[Fiware-coaches] Proposals with GEs removed from catalogue

[Stefano De Panfilis]

Dear Ilknur and Franck, 

apologises for this late replay (to ilknur mostly) as i get the email only from the franck one, sometimes things are misterious in internet ... 

by the way, as you migth know we are thinking to define two sets of geis: the official one which lists the FIWARE geis, and the "candidate" ones which are those submitted to the FIWARE Architecture Board (to be established) and that are not yet fully implemented or fully compliant with FIWARE requirements (for instance are not yet o.s or the documentation is not at the rigth lelevl of quality). 

those geis which are not any longer in the catalogue, but were there migth be considered "candidate"s. this means that if there is a real interest from developers on a specific gei, my suggestion, as i did in some cases already, is to put in direct contact the developers with the gei owners and let them find an agreement. 

of course the developers must be made aware about the status of the specifi gei they are interested in. 

ciao, 

stefano 

Franck Le Gall <franck.le-gall at eglobalmark.com> ha scritto: 

> Dear Ilknur  
>
> I had this case and proceeded as you suggest, by warning the team about the issue. I did not marked negatively but raise the need to identify alternatives.  
>
> Kind regards  
>
> DE : fiware-coaches-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [mailto:fiware-coaches-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] DE LA PART DE Chulani, Ilknur
> ENVOYé : samedi 3 janvier 2015 17:16
> À : fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org
> OBJET : [Fiware-coaches] Proposals with GEs removed from catalogue   
>
> Dear all,   
>
> Are there any guidelines on how to proceed when we come across proposals that are planning to use GEs that  were removed from the FIWARE Catalogue?   
>
> For instance, currently I am reviewing some proposals for an accelerator project which are referring to “Location GE”, which is not in the catalogue anymore.   
>
> How do we proceed with proposals like this? Do we tell them their plans are not feasible ? or guide them towards using some other GEs that can be used instead, etc.?   
>
> Thanks in advance,   
>
> ilknur   
>
> İLKNUR CHULANI   
>
> Technical Lead   
>
>
> Research & Innovation   
>
>
> ilknur.chulani at atos.net[1]   
>
> T +90 212 286 4666   
>
>
> ITU ARI-2 Teknokent B Blok K4   
>
>
> 34398 Maslak, Istanbul, Turkey   
>
> www.atosresearch.eu[2]   
>
>
> www.atos.net[3]   
>
> Bu mesaj ve ekleri gönderilen kiþiye özeldir ve gizli bilgiler içerebilir. Eðer mesajýn gönderilmek istendiði kiþi deðilseniz lütfen kopyalamayýnýz, baþkalarýna göndermeyiniz ve göndericiyi bilgilendiriniz. Internet üzerinden gönderilen mesajlarýn güvenli ve hatasýz olduðunun garantisi olmadýðýndan Atos grubu mesajýn içeriðinden sorumlu tutulamaz. Göndericinin bilgisayarý anti-virüs sistemleri tarafýndan taranmaktadýr, ancak yine de mesajýn virüs içermediði garanti edilemez ve gönderici, meydana gelebilecek zararlardan sorumlu tutulamaz.
>
> This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavors to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted.



Link:
-----
[1] mailto:%C4%B0lknur.chulani at atos.net
[2] http://www.atosresearch.eu/
[3] http://www.atos.net/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-coaches/attachments/20150109/ca3c4d4c/attachment.html>