Hi all, I provided the input to the wiki page. Please find the consolidated version under the following link: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/FIWARE.ArchitectureDescription.Identity_Management_Generic_Enabler Please have a look specially at chapter 6, if I was transferring your input in the right way. @all: If someone has an idea how to limit the length of the tables, please tell me. I was not able to put them in a better shape due to missing wiki commands. So if someone is more experienced here, please feel free to step in. @Pascal: As agreed I kept the description of the standard example code (e.g. for SAML, OAuth, ..). I can replace it via a link if needed. @all: I separated the interface description in chapter 6 by the company names. I remember that Juanjo requested to remove the names. Did someone has an idea how to distinguish the enabler here? Maybe by GE names? Any opinion here? Greetings Robert From: ext Antonio Tapiador del Dujo [mailto:atapiador at dit.upm.es] Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2013 1:19 PM To: Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich) Cc: ext DANGERVILLE Cyril; fiware-idm-ge at lists.fi-ware.eu; Gesztesi, Gabor (EXT-Other - HU/Budapest); Meyer, Gerald (NSN - DE/Munich); 'istvan.zolyomi at gmail.com' Subject: Re: [Fiware-idm-ge] Input needed on supported protocols Please, find attached a new version that gathers the clarifications regarding SCIM tenants in the UPM GE El 25/09/13 16:18, Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich) escribió: Hi all, Please find a consolidated version attached. Please check if everything is correct. We still have to include the comments provided by Cyril (we will come back to you). Many thanks Robert From: ext DANGERVILLE Cyril [mailto:cyril.dangerville at thalesgroup.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 3:52 PM To: Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich); fiware-idm-ge at lists.fi-ware.eu<mailto:fiware-idm-ge at lists.fi-ware.eu> Cc: Gesztesi, Gabor (EXT-Other - HU/Budapest); Meyer, Gerald (NSN - DE/Munich); 'istvan.zolyomi at gmail.com<mailto:istvan.zolyomi at gmail.com>' Subject: RE: Input needed on supported protocols Hello, Sorry I was not at the conf call, but I just have 3 comments from the point of view of the Access Control GE integration: 1) It would help to have SCIM features marked "OPTIONAL" as specific rows in the SCIM REST API table, the same way you did for "Bulk": 3.2.2.2<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-scim-api-02#section-3.2.2.2>. Filtering 3.2.2.3<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-scim-api-02#section-3.2.2.3>. Sorting (and also 3.3.2<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-scim-api-02#section-3.3.2>. Modifying with PATCH, but less important to the AC GE) 4<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-scim-api-02#section-4>. Multi-Tenancy 2) For multi-tenancy in NSN, it is said: "Tenant ID may be specified in HTTP header according to 4.1.3." Is it not possible to use 4.1.1 URL prefix as well, like for the oauth Token Info request ? (See DigitalSelf-AC_GE.doc that Gabor sent me). 3) I am missing a feature like "OAuth Token Info/Validation API" (the equivalent of the Token Info mentioned in the previous point). This is quite important to the Access Control GE to be able to validate/get info about an OAuth access token, as you know. The issue is that it is not part of the standards as far as I know (?), so I let you decide where it would fit. Just for clarification. Thanks. Regards, Cyril De : fiware-idm-ge-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu<mailto:fiware-idm-ge-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu> [mailto:fiware-idm-ge-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich) Envoyé : mardi 24 septembre 2013 17:08 À : fiware-idm-ge at lists.fi-ware.eu<mailto:fiware-idm-ge at lists.fi-ware.eu> Cc : Gesztesi, Gabor (EXT-Other - HU/Budapest); Meyer, Gerald (NSN - DE/Munich); 'istvan.zolyomi at gmail.com<mailto:istvan.zolyomi at gmail.com>' Objet : [Fiware-idm-ge] Input needed on supported protocols Hi together, as discussed in our telco yesterday we agreed to provide a detailed overview on the supported standards. Please find attached an overview for the supported protocols in the case of NSN. We would need such kind as well for DT and UPM IDM GE. You could use the attached document as template. I already provided a placeholder in the document. Please add the relevant information from your side until end of Thursday this week. Many thanks in advance! Mit freundlichen Grüßen Best regards Seidl Robert Nokia Solutions and Networks Management International GmbH CTO R SWS SDT St.-Martin-Strasse 76 81541 Muenchen phone +49 (0)89 5159 21106 mobile +49 (0)172 3652971 email robert.seidl at nsn.com<mailto:emailrobert.seidl at nsn.com> Nokia Solutions and Networks Management International GmbH Geschäftsleitung / Board of Directors: Andreas Sauer, Stephanie Werner Sitz der Gesellschaft: München / Registered office: Munich Registergericht: München / Commercial registry: Munich, HRB 198081 _______________________________________________ Fiware-idm-ge mailing list Fiware-idm-ge at lists.fi-ware.eu<mailto:Fiware-idm-ge at lists.fi-ware.eu> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-idm-ge -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-idm-ge/attachments/20131001/889765f3/attachment.html>
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy