[Fiware-coaches] R: Object Storage = GE ?

consoft-fiwarecoach at consoft.it consoft-fiwarecoach at consoft.it
Mon Jun 8 14:54:55 CEST 2015


Hello Franck, all,

I think you're raising a good point.
I have a similar situation with some teams under CEED Tech, so I'm quite interested on it.
Up to now I think we can consider the Object Storage as a "real" GE, since it's part of the catalogue and it's available in the FIWARE Lab, but then I suggest to discuss a little bit about this enabler and decide if we can put the Object Storage at the same level of the other GEs (for future Open Calls).

Best regards,
Marco

Da: fiware-coaches-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [mailto:fiware-coaches-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] Per conto di Franck Le Gall
Inviato: lunedì 8 giugno 2015 14:13
A: fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org
Oggetto: [Fiware-coaches] Object Storage = GE ?

Hello

One of the SMEs going to be evaluated within FICHE pretends to make use of the Object storage GE. They directly get it from the openstack repository https://github.com/openstack/swift (link provided in the catalogue) and deploy it within their IBM bluemix.

Questions:
* Are there any specific interfaces added by FIWARE on top of the Object Storage swift implementation ?
* If not, why is the Object Storage considered as a GE ? I see it more as a resources maintained outside of FIWARE  that we recommend to use. Having 2 different access point (FIWARE + Openstack) to the same resource is confusing

Similar questions are for IDM which is actually 100% based on OpenStack Keystone (https://jira.fiware.org/browse/HELC-562).

Many thanks
Franck


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-coaches/attachments/20150608/5595d5d0/attachment.html>


More information about the Fiware-coaches mailing list

You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy   Cookies policy