some Spanish voice over is happening from user Raul ? Will it be the same connection details in the other room? Thanks, ilknur From: SERGIO GARCIA GOMEZ [mailto:sergio.garciagomez at telefonica.com] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 11:22 AM To: Chulani, Ilknur; fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org Subject: RE: Problem with streaming of bootcamp today Hi Ilknur, I think it has been set up, could you check? Anyway, in a while we are moving to another room where the streaming (only audio + slides) is also working. Best Regards, Sergio. De: fiware-coaches-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [mailto:fiware-coaches-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] En nombre de Chulani, Ilknur Enviado el: viernes, 12 de diciembre de 2014 10:03 Para: fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org Asunto: [Fiware-coaches] Problem with streaming of bootcamp today Hi all, Are any of you present at the bootcamp event in Paris today? There seems to be a problem with the streaming of the bootcamp sessions, which some accelerator projects were planning to follow. I have tried to reach Susanna Avesta and David Garcia, but no responses yet, maybe they are not able to check their emails during the event. Could you kindly let anyone from ICTlabs know in case they are not aware of the problem? Thanks in advance & best regards, ilknur ?lknur Chulani Technical Lead Research & Innovation ilknur.chulani at atos.net T +90 212 286 4666 ITU ARI-2 Teknokent B Blok K4 34398 Maslak, Istanbul, Turkey www.atosresearch.eu www.atos.net [cid:image002.png at 01CFE2E5.8B76CA80] [cid:image002.jpg at 01D015FE.991633F0] Bu mesaj ve ekleri g?nderilen ki?iye ?zeldir ve gizli bilgiler i?erebilir. E?er mesaj?n g?nderilmek istendi?i ki?i de?ilseniz l?tfen kopyalamay?n?z, ba?kalar?na g?ndermeyiniz ve g?ndericiyi bilgilendiriniz. Internet ?zerinden g?nderilen mesajlar?n g?venli ve hatas?z oldu?unun garantisi olmad???ndan Atos grubu mesaj?n i?eri?inden sorumlu tutulamaz. G?ndericinin bilgisayar? anti-vir?s sistemleri taraf?ndan taranmaktad?r, ancak yine de mesaj?n vir?s i?ermedi?i garanti edilemez ve g?nderici, meydana gelebilecek zararlardan sorumlu tutulamaz. This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavors to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. ________________________________ Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, puede contener informaci?n privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilizaci?n, divulgaci?n y/o copia sin autorizaci?n puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislaci?n vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma v?a y proceda a su destrucci?n. The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete it. Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinat?rio, pode conter informa??o privilegiada ou confidencial e ? para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se n?o ? vossa senhoria o destinat?rio indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utiliza??o, divulga??o e/ou c?pia sem autoriza??o pode estar proibida em virtude da legisla??o vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destrui??o Bu mesaj ve ekleri g?nderilen ki?iye ?zeldir ve gizli bilgiler i?erebilir. E?er mesaj?n g?nderilmek istendi?i ki?i de?ilseniz l?tfen kopyalamay?n?z, ba?kalar?na g?ndermeyiniz ve g?ndericiyi bilgilendiriniz. Internet ?zerinden g?nderilen mesajlar?n g?venli ve hatas?z oldu?unun garantisi olmad???ndan Atos grubu mesaj?n i?eri?inden sorumlu tutulamaz. G?ndericinin bilgisayar? anti-vir?s sistemleri taraf?ndan taranmaktad?r, ancak yine de mesaj?n vir?s i?ermedi?i garanti edilemez ve g?nderici, meydana gelebilecek zararlardan sorumlu tutulamaz. This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavors to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 907 bytes Desc: image001.jpg URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 4286 bytes Desc: image002.jpg URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Fri Dec 12 11:27:20 2014 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 11:27:20 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] minutes of the today call + fiware evaluation criteria slides In-Reply-To: References: <547E48C3.5040304@create-net.org> Message-ID: dear ilknur, regrdless you want to push for the criterion 5, anyway, as agreed and told to everybody, we are the responsibles for the fiware part evalutaion. so, somehow yes, you have to approuve evaluations made by external experts for what concerns the fiware part. however, there is no need to review all of them, but only those who seems to you to be outliers :-) ciao, stefano 2014-12-10 15:10 GMT+01:00 Chulani, Ilknur : > > Dear all, > > > > I have a concern/question similar to Silvio?s. Some of the accelerator > projects are about to complete their evaluation process soon, and adding > this criterion now might be disruptive. > > > > For instance SmartAgriFood and FI-Adopt are about to complete their > evaluation process in the next few days, without involvement from the > FI-WARE coaches. At this point, do we still need to interrupt their > process, and impose ourselves? (i.e. either by adding this criteria or by > adding the step for us to approve their evaluations) Or do we let this > round of evaluations go without interference from us, but set the ground > rules for the next calls they might have? > > > > Best regards, > > > > ilknur > > > > *From:* fiware-coaches-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [mailto: > fiware-coaches-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] *On Behalf Of * > silvio.cretti at create-net.org > *Sent:* Wednesday, December 03, 2014 1:18 AM > *To:* stefano de panfilis; fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org > *Subject:* Re: [Fiware-coaches] minutes of the today call + fiware > evaluation criteria slides > > > > Dear Stefano, all > thanks for the minutes and the criteria. > Apologise but today I didn't attend the telco because I had another telco > at the same time I had to chair. > Regarding the criteria I am quited concerned about the 5th one. > This appear to me to be "qualitative" with respect to the other ones > related to the rapid screening: how can we measure the hidden value of > FIWARE? Almost every proposal can provide a context where there is a hidden > value of FIWARE but measuring it is quite difficult. How can we rank the > proposals? As far as I know providing a FIWARE architecture is exactly what > we asked in the first 4 criteria to the proposal writers. Why now changing > the point of view? > Moreover it appears that this criterium supersedes the others and this > appears to me to be unfair with repsect to the proposal well written with > already a good "FIWARE" architecture inside. > Last but not least: in CreatiFI we are in the middle of the evaluation of > the proposals so adding now this criterium is disruptive. > As an alternative why don't say that the proposals should be evaluated > first of all from the business idea/impact point of view and among the ones > selected in this way we can apply the first four criteria just in order to > rank them. It appears to me to be more quantitative and in line with what > we did in the past. > Best regards > silvio > > On 12/02/14 20:06, stefano de panfilis wrote: > > dear all, > > > > as per subject. > > instead of this evening i'll send the spreadsheet tomorrow after having > get all your comments on the criteria. > > > > ciao, > > stefano > > > > -- > > Stefano De Panfilis > Chief Innovation Officer > Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. > via Riccardo Morandi 32 > 00148 Roma > Italy > > tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 > tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 > fax: +39-068307-4200 > cell: +39-335-7542-567 > > skype: depa01 > > twitter: @depa01 > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Fiware-coaches mailing list > > Fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org > > https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-coaches > > > Bu mesaj ve ekleri g?nderilen ki?iye ?zeldir ve gizli bilgiler > i?erebilir. E?er mesaj?n g?nderilmek istendi?i ki?i de?ilseniz l?tfen > kopyalamay?n?z, ba?kalar?na g?ndermeyiniz ve g?ndericiyi bilgilendiriniz. > Internet ?zerinden g?nderilen mesajlar?n g?venli ve hatas?z oldu?unun > garantisi olmad???ndan Atos grubu mesaj?n i?eri?inden sorumlu tutulamaz. > G?ndericinin bilgisayar? anti-vir?s sistemleri taraf?ndan taranmaktad?r, > ancak yine de mesaj?n vir?s i?ermedi?i garanti edilemez ve g?nderici, > meydana gelebilecek zararlardan sorumlu tutulamaz. > > This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended > solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this > e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As > its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability > cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavors > to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that > this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages > resulting from any virus transmitted. > -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 skype: depa01 twitter: @depa01 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ilknur.chulani at atos.net Mon Dec 15 15:52:34 2014 From: ilknur.chulani at atos.net (Chulani, Ilknur) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 14:52:34 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] Your availability in the next two weeks Message-ID: Dear Fiware coaches, Will any of you be in the office next week or the following week? I will be receiving some proposals from the SmartAgriFood project towards the end of this week, so I would like to see if anyone would be around in case I have any questions on the FIWARE criteria or need a second set of eyes to double check a grey area, etc.. Best regards, ilknur ?lknur Chulani Technical Lead Research & Innovation ilknur.chulani at atos.net T +90 212 286 4666 ITU ARI-2 Teknokent B Blok K4 34398 Maslak, Istanbul, Turkey www.atosresearch.eu www.atos.net [cid:image002.png at 01CFE2E5.8B76CA80] Bu mesaj ve ekleri g?nderilen ki?iye ?zeldir ve gizli bilgiler i?erebilir. E?er mesajyn g?nderilmek istendi?i ki?i de?ilseniz l?tfen kopyalamayynyz, ba?kalaryna g?ndermeyiniz ve g?ndericiyi bilgilendiriniz. Internet ?zerinden g?nderilen mesajlaryn g?venli ve hatasyz oldu?unun garantisi olmady?yndan Atos grubu mesajyn i?eri?inden sorumlu tutulamaz. G?ndericinin bilgisayary anti-vir?s sistemleri tarafyndan taranmaktadyr, ancak yine de mesajyn vir?s i?ermedi?i garanti edilemez ve g?nderici, meydana gelebilecek zararlardan sorumlu tutulamaz. This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavors to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) 1.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 907 bytes Desc: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) 1.jpg URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) 2.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 4234 bytes Desc: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) 2.jpg URL: From ilknur.chulani at atos.net Tue Dec 23 14:31:03 2014 From: ilknur.chulani at atos.net (Chulani, Ilknur) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 13:31:03 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] Question on conflict of interest criteria Message-ID: Dear Fi-ware coaches, I am reviewing the FIWARE criteria scoring the evaluators gave on the short listed proposals for one of the accelerators, and I have a question not about FIWARE criteria, but about conflict of interest conditions. Do you think it would be a conflict of interest if someone from the accelerator consortium is included also as a staff member for one of the proposals submitted to the same accelerator? Thanks in advance for your replies, ilknur ?lknur Chulani Technical Lead Research & Innovation ilknur.chulani at atos.net T +90 212 286 4666 ITU ARI-2 Teknokent B Blok K4 34398 Maslak, Istanbul, Turkey www.atosresearch.eu www.atos.net [cid:image002.png at 01CFE2E5.8B76CA80] Bu mesaj ve ekleri g?nderilen ki?iye ?zeldir ve gizli bilgiler i?erebilir. E?er mesajyn g?nderilmek istendi?i ki?i de?ilseniz l?tfen kopyalamayynyz, ba?kalaryna g?ndermeyiniz ve g?ndericiyi bilgilendiriniz. Internet ?zerinden g?nderilen mesajlaryn g?venli ve hatasyz oldu?unun garantisi olmady?yndan Atos grubu mesajyn i?eri?inden sorumlu tutulamaz. G?ndericinin bilgisayary anti-vir?s sistemleri tarafyndan taranmaktadyr, ancak yine de mesajyn vir?s i?ermedi?i garanti edilemez ve g?nderici, meydana gelebilecek zararlardan sorumlu tutulamaz. This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavors to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) 1.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 907 bytes Desc: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) 1.jpg URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) 2.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 4234 bytes Desc: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) 2.jpg URL: