Some question from CreatiFI accelerator

[Silvio Cretti]

Dear Juanjo, Stefano, coaches,
my Accelerator (CreatiFI) is going to close the second open call and is
asking me if from FIWARE we can provide any guidelines publicly shareable
in order to evaluate the best way to use FIWARE for an applicant.
Of course I can tell them to check out the development guides present on
the FIWARE website but I am wondering if we can help them a bit more
sharing the rationale behind the survey/scorecard we used to evaluate the
SMEs (I am thinking about the scores we assigned - ie the content of the
original google doc with the score for each answer)[1].
Can this be shared only among the accelerators? Also among the applicants?
Any other idea in order to help them?

The second question coming from them is related to FIWARE Lab: since the
second open call of CreatiFI is focused on moving the "prototypes" to the
market, they are asking me if they can push for the usage of FIWARE Lab
(that at the moment is for non-commercial usage only). Here I would like to
answer that soon new commercial nodes (thanks to the FIWARE Lab open call)
will join the Lab and then this shouldn't be a problem. In any case, also
in the current situation, they can encourage the usage of FIWARE Lab for
testing purposed in a pre-production/commercial environment.

What do you think?
Thanks in advance and best regards,
  silvio

[1] I recall that around one year ago we as coaches provided some
guidelines for evaluating the proposal of the first open call ("Principles
on evaluating FIWARE relevance for Phase 3 proposals"). What I am proposing
now is a quite similar thing (maybe more structured).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-coaches/attachments/20150915/91fc1804/attachment.html>