From jhierro at tid.es Mon Dec 16 13:06:27 2013 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 13:06:27 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-ga] Fwd: IMPORTANT: Amendment 6 of FI-WARE DoW In-Reply-To: <52AEE057.4040209@tid.es> References: <52AEE057.4040209@tid.es> Message-ID: <52AEECC3.6090801@tid.es> Hi, You may receive this email twice, but just in case ... Cheers, -- Juanjo -------- Original Message -------- Subject: IMPORTANT: Amendment 6 of FI-WARE DoW Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 12:13:27 +0100 From: Juanjo Hierro To: fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu CC: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu , fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Dear all, We have just closed a first consolidated draft of amendment 6 of the FI-WARE DoW. You can download it from: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3237/FI-WARE-DoW-Amendment6-DRAFT+v2.docx The changes that this new version comprises are summarized as follows: 1. Update of the logo. 2. Change in the names of two of the existing partners (FT and NSN-H). 3. Incorporation of Startup Weekend (this was a beneficiary from the third Open Call whose incorporation was delayed until their Legal and Finantial validation was closed) 4. Incorporation of new beneficiaries that will work in the connection of a number of cities to FI-Lab (M?laga. Sevilla, Santander, Trento). Their activities will be become part of a new task10.7. 5. Changes of efforts of Engineering (E-IIS) from WP3 to WP9. 6. Transfer of some of the efforts from Intel in WP4 to both IBM-IL and UPM. 7. A new third party from DT. 8. Extension of the project to month 40th. This has not yet approved by the consortia but a voting will be carried out his week and I don't expect major issues. The 2 first points are simply cosmetic, so we understand that they won't bring any issue. Point 3 means to close the pending action of adding the last beneficiary (Startup Weekend) of Open Call 3 and we have to add them to comply with the results of the Open Call to which we are bound by contract. Bear in mind that Startup Weekend were in the list of beneficiaries of Open Call 3, and nobody objected to their addition as beneficiaries (the same way nobody objected about the rest). We believe their involvement at this moment can bring a significant push on awareness about FI-WARE within the community of entrepreneurs and startups given their very good reputation. Point 4 is the result of executing the decision to devote some funding to the connection of cities to FI-Lab, as already agreed long time ago and captured in amendment 5 of the DoW. Points 5 to 7 only impact the partners involved and I guess won't mean any issue to any other partner. Therefore, we will consider that you agree with the contents of the amendment regarding points 1-7 unless we hear any objection before Wednesday EOB. Regarding point 8, we will carry out a voting on doodle to determine whether we finally go for the extension or not, now that we got answers to questions formulated to our PO regarding the implications. The changes associated to this point will be removed or kept depending on the results of this voting. The draft of the amendment includes them so that you can better measure the implications of those changes. Don't hesitate to formulate any question you may have. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Dec 16 13:29:38 2013 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 13:29:38 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-ga] IMPORTANT VOTE: FI-WARE Project extension In-Reply-To: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D07713571@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> References: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D07713571@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> Message-ID: <52AEF232.2040709@tid.es> Hi all, We need to carry out a final voting about whether to extend or not the FI-WARE project. For this purpose, I have setup the following doodle poll. You have to cast what of the different statements in the columns better reflect your position before Wednesday EOB: http://doodle.com/3qk3rn5afh6vne39 Essentially you can choose between three options: * OPTION 1: I can live with the extension provided that deliverables are delayed 4 months. * OPTION 2: I can live with the extension provided that I can finish my contributions to deliverables as originally planned so no significant contributions are expected from us after month 36 other than the support described in the FI-PPP Collaboration Agreement. My coordination role will be taken over by other after month 36. * I object to any kind of extension Note that extension of the duration of the project will not be accompanied by any extension of the funding. We have discussed this issue extensively, so we believe that the deadline is not so tight. Attached below, you can find the email that our PO, Arian Zweggers, regarding responses to a number of considerations about extension of the project. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: FI-WARE Project extension Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 16:46:50 +0000 From: To: CC: Dear Juanjo, 1) This will depend largely on the outcome of the Dec 18 review. The whole purpose is to direct efforts to parts which will/do contribute to the ultimate success of the PPP, and to move FI-WARE into FI-PPP phase 3 mode. I'm not a fortune teller, but ? based on the previous review report and other indications ? I could imagine the following: ? Support, dissemination, and training will indeed be essential, as well as cooperation with XIFI, expansion, sustainability, and hand-over to the TFE project. ? Certain GEi developments will be stopped. Some of them might be started again, but in a different fashion and with a different owner, or using a competition approach. ? GERIs/GEis should be properly packaged and made publicly available, including documentation, manuals, videos, tutorials, etc. Focus on supportive materials, focus on making GE implementations usable. ? GE REFERENCE implementations, and not just GEis, should be developed. We need to move towards true reference implementations of open specifications. Appropriate processes need to be put in place for third parties to comment on and influence the specifications, and for third parties to cross-reference a GERI and its GE specification. The GERIs should document how the specification was interpreted via implementation decisions. ? Related to the point above, GE validation, including redress, by third parties (incl phase 2 projects) need proper processes and mechanisms (see page 4, review report). ? In addition, mechanisms need to be put in place for truly OPEN (and not just public) specifications (see page 5 review report) ? Prioritisation of GEs (see review report page 5) and consequences. This should be presented at the review meeting on Dec 18. ? Clarity on status: cockpit, Catalogue Testbed, FI-LAB, GE + GEi status and planning was and is still unclear. The cockpit is not up-to-date, partners start developing "components", "optional extensions" (what are those?), etc. It is impossible to get a good overview. ? Continuation of exploitation activities including clarification of T&Cs. ? Increased focus in year 3 on dissemination, contests, Startup Weekends, etc. This should be presented in the review meeting. ? Expansion towards smart cities and internationally: what is planned and what can be achieved at the end of the project? Also to be presented at the review meeting. ? Increasing support to phase 2 projects and third parties, where needed 2) For the majority of the work in a specific GE, yes. But I understand GE specifications and implementations are living artefacts. Therefore, it would seem logical to me that support, modifications based on feedback, etc continue until the end of the project. It cannot be that feedback from use case projects is ignored because it came at month 34. 3) That does not make sense to me. It should be month 40. Of course, if partners think they can have their contribution at month 36, they can obviously send it to the WP leader at month 36. 4) Yes 5) Yes Best regards, Arian. From: Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] Sent: Saturday, November 02, 2013 1:39 PM To: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Cc: jhierro >> "Juan J. Hierro" Subject: FI-WARE Project extension Dear Arian, As already commented to Jesus and you, we have opened a thread of discussion within FI-WARE about an extension of 4 months to the project in line with the recommendation given in the last review report. In order to give a definitive answer, some partners are asking for some elaborated answer to the following questions: 1. What kind of activities are foreseen during the extended period ? Would they only be related to support, dissemination and training ? 2. Will a given FI-WARE GEi owner be able to chose between a) closing its contribution to FI-WARE GE Open Specifications and its FI-WARE GEi development activities as already planned in the DoW (i.e., delivering updated GE Open Specifications as well as GEi software, testing plans and related documentation in month 33, that is end of January) or b) delay them to be in month 36 ? Ability to choose would be certainly useful, because some GEi owners can adapt to the extension provided that a delay in deliverables is approved, while others can live with the extension but provided that they can close their activities in the dates originally planned in the DoW. Telefonica, as coordinator, doesn't see any problem allowing a partner to close its activities as planned in the DoW. Just to avoid any burden we most probably would submit all the mentioned deliverables in month 36 (despite some partners would submit them internally at month 33) 3. Could month 36 be preserved as the date for submission of deliverables in WP11 (exploitation) ? 4. Could month 40 be defined as the date for submission of deliverables linked to WP12 (communication, collaboration and dissemination) ? 5. Can partners assuming a WPL or WPA role discontinue that role in month 36 if another partner is ready to take over their role until the end of the project ? Could you please answer these questions ? This and any other information that may be helpful to understand what the extension will mean in terms of workload would be certainly helpful to reach an agreement within the consortia as we would love to during this upcoming week. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: