From juanjose.hierro at fiware.org Fri Aug 2 09:50:07 2019 From: juanjose.hierro at fiware.org (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2019 09:50:07 +0200 Subject: [ICT-13] Proposal DATAWORLD rejected Message-ID: <2149eee2-f92a-2f0c-734b-ea82c26ccd72@fiware.org> Dear all, ? Unfortunately, our DATAWORLD proposal got rejected despite it passed the threshold. ? Please find attached the corresponding rejection letter and ESR (Evaluation Summary Report). ? Reading it carefully, you will find that the proposal was well scored in terms of concept and many aspect of the approach.? Our weak points: * Lack of partner expert in data and privacy matters o Despite we identified the need to bring a partner like this from the beginning, our attempts to engage one were not fruitful. o As a consequence we have lacked of a good development of certain pieces in the proposal as highlighted in the ESR: + Explanation about explanation how data privacy compliance would be applied in the proposal - here it seems clear that standard text from other proposals about how data would be managed was not enough and we should have carried specific work + Explanation about how the solution would increase citizens' trust beyond the technical solution - lesson learned is that we should have tried to engage some partner specialized in * Description of how selected use cases would contribute and help to articulate impact (economic and social) - yes, we may have elaborated a bit more that rather than just focus on the general description about how we expected to achieve impact * Some details here and there we didn't have time to cover at perfection: o Not very good description of the relationship between WPs o Too brief description of milestones o More specific risk management ? Other than that, there are quite nice evaluation of other aspects.? I feel like if we had been able to onboard a proper partner that were expert on data and privacy matters (non-technical parts) and had time to cover those parts we didn't have time to review and polish (because had to deal with last-minute withdrawal of Volkswagen and devote effort to re-structuring of the consortia), we may have succeed. ? Let's see if the good stuff of the proposal can be re-used in another call. ? Cheers, -- Document Juanjo Hierro Chief Technology Officer juanjose.hierro at fiware.org www.linkedin.com/in/jhierro Twitter: @fiware @JuanjoHierro -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: foundation-logo.png Type: image/png Size: 8201 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 871904_DATAWORLD_ESR.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 214540 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Rejection decision Information Letter.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 104280 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jaugusto at televes.com Fri Aug 2 10:09:32 2019 From: jaugusto at televes.com (Javier Augusto Gonzalez) Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2019 10:09:32 +0200 Subject: [ICT-13] Proposal DATAWORLD rejected In-Reply-To: <2149eee2-f92a-2f0c-734b-ea82c26ccd72@fiware.org> References: <2149eee2-f92a-2f0c-734b-ea82c26ccd72@fiware.org> Message-ID: Dear Juanjo, Bad news. I agree that having one additional week would have made the difference. From Televes, it has been a pleasure to be involved in DATAWORLD and we are open to find new proposals to collaborate with all of you. Many thanks and keep in touch. Best regards, Javier El 02/08/2019 a las 9:50, Juanjo Hierro escribi?: > > Dear all, > > ? Unfortunately, our DATAWORLD proposal got rejected despite it passed > the threshold. > > ? Please find attached the corresponding rejection letter and ESR > (Evaluation Summary Report). > > ? Reading it carefully, you will find that the proposal was well > scored in terms of concept and many aspect of the approach.? Our weak > points: > > * Lack of partner expert in data and privacy matters > o Despite we identified the need to bring a partner like this > from the beginning, our attempts to engage one were not fruitful. > o As a consequence we have lacked of a good development of > certain pieces in the proposal as highlighted in the ESR: > + Explanation about explanation how data privacy compliance > would be applied in the proposal - here it seems clear > that standard text from other proposals about how data > would be managed was not enough and we should have carried > specific work > + Explanation about how the solution would increase > citizens' trust beyond the technical solution - lesson > learned is that we should have tried to engage some > partner specialized in > * Description of how selected use cases would contribute and help to > articulate impact (economic and social) - yes, we may have > elaborated a bit more that rather than just focus on the general > description about how we expected to achieve impact > * Some details here and there we didn't have time to cover at > perfection: > o Not very good description of the relationship between WPs > o Too brief description of milestones > o More specific risk management > > ? Other than that, there are quite nice evaluation of other aspects.? > I feel like if we had been able to