[Fiware-fiche-coaching] evaluation criteria FIWARE

[Franck Le Gall]

Dear Oscar,

Many thanks for your request.
Please find below the position we discussed within FIWARE and applicable for your step 1:

Step 1 (pre-proposal submission or initial proposals screening)
This step is characterised by the fact proposers provide very few/draft details. Also the time to analyse each of the proposals will be kept minimum.

Evaluation criteria:
1.No enablers used > disqualified

2.One enabler used > acceptable but this must be strongly documented
2.1 The GE must be tightly integrated with the solution of the company, i.e should implement a new functionality which is clearly value add for the company business. If not, i.e. the functionality is there just to take money from FIWARE, the proposal is disqualified
2.2 In addition, justification of why adding this GE rather than 3^rd party solutions should be provided

3.Several GEIs used > acceptable and recommended
3.1 the proposal shall provide a draft architecture of the proposed solution showing clearly interactions between the various GEIs and eventually third party or owned software.
3.2 Use of several disconnected enablers is possible. Then each should be justified as for case 2 above
3.3 Preferred solution is the use of several integrated enablers.

4. Application hosted by the FIWARE Cloud -> acceptable and recommended
4.1 SMEs should make use of this cloud, meaning that they host their application in the cloud while at the same time using a number of GEs which are hosted in the cloud too (or are deployed somewhere locally, e.g. in the case of IoT/Sensors/Gateways).
4.2 The only deployment of the application in the FIWARE Cloud is disqualified
More detailed evaluation will have to take place in the 2nd step of your process.
Kind regards
Franck

De : fiware-fiche-coaching-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [mailto:fiware-fiche-coaching-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] De la part de Oscar van Dijk | Dutch eHealth Fund Management B.V.
Envoyé : mardi 21 octobre 2014 22:09
À : fiware-fiche-coaching at lists.fi-ware.org
Objet : [Fiware-fiche-coaching] evaluation criteria FIWARE

Dear Franck (le GALL)

I am (amongst others) responsible for overseeing which criteria need to be used for the "use of FIWARE" assessment within applications for FICHe accelerator. Can you please give use some guidance on the topic of general criteria that may be used within all accelerators.

Thank you
Oscar van Dijk
________________________________


[cid:image001.gif at 01CFED82.26B80800]

[cid:part2.02090604.02080203 at deh-fundmanagement.eu]





Kooltjesbuurt 9
1411 RZ Naarden
+31(0)619194999

website<http://www.deh-fund.nl> |  e-mail<mailto:oscar.van.dijk at deh-fund.nl>

[cid:part6.06090807.08040705 at deh-fundmanagement.eu]<http://www.linkedin.com/company/3214389?trk=tyah>


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-fiche-coaching/attachments/20141021/424eab7e/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 7772 bytes
Desc: image001.gif
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-fiche-coaching/attachments/20141021/424eab7e/attachment.gif>