[Fiware-coaches] IMPORTANT FINAL CHECK BY FIWARE COACHES of questionnaire and evaluation dashboard to be used for FIWARE usage assessment

[Franck Le Gall]

See the answers to the questions directed to me in-line

Franck

De : fiware-coaches-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [mailto:fiware-coaches-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] De la part de Silvio Cretti
Envoyé : mercredi 15 juillet 2015 22:12
À : Juanjo Hierro
Cc : fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org
Objet : Re: [Fiware-coaches] IMPORTANT FINAL CHECK BY FIWARE COACHES of questionnaire and evaluation dashboard to be used for FIWARE usage assessment

Dear Juanjo, all
here my comments:
1) I think we should clarify to the SMEs the meaning of "planned" usage. What does it mean "planned" in this context? To have just an idea of use it? To have evaluated their usage? The have a roadmap/design for using it? ...
2) in D (Lab usage) we give higher score to a SME that decided to create its own cloud. Could we be a bit more precise on this? For example a SME could just use the IaaS Resurce Management GE (based on Openstack) and create its own cloud claiming the same score of another SME that is providing a fully fledged FIWARE instance.
2.1) Always related to D: the questionnaire and the scorecard are providing different questions. The questionnaire gives 3 points in case of a dedicated cloud and 4 for the usage of blueprint for deploying the app whereas the scorecard gives 3 for planning and 4 for implementation.
3) F (Degree of integration) is never used. Am I wrong? Is it made on purpose?
4) Big Data: here the difference between the second and the third questions is about "cluster" as opposed to "platform". Is it correct? What do we mean with "cluster" in this context? And with "platform"? Does it make sense to deploy Cosmos GE as "not a cluster". In my opinion yes but it is a trivial deployment (not suitable for Hadoop purposes). Or do we mean "hadoop federation" using the term "cluster"? I think this deserve a clarification.

Last but not least: I totally support the proposal of Frank to have a common tool. It provides an uniform interface and speed up things. My questions are:
a) you Frank need the list of SMEs + contact information. I image in order to configure the tool to send emails to the SMEs. Is it correct?
-> Yes. See my other e.mail
b) then we as coaches can check the answers provided and in case remind the SMEs, that did not yet respond, asking the tool to send a reminder. Correct?
-> Yes. I can even create account for the one willing to have a hand on the tool
c) does the tool provide automatically also the evaluation and the scoring of the answers? I mean the calculation?
-> The tool can. It would request me some additional hours to set this but nothing impossible
d) what do we as coaches have to do in order to use this tool?
-> It depends what you want to do (from managing your own pool of SMEs or simply accessing the results). I could do a rapid webinar to show how to play with it.

Thanks in advance and best regards,
  silvio


On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Juanjo Hierro <juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com<mailto:juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com>> wrote:
Dear all,

  I have carried out a final review of the questionnaire and the evaluation scorecard to be used for the assessment on the usage of FIWARE by SMEs/startups under the FIWARE Accelerator programme.

  I will post a message on basecamp announcing that we will launch the assessment process based on the proposed questionnaire and scorecard (which I have updated after this final review) tomorrow around 16:00 unless I hear any objections from you.    Therefore, please, take your time to review it.   I would appreciate if you also response to this email providing a confirmation that you have actually reviewed both tools and agree with the proposed changes.

  I have incorporated the following changes both in the questionnaire and scorecard:

  *   I have setup a distinction between "planned" usage and "actual" usage (the app has already implemented the criteria).   Therefore, the previous values where 0 (does NOT support either A or B), 1 (supports A) and 2 (supports B) translate into values 0 (does not plan to support either A or B), 1 (plans to support A), 2 (already implements A), 3 (plans to support B), 4 (already implements B).   My initial idea was to consider scores 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2, but it happens that google docs lead to problems if you use numbers with decimals, so I went for having 0 to 4.
  *   I have modified the meaning of values assigned as scores regarding context information management so that 3-4 points are given when integration with 3rd party systems as context information sources is considered.  Previously, we were giving maximum points if historic context information was registered in Cosmos for further analysis.   In line with this change, I have modified the scoring regarding usage of the Cosmos BigData GE so that the 1-2 points (previously 1 point) are given when historic context information data is registered in Cosmos for further analysis.
  *   I have aligned the meaning of values assigned for scoring usage of Wirecloud to the other GEs (CEP, Kurento, etc), so that 1-2 points (previously 1 point) are given when the GE is used and 3-4 points (previously 2 points) are given when it is used managing context information.
  *   I introduced several editorial comments on the questionnaire so that it becomes more readable and better aligned with the scorecard.

  I have created final versions of both the "Questionnaire for FIWARE Usage Assessment" and the "FIWARE Usage Assessment scorecard".   I have also make sure both get aligned.

  The final version of the "Questionnaire for FIWARE Usage Assessment" will be here:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BOv96zNeytDoPMecfFBuUDmisiLxlQKJUADIbtp8XKw/edit#<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BOv96zNeytDoPMecfFBuUDmisiLxlQKJUADIbtp8XKw/edit>

  The final version of the "FIWARE Usage Assessment scorecard" will be here:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Dijrn2gUsU0-dPhVqE9RXKi6MKkLnBVn_3YUEQWvCSs/edit?usp=sharing

  Cheers,


-- Juanjo



______________________________________________________



Coordinator and Chief Architect, FIWARE platform

CTO Industrial IoT, Telefónica



email: juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com<mailto:juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com>

twitter: @JuanjoHierro



You can follow FIWARE at:

  website:  http://www.fiware.org

  twitter:  @FIWARE

  facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242

  linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932

________________________________

Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilización, divulgación y/o copia sin autorización puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislación vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción.

The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete it.

Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinatário, pode conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial e é para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se não é vossa senhoria o destinatário indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utilização, divulgação e/ou cópia sem autorização pode estar proibida em virtude da legislação vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destruição

_______________________________________________
Fiware-coaches mailing list
Fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org<mailto:Fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org>
https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-coaches

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-coaches/attachments/20150715/e5bcd71e/attachment.html>