onboard a proper partner that were > expert on data and privacy matters (non-technical parts) and had time > to cover those parts we didn't have time to review and polish (because > had to deal with last-minute withdrawal of Volkswagen and devote > effort to re-structuring of the consortia), we may have succeed. > > ? Let's see if the good stuff of the proposal can be re-used in > another call. > > ? Cheers, > > -- > Document > Juanjo Hierro > Chief Technology Officer > juanjose.hierro at fiware.org > www.linkedin.com/in/jhierro > Twitter: @fiware @JuanjoHierro > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________________________________________________ > > You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies on the following links: > - https://wiki.fiware.org/FIWARE_Privacy_Policy > - https://wiki.fiware.org/Cookies_Policy_FIWARE > > > Fiware-ids-data-economy-proposal mailing list > Fiware-ids-data-economy-proposal at lists.fiware.org > > To unsubscribe from Fiware-ids-data-economy-proposal mailing list, go to the information page of the list at: > https://lists.fiware.org/listinfo/fiware-ids-data-economy-proposal > -- Javier Augusto Gonzalez Gesti?n de Proyectos I+D / R&D Project Management LogoTLV Telev?s, S.A. R?a B. de Conxo, 17 15706 Santiago de Compostela (Spain) Tel: +34 981 522200 (Ext. 372) Fax: +34 981 522262 jaugusto at televes.com www.televes.com YouTube Facebook Twitter Respeta el medio ambiente: imprime este correo, solo si lo consideras necesario Nota de confidencialidad: Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener informaci?n privilegiada o confidencial. Si no es vd. el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilizaci?n, divulgaci?n y/o copia sin autorizaci?n est? prohibida en virtud de la legislaci?n vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma v?a y proceda a su destrucci?n. El correo electr?nico v?a Internet no permite asegurar la confidencialidad de los mensajes que se transmiten ni su integridad o correcta recepci?n. Televes Corporation no asume ninguna responsabilidad por estas circunstancias. Be environmentally responsible. Do not print this message unless absolutely necessary This message is intended exclusively for its addressee and may contain information that is CONFIDENTIAL and protected by a professional privilege or whose disclosure is prohibited by law. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any read, dissemination, copy or disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited by law. If this message has been received in error, please immediately notify us via e-mail and delete it. Internet e-mail neither guarantees the confidentiality nor the integrity or proper receipt of the messages sent. Televes Corporation does not assume any liability for those circumstances. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: foundation-logo.png Type: image/png Size: 8201 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: tlv_big_logo.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 118689 bytes Desc: Telev?s URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: youtube.png Type: image/png Size: 5005 bytes Desc: Telev?s en YouTube URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: facebook.png Type: image/png Size: 3336 bytes Desc: Telev?s en Facebook URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: twitter.png Type: image/png Size: 3221 bytes Desc: https://twitter.com/TelevesOfficial URL: From andres at fundingbox.com Fri Aug 2 10:21:54 2019 From: andres at fundingbox.com (=?UTF-8?B?QW5kcsOpcyBTw6FuY2hleiBTYW5kYXph?=) Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2019 10:21:54 +0200 Subject: [ICT-13] Proposal DATAWORLD rejected In-Reply-To: <2149eee2-f92a-2f0c-734b-ea82c26ccd72@fiware.org> References: <2149eee2-f92a-2f0c-734b-ea82c26ccd72@fiware.org> Message-ID: Thanks for the info Juanjo. Yes, the timing was very tight an extra week would have put us in the winning line. In any case thanks for the great effort and good job. Looking forward to the next one. Best regards, Andr?s On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 9:51 AM Juanjo Hierro wrote: > Dear all, > > Unfortunately, our DATAWORLD proposal got rejected despite it passed the > threshold. > > Please find attached the corresponding rejection letter and ESR > (Evaluation Summary Report). > > Reading it carefully, you will find that the proposal was well scored in > terms of concept and many aspect of the approach. Our weak points: > > - Lack of partner expert in data and privacy matters > - Despite we identified the need to bring a partner like this from > the beginning, our attempts to engage one were not fruitful. > - As a consequence we have lacked of a good development of certain > pieces in the proposal as highlighted in the ESR: > - Explanation about explanation how data privacy compliance would > be applied in the proposal - here it seems clear that standard text from > other proposals about how data would be managed was not enough and we > should have carried specific work > - Explanation about how the solution would increase citizens' > trust beyond the technical solution - lesson learned is that we should have > tried to engage some partner specialized in > - Description of how selected use cases would contribute and > help to articulate impact (economic and social) - yes, we may have > elaborated a bit more that rather than just focus on the general > description about how we expected to achieve impact > - Some details here and there we didn't have time to cover at > perfection: > - Not very good description of the relationship between WPs > - Too brief description of milestones > - More specific risk management > > Other than that, there are quite nice evaluation of other aspects. I > feel like if we had been able to onboard a proper partner that were expert > on data and privacy matters (non-technical parts) and had time to cover > those parts we didn't have time to review and polish (because had to deal > with last-minute withdrawal of Volkswagen and devote effort to > re-structuring of the consortia), we may have succeed. > > Let's see if the good stuff of the proposal can be re-used in another > call. > > Cheers, > -- > Juanjo Hierro > Chief Technology Officer > juanjose.hierro at fiware.org > www.linkedin.com/in/jhierro > Twitter: @fiware @JuanjoHierro > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________________________________________________ > > You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies on the > following links: > - https://wiki.fiware.org/FIWARE_Privacy_Policy > - https://wiki.fiware.org/Cookies_Policy_FIWARE > > > Fiware-ids-data-economy-proposal mailing list > Fiware-ids-data-economy-proposal at lists.fiware.org > > To unsubscribe from Fiware-ids-data-economy-proposal mailing list, go to > the information page of the list at: > https://lists.fiware.org/listinfo/fiware-ids-data-economy-proposal > > -- Andr?s S?nchez Sandaza - Reach me at @andres.ss Project Manager @ LEDGER Director @ FundingBox Communities #FundingGrowth fundingbox.com Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | Medium Download FundingBox App This message is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain, together with its attachments, confidential information protected by law. If you have received this message by accident or by error, please notify the sender immediately and delete it together with the eventual attachments from your computer. Thank you. Since we have your email address and in relation to any personal data provided by you, we would like to inform that data controller is FundingBox Communities, S.L. with its register office in Madrid, Spain. FundingBox as a personal data administrator, processes personal data in accordance with the provisions of the General Data Protection Regulations. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: foundation-logo.png Type: image/png Size: 8201 bytes Desc: not available URL: From dom at anysolution.eu Fri Aug 2 10:40:14 2019 From: dom at anysolution.eu (Dolores) Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2019 10:40:14 +0200 Subject: [ICT-13] Proposal DATAWORLD rejected In-Reply-To: <2149eee2-f92a-2f0c-734b-ea82c26ccd72@fiware.org> References: <2149eee2-f92a-2f0c-734b-ea82c26ccd72@fiware.org> Message-ID: Dear Juanjo and all, Yes, it?s a pity this proposal was not approved. The score is good and with some more days more perhaps it would have been approved. Let?s try in a future call Best regards M. Dolores Ord??ez AnySolution S.L. Palma de Mallorca (Spain) M. (0034)619712806 Email: dom at anysolution.eu This e-mail and any attachments are confidential. They are intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the named addressee(s) you must not use, disclose, retain or reproduce all or any part of the information contained in this e-mail or any attachments. Any unauthorized use or disclosure may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by mistake, please inform the sender immediately and delete it and all copies from your system and destroy any hard copies of it. > El 2 ago 2019, a las 9:50, Juanjo Hierro escribi?: > > Dear all, > > Unfortunately, our DATAWORLD proposal got rejected despite it passed the threshold. > > Please find attached the corresponding rejection letter and ESR (Evaluation Summary Report). > > Reading it carefully, you will find that the proposal was well scored in terms of concept and many aspect of the approach. Our weak points: > > Lack of partner expert in data and privacy matters > Despite we identified the need to bring a partner like this from the beginning, our attempts to engage one were not fruitful. > As a consequence we have lacked of a good development of certain pieces in the proposal as highlighted in the ESR: > Explanation about explanation how data privacy compliance would be applied in the proposal - here it seems clear that standard text from other proposals about how data would be managed was not enough and we should have carried specific work > Explanation about how the solution would increase citizens' trust beyond the technical solution - lesson learned is that we should have tried to engage some partner specialized in > Description of how selected use cases would contribute and help to articulate impact (economic and social) - yes, we may have elaborated a bit more that rather than just focus on the general description about how we expected to achieve impact > Some details here and there we didn't have time to cover at perfection: > Not very good description of the relationship between WPs > Too brief description of milestones > More specific risk management > Other than that, there are quite nice evaluation of other aspects. I feel like if we had been able to onboard a proper partner that were expert on data and privacy matters (non-technical parts) and had time to cover those parts we didn't have time to review and polish (because had to deal with last-minute withdrawal of Volkswagen and devote effort to re-structuring of the consortia), we may have succeed. > Let's see if the good stuff of the proposal can be re-used in another call. > > Cheers, > -- > Juanjo Hierro > Chief Technology Officer > juanjose.hierro at fiware.org > www.linkedin.com/in/jhierro > Twitter: @fiware @JuanjoHierro > > > > > > > > > > <871904_DATAWORLD_ESR.pdf> > > __________________________________________________________________________________________ > > You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies on the following links: > - https://wiki.fiware.org/FIWARE_Privacy_Policy > - https://wiki.fiware.org/Cookies_Policy_FIWARE > > > Fiware-ids-data-economy-proposal mailing list > Fiware-ids-data-economy-proposal at lists.fiware.org > > To unsubscribe from Fiware-ids-data-economy-proposal mailing list, go to the information page of the list at: > https://lists.fiware.org/listinfo/fiware-ids-data-economy-proposal > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mminano at movisat.com Fri Aug 2 11:06:44 2019 From: mminano at movisat.com (=?UTF-8?B?TWlndWVsIE1pw7Fhbm8gTnXDsWV6?=) Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2019 11:06:44 +0200 Subject: [ICT-13] Proposal DATAWORLD rejected In-Reply-To: <2149eee2-f92a-2f0c-734b-ea82c26ccd72@fiware.org> References: <2149eee2-f92a-2f0c-734b-ea82c26ccd72@fiware.org> Message-ID: Dear all, First of all, thank you for the good work done against the clock. Especially to Juanjo for leadership and coordination but also to the other partners. I agree that the proposal meets all the conditions to be presented again and from MOVISAT we offer ourselves to continue the work for a re-submission Best wishes, El vie., 2 ago. 2019 a las 9:51, Juanjo Hierro () escribi?: > Dear all, > > Unfortunately, our DATAWORLD proposal got rejected despite it passed the > threshold. > > Please find attached the corresponding rejection letter and ESR > (Evaluation Summary Report). > > Reading it carefully, you will find that the proposal was well scored in > terms of concept and many aspect of the approach. Our weak points: > > - Lack of partner expert in data and privacy matters > - Despite we identified the need to bring a partner like this from > the beginning, our attempts to engage one were not fruitful. > - As a consequence we have lacked of a good development of certain > pieces in the proposal as highlighted in the ESR: > - Explanation about explanation how data privacy compliance would > be applied in the proposal - here it seems clear that standard text from > other proposals about how data would be managed was not enough and we > should have carried specific work > - Explanation about how the solution would increase citizens' > trust beyond the technical solution - lesson learned is that we should have > tried to engage some partner specialized in > - Description of how selected use cases would contribute and > help to articulate impact (economic and social) - yes, we may have > elaborated a bit more that rather than just focus on the general > description about how we expected to achieve impact > - Some details here and there we didn't have time to cover at > perfection: > - Not very good description of the relationship between WPs > - Too brief description of milestones > - More specific risk management > > Other than that, there are quite nice evaluation of other aspects. I > feel like if we had been able to onboard a proper partner that were expert > on data and privacy matters (non-technical parts) and had time to cover > those parts we didn't have time to review and polish (because had to deal > with last-minute withdrawal of Volkswagen and devote effort to > re-structuring of the consortia), we may have succeed. > > Let's see if the good stuff of the proposal can be re-used in another > call. > > Cheers, > -- > Juanjo Hierro > Chief Technology Officer > juanjose.hierro at fiware.org > www.linkedin.com/in/jhierro > Twitter: @fiware @JuanjoHierro > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________________________________________________ > > You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies on the > following links: > - https://wiki.fiware.org/FIWARE_Privacy_Policy > - https://wiki.fiware.org/Cookies_Policy_FIWARE > > > Fiware-ids-data-economy-proposal mailing list > Fiware-ids-data-economy-proposal at lists.fiware.org > > To unsubscribe from Fiware-ids-data-economy-proposal mailing list, go to > the information page of the list at: > https://lists.fiware.org/listinfo/fiware-ids-data-economy-proposal > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: foundation-logo.png Type: image/png Size: 8201 bytes Desc: not available URL: