[Fiware-coaches] FIWARE assessment

[Leandro Guillén]

En 16 de jun. de 2015 5:02 p. m., en 5:02 p. m., Leandro Guillen <leandro.guillen at imdea.org> escrito:
>Hi all,
>
>I want to share what we have been doing in the IMPACT accelerator since
>
>I believe it matches really good what we have been discussing today in 
>the coaches call. Hopefully this is useful.
>
>For the FIWARE evaluation they ask the following (all are mandatory):
>
>     - Explain the usage of your technology and how FIWARE is used 
>within it.
>         - Max 2000 characters
>     - Provide an architecture graph. It must show clearly how FIWARE 
>enablers are used in conjunction with other technology assets.
>     - Which of the IMPACT favored GEs are you planning to use?
>       - A list is presented with GEs that are considered more core to 
>the FIWARE experience. Here the FIWARE expert does the valuation of the
>
>GEs selected.
>
>Then, depending on the answers, the points are awarded like so:
>
>     - 0 points
>         - No FIWARE commitment or applicability shown.
>         - Maybe there is no architecture graph or no selection of GEs.
>         - This is given to projects that only want the cloud to run 
>their apps, or they don't state that plan to use FIWARE.
>     - 3 points
>         - FIWARE usage is poorly explained.
>       - Architecture does not show their _written_ plan to use FIWARE.
>         - Only plan to use identity management or storage of FIWARE.
>     - 4 points
>      - FIWARE usage is fair, although there could be some improvement.
>      - Solid selection of FIWARE GEs, there may be others to consider.
>         - Obvious misconception of a FIWARE technology that can be 
>easily fixed (e.g. using CEP where Orion makes more sense).
>     - 5 points
>         - FIWARE usage addresses all relevant aspects.
>         - Architecture makes sense.
>         - Good selection of GEs for a given problem.
>
>In the case of IMPACT, since they have around 20 projects to evaluate
>so 
>we are able to do one on one interviews (skype) with them where they 
>present what they've been doing and how the implementation is going. We
>
>assess this by (in max 15 minutes for everything):
>
>     - Have them do a presentation on the results.
>     - Show a demo of the project and maybe some code as well.
>     - Short Q&A.
>
>This helps to have a great vision on how they are doing first-hand.
>This 
>took a couple of days.
>
>So as a result of all this there is a spreadsheet where each startup 
>states what GEs they will use (strong commitment, unless all hell
>breaks 
>lose). I must say that IMPACT has come a long way in how the evaluate 
>FIWARE, and it feels that it is working really good now.
>
>Regards,
>Leandro
>_______________________________________________
>Fiware-creatifi-coaching mailing list
>Fiware-creatifi-coaching at lists.fi-ware.org
>https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-creatifi-coaching
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-coaches/attachments/20150616/86e2b8ef/attachment.html>