From franck.le-gall at eglobalmark.com Wed Jul 1 11:55:57 2015 From: franck.le-gall at eglobalmark.com (Franck Le Gall) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 09:55:57 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] Checking a fiware lab account is a community account Message-ID: Hello, Basic question : is there an easy/rapid way to check that a fiware lab account has been granted to community level ? Thank you Franck -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ilknur.chulani at atos.net Wed Jul 1 12:01:13 2015 From: ilknur.chulani at atos.net (Chulani, Ilknur) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 10:01:13 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] Checking a fiware lab account is a community account References: Message-ID: Sending again, to include the mailing list, in case it?s useful to other coaches as well. Best regards, ilknur From: Chulani, Ilknur Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 12:59 PM To: 'Franck Le Gall' Subject: RE: [Fiware-coaches] Checking a fiware lab account is a community account Hi Franck, Here are the steps users can follow to check their account type: - Login to Fiware lab, they will see their name on the top right corner - Click on the arrow next to it - Select settings in the menu that gets displayed - Select Account status on the page that is displayed, it will show them if they have a trial account or community account. Kind regards, ilknur From: fiware-coaches-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [mailto:fiware-coaches-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] On Behalf Of Franck Le Gall Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 12:56 PM To: fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org Subject: [Fiware-coaches] Checking a fiware lab account is a community account Hello, Basic question : is there an easy/rapid way to check that a fiware lab account has been granted to community level ? Thank you Franck Bu mesaj ve ekleri g?nderilen ki?iye ?zeldir ve gizli bilgiler i?erebilir. E?er mesaj?n g?nderilmek istendi?i ki?i de?ilseniz l?tfen kopyalamay?n?z, ba?kalar?na g?ndermeyiniz ve g?ndericiyi bilgilendiriniz. Internet ?zerinden g?nderilen mesajlar?n g?venli ve hatas?z oldu?unun garantisi olmad???ndan Atos grubu mesaj?n i?eri?inden sorumlu tutulamaz. G?ndericinin bilgisayar? anti-vir?s sistemleri taraf?ndan taranmaktad?r, ancak yine de mesaj?n vir?s i?ermedi?i garanti edilemez ve g?nderici, meydana gelebilecek zararlardan sorumlu tutulamaz. This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavors to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ilknur.chulani at atos.net Thu Jul 2 17:00:06 2015 From: ilknur.chulani at atos.net (Chulani, Ilknur) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 15:00:06 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] Reject and Re-open options for FLUA tickets Message-ID: Dear Federico, (cc'ying coaches in case they have the same issue) I have two questions regarding the FLUA tracker: 1- In some cases we need to close a FLUA ticket without approving or rejecting the request, for instance, when it is a duplicate request. Since there is no existing options for doing this, I was using the reject option to close the duplicate request using the "reject" option. But now this is also not possible, as this option now forces you to fill in missing fields in the SMEs form, such as instance number etc. Has there been a change in the FLUA tracker logic to force all fields to be filled in? Here is an example: https://jira.fiware.org:8443/browse/FLUA-1220 2- Other thing is, there is no way to re-open a FLUA ticket once it is closed, this could be helpful as well, as sometimes we get further inquiries from the SMEs after their request has been processed. Best regards, ilknur ?lknur Chulani Technical Lead Research & Innovation ilknur.chulani at atos.net T +90 212 286 4666 ITU ARI-2 Teknokent B Blok K4 34398 Maslak, Istanbul, Turkey www.atosresearch.eu www.atos.net [cid:image002.png at 01CFE2E5.8B76CA80] Bu mesaj ve ekleri g?nderilen ki?iye ?zeldir ve gizli bilgiler i?erebilir. E?er mesajyn g?nderilmek istendi?i ki?i de?ilseniz l?tfen kopyalamayynyz, ba?kalaryna g?ndermeyiniz ve g?ndericiyi bilgilendiriniz. Internet ?zerinden g?nderilen mesajlaryn g?venli ve hatasyz oldu?unun garantisi olmady?yndan Atos grubu mesajyn i?eri?inden sorumlu tutulamaz. G?ndericinin bilgisayary anti-vir?s sistemleri tarafyndan taranmaktadyr, ancak yine de mesajyn vir?s i?ermedi?i garanti edilemez ve g?nderici, meydana gelebilecek zararlardan sorumlu tutulamaz. This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavors to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) 1.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 907 bytes Desc: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) 1.jpg URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) 2.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 4286 bytes Desc: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) 2.jpg URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Thu Jul 2 19:18:56 2015 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 19:18:56 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] Reject and Re-open options for FLUA tickets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: dear ilknur, my advises in line: > > I have two questions regarding the FLUA tracker: > > 1- In some cases we need to close a FLUA ticket without approving or > rejecting the request, for instance, when it is a duplicate request. Since > there is no existing options for doing this, I was using the reject option > to close the duplicate request using the ?reject? option. > > But now this is also not possible, as this option now forces you to fill > in missing fields in the SMEs form, such as instance number etc. Has there > been a change in the FLUA tracker logic to force all fields to be filled in? > > Here is an example: > https://jira.fiware.org:8443/browse/FLUA-1220 > simply close it with a message "duplicate ticket". perhaps too simple, but better than the negative "reject". > > 2- Other thing is, there is no way to re-open a FLUA ticket once it is > closed, this could be helpful as well, as sometimes we get further > inquiries from the SMEs after their request has been processed. > if the ticket was closed this means the request was solved. so if it is a further request (e.g. more memory, or info about a specific ge not present) a new ticket should be open as this is anyway a new story. ciao, stefano > > Best regards, > > ilknur > *?lknur Chulani* > > Technical Lead > Research & Innovation > *ilknur.chulani at atos.net* > > T +90 212 286 4666 > ITU ARI-2 Teknokent B Blok K4 > 34398 Maslak, Istanbul, Turkey > > *www.atosresearch.eu* > *www.atos.net* > > > > > Bu mesaj ve ekleri g?nderilen ki?iye ?zeldir ve gizli bilgiler i?erebilir. > E?er mesaj?n g?nderilmek istendi?i ki?i de?ilseniz l?tfen kopyalamay?n?z, > ba?kalar?na g?ndermeyiniz ve g?ndericiyi bilgilendiriniz. Internet > ?zerinden g?nderilen mesajlar?n g?venli ve hatas?z oldu?unun garantisi > olmad???ndan Atos grubu mesaj?n i?eri?inden sorumlu tutulamaz. G?ndericinin > bilgisayar? anti-vir?s sistemleri taraf?ndan taranmaktad?r, ancak yine de > mesaj?n vir?s i?ermedi?i garanti edilemez ve g?nderici, meydana gelebilecek > zararlardan sorumlu tutulamaz. > > This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended > solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this > e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As > its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability > cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavors > to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that > this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages > resulting from any virus transmitted. > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-coaches mailing list > Fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org > https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-coaches > > -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-06-8759-4253 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 skype: depa01 twitter: @depa01 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) 2.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 4286 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) 1.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 907 bytes Desc: not available URL: From ilknur.chulani at atos.net Fri Jul 3 10:18:24 2015 From: ilknur.chulani at atos.net (Chulani, Ilknur) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 08:18:24 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] Reject and Re-open options for FLUA tickets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Stefano, Thank you for your feedback. I completely agree, the ?Close? option would be the best, but the issue is ?Close? option is disabled in the FLUA tickets. That?s why we end up using the ?reject? option as a workaround. Now, the reject option also does not seem possible any more without having to make up fake data for lots of fields. Would it be possible for Federico or his team to enable ?Close? option in this tracker or to allow ?reject? without having to enter the mandatory fields? Regarding ?re-open?, this is needed mostly when the user?s request did not complete properly, for instance the node team did not grant the community account properly or if the user is still having access issues, etc. Currently, we re-open only the node ticket in these cases, not able to re-open the main ticket. I feel this is more or less tolerable, but the ?close? issue I mentioned above is more urgent to resolve. Best regards, ilknur From: stefano de panfilis [mailto:stefano.depanfilis at eng.it] Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 8:19 PM To: Chulani, Ilknur Cc: Federico Michele Facca; fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org Subject: Re: [Fiware-coaches] Reject and Re-open options for FLUA tickets dear ilknur, my advises in line: I have two questions regarding the FLUA tracker: 1- In some cases we need to close a FLUA ticket without approving or rejecting the request, for instance, when it is a duplicate request. Since there is no existing options for doing this, I was using the reject option to close the duplicate request using the ?reject? option. But now this is also not possible, as this option now forces you to fill in missing fields in the SMEs form, such as instance number etc. Has there been a change in the FLUA tracker logic to force all fields to be filled in? Here is an example: https://jira.fiware.org:8443/browse/FLUA-1220 simply close it with a message "duplicate ticket". perhaps too simple, but better than the negative "reject". 2- Other thing is, there is no way to re-open a FLUA ticket once it is closed, this could be helpful as well, as sometimes we get further inquiries from the SMEs after their request has been processed. if the ticket was closed this means the request was solved. so if it is a further request (e.g. more memory, or info about a specific ge not present) a new ticket should be open as this is anyway a new story. ciao, stefano Best regards, ilknur ?lknur Chulani Technical Lead Research & Innovation ilknur.chulani at atos.net T +90 212 286 4666 ITU ARI-2 Teknokent B Blok K4 34398 Maslak, Istanbul, Turkey www.atosresearch.eu www.atos.net [cid:image002.jpg at 01D0B581.F7C8E050] Bu mesaj ve ekleri g?nderilen ki?iye ?zeldir ve gizli bilgiler i?erebilir. E?er mesaj?n g?nderilmek istendi?i ki?i de?ilseniz l?tfen kopyalamay?n?z, ba?kalar?na g?ndermeyiniz ve g?ndericiyi bilgilendiriniz. Internet ?zerinden g?nderilen mesajlar?n g?venli ve hatas?z oldu?unun garantisi olmad???ndan Atos grubu mesaj?n i?eri?inden sorumlu tutulamaz. G?ndericinin bilgisayar? anti-vir?s sistemleri taraf?ndan taranmaktad?r, ancak yine de mesaj?n vir?s i?ermedi?i garanti edilemez ve g?nderici, meydana gelebilecek zararlardan sorumlu tutulamaz. This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavors to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. _______________________________________________ Fiware-coaches mailing list Fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-coaches -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-06-8759-4253 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 skype: depa01 twitter: @depa01 Bu mesaj ve ekleri g?nderilen ki?iye ?zeldir ve gizli bilgiler i?erebilir. E?er mesaj?n g?nderilmek istendi?i ki?i de?ilseniz l?tfen kopyalamay?n?z, ba?kalar?na g?ndermeyiniz ve g?ndericiyi bilgilendiriniz. Internet ?zerinden g?nderilen mesajlar?n g?venli ve hatas?z oldu?unun garantisi olmad???ndan Atos grubu mesaj?n i?eri?inden sorumlu tutulamaz. G?ndericinin bilgisayar? anti-vir?s sistemleri taraf?ndan taranmaktad?r, ancak yine de mesaj?n vir?s i?ermedi?i garanti edilemez ve g?nderici, meydana gelebilecek zararlardan sorumlu tutulamaz. This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavors to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 907 bytes Desc: image001.jpg URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 4286 bytes Desc: image002.jpg URL: From federico.facca at create-net.org Fri Jul 3 11:03:51 2015 From: federico.facca at create-net.org (Federico Michele Facca) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 11:03:51 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] Reject and Re-open options for FLUA tickets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Chulani, Ilknur wrote: > Hi Stefano, > > > > Thank you for your feedback. I completely agree, the ?Close? option would > be the best, but the issue is ?Close? option is disabled in the FLUA > tickets. That?s why we end up using the ?reject? option as a workaround. > Now, the reject option also does not seem possible any more without having > to make up fake data for lots of fields. Would it be possible for Federico > or his team to enable ?Close? option in this tracker or to allow ?reject? > without having to enter the mandatory fields? > i see some confusion here. reject or accept describes only the status of the request. and has nothing to do with what you say to the person... i.e. by clicking accept or reject you close the ticket assigning to it a label. logically a duplicated request should ends in the "reject" case, you are telling the person "there is already an open ticket, so we go on from that one and i close this one." if you wanna be precise then you link the ticket also to the duplicate one. as said, there is no issue: the user view and the help desk view are two separate things and we should not confuse them. from the help desk point of view, a request cannot end in inconsistend status. > > Regarding ?re-open?, this is needed mostly when the user?s request did not > complete properly, for instance the node team did not grant the community > account properly or if the user is still having access issues, etc. > Currently, we re-open only the node ticket in these cases, not able to > re-open the main ticket. I feel this is more or less tolerable, but the > ?close? issue I mentioned above is more urgent to resolve. > to re-open at the moment you need to be admin. best, federico > > > Best regards, > > > > ilknur > > > > *From:* stefano de panfilis [mailto:stefano.depanfilis at eng.it] > *Sent:* Thursday, July 02, 2015 8:19 PM > *To:* Chulani, Ilknur > *Cc:* Federico Michele Facca; fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org > *Subject:* Re: [Fiware-coaches] Reject and Re-open options for FLUA > tickets > > > > dear ilknur, > > my advises in line: > > > > > I have two questions regarding the FLUA tracker: > > > > 1- In some cases we need to close a FLUA ticket without approving or > rejecting the request, for instance, when it is a duplicate request. Since > there is no existing options for doing this, I was using the reject option > to close the duplicate request using the ?reject? option. > > > > But now this is also not possible, as this option now forces you to fill > in missing fields in the SMEs form, such as instance number etc. Has there > been a change in the FLUA tracker logic to force all fields to be filled in? > > > > Here is an example: > > https://jira.fiware.org:8443/browse/FLUA-1220 > > > > simply close it with a message "duplicate ticket". perhaps too simple, but > better than the negative "reject". > > > > > 2- Other thing is, there is no way to re-open a FLUA ticket once it is > closed, this could be helpful as well, as sometimes we get further > inquiries from the SMEs after their request has been processed. > > > > if the ticket was closed this means the request was solved. so if it is a > further request (e.g. more memory, or info about a specific ge not present) > a new ticket should be open as this is anyway a new story. > > ciao, > > stefano > > > > Best regards, > > > > ilknur > > *?lknur Chulani* > > > > Technical Lead > > Research & Innovation > > ilknur.chulani at atos.net > > > > T +90 212 286 4666 > > ITU ARI-2 Teknokent B Blok K4 > > 34398 Maslak, Istanbul, Turkey > > > > www.atosresearch.eu > > www.atos.net > > > > > > > > > > Bu mesaj ve ekleri g?nderilen ki?iye ?zeldir ve gizli bilgiler i?erebilir. > E?er mesaj?n g?nderilmek istendi?i ki?i de?ilseniz l?tfen kopyalamay?n?z, > ba?kalar?na g?ndermeyiniz ve g?ndericiyi bilgilendiriniz. Internet > ?zerinden g?nderilen mesajlar?n g?venli ve hatas?z oldu?unun garantisi > olmad???ndan Atos grubu mesaj?n i?eri?inden sorumlu tutulamaz. G?ndericinin > bilgisayar? anti-vir?s sistemleri taraf?ndan taranmaktad?r, ancak yine de > mesaj?n vir?s i?ermedi?i garanti edilemez ve g?nderici, meydana gelebilecek > zararlardan sorumlu tutulamaz. > > This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended > solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this > e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As > its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability > cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavors > to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that > this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages > resulting from any virus transmitted. > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-coaches mailing list > Fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org > https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-coaches > > > > > -- > > Stefano De Panfilis > Chief Innovation Officer > Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. > via Riccardo Morandi 32 > 00148 Roma > Italy > > tel (direct): +39-06-8759-4253 > tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 > fax: +39-068307-4200 > cell: +39-335-7542-567 > > skype: depa01 > > twitter: @depa01 > > > Bu mesaj ve ekleri g?nderilen ki?iye ?zeldir ve gizli bilgiler > i?erebilir. E?er mesaj?n g?nderilmek istendi?i ki?i de?ilseniz l?tfen > kopyalamay?n?z, ba?kalar?na g?ndermeyiniz ve g?ndericiyi bilgilendiriniz. > Internet ?zerinden g?nderilen mesajlar?n g?venli ve hatas?z oldu?unun > garantisi olmad???ndan Atos grubu mesaj?n i?eri?inden sorumlu tutulamaz. > G?ndericinin bilgisayar? anti-vir?s sistemleri taraf?ndan taranmaktad?r, > ancak yine de mesaj?n vir?s i?ermedi?i garanti edilemez ve g?nderici, > meydana gelebilecek zararlardan sorumlu tutulamaz. > > This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended > solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this > e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As > its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability > cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavors > to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that > this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages > resulting from any virus transmitted. > -- -- Future Internet is closer than you think! http://www.fiware.org Official Mirantis partner for OpenStack Training https://www.create-net.org/community/openstack-training -- Dr. Federico M. Facca CREATE-NET Via alla Cascata 56/D 38123 Povo Trento (Italy) P +39 0461 312471 M +39 334 6049758 E federico.facca at create-net.org T @chicco785 W www.create-net.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 907 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 4286 bytes Desc: not available URL: From ilknur.chulani at atos.net Fri Jul 3 11:23:29 2015 From: ilknur.chulani at atos.net (Chulani, Ilknur) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 09:23:29 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] Reject and Re-open options for FLUA tickets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Dear Federico, Thanks for the clarification. We indeed use the ?reject? option as you say, to close the duplicate tickets or any other tickets that do not require a new node ticket. But the problem is we cannot do this anymore. I believe something has changed in the system. Now it is asking us to fill in all the fields the user has missed in the form when we try to reject a request. Would it be possible to fix this and make it like the old way? Many thanks, ilknur From: Federico Michele Facca [mailto:federico.facca at create-net.org] Sent: Friday, July 03, 2015 12:04 PM To: Chulani, Ilknur Cc: stefano de panfilis; fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org Subject: Re: [Fiware-coaches] Reject and Re-open options for FLUA tickets On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Chulani, Ilknur > wrote: Hi Stefano, Thank you for your feedback. I completely agree, the ?Close? option would be the best, but the issue is ?Close? option is disabled in the FLUA tickets. That?s why we end up using the ?reject? option as a workaround. Now, the reject option also does not seem possible any more without having to make up fake data for lots of fields. Would it be possible for Federico or his team to enable ?Close? option in this tracker or to allow ?reject? without having to enter the mandatory fields? i see some confusion here. reject or accept describes only the status of the request. and has nothing to do with what you say to the person... i.e. by clicking accept or reject you close the ticket assigning to it a label. logically a duplicated request should ends in the "reject" case, you are telling the person "there is already an open ticket, so we go on from that one and i close this one." if you wanna be precise then you link the ticket also to the duplicate one. as said, there is no issue: the user view and the help desk view are two separate things and we should not confuse them. from the help desk point of view, a request cannot end in inconsistend status. Regarding ?re-open?, this is needed mostly when the user?s request did not complete properly, for instance the node team did not grant the community account properly or if the user is still having access issues, etc. Currently, we re-open only the node ticket in these cases, not able to re-open the main ticket. I feel this is more or less tolerable, but the ?close? issue I mentioned above is more urgent to resolve. to re-open at the moment you need to be admin. best, federico Best regards, ilknur From: stefano de panfilis [mailto:stefano.depanfilis at eng.it] Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 8:19 PM To: Chulani, Ilknur Cc: Federico Michele Facca; fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org Subject: Re: [Fiware-coaches] Reject and Re-open options for FLUA tickets dear ilknur, my advises in line: I have two questions regarding the FLUA tracker: 1- In some cases we need to close a FLUA ticket without approving or rejecting the request, for instance, when it is a duplicate request. Since there is no existing options for doing this, I was using the reject option to close the duplicate request using the ?reject? option. But now this is also not possible, as this option now forces you to fill in missing fields in the SMEs form, such as instance number etc. Has there been a change in the FLUA tracker logic to force all fields to be filled in? Here is an example: https://jira.fiware.org:8443/browse/FLUA-1220 simply close it with a message "duplicate ticket". perhaps too simple, but better than the negative "reject". 2- Other thing is, there is no way to re-open a FLUA ticket once it is closed, this could be helpful as well, as sometimes we get further inquiries from the SMEs after their request has been processed. if the ticket was closed this means the request was solved. so if it is a further request (e.g. more memory, or info about a specific ge not present) a new ticket should be open as this is anyway a new story. ciao, stefano Best regards, ilknur ?lknur Chulani Technical Lead Research & Innovation ilknur.chulani at atos.net T +90 212 286 4666 ITU ARI-2 Teknokent B Blok K4 34398 Maslak, Istanbul, Turkey www.atosresearch.eu www.atos.net [cid:image002.jpg at 01D0B58B.1071A7F0] Bu mesaj ve ekleri g?nderilen ki?iye ?zeldir ve gizli bilgiler i?erebilir. E?er mesaj?n g?nderilmek istendi?i ki?i de?ilseniz l?tfen kopyalamay?n?z, ba?kalar?na g?ndermeyiniz ve g?ndericiyi bilgilendiriniz. Internet ?zerinden g?nderilen mesajlar?n g?venli ve hatas?z oldu?unun garantisi olmad???ndan Atos grubu mesaj?n i?eri?inden sorumlu tutulamaz. G?ndericinin bilgisayar? anti-vir?s sistemleri taraf?ndan taranmaktad?r, ancak yine de mesaj?n vir?s i?ermedi?i garanti edilemez ve g?nderici, meydana gelebilecek zararlardan sorumlu tutulamaz. This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavors to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. _______________________________________________ Fiware-coaches mailing list Fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-coaches -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-06-8759-4253 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 skype: depa01 twitter: @depa01 Bu mesaj ve ekleri g?nderilen ki?iye ?zeldir ve gizli bilgiler i?erebilir. E?er mesaj?n g?nderilmek istendi?i ki?i de?ilseniz l?tfen kopyalamay?n?z, ba?kalar?na g?ndermeyiniz ve g?ndericiyi bilgilendiriniz. Internet ?zerinden g?nderilen mesajlar?n g?venli ve hatas?z oldu?unun garantisi olmad???ndan Atos grubu mesaj?n i?eri?inden sorumlu tutulamaz. G?ndericinin bilgisayar? anti-vir?s sistemleri taraf?ndan taranmaktad?r, ancak yine de mesaj?n vir?s i?ermedi?i garanti edilemez ve g?nderici, meydana gelebilecek zararlardan sorumlu tutulamaz. This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavors to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. -- -- Future Internet is closer than you think! http://www.fiware.org Official Mirantis partner for OpenStack Training https://www.create-net.org/community/openstack-training -- Dr. Federico M. Facca CREATE-NET Via alla Cascata 56/D 38123 Povo Trento (Italy) P +39 0461 312471 M +39 334 6049758 E federico.facca at create-net.org T @chicco785 W www.create-net.org Bu mesaj ve ekleri g?nderilen ki?iye ?zeldir ve gizli bilgiler i?erebilir. E?er mesaj?n g?nderilmek istendi?i ki?i de?ilseniz l?tfen kopyalamay?n?z, ba?kalar?na g?ndermeyiniz ve g?ndericiyi bilgilendiriniz. Internet ?zerinden g?nderilen mesajlar?n g?venli ve hatas?z oldu?unun garantisi olmad???ndan Atos grubu mesaj?n i?eri?inden sorumlu tutulamaz. G?ndericinin bilgisayar? anti-vir?s sistemleri taraf?ndan taranmaktad?r, ancak yine de mesaj?n vir?s i?ermedi?i garanti edilemez ve g?nderici, meydana gelebilecek zararlardan sorumlu tutulamaz. This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavors to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 907 bytes Desc: image001.jpg URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 4286 bytes Desc: image002.jpg URL: From federico.facca at create-net.org Fri Jul 3 11:31:25 2015 From: federico.facca at create-net.org (Federico Michele Facca) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 11:31:25 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] Reject and Re-open options for FLUA tickets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Ilknur, this was a request from Alfonso and Manuel that some data become cumpolsory, of course this affect all request that do not include it, just fill in some data. New requests from users will include already the data. Federico On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Chulani, Ilknur wrote: > Dear Federico, > > > > Thanks for the clarification. We indeed use the ?reject? option as you > say, to close the duplicate tickets or any other tickets that do not > require a new node ticket. > > > > But the problem is we cannot do this anymore. I believe something has > changed in the system. Now it is asking us to fill in all the fields the > user has missed in the form when we try to reject a request. > > > > Would it be possible to fix this and make it like the old way? > > > > Many thanks, > > > > ilknur > > > > > > *From:* Federico Michele Facca [mailto:federico.facca at create-net.org] > *Sent:* Friday, July 03, 2015 12:04 PM > *To:* Chulani, Ilknur > *Cc:* stefano de panfilis; fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org > > *Subject:* Re: [Fiware-coaches] Reject and Re-open options for FLUA > tickets > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Chulani, Ilknur > wrote: > > Hi Stefano, > > > > Thank you for your feedback. I completely agree, the ?Close? option would > be the best, but the issue is ?Close? option is disabled in the FLUA > tickets. That?s why we end up using the ?reject? option as a workaround. > Now, the reject option also does not seem possible any more without having > to make up fake data for lots of fields. Would it be possible for Federico > or his team to enable ?Close? option in this tracker or to allow ?reject? > without having to enter the mandatory fields? > > > > i see some confusion here. reject or accept describes only the status of > the request. and has nothing to do with what you say to the person... > > i.e. by clicking accept or reject you close the ticket assigning to it a > label. logically a duplicated request should ends in the "reject" case, you > are telling the person "there is already an open ticket, so we go on from > that one and i close this one." > > > > if you wanna be precise then you link the ticket also to the duplicate > one. > > > > as said, there is no issue: the user view and the help desk view are two > separate things and we should not confuse them. > > from the help desk point of view, a request cannot end in inconsistend > status. > > > > > > > > Regarding ?re-open?, this is needed mostly when the user?s request did not > complete properly, for instance the node team did not grant the community > account properly or if the user is still having access issues, etc. > Currently, we re-open only the node ticket in these cases, not able to > re-open the main ticket. I feel this is more or less tolerable, but the > ?close? issue I mentioned above is more urgent to resolve. > > > > to re-open at the moment you need to be admin. > > > > best, > > federico > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > ilknur > > > > *From:* stefano de panfilis [mailto:stefano.depanfilis at eng.it] > *Sent:* Thursday, July 02, 2015 8:19 PM > *To:* Chulani, Ilknur > *Cc:* Federico Michele Facca; fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org > *Subject:* Re: [Fiware-coaches] Reject and Re-open options for FLUA > tickets > > > > dear ilknur, > > my advises in line: > > > > > I have two questions regarding the FLUA tracker: > > > > 1- In some cases we need to close a FLUA ticket without approving or > rejecting the request, for instance, when it is a duplicate request. Since > there is no existing options for doing this, I was using the reject option > to close the duplicate request using the ?reject? option. > > > > But now this is also not possible, as this option now forces you to fill > in missing fields in the SMEs form, such as instance number etc. Has there > been a change in the FLUA tracker logic to force all fields to be filled in? > > > > Here is an example: > > https://jira.fiware.org:8443/browse/FLUA-1220 > > > > simply close it with a message "duplicate ticket". perhaps too simple, but > better than the negative "reject". > > > > > 2- Other thing is, there is no way to re-open a FLUA ticket once it is > closed, this could be helpful as well, as sometimes we get further > inquiries from the SMEs after their request has been processed. > > > > if the ticket was closed this means the request was solved. so if it is a > further request (e.g. more memory, or info about a specific ge not present) > a new ticket should be open as this is anyway a new story. > > ciao, > > stefano > > > > Best regards, > > > > ilknur > > *?lknur Chulani* > > > > Technical Lead > > Research & Innovation > > ilknur.chulani at atos.net > > > > T +90 212 286 4666 > > ITU ARI-2 Teknokent B Blok K4 > > 34398 Maslak, Istanbul, Turkey > > > > www.atosresearch.eu > > www.atos.net > > > > > > > > > > Bu mesaj ve ekleri g?nderilen ki?iye ?zeldir ve gizli bilgiler i?erebilir. > E?er mesaj?n g?nderilmek istendi?i ki?i de?ilseniz l?tfen kopyalamay?n?z, > ba?kalar?na g?ndermeyiniz ve g?ndericiyi bilgilendiriniz. Internet > ?zerinden g?nderilen mesajlar?n g?venli ve hatas?z oldu?unun garantisi > olmad???ndan Atos grubu mesaj?n i?eri?inden sorumlu tutulamaz. G?ndericinin > bilgisayar? anti-vir?s sistemleri taraf?ndan taranmaktad?r, ancak yine de > mesaj?n vir?s i?ermedi?i garanti edilemez ve g?nderici, meydana gelebilecek > zararlardan sorumlu tutulamaz. > > This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended > solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this > e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As > its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability > cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavors > to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that > this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages > resulting from any virus transmitted. > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-coaches mailing list > Fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org > https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-coaches > > > > > -- > > Stefano De Panfilis > Chief Innovation Officer > Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. > via Riccardo Morandi 32 > 00148 Roma > Italy > > tel (direct): +39-06-8759-4253 > tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 > fax: +39-068307-4200 > cell: +39-335-7542-567 > > skype: depa01 > > twitter: @depa01 > > > > Bu mesaj ve ekleri g?nderilen ki?iye ?zeldir ve gizli bilgiler i?erebilir. > E?er mesaj?n g?nderilmek istendi?i ki?i de?ilseniz l?tfen kopyalamay?n?z, > ba?kalar?na g?ndermeyiniz ve g?ndericiyi bilgilendiriniz. Internet > ?zerinden g?nderilen mesajlar?n g?venli ve hatas?z oldu?unun garantisi > olmad???ndan Atos grubu mesaj?n i?eri?inden sorumlu tutulamaz. G?ndericinin > bilgisayar? anti-vir?s sistemleri taraf?ndan taranmaktad?r, ancak yine de > mesaj?n vir?s i?ermedi?i garanti edilemez ve g?nderici, meydana gelebilecek > zararlardan sorumlu tutulamaz. > > This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended > solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this > e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As > its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability > cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavors > to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that > this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages > resulting from any virus transmitted. > > > > > > -- > > -- > Future Internet is closer than you think! > http://www.fiware.org > > Official Mirantis partner for OpenStack Training > https://www.create-net.org/community/openstack-training > > -- > Dr. Federico M. Facca > > CREATE-NET > Via alla Cascata 56/D > 38123 Povo Trento (Italy) > > P +39 0461 312471 > M +39 334 6049758 > E federico.facca at create-net.org > T @chicco785 > W www.create-net.org > Bu mesaj ve ekleri g?nderilen ki?iye ?zeldir ve gizli bilgiler > i?erebilir. E?er mesaj?n g?nderilmek istendi?i ki?i de?ilseniz l?tfen > kopyalamay?n?z, ba?kalar?na g?ndermeyiniz ve g?ndericiyi bilgilendiriniz. > Internet ?zerinden g?nderilen mesajlar?n g?venli ve hatas?z oldu?unun > garantisi olmad???ndan Atos grubu mesaj?n i?eri?inden sorumlu tutulamaz. > G?ndericinin bilgisayar? anti-vir?s sistemleri taraf?ndan taranmaktad?r, > ancak yine de mesaj?n vir?s i?ermedi?i garanti edilemez ve g?nderici, > meydana gelebilecek zararlardan sorumlu tutulamaz. > > This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended > solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this > e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As > its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability > cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavors > to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that > this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages > resulting from any virus transmitted. > -- -- Future Internet is closer than you think! http://www.fiware.org Official Mirantis partner for OpenStack Training https://www.create-net.org/community/openstack-training -- Dr. Federico M. Facca CREATE-NET Via alla Cascata 56/D 38123 Povo Trento (Italy) P +39 0461 312471 M +39 334 6049758 E federico.facca at create-net.org T @chicco785 W www.create-net.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 907 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 4286 bytes Desc: not available URL: From silvio.cretti at create-net.org Mon Jul 6 10:33:15 2015 From: silvio.cretti at create-net.org (Silvio Cretti) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 10:33:15 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] FiWARE - SMEs survey In-Reply-To: References: <20ef17bbb9904b0c9286ca7b3e30a85e@winhexbeeu17.win.mail> Message-ID: Dear all, since I didn't attend last meeting (on Monday 29th), this email just for asking you if there is any follow up for the coaches: - do we have to start circulating the survey? - is the last version of the survey the one in the godc ( https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cIORx3li16NBy1C4rJ4v9NPOuF55vjYFxg5ttqmjlUA/edit) ? - do we have to accompany the survey with an email explaining the objectives of this initiative? Thanks in advance and best regards silvio On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Silvio Cretti < silvio.cretti at create-net.org> wrote: > Dear all, > unfortunately I am out of office from tomorrow to July 6th. So I cannot > attend the telco next Monday. > Please keep me informed on any decision taken. > Best regards, > silvio > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Franck Le Gall < > franck.le-gall at eglobalmark.com> wrote: > >> 1. Please join my meeting. >> *https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/433589109* >> >> >> 2. Use your microphone and speakers (VoIP) - a headset is recommended. >> Or, call in using your telephone. >> >> France: +33 (0) 170 950 594 >> Australia: +61 2 8355 1020 >> Austria: +43 (0) 7 2088 1047 >> Belgium: +32 (0) 28 08 4368 >> Canada: +1 (647) 497-9353 >> Denmark: +45 (0) 69 91 89 28 >> Finland: +358 (0) 942 59 7850 >> Germany: +49 (0) 692 5736 7317 >> Ireland: +353 (0) 19 030 010 >> Italy: +39 0 247 92 13 01 >> Netherlands: +31 (0) 208 080 219 >> New Zealand: +64 9 280 6302 >> Norway: +47 75 80 32 07 >> Spain: +34 911 82 9906 >> Sweden: +46 (0) 852 500 186 >> Switzerland: +41 (0) 435 0167 13 >> United Kingdom: +44 (0) 330 221 0088 >> United States: +1 (571) 317-3129 >> >> Access Code: 433-589-109 >> Audio PIN: Shown after joining the meeting >> >> Meeting ID: 433-589-109 >> >> GoToMeeting? >> Online Meetings Made Easy? >> >> Not at your computer? Click the link to join this meeting from your >> iPhone?, iPad?, Android? or Windows Phone? device via the GoToMeeting app. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Fiware-coaches mailing list >> Fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org >> https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-coaches >> >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Alfonso.Pietropaolo at eng.it Mon Jul 6 15:11:34 2015 From: Alfonso.Pietropaolo at eng.it (Pietropaolo Alfonso) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 13:11:34 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] FLUA ticket status Message-ID: <1436188216.3046.41.camel@Fujimint> Dear all, there are a lot of FLUA tickets appearing completely abandoned either by coaches or nodes. Some of them are more than 80 days old and in several cases coaches are blocking nodes and vice versa... Below the "top 10": TICKET DAYS OWNER LINKED TICKET FLUA-40 82 Leandro Guill?n FLUA-32 82 Marco Terrinoni FLUA-331 FLUA-16 82 Franck Le Gall FLUA-192 FLUA-89 77 Leandro Guill?n FLUA-409 FLUA-84 77 Leandro Guill?n FLUA-405 FLUA-122 75 Leandro Guill?n FLUA-413 FLUA-188 74 Leandro Guill?n FLUA-426 FLUA-243 73 Waterford Node Helpdesk FLUA-276 FLUA-240 73 Sergio Garcia Gomez FLUA-244 FLUA-247 72 Thierry Nagellen Please, consider to take care about your tickets as soon as possible, by the end of July we must redress the situation! Thanks for your cooperation, Alfonso -- Alfonso Pietropaolo Research and Development Laboratory Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. Via Riccardo Morandi, 32 00148 Roma - Italy Phone: +390687594370 Skype: alfopietro -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com Tue Jul 14 12:21:57 2015 From: juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 12:21:57 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] FiWARE - SMEs survey In-Reply-To: References: <20ef17bbb9904b0c9286ca7b3e30a85e@winhexbeeu17.win.mail> Message-ID: <55A4E2C5.2040205@telefonica.com> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com Wed Jul 15 11:38:36 2015 From: juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 11:38:36 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] FRANK: IMPORTANT FINAL CHECK BY FIWARE COACHES of questionnaire and evaluation dashboard to be used for FIWARE usage assessment In-Reply-To: <55A6246C.9090302@telefonica.com> References: <55A6246C.9090302@telefonica.com> Message-ID: <55A62A1C.50205@telefonica.com> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com Wed Jul 15 11:14:20 2015 From: juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 11:14:20 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] IMPORTANT FINAL CHECK BY FIWARE COACHES of questionnaire and evaluation dashboard to be used for FIWARE usage assessment Message-ID: <55A6246C.9090302@telefonica.com> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From franck.le-gall at eglobalmark.com Wed Jul 15 19:20:47 2015 From: franck.le-gall at eglobalmark.com (Franck Le Gall) Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 17:20:47 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] FRANK: IMPORTANT FINAL CHECK BY FIWARE COACHES of questionnaire and evaluation dashboard to be used for FIWARE usage assessment In-Reply-To: <55A62A1C.50205@telefonica.com> References: <55A6246C.9090302@telefonica.com> <55A62A1C.50205@telefonica.com> Message-ID: <620dec9f26e54a9489f59140fa794ba8@winhexbeeu17.win.mail> Hello Some points: #1 I can for sure transfer the questionnaire to the on-line tool. I quickly transferred the 2 first set of questions here: http://survey.eglobalmark.com/index.php/survey/index/sid/825872/newtest/Y/lang/en It is currently available to anybody for test. Feedback welcome #2 To move efficiently and track the respondents, I strongly suggest to use the mailing capabilities of the tool from which we could send personalized invitations as well as reminders to the one who did not answers => For that purpose, I would need the following table: Accelerator | SME name | Contact firstname | Contact lastname | Contact e.mail => If some coach prefer to manage their own instance of the survey this is doable #3 I suggest to put most of the questions as mandatory to be answered. OK ? #4 Our survey tool currently run under our domain name (eglobalmark.com). If we want him to run under FIWARE, I would either need a LAMP hosting on FIWARE side or redirecting a FIWARE sub-domain DNS to our server. Kind regards Franck De : fiware-coaches-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [mailto:fiware-coaches-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] De la part de Juanjo Hierro Envoy? : mercredi 15 juillet 2015 11:39 ? : fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org Objet : [Fiware-coaches] FRANK: IMPORTANT FINAL CHECK BY FIWARE COACHES of questionnaire and evaluation dashboard to be used for FIWARE usage assessment Hi, A question to Frank ... are we going to finally create a questionnaire using some sort of tool like the one you mentioned in our last confcall or should we ask each SME/startup to make their own copy of the questionnaire, answer it and send it to the corresponding coach? I need an urgent answer to this so that I can take it into consideration for the message I would like to post on Basecamp. For the rest, don't forget to review my previous email (again attached for your convenience. Cheers, -- Juanjo On 15/07/15 11:14, Juanjo Hierro wrote: Dear all, I have carried out a final review of the questionnaire and the evaluation scorecard to be used for the assessment on the usage of FIWARE by SMEs/startups under the FIWARE Accelerator programme. I will post a message on basecamp announcing that we will launch the assessment process based on the proposed questionnaire and scorecard (which I have updated after this final review) tomorrow around 16:00 unless I hear any objections from you. Therefore, please, take your time to review it. I would appreciate if you also response to this email providing a confirmation that you have actually reviewed both tools and agree with the proposed changes. I have incorporated the following changes both in the questionnaire and scorecard: * I have setup a distinction between "planned" usage and "actual" usage (the app has already implemented the criteria). Therefore, the previous values where 0 (does NOT support either A or B), 1 (supports A) and 2 (supports B) translate into values 0 (does not plan to support either A or B), 1 (plans to support A), 2 (already implements A), 3 (plans to support B), 4 (already implements B). My initial idea was to consider scores 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2, but it happens that google docs lead to problems if you use numbers with decimals, so I went for having 0 to 4. * I have modified the meaning of values assigned as scores regarding context information management so that 3-4 points are given when integration with 3rd party systems as context information sources is considered. Previously, we were giving maximum points if historic context information was registered in Cosmos for further analysis. In line with this change, I have modified the scoring regarding usage of the Cosmos BigData GE so that the 1-2 points (previously 1 point) are given when historic context information data is registered in Cosmos for further analysis. * I have aligned the meaning of values assigned for scoring usage of Wirecloud to the other GEs (CEP, Kurento, etc), so that 1-2 points (previously 1 point) are given when the GE is used and 3-4 points (previously 2 points) are given when it is used managing context information. * I introduced several editorial comments on the questionnaire so that it becomes more readable and better aligned with the scorecard. I have created final versions of both the "Questionnaire for FIWARE Usage Assessment" and the "FIWARE Usage Assessment scorecard". I have also make sure both get aligned. The final version of the "Questionnaire for FIWARE Usage Assessment" will be here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BOv96zNeytDoPMecfFBuUDmisiLxlQKJUADIbtp8XKw/edit# The final version of the "FIWARE Usage Assessment scorecard" will be here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Dijrn2gUsU0-dPhVqE9RXKi6MKkLnBVn_3YUEQWvCSs/edit?usp=sharing Cheers, -- Juanjo ______________________________________________________ Coordinator and Chief Architect, FIWARE platform CTO Industrial IoT, Telef?nica email: juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com twitter: @JuanjoHierro You can follow FIWARE at: website: http://www.fiware.org twitter: @FIWARE facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, puede contener informaci?n privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilizaci?n, divulgaci?n y/o copia sin autorizaci?n puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislaci?n vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma v?a y proceda a su destrucci?n. The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete it. Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinat?rio, pode conter informa??o privilegiada ou confidencial e ? para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se n?o ? vossa senhoria o destinat?rio indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utiliza??o, divulga??o e/ou c?pia sem autoriza??o pode estar proibida em virtude da legisla??o vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destrui??o -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From silvio.cretti at create-net.org Wed Jul 15 22:12:03 2015 From: silvio.cretti at create-net.org (Silvio Cretti) Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 22:12:03 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] IMPORTANT FINAL CHECK BY FIWARE COACHES of questionnaire and evaluation dashboard to be used for FIWARE usage assessment In-Reply-To: <55A6246C.9090302@telefonica.com> References: <55A6246C.9090302@telefonica.com> Message-ID: Dear Juanjo, all here my comments: 1) I think we should clarify to the SMEs the meaning of "planned" usage. What does it mean "planned" in this context? To have just an idea of use it? To have evaluated their usage? The have a roadmap/design for using it? ... 2) in D (Lab usage) we give higher score to a SME that decided to create its own cloud. Could we be a bit more precise on this? For example a SME could just use the IaaS Resurce Management GE (based on Openstack) and create its own cloud claiming the same score of another SME that is providing a fully fledged FIWARE instance. 2.1) Always related to D: the questionnaire and the scorecard are providing different questions. The questionnaire gives 3 points in case of a dedicated cloud and 4 for the usage of blueprint for deploying the app whereas the scorecard gives 3 for planning and 4 for implementation. 3) F (Degree of integration) is never used. Am I wrong? Is it made on purpose? 4) Big Data: here the difference between the second and the third questions is about "cluster" as opposed to "platform". Is it correct? What do we mean with "cluster" in this context? And with "platform"? Does it make sense to deploy Cosmos GE as "not a cluster". In my opinion yes but it is a trivial deployment (not suitable for Hadoop purposes). Or do we mean "hadoop federation" using the term "cluster"? I think this deserve a clarification. Last but not least: I totally support the proposal of Frank to have a common tool. It provides an uniform interface and speed up things. My questions are: a) you Frank need the list of SMEs + contact information. I image in order to configure the tool to send emails to the SMEs. Is it correct? b) then we as coaches can check the answers provided and in case remind the SMEs, that did not yet respond, asking the tool to send a reminder. Correct? c) does the tool provide automatically also the evaluation and the scoring of the answers? I mean the calculation? d) what do we as coaches have to do in order to use this tool? Thanks in advance and best regards, silvio On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Juanjo Hierro < juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com> wrote: > Dear all, > > I have carried out a final review of the questionnaire and the > evaluation scorecard to be used for the assessment on the usage of FIWARE > by SMEs/startups under the FIWARE Accelerator programme. > > I will post a message on basecamp announcing that we will launch the > assessment process based on the proposed questionnaire and scorecard (which > I have updated after this final review) tomorrow around 16:00 unless I hear > any objections from you. Therefore, please, take your time to review > it. I would appreciate if you also response to this email providing a > confirmation that you have actually reviewed both tools and agree with the > proposed changes. > > I have incorporated the following changes both in the questionnaire and > scorecard: > > - I have setup a distinction between "planned" usage and "actual" > usage (the app has already implemented the criteria). Therefore, the > previous values where 0 (does NOT support either A or B), 1 (supports A) > and 2 (supports B) translate into values 0 (does not plan to support either > A or B), 1 (plans to support A), 2 (already implements A), 3 (plans to > support B), 4 (already implements B). My initial idea was to consider > scores 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2, but it happens that google docs lead to > problems if you use numbers with decimals, so I went for having 0 to 4. > - I have modified the meaning of values assigned as scores regarding > context information management so that 3-4 points are given when > integration with 3rd party systems as context information sources is > considered. Previously, we were giving maximum points if historic context > information was registered in Cosmos for further analysis. In line with > this change, I have modified the scoring regarding usage of the Cosmos > BigData GE so that the 1-2 points (previously 1 point) are given when > historic context information data is registered in Cosmos for further > analysis. > - I have aligned the meaning of values assigned for scoring usage of > Wirecloud to the other GEs (CEP, Kurento, etc), so that 1-2 points > (previously 1 point) are given when the GE is used and 3-4 points > (previously 2 points) are given when it is used managing context > information. > - I introduced several editorial comments on the questionnaire so that > it becomes more readable and better aligned with the scorecard. > > > I have created final versions of both the "Questionnaire for FIWARE > Usage Assessment" and the "FIWARE Usage Assessment scorecard". I have > also make sure both get aligned. > > The final version of the "Questionnaire for FIWARE Usage Assessment" > will be here: > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BOv96zNeytDoPMecfFBuUDmisiLxlQKJUADIbtp8XKw/edit# > > > The final version of the "FIWARE Usage Assessment scorecard" will be > here: > > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Dijrn2gUsU0-dPhVqE9RXKi6MKkLnBVn_3YUEQWvCSs/edit?usp=sharing > > > Cheers, > > -- Juanjo > > ______________________________________________________ > > Coordinator and Chief Architect, FIWARE platform > CTO Industrial IoT, Telef?nica > > email: juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com > twitter: @JuanjoHierro > > You can follow FIWARE at: > website: http://www.fiware.org > twitter: @FIWARE > facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > > ------------------------------ > > Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, > puede contener informaci?n privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso > exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el > destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilizaci?n, > divulgaci?n y/o copia sin autorizaci?n puede estar prohibida en virtud de > la legislaci?n vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos > que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma v?a y proceda a su > destrucci?n. > > The information contained in this transmission is privileged and > confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or > entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended > recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or > copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received > this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the > sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete > it. > > Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinat?rio, > pode conter informa??o privilegiada ou confidencial e ? para uso exclusivo > da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se n?o ? vossa senhoria o destinat?rio > indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utiliza??o, divulga??o e/ou > c?pia sem autoriza??o pode estar proibida em virtude da legisla??o vigente. > Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique > imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destrui??o > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-coaches mailing list > Fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org > https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-coaches > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From franck.le-gall at eglobalmark.com Wed Jul 15 22:20:20 2015 From: franck.le-gall at eglobalmark.com (Franck Le Gall) Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 20:20:20 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] IMPORTANT FINAL CHECK BY FIWARE COACHES of questionnaire and evaluation dashboard to be used for FIWARE usage assessment In-Reply-To: References: <55A6246C.9090302@telefonica.com> Message-ID: See the answers to the questions directed to me in-line Franck De : fiware-coaches-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [mailto:fiware-coaches-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] De la part de Silvio Cretti Envoy? : mercredi 15 juillet 2015 22:12 ? : Juanjo Hierro Cc : fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org Objet : Re: [Fiware-coaches] IMPORTANT FINAL CHECK BY FIWARE COACHES of questionnaire and evaluation dashboard to be used for FIWARE usage assessment Dear Juanjo, all here my comments: 1) I think we should clarify to the SMEs the meaning of "planned" usage. What does it mean "planned" in this context? To have just an idea of use it? To have evaluated their usage? The have a roadmap/design for using it? ... 2) in D (Lab usage) we give higher score to a SME that decided to create its own cloud. Could we be a bit more precise on this? For example a SME could just use the IaaS Resurce Management GE (based on Openstack) and create its own cloud claiming the same score of another SME that is providing a fully fledged FIWARE instance. 2.1) Always related to D: the questionnaire and the scorecard are providing different questions. The questionnaire gives 3 points in case of a dedicated cloud and 4 for the usage of blueprint for deploying the app whereas the scorecard gives 3 for planning and 4 for implementation. 3) F (Degree of integration) is never used. Am I wrong? Is it made on purpose? 4) Big Data: here the difference between the second and the third questions is about "cluster" as opposed to "platform". Is it correct? What do we mean with "cluster" in this context? And with "platform"? Does it make sense to deploy Cosmos GE as "not a cluster". In my opinion yes but it is a trivial deployment (not suitable for Hadoop purposes). Or do we mean "hadoop federation" using the term "cluster"? I think this deserve a clarification. Last but not least: I totally support the proposal of Frank to have a common tool. It provides an uniform interface and speed up things. My questions are: a) you Frank need the list of SMEs + contact information. I image in order to configure the tool to send emails to the SMEs. Is it correct? -> Yes. See my other e.mail b) then we as coaches can check the answers provided and in case remind the SMEs, that did not yet respond, asking the tool to send a reminder. Correct? -> Yes. I can even create account for the one willing to have a hand on the tool c) does the tool provide automatically also the evaluation and the scoring of the answers? I mean the calculation? -> The tool can. It would request me some additional hours to set this but nothing impossible d) what do we as coaches have to do in order to use this tool? -> It depends what you want to do (from managing your own pool of SMEs or simply accessing the results). I could do a rapid webinar to show how to play with it. Thanks in advance and best regards, silvio On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Juanjo Hierro > wrote: Dear all, I have carried out a final review of the questionnaire and the evaluation scorecard to be used for the assessment on the usage of FIWARE by SMEs/startups under the FIWARE Accelerator programme. I will post a message on basecamp announcing that we will launch the assessment process based on the proposed questionnaire and scorecard (which I have updated after this final review) tomorrow around 16:00 unless I hear any objections from you. Therefore, please, take your time to review it. I would appreciate if you also response to this email providing a confirmation that you have actually reviewed both tools and agree with the proposed changes. I have incorporated the following changes both in the questionnaire and scorecard: * I have setup a distinction between "planned" usage and "actual" usage (the app has already implemented the criteria). Therefore, the previous values where 0 (does NOT support either A or B), 1 (supports A) and 2 (supports B) translate into values 0 (does not plan to support either A or B), 1 (plans to support A), 2 (already implements A), 3 (plans to support B), 4 (already implements B). My initial idea was to consider scores 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2, but it happens that google docs lead to problems if you use numbers with decimals, so I went for having 0 to 4. * I have modified the meaning of values assigned as scores regarding context information management so that 3-4 points are given when integration with 3rd party systems as context information sources is considered. Previously, we were giving maximum points if historic context information was registered in Cosmos for further analysis. In line with this change, I have modified the scoring regarding usage of the Cosmos BigData GE so that the 1-2 points (previously 1 point) are given when historic context information data is registered in Cosmos for further analysis. * I have aligned the meaning of values assigned for scoring usage of Wirecloud to the other GEs (CEP, Kurento, etc), so that 1-2 points (previously 1 point) are given when the GE is used and 3-4 points (previously 2 points) are given when it is used managing context information. * I introduced several editorial comments on the questionnaire so that it becomes more readable and better aligned with the scorecard. I have created final versions of both the "Questionnaire for FIWARE Usage Assessment" and the "FIWARE Usage Assessment scorecard". I have also make sure both get aligned. The final version of the "Questionnaire for FIWARE Usage Assessment" will be here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BOv96zNeytDoPMecfFBuUDmisiLxlQKJUADIbtp8XKw/edit# The final version of the "FIWARE Usage Assessment scorecard" will be here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Dijrn2gUsU0-dPhVqE9RXKi6MKkLnBVn_3YUEQWvCSs/edit?usp=sharing Cheers, -- Juanjo ______________________________________________________ Coordinator and Chief Architect, FIWARE platform CTO Industrial IoT, Telef?nica email: juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com twitter: @JuanjoHierro You can follow FIWARE at: website: http://www.fiware.org twitter: @FIWARE facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, puede contener informaci?n privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilizaci?n, divulgaci?n y/o copia sin autorizaci?n puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislaci?n vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma v?a y proceda a su destrucci?n. The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete it. Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinat?rio, pode conter informa??o privilegiada ou confidencial e ? para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se n?o ? vossa senhoria o destinat?rio indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utiliza??o, divulga??o e/ou c?pia sem autoriza??o pode estar proibida em virtude da legisla??o vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destrui??o _______________________________________________ Fiware-coaches mailing list Fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-coaches -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com Thu Jul 16 05:36:27 2015 From: juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 05:36:27 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] FRANK: IMPORTANT FINAL CHECK BY FIWARE COACHES of questionnaire and evaluation dashboard to be used for FIWARE usage assessment In-Reply-To: <620dec9f26e54a9489f59140fa794ba8@winhexbeeu17.win.mail> References: <55A6246C.9090302@telefonica.com> <55A62A1C.50205@telefonica.com> <620dec9f26e54a9489f59140fa794ba8@winhexbeeu17.win.mail> Message-ID: <55A726BB.3050300@telefonica.com> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com Thu Jul 16 05:50:56 2015 From: juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 05:50:56 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] IMPORTANT FINAL CHECK BY FIWARE COACHES of questionnaire and evaluation dashboard to be used for FIWARE usage assessment In-Reply-To: References: <55A6246C.9090302@telefonica.com> Message-ID: <55A72A20.1010900@telefonica.com> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From silvio.cretti at create-net.org Thu Jul 16 08:12:56 2015 From: silvio.cretti at create-net.org (Silvio Cretti) Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 08:12:56 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] IMPORTANT FINAL CHECK BY FIWARE COACHES of questionnaire and evaluation dashboard to be used for FIWARE usage assessment In-Reply-To: <55A72A20.1010900@telefonica.com> References: <55A6246C.9090302@telefonica.com> <55A72A20.1010900@telefonica.com> Message-ID: Thanks Juanjo for you answers. However I think we need to put ourselves from the SME perspective that is going to respond to the questionnaire. Only in this way we can guarantee a good level of comprehension and, at the end, a good level of the results. I suggest to re-read my comments in this perspective. Some examples: 1) concept of planned. Ok we know now what we mean be "planned" internally. But what about the respondent perspective? How can he know what we mean? Moreover our definition of "planned" is dangerous without a clear explanation exactly because the SMEs are in different phases: in CreatiFI for example it is not applicable because all the SME have almost closed their duties for phase 1. How do we handle these cases? 2) Lab usage. Ok with me, but bear in mind that if I were an SME that just installed the Object Storage GE (and OpenStack/IaaS Resource Management GE) on its premises, I will get 4 points. Correct? Is this what we want? 4) Big data. I do not think our intent is clear here: if the emphasis is on the "on demand" concept we should highlight it. I would suggest to rephrase and use the same terms in different questions (not platform in one and cluster in another - another alternative could be to use GE in place of platform in the second). Best regards, silvio On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 5:50 AM, Juanjo Hierro < juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com> wrote: > > On 15/07/15 22:20, Franck Le Gall wrote: > > See the answers to the questions directed to me in-line > > > > Franck > > > > *De :* fiware-coaches-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [ > mailto:fiware-coaches-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org > ] *De la part de* Silvio Cretti > *Envoy? :* mercredi 15 juillet 2015 22:12 > *? :* Juanjo Hierro > *Cc :* fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org > *Objet :* Re: [Fiware-coaches] IMPORTANT FINAL CHECK BY FIWARE COACHES of > questionnaire and evaluation dashboard to be used for FIWARE usage > assessment > > > > Dear Juanjo, all > > here my comments: > > 1) I think we should clarify to the SMEs the meaning of "planned" usage. > What does it mean "planned" in this context? To have just an idea of use > it? To have evaluated their usage? The have a roadmap/design for using it? > ... > > > Point is that different SMEs/startups may be in different phases of the > development of their apps. Some may have joined the programme at different > dates. It is also the case that some SMEs/startups arrive to the FIWARE > Accelerator Programme simply with an idea while others actually arrive with > rather mature prototypes or even products. A given SME/startup may have > considered already to use FIWARE GE "A" but they haven't indeed implemented > it. > > Planned in this context means they have already committed to carry out > the necessary steps to implement the incorporation of the given GE in the > architecture of the application. > > > 2) in D (Lab usage) we give higher score to a SME that decided to > create its own cloud. Could we be a bit more precise on this? For example a > SME could just use the IaaS Resurce Management GE (based on Openstack) and > create its own cloud claiming the same score of another SME that is > providing a fully fledged FIWARE instance. > > > Yes we have assigned more score to a SME/startup who decides to setup > its own cloud based on FIWARE Cloud GEs. But also to those who will setup > an environment on a FIWARE Cloud (e.g., the FIWARE Lab) allowing others to > instantiate the application. > > I will go for keeping things like they are. > > 2.1) Always related to D: the questionnaire and the scorecard are > providing different questions. The questionnaire gives 3 points in case of > a dedicated cloud and 4 for the usage of blueprint for deploying the app > whereas the scorecard gives 3 for planning and 4 for implementation. > > > I believe you are wrong. The questionnaire allows you to get 3pts (or > 4pts) when either you have planned (or implemented) to setup your own Cloud > environment or you have setup blueprints, etc allowing 3rd parties to > deploy the application in one single click. > > 3) F (Degree of integration) is never used. Am I wrong? Is it made on > purpose? > > > It is made on purpose. This is a question to be assessed by the > coaches based on analysis of the response given. > > 4) Big Data: here the difference between the second and the third > questions is about "cluster" as opposed to "platform". Is it correct? What > do we mean with "cluster" in this context? And with "platform"? Does it > make sense to deploy Cosmos GE as "not a cluster". In my opinion yes but it > is a trivial deployment (not suitable for Hadoop purposes). Or do we mean > "hadoop federation" using the term "cluster"? I think this deserve a > clarification. > > > This should be clear for any user of Cosmos. Cosmos is intended to > allow people to setup Hadoop clusters dynamically, so once the BigData > analysis being carried out finishes, the resources are freed. > > > > Last but not least: I totally support the proposal of Frank to have a > common tool. It provides an uniform interface and speed up things. My > questions are: > > a) you Frank need the list of SMEs + contact information. I image in > order to configure the tool to send emails to the SMEs. Is it correct? > > -> Yes. See my other e.mail > > b) then we as coaches can check the answers provided and in case remind > the SMEs, that did not yet respond, asking the tool to send a reminder. > Correct? > > -> Yes. I can even create account for the one willing to have a hand on > the tool > > c) does the tool provide automatically also the evaluation and the scoring > of the answers? I mean the calculation? > > -> The tool can. It would request me some additional hours to set this but > nothing impossible > > d) what do we as coaches have to do in order to use this tool? > > -> It depends what you want to do (from managing your own pool of SMEs or > simply accessing the results). I could do a rapid webinar to show how to > play with it. > > > I have already commented on the tool. My take would be to use it just > to gather the yes/planned/no responses and therefore make it easier to > generate a spreadsheet in google docs with the self-assessment by all > SMEs/startups. > > Best regards, > > -- Juanjo > > > > > Thanks in advance and best regards, > > silvio > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Juanjo Hierro < > juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com> wrote: > > Dear all, > > I have carried out a final review of the questionnaire and the > evaluation scorecard to be used for the assessment on the usage of FIWARE > by SMEs/startups under the FIWARE Accelerator programme. > > I will post a message on basecamp announcing that we will launch the > assessment process based on the proposed questionnaire and scorecard (which > I have updated after this final review) tomorrow around 16:00 unless I hear > any objections from you. Therefore, please, take your time to review > it. I would appreciate if you also response to this email providing a > confirmation that you have actually reviewed both tools and agree with the > proposed changes. > > I have incorporated the following changes both in the questionnaire and > scorecard: > > - I have setup a distinction between "planned" usage and "actual" > usage (the app has already implemented the criteria). Therefore, the > previous values where 0 (does NOT support either A or B), 1 (supports A) > and 2 (supports B) translate into values 0 (does not plan to support either > A or B), 1 (plans to support A), 2 (already implements A), 3 (plans to > support B), 4 (already implements B). My initial idea was to consider > scores 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2, but it happens that google docs lead to > problems if you use numbers with decimals, so I went for having 0 to 4. > - I have modified the meaning of values assigned as scores regarding > context information management so that 3-4 points are given when > integration with 3rd party systems as context information sources is > considered. Previously, we were giving maximum points if historic context > information was registered in Cosmos for further analysis. In line with > this change, I have modified the scoring regarding usage of the Cosmos > BigData GE so that the 1-2 points (previously 1 point) are given when > historic context information data is registered in Cosmos for further > analysis. > - I have aligned the meaning of values assigned for scoring usage of > Wirecloud to the other GEs (CEP, Kurento, etc), so that 1-2 points > (previously 1 point) are given when the GE is used and 3-4 points > (previously 2 points) are given when it is used managing context > information. > - I introduced several editorial comments on the questionnaire so that > it becomes more readable and better aligned with the scorecard. > > > I have created final versions of both the "Questionnaire for FIWARE > Usage Assessment" and the "FIWARE Usage Assessment scorecard". I have > also make sure both get aligned. > > The final version of the "Questionnaire for FIWARE Usage Assessment" > will be here: > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BOv96zNeytDoPMecfFBuUDmisiLxlQKJUADIbtp8XKw/edit# > > > > The final version of the "FIWARE Usage Assessment scorecard" will be > here: > > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Dijrn2gUsU0-dPhVqE9RXKi6MKkLnBVn_3YUEQWvCSs/edit?usp=sharing > > > Cheers, > > -- Juanjo > > > > ______________________________________________________ > > > > Coordinator and Chief Architect, FIWARE platform > > CTO Industrial IoT, Telef?nica > > > > email: juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com > > twitter: @JuanjoHierro > > > > You can follow FIWARE at: > > website: http://www.fiware.org > > twitter: @FIWARE > > facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > > linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > > ------------------------------ > > > Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, > puede contener informaci?n privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso > exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el > destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilizaci?n, > divulgaci?n y/o copia sin autorizaci?n puede estar prohibida en virtud de > la legislaci?n vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos > que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma v?a y proceda a su > destrucci?n. > > The information contained in this transmission is privileged and > confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or > entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended > recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or > copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received > this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the > sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete > it. > > Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinat?rio, > pode conter informa??o privilegiada ou confidencial e ? para uso exclusivo > da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se n?o ? vossa senhoria o destinat?rio > indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utiliza??o, divulga??o e/ou > c?pia sem autoriza??o pode estar proibida em virtude da legisla??o vigente. > Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique > imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destrui??o > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-coaches mailing list > Fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org > https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-coaches > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, > puede contener informaci?n privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso > exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el > destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilizaci?n, > divulgaci?n y/o copia sin autorizaci?n puede estar prohibida en virtud de > la legislaci?n vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos > que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma v?a y proceda a su > destrucci?n. > > The information contained in this transmission is privileged and > confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or > entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended > recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or > copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received > this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the > sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete > it. > > Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinat?rio, > pode conter informa??o privilegiada ou confidencial e ? para uso exclusivo > da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se n?o ? vossa senhoria o destinat?rio > indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utiliza??o, divulga??o e/ou > c?pia sem autoriza??o pode estar proibida em virtude da legisla??o vigente. > Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique > imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destrui??o > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From silvio.cretti at create-net.org Thu Jul 16 10:20:06 2015 From: silvio.cretti at create-net.org (Silvio Cretti) Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 10:20:06 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] FRANK: IMPORTANT FINAL CHECK BY FIWARE COACHES of questionnaire and evaluation dashboard to be used for FIWARE usage assessment In-Reply-To: <55A726BB.3050300@telefonica.com> References: <55A6246C.9090302@telefonica.com> <55A62A1C.50205@telefonica.com> <620dec9f26e54a9489f59140fa794ba8@winhexbeeu17.win.mail> <55A726BB.3050300@telefonica.com> Message-ID: Hi all, apart from the usage of one or the other tool, I din't understand if the original idea was to ask the SMEs to fill in both the questionnaire doc and the scorecard spreadsheet. Why do they need to ask them to fill in the spreadsheet for a self-assessment? Isn't it something we could derive quickly (maybe also automatically if we are going to use a tool) from the questionnaire? My proposal is this: 1) either use the questionnaire doc and then the coaches will do the evaluation 2) or use an automatic tool that offers the questionnaire doc as an "online" form (if there are problem with textual responses maybe attachments can be used) and that can provide a first automatic evaluation based on the scorecard. Last question (due probably to the fact that I didn't attend the last telcos): after completing the gathering of the answers, what are the next steps? I mean do we plan to have two evaluations (one based on the answers from the SMEs - yes/no/planned- and another, made by the FIWARE experts, based also on the text/attachments provided) or just one? How are we going to used the "textual" part provided? Thanks in advance and best regards, silvio On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 5:36 AM, Juanjo Hierro < juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com> wrote: > > On 15/07/15 19:20, Franck Le Gall wrote: > > Hello > > > > Some points: > > > > #1 I can for sure transfer the questionnaire to the on-line tool. I > quickly transferred the 2 first set of questions here: > http://survey.eglobalmark.com/index.php/survey/index/sid/825872/newtest/Y/lang/en > > It is currently available to anybody for test. > > > > Feedback welcome > > > I like the idea about the survey tool ... however my concern is about > the editing possibilities for fields dealing with explanations ... > particularly in terms of adding some figures (pictures) that may be helpful > for explaining the ideas or in terms of styles for paragraphs of the > explanations. As an example, what if someone wishes to add a bullet list > as part of their definition? > > Any thoughts about how these issues may be overcome? Would simply copy > and paste of a figure, or a piece of text, work? I have tried but I > didn't succeed. > > Does the tool allow to end the questionnaire adding some word file? > I'm asking this because then one possibility could be to use the survey > tool to gather just the info about the self-assessment (collection of > yes/planned/no responses) instead of passing them a google docs spreadsheet > template they have to download, complete and submit. > > I would go for using this questionnaire tool for gathering input about > the self-assessment, provided that a document with the complete response > can be attached. Please confirm this is feasible. > > > > #2 To move efficiently and track the respondents, I strongly suggest to > use the mailing capabilities of the tool from which we could send > personalized invitations as well as reminders to the one who did not answers > > > > => For that purpose, I would need the following table: Accelerator | SME > name | Contact firstname | Contact lastname | Contact e.mail > > => If some coach prefer to manage their own instance of the survey this is > doable > > > Unfortunately, I'm afraid the info you request might be difficult to > gather and some of the FIWARE accelerator projects seem like they don't > want to share that info if they have it. What i can tell is that there is > a mailing list (fiware-entrepreneurs at lists.fiware.org) where many of the > entrepreneurs that are associated to some FIWARE Accelerator project are > subscribed. It is true that the list also include additional > entrepreneurs, not necessary associated to a FIWARE Accelerator project, > who have expressed their interest to be informed about developments > regarding FIWARE. > > I wonder whether that would help or we should create the requested > table. If so, then we only have the chance to ask for such a table to > Ogilvy who is intended to build it (indeed, we populated the > fiware-entrepreneurs mailing list based on the table they had). > > > > #3 I suggest to put most of the questions as mandatory to be answered. OK ? > > > I agree. Indeed I believe all the questions should be mandatory (with > the exception of the question on SEs since there may be applications that > may not use SEs at all). > > > > #4 Our survey tool currently run under our domain name (eglobalmark.com). > If we want him to run under FIWARE, I would either need a LAMP hosting on > FIWARE side or redirecting a FIWARE sub-domain DNS to our server. > > > If we go for using the survey tool to gather the self-assessment by > responders, then I can arrange the assignment of a LAMP server linked to > the FIWARE website domain. If we provide a VM with a LAMP stack already > deployed and configured, would that be enough? > > Cheers, > > -- Juanjo > > > > > > > > Kind regards > > Franck > > > > > > > > > > *De :* fiware-coaches-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [ > mailto:fiware-coaches-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org > ] *De la part de* Juanjo Hierro > *Envoy? :* mercredi 15 juillet 2015 11:39 > *? :* fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org > *Objet :* [Fiware-coaches] FRANK: IMPORTANT FINAL CHECK BY FIWARE COACHES > of questionnaire and evaluation dashboard to be used for FIWARE usage > assessment > > > > Hi, > > A question to Frank ... are we going to finally create a questionnaire > using some sort of tool like the one you mentioned in our last confcall or > should we ask each SME/startup to make their own copy of the questionnaire, > answer it and send it to the corresponding coach? > > I need an urgent answer to this so that I can take it into consideration > for the message I would like to post on Basecamp. > > For the rest, don't forget to review my previous email (again attached > for your convenience. > > Cheers, > > -- Juanjo > > > > On 15/07/15 11:14, Juanjo Hierro wrote: > > Dear all, > > I have carried out a final review of the questionnaire and the > evaluation scorecard to be used for the assessment on the usage of FIWARE > by SMEs/startups under the FIWARE Accelerator programme. > > I will post a message on basecamp announcing that we will launch the > assessment process based on the proposed questionnaire and scorecard (which > I have updated after this final review) tomorrow around 16:00 unless I hear > any objections from you. Therefore, please, take your time to review > it. I would appreciate if you also response to this email providing a > confirmation that you have actually reviewed both tools and agree with the > proposed changes. > > I have incorporated the following changes both in the questionnaire and > scorecard: > > - I have setup a distinction between "planned" usage and "actual" > usage (the app has already implemented the criteria). Therefore, the > previous values where 0 (does NOT support either A or B), 1 (supports A) > and 2 (supports B) translate into values 0 (does not plan to support either > A or B), 1 (plans to support A), 2 (already implements A), 3 (plans to > support B), 4 (already implements B). My initial idea was to consider > scores 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2, but it happens that google docs lead to > problems if you use numbers with decimals, so I went for having 0 to 4. > - I have modified the meaning of values assigned as scores regarding > context information management so that 3-4 points are given when > integration with 3rd party systems as context information sources is > considered. Previously, we were giving maximum points if historic context > information was registered in Cosmos for further analysis. In line with > this change, I have modified the scoring regarding usage of the Cosmos > BigData GE so that the 1-2 points (previously 1 point) are given when > historic context information data is registered in Cosmos for further > analysis. > - I have aligned the meaning of values assigned for scoring usage of > Wirecloud to the other GEs (CEP, Kurento, etc), so that 1-2 points > (previously 1 point) are given when the GE is used and 3-4 points > (previously 2 points) are given when it is used managing context > information. > - I introduced several editorial comments on the questionnaire so that > it becomes more readable and better aligned with the scorecard. > > > I have created final versions of both the "Questionnaire for FIWARE > Usage Assessment" and the "FIWARE Usage Assessment scorecard". I have > also make sure both get aligned. > > The final version of the "Questionnaire for FIWARE Usage Assessment" > will be here: > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BOv96zNeytDoPMecfFBuUDmisiLxlQKJUADIbtp8XKw/edit# > > > > The final version of the "FIWARE Usage Assessment scorecard" will be > here: > > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Dijrn2gUsU0-dPhVqE9RXKi6MKkLnBVn_3YUEQWvCSs/edit?usp=sharing > > > Cheers, > > -- Juanjo > > > > ______________________________________________________ > > > > Coordinator and Chief Architect, FIWARE platform > > CTO Industrial IoT, Telef?nica > > > > email: juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com > > twitter: @JuanjoHierro > > > > You can follow FIWARE at: > > website: http://www.fiware.org > > twitter: @FIWARE > > facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > > linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > > ------------------------------ > > > Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, > puede contener informaci?n privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso > exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el > destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilizaci?n, > divulgaci?n y/o copia sin autorizaci?n puede estar prohibida en virtud de > la legislaci?n vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos > que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma v?a y proceda a su > destrucci?n. > > The information contained in this transmission is privileged and > confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or > entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended > recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or > copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received > this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the > sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete > it. > > Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinat?rio, > pode conter informa??o privilegiada ou confidencial e ? para uso exclusivo > da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se n?o ? vossa senhoria o destinat?rio > indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utiliza??o, divulga??o e/ou > c?pia sem autoriza??o pode estar proibida em virtude da legisla??o vigente. > Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique > imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destrui??o > > > > ------------------------------ > > Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, > puede contener informaci?n privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso > exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el > destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilizaci?n, > divulgaci?n y/o copia sin autorizaci?n puede estar prohibida en virtud de > la legislaci?n vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos > que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma v?a y proceda a su > destrucci?n. > > The information contained in this transmission is privileged and > confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or > entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended > recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or > copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received > this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the > sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete > it. > > Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinat?rio, > pode conter informa??o privilegiada ou confidencial e ? para uso exclusivo > da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se n?o ? vossa senhoria o destinat?rio > indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utiliza??o, divulga??o e/ou > c?pia sem autoriza??o pode estar proibida em virtude da legisla??o vigente. > Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique > imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destrui??o > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-coaches mailing list > Fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org > https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-coaches > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From leandro.guillen at imdea.org Thu Jul 16 14:59:34 2015 From: leandro.guillen at imdea.org (Leandro Guillen) Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 14:59:34 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] IMPORTANT FINAL CHECK BY FIWARE COACHES of questionnaire and evaluation dashboard to be used for FIWARE usage assessment In-Reply-To: <55A6246C.9090302@telefonica.com> References: <55A6246C.9090302@telefonica.com> Message-ID: <55A7AAB6.3080806@imdea.org> Hi all, I agree with the changes. For the record, I removed a column in the assessment spreadsheet and adjusted the total score one to reflect the changes. That was just to help make sense of the sum of the points. Regards, Leandro El 15/07/15 a las 11:14, Juanjo Hierro escribi?: > Dear all, > > I have carried out a final review of the questionnaire and the > evaluation scorecard to be used for the assessment on the usage of > FIWARE by SMEs/startups under the FIWARE Accelerator programme. > > I will post a message on basecamp announcing that we will launch the > assessment process based on the proposed questionnaire and scorecard > (which I have updated after this final review) tomorrow around 16:00 > unless I hear any objections from you. Therefore, please, take your > time to review it. I would appreciate if you also response to this > email providing a confirmation that you have actually reviewed both > tools and agree with the proposed changes. > > I have incorporated the following changes both in the questionnaire > and scorecard: > > * I have setup a distinction between "planned" usage and "actual" > usage (the app has already implemented the criteria). Therefore, > the previous values where 0 (does NOT support either A or B), 1 > (supports A) and 2 (supports B) translate into values 0 (does not > plan to support either A or B), 1 (plans to support A), 2 (already > implements A), 3 (plans to support B), 4 (already implements B). > My initial idea was to consider scores 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2, but > it happens that google docs lead to problems if you use numbers > with decimals, so I went for having 0 to 4. > * I have modified the meaning of values assigned as scores regarding > context information management so that 3-4 points are given when > integration with 3rd party systems as context information sources > is considered. Previously, we were giving maximum points if > historic context information was registered in Cosmos for further > analysis. In line with this change, I have modified the scoring > regarding usage of the Cosmos BigData GE so that the 1-2 points > (previously 1 point) are given when historic context information > data is registered in Cosmos for further analysis. > * I have aligned the meaning of values assigned for scoring usage of > Wirecloud to the other GEs (CEP, Kurento, etc), so that 1-2 points > (previously 1 point) are given when the GE is used and 3-4 points > (previously 2 points) are given when it is used managing context > information. > * I introduced several editorial comments on the questionnaire so > that it becomes more readable and better aligned with the scorecard. > > > I have created final versions of both the "Questionnaire for FIWARE > Usage Assessment" and the "FIWARE Usage Assessment scorecard". I > have also make sure both get aligned. > > The final version of the "Questionnaire for FIWARE Usage Assessment" > will be here: > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BOv96zNeytDoPMecfFBuUDmisiLxlQKJUADIbtp8XKw/edit# > > > The final version of the "FIWARE Usage Assessment scorecard" will be > here: > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Dijrn2gUsU0-dPhVqE9RXKi6MKkLnBVn_3YUEQWvCSs/edit?usp=sharing > > > Cheers, > -- Juanjo > > ______________________________________________________ > > Coordinator and Chief Architect, FIWARE platform > CTO Industrial IoT, Telef?nica > > email:juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com > twitter: @JuanjoHierro > > You can follow FIWARE at: > website:http://www.fiware.org > twitter: @FIWARE > facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su > destinatario, puede contener informaci?n privilegiada o confidencial y > es para uso exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es > usted. el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, > utilizaci?n, divulgaci?n y/o copia sin autorizaci?n puede estar > prohibida en virtud de la legislaci?n vigente. Si ha recibido este > mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por > esta misma v?a y proceda a su destrucci?n. > > The information contained in this transmission is privileged and > confidential information intended only for the use of the individual > or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the > intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. > If you have received this transmission in error, do not read it. > Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this > communication in error and then delete it. > > Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu > destinat?rio, pode conter informa??o privilegiada ou confidencial e ? > para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se n?o ? vossa > senhoria o destinat?rio indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, > utiliza??o, divulga??o e/ou c?pia sem autoriza??o pode estar proibida > em virtude da legisla??o vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, > rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e > proceda a sua destrui??o > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-coaches mailing list > Fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org > https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-coaches -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From franck.le-gall at eglobalmark.com Fri Jul 17 09:30:19 2015 From: franck.le-gall at eglobalmark.com (Franck Le Gall) Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 07:30:19 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] FRANK: IMPORTANT FINAL CHECK BY FIWARE COACHES of questionnaire and evaluation dashboard to be used for FIWARE usage assessment In-Reply-To: <55A726BB.3050300@telefonica.com> References: <55A6246C.9090302@telefonica.com> <55A62A1C.50205@telefonica.com> <620dec9f26e54a9489f59140fa794ba8@winhexbeeu17.win.mail> <55A726BB.3050300@telefonica.com> Message-ID: Hello, #1 -> I added a more advanced editor for the ?free text? questions -> I added a question at the end to allow the upload of files. Please have a look: http://survey.eglobalmark.com/index.php/survey/index/sid/825872/newtest/Y/lang/en #2 If we want simply to collect the yes/planned/no answers then presentation of the survey could be simplified by showing all aggregated in one table #3 Regarding collection of names and e.mail addresses, I assume each coach should be able to gather this easily. I personally have most names and contacts of companies I am following. #4 To deploy the tool, a SSH root access to a LAMP server should be OK. Potential issues are with the mailing as PHP scripts will need to be able to send e.mail. Also make sure that hosting is production level (not in FIWARE lab) to avoid drops in the service while survey is running. Franck De : Juanjo Hierro [mailto:juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com] Envoy? : jeudi 16 juillet 2015 05:36 ? : Franck Le Gall; fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org Objet : Re: [Fiware-coaches] FRANK: IMPORTANT FINAL CHECK BY FIWARE COACHES of questionnaire and evaluation dashboard to be used for FIWARE usage assessment On 15/07/15 19:20, Franck Le Gall wrote: Hello Some points: #1 I can for sure transfer the questionnaire to the on-line tool. I quickly transferred the 2 first set of questions here: http://survey.eglobalmark.com/index.php/survey/index/sid/825872/newtest/Y/lang/en It is currently available to anybody for test. Feedback welcome I like the idea about the survey tool ... however my concern is about the editing possibilities for fields dealing with explanations ... particularly in terms of adding some figures (pictures) that may be helpful for explaining the ideas or in terms of styles for paragraphs of the explanations. As an example, what if someone wishes to add a bullet list as part of their definition? Any thoughts about how these issues may be overcome? Would simply copy and paste of a figure, or a piece of text, work? I have tried but I didn't succeed. Does the tool allow to end the questionnaire adding some word file? I'm asking this because then one possibility could be to use the survey tool to gather just the info about the self-assessment (collection of yes/planned/no responses) instead of passing them a google docs spreadsheet template they have to download, complete and submit. I would go for using this questionnaire tool for gathering input about the self-assessment, provided that a document with the complete response can be attached. Please confirm this is feasible. #2 To move efficiently and track the respondents, I strongly suggest to use the mailing capabilities of the tool from which we could send personalized invitations as well as reminders to the one who did not answers => For that purpose, I would need the following table: Accelerator | SME name | Contact firstname | Contact lastname | Contact e.mail => If some coach prefer to manage their own instance of the survey this is doable Unfortunately, I'm afraid the info you request might be difficult to gather and some of the FIWARE accelerator projects seem like they don't want to share that info if they have it. What i can tell is that there is a mailing list (fiware-entrepreneurs at lists.fiware.org) where many of the entrepreneurs that are associated to some FIWARE Accelerator project are subscribed. It is true that the list also include additional entrepreneurs, not necessary associated to a FIWARE Accelerator project, who have expressed their interest to be informed about developments regarding FIWARE. I wonder whether that would help or we should create the requested table. If so, then we only have the chance to ask for such a table to Ogilvy who is intended to build it (indeed, we populated the fiware-entrepreneurs mailing list based on the table they had). #3 I suggest to put most of the questions as mandatory to be answered. OK ? I agree. Indeed I believe all the questions should be mandatory (with the exception of the question on SEs since there may be applications that may not use SEs at all). #4 Our survey tool currently run under our domain name (eglobalmark.com). If we want him to run under FIWARE, I would either need a LAMP hosting on FIWARE side or redirecting a FIWARE sub-domain DNS to our server. If we go for using the survey tool to gather the self-assessment by responders, then I can arrange the assignment of a LAMP server linked to the FIWARE website domain. If we provide a VM with a LAMP stack already deployed and configured, would that be enough? Cheers, -- Juanjo Kind regards Franck De : fiware-coaches-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [mailto:fiware-coaches-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] De la part de Juanjo Hierro Envoy? : mercredi 15 juillet 2015 11:39 ? : fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org Objet : [Fiware-coaches] FRANK: IMPORTANT FINAL CHECK BY FIWARE COACHES of questionnaire and evaluation dashboard to be used for FIWARE usage assessment Hi, A question to Frank ... are we going to finally create a questionnaire using some sort of tool like the one you mentioned in our last confcall or should we ask each SME/startup to make their own copy of the questionnaire, answer it and send it to the corresponding coach? I need an urgent answer to this so that I can take it into consideration for the message I would like to post on Basecamp. For the rest, don't forget to review my previous email (again attached for your convenience. Cheers, -- Juanjo On 15/07/15 11:14, Juanjo Hierro wrote: Dear all, I have carried out a final review of the questionnaire and the evaluation scorecard to be used for the assessment on the usage of FIWARE by SMEs/startups under the FIWARE Accelerator programme. I will post a message on basecamp announcing that we will launch the assessment process based on the proposed questionnaire and scorecard (which I have updated after this final review) tomorrow around 16:00 unless I hear any objections from you. Therefore, please, take your time to review it. I would appreciate if you also response to this email providing a confirmation that you have actually reviewed both tools and agree with the proposed changes. I have incorporated the following changes both in the questionnaire and scorecard: * I have setup a distinction between "planned" usage and "actual" usage (the app has already implemented the criteria). Therefore, the previous values where 0 (does NOT support either A or B), 1 (supports A) and 2 (supports B) translate into values 0 (does not plan to support either A or B), 1 (plans to support A), 2 (already implements A), 3 (plans to support B), 4 (already implements B). My initial idea was to consider scores 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2, but it happens that google docs lead to problems if you use numbers with decimals, so I went for having 0 to 4. * I have modified the meaning of values assigned as scores regarding context information management so that 3-4 points are given when integration with 3rd party systems as context information sources is considered. Previously, we were giving maximum points if historic context information was registered in Cosmos for further analysis. In line with this change, I have modified the scoring regarding usage of the Cosmos BigData GE so that the 1-2 points (previously 1 point) are given when historic context information data is registered in Cosmos for further analysis. * I have aligned the meaning of values assigned for scoring usage of Wirecloud to the other GEs (CEP, Kurento, etc), so that 1-2 points (previously 1 point) are given when the GE is used and 3-4 points (previously 2 points) are given when it is used managing context information. * I introduced several editorial comments on the questionnaire so that it becomes more readable and better aligned with the scorecard. I have created final versions of both the "Questionnaire for FIWARE Usage Assessment" and the "FIWARE Usage Assessment scorecard". I have also make sure both get aligned. The final version of the "Questionnaire for FIWARE Usage Assessment" will be here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BOv96zNeytDoPMecfFBuUDmisiLxlQKJUADIbtp8XKw/edit# The final version of the "FIWARE Usage Assessment scorecard" will be here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Dijrn2gUsU0-dPhVqE9RXKi6MKkLnBVn_3YUEQWvCSs/edit?usp=sharing Cheers, -- Juanjo ______________________________________________________ Coordinator and Chief Architect, FIWARE platform CTO Industrial IoT, Telef?nica email: juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com twitter: @JuanjoHierro You can follow FIWARE at: website: http://www.fiware.org twitter: @FIWARE facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, puede contener informaci?n privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilizaci?n, divulgaci?n y/o copia sin autorizaci?n puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislaci?n vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma v?a y proceda a su destrucci?n. The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete it. Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinat?rio, pode conter informa??o privilegiada ou confidencial e ? para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se n?o ? vossa senhoria o destinat?rio indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utiliza??o, divulga??o e/ou c?pia sem autoriza??o pode estar proibida em virtude da legisla??o vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destrui??o ________________________________ Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, puede contener informaci?n privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilizaci?n, divulgaci?n y/o copia sin autorizaci?n puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislaci?n vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma v?a y proceda a su destrucci?n. The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete it. Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinat?rio, pode conter informa??o privilegiada ou confidencial e ? para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se n?o ? vossa senhoria o destinat?rio indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utiliza??o, divulga??o e/ou c?pia sem autoriza??o pode estar proibida em virtude da legisla??o vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destrui??o -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ilknur.chulani at atos.net Tue Jul 21 15:39:11 2015 From: ilknur.chulani at atos.net (Chulani, Ilknur) Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 13:39:11 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] Accelerator question regarding support for Cosmos GE Message-ID: Dear Sergio and Stefano, One of the accelerators is asking me if it is true that TID is not going to support Cosmos anymore. I do not remember any official news regarding this, do you know anything about it? Cc?ying other coaches just in case they get the same question.. Thanks & kind regards, ilknur Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 2:56 PM To: Chulani, Ilknur Subject: Cosmos GE Dear Ilknur We have received news that Telefonica is not going to give support about Cosmos GE, do you know it? BR Carmen Bu mesaj ve ekleri g?nderilen ki?iye ?zeldir ve gizli bilgiler i?erebilir. E?er mesaj?n g?nderilmek istendi?i ki?i de?ilseniz l?tfen kopyalamay?n?z, ba?kalar?na g?ndermeyiniz ve g?ndericiyi bilgilendiriniz. Internet ?zerinden g?nderilen mesajlar?n g?venli ve hatas?z oldu?unun garantisi olmad???ndan Atos grubu mesaj?n i?eri?inden sorumlu tutulamaz. G?ndericinin bilgisayar? anti-vir?s sistemleri taraf?ndan taranmaktad?r, ancak yine de mesaj?n vir?s i?ermedi?i garanti edilemez ve g?nderici, meydana gelebilecek zararlardan sorumlu tutulamaz. This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavors to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From thierry.nagellen at orange.com Tue Jul 21 16:02:42 2015 From: thierry.nagellen at orange.com (thierry.nagellen at orange.com) Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 14:02:42 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] Accelerator question regarding support for Cosmos GE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <19571_1437487364_55AE5104_19571_2760_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925CCCD16E@OPEXCLILM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> Hi Ilknur, Yes I received the same question/request from European Pioneer and it could put lots of trouble during the review. BR Thierry De : fiware-coaches-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [mailto:fiware-coaches-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] De la part de Chulani, Ilknur Envoy? : mardi 21 juillet 2015 15:39 ? : SERGIO GARCIA GOMEZ; stefano de panfilis Cc : fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org Objet : [Fiware-coaches] Accelerator question regarding support for Cosmos GE Dear Sergio and Stefano, One of the accelerators is asking me if it is true that TID is not going to support Cosmos anymore. I do not remember any official news regarding this, do you know anything about it? Cc?ying other coaches just in case they get the same question.. Thanks & kind regards, ilknur Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 2:56 PM To: Chulani, Ilknur Subject: Cosmos GE Dear Ilknur We have received news that Telefonica is not going to give support about Cosmos GE, do you know it? BR Carmen Bu mesaj ve ekleri g?nderilen ki?iye ?zeldir ve gizli bilgiler i?erebilir. E?er mesaj?n g?nderilmek istendi?i ki?i de?ilseniz l?tfen kopyalamay?n?z, ba?kalar?na g?ndermeyiniz ve g?ndericiyi bilgilendiriniz. Internet ?zerinden g?nderilen mesajlar?n g?venli ve hatas?z oldu?unun garantisi olmad???ndan Atos grubu mesaj?n i?eri?inden sorumlu tutulamaz. G?ndericinin bilgisayar? anti-vir?s sistemleri taraf?ndan taranmaktad?r, ancak yine de mesaj?n vir?s i?ermedi?i garanti edilemez ve g?nderici, meydana gelebilecek zararlardan sorumlu tutulamaz. This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavors to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com Wed Jul 22 15:17:51 2015 From: juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 15:17:51 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] Accelerator question regarding support for Cosmos GE In-Reply-To: <19571_1437487364_55AE5104_19571_2760_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925CCCD16E@OPEXCLILM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> References: <19571_1437487364_55AE5104_19571_2760_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925CCCD16E@OPEXCLILM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> Message-ID: <55AF97FF.3060107@telefonica.com> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com Wed Jul 22 15:24:13 2015 From: juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 15:24:13 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] Accelerator question regarding support for Cosmos GE In-Reply-To: <55AF97FF.3060107@telefonica.com> References: <19571_1437487364_55AE5104_19571_2760_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925CCCD16E@OPEXCLILM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <55AF97FF.3060107@telefonica.com> Message-ID: <55AF997D.2060707@telefonica.com> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Wed Jul 22 17:27:23 2015 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:27:23 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] Accelerator question regarding support for Cosmos GE In-Reply-To: <55AF997D.2060707@telefonica.com> References: <19571_1437487364_55AE5104_19571_2760_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925CCCD16E@OPEXCLILM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <55AF97FF.3060107@telefonica.com> <55AF997D.2060707@telefonica.com> Message-ID: dear juanjo, these are great news which for me are clarifing very well the situation :-) however, please bear in mind that the documentation in the catalogue is not up-to-date and that several smes are wishing to install it (wrong or correct this does not matter too much) and following the current installation guidelines the installation does not work as reported in several emails from smes. ciao, stefano 2015-07-22 15:24 GMT+02:00 Juanjo Hierro : > Hi, > > (Please replace my previous mail with this one, more complete (I > accidentally click on send too early :-) > > We don't understand how this message about Telef?nica discontinuing > support of Cosmos has been disseminated. Let me clarify: > > - Cosmos continues being the product that Telef?nica supports as > implementation of the Big Data enabler. In fact, last months Telef?nica > released a number of components/tools that are helping growth of the > ?Cosmos ecosystem?, targeted to reinforce integration with other relevant > FIWARE GEs: > - Cygnus, for historical context data persistence. > - Tidoop-ext, allowing using CKAN open data as input data for > Hadoop. > - Tidoop-mr, a library of general purpose MapReduce jobs ready to > be used. > - Even, we have moved to an OAuth2-based authentication and > authorization for those REST APIs exposed in Hadoop. > - Cosmos, as a live product, continuously evolves and this means > changes. Sustainability of the whole product is one of the key aspects in > mind when taking decisions about his evolution. In this respect, one of > the changes we have introduced in Cosmos is about adopting Openstack?s > Sahara as the core of the "Hadoop as a Service" engine of the Cosmos GE, > replacing a development that Telef?nica had made supporting that > functionality when nothing like Sahara was available. Reasons for this > change are several, but the most important ones are: > - Sahara natively integrates with Openstack, the virtualization > infrastructure used in FIWARE, therefore the "Hadoop as a Service" engine > would be much better integrated with OpenStack-based clouds like the FIWARE > Lab. Based on DevStack, we will be also available to support this "Hadoop > as a Service" functionality standalone (without requiring to deploy and > setup a complete Cloud) on a number of dedicated servers. > - Sahara offers at least the same functionality offered by the > initial software to support "Hadoop as a Service" functionality developed > by Telef?nica. That part of the product was fine when no technologies > like Sahara were available. Now, it has no sense to continue with it, and > it is more interesting for us (and the community of developers) to > contribute to Sahara, reinforcing sustainability in the longer term.. > - Anyways, our experience says most SME and startups just need Hadoop > for performing data analysis. Deploying the "Hadoop as Service" > functionality is only required by a few of them. For those who do not > require to deploy that service, even installing Sahara has no sense since > that would be as killing flies with cannons. As part of our support, > Telef?nica is recommending these SMEs/startups who don't require a "Hadoop > as a Service" functionality to go for any of the following two options: > - To use the shared Hadoop cluster available at FIWARE Lab. This > global instance has no 24x7 support nor production-like SLAs as it happens > with the rest of the FIWARE Lab service. However, Telef?nica's team is > committed to provide its best to support in time, whenever issues are > reported. We believe that the performance for this support is good. > - If the above is not enough and you are looking for a production > environment, then you will need to install Hadoop in your own > infrastructure by using any of the available distributions. In this > case, Telef?nica is ready to support users on installing Hadoop as well. > - Replacing the "Hadoop as a Service" engine doesn't affect at all how > applications performing map-reduce bigdata analysis is performed with > Cosmos. After all, in the new like the previous version, developers use > the Hadoop APIs (they may also rely on the rest of additional APIs/tools we > are creating as part of Cosmos, check the first bullet, but none of them > has been discontinued). > - For those few SME and startups willing to became a service provider > and aiming offering Hadoop As A Service, the new Cosmos "Hadoop as a > Service" engine based on Sahara is the right solution. > - The same infrastructure you envisioned for previous versions of > Cosmos is still valid for Sahara. > - Regarding the installation, there are several distributions > available making the task relatively easy. > - We can support SMEs/startups on installing the new version of > Cosmos relying on Sahara as the Hadoop as a Service engine. > > > Bottom line and, as you can see, *Cosmos continues being supported*. > > Best regards, > > -- Juanjo Hierro > > ______________________________________________________ > > Coordinator and Chief Architect, FIWARE platform > CTO Industrial IoT, Telef?nica > > email: juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com > twitter: @JuanjoHierro > > You can follow FIWARE at: > website: http://www.fiware.org > twitter: @FIWARE > facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > > > ------------------------------ > > Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, > puede contener informaci?n privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso > exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el > destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilizaci?n, > divulgaci?n y/o copia sin autorizaci?n puede estar prohibida en virtud de > la legislaci?n vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos > que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma v?a y proceda a su > destrucci?n. > > The information contained in this transmission is privileged and > confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or > entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended > recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or > copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received > this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the > sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete > it. > > Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinat?rio, > pode conter informa??o privilegiada ou confidencial e ? para uso exclusivo > da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se n?o ? vossa senhoria o destinat?rio > indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utiliza??o, divulga??o e/ou > c?pia sem autoriza??o pode estar proibida em virtude da legisla??o vigente. > Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique > imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destrui??o > -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-06-8759-4253 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 skype: depa01 twitter: @depa01 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com Wed Jul 22 19:30:09 2015 From: juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 19:30:09 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] FRANK: IMPORTANT FINAL CHECK BY FIWARE COACHES of questionnaire and evaluation dashboard to be used for FIWARE usage assessment In-Reply-To: References: <55A6246C.9090302@telefonica.com> <55A62A1C.50205@telefonica.com> <620dec9f26e54a9489f59140fa794ba8@winhexbeeu17.win.mail> <55A726BB.3050300@telefonica.com> Message-ID: <55AFD321.3000405@telefonica.com> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com Wed Jul 22 21:05:03 2015 From: juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 21:05:03 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] Accelerator question regarding support for Cosmos GE In-Reply-To: References: <19571_1437487364_55AE5104_19571_2760_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925CCCD16E@OPEXCLILM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <55AF97FF.3060107@telefonica.com> <55AF997D.2060707@telefonica.com> Message-ID: <55AFE95F.2090609@telefonica.com> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From franck.le-gall at eglobalmark.com Wed Jul 22 23:19:09 2015 From: franck.le-gall at eglobalmark.com (Franck Le Gall) Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 21:19:09 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] FRANK: IMPORTANT FINAL CHECK BY FIWARE COACHES of questionnaire and evaluation dashboard to be used for FIWARE usage assessment In-Reply-To: <55AFD321.3000405@telefonica.com> References: <55A6246C.9090302@telefonica.com> <55A62A1C.50205@telefonica.com> <620dec9f26e54a9489f59140fa794ba8@winhexbeeu17.win.mail> <55A726BB.3050300@telefonica.com> <55AFD321.3000405@telefonica.com> Message-ID: <2671849c05d842fcb581ab53f8ec93dd@winhexbeeu17.win.mail> Hello -> Answers can be downloaded as an excel file .See attached the file generated with some dummy answers. It can be copy/pasted to a google sheet afterward -> The scoreboard calculation could probably be made from the survey. I cannot not test it right now but will do it within few days. -> OK to add only the yes/planned/no questions only and run it from our server (as an alternative, if you tell me who is managing the fiware.org domain name at Telefonica, I can work with then to get a subdomain survey.fiware.org pointing toward our servers). However, we should not expect to receive many additional files from the company as people are in general reluctant to make efforts for the surveys. -> Regarding the ?planned? definition, here are the statements which were proposed from our FISTAR survey in relation with enablers selection ? I looked at this Enabler ? I considered the Enabler to be relevant for my application ? I integrated the Enabler into my application ? I released a version of my application that used the Enabler ? I want to sustain the use of the Enabler ? Not considered ? We could adapt this list in our case. As an example, the choices for the first question would be: Are you using the FIWARE Lab cloud hosting capabilities (VMs, Object Storage, Blueprints)? ? I use FIWARE Lab cloud hosting capabilities to run my application ? I considered using FIWARE Lab cloud hosting capabilities to run my application but do not currently use it ? I did not considered using FIWAREE lab cloud hosting capabilities Kind regards Franck De : Juanjo Hierro [mailto:juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com] Envoy? : mercredi 22 juillet 2015 19:30 ? : Franck Le Gall ; fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org Objet : Re: [Fiware-coaches] FRANK: IMPORTANT FINAL CHECK BY FIWARE COACHES of questionnaire and evaluation dashboard to be used for FIWARE usage assessment Hi, A couple of final questions regarding usage of the questionnaire tool ... Once the questionnaire is fulfilled by all the SMEs/startups ... * in which format is it going to be feasible to obtain the responses to the questionnaire provided by a given SME/entrepreneur? * Could we automate the process of filling the evaluation scorecard based on Google docs, using the info gathered through the questionnaire? Giving it a though, I believe that we may present a questionnaire where SMEs/entrepreneurs just provide the yes/planned/no answers to the questions using the questionnaire. They would be asked to attach, at the end of the questionnaire, a .docx where the rationale behind each positive response should be provided. Such document would be attached when the questionnaire is fulfilled. To make things simpler, I would suggest that for this first round (probably we will have to run an additional assessment beginning of next year) we use the questionnaire setup in the server at eglobalmark.com. Frank: could you get the questionnaire prepared? (there would not be fields for providing rationale but a .docx to be able to attach to the responses as explained earlier). As with regards with a more detailed description of "planned" I believe we should just specify a deadline for materialization of the intents. What about explaining "planned" as: "not yet implemented but already considered to be integrated as part of the architecture before end of 2015". Thoughts? Cheers, -- Juanjo ______________________________________________________ Coordinator and Chief Architect, FIWARE platform CTO Industrial IoT, Telef?nica email: juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com twitter: @JuanjoHierro You can follow FIWARE at: website: http://www.fiware.org twitter: @FIWARE facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 17/07/15 09:30, Franck Le Gall wrote: Hello, #1 -> I added a more advanced editor for the ?free text? questions -> I added a question at the end to allow the upload of files. Please have a look: http://survey.eglobalmark.com/index.php/survey/index/sid/825872/newtest/Y/lang/en #2 If we want simply to collect the yes/planned/no answers then presentation of the survey could be simplified by showing all aggregated in one table #3 Regarding collection of names and e.mail addresses, I assume each coach should be able to gather this easily. I personally have most names and contacts of companies I am following. #4 To deploy the tool, a SSH root access to a LAMP server should be OK. Potential issues are with the mailing as PHP scripts will need to be able to send e.mail. Also make sure that hosting is production level (not in FIWARE lab) to avoid drops in the service while survey is running. Franck De : Juanjo Hierro [mailto:juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com] Envoy? : jeudi 16 juillet 2015 05:36 ? : Franck Le Gall; fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org Objet : Re: [Fiware-coaches] FRANK: IMPORTANT FINAL CHECK BY FIWARE COACHES of questionnaire and evaluation dashboard to be used for FIWARE usage assessment On 15/07/15 19:20, Franck Le Gall wrote: Hello Some points: #1 I can for sure transfer the questionnaire to the on-line tool. I quickly transferred the 2 first set of questions here: http://survey.eglobalmark.com/index.php/survey/index/sid/825872/newtest/Y/lang/en It is currently available to anybody for test. Feedback welcome I like the idea about the survey tool ... however my concern is about the editing possibilities for fields dealing with explanations ... particularly in terms of adding some figures (pictures) that may be helpful for explaining the ideas or in terms of styles for paragraphs of the explanations. As an example, what if someone wishes to add a bullet list as part of their definition? Any thoughts about how these issues may be overcome? Would simply copy and paste of a figure, or a piece of text, work? I have tried but I didn't succeed. Does the tool allow to end the questionnaire adding some word file? I'm asking this because then one possibility could be to use the survey tool to gather just the info about the self-assessment (collection of yes/planned/no responses) instead of passing them a google docs spreadsheet template they have to download, complete and submit. I would go for using this questionnaire tool for gathering input about the self-assessment, provided that a document with the complete response can be attached. Please confirm this is feasible. #2 To move efficiently and track the respondents, I strongly suggest to use the mailing capabilities of the tool from which we could send personalized invitations as well as reminders to the one who did not answers => For that purpose, I would need the following table: Accelerator | SME name | Contact firstname | Contact lastname | Contact e.mail => If some coach prefer to manage their own instance of the survey this is doable Unfortunately, I'm afraid the info you request might be difficult to gather and some of the FIWARE accelerator projects seem like they don't want to share that info if they have it. What i can tell is that there is a mailing list (fiware-entrepreneurs at lists.fiware.org) where many of the entrepreneurs that are associated to some FIWARE Accelerator project are subscribed. It is true that the list also include additional entrepreneurs, not necessary associated to a FIWARE Accelerator project, who have expressed their interest to be informed about developments regarding FIWARE. I wonder whether that would help or we should create the requested table. If so, then we only have the chance to ask for such a table to Ogilvy who is intended to build it (indeed, we populated the fiware-entrepreneurs mailing list based on the table they had). #3 I suggest to put most of the questions as mandatory to be answered. OK ? I agree. Indeed I believe all the questions should be mandatory (with the exception of the question on SEs since there may be applications that may not use SEs at all). #4 Our survey tool currently run under our domain name (eglobalmark.com). If we want him to run under FIWARE, I would either need a LAMP hosting on FIWARE side or redirecting a FIWARE sub-domain DNS to our server. If we go for using the survey tool to gather the self-assessment by responders, then I can arrange the assignment of a LAMP server linked to the FIWARE website domain. If we provide a VM with a LAMP stack already deployed and configured, would that be enough? Cheers, -- Juanjo Kind regards Franck De : fiware-coaches-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [mailto:fiware-coaches-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] De la part de Juanjo Hierro Envoy? : mercredi 15 juillet 2015 11:39 ? : fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org Objet : [Fiware-coaches] FRANK: IMPORTANT FINAL CHECK BY FIWARE COACHES of questionnaire and evaluation dashboard to be used for FIWARE usage assessment Hi, A question to Frank ... are we going to finally create a questionnaire using some sort of tool like the one you mentioned in our last confcall or should we ask each SME/startup to make their own copy of the questionnaire, answer it and send it to the corresponding coach? I need an urgent answer to this so that I can take it into consideration for the message I would like to post on Basecamp. For the rest, don't forget to review my previous email (again attached for your convenience. Cheers, -- Juanjo On 15/07/15 11:14, Juanjo Hierro wrote: Dear all, I have carried out a final review of the questionnaire and the evaluation scorecard to be used for the assessment on the usage of FIWARE by SMEs/startups under the FIWARE Accelerator programme. I will post a message on basecamp announcing that we will launch the assessment process based on the proposed questionnaire and scorecard (which I have updated after this final review) tomorrow around 16:00 unless I hear any objections from you. Therefore, please, take your time to review it. I would appreciate if you also response to this email providing a confirmation that you have actually reviewed both tools and agree with the proposed changes. I have incorporated the following changes both in the questionnaire and scorecard: * I have setup a distinction between "planned" usage and "actual" usage (the app has already implemented the criteria). Therefore, the previous values where 0 (does NOT support either A or B), 1 (supports A) and 2 (supports B) translate into values 0 (does not plan to support either A or B), 1 (plans to support A), 2 (already implements A), 3 (plans to support B), 4 (already implements B). My initial idea was to consider scores 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2, but it happens that google docs lead to problems if you use numbers with decimals, so I went for having 0 to 4. * I have modified the meaning of values assigned as scores regarding context information management so that 3-4 points are given when integration with 3rd party systems as context information sources is considered. Previously, we were giving maximum points if historic context information was registered in Cosmos for further analysis. In line with this change, I have modified the scoring regarding usage of the Cosmos BigData GE so that the 1-2 points (previously 1 point) are given when historic context information data is registered in Cosmos for further analysis. * I have aligned the meaning of values assigned for scoring usage of Wirecloud to the other GEs (CEP, Kurento, etc), so that 1-2 points (previously 1 point) are given when the GE is used and 3-4 points (previously 2 points) are given when it is used managing context information. * I introduced several editorial comments on the questionnaire so that it becomes more readable and better aligned with the scorecard. I have created final versions of both the "Questionnaire for FIWARE Usage Assessment" and the "FIWARE Usage Assessment scorecard". I have also make sure both get aligned. The final version of the "Questionnaire for FIWARE Usage Assessment" will be here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BOv96zNeytDoPMecfFBuUDmisiLxlQKJUADIbtp8XKw/edit# The final version of the "FIWARE Usage Assessment scorecard" will be here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Dijrn2gUsU0-dPhVqE9RXKi6MKkLnBVn_3YUEQWvCSs/edit?usp=sharing Cheers, -- Juanjo ______________________________________________________ Coordinator and Chief Architect, FIWARE platform CTO Industrial IoT, Telef?nica email: juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com twitter: @JuanjoHierro You can follow FIWARE at: website: http://www.fiware.org twitter: @FIWARE facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, puede contener informaci?n privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilizaci?n, divulgaci?n y/o copia sin autorizaci?n puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislaci?n vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma v?a y proceda a su destrucci?n. The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete it. Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinat?rio, pode conter informa??o privilegiada ou confidencial e ? para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se n?o ? vossa senhoria o destinat?rio indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utiliza??o, divulga??o e/ou c?pia sem autoriza??o pode estar proibida em virtude da legisla??o vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destrui??o ________________________________ Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, puede contener informaci?n privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilizaci?n, divulgaci?n y/o copia sin autorizaci?n puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislaci?n vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma v?a y proceda a su destrucci?n. The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete it. Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinat?rio, pode conter informa??o privilegiada ou confidencial e ? para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se n?o ? vossa senhoria o destinat?rio indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utiliza??o, divulga??o e/ou c?pia sem autoriza??o pode estar proibida em virtude da legisla??o vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destrui??o ________________________________ Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, puede contener informaci?n privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilizaci?n, divulgaci?n y/o copia sin autorizaci?n puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislaci?n vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma v?a y proceda a su destrucci?n. The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete it. Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinat?rio, pode conter informa??o privilegiada ou confidencial e ? para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se n?o ? vossa senhoria o destinat?rio indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utiliza??o, divulga??o e/ou c?pia sem autoriza??o pode estar proibida em virtude da legisla??o vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destrui??o -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Copie de results-survey825872.xls Type: application/vnd.ms-excel Size: 27136 bytes Desc: Copie de results-survey825872.xls URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Files_for_responses_12.zip Type: application/x-zip-compressed Size: 363266 bytes Desc: Files_for_responses_12.zip URL: From juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com Thu Jul 23 05:01:03 2015 From: juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 05:01:03 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] FRANK: IMPORTANT FINAL CHECK BY FIWARE COACHES of questionnaire and evaluation dashboard to be used for FIWARE usage assessment In-Reply-To: <2671849c05d842fcb581ab53f8ec93dd@winhexbeeu17.win.mail> References: <55A6246C.9090302@telefonica.com> <55A62A1C.50205@telefonica.com> <620dec9f26e54a9489f59140fa794ba8@winhexbeeu17.win.mail> <55A726BB.3050300@telefonica.com> <55AFD321.3000405@telefonica.com> <2671849c05d842fcb581ab53f8ec93dd@winhexbeeu17.win.mail> Message-ID: <55B058EF.7000908@telefonica.com> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Explanations accompanying questions to FIWARE usage assessment questionnaire.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 21789 bytes Desc: not available URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Thu Jul 23 09:48:45 2015 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 09:48:45 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] Accelerator question regarding support for Cosmos GE In-Reply-To: <55AFE95F.2090609@telefonica.com> References: <19571_1437487364_55AE5104_19571_2760_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925CCCD16E@OPEXCLILM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <55AF97FF.3060107@telefonica.com> <55AF997D.2060707@telefonica.com> <55AFE95F.2090609@telefonica.com> Message-ID: Great! Ciao Stefano Il 22/Lug/2015 21:05, "Juanjo Hierro" ha scritto: > > Yes, you are right. We are working hard to get the information updated > on the wiki and catalogue. It should be ready in the coming days. > > Best regards, > > -- Juanjo > > ______________________________________________________ > > Coordinator and Chief Architect, FIWARE platform > CTO Industrial IoT, Telef?nica > > email: juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com > twitter: @JuanjoHierro > > You can follow FIWARE at: > website: http://www.fiware.org > twitter: @FIWARE > facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > On 22/07/15 17:27, stefano de panfilis wrote: > > dear juanjo, > > these are great news which for me are clarifing very well the situation > :-) > > however, please bear in mind that the documentation in the catalogue is > not up-to-date and that several smes are wishing to install it (wrong or > correct this does not matter too much) and following the current > installation guidelines the installation does not work as reported in > several emails from smes. > > ciao, > stefano > > 2015-07-22 15:24 GMT+02:00 Juanjo Hierro : > >> Hi, >> >> (Please replace my previous mail with this one, more complete (I >> accidentally click on send too early :-) >> >> We don't understand how this message about Telef?nica discontinuing >> support of Cosmos has been disseminated. Let me clarify: >> >> - Cosmos continues being the product that Telef?nica supports as >> implementation of the Big Data enabler. In fact, last months Telef?nica >> released a number of components/tools that are helping growth of the >> ?Cosmos ecosystem?, targeted to reinforce integration with other relevant >> FIWARE GEs: >> - Cygnus, for historical context data persistence. >> - Tidoop-ext, allowing using CKAN open data as input data for >> Hadoop. >> - Tidoop-mr, a library of general purpose MapReduce jobs ready to >> be used. >> - Even, we have moved to an OAuth2-based authentication and >> authorization for those REST APIs exposed in Hadoop. >> - Cosmos, as a live product, continuously evolves and this means >> changes. Sustainability of the whole product is one of the key aspects in >> mind when taking decisions about his evolution. In this respect, one of >> the changes we have introduced in Cosmos is about adopting Openstack?s >> Sahara as the core of the "Hadoop as a Service" engine of the Cosmos GE, >> replacing a development that Telef?nica had made supporting that >> functionality when nothing like Sahara was available. Reasons for this >> change are several, but the most important ones are: >> - Sahara natively integrates with Openstack, the virtualization >> infrastructure used in FIWARE, therefore the "Hadoop as a Service" engine >> would be much better integrated with OpenStack-based clouds like the FIWARE >> Lab. Based on DevStack, we will be also available to support this "Hadoop >> as a Service" functionality standalone (without requiring to deploy and >> setup a complete Cloud) on a number of dedicated servers. >> - Sahara offers at least the same functionality offered by the >> initial software to support "Hadoop as a Service" functionality developed >> by Telef?nica. That part of the product was fine when no technologies >> like Sahara were available. Now, it has no sense to continue with it, and >> it is more interesting for us (and the community of developers) to >> contribute to Sahara, reinforcing sustainability in the longer term.. >> - Anyways, our experience says most SME and startups just need Hadoop >> for performing data analysis. Deploying the "Hadoop as Service" >> functionality is only required by a few of them. For those who do not >> require to deploy that service, even installing Sahara has no sense since >> that would be as killing flies with cannons. As part of our support, >> Telef?nica is recommending these SMEs/startups who don't require a "Hadoop >> as a Service" functionality to go for any of the following two options: >> - To use the shared Hadoop cluster available at FIWARE Lab. This >> global instance has no 24x7 support nor production-like SLAs as it happens >> with the rest of the FIWARE Lab service. However, Telef?nica's team is >> committed to provide its best to support in time, whenever issues are >> reported. We believe that the performance for this support is good. >> - If the above is not enough and you are looking for a production >> environment, then you will need to install Hadoop in your own >> infrastructure by using any of the available distributions. In this >> case, Telef?nica is ready to support users on installing Hadoop as well. >> - Replacing the "Hadoop as a Service" engine doesn't affect at all >> how applications performing map-reduce bigdata analysis is performed with >> Cosmos. After all, in the new like the previous version, developers use >> the Hadoop APIs (they may also rely on the rest of additional APIs/tools we >> are creating as part of Cosmos, check the first bullet, but none of them >> has been discontinued). >> - For those few SME and startups willing to became a service provider >> and aiming offering Hadoop As A Service, the new Cosmos "Hadoop as a >> Service" engine based on Sahara is the right solution. >> - The same infrastructure you envisioned for previous versions of >> Cosmos is still valid for Sahara. >> - Regarding the installation, there are several distributions >> available making the task relatively easy. >> - We can support SMEs/startups on installing the new version of >> Cosmos relying on Sahara as the Hadoop as a Service engine. >> >> >> Bottom line and, as you can see, *Cosmos continues being supported*. >> >> Best regards, >> >> -- Juanjo Hierro >> >> ______________________________________________________ >> >> Coordinator and Chief Architect, FIWARE platform >> CTO Industrial IoT, Telef?nica >> >> email: juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com >> twitter: @JuanjoHierro >> >> You can follow FIWARE at: >> website: http://www.fiware.org >> twitter: @FIWARE >> facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 >> linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, >> puede contener informaci?n privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso >> exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el >> destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilizaci?n, >> divulgaci?n y/o copia sin autorizaci?n puede estar prohibida en virtud de >> la legislaci?n vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos >> que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma v?a y proceda a su >> destrucci?n. >> >> The information contained in this transmission is privileged and >> confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or >> entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended >> recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or >> copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received >> this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the >> sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete >> it. >> >> Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu >> destinat?rio, pode conter informa??o privilegiada ou confidencial e ? para >> uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se n?o ? vossa senhoria o >> destinat?rio indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utiliza??o, >> divulga??o e/ou c?pia sem autoriza??o pode estar proibida em virtude da >> legisla??o vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos >> o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destrui??o >> > > > > -- > Stefano De Panfilis > Chief Innovation Officer > Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. > via Riccardo Morandi 32 > 00148 Roma > Italy > > tel (direct): +39-06-8759-4253 > tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 > fax: +39-068307-4200 > cell: +39-335-7542-567 > skype: depa01 > twitter: @depa01 > > > > ------------------------------ > > Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, > puede contener informaci?n privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso > exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el > destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilizaci?n, > divulgaci?n y/o copia sin autorizaci?n puede estar prohibida en virtud de > la legislaci?n vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos > que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma v?a y proceda a su > destrucci?n. > > The information contained in this transmission is privileged and > confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or > entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended > recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or > copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received > this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the > sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete > it. > > Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinat?rio, > pode conter informa??o privilegiada ou confidencial e ? para uso exclusivo > da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se n?o ? vossa senhoria o destinat?rio > indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utiliza??o, divulga??o e/ou > c?pia sem autoriza??o pode estar proibida em virtude da legisla??o vigente. > Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique > imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destrui??o > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com Fri Jul 24 11:38:20 2015 From: juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 11:38:20 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] FRANK: IMPORTANT FINAL CHECK BY FIWARE COACHES of questionnaire and evaluation dashboard to be used for FIWARE usage assessment In-Reply-To: <2671849c05d842fcb581ab53f8ec93dd@winhexbeeu17.win.mail> References: <55A6246C.9090302@telefonica.com> <55A62A1C.50205@telefonica.com> <620dec9f26e54a9489f59140fa794ba8@winhexbeeu17.win.mail> <55A726BB.3050300@telefonica.com> <55AFD321.3000405@telefonica.com> <2671849c05d842fcb581ab53f8ec93dd@winhexbeeu17.win.mail> Message-ID: <55B2078C.7040507@telefonica.com> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From francisco.romerobueno at telefonica.com Fri Jul 24 13:24:26 2015 From: francisco.romerobueno at telefonica.com (FRANCISCO ROMERO BUENO) Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 11:24:26 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] Accelerator question regarding support for Cosmos GE In-Reply-To: References: <19571_1437487364_55AE5104_19571_2760_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925CCCD16E@OPEXCLILM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <55AF97FF.3060107@telefonica.com> <55AF997D.2060707@telefonica.com> <55AFE95F.2090609@telefonica.com> Message-ID: Hi all, The new Installation and Configuration Guide will be ready on Monday SOB. The new User and Programmers Guide will be ready most likely on Monday as well; I think we can ?release? it with some minor sections in a ?to be done? status, nevertheless the definitive version won?t be ready until Tuesday or Wednesday. Regards, Francisco De: "stefano.depanfilis at eng.it" > Fecha: jueves, 23 de julio de 2015, 9:48 Para: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA > CC: Ilknur Chulani >, Francisco Romero Bueno >, SERGIO GARCIA GOMEZ >, "fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org" >, "thierry.nagellen at orange.com" > Asunto: Re: [Fiware-coaches] Accelerator question regarding support for Cosmos GE Great! Ciao Stefano Il 22/Lug/2015 21:05, "Juanjo Hierro" > ha scritto: Yes, you are right. We are working hard to get the information updated on the wiki and catalogue. It should be ready in the coming days. Best regards, -- Juanjo ______________________________________________________ Coordinator and Chief Architect, FIWARE platform CTO Industrial IoT, Telef?nica email: juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com twitter: @JuanjoHierro You can follow FIWARE at: website: http://www.fiware.org twitter: @FIWARE facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 22/07/15 17:27, stefano de panfilis wrote: dear juanjo, these are great news which for me are clarifing very well the situation :-) however, please bear in mind that the documentation in the catalogue is not up-to-date and that several smes are wishing to install it (wrong or correct this does not matter too much) and following the current installation guidelines the installation does not work as reported in several emails from smes. ciao, stefano 2015-07-22 15:24 GMT+02:00 Juanjo Hierro >: Hi, (Please replace my previous mail with this one, more complete (I accidentally click on send too early :-) We don't understand how this message about Telef?nica discontinuing support of Cosmos has been disseminated. Let me clarify: * Cosmos continues being the product that Telef?nica supports as implementation of the Big Data enabler. In fact, last months Telef?nica released a number of components/tools that are helping growth of the ?Cosmos ecosystem?, targeted to reinforce integration with other relevant FIWARE GEs: * Cygnus, for historical context data persistence. * Tidoop-ext, allowing using CKAN open data as input data for Hadoop. * Tidoop-mr, a library of general purpose MapReduce jobs ready to be used. * Even, we have moved to an OAuth2-based authentication and authorization for those REST APIs exposed in Hadoop. * Cosmos, as a live product, continuously evolves and this means changes. Sustainability of the whole product is one of the key aspects in mind when taking decisions about his evolution. In this respect, one of the changes we have introduced in Cosmos is about adopting Openstack?s Sahara as the core of the "Hadoop as a Service" engine of the Cosmos GE, replacing a development that Telef?nica had made supporting that functionality when nothing like Sahara was available. Reasons for this change are several, but the most important ones are: * Sahara natively integrates with Openstack, the virtualization infrastructure used in FIWARE, therefore the "Hadoop as a Service" engine would be much better integrated with OpenStack-based clouds like the FIWARE Lab. Based on DevStack, we will be also available to support this "Hadoop as a Service" functionality standalone (without requiring to deploy and setup a complete Cloud) on a number of dedicated servers. * Sahara offers at least the same functionality offered by the initial software to support "Hadoop as a Service" functionality developed by Telef?nica. That part of the product was fine when no technologies like Sahara were available. Now, it has no sense to continue with it, and it is more interesting for us (and the community of developers) to contribute to Sahara, reinforcing sustainability in the longer term.. * Anyways, our experience says most SME and startups just need Hadoop for performing data analysis. Deploying the "Hadoop as Service" functionality is only required by a few of them. For those who do not require to deploy that service, even installing Sahara has no sense since that would be as killing flies with cannons. As part of our support, Telef?nica is recommending these SMEs/startups who don't require a "Hadoop as a Service" functionality to go for any of the following two options: * To use the shared Hadoop cluster available at FIWARE Lab. This global instance has no 24x7 support nor production-like SLAs as it happens with the rest of the FIWARE Lab service. However, Telef?nica's team is committed to provide its best to support in time, whenever issues are reported. We believe that the performance for this support is good. * If the above is not enough and you are looking for a production environment, then you will need to install Hadoop in your own infrastructure by using any of the available distributions. In this case, Telef?nica is ready to support users on installing Hadoop as well. * Replacing the "Hadoop as a Service" engine doesn't affect at all how applications performing map-reduce bigdata analysis is performed with Cosmos. After all, in the new like the previous version, developers use the Hadoop APIs (they may also rely on the rest of additional APIs/tools we are creating as part of Cosmos, check the first bullet, but none of them has been discontinued). * For those few SME and startups willing to became a service provider and aiming offering Hadoop As A Service, the new Cosmos "Hadoop as a Service" engine based on Sahara is the right solution. * The same infrastructure you envisioned for previous versions of Cosmos is still valid for Sahara. * Regarding the installation, there are several distributions available making the task relatively easy. * We can support SMEs/startups on installing the new version of Cosmos relying on Sahara as the Hadoop as a Service engine. Bottom line and, as you can see, Cosmos continues being supported. Best regards, -- Juanjo Hierro ______________________________________________________ Coordinator and Chief Architect, FIWARE platform CTO Industrial IoT, Telef?nica email: juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com twitter: @JuanjoHierro You can follow FIWARE at: website: http://www.fiware.org twitter: @FIWARE facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, puede contener informaci?n privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilizaci?n, divulgaci?n y/o copia sin autorizaci?n puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislaci?n vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma v?a y proceda a su destrucci?n. The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete it. Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinat?rio, pode conter informa??o privilegiada ou confidencial e ? para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se n?o ? vossa senhoria o destinat?rio indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utiliza??o, divulga??o e/ou c?pia sem autoriza??o pode estar proibida em virtude da legisla??o vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destrui??o -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-06-8759-4253 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 skype: depa01 twitter: @depa01 ________________________________ Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, puede contener informaci?n privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilizaci?n, divulgaci?n y/o copia sin autorizaci?n puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislaci?n vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma v?a y proceda a su destrucci?n. The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete it. Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinat?rio, pode conter informa??o privilegiada ou confidencial e ? para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se n?o ? vossa senhoria o destinat?rio indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utiliza??o, divulga??o e/ou c?pia sem autoriza??o pode estar proibida em virtude da legisla??o vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destrui??o ________________________________ Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, puede contener informaci?n privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilizaci?n, divulgaci?n y/o copia sin autorizaci?n puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislaci?n vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma v?a y proceda a su destrucci?n. The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete it. Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinat?rio, pode conter informa??o privilegiada ou confidencial e ? para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se n?o ? vossa senhoria o destinat?rio indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utiliza??o, divulga??o e/ou c?pia sem autoriza??o pode estar proibida em virtude da legisla??o vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destrui??o -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From franck.le-gall at eglobalmark.com Fri Jul 24 22:48:54 2015 From: franck.le-gall at eglobalmark.com (Franck Le Gall) Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 20:48:54 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] FRANK: IMPORTANT FINAL CHECK BY FIWARE COACHES of questionnaire and evaluation dashboard to be used for FIWARE usage assessment In-Reply-To: <55B2078C.7040507@telefonica.com> References: <55A6246C.9090302@telefonica.com> <55A62A1C.50205@telefonica.com> <620dec9f26e54a9489f59140fa794ba8@winhexbeeu17.win.mail> <55A726BB.3050300@telefonica.com> <55AFD321.3000405@telefonica.com> <2671849c05d842fcb581ab53f8ec93dd@winhexbeeu17.win.mail> <55B2078C.7040507@telefonica.com> Message-ID: <655a75c02d0844ed8dd7f57b15fca826@winhexbeeu17.win.mail> Hi I will set it up on te LAMP server provided by Telefonica. I will finish install on Monday as its my office IP address which is registered in your firewall to access the server. However, I will develop the survey on another instance and deploy it on the server when ready. To move forward, I will also need: * From coach willing to get their SMEs being managed in the overall pool: please fill the attached Excel file and send it back to me * A volunteer to write the template of the e.mail that will be sent to SMEs; inviting them to fill the survey Kind regards Franck De : Juanjo Hierro [mailto:juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com] Envoy? : vendredi 24 juillet 2015 11:38 ? : Franck Le Gall ; fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org Objet : Re: [Fiware-coaches] FRANK: IMPORTANT FINAL CHECK BY FIWARE COACHES of questionnaire and evaluation dashboard to be used for FIWARE usage assessment Hi Franck, Have you configure the final version of the questionnaire with the latest comments in consideration? I have checked http://survey-fiware.eglobalmark.com/ but it looks like it is not yet ready. Will you finally setup the questionnaire in the dedicated LAMP server at survey.fiware.org deployed by Jos? Ignacio? I believe this only was awaiting for you to provide the IP addresses from which you will need to get root ssh access. This way, Jos? Ignacio can configure the firewall. Cheers, -- Juanjo ______________________________________________________ Coordinator and Chief Architect, FIWARE platform CTO Industrial IoT, Telef?nica email: juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com twitter: @JuanjoHierro You can follow FIWARE at: website: http://www.fiware.org twitter: @FIWARE facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 22/07/15 23:19, Franck Le Gall wrote: Hello -> Answers can be downloaded as an excel file .See attached the file generated with some dummy answers. It can be copy/pasted to a google sheet afterward -> The scoreboard calculation could probably be made from the survey. I cannot not test it right now but will do it within few days. -> OK to add only the yes/planned/no questions only and run it from our server (as an alternative, if you tell me who is managing the fiware.org domain name at Telefonica, I can work with then to get a subdomain survey.fiware.org pointing toward our servers). However, we should not expect to receive many additional files from the company as people are in general reluctant to make efforts for the surveys. -> Regarding the ?planned? definition, here are the statements which were proposed from our FISTAR survey in relation with enablers selection ? I looked at this Enabler ? I considered the Enabler to be relevant for my application ? I integrated the Enabler into my application ? I released a version of my application that used the Enabler ? I want to sustain the use of the Enabler ? Not considered We could adapt this list in our case. As an example, the choices for the first question would be: Are you using the FIWARE Lab cloud hosting capabilities (VMs, Object Storage, Blueprints)? ? I use FIWARE Lab cloud hosting capabilities to run my application ? I considered using FIWARE Lab cloud hosting capabilities to run my application but do not currently use it ? I did not considered using FIWAREE lab cloud hosting capabilities Kind regards Franck De : Juanjo Hierro [mailto:juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com] Envoy? : mercredi 22 juillet 2015 19:30 ? : Franck Le Gall ; fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org Objet : Re: [Fiware-coaches] FRANK: IMPORTANT FINAL CHECK BY FIWARE COACHES of questionnaire and evaluation dashboard to be used for FIWARE usage assessment Hi, A couple of final questions regarding usage of the questionnaire tool ... Once the questionnaire is fulfilled by all the SMEs/startups ... * in which format is it going to be feasible to obtain the responses to the questionnaire provided by a given SME/entrepreneur? * Could we automate the process of filling the evaluation scorecard based on Google docs, using the info gathered through the questionnaire? Giving it a though, I believe that we may present a questionnaire where SMEs/entrepreneurs just provide the yes/planned/no answers to the questions using the questionnaire. They would be asked to attach, at the end of the questionnaire, a .docx where the rationale behind each positive response should be provided. Such document would be attached when the questionnaire is fulfilled. To make things simpler, I would suggest that for this first round (probably we will have to run an additional assessment beginning of next year) we use the questionnaire setup in the server at eglobalmark.com. Frank: could you get the questionnaire prepared? (there would not be fields for providing rationale but a .docx to be able to attach to the responses as explained earlier). As with regards with a more detailed description of "planned" I believe we should just specify a deadline for materialization of the intents. What about explaining "planned" as: "not yet implemented but already considered to be integrated as part of the architecture before end of 2015". Thoughts? Cheers, -- Juanjo ______________________________________________________ Coordinator and Chief Architect, FIWARE platform CTO Industrial IoT, Telef?nica email: juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com twitter: @JuanjoHierro You can follow FIWARE at: website: http://www.fiware.org twitter: @FIWARE facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 17/07/15 09:30, Franck Le Gall wrote: Hello, #1 -> I added a more advanced editor for the ?free text? questions -> I added a question at the end to allow the upload of files. Please have a look: http://survey.eglobalmark.com/index.php/survey/index/sid/825872/newtest/Y/lang/en #2 If we want simply to collect the yes/planned/no answers then presentation of the survey could be simplified by showing all aggregated in one table #3 Regarding collection of names and e.mail addresses, I assume each coach should be able to gather this easily. I personally have most names and contacts of companies I am following. #4 To deploy the tool, a SSH root access to a LAMP server should be OK. Potential issues are with the mailing as PHP scripts will need to be able to send e.mail. Also make sure that hosting is production level (not in FIWARE lab) to avoid drops in the service while survey is running. Franck De : Juanjo Hierro [mailto:juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com] Envoy? : jeudi 16 juillet 2015 05:36 ? : Franck Le Gall; fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org Objet : Re: [Fiware-coaches] FRANK: IMPORTANT FINAL CHECK BY FIWARE COACHES of questionnaire and evaluation dashboard to be used for FIWARE usage assessment On 15/07/15 19:20, Franck Le Gall wrote: Hello Some points: #1 I can for sure transfer the questionnaire to the on-line tool. I quickly transferred the 2 first set of questions here: http://survey.eglobalmark.com/index.php/survey/index/sid/825872/newtest/Y/lang/en It is currently available to anybody for test. Feedback welcome I like the idea about the survey tool ... however my concern is about the editing possibilities for fields dealing with explanations ... particularly in terms of adding some figures (pictures) that may be helpful for explaining the ideas or in terms of styles for paragraphs of the explanations. As an example, what if someone wishes to add a bullet list as part of their definition? Any thoughts about how these issues may be overcome? Would simply copy and paste of a figure, or a piece of text, work? I have tried but I didn't succeed. Does the tool allow to end the questionnaire adding some word file? I'm asking this because then one possibility could be to use the survey tool to gather just the info about the self-assessment (collection of yes/planned/no responses) instead of passing them a google docs spreadsheet template they have to download, complete and submit. I would go for using this questionnaire tool for gathering input about the self-assessment, provided that a document with the complete response can be attached. Please confirm this is feasible. #2 To move efficiently and track the respondents, I strongly suggest to use the mailing capabilities of the tool from which we could send personalized invitations as well as reminders to the one who did not answers => For that purpose, I would need the following table: Accelerator | SME name | Contact firstname | Contact lastname | Contact e.mail => If some coach prefer to manage their own instance of the survey this is doable Unfortunately, I'm afraid the info you request might be difficult to gather and some of the FIWARE accelerator projects seem like they don't want to share that info if they have it. What i can tell is that there is a mailing list (fiware-entrepreneurs at lists.fiware.org) where many of the entrepreneurs that are associated to some FIWARE Accelerator project are subscribed. It is true that the list also include additional entrepreneurs, not necessary associated to a FIWARE Accelerator project, who have expressed their interest to be informed about developments regarding FIWARE. I wonder whether that would help or we should create the requested table. If so, then we only have the chance to ask for such a table to Ogilvy who is intended to build it (indeed, we populated the fiware-entrepreneurs mailing list based on the table they had). #3 I suggest to put most of the questions as mandatory to be answered. OK ? I agree. Indeed I believe all the questions should be mandatory (with the exception of the question on SEs since there may be applications that may not use SEs at all). #4 Our survey tool currently run under our domain name (eglobalmark.com). If we want him to run under FIWARE, I would either need a LAMP hosting on FIWARE side or redirecting a FIWARE sub-domain DNS to our server. If we go for using the survey tool to gather the self-assessment by responders, then I can arrange the assignment of a LAMP server linked to the FIWARE website domain. If we provide a VM with a LAMP stack already deployed and configured, would that be enough? Cheers, -- Juanjo Kind regards Franck De : fiware-coaches-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [mailto:fiware-coaches-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] De la part de Juanjo Hierro Envoy? : mercredi 15 juillet 2015 11:39 ? : fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org Objet : [Fiware-coaches] FRANK: IMPORTANT FINAL CHECK BY FIWARE COACHES of questionnaire and evaluation dashboard to be used for FIWARE usage assessment Hi, A question to Frank ... are we going to finally create a questionnaire using some sort of tool like the one you mentioned in our last confcall or should we ask each SME/startup to make their own copy of the questionnaire, answer it and send it to the corresponding coach? I need an urgent answer to this so that I can take it into consideration for the message I would like to post on Basecamp. For the rest, don't forget to review my previous email (again attached for your convenience. Cheers, -- Juanjo On 15/07/15 11:14, Juanjo Hierro wrote: Dear all, I have carried out a final review of the questionnaire and the evaluation scorecard to be used for the assessment on the usage of FIWARE by SMEs/startups under the FIWARE Accelerator programme. I will post a message on basecamp announcing that we will launch the assessment process based on the proposed questionnaire and scorecard (which I have updated after this final review) tomorrow around 16:00 unless I hear any objections from you. Therefore, please, take your time to review it. I would appreciate if you also response to this email providing a confirmation that you have actually reviewed both tools and agree with the proposed changes. I have incorporated the following changes both in the questionnaire and scorecard: * I have setup a distinction between "planned" usage and "actual" usage (the app has already implemented the criteria). Therefore, the previous values where 0 (does NOT support either A or B), 1 (supports A) and 2 (supports B) translate into values 0 (does not plan to support either A or B), 1 (plans to support A), 2 (already implements A), 3 (plans to support B), 4 (already implements B). My initial idea was to consider scores 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2, but it happens that google docs lead to problems if you use numbers with decimals, so I went for having 0 to 4. * I have modified the meaning of values assigned as scores regarding context information management so that 3-4 points are given when integration with 3rd party systems as context information sources is considered. Previously, we were giving maximum points if historic context information was registered in Cosmos for further analysis. In line with this change, I have modified the scoring regarding usage of the Cosmos BigData GE so that the 1-2 points (previously 1 point) are given when historic context information data is registered in Cosmos for further analysis. * I have aligned the meaning of values assigned for scoring usage of Wirecloud to the other GEs (CEP, Kurento, etc), so that 1-2 points (previously 1 point) are given when the GE is used and 3-4 points (previously 2 points) are given when it is used managing context information. * I introduced several editorial comments on the questionnaire so that it becomes more readable and better aligned with the scorecard. I have created final versions of both the "Questionnaire for FIWARE Usage Assessment" and the "FIWARE Usage Assessment scorecard". I have also make sure both get aligned. The final version of the "Questionnaire for FIWARE Usage Assessment" will be here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BOv96zNeytDoPMecfFBuUDmisiLxlQKJUADIbtp8XKw/edit# The final version of the "FIWARE Usage Assessment scorecard" will be here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Dijrn2gUsU0-dPhVqE9RXKi6MKkLnBVn_3YUEQWvCSs/edit?usp=sharing Cheers, -- Juanjo ______________________________________________________ Coordinator and Chief Architect, FIWARE platform CTO Industrial IoT, Telef?nica email: juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com twitter: @JuanjoHierro You can follow FIWARE at: website: http://www.fiware.org twitter: @FIWARE facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, puede contener informaci?n privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilizaci?n, divulgaci?n y/o copia sin autorizaci?n puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislaci?n vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma v?a y proceda a su destrucci?n. The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete it. Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinat?rio, pode conter informa??o privilegiada ou confidencial e ? para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se n?o ? vossa senhoria o destinat?rio indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utiliza??o, divulga??o e/ou c?pia sem autoriza??o pode estar proibida em virtude da legisla??o vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destrui??o ________________________________ Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, puede contener informaci?n privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilizaci?n, divulgaci?n y/o copia sin autorizaci?n puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislaci?n vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma v?a y proceda a su destrucci?n. The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete it. Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinat?rio, pode conter informa??o privilegiada ou confidencial e ? para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se n?o ? vossa senhoria o destinat?rio indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utiliza??o, divulga??o e/ou c?pia sem autoriza??o pode estar proibida em virtude da legisla??o vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destrui??o ________________________________ Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, puede contener informaci?n privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilizaci?n, divulgaci?n y/o copia sin autorizaci?n puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislaci?n vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma v?a y proceda a su destrucci?n. The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete it. Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinat?rio, pode conter informa??o privilegiada ou confidencial e ? para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se n?o ? vossa senhoria o destinat?rio indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utiliza??o, divulga??o e/ou c?pia sem autoriza??o pode estar proibida em virtude da legisla??o vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destrui??o ________________________________ Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, puede contener informaci?n privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilizaci?n, divulgaci?n y/o copia sin autorizaci?n puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislaci?n vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma v?a y proceda a su destrucci?n. The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete it. Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinat?rio, pode conter informa??o privilegiada ou confidencial e ? para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se n?o ? vossa senhoria o destinat?rio indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utiliza??o, divulga??o e/ou c?pia sem autoriza??o pode estar proibida em virtude da legisla??o vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destrui??o -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: SMEs contacts.xlsx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet Size: 9137 bytes Desc: SMEs contacts.xlsx URL: From silvio.cretti at create-net.org Sat Jul 25 08:09:27 2015 From: silvio.cretti at create-net.org (Silvio Cretti) Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2015 08:09:27 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] FRANK: IMPORTANT FINAL CHECK BY FIWARE COACHES of questionnaire and evaluation dashboard to be used for FIWARE usage assessment In-Reply-To: <655a75c02d0844ed8dd7f57b15fca826@winhexbeeu17.win.mail> References: <55A6246C.9090302@telefonica.com> <55A62A1C.50205@telefonica.com> <620dec9f26e54a9489f59140fa794ba8@winhexbeeu17.win.mail> <55A726BB.3050300@telefonica.com> <55AFD321.3000405@telefonica.com> <2671849c05d842fcb581ab53f8ec93dd@winhexbeeu17.win.mail> <55B2078C.7040507@telefonica.com> <655a75c02d0844ed8dd7f57b15fca826@winhexbeeu17.win.mail> Message-ID: Hi Frank and Juanjo, in order to speed up things, I already asked to my accelerator (CreatiFI) the list of contacts of the SME (email address etc.), but the coordinator answered that she prefers to have a formal communication to the A16 about this survey (I guess through basecamp) before proceeding with this. So I suggest to do that asap. Thanks in advance and best regards, silvio On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 10:48 PM, Franck Le Gall < franck.le-gall at eglobalmark.com> wrote: > Hi > > > > I will set it up on te LAMP server provided by Telefonica. I will finish > install on Monday as its my office IP address which is registered in your > firewall to access the server. > > > > However, I will develop the survey on another instance and deploy it on > the server when ready. > > > > To move forward, I will also need: > > * From coach willing to get their SMEs being managed in the overall pool: > please fill the attached Excel file and send it back to me > > * A volunteer to write the template of the e.mail that will be sent to > SMEs; inviting them to fill the survey > > > > Kind regards > > Franck > > > > *De :* Juanjo Hierro [mailto:juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com] > *Envoy? :* vendredi 24 juillet 2015 11:38 > > *? :* Franck Le Gall ; > fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org > *Objet :* Re: [Fiware-coaches] FRANK: IMPORTANT FINAL CHECK BY FIWARE > COACHES of questionnaire and evaluation dashboard to be used for FIWARE > usage assessment > > > > Hi Franck, > > Have you configure the final version of the questionnaire with the > latest comments in consideration? I have checked > http://survey-fiware.eglobalmark.com/ but it looks like it is not yet > ready. > > Will you finally setup the questionnaire in the dedicated LAMP server at > survey.fiware.org deployed by Jos? Ignacio? I believe this only was > awaiting for you to provide the IP addresses from which you will need to > get root ssh access. This way, Jos? Ignacio can configure the firewall. > > Cheers, > > -- Juanjo > > > ______________________________________________________ > > > > Coordinator and Chief Architect, FIWARE platform > > CTO Industrial IoT, Telef?nica > > > > email: juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com > > twitter: @JuanjoHierro > > > > You can follow FIWARE at: > > website: http://www.fiware.org > > twitter: @FIWARE > > facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > > linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > On 22/07/15 23:19, Franck Le Gall wrote: > > Hello > > > > -> Answers can be downloaded as an excel file .See attached the file > generated with some dummy answers. It can be copy/pasted to a google sheet > afterward > > -> The scoreboard calculation could probably be made from the survey. I > cannot not test it right now but will do it within few days. > > > > -> OK to add only the yes/planned/no questions only and run it from our > server (as an alternative, if you tell me who is managing the fiware.org > domain name at Telefonica, I can work with then to get a subdomain > survey.fiware.org pointing toward our servers). > > However, we should not expect to receive many additional files from the > company as people are in general reluctant to make efforts for the surveys. > > > > -> Regarding the ?planned? definition, here are the statements which were > proposed from our FISTAR survey in relation with enablers selection > > ? *I looked at this Enabler* > > ? *I considered the Enabler to be relevant for my application* > > ? *I integrated the Enabler into my application* > > ? *I released a version of my application that used the Enabler* > > ? *I want to sustain the use of the Enabler* > > ? *Not considered* > > We could adapt this list in our case. As an example, the choices for the > first question would be: > > > > *Are you using the FIWARE Lab cloud hosting capabilities (VMs, Object > Storage, Blueprints)?* > > ? *I use FIWARE Lab cloud hosting capabilities to run my > application* > > ? *I considered using FIWARE Lab cloud hosting capabilities to > run my application but do not currently use it* > > ? *I did not considered using FIWAREE lab cloud hosting > capabilities* > > > > > > Kind regards > > Franck > > > > *De :* Juanjo Hierro [mailto:juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com > ] > *Envoy? :* mercredi 22 juillet 2015 19:30 > *? :* Franck Le Gall > ; fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org > *Objet :* Re: [Fiware-coaches] FRANK: IMPORTANT FINAL CHECK BY FIWARE > COACHES of questionnaire and evaluation dashboard to be used for FIWARE > usage assessment > > > > Hi, > > A couple of final questions regarding usage of the questionnaire tool > ... Once the questionnaire is fulfilled by all the SMEs/startups ... > > - in which format is it going to be feasible to obtain the responses > to the questionnaire provided by a given SME/entrepreneur? > - Could we automate the process of filling the evaluation scorecard > based on Google docs, using the info gathered through the questionnaire? > > > Giving it a though, I believe that we may present a questionnaire where > SMEs/entrepreneurs just provide the yes/planned/no answers to the questions > using the questionnaire. They would be asked to attach, at the end of the > questionnaire, a .docx where the rationale behind each positive response > should be provided. Such document would be attached when the > questionnaire is fulfilled. > > To make things simpler, I would suggest that for this first round > (probably we will have to run an additional assessment beginning of next > year) we use the questionnaire setup in the server at eglobalmark.com. > Frank: could you get the questionnaire prepared? (there would not be > fields for providing rationale but a .docx to be able to attach to the > responses as explained earlier). > > As with regards with a more detailed description of "planned" I believe > we should just specify a deadline for materialization of the intents. > What about explaining "planned" as: "not yet implemented but already > considered to be integrated as part of the architecture before end of > 2015". Thoughts? > > Cheers, > > -- Juanjo > > > > ______________________________________________________ > > > > Coordinator and Chief Architect, FIWARE platform > > CTO Industrial IoT, Telef?nica > > > > email: juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com > > twitter: @JuanjoHierro > > > > You can follow FIWARE at: > > website: http://www.fiware.org > > twitter: @FIWARE > > facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > > linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > On 17/07/15 09:30, Franck Le Gall wrote: > > Hello, > > > > #1 > > -> I added a more advanced editor for the ?free text? questions > > -> I added a question at the end to allow the upload of files. > > Please have a look: > http://survey.eglobalmark.com/index.php/survey/index/sid/825872/newtest/Y/lang/en > > > > #2 > > If we want simply to collect the yes/planned/no answers then presentation > of the survey could be simplified by showing all aggregated in one table > > > > #3 > > Regarding collection of names and e.mail addresses, I assume each coach > should be able to gather this easily. I personally have most names and > contacts of companies I am following. > > > > #4 > > To deploy the tool, a SSH root access to a LAMP server should be OK. > Potential issues are with the mailing as PHP scripts will need to be able > to send e.mail. > > Also make sure that hosting is production level (not in FIWARE lab) to > avoid drops in the service while survey is running. > > > > Franck > > > > > > > > > > *De :* Juanjo Hierro [mailto:juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com > ] > *Envoy? :* jeudi 16 juillet 2015 05:36 > *? :* Franck Le Gall; fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org > *Objet :* Re: [Fiware-coaches] FRANK: IMPORTANT FINAL CHECK BY FIWARE > COACHES of questionnaire and evaluation dashboard to be used for FIWARE > usage assessment > > > > > > On 15/07/15 19:20, Franck Le Gall wrote: > > Hello > > > > Some points: > > > > #1 I can for sure transfer the questionnaire to the on-line tool. I > quickly transferred the 2 first set of questions here: > http://survey.eglobalmark.com/index.php/survey/index/sid/825872/newtest/Y/lang/en > > It is currently available to anybody for test. > > > > Feedback welcome > > > I like the idea about the survey tool ... however my concern is about > the editing possibilities for fields dealing with explanations ... > particularly in terms of adding some figures (pictures) that may be helpful > for explaining the ideas or in terms of styles for paragraphs of the > explanations. As an example, what if someone wishes to add a bullet list > as part of their definition? > > Any thoughts about how these issues may be overcome? Would simply copy > and paste of a figure, or a piece of text, work? I have tried but I > didn't succeed. > > Does the tool allow to end the questionnaire adding some word file? > I'm asking this because then one possibility could be to use the survey > tool to gather just the info about the self-assessment (collection of > yes/planned/no responses) instead of passing them a google docs spreadsheet > template they have to download, complete and submit. > > I would go for using this questionnaire tool for gathering input about > the self-assessment, provided that a document with the complete response > can be attached. Please confirm this is feasible. > > > > > > > #2 To move efficiently and track the respondents, I strongly suggest to > use the mailing capabilities of the tool from which we could send > personalized invitations as well as reminders to the one who did not answers > > > > => For that purpose, I would need the following table: Accelerator | SME > name | Contact firstname | Contact lastname | Contact e.mail > > => If some coach prefer to manage their own instance of the survey this is > doable > > > Unfortunately, I'm afraid the info you request might be difficult to > gather and some of the FIWARE accelerator projects seem like they don't > want to share that info if they have it. What i can tell is that there is > a mailing list (fiware-entrepreneurs at lists.fiware.org) where many of the > entrepreneurs that are associated to some FIWARE Accelerator project are > subscribed. It is true that the list also include additional > entrepreneurs, not necessary associated to a FIWARE Accelerator project, > who have expressed their interest to be informed about developments > regarding FIWARE. > > I wonder whether that would help or we should create the requested > table. If so, then we only have the chance to ask for such a table to > Ogilvy who is intended to build it (indeed, we populated the > fiware-entrepreneurs mailing list based on the table they had). > > > > > > #3 I suggest to put most of the questions as mandatory to be answered. OK ? > > > I agree. Indeed I believe all the questions should be mandatory (with > the exception of the question on SEs since there may be applications that > may not use SEs at all). > > > > > > > #4 Our survey tool currently run under our domain name (eglobalmark.com). > If we want him to run under FIWARE, I would either need a LAMP hosting on > FIWARE side or redirecting a FIWARE sub-domain DNS to our server. > > > If we go for using the survey tool to gather the self-assessment by > responders, then I can arrange the assignment of a LAMP server linked to > the FIWARE website domain. If we provide a VM with a LAMP stack already > deployed and configured, would that be enough? > > Cheers, > > -- Juanjo > > > > > > > > > Kind regards > > Franck > > > > > > > > > > *De :* fiware-coaches-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [ > mailto:fiware-coaches-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org > ] *De la part de* Juanjo Hierro > *Envoy? :* mercredi 15 juillet 2015 11:39 > *? :* fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org > *Objet :* [Fiware-coaches] FRANK: IMPORTANT FINAL CHECK BY FIWARE COACHES > of questionnaire and evaluation dashboard to be used for FIWARE usage > assessment > > > > Hi, > > A question to Frank ... are we going to finally create a questionnaire > using some sort of tool like the one you mentioned in our last confcall or > should we ask each SME/startup to make their own copy of the questionnaire, > answer it and send it to the corresponding coach? > > I need an urgent answer to this so that I can take it into consideration > for the message I would like to post on Basecamp. > > For the rest, don't forget to review my previous email (again attached > for your convenience. > > Cheers, > > -- Juanjo > > > > > > > On 15/07/15 11:14, Juanjo Hierro wrote: > > Dear all, > > I have carried out a final review of the questionnaire and the > evaluation scorecard to be used for the assessment on the usage of FIWARE > by SMEs/startups under the FIWARE Accelerator programme. > > I will post a message on basecamp announcing that we will launch the > assessment process based on the proposed questionnaire and scorecard (which > I have updated after this final review) tomorrow around 16:00 unless I hear > any objections from you. Therefore, please, take your time to review > it. I would appreciate if you also response to this email providing a > confirmation that you have actually reviewed both tools and agree with the > proposed changes. > > I have incorporated the following changes both in the questionnaire and > scorecard: > > - I have setup a distinction between "planned" usage and "actual" > usage (the app has already implemented the criteria). Therefore, the > previous values where 0 (does NOT support either A or B), 1 (supports A) > and 2 (supports B) translate into values 0 (does not plan to support either > A or B), 1 (plans to support A), 2 (already implements A), 3 (plans to > support B), 4 (already implements B). My initial idea was to consider > scores 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2, but it happens that google docs lead to > problems if you use numbers with decimals, so I went for having 0 to 4. > - I have modified the meaning of values assigned as scores regarding > context information management so that 3-4 points are given when > integration with 3rd party systems as context information sources is > considered. Previously, we were giving maximum points if historic context > information was registered in Cosmos for further analysis. In line with > this change, I have modified the scoring regarding usage of the Cosmos > BigData GE so that the 1-2 points (previously 1 point) are given when > historic context information data is registered in Cosmos for further > analysis. > - I have aligned the meaning of values assigned for scoring usage of > Wirecloud to the other GEs (CEP, Kurento, etc), so that 1-2 points > (previously 1 point) are given when the GE is used and 3-4 points > (previously 2 points) are given when it is used managing context > information. > - I introduced several editorial comments on the questionnaire so that > it becomes more readable and better aligned with the scorecard. > > > I have created final versions of both the "Questionnaire for FIWARE > Usage Assessment" and the "FIWARE Usage Assessment scorecard". I have > also make sure both get aligned. > > The final version of the "Questionnaire for FIWARE Usage Assessment" > will be here: > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BOv96zNeytDoPMecfFBuUDmisiLxlQKJUADIbtp8XKw/edit# > > > > The final version of the "FIWARE Usage Assessment scorecard" will be > here: > > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Dijrn2gUsU0-dPhVqE9RXKi6MKkLnBVn_3YUEQWvCSs/edit?usp=sharing > > > Cheers, > > > > > -- Juanjo > > > > ______________________________________________________ > > > > Coordinator and Chief Architect, FIWARE platform > > CTO Industrial IoT, Telef?nica > > > > email: juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com > > twitter: @JuanjoHierro > > > > You can follow FIWARE at: > > website: http://www.fiware.org > > twitter: @FIWARE > > facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > > linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > > ------------------------------ > > > Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, > puede contener informaci?n privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso > exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el > destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilizaci?n, > divulgaci?n y/o copia sin autorizaci?n puede estar prohibida en virtud de > la legislaci?n vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos > que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma v?a y proceda a su > destrucci?n. > > The information contained in this transmission is privileged and > confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or > entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended > recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or > copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received > this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the > sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete > it. > > Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinat?rio, > pode conter informa??o privilegiada ou confidencial e ? para uso exclusivo > da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se n?o ? vossa senhoria o destinat?rio > indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utiliza??o, divulga??o e/ou > c?pia sem autoriza??o pode estar proibida em virtude da legisla??o vigente. > Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique > imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destrui??o > > > ------------------------------ > > > Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, > puede contener informaci?n privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso > exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el > destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilizaci?n, > divulgaci?n y/o copia sin autorizaci?n puede estar prohibida en virtud de > la legislaci?n vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos > que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma v?a y proceda a su > destrucci?n. > > The information contained in this transmission is privileged and > confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or > entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended > recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or > copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received > this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the > sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete > it. > > Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinat?rio, > pode conter informa??o privilegiada ou confidencial e ? para uso exclusivo > da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se n?o ? vossa senhoria o destinat?rio > indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utiliza??o, divulga??o e/ou > c?pia sem autoriza??o pode estar proibida em virtude da legisla??o vigente. > Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique > imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destrui??o > > > ------------------------------ > > > Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, > puede contener informaci?n privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso > exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el > destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilizaci?n, > divulgaci?n y/o copia sin autorizaci?n puede estar prohibida en virtud de > la legislaci?n vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos > que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma v?a y proceda a su > destrucci?n. > > The information contained in this transmission is privileged and > confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or > entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended > recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or > copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received > this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the > sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete > it. > > Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinat?rio, > pode conter informa??o privilegiada ou confidencial e ? para uso exclusivo > da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se n?o ? vossa senhoria o destinat?rio > indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utiliza??o, divulga??o e/ou > c?pia sem autoriza??o pode estar proibida em virtude da legisla??o vigente. > Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique > imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destrui??o > > > ------------------------------ > > > Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, > puede contener informaci?n privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso > exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el > destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilizaci?n, > divulgaci?n y/o copia sin autorizaci?n puede estar prohibida en virtud de > la legislaci?n vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos > que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma v?a y proceda a su > destrucci?n. > > The information contained in this transmission is privileged and > confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or > entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended > recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or > copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received > this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the > sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete > it. > > Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinat?rio, > pode conter informa??o privilegiada ou confidencial e ? para uso exclusivo > da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se n?o ? vossa senhoria o destinat?rio > indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utiliza??o, divulga??o e/ou > c?pia sem autoriza??o pode estar proibida em virtude da legisla??o vigente. > Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique > imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destrui??o > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-coaches mailing list > Fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org > https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-coaches > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com Sat Jul 25 13:53:16 2015 From: juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2015 13:53:16 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] FRANK: IMPORTANT FINAL CHECK BY FIWARE COACHES of questionnaire and evaluation dashboard to be used for FIWARE usage assessment In-Reply-To: References: <55A6246C.9090302@telefonica.com> <55A62A1C.50205@telefonica.com> <620dec9f26e54a9489f59140fa794ba8@winhexbeeu17.win.mail> <55A726BB.3050300@telefonica.com> <55AFD321.3000405@telefonica.com> <2671849c05d842fcb581ab53f8ec93dd@winhexbeeu17.win.mail> <55B2078C.7040507@telefonica.com> <655a75c02d0844ed8dd7f57b15fca826@winhexbeeu17.win.mail> Message-ID: <55B378AC.3020906@telefonica.com> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From franck.le-gall at eglobalmark.com Mon Jul 27 11:30:50 2015 From: franck.le-gall at eglobalmark.com (Franck Le Gall) Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 09:30:50 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] Survey FIWARE usage Message-ID: <255aee626a614287826e5ddd82fefdaf@winhexbeeu17.win.mail> Dear all, We still miss coaches contributions to define the specific enablers in columns R to V of the questionnaire (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Dijrn2gUsU0-dPhVqE9RXKi6MKkLnBVn_3YUEQWvCSs/edit#gid=0) Usage of SEs from FI-Content2: Thierry Usage of SEs from FITMAN: Engineering? Usage of SEs from FINESCE: Pasquale Additional question: could someone clarify me how is the overall score computed, taking into account possible use of SEs ? Thank you Franck -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From leandro.guillen at imdea.org Mon Jul 27 11:54:06 2015 From: leandro.guillen at imdea.org (Leandro Guillen) Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 11:54:06 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] Survey FIWARE usage In-Reply-To: <255aee626a614287826e5ddd82fefdaf@winhexbeeu17.win.mail> References: <255aee626a614287826e5ddd82fefdaf@winhexbeeu17.win.mail> Message-ID: <55B5FFBE.6090102@imdea.org> Hi Franck, The total score is computated adding up all the column scores, wich are in turn just the individual score times the assigned weight. So for each SE use cases it would be SCORE*2, where SCORE=[0-4]. I hope it makes sense. Regards, Leandro El 27/07/15 a las 11:30, Franck Le Gall escribi?: > > Dear all, > > We still miss coaches contributions to define the specific enablers in > columns R to V of the questionnaire > (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Dijrn2gUsU0-dPhVqE9RXKi6MKkLnBVn_3YUEQWvCSs/edit#gid=0) > > > *Usage of SEs from > FI-Content2: Thierry* > > > > *Usage of SEs from > FITMAN: Engineering?* > > > > *Usage of SEs from > FINESCE: Pasquale* > > Additional question: could someone clarify me how is the overall score > computed, taking into account possible use of SEs ? > > Thank you > > Franck > > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-coaches mailing list > Fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org > https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-coaches -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From franck.le-gall at eglobalmark.com Mon Jul 27 11:56:09 2015 From: franck.le-gall at eglobalmark.com (Franck Le Gall) Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 09:56:09 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] Survey FIWARE -> Missing questions ? Message-ID: <475b5512e99248b7803c37ea6f46a51f@winhexbeeu17.win.mail> In the questionnaire I do not see any question related to "Degree of Integration" (visible here in column F) of the scoring table Is this intended ? I assume not If confirmed, I will create corresponding questions -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From franck.le-gall at eglobalmark.com Mon Jul 27 12:27:41 2015 From: franck.le-gall at eglobalmark.com (Franck Le Gall) Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 10:27:41 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] Survey FIWARE usage In-Reply-To: <55B5FFBE.6090102@imdea.org> References: <255aee626a614287826e5ddd82fefdaf@winhexbeeu17.win.mail> <55B5FFBE.6090102@imdea.org> Message-ID: OK. Thank you. I thought use case projects would be grouped in a way or the other but OK to go this way De : Leandro Guillen [mailto:leandro.guillen at imdea.org] Envoy? : lundi 27 juillet 2015 11:54 ? : Franck Le Gall ; Juanjo Hierro ; fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org Objet : Re: [Fiware-coaches] Survey FIWARE usage Hi Franck, The total score is computated adding up all the column scores, wich are in turn just the individual score times the assigned weight. So for each SE use cases it would be SCORE*2, where SCORE=[0-4]. I hope it makes sense. Regards, Leandro El 27/07/15 a las 11:30, Franck Le Gall escribi?: Dear all, We still miss coaches contributions to define the specific enablers in columns R to V of the questionnaire (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Dijrn2gUsU0-dPhVqE9RXKi6MKkLnBVn_3YUEQWvCSs/edit#gid=0) Usage of SEs from FI-Content2: Thierry Usage of SEs from FITMAN: Engineering? Usage of SEs from FINESCE: Pasquale Additional question: could someone clarify me how is the overall score computed, taking into account possible use of SEs ? Thank you Franck _______________________________________________ Fiware-coaches mailing list Fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-coaches -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Mon Jul 27 15:57:09 2015 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 15:57:09 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] Fwd: Survey FIWARE usage In-Reply-To: <255aee626a614287826e5ddd82fefdaf@winhexbeeu17.win.mail> References: <255aee626a614287826e5ddd82fefdaf@winhexbeeu17.win.mail> Message-ID: dear mauro and pasquale, can you please urgently add the se from fitman and finesce in the shared google doc? thank you in advance! ciao, stefano ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Franck Le Gall Date: 2015-07-27 11:30 GMT+02:00 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] Survey FIWARE usage To: Juanjo Hierro , Dear all, We still miss coaches contributions to define the specific enablers in columns R to V of the questionnaire ( https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Dijrn2gUsU0-dPhVqE9RXKi6MKkLnBVn_3YUEQWvCSs/edit#gid=0) *Usage of SEs from FI-Content2: Thierry* *Usage of SEs from FITMAN: Engineering?* *Usage of SEs from FINESCE: Pasquale* Additional question: could someone clarify me how is the overall score computed, taking into account possible use of SEs ? Thank you Franck _______________________________________________ Fiware-coaches mailing list Fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-coaches -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-06-8759-4253 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 skype: depa01 twitter: @depa01 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pasquale.andriani at eng.it Mon Jul 27 16:53:40 2015 From: pasquale.andriani at eng.it (Pasquale Andriani) Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 16:53:40 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] Survey FIWARE usage In-Reply-To: References: <255aee626a614287826e5ddd82fefdaf@winhexbeeu17.win.mail> Message-ID: Done for FINESCE. Sorry for being late, regards, P. Pasquale Andriani Direzione Ricerca e Innovazione - Research & Development Lab pasquale.andriani at eng.it Engineering Ingegneria Informatica spa Via Riccardo Morandi, 32 - 00148 Roma Tel. +39-06.87594138 Mob. +39 3924698746 Fax. +39-06.83074408 www.eng.it On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 3:57 PM, stefano de panfilis < stefano.depanfilis at eng.it> wrote: > dear mauro and pasquale, > > can you please urgently add the se from fitman and finesce in the shared > google doc? > > thank you in advance! > > ciao, > stefano > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Franck Le Gall > Date: 2015-07-27 11:30 GMT+02:00 > Subject: [Fiware-coaches] Survey FIWARE usage > To: Juanjo Hierro , > > Dear all, > > > > We still miss coaches contributions to define the specific enablers in > columns R to V of the questionnaire ( > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Dijrn2gUsU0-dPhVqE9RXKi6MKkLnBVn_3YUEQWvCSs/edit#gid=0) > > > > > > *Usage of SEs from FI-Content2: Thierry* > > > *Usage of SEs from FITMAN: Engineering?* > > > *Usage of SEs from FINESCE: Pasquale* > > > > > > Additional question: could someone clarify me how is the overall score > computed, taking into account possible use of SEs ? > > > > Thank you > > Franck > > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-coaches mailing list > Fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org > https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-coaches > > > > > -- > Stefano De Panfilis > Chief Innovation Officer > Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. > via Riccardo Morandi 32 > 00148 Roma > Italy > > tel (direct): +39-06-8759-4253 > tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 > fax: +39-068307-4200 > cell: +39-335-7542-567 > skype: depa01 > twitter: @depa01 > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Mon Jul 27 18:10:56 2015 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 18:10:56 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] Survey FIWARE usage In-Reply-To: References: <255aee626a614287826e5ddd82fefdaf@winhexbeeu17.win.mail> Message-ID: Great, Many thanks mauro! Ciao Stefano Il 27/Lug/2015 16:23, "Mauro Isaja" ha scritto: > Done! > > BR > Mauro > > > Mauro Isaja > Engineering's Software Laboratory > mauro.isaja at eng.it > > Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. > Via Ferrini - Localit? San Martino - 53035 Monteriggioni (SI) > Tel. +39-0577.1887100 > Mob. +39-348.7866781 > Skype mauro.isaja > www.eng.it > > On 27 July 2015 at 15:57, stefano de panfilis > wrote: > >> dear mauro and pasquale, >> >> can you please urgently add the se from fitman and finesce in the shared >> google doc? >> >> thank you in advance! >> >> ciao, >> stefano >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Franck Le Gall >> Date: 2015-07-27 11:30 GMT+02:00 >> Subject: [Fiware-coaches] Survey FIWARE usage >> To: Juanjo Hierro , >> >> Dear all, >> >> >> >> We still miss coaches contributions to define the specific enablers in >> columns R to V of the questionnaire ( >> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Dijrn2gUsU0-dPhVqE9RXKi6MKkLnBVn_3YUEQWvCSs/edit#gid=0) >> >> >> >> >> >> *Usage of SEs from FI-Content2: Thierry* >> >> >> *Usage of SEs from FITMAN: Engineering?* >> >> >> *Usage of SEs from FINESCE: Pasquale* >> >> >> >> >> >> Additional question: could someone clarify me how is the overall score >> computed, taking into account possible use of SEs ? >> >> >> >> Thank you >> >> Franck >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Fiware-coaches mailing list >> Fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org >> https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-coaches >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Stefano De Panfilis >> Chief Innovation Officer >> Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. >> via Riccardo Morandi 32 >> 00148 Roma >> Italy >> >> tel (direct): +39-06-8759-4253 >> tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 >> fax: +39-068307-4200 >> cell: +39-335-7542-567 >> skype: depa01 >> twitter: @depa01 >> >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From franck.le-gall at eglobalmark.com Mon Jul 27 23:29:03 2015 From: franck.le-gall at eglobalmark.com (Franck Le Gall) Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 21:29:03 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] Assessment survey Message-ID: <78e2a331fbe74d0a88dac39f560b06d9@winhexbeeu17.win.mail> Dear all, The survey has been uploaded to the tool. All questions are now in and scoring is in place. Also, I added a 'comment' box beside each yes/planned/no question so people can add any info they would like (I am not convinced that the MSWord file will collect many contributions as more or less doubling the burdening) The e.mailing configuration still need to be done and I am with the Telefonica's IT on that. However, you can already give a test to the survey by going here: http://survey.fiware.org/index.php/825872?newtest=Y Do not worry about strange fields on the first page (like TOKEN:ATTRIBUTE_2) which will be replaced by personalised information during the e.mailing. Let me now about any issue you may meet. Franck -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mauro.isaja at eng.it Mon Jul 27 16:23:31 2015 From: mauro.isaja at eng.it (Mauro Isaja) Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 16:23:31 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] Survey FIWARE usage In-Reply-To: References: <255aee626a614287826e5ddd82fefdaf@winhexbeeu17.win.mail> Message-ID: Done! BR Mauro Mauro Isaja Engineering's Software Laboratory mauro.isaja at eng.it Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. Via Ferrini - Localit? San Martino - 53035 Monteriggioni (SI) Tel. +39-0577.1887100 Mob. +39-348.7866781 Skype mauro.isaja www.eng.it On 27 July 2015 at 15:57, stefano de panfilis wrote: > dear mauro and pasquale, > > can you please urgently add the se from fitman and finesce in the shared > google doc? > > thank you in advance! > > ciao, > stefano > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Franck Le Gall > Date: 2015-07-27 11:30 GMT+02:00 > Subject: [Fiware-coaches] Survey FIWARE usage > To: Juanjo Hierro , > > Dear all, > > > > We still miss coaches contributions to define the specific enablers in > columns R to V of the questionnaire ( > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Dijrn2gUsU0-dPhVqE9RXKi6MKkLnBVn_3YUEQWvCSs/edit#gid=0) > > > > > > *Usage of SEs from FI-Content2: Thierry* > > > *Usage of SEs from FITMAN: Engineering?* > > > *Usage of SEs from FINESCE: Pasquale* > > > > > > Additional question: could someone clarify me how is the overall score > computed, taking into account possible use of SEs ? > > > > Thank you > > Franck > > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-coaches mailing list > Fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org > https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-coaches > > > > > -- > Stefano De Panfilis > Chief Innovation Officer > Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. > via Riccardo Morandi 32 > 00148 Roma > Italy > > tel (direct): +39-06-8759-4253 > tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 > fax: +39-068307-4200 > cell: +39-335-7542-567 > skype: depa01 > twitter: @depa01 > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com Tue Jul 28 12:10:07 2015 From: juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 12:10:07 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] FIWARE usage assessment process announced Message-ID: <55B754FF.6070106@telefonica.com> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From thierry.nagellen at orange.com Wed Jul 29 14:27:08 2015 From: thierry.nagellen at orange.com (thierry.nagellen at orange.com) Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 12:27:08 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-coaches] Who is available to support Euroepan Pioneers on 10th or 11th of August? Message-ID: <1016_1438172829_55B8C69D_1016_7658_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925CCD4E3C@OPEXCLILM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> Hi all, Both Joel and myself are on vacations between the 10th and 12th of August and European Pioneer sis organizing a new Welcome Day for SMEs they have just selected (14 SMEs). The purpose for the coach is to provide a first overview of FIWARE Architecture in general and then to provide some additional presentations for some dedicated GEs (first priority will be for the following GEs: Wirecloud, Cosmos, IoT Broker, IoT Discovery) So if one of you is available for 1 day in Berlin (best option are 10th or 11th (to provide technical input at the beginning) it would be very nice. Thanks for your quick feedback because agenda will be sent to SMEs very soon! Thierry _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: