Dear Pasquale, all, In CEED Tech, we already had something similar to your “technical milestone”, so I have one FIWARE usage report from each Startup in CEED Tech. Unfortunately, the detail level of such reports is not at the same level of the survey, so I will need to contact some of the startups in order to have detailed information. Of course this is feasible, but it’s taking some extra-time (most of such startups will not answer me in a very short time). Best regards, Marco Marco Terrinoni Consoft Sistemi s.p.a. BU Application Via Pio VII 127 - 10127 - Torino Tel (+39) 011 3161571 Fax (+39) 011 3161583 Da: fiware-coaches-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [mailto:fiware-coaches-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] Per conto di Pasquale Andriani Inviato: martedì 1 settembre 2015 18:09 A: Chulani, Ilknur <ilknur.chulani at atos.net> Cc: Pablo Honrubia <pablo.honrubia at ogilvy.com>; fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org; Angeles Tejado <angeles.tejado at ogilvy.com> Oggetto: Re: [Fiware-coaches] [Fiware-coaching-atos] FIWARE assessment: VERY IMPORTANT Dear Juanjo, All, following Ilknur and Silvio replies, as coach of INCENSe , I have to inform you that the process you mentioned (to have two different FIWARE Usage Assessment Scorecard) is new to me and never mentioned in meeting minutes that I have. I've never been aware of the need of an independent coaches' assessment. I always thought that the survey input should be used to fill only one scorecard based on each SMEs input to the survey. Going to the specific case of INCENSe, there is one more issue: the first technical milestone has been fixed for September 7th (1st open call winners started in June) and right now (apart from attending some phone call with some of them and answering questions through emails), I do not have a clear status about each SMEs and their respective FIWARE usage. As a first option, what I can do for September 3rd is to report the self-assessment (taking into account SMEs input to the survey) into both scorecards. A second option is: 1) to wait all the technical deliverables that should come within the INCENSe Tech. Milestone on September 7th to be relased 2) let me evaluate them 3) let me fill in the scorecard according to what I can feel from their own documentation. Any advice on how to proceed would be appreciated. How the other coaches are going to proceed? Kind regards, P. Pasquale Andriani Direzione Ricerca e Innovazione - Research & Development Lab pasquale.andriani at eng.it<mailto:pasquale.andriani at eng.it> Engineering Ingegneria Informatica spa Via Riccardo Morandi, 32 - 00148 Roma Tel. +39-06.87594138<tel:%2B39-06.87594138> Mob. +39 3924698746<tel:%2B39%203924698746> Fax. +39-06.83074408<tel:%2B39-06.83074408> www.eng.it<http://www.eng.it> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Chulani, Ilknur <ilknur.chulani at atos.net<mailto:ilknur.chulani at atos.net>> wrote: Dear Juanjo and all, We have precisely the same problem at the moment. I thought we were going to base our assessment of SMEs on their survey inputs. Even though I attended some of the telcos, I understood that this was the methodology we were going to follow. Without the survey inputs, It is very difficult for the coaches to know the exact level of detail required for the assessment for each SME. Now I am not sure how we can complete this type of assessment for each SMEs by Sep 3. Is this really necessary for all the SMEs? Or just the ones selected by the accelerators for the business potential (as we also received requests for that type of assessment for the same deadline from the accelerators)? I asked about this also in the attached email to the list on August 13, with no answers, I feel the process is not so clear to everyone. Any advice on how to proceed would be appreciated… Kind regards, ilknur From: fiware-coaching-atos-bounces at lists.atosresearch.eu<mailto:fiware-coaching-atos-bounces at lists.atosresearch.eu> [mailto:fiware-coaching-atos-bounces at lists.atosresearch.eu<mailto:fiware-coaching-atos-bounces at lists.atosresearch.eu>] On Behalf Of Silvio Cretti Sent: Friday, August 28, 2015 4:48 PM To: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA Cc: Pablo Honrubia; fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org<mailto:fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org>; Angeles Tejado Subject: Re: [Fiware-coaching-atos] [Fiware-coaches] FIWARE assessment: VERY IMPORTANT Thanks Juanjo for this. Actually it was not clear to me that the two assessments were disconnected and this because the info we have at the moment as coaches is not always enough to complete the evaluation. Moreover I didn't even recall any email or minutes that stated this. And this of course is a pity because we lost lot of time. Indeed I asked also about the process in my email of July 16 (see last paragraph) exectly about the relationship between the two assessments but no answer has been provided. Anyway at the moment what I can do is just to fill in the evaluation with the info passed to me by the accelerator but of course the final quality of the assassment will be poor. This is what I can do for the 3rd of September. Just to take advantage of this misunderstanding, next time I suggest to keep the minutes of the telcos and to clearly define a written process. Thanks and best regards. Silvio On 28 Aug 2015 14:31, "Juanjo Hierro" <juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com<mailto:juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com>> wrote: Dear Silvio, Angeles, Some of the answers provided by Angeles were wrong so let me clarify things now for ever, between lines. Hopefully, now things get more clear. On 28/08/15 14:09, Angeles Tejado wrote: Hi again! Thanks a lot Silvio. answers in red (between lines) Angeles Tejado FIWARE Press Office OgilvyOne Worldwide Madrid Office: +34-91-4512179<tel:%2B34-91-4512179> Cell: +34-608508873<tel:%2B34-608508873> E-mail: angeles.tejado at ogilvy.com<mailto:angeles.tejado at ogilvy.com> ________________________________ De: Silvio Cretti <silvio.cretti at create-net.org><mailto:silvio.cretti at create-net.org> Enviado: viernes, 28 de agosto de 2015 13:25 Para: Angeles Tejado Cc: Juanjo Hierro; Franck Le Gall; fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org<mailto:fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org>; Pablo Honrubia Asunto: Re: [Fiware-coaches] FIWARE assessment: VERY IMPORTANT Thanks Angeles, so just to recap: 1) for the moment we forget the Pablo's form and guidelines posted on basecamp for the technical part. We assume that you will contact us in the future when it is needed to review and fill it in. Yes... Not exactly forget but first concentrating in the link posted by Juanjo and the deadlines he proposes. But Pablo's form will need to be filled in also with your help/assistance. True. 2) we, as coaches, have to fill in the first link posted by Juanjo based in the results and documentation collected from the survey. Yes NOT AT ALL. You had to fill the spreadsheet in the first link posted by me and this is an assessment you may perform without taking into account at all the documentation collected from the survey. Indeed, if you ask me, the process should be as follows: 1. You fill the spreadsheet with your own assessment based on your knowledge about the work that the given startup/SME is doing (you should know how each of the startup/SMEs, at least for those startup/accelerator projects which have a relatively small number of SMEs/startups). 2. When the second spreadsheet with the results of the survey is completed, you double-check your assessment with the self-assessment made by the startup/SMEs. 3. For those cases where there are big differences between your assessment and the self-assessment, I would carry out a more careful review to double-check whether you have provide a wrong assessment (maybe because you didn't have all the information or you were not updated about progress made by the startup/SME regarding adoption of FIWARE). 3) the second link posted by Juanjo will instead be filled in automatically by the answers to the survey provided by the SMEs. Yes True Is all this correct? Yes No. Your assumption regarding statement 2) was not correct. If yes I am a bit concerned about the date of September 3rd to finish the evaluation: I understood that this should be based on the info collected during the survey and we will have access to this info not before September 1st. Then the date of September 3rd is a bit too much aggressive. I assume that you'll push smes to fill in the survey... As per Juanjo's request and given that there's a confcall Sept 7th the deadlines are definitive. Precisely because you don't depend on the spreadsheet related to the self-assessment made by the SMEs/startups, you shouldn't wait until the results of the survey get collected. Ideally, you should have already started with the assessment after day one that the scoreboard was ready. The spreadsheet with results of the survey, once again, is only for double-checking, contrast. Indeed, nothing should stop providing an assessment of a SME/startup even if they haven't completed the survey. After all, the completion of the survey by the startups/SMEs should be found by them as an opportunity to make sure their voice is heard and the double-checking/contrast exercise is run. Best regards, -- Juanjo Thanks and best regards, silvio On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Angeles Tejado <angeles.tejado at ogilvy.com<mailto:angeles.tejado at ogilvy.com>> wrote: Hello Silvio. 2.5) We, as coaches, should probably be contacted by our accelerator program in order to provide this evaluation. Am I wrong? For the moment I didn't receive anything from my accelerator (CreatiFI) Accelerators are sending business assessment to the Press Office. We are the ones that should receive both assessments for a final review in terms of communication. Obviously, we will recap all the information and share with the community. We are also in contact with accelerators from a business side and with Juanjo for a recap on the technical side. However, it's expected from coaches to be in contact with their accelerator... 1) What is the FIWARE usage assessment score card you are referring to? Is it the one that has been posted by Pablo in Bsaecamp for the technical part? I don't think that Juanjo refers to the subgrantee appraisal form shared by Pablo. The final score card is the first link that Juanjo have shared in his email below https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Dijrn2gUsU0-dPhVqE9RXKi6MKkLnBVn_3YUEQWvCSs/edit?usp=sharing - Final FIWARE Usage Assessment Scorecard (by coaches and FIWARE experts) After your final tech assessment (following the guidelines that Juanjo has sent and using the score cards that he has sent) we (press office) need to highlight the different aspects that could be of interest from a communication perspective. And this is the content of the appraisal form shared by Pablo... We will need you to fill in Pablo's form after the whole tech assesmment has finished (this is to "translate it" into a more understandable language). Having said that... The answers to the rest of your questions should be: 2.0) Are we going to use the survey result to fill in that (Pablo's) score card? NO. 2.1) Do we have to evaluate only the SME selected by the business evaluation as the guidelines are stating? NO. Your tech evaluation is independent... You must review all the SMES asigned to the accelerators you are coaching. Press Office will check the business results with tech results and match them (if bussiness results and tech results do not match... we will analyze and maybe come back to coaches to review business cases that have not been selected from a tech perspective and same with the accelerators for the tech succes cases that do not have good results in terms of business... this is our work) 2.2) That form refers to some KPI. Which ones are to be considered? I will check with Pablo... maybe you, as coachers, can help us to define KPIs that, obviously, will have something to be with the different categories you are evaluating in the score card. 2.3) That form refers to a "technical excellence rating": how can we determine this? I suppose We should work on it with Juanjo... after the assessment is finished. 2.4) How can we guarantee to provide a uniform rate across the different accelerators/evaluators? Same as 2.3 3) if the answer to the question 2 is no, then which is the score card to be filled in? The one above and added by you on 4/ :) 4) regarding to our score card (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Dijrn2gUsU0-dPhVqE9RXKi6MKkLnBVn_3YUEQWvCSs/edit?usp=sharing) my fieeling is that it will be filled in automatially/or almost automatically by the survey tool. Am I wrong? The one which is filled in automatically is this one (the second that Juanjo has shared in his email) https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1J8qACLN0MjuMIPY-XVdkhZbvGMPASA70IqxxLyNIg3s/edit?usp=sharing Let me know if this makes sense for you (hope that Juanjo will take a look at this - I hope not to be wrong) Kind regards. Angeles Tejado FIWARE Press Office OgilvyOne Worldwide Madrid Office: +34-91-4512179<tel:%2B34-91-4512179> Cell: +34-608508873<tel:%2B34-608508873> E-mail: angeles.tejado at ogilvy.com<mailto:angeles.tejado at ogilvy.com> ________________________________ De: Silvio Cretti <silvio.cretti at create-net.org<mailto:silvio.cretti at create-net.org>> Enviado: viernes, 28 de agosto de 2015 9:43 Para: Juanjo Hierro Cc: Franck Le Gall; fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org<mailto:fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org>; Angeles Tejado; Pablo Honrubia Asunto: Re: [Fiware-coaches] FIWARE assessment: VERY IMPORTANT Hi Juanjo, all I think here we have to clarify something (please see also my email of August 13st that didn't get any answer): 1) What is the FIWARE usage assessment score card you are referring to? Is it the one that has been posted by Pablo in Bsaecamp for the technical part? 2) If the answer to the previous question is yes, then: 2.0) Are we going to use the survey result to fill in that score card? 2.1) Do we have to evaluate only the SME selected by the business evaluation as the guidelines are stating? 2.2) That form refers to some KPI. Which ones are to be considered? 2.3) That form refers to a "technical excellence rating": how can we determine this? 2.4) How can we guarantee to provide a uniform rate across the different accelerators/evaluators? 2.5) We, as coaches, should probably be contacted by our accelerator program in order to provide this evaluation. Am I wrong? For the moment I didn't receive anything from my accelerator (CreatiFI) 3) if the answer to the question 2 is no, then which is the score card to be filled in? 4) regarding to our score card (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Dijrn2gUsU0-dPhVqE9RXKi6MKkLnBVn_3YUEQWvCSs/edit?usp=sharing) my fieeling is that it will be filled in automatially/or almost automatically by the survey tool. Am I wrong? Thank in advance for the answers you can provide. Best regards silvio On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Juanjo Hierro <juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com<mailto:juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com>> wrote: Folks, I don't know if there has been some progress since the last report from Frank regarding progress on the on-line survey on August 24th (see attached message) ... but the dealine of August 31st is around the corner and it would be worth sending a reminder to startups/SMEs. Coaches have to play an active role demanding a response from the startup/SME within the FIWARE Accelerator programme. @Franck: could you generate updated statistics regarding responses to the survey? Given said this, I remind you that this survey will help to get the input about the self-assessment that the startups/SMEs made themselves regarding FIWARE usage. HOWEVER, the real assessment has to be performed by you, that is, you should complete the FIWARE usage assessment score card regarding projects within the Accelerator programme you coach. Please complete your assessment by Thursday, September 3 EOB. If you need help from FIWARE experts please let Stefano and myself know. On September 7th, Stefano and myself have been invited to attend a follow-up confcall with the EC and we should be able to report that the exercise is complete. I also remind you that you should provide the data of your assessment on the following shared spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Dijrn2gUsU0-dPhVqE9RXKi6MKkLnBVn_3YUEQWvCSs/edit?usp=sharing We may upload the results of the survey (self-assessment by the startups/SMEs on their projects) in the following, different, spreadsheet I have just created. Note that this has the same structure as the previous but we should place the name of the startup/SME instead of the name of the evaluator in column C: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1J8qACLN0MjuMIPY-XVdkhZbvGMPASA70IqxxLyNIg3s/edit?usp=sharing I hope that Franck will be able to configure a tool that would allow to automatically assign values in this second spreadsheet based on data gathered through the on-line survey. I copy Angeles and Pablo from Ogilvy who are monitoring collection of input regarding the business impact assessment, so that we all know where we are regarding the process of assessment. Cheers, -- Juanjo ______________________________________________________ Coordinator and Chief Architect, FIWARE platform CTO Industrial IoT, Telefónica email: juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com<mailto:juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com> twitter: @JuanjoHierro You can follow FIWARE at: website: http://www.fiware.org twitter: @FIWARE facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 24/08/15 23:13, Franck Le Gall wrote: Dear coaches, Here is the return rate((number of received answers compared to number of invitation sent, per accelerator) on the survey: NB % FABulous 2 4% FINODEX 6 13% FrontiesCities 9 32% INCENSe 1 7% FRACTALS 3 7% FI-ADOPT 3 9% SmartAgriFood 5 10% FInish 2 6% SOUL-FI 9 7% IMPACT 5 26% SpeedUp!Europe 16 20% EuropeanPioneers 3 25% CEED Tech 7 22% CREAtiFi 30 53% FI-C3 1 9% FICHe 3 15% TOTAL 105 16% Make sure to motivate your SMEs to answer. Silvio with Creatifi is the forerunner ;) Franck _______________________________________________ Fiware-coaches mailing list Fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org<mailto:Fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org> https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-coaches ________________________________ Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilización, divulgación y/o copia sin autorización puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislación vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción. The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete it. Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinatário, pode conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial e é para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se não é vossa senhoria o destinatário indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utilização, divulgação e/ou cópia sem autorização pode estar proibida em virtude da legislação vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destruição _______________________________________________ Fiware-coaches mailing list Fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org<mailto:Fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org> https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-coaches Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message, you should destroy this message. For more information on WPP's business ethical standards and corporate responsibility policies, please refer to WPP's website. [https://assets.ogilvy.com/truffles_email/wwit_signatures/canneslion-12-13-14-15.jpg] Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message, you should destroy this message. For more information on WPP's business ethical standards and corporate responsibility policies, please refer to WPP's website. ________________________________ Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilización, divulgación y/o copia sin autorización puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislación vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción. The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete it. Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinatário, pode conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial e é para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se não é vossa senhoria o destinatário indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utilização, divulgação e/ou cópia sem autorização pode estar proibida em virtude da legislação vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destruição Bu mesaj ve ekleri gönderilen kişiye özeldir ve gizli bilgiler içerebilir. Eğer mesajın gönderilmek istendiği kişi değilseniz lütfen kopyalamayınız, başkalarına göndermeyiniz ve göndericiyi bilgilendiriniz. Internet üzerinden gönderilen mesajların güvenli ve hatasız olduğunun garantisi olmadığından Atos grubu mesajın içeriğinden sorumlu tutulamaz. Göndericinin bilgisayarı anti-virüs sistemleri tarafından taranmaktadır, ancak yine de mesajın virüs içermediği garanti edilemez ve gönderici, meydana gelebilecek zararlardan sorumlu tutulamaz. This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavors to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "Chulani, Ilknur" <ilknur.chulani at atos.net<mailto:ilknur.chulani at atos.net>> To: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA <juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com<mailto:juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com>>, "fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org<mailto:fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org>" <fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org<mailto:fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org>> Cc: Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 09:23:49 +0000 Subject: Process on Accelerator success stories? Dear Juanjo and coaches, I started receiving requests from my accelerators regarding the evaluation of SMEs for the success stories. It seems the process followed is slightly different than what we discussed in the assessment survey telcos. With the assessment survey, we planned to evaluate all SMEs. Accelerators on the other hand seem to expect us to evaluate only the SMEs that are shortlisted in terms of business potential. I am attaching here the guidelines I found in the basecamp regarding the process accelerators are following and the template they have asked me to fill in for their shortlisted SMEs. Could you kindly clarify what is the exact expectation from the coaches regarding this? Do we really need to evaluate all SEs or just the short listed one? We need to know this in order to avoid duplicating work. Thanks in advance & kind regards, ilknur From: Bogdan.CEOBANU at ec.europa.eu<mailto:Bogdan.CEOBANU at ec.europa.eu> [mailto:Bogdan.CEOBANU at ec.europa.eu] Sent: 11 August 2015 11:03 To: gmaugis at images-et-reseaux.com<mailto:gmaugis at images-et-reseaux.com>; adrian.ferrero at fundingbox.com<mailto:adrian.ferrero at fundingbox.com>; satu.vainamo at cie.fi<mailto:satu.vainamo at cie.fi>; pelsmaeker at digitalezorg.nl<mailto:pelsmaeker at digitalezorg.nl>; sjaak.wolfert at wur.nl<mailto:sjaak.wolfert at wur.nl>; isobel.fletcher at ebn.eu<mailto:isobel.fletcher at ebn.eu>; oggemein at googlemail.com<mailto:oggemein at googlemail.com>; sundmaeker at atb-bremen.de<mailto:sundmaeker at atb-bremen.de>; chatzikostas at biosense.rs<mailto:chatzikostas at biosense.rs>; Jesus.Villasante at ec.europa.eu<mailto:Jesus.Villasante at ec.europa.eu>; grete at civitta.ee<mailto:grete at civitta.ee>; riivo.anton at civitta.ee<mailto:riivo.anton at civitta.ee>; sean at frontierservices.eu<mailto:sean at frontierservices.eu>; soulfi_contact at ipn.pt<mailto:soulfi_contact at ipn.pt>; Simona.Torre at buongiorno.com<mailto:Simona.Torre at buongiorno.com>; miguelgarcia at zabala.es<mailto:miguelgarcia at zabala.es>; BRodriguez at zabala.es<mailto:BRodriguez at zabala.es>; laura.kohler at etventure.com<mailto:laura.kohler at etventure.com>; christian.luedtke at etventure.com<mailto:christian.luedtke at etventure.com>; ingrid.willems at iminds.be<mailto:ingrid.willems at iminds.be>; BROECHLER Raimund; fbujan at carsa.es<mailto:fbujan at carsa.es>; Ragnar.Bergstrom at ec.europa.eu<mailto:Ragnar.Bergstrom at ec.europa.eu>; Peter.Fatelnig at ec.europa.eu<mailto:Peter.Fatelnig at ec.europa.eu>; Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu<mailto:Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu>; Maria-Concepcion.ANTON-GARCIA at ec.europa.eu<mailto:Maria-Concepcion.ANTON-GARCIA at ec.europa.eu>; isobel.fletcher at ebn.eu<mailto:isobel.fletcher at ebn.eu>; sean at frontierservices.eu<mailto:sean at frontierservices.eu>; miguelangel.comin at econet-consultants.com<mailto:miguelangel.comin at econet-consultants.com>; satu.vainamo at gmail.com<mailto:satu.vainamo at gmail.com>; bert.vermeer at wur.nl<mailto:bert.vermeer at wur.nl>; slourenco at ipn.pt<mailto:slourenco at ipn.pt>; krijn.poppe at wur.nl<mailto:krijn.poppe at wur.nl>; alex at peacefulfish.com<mailto:alex at peacefulfish.com>; ilkka.lakaniemi at aalto.fi<mailto:ilkka.lakaniemi at aalto.fi>; pentti.launonen at aalto.fi<mailto:pentti.launonen at aalto.fi>; susanne.kuehrer at skinterconsulting.eu<mailto:susanne.kuehrer at skinterconsulting.eu>; Cristian.OLIMID at ec.europa.eu<mailto:Cristian.OLIMID at ec.europa.eu>; belen.manchego at buongiorno.com<mailto:belen.manchego at buongiorno.com>; angeles.tejado at ogilvy.com<mailto:angeles.tejado at ogilvy.com>; pablo.honrubia at ogilvy.com<mailto:pablo.honrubia at ogilvy.com>; javier.garrido at enel.com<mailto:javier.garrido at enel.com>; sellares.gerard at gmail.com<mailto:sellares.gerard at gmail.com>; bernardita at frontierservices.eu<mailto:bernardita at frontierservices.eu>; Vanessa.VANHUMBEECK at ec.europa.eu<mailto:Vanessa.VANHUMBEECK at ec.europa.eu> Subject: RE: A16 FIWARE Accelerator Telco Monday 10 August 14:00 CET Dear Coordinators, Greatly appreciated for the commitment and energy that you have invested within this program. The first results are promising and together we can bring more value to the accelerator! Thanks to representatives from FIAdopt, Insense, FIC3, SoulFi, FICHE, FrontierCities, Creatifi, EuropeanPioneers - Sussane,Xavier, Satu, RaImund, Bernadita, Johnny and Laura for joining todays call. Topics discussed: 1. Business and technical aspects a. In order to prepare the communication campaign please prepare your answers for the section 1 and 2 regarding the best performing companies – in the appraisal form by 17 August: https://basecamp.com/2125738/projects/6480330/messages/45492831 The form will be submitted to the technical coach who will fill in the section 3 on the technical aspects. This analysis will be done as follow-up of the workshop in Paris and different types stories (videos, infographics, blogs, etc) will be made for the companies that showcase best business results & technological performance. Keep in mind that stories will be generated through the following 12 months so if any of you company encounter a major milestone (ie: get follow-up investment, sign a major partnership, reaches 100k downloads or similar, etc you might share this later with Ogilvy ). b. Juanjo (FICORE) will share with all the companies the following survey also to know how the companies are using the enablers: https://basecamp.com/2125738/projects/6480330/messages/45686754 This information collected by FICORE will be shared with the A16 and the EC in a "non-disclosure outside the programme" principle. The names of individual subgrantees will be anonymised. 2. Community Building Action Plan This planning was designed to increase the success level of the 770 companies in the program. It is based on concrete figures at vertical / geography level (https://www.dropbox.com/sh/6rm5klz48e48jed/AACfIA5yBO4g-dONoDMA3yI1a?dl=0) and builds on a set of best practices (https://basecamp.com/2125738/projects/6480330/messages/45239986) showcased within respected accelerators. The focus within the next 12 months will fall under the following aspects based on the geography/vertical aspects: - editorial (building on success stories) - online community (slack/basecamp – all 770 founders will invited ) - events (to bring additional value added to the companies in 3 ways: connections, education, marketing ) We should use at maximum the power of the network, the connections we have to increase the chances of success of the selected companies. This will raise the bar in terms of value added to the companies and will bring much more respect and reputation to your accelerator. In the next 12 months the companies you selected will be catapulted in the market in a very organic and systematic way, and we need your support for this. Each accelerator will lead events at vertical and geography level. In total there will be more than 45 of them. The draft planning at verticals/geography level (check the 3 tabs): https://www.dropbox.com/s/a53e5f5wirefu4m/2.communty-events.xlsx?dl=0 Next steps would be that leaders on verticals/geographies setup a skype/call and start preparing a plan of activities, including responsibilities, first events and ways how to bring as much value as possible to the participants. Results to be shared in Basecamp by the end of August. Practical examples of events: include facilitating meetings to key customers, access to the leading players in the industry, meetings with the key startup players in a particular geography, having vc's pitching to the startups, or teaching them about how to bring the companies to the next level. We will have a new phone call on 7 September (14:00) to discuss the evolution of these plans. For any questions don't hesitate to send us an email. Best regards, Bogdan on behalf of the Commission's FI team -----Original Appointment----- From: CEOBANU Bogdan (CNECT) Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2015 6:29 PM To: CEOBANU Bogdan (CNECT); 'Gaël MAUGIS'; 'adrian.ferrero at fundingbox.com<mailto:adrian.ferrero at fundingbox.com>'; 'satu.vainamo at cie.fi<mailto:satu.vainamo at cie.fi>'; 'Paul Pelsmaeker'; 'Sjaak Wolfert –'; 'Isobel Fletcher –'; 'Olaf-Gerd Gemein''; 'Harald Sundmaeker'; 'Grigoris Chatzikostas'; VILLASANTE Jesus (CNECT); 'Grete Gutmann'; 'riivo.anton at civitta.ee<mailto:riivo.anton at civitta.ee>'; ''sean at frontierservices.eu<mailto:sean at frontierservices.eu>'; ''Nuno Varandas'; 'Simona Torre'; 'miguelgarcia at zabala.es<mailto:miguelgarcia at zabala.es>'; 'Blanca Rodriguez'; 'European Pioneers Laura Kohler'; 'Christian Luedtke'; 'ingrid.willems at iminds.be<mailto:ingrid.willems at iminds.be>'; 'BROECHLER Raimund'; 'Francisco Buján'; BERGSTROM Ragnar (CNECT); FATELNIG Peter (CNECT); ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT); ANTON GARCIA Maria Concepcion (CNECT); 'isobel.fletcher at ebn.eu<mailto:isobel.fletcher at ebn.eu>'; 'sean at frontierservices.eu<mailto:sean at frontierservices.eu>'; 'miguelangel.comin at econet-consultants.com<mailto:miguelangel.comin at econet-consultants.com>'; 'Satu Väinämö'; Vermeer, Bert (bert.vermeer at wur.nl<mailto:bert.vermeer at wur.nl>); 'Susana Lourenço'; 'Krijn''; 'Alexander Berlin | peacefulfish'; 'Lakaniemi Ilkka'; 'Launonen Pentti'; Susanne Kuehrer (susanne.kuehrer at skinterconsulting.eu<mailto:susanne.kuehrer at skinterconsulting.eu>) (susanne.kuehrer at skinterconsulting.eu<mailto:susanne.kuehrer at skinterconsulting.eu>); OLIMID Cristian (CNECT); Maria Belen Manchego (belen.manchego at buongiorno.com<mailto:belen.manchego at buongiorno.com>); angeles.tejado at ogilvy.com<mailto:angeles.tejado at ogilvy.com>; Pablo Honrubia <pablo.honrubia at ogilvy.com<mailto:pablo.honrubia at ogilvy.com>> (pablo.honrubia at ogilvy.com<mailto:pablo.honrubia at ogilvy.com>); 'Garrido Chamorro, Javier' Cc: Gerard Sellarès; 'bernardita at frontierservices.eu<mailto:bernardita at frontierservices.eu>'; VANHUMBEECK Vanessa (CNECT) Subject: A16 FIWARE Accelerator Telco Monday 10 August 14:00 CET When: 10 August 2015 14:00-14:45 (UTC+01:00) Brussels, Copenhagen, Madrid, Paris. Where: +32 2 808 1363<tel:%2B32%202%20808%201363> Pin: 1329110 for international numbers: http://bit.ly/1qYC9iH Dear Coordinators, The coming three months will be critical for the success of the FIWARE accelerator. Since we want to ensure that your ideas and your initiatives get maximum priority, we would like to invite you to a 45’ phone call to exchange views about the next steps needed to ensure maximum results for the SME’s in the medium/long term. P Agenda: 1. Business and technical aspects: Please read Pablo's message: https://basecamp.com/2125738/projects/6480330/messages/45492831 and provide inputs on the Business criteria by 15 of August Juanjo will share with all the companies the following survey also: https://basecamp.com/2125738/projects/6480330/messages/45686754 2. Community Building Action Plan https://www.dropbox.com/sh/6rm5klz48e48jed/AACfIA5yBO4g-dONoDMA3yI1a?dl=0 Updated: Planning of events per verticals/geography in the next 12 months (check the 3 tabs): https://www.dropbox.com/s/a53e5f5wirefu4m/2.communty-events.xlsx?dl=0 3. Announcements from the Accelerator coordinators 4. Q&A Please accept the participation to this telco. If you are not available due to holidays please forward this invitation to your backup. The timing for the telco is: Monday 10 August from 14:00-14:45 CET. The connection details are the following: +32 2 808 1363<tel:%2B32%202%20808%201363> Pin: 1329110 for international numbers: http://bit.ly/1qYC9iH Best regards, Bogdan on behalf of the Commission's FI team ATOS WARNING ! This message contains attachments that could potentially harm your computer. Please make sure you open ONLY attachments from senders you know, trust and is in an e-mail that you are expecting. AVERTISSEMENT ATOS ! Ce message contient des pièces jointes qui peuvent potentiellement endommager votre ordinateur. Merci de vous assurer que vous ouvrez uniquement les pièces jointes provenant d’emails que vous attendez et dont vous connaissez les expéditeurs et leur faites confiance. AVISO DE ATOS ! Este mensaje contiene datos adjuntos que pudiera ser que dañaran su ordenador. Asegúrese de abrir SOLO datos adjuntos enviados desde remitentes de confianza y que procedan de un correo esperado. ATOS WARNUNG ! Diese E-Mail enthält Anlagen, welche möglicherweise ihren Computer beschädigen könnten. Bitte beachten Sie, daß Sie NUR Anlagen öffnen, von einem Absender den Sie kennen, vertrauen und vom dem Sie vor allem auch E-Mails mit Anlagen erwarten. _______________________________________________ Fiware-coaches mailing list Fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org<mailto:Fiware-coaches at lists.fi-ware.org> https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-coaches -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-coaches/attachments/20150901/4fcd8a03/attachment.html>
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy