Thanks Angeles, so just to recap: 1) for the moment we forget the Pablo's form and guidelines posted on basecamp for the technical part. We assume that you will contact us in the future when it is needed to review and fill it in. 2) we, as coaches, have to fill in the first link posted by Juanjo based in the results and documentation collected from the survey. 3) the second link posted by Juanjo will instead be filled in automatically by the answers to the survey provided by the SMEs. Is all this correct? If yes I am a bit concerned about the date of September 3rd to finish the evaluation: I understood that this should be based on the info collected during the survey and we will have access to this info not before September 1st. Then the date of September 3rd is a bit too much aggressive. Thanks and best regards, silvio On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Angeles Tejado <angeles.tejado at ogilvy.com> wrote: > Hello Silvio. > > > 2.5) We, as coaches, should probably be contacted by our accelerator > program in order to provide this evaluation. Am I wrong? For the moment I > didn't receive anything from my accelerator (CreatiFI) > > > Accelerators are sending business assessment to the Press Office. We are > the ones that should receive *both *assessments for a final review in > terms of communication. Obviously, we will recap all the information and > share with the community. We are also in contact with accelerators from a > business side and with Juanjo for a recap on the technical side. > > > However, it's expected from coaches to be in contact with their > accelerator... > > > 1) What is the FIWARE usage assessment score card you are referring to? Is > it the one that has been posted by Pablo in Bsaecamp for the technical > part? > > > I don't think that Juanjo refers to the subgrantee appraisal form shared > by Pablo. The final score card is the first link that Juanjo have shared in > his email below > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Dijrn2gUsU0-dPhVqE9RXKi6MKkLnBVn_3YUEQWvCSs/edit?usp=sharing - Final > FIWARE Usage Assessment Scorecard (by coaches and FIWARE experts) > > > *After *your final tech assessment (following the guidelines that Juanjo > has sent and using the score cards that he has sent) we (press office) need > to highlight the different aspects that could be of interest from a > communication perspective. And this is the content of the appraisal form > shared by Pablo... We will need you to fill in Pablo's form after the whole > tech assesmment has finished (this is to "translate it" into a more > understandable language). > > > Having said that... The answers to the rest of your questions should be: > > > 2.0) Are we going to use the survey result to fill in that (Pablo's) score > card? NO. > 2.1) Do we have to evaluate only the SME selected by the business > evaluation as the guidelines are stating? NO. Your tech evaluation is > independent... You must review all the SMES asigned to the accelerators you > are coaching. Press Office will check the business results with tech > results and match them (if bussiness results and tech results do not > match... we will analyze and maybe come back to coaches to review business > cases that have not been selected from a tech perspective and same with the > accelerators for the tech succes cases that do not have good results in > terms of business... this is our work) > 2.2) That form refers to some KPI. Which ones are to be considered? I > will check with Pablo... maybe you, as coachers, can help us to define KPIs > that, obviously, will have something to be with the different categories > you are evaluating in the score card. > 2.3) That form refers to a "technical excellence rating": how can we > determine this? I suppose We should work on it with Juanjo... after the > assessment is finished. > 2.4) How can we guarantee to provide a uniform rate across the different > accelerators/evaluators? Same as 2.3 > > 3) if the answer to the question 2 is no, then which is the score card to > be filled in? The one above and added by you on 4/ :) > 4) regarding to our score card ( > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Dijrn2gUsU0-dPhVqE9RXKi6MKkLnBVn_3YUEQWvCSs/edit?usp=sharing) > my fieeling is that it will be filled in automatially/or almost > automatically by the survey tool. Am I wrong? The one which is filled in > automatically is this one (the second that Juanjo has shared in his email) > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1J8qACLN0MjuMIPY-XVdkhZbvGMPASA70IqxxLyNIg3s/edit?usp=sharing > > > Let me know if this makes sense for you (hope that Juanjo will take a look > at this - I hope not to be wrong) > > > Kind regards. > > > Angeles Tejado > FIWARE Press Office > OgilvyOne Worldwide Madrid > Office: +34-91-4512179 > Cell: +34-608508873 > E-mail: angeles.tejado at ogilvy.com > > > ------------------------------ > *De:* Silvio Cretti <silvio.cretti at create-net.org> > *Enviado:* viernes, 28 de agosto de 2015 9:43 > *Para:* Juanjo Hierro > *Cc:* Franck Le Gall; fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org; Angeles Tejado; > Pablo Honrubia > *Asunto:* Re: [Fiware-coaches] FIWARE assessment: VERY IMPORTANT > > Hi Juanjo, all > I think here we have to clarify something (please see also my email of > August 13st that didn't get any answer): > 1) What is the FIWARE usage assessment score card you are referring to? Is > it the one that has been posted by Pablo in Bsaecamp for the technical > part? > 2) If the answer to the previous question is yes, then: > 2.0) Are we going to use the survey result to fill in that score card? > 2.1) Do we have to evaluate only the SME selected by the business > evaluation as the guidelines are stating? > 2.2) That form refers to some KPI. Which ones are to be considered? > 2.3) That form refers to a "technical excellence rating": how can we > determine this? > 2.4) How can we guarantee to provide a uniform rate across the different > accelerators/evaluators? > 2.5) We, as coaches, should probably be contacted by our accelerator > program in order to provide this evaluation. Am I wrong? For the moment I > didn't receive anything from my accelerator (CreatiFI) > 3) if the answer to the question 2 is no, then which is the score card to > be filled in? > 4) regarding to our score card ( > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Dijrn2gUsU0-dPhVqE9RXKi6MKkLnBVn_3YUEQWvCSs/edit?usp=sharing) > my fieeling is that it will be filled in automatially/or almost > automatically by the survey tool. Am I wrong? > > Thank in advance for the answers you can provide. > Best regards > silvio > > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Juanjo Hierro < > juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com> wrote: > >> Folks, >> >> I don't know if there has been some progress since the last report from >> Frank regarding progress on the on-line survey on August 24th (see attached >> message) ... but the dealine of August 31st is around the corner and it >> would be worth sending a reminder to startups/SMEs. Coaches have to play >> an active role demanding a response from the startup/SME within the FIWARE >> Accelerator programme. >> >> @Franck: could you generate updated statistics regarding responses to >> the survey? >> >> Given said this, I remind you that this survey will help to get the >> input about the self-assessment that the startups/SMEs made themselves >> regarding FIWARE usage. *HOWEVER, the real assessment has to be >> performed by you*, that is, you should complete the FIWARE usage >> assessment score card regarding projects within the Accelerator programme >> you coach. Please complete your assessment by Thursday, September 3 >> EOB. If you need help from FIWARE experts please let Stefano and myself >> know. >> >> On September 7th, Stefano and myself have been invited to attend a >> follow-up confcall with the EC and we should be able to report that the >> exercise is complete. >> >> I also remind you that you should provide the data of your assessment >> on the following shared spreadsheet: >> >> >> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Dijrn2gUsU0-dPhVqE9RXKi6MKkLnBVn_3YUEQWvCSs/edit?usp=sharing >> >> >> We may upload the results of the survey (self-assessment by the >> startups/SMEs on their projects) in the following, different, spreadsheet I >> have just created. Note that this has the same structure as the previous >> but we should place the name of the startup/SME instead of the name of the >> evaluator in column C: >> >> >> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1J8qACLN0MjuMIPY-XVdkhZbvGMPASA70IqxxLyNIg3s/edit?usp=sharing >> >> >> I hope that Franck will be able to configure a tool that would allow to >> automatically assign values in this second spreadsheet based on data >> gathered through the on-line survey. >> >> I copy Angeles and Pablo from Ogilvy who are monitoring collection of >> input regarding the business impact assessment, so that we all know where >> we are regarding the process of assessment. >> >> Cheers, >> >> -- Juanjo >> >> ______________________________________________________ >> >> Coordinator and Chief Architect, FIWARE platform >> CTO Industrial IoT, Telefónica >> >> email: juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com >> twitter: @JuanjoHierro >> >> You can follow FIWARE at: >> website: http://www.fiware.org >> twitter: @FIWARE >> facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 >> linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 >> >> On 24/08/15 23:13, Franck Le Gall wrote: >> >> Dear coaches, >> >> >> >> Here is the return rate((number of received answers compared to number of >> invitation sent, per accelerator) on the survey: >> >> >> >> NB >> >> % >> >> FABulous >> >> 2 >> >> 4% >> >> FINODEX >> >> 6 >> >> 13% >> >> FrontiesCities >> >> 9 >> >> 32% >> >> INCENSe >> >> 1 >> >> 7% >> >> FRACTALS >> >> 3 >> >> 7% >> >> FI-ADOPT >> >> 3 >> >> 9% >> >> SmartAgriFood >> >> 5 >> >> 10% >> >> FInish >> >> 2 >> >> 6% >> >> SOUL-FI >> >> 9 >> >> 7% >> >> IMPACT >> >> 5 >> >> 26% >> >> SpeedUp!Europe >> >> 16 >> >> 20% >> >> EuropeanPioneers >> >> 3 >> >> 25% >> >> CEED Tech >> >> 7 >> >> 22% >> >> CREAtiFi >> >> 30 >> >> 53% >> >> FI-C3 >> >> 1 >> >> 9% >> >> FICHe >> >> 3 >> >> 15% >> >> *TOTAL* >> >> *105* >> >> 16% >> >> >> >> >> >> Make sure to motivate your SMEs to answer. Silvio with Creatifi is the >> forerunner ;) >> >> >> >> Franck >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Fiware-coaches mailing listFiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.orghttps://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-coaches >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, >> puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso >> exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el >> destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilización, >> divulgación y/o copia sin autorización puede estar prohibida en virtud de >> la legislación vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos >> que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su >> destrucción. >> >> The information contained in this transmission is privileged and >> confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or >> entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended >> recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or >> copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received >> this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the >> sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete >> it. >> >> Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu >> destinatário, pode conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial e é para >> uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se não é vossa senhoria o >> destinatário indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utilização, >> divulgação e/ou cópia sem autorização pode estar proibida em virtude da >> legislação vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos >> o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destruição >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Fiware-coaches mailing list >> Fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org >> https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-coaches >> >> > > Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If > you are not the addressee indicated in this message, you should destroy > this message. For more information on WPP's business ethical standards and > corporate responsibility policies, please refer to WPP's website. > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-coaches/attachments/20150828/70c03dae/attachment.html>
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy