Dear Juanjo and all, We have precisely the same problem at the moment. I thought we were going to base our assessment of SMEs on their survey inputs. Even though I attended some of the telcos, I understood that this was the methodology we were going to follow. Without the survey inputs, It is very difficult for the coaches to know the exact level of detail required for the assessment for each SME. Now I am not sure how we can complete this type of assessment for each SMEs by Sep 3. Is this really necessary for all the SMEs? Or just the ones selected by the accelerators for the business potential (as we also received requests for that type of assessment for the same deadline from the accelerators)? I asked about this also in the attached email to the list on August 13, with no answers, I feel the process is not so clear to everyone. Any advice on how to proceed would be appreciated… Kind regards, ilknur From: fiware-coaching-atos-bounces at lists.atosresearch.eu [mailto:fiware-coaching-atos-bounces at lists.atosresearch.eu] On Behalf Of Silvio Cretti Sent: Friday, August 28, 2015 4:48 PM To: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA Cc: Pablo Honrubia; fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org; Angeles Tejado Subject: Re: [Fiware-coaching-atos] [Fiware-coaches] FIWARE assessment: VERY IMPORTANT Thanks Juanjo for this. Actually it was not clear to me that the two assessments were disconnected and this because the info we have at the moment as coaches is not always enough to complete the evaluation. Moreover I didn't even recall any email or minutes that stated this. And this of course is a pity because we lost lot of time. Indeed I asked also about the process in my email of July 16 (see last paragraph) exectly about the relationship between the two assessments but no answer has been provided. Anyway at the moment what I can do is just to fill in the evaluation with the info passed to me by the accelerator but of course the final quality of the assassment will be poor. This is what I can do for the 3rd of September. Just to take advantage of this misunderstanding, next time I suggest to keep the minutes of the telcos and to clearly define a written process. Thanks and best regards. Silvio On 28 Aug 2015 14:31, "Juanjo Hierro" <juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com<mailto:juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com>> wrote: Dear Silvio, Angeles, Some of the answers provided by Angeles were wrong so let me clarify things now for ever, between lines. Hopefully, now things get more clear. On 28/08/15 14:09, Angeles Tejado wrote: Hi again! Thanks a lot Silvio. answers in red (between lines) Angeles Tejado FIWARE Press Office OgilvyOne Worldwide Madrid Office: +34-91-4512179<tel:%2B34-91-4512179> Cell: +34-608508873<tel:%2B34-608508873> E-mail: angeles.tejado at ogilvy.com<mailto:angeles.tejado at ogilvy.com> ________________________________ De: Silvio Cretti <silvio.cretti at create-net.org><mailto:silvio.cretti at create-net.org> Enviado: viernes, 28 de agosto de 2015 13:25 Para: Angeles Tejado Cc: Juanjo Hierro; Franck Le Gall; fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org<mailto:fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org>; Pablo Honrubia Asunto: Re: [Fiware-coaches] FIWARE assessment: VERY IMPORTANT Thanks Angeles, so just to recap: 1) for the moment we forget the Pablo's form and guidelines posted on basecamp for the technical part. We assume that you will contact us in the future when it is needed to review and fill it in. Yes... Not exactly forget but first concentrating in the link posted by Juanjo and the deadlines he proposes. But Pablo's form will need to be filled in also with your help/assistance. True. 2) we, as coaches, have to fill in the first link posted by Juanjo based in the results and documentation collected from the survey. Yes NOT AT ALL. You had to fill the spreadsheet in the first link posted by me and this is an assessment you may perform without taking into account at all the documentation collected from the survey. Indeed, if you ask me, the process should be as follows: 1. You fill the spreadsheet with your own assessment based on your knowledge about the work that the given startup/SME is doing (you should know how each of the startup/SMEs, at least for those startup/accelerator projects which have a relatively small number of SMEs/startups). 2. When the second spreadsheet with the results of the survey is completed, you double-check your assessment with the self-assessment made by the startup/SMEs. 3. For those cases where there are big differences between your assessment and the self-assessment, I would carry out a more careful review to double-check whether you have provide a wrong assessment (maybe because you didn't have all the information or you were not updated about progress made by the startup/SME regarding adoption of FIWARE). 3) the second link posted by Juanjo will instead be filled in automatically by the answers to the survey provided by the SMEs. Yes True Is all this correct? Yes No. Your assumption regarding statement 2) was not correct. If yes I am a bit concerned about the date of September 3rd to finish the evaluation: I understood that this should be based on the info collected during the survey and we will have access to this info not before September 1st. Then the date of September 3rd is a bit too much aggressive. I assume that you'll push smes to fill in the survey... As per Juanjo's request and given that there's a confcall Sept 7th the deadlines are definitive. Precisely because you don't depend on the spreadsheet related to the self-assessment made by the SMEs/startups, you shouldn't wait until the results of the survey get collected. Ideally, you should have already started with the assessment after day one that the scoreboard was ready. The spreadsheet with results of the survey, once again, is only for double-checking, contrast. Indeed, nothing should stop providing an assessment of a SME/startup even if they haven't completed the survey. After all, the completion of the survey by the startups/SMEs should be found by them as an opportunity to make sure their voice is heard and the double-checking/contrast exercise is run. Best regards, -- Juanjo Thanks and best regards, silvio On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Angeles Tejado <angeles.tejado at ogilvy.com<mailto:angeles.tejado at ogilvy.com>> wrote: Hello Silvio. 2.5) We, as coaches, should probably be contacted by our accelerator program in order to provide this evaluation. Am I wrong? For the moment I didn't receive anything from my accelerator (CreatiFI) Accelerators are sending business assessment to the Press Office. We are the ones that should receive both assessments for a final review in terms of communication. Obviously, we will recap all the information and share with the community. We are also in contact with accelerators from a business side and with Juanjo for a recap on the technical side. However, it's expected from coaches to be in contact with their accelerator... 1) What is the FIWARE usage assessment score card you are referring to? Is it the one that has been posted by Pablo in Bsaecamp for the technical part? I don't think that Juanjo refers to the subgrantee appraisal form shared by Pablo. The final score card is the first link that Juanjo have shared in his email below https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Dijrn2gUsU0-dPhVqE9RXKi6MKkLnBVn_3YUEQWvCSs/edit?usp=sharing - Final FIWARE Usage Assessment Scorecard (by coaches and FIWARE experts) After your final tech assessment (following the guidelines that Juanjo has sent and using the score cards that he has sent) we (press office) need to highlight the different aspects that could be of interest from a communication perspective. And this is the content of the appraisal form shared by Pablo... We will need you to fill in Pablo's form after the whole tech assesmment has finished (this is to "translate it" into a more understandable language). Having said that... The answers to the rest of your questions should be: 2.0) Are we going to use the survey result to fill in that (Pablo's) score card? NO. 2.1) Do we have to evaluate only the SME selected by the business evaluation as the guidelines are stating? NO. Your tech evaluation is independent... You must review all the SMES asigned to the accelerators you are coaching. Press Office will check the business results with tech results and match them (if bussiness results and tech results do not match... we will analyze and maybe come back to coaches to review business cases that have not been selected from a tech perspective and same with the accelerators for the tech succes cases that do not have good results in terms of business... this is our work) 2.2) That form refers to some KPI. Which ones are to be considered? I will check with Pablo... maybe you, as coachers, can help us to define KPIs that, obviously, will have something to be with the different categories you are evaluating in the score card. 2.3) That form refers to a "technical excellence rating": how can we determine this? I suppose We should work on it with Juanjo... after the assessment is finished. 2.4) How can we guarantee to provide a uniform rate across the different accelerators/evaluators? Same as 2.3 3) if the answer to the question 2 is no, then which is the score card to be filled in? The one above and added by you on 4/ :) 4) regarding to our score card (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Dijrn2gUsU0-dPhVqE9RXKi6MKkLnBVn_3YUEQWvCSs/edit?usp=sharing) my fieeling is that it will be filled in automatially/or almost automatically by the survey tool. Am I wrong? The one which is filled in automatically is this one (the second that Juanjo has shared in his email) https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1J8qACLN0MjuMIPY-XVdkhZbvGMPASA70IqxxLyNIg3s/edit?usp=sharing Let me know if this makes sense for you (hope that Juanjo will take a look at this - I hope not to be wrong) Kind regards. Angeles Tejado FIWARE Press Office OgilvyOne Worldwide Madrid Office: +34-91-4512179<tel:%2B34-91-4512179> Cell: +34-608508873<tel:%2B34-608508873> E-mail: angeles.tejado at ogilvy.com<mailto:angeles.tejado at ogilvy.com> ________________________________ De: Silvio Cretti <silvio.cretti at create-net.org<mailto:silvio.cretti at create-net.org>> Enviado: viernes, 28 de agosto de 2015 9:43 Para: Juanjo Hierro Cc: Franck Le Gall; fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org<mailto:fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org>; Angeles Tejado; Pablo Honrubia Asunto: Re: [Fiware-coaches] FIWARE assessment: VERY IMPORTANT Hi Juanjo, all I think here we have to clarify something (please see also my email of August 13st that didn't get any answer): 1) What is the FIWARE usage assessment score card you are referring to? Is it the one that has been posted by Pablo in Bsaecamp for the technical part? 2) If the answer to the previous question is yes, then: 2.0) Are we going to use the survey result to fill in that score card? 2.1) Do we have to evaluate only the SME selected by the business evaluation as the guidelines are stating? 2.2) That form refers to some KPI. Which ones are to be considered? 2.3) That form refers to a "technical excellence rating": how can we determine this? 2.4) How can we guarantee to provide a uniform rate across the different accelerators/evaluators? 2.5) We, as coaches, should probably be contacted by our accelerator program in order to provide this evaluation. Am I wrong? For the moment I didn't receive anything from my accelerator (CreatiFI) 3) if the answer to the question 2 is no, then which is the score card to be filled in? 4) regarding to our score card (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Dijrn2gUsU0-dPhVqE9RXKi6MKkLnBVn_3YUEQWvCSs/edit?usp=sharing) my fieeling is that it will be filled in automatially/or almost automatically by the survey tool. Am I wrong? Thank in advance for the answers you can provide. Best regards silvio On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Juanjo Hierro <juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com<mailto:juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com>> wrote: Folks, I don't know if there has been some progress since the last report from Frank regarding progress on the on-line survey on August 24th (see attached message) ... but the dealine of August 31st is around the corner and it would be worth sending a reminder to startups/SMEs. Coaches have to play an active role demanding a response from the startup/SME within the FIWARE Accelerator programme. @Franck: could you generate updated statistics regarding responses to the survey? Given said this, I remind you that this survey will help to get the input about the self-assessment that the startups/SMEs made themselves regarding FIWARE usage. HOWEVER, the real assessment has to be performed by you, that is, you should complete the FIWARE usage assessment score card regarding projects within the Accelerator programme you coach. Please complete your assessment by Thursday, September 3 EOB. If you need help from FIWARE experts please let Stefano and myself know. On September 7th, Stefano and myself have been invited to attend a follow-up confcall with the EC and we should be able to report that the exercise is complete. I also remind you that you should provide the data of your assessment on the following shared spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Dijrn2gUsU0-dPhVqE9RXKi6MKkLnBVn_3YUEQWvCSs/edit?usp=sharing We may upload the results of the survey (self-assessment by the startups/SMEs on their projects) in the following, different, spreadsheet I have just created. Note that this has the same structure as the previous but we should place the name of the startup/SME instead of the name of the evaluator in column C: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1J8qACLN0MjuMIPY-XVdkhZbvGMPASA70IqxxLyNIg3s/edit?usp=sharing I hope that Franck will be able to configure a tool that would allow to automatically assign values in this second spreadsheet based on data gathered through the on-line survey. I copy Angeles and Pablo from Ogilvy who are monitoring collection of input regarding the business impact assessment, so that we all know where we are regarding the process of assessment. Cheers, -- Juanjo ______________________________________________________ Coordinator and Chief Architect, FIWARE platform CTO Industrial IoT, Telefónica email: juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com<mailto:juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com> twitter: @JuanjoHierro You can follow FIWARE at: website: http://www.fiware.org twitter: @FIWARE facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 24/08/15 23:13, Franck Le Gall wrote: Dear coaches, Here is the return rate((number of received answers compared to number of invitation sent, per accelerator) on the survey: NB % FABulous 2 4% FINODEX 6 13% FrontiesCities 9 32% INCENSe 1 7% FRACTALS 3 7% FI-ADOPT 3 9% SmartAgriFood 5 10% FInish 2 6% SOUL-FI 9 7% IMPACT 5 26% SpeedUp!Europe 16 20% EuropeanPioneers 3 25% CEED Tech 7 22% CREAtiFi 30 53% FI-C3 1 9% FICHe 3 15% TOTAL 105 16% Make sure to motivate your SMEs to answer. Silvio with Creatifi is the forerunner ;) Franck _______________________________________________ Fiware-coaches mailing list Fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org<mailto:Fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org> https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-coaches ________________________________ Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilización, divulgación y/o copia sin autorización puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislación vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción. The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete it. Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinatário, pode conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial e é para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se não é vossa senhoria o destinatário indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utilização, divulgação e/ou cópia sem autorização pode estar proibida em virtude da legislação vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destruição _______________________________________________ Fiware-coaches mailing list Fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org<mailto:Fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org> https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-coaches Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message, you should destroy this message. For more information on WPP's business ethical standards and corporate responsibility policies, please refer to WPP's website. [https://assets.ogilvy.com/truffles_email/wwit_signatures/canneslion-12-13-14-15.jpg] Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message, you should destroy this message. For more information on WPP's business ethical standards and corporate responsibility policies, please refer to WPP's website. ________________________________ Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilización, divulgación y/o copia sin autorización puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislación vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción. The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete it. Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinatário, pode conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial e é para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se não é vossa senhoria o destinatário indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utilização, divulgação e/ou cópia sem autorização pode estar proibida em virtude da legislação vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destruição Bu mesaj ve ekleri gönderilen kişiye özeldir ve gizli bilgiler içerebilir. Eğer mesajın gönderilmek istendiği kişi değilseniz lütfen kopyalamayınız, başkalarına göndermeyiniz ve göndericiyi bilgilendiriniz. Internet üzerinden gönderilen mesajların güvenli ve hatasız olduğunun garantisi olmadığından Atos grubu mesajın içeriğinden sorumlu tutulamaz. Göndericinin bilgisayarı anti-virüs sistemleri tarafından taranmaktadır, ancak yine de mesajın virüs içermediği garanti edilemez ve gönderici, meydana gelebilecek zararlardan sorumlu tutulamaz. This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavors to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-coaches/attachments/20150901/71109f56/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: "Chulani, Ilknur" <ilknur.chulani at atos.net> Subject: Process on Accelerator success stories? Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 09:23:49 +0000 Size: 167216 URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-coaches/attachments/20150901/71109f56/attachment.mht>
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy