In addition Nuria de Lama wanted to discuss some activities ATOS could perform in the Foundation concerning this proposal. I suggest you keep in touch for this matter. I will add you to the proposal in the EC system, but I need confirmation on the contact to use for the portal. Is it you Juanjo? In addition information for some parts of the proposal related to dissemination/exploitation and contribution to some sections should be provided. Can I count on you for the duties? Regards, Fede El 05/04/2016 a las 9:45, Jacques Magen (InterInnov) escribió: > Dear Juanjo, > > The Foundation is integrated into the proposal, almost exclusively on > communication activities, as you requested. Pierre-Yves and Stefano > are part of the proposal as well as Luis Ignacio and Estan for TID as > you know. Fede will register formally the Foundation as a partner with > the EC tool. We will update the monthly rate in our budget sheet > (currently the budget for the Foundation is around 200 K€). > > Please send me asap a description of the activities of the FIWARE > Press Office. I will send you later today the description we have put > for the Foundation in section4-5 for finalisation. > > Thank you and best regards, > > Jacques > > -- > > Jacques Magen > > *jmagen at interinnov.eu* > > Tel.: +33 9 81 03 98 49 / +33 7 60 46 50 23 > > www.interinnov.eu > > Twitter: @interinnov_eu <http://twitter.com/interinnov_eu> > > Skype: jacques.magen > > Le 05/04/2016 07:09, Juanjo Hierro a écrit : >> Dear Federico, >> >> Any news on this matter ? >> >> Finally we got the PIC number for the FIWARE Foundation: 919308965 >> >> For the direct costs per PM, you may consider 7000 € >> >> We can provide a description of the activities of the FIWARE Press >> Office. >> >> Note: For your convenience and regarding matters about integration >> of the FIWARE Foundation in the proposal, you can contact any of the >> following contacts of the FIWARE Foundation Founder companies. You >> can also use the fiware-foundation-info at lists.fiware.org mailing >> list, which can work as kind of help-desk for requesting any info or >> assistance: >> >> * Nuria De-Lama <nuria.delama at atos.net> (Atos) >> * Stefano De Panfilis <Stefano.DePanfilis at eng.it> (Engineering) >> * Pierre Yves Danet <pierreyves.danet at orange.com> (Orange) >> * Juanjo Hierro <juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com> (Telefónica) >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> -- Juanjo >> ______________________________________________________ >> >> Coordinator and Chief Architect, FIWARE platform >> IoT Unit, Telefónica >> >> email:juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com >> twitter: @JuanjoHierro >> >> You can follow FIWARE at: >> website:http://www.fiware.org >> twitter: @FIWARE >> facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 >> linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 >> On 24/03/16 13:46, Juanjo Hierro wrote: >>> >>> On 24/03/16 13:16, Jacques Magen (InterInnov) wrote: >>>> Dear Juanjo, >>>> >>>> Thank you for the very good explanation which helps me/us >>>> understand the whole picture better. I just discussed with Fede and >>>> we agree on the following: >>>> >>>> - We take the Foundation on board, and we give them the >>>> responsibility for promotion and communication activities, and we >>>> will also include the Foundation in the management activities for >>>> the interaction with the other projects and bodies. Please send >>>> Fede the PIC number as soon as it is available (if not yet). Also >>>> who is the contact person and the resources that will be in the >>>> Foundation and that will be mentioned in the proposal? It cannot be >>>> you and any of us, it should be dedicated personnel. Please think >>>> about this and let us know how to proceed in this respect. I had a >>>> similar issue with the 5G Infrastructure Association, I can check >>>> how we did it and we could follow the same path maybe -I will look >>>> into that -except if you have another idea, then let me know. >>>> For the budget let's see where we stand next week, we are currently >>>> finalizing all WPs and Tasks and the various sections of the >>>> proposal and we will come up with a first provisional budget shortly. >>> >>> Ok. Sounds good. I don't have a strong position regarding how to >>> handle the matter on contact person and resources, so happy to learn >>> how you has handled it related to the 5G infrastructure >>> association. Let's discuss the details about budget next week. >>> >>>> >>>> - We understand your concern about the coverage of all issues in >>>> the bullet point that we are addressing, but actually when reading >>>> the call text for this topic we will be addressing all aspects, >>>> from the international perspective. We assume that the iHubs >>>> proposal will also address all aspects, from a European >>>> perspective. In this sense merging would only lose the focus of >>>> each of the proposals. If you tell us who is coordinating the iHubs >>>> proposal we can coordinate with them and make sure we have >>>> complementary activities, but we consider that merging is not a >>>> good solution at this stage. >>> >>> Ok. If you believe you are safe, I don't complain. I understand >>> that it would be difficult to merge. My concern was more that both >>> get disqualified because none were presenting a complete proposal, >>> but if you feel safe, that's fine. >>> >>> What it is important is that combining the two proposals you don't >>> go higher than 3 M€ ... I'm talking to people coordinating the >>> proposal from iHubs so I guess it should not be difficult to >>> coordinate on that. >>> >>>> >>>> Thank you again and let's hope we will all have at the end the best >>>> possible projects that will be nicely coordinating with each other. >>> >>> Thanks to you. Cheers, >>> >>> -- Juanjo >>> >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> >>>> Jacques >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> Jacques Magen >>>> >>>> *jmagen at interinnov.eu* >>>> >>>> Tel.: +33 9 81 03 98 49 / +33 7 60 46 50 23 >>>> >>>> www.interinnov.eu >>>> >>>> Twitter: @interinnov_eu <http://twitter.com/interinnov_eu> >>>> >>>> Skype: jacques.magen >>>> >>>> Le 24/03/2016 00:58, Juanjo Hierro a écrit : >>>>> >>>>> On 22/03/16 14:48, Jacques Magen (InterInnov) wrote: >>>>>> Dear Juanjo, >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you for your email. Indeed I am coordinating a proposal for >>>>>> ICT12a.ii (12.b is the RIA) that UPM (Fede in cc) will >>>>>> coordinate, as is the case for the current FI-LINKS project where >>>>>> I am leading the international activities but where Fede is the >>>>>> overall coordinator. >>>>>> >>>>>> We are grateful for your support to FIWARE Mundus and to a >>>>>> continuation of our activities. You are raising three important >>>>>> issues i.e. 1) the coordination among ICT12a proposals, 2) the >>>>>> participation of the FIWARE Foundation, and 3) the communication >>>>>> activities. >>>>>> >>>>>> _1) Coordination among ICT12a proposals_ >>>>>> >>>>>> As you can imagine, we discussed several times with the EC about >>>>>> our proposal. They made it very clear that they want proposals >>>>>> focusing on one bullet point (in our case 12a.ii), that they want >>>>>> from us a proposal focusing on international activities, and that >>>>>> they are expecting another proposal on European regional >>>>>> activities from iHubs. They also clearly told us that the budget >>>>>> for each proposal shall not be more than 1.2 M€, as they are >>>>>> planning to accept between 2 and 4 proposals addressing 12a.ii. >>>>>> In this sense we do agree that the two proposals shall not have a >>>>>> total budget beyond 3 M€, we will be targeting between 1.2 and >>>>>> 1.5 on our side and we expect the iHubs proposal to do the same. >>>>>> >>>>>> Merging with the iHubs proposal would be contradictory to this >>>>>> feedback that we have got. Besides, we believe that there is a >>>>>> risk that such a merged proposal would lose the focus that is >>>>>> required. So at this stage we are hesitant about your suggestion, >>>>>> also because there is less than one month before the deadline and >>>>>> our proposal is already quite advanced and would need to be >>>>>> completely reshaped probably -not to mention adding new partners. >>>>> >>>>> I have had some informal conversations with the EC this week. >>>>> Last one yesterday. >>>>> >>>>> They told me they are looking for proposals that cover each of >>>>> the 4 goals within ICT-12.a in its full extend. That's why I see >>>>> some risk. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> However coordination between projects is indeed very important. >>>>>> In our understanding, there is a project that will support the >>>>>> FIWARE Foundation that should address ICT12.a.iii. and this >>>>>> project should take care of the coordination between the various >>>>>> ICT12a projects. We are fully ready to take a small part in this >>>>>> project i.e. UPM and InterInnov on the FIWARE Mundus chapter, in >>>>>> order to make sure that FIWARE Mundus keeps a consistent approach >>>>>> and is fully in line with the priorities of the Foundation (while >>>>>> we would also contribute to those priorities at international >>>>>> level). We think that involving someone from iHubs would also be >>>>>> good to take care of the European regional chapter -and probably >>>>>> the same for the accelerators. >>>>> >>>>> You seem to have a wrong assumption regarding ICT-12.a.iii. >>>>> ICT-12.a.iii is not about funding the FIWARE Foundation or about >>>>> activities of the FIWARE Foundation. Please read the text call >>>>> and you will immediately realize that. >>>>> >>>>> On the other hand, goals ii to iv under ICT-12.a have to do with >>>>> supporting activities that would be carried out by members of the >>>>> FIWARE Community. They map rather nicely, and would help to give >>>>> continuity, to activities linked to the 5 pillar programmes of the >>>>> FIWARE initative defined in https://www.fiware.org/about-us/. >>>>> Actually: >>>>> >>>>> * Continuity of FIWARE and FIWARE Lab activities would be >>>>> supported in ICT-12.a.iii >>>>> * Continuity of the FIWARE Mundus and FIWARE iHub programmes >>>>> activities would be supported in ICT-12.a.ii >>>>> * Continuity of the FIWARE Accelerator programme activities >>>>> would be supported in ICT-12.a.iv >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The FIWARE Foundation, on the other hand, is aimed at supporting >>>>> activities of the FIWARE Community, therefore activities linked to >>>>> the 5 mentioned pillars. The necessary funding to cover >>>>> resources of the Foundation to get involved and therefore ensure >>>>> proper support and coordination of activities in the 5 pillars >>>>> should naturally come from projects funded linked to the >>>>> ICT-12.ii-iv objectives and not just ICT-12.iii >>>>> >>>>> It's time now for those who believe in the FIWARE initiative and >>>>> lead activities linked to the five pillars of FIWARE to take >>>>> responsibility and contribute to the sustainability of the FIWARE >>>>> Foundation. Because of that, we are recommending submitters of >>>>> proposals to the different subcalls to incorporate resources >>>>> within their projects to be assigned to the FIWARE Foundation as a >>>>> partner. Such resources should cover the corresponding >>>>> involvement of the Press Office in the different programmes >>>>> (FIWARE, FIWARE Lab, FIWARE iHub, FIWARE Mundus, FIWARE >>>>> Accelerator programmes). Devoting the funding of 1 FTE/year to >>>>> the FIWARE Foundation for coordination purposes as well as 10% of >>>>> the overall funding to FIWARE Press Office activities seem like a >>>>> reasonable approach). I can tell you that we plan to give away >>>>> more resources within the proposal that we will submit to >>>>> ICT-12.a.iii, but the rest of proposals should approach this >>>>> figures IMHO. >>>>> >>>>> Again, based on informal conversations hold with the EC, I feel >>>>> that they will welcome proposals submitted to each of the the >>>>> ICT-12.a goals that incorporate resources assigned to the FIWARE >>>>> Foundation. You can contact Jesus, Peter, Ragnar or Arian to >>>>> double-check. >>>>> >>>>> I believe, on the other hand, that proposals that will bring the >>>>> FIWARE Foundation on board will have higher chances to succeed. >>>>> Of course, this is my personal opinion. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Then at proposal stage even if we do not merge there is the >>>>>> possibility to interact among proposals and make sure we are not >>>>>> overlapping. This may be a more feasible solution -I mean between >>>>>> the ICT12a.ii proposals from FIWARE Mundus and iHubs, and the >>>>>> ICT12a.iii proposal. >>>>> >>>>> As explained, the more urgent/critical matter is that of >>>>> incorporating resources of the FIWARE Foundation in the >>>>> proposal. Merging might look difficult, you simply have to >>>>> balance the risk of not doing so. I have been told by the EC that >>>>> proposals targeted to each of the ICT-12.a.x goals will be >>>>> evaluated against all objectives of the targeted ICT-12.a.x >>>>> goal. In other words, they have to be "complete". If the EC >>>>> coach the evaluators in that direction, then you are incurring >>>>> into a serious risk. >>>>> >>>>> I would kindly suggest that you contact the EC regarding the two >>>>> points: about completeness of proposals and the fact that the EC >>>>> will welcome that proposals incorporate resources assigned to the >>>>> FIWARE Foundation (including Press Office activities). This way >>>>> you will get feedback directly. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _2) Participation of the FIWARE Foundation__ >>>>>> _ >>>>>> Making the FIWARE Foundation a partner in the proposal is >>>>>> definitely welcome. At this stage as you know there are 5 >>>>>> partners in the proposal: UPM, InterInnov, TID, Engineering and >>>>>> ATOS. As you can see there are three of the four founding members >>>>>> of the Foundation. If the Foundation was to appear as such in the >>>>>> proposal, then it should be replacing some of the activities >>>>>> currently planned for TID, Engineering or Orange, not in addition >>>>>> to those. This way it would be clear that there is a tight >>>>>> integration between the Foundation and the activities planned in >>>>>> the project, and no overlap with what TID, Engineering and Orange >>>>>> would do on their own. >>>>> >>>>> I'm not famliar with the details of the activities assigned to >>>>> TID, Engineering, Orange or Atos. i don't believe that they will >>>>> run any activity that could be assumed by the Press Office. The >>>>> rest of resources we recommend to assign to the FIWARE Foundation >>>>> are more for coordination purposes. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _3) Communication activities__ >>>>>> _ >>>>>> Considering the tight budget, we have decided indeed to cut into >>>>>> the communication and promotion activities and relate on other >>>>>> ICT12 project that should do that. I do not know yet how much the >>>>>> communication activities will cost in our project but our intent >>>>>> is indeed to keep them in line with what we believe we can do and >>>>>> focus on international events and promotional activities. In this >>>>>> sense. We are planning to have a kind of a global FIWARE >>>>>> Programme a little bit similar to GCTC to encourage the >>>>>> development of FIWARE-based solutions all over the world, in this >>>>>> sense I believe that the budget dedicated to this will probably >>>>>> in line with the 200-300 K€ you are mentioning, maybe even more,. >>>>>> However going for a broader presence and sponsoring of events may >>>>>> once again make us lose the focus while once again there should >>>>>> be a FIWARE Foundation support proposal including also the >>>>>> current activities of the FIWARE Press Office that should be >>>>>> doing that. >>>>>> Now I am not really sure I understand why the Foundation would >>>>>> take care of those activities. For me as mentioned in 2 this is >>>>>> part of the proposal under ICT12.a.iii not ours, and then the >>>>>> Foundation should manage the Press Office indeed. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Again your assumption that there should be a single proposal >>>>> taking care of the FIWARE Foundation support, assuming all the >>>>> costs covering coordination/support activities or activities of >>>>> the FIWARE Press Office with regards to each of the FIWARE pillars >>>>> (FIWARE Platform, FIWARE Lab, FIWARE Mundus, FIWARE iHubs, FIWARE >>>>> Accelerator) is wrong. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> As you know I am in Washington D.C. this week at the GCTC Tech >>>>>> Jam, but if you want to talk on the phone with Fede about this >>>>>> feel free to do that. I trust that Fede and you will find the >>>>>> right way to proceed on all those three important issues. I shall >>>>>> be back in the office only next Monday (maybe Friday afternoon >>>>>> but not for sure). Probably the first thing we we want to do is >>>>>> check this once again with the EC, although at first we are >>>>>> rather hesitant as we are not sure it will actually increase our >>>>>> chances and will for sure make the next weeks more challenging. >>>>> >>>>> Ok. I'll talk to Fede. I hope that despite it's holidays he >>>>> will ready to talk :-) >>>>> >>>>> Best regards, >>>>> >>>>> -- Juanjo >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>> >>>>>> Jacques >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> >>>>>> Jacques Magen >>>>>> >>>>>> *jmagen at interinnov.eu* >>>>>> >>>>>> Tel.: +33 9 81 03 98 49 / +33 7 60 46 50 23 >>>>>> >>>>>> www.interinnov.eu >>>>>> >>>>>> Twitter: @interinnov_eu <http://twitter.com/interinnov_eu> >>>>>> >>>>>> Skype: jacques.magen >>>>>> >>>>>> Le 22/03/2016 14:01, Juanjo Hierro a écrit : >>>>>>> Hi Jacques, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Any feedback about my previous mail below? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have a conversation with Jesus today and he has told me that an >>>>>>> actual requirement that will be evaluated on any proposal would >>>>>>> be that >>>>>>> of covering ALL aspects of the corresponding goal ... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I see now more clearly the need of merge between the two current >>>>>>> ongoing proposals. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Of course, the matter about incorporation of the Foundation as >>>>>>> partner, taking care of communication activities (therefore >>>>>>> carrying out >>>>>>> proper coordination with the Press Office) is also rather relevant. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- Juanjo >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ______________________________________________________ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Coordinator and Chief Architect, FIWARE platform >>>>>>> CTO Industrial IoT, Telefónica >>>>>>> >>>>>>> email: juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com >>>>>>> twitter: @JuanjoHierro >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You can follow FIWARE at: >>>>>>> website: http://www.fiware.org >>>>>>> twitter: @FIWARE >>>>>>> facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 >>>>>>> linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 20/03/16 20:02, Juanjo Hierro wrote: >>>>>>>> Dear Jacques, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I hope you are doing well. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Based on conversations hold with Luis Ignacio, I understand >>>>>>>> that you >>>>>>>> are leading the preparation of a proposal to the ICT-12.b call >>>>>>>> on the >>>>>>>> topic of "FIWARE ecosystem creation", trying to give continuity to >>>>>>>> activities under the FIWARE mundus programme. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This looks very fine. You know that I'm the first who has >>>>>>>> advocated >>>>>>>> for FIWARE mundus to work as a stable programme and describe it >>>>>>>> as a >>>>>>>> pillar of the FIWARE initiative in all official documents >>>>>>>> describing >>>>>>>> the FIWARE initiative. Therefore, I certainly support the >>>>>>>> idea of >>>>>>>> FIWARE mundus activities being funded under ICT-12 Innovation >>>>>>>> Actions. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I guess you know that relevant partners behind the FIWARE iHubs >>>>>>>> programme are, on the other hand, also preparing a proposal to >>>>>>>> ICT-12.b. It is true that such proposal would not overlap with >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> one focused on FIWARE mundus. After all, the FIWARE mundus and >>>>>>>> FIWARE iHubs programme were defined to be complementary with >>>>>>>> not that >>>>>>>> much overlapping. However, I'm concerned that the two >>>>>>>> proposals, if >>>>>>>> presented separately, reduce their chances to be selected >>>>>>>> against any >>>>>>>> other proposal that may be submitted to the same objective with >>>>>>>> a more >>>>>>>> holistic approach (i.e., covering all aspects regarding FIWARE >>>>>>>> ecosystem creation). This might be very well the case because >>>>>>>> each of >>>>>>>> the two will not address the whole objective (objective ii) >>>>>>>> while a >>>>>>>> third may go for addressing it all ... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I would like to propose that the two proposals merge in only one >>>>>>>> which can be evaluated as completely addressing the targeted >>>>>>>> objective. I can help in achieving such merge. By merging >>>>>>>> the two >>>>>>>> proposals, we believe that there will be more chances to >>>>>>>> succeed and >>>>>>>> synergies can be put in place. In this respect, we believe >>>>>>>> that a >>>>>>>> proposal derived from such merge should not be requesting more >>>>>>>> than >>>>>>>> 2,5-3 M€ (3 M€ would be absolutely maximum). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In addition to this, and in any case, I would like to >>>>>>>> encourage you >>>>>>>> to incorporate participation of the FIWARE foundation as partner. >>>>>>>> This would be feasible since the FIWARE Foundation founders (Atos, >>>>>>>> Engineering, Orange and Telefónica) have agreed to obtain a PIC >>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>> the FIWARE foundation which would allow it to join as partner >>>>>>>> despite >>>>>>>> not yet created (this option was actually double-checked with the >>>>>>>> EC). One benefit of it is that this would allow communication >>>>>>>> activities to be subcontracted by the Foundation, which as >>>>>>>> non-profit >>>>>>>> organization would get 100% funded. We would also encourage >>>>>>>> you that >>>>>>>> an effort of at least 200-300 K€ of the funding is booked for >>>>>>>> communication activities as part of FIWARE Mundus activities. >>>>>>>> That >>>>>>>> would allow to be present as sponsor, and produce all the >>>>>>>> necessary >>>>>>>> material as well as the design of a visible booth, in relevant >>>>>>>> events. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What are your thoughts? Should we work for the merge? Would >>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>> agree with incorporation of the FIWARE Foundation and the >>>>>>>> assignment >>>>>>>> of budget/funding to it dealing with communication activities? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- Juanjo >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ______________________________________________________ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Coordinator and Chief Architect, FIWARE platform >>>>>>>> CTO Industrial IoT, Telefónica >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> email: juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com >>>>>>>> twitter: @JuanjoHierro >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You can follow FIWARE at: >>>>>>>> website: http://www.fiware.org >>>>>>>> twitter: @FIWARE >>>>>>>> facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 >>>>>>>> linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ________________________________ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su >>>>>>> destinatario, puede contener información privilegiada o >>>>>>> confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la persona o entidad de >>>>>>> destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda >>>>>>> notificado de que la lectura, utilización, divulgación y/o copia >>>>>>> sin autorización puede estar prohibida en virtud de la >>>>>>> legislación vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le >>>>>>> rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y >>>>>>> proceda a su destrucción. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The information contained in this transmission is privileged and >>>>>>> confidential information intended only for the use of the >>>>>>> individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message >>>>>>> is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any >>>>>>> dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is >>>>>>> strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in >>>>>>> error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender >>>>>>> that you have received this communication in error and then >>>>>>> delete it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu >>>>>>> destinatário, pode conter informação privilegiada ou >>>>>>> confidencial e é para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de >>>>>>> destino. Se não é vossa senhoria o destinatário indicado, fica >>>>>>> notificado de que a leitura, utilização, divulgação e/ou cópia >>>>>>> sem autorização pode estar proibida em virtude da legislação >>>>>>> vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos >>>>>>> o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua >>>>>>> destruição >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su >>>>> destinatario, puede contener información privilegiada o >>>>> confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la persona o entidad de >>>>> destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda >>>>> notificado de que la lectura, utilización, divulgación y/o copia >>>>> sin autorización puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislación >>>>> vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos >>>>> lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su >>>>> destrucción. >>>>> >>>>> The information contained in this transmission is privileged and >>>>> confidential information intended only for the use of the >>>>> individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is >>>>> not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any >>>>> dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is >>>>> strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in >>>>> error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that >>>>> you have received this communication in error and then delete it. >>>>> >>>>> Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu >>>>> destinatário, pode conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial >>>>> e é para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se não é >>>>> vossa senhoria o destinatário indicado, fica notificado de que a >>>>> leitura, utilização, divulgação e/ou cópia sem autorização pode >>>>> estar proibida em virtude da legislação vigente. Se recebeu esta >>>>> mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente >>>>> por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destruição >>>> >>> >>> . >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su >> destinatario, puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial >> y es para uso exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es >> usted. el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, >> utilización, divulgación y/o copia sin autorización puede estar >> prohibida en virtud de la legislación vigente. Si ha recibido este >> mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por >> esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción. >> >> The information contained in this transmission is privileged and >> confidential information intended only for the use of the individual >> or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the >> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, >> distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. >> If you have received this transmission in error, do not read it. >> Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this >> communication in error and then delete it. >> >> Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu >> destinatário, pode conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial e é >> para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se não é vossa >> senhoria o destinatário indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, >> utilização, divulgação e/ou cópia sem autorização pode estar proibida >> em virtude da legislação vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, >> rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e >> proceda a sua destruição > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-foundation-info/attachments/20160405/21465d52/attachment.html>
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy