[Fiware-coaches] FRANK: IMPORTANT FINAL CHECK BY FIWARE COACHES of questionnaire and evaluation dashboard to be used for FIWARE usage assessment

[Silvio Cretti]

Hi all,
apart from the usage of one or the other tool, I din't understand if the
original idea was to ask the SMEs to fill in both the questionnaire doc and
the scorecard spreadsheet.
Why do they need to ask them to fill in the spreadsheet for a
self-assessment? Isn't it something we could derive quickly (maybe also
automatically if we are going to use a tool) from the questionnaire?
My proposal is this:
1) either use the questionnaire doc and then the coaches will do the
evaluation
2) or use an automatic tool that offers the questionnaire doc as an
"online" form (if there are problem with textual responses maybe
attachments can be used) and that can provide a first automatic evaluation
based on the scorecard.

Last question (due probably to the fact that I didn't attend the last
telcos): after completing the gathering of the answers, what are the next
steps? I mean do we plan to have two evaluations (one based on the answers
from the SMEs - yes/no/planned- and another, made by the FIWARE experts,
based also on the text/attachments provided) or just one? How are we going
to used the "textual" part provided?
Thanks in advance and best regards,
  silvio


On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 5:36 AM, Juanjo Hierro <
juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com> wrote:

>
> On 15/07/15 19:20, Franck Le Gall wrote:
>
>  Hello
>
>
>
> Some points:
>
>
>
> #1 I can for sure transfer the questionnaire to the on-line tool. I
> quickly transferred the 2 first set of questions here:
> http://survey.eglobalmark.com/index.php/survey/index/sid/825872/newtest/Y/lang/en
>
> It is currently available to anybody for test.
>
>
>
> Feedback welcome
>
>
>   I like the idea about the survey tool ... however my concern is about
> the editing possibilities for fields dealing with explanations ...
> particularly in terms of adding some figures (pictures) that may be helpful
> for explaining the ideas or in terms of styles for paragraphs of the
> explanations.   As an example, what if someone wishes to add a bullet list
> as part of their definition?
>
>   Any thoughts about how these issues may be overcome?  Would simply copy
> and paste of a figure, or a piece of text, work?   I have tried but I
> didn't succeed.
>
>   Does the tool allow to end the questionnaire adding some word file?
> I'm asking this because then one possibility could be to use the survey
> tool to gather just the info about the self-assessment (collection of
> yes/planned/no responses) instead of passing them a google docs spreadsheet
> template they have to download, complete and submit.
>
>   I would go for using this questionnaire tool for gathering input about
> the self-assessment, provided that a document with the complete response
> can be attached.  Please confirm this is feasible.
>
>
>
> #2 To move efficiently and track the respondents, I strongly suggest to
> use the mailing capabilities of the tool from which we could send
> personalized invitations as well as reminders to the one who did not answers
>
>
>
> => For that purpose, I would need the following table: Accelerator | SME
> name | Contact firstname | Contact lastname | Contact e.mail
>
> => If some coach prefer to manage their own instance of the survey this is
> doable
>
>
>   Unfortunately, I'm afraid the info you request might be difficult to
> gather and some of the FIWARE accelerator projects seem like they don't
> want to share that info if they have it.   What i can tell is that there is
> a mailing list (fiware-entrepreneurs at lists.fiware.org) where many of the
> entrepreneurs that are associated to some FIWARE Accelerator project are
> subscribed.   It is true that the list also include additional
> entrepreneurs, not necessary associated to a FIWARE Accelerator project,
> who have expressed their interest to be informed about developments
> regarding FIWARE.
>
>   I wonder whether that would help or we should create the requested
> table.   If so, then we only have the chance to ask for such a table to
> Ogilvy who is intended to build it (indeed, we populated the
> fiware-entrepreneurs mailing list based on the table they had).
>
>
>
> #3 I suggest to put most of the questions as mandatory to be answered. OK ?
>
>
>   I agree.   Indeed I believe all the questions should be mandatory (with
> the exception of the question on SEs since there may be applications that
> may not use SEs at all).
>
>
>
> #4 Our survey tool currently run under our domain name (eglobalmark.com).
> If we want him to run under FIWARE, I would either need a LAMP hosting on
> FIWARE side or redirecting a FIWARE sub-domain DNS to our server.
>
>
>   If we go for using the survey tool to gather the self-assessment by
> responders, then I can arrange the assignment of a LAMP server linked to
> the FIWARE website domain.   If we provide a VM with a LAMP stack already
> deployed and configured, would that be enough?
>
>   Cheers,
>
> -- Juanjo
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Kind regards
>
> Franck
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *De :* fiware-coaches-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [
> mailto:fiware-coaches-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org
> <fiware-coaches-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org>] *De la part de* Juanjo Hierro
> *Envoyé :* mercredi 15 juillet 2015 11:39
> *À :* fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org
> *Objet :* [Fiware-coaches] FRANK: IMPORTANT FINAL CHECK BY FIWARE COACHES
> of questionnaire and evaluation dashboard to be used for FIWARE usage
> assessment
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>   A question to Frank ... are we going to finally create a questionnaire
> using some sort of tool like the one you mentioned in our last confcall or
> should we ask each SME/startup to make their own copy of the questionnaire,
> answer it and send it to the corresponding coach?
>
>   I need an urgent answer to this so that I can take it into consideration
> for the message I would like to post on Basecamp.
>
>   For the rest, don't forget to review my previous email (again attached
> for your convenience.
>
>   Cheers,
>
> -- Juanjo
>
>
>
>  On 15/07/15 11:14, Juanjo Hierro wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
>   I have carried out a final review of the questionnaire and the
> evaluation scorecard to be used for the assessment on the usage of FIWARE
> by SMEs/startups under the FIWARE Accelerator programme.
>
>   I will post a message on basecamp announcing that we will launch the
> assessment process based on the proposed questionnaire and scorecard (which
> I have updated after this final review) tomorrow around 16:00 unless I hear
> any objections from you.    Therefore, please, take your time to review
> it.   I would appreciate if you also response to this email providing a
> confirmation that you have actually reviewed both tools and agree with the
> proposed changes.
>
>   I have incorporated the following changes both in the questionnaire and
> scorecard:
>
>    - I have setup a distinction between "planned" usage and "actual"
>    usage (the app has already implemented the criteria).   Therefore, the
>    previous values where 0 (does NOT support either A or B), 1 (supports A)
>    and 2 (supports B) translate into values 0 (does not plan to support either
>    A or B), 1 (plans to support A), 2 (already implements A), 3 (plans to
>    support B), 4 (already implements B).   My initial idea was to consider
>    scores 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2, but it happens that google docs lead to
>    problems if you use numbers with decimals, so I went for having 0 to 4.
>    - I have modified the meaning of values assigned as scores regarding
>    context information management so that 3-4 points are given when
>    integration with 3rd party systems as context information sources is
>    considered.  Previously, we were giving maximum points if historic context
>    information was registered in Cosmos for further analysis.   In line with
>    this change, I have modified the scoring regarding usage of the Cosmos
>    BigData GE so that the 1-2 points (previously 1 point) are given when
>    historic context information data is registered in Cosmos for further
>    analysis.
>    - I have aligned the meaning of values assigned for scoring usage of
>    Wirecloud to the other GEs (CEP, Kurento, etc), so that 1-2 points
>    (previously 1 point) are given when the GE is used and 3-4 points
>    (previously 2 points) are given when it is used managing context
>    information.
>    - I introduced several editorial comments on the questionnaire so that
>    it becomes more readable and better aligned with the scorecard.
>
>
>   I have created final versions of both the "Questionnaire for FIWARE
> Usage Assessment" and the "FIWARE Usage Assessment scorecard".   I have
> also make sure both get aligned.
>
>   The final version of the "Questionnaire for FIWARE Usage Assessment"
> will be here:
>
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BOv96zNeytDoPMecfFBuUDmisiLxlQKJUADIbtp8XKw/edit#
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BOv96zNeytDoPMecfFBuUDmisiLxlQKJUADIbtp8XKw/edit>
>
>
>   The final version of the "FIWARE Usage Assessment scorecard" will be
> here:
>
>
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Dijrn2gUsU0-dPhVqE9RXKi6MKkLnBVn_3YUEQWvCSs/edit?usp=sharing
>
>
>   Cheers,
>
>  -- Juanjo
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________
>
>
>
> Coordinator and Chief Architect, FIWARE platform
>
> CTO Industrial IoT, Telefónica
>
>
>
> email: juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com
>
> twitter: @JuanjoHierro
>
>
>
> You can follow FIWARE at:
>
>   website:  http://www.fiware.org
>
>   twitter:  @FIWARE
>
>   facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242
>
>   linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
>
> Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario,
> puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso
> exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el
> destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilización,
> divulgación y/o copia sin autorización puede estar prohibida en virtud de
> la legislación vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos
> que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su
> destrucción.
>
> The information contained in this transmission is privileged and
> confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
> entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended
> recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
> copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received
> this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the
> sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete
> it.
>
> Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinatário,
> pode conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial e é para uso exclusivo
> da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se não é vossa senhoria o destinatário
> indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utilização, divulgação e/ou
> cópia sem autorização pode estar proibida em virtude da legislação vigente.
> Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique
> imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destruição
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario,
> puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso
> exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el
> destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilización,
> divulgación y/o copia sin autorización puede estar prohibida en virtud de
> la legislación vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos
> que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su
> destrucción.
>
> The information contained in this transmission is privileged and
> confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
> entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended
> recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
> copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received
> this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the
> sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete
> it.
>
> Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinatário,
> pode conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial e é para uso exclusivo
> da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se não é vossa senhoria o destinatário
> indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utilização, divulgação e/ou
> cópia sem autorização pode estar proibida em virtude da legislação vigente.
> Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique
> imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destruição
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fiware-coaches mailing list
> Fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org
> https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-coaches
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-coaches/attachments/20150716/e2de6412/attachment.html>