Hi, In two weeks I’ll be preparing for the FIWARE Developers Week, but I guess I could grab a few of those and lend you a hand. Also I don’t think there should be a problem with neutrality while evaluating projects that have received feedback from a coach. If a project is better as a result of a coaches’ feedback then it obviously should get a good evaluation score. Regards, Leandro > El 18/2/2015, a las 16:46, Franck Le Gall <franck.le-gall at eglobalmark.com> escribió: > > > Hello > > FICHE accelerator will start it second phase review in 2 weeks to go from 80 to 40 SMEs > > They would like to have at least 2 FIWARE evaluators so to provide a ‘2 heads’ vision. > In addition, I feel that some SMEs may question my neutrality as I will know some of the SMEs better due to the coaching activities. > > Would another coache be available for these evaluations ? It will be 80 proposals, each having 2 pages related to use of FIWARE. > > The same is likely to apply for the pitch session( to go from 40 to 20 SMEs) this summer. > > Any advice welcome > > Franck > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-coaches mailing list > Fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org <mailto:Fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org> > https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-coaches <https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-coaches> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-coaches/attachments/20150218/a0b7ca13/attachment.html>
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy