[Fiware-lab-federation-nodes] [CESNET #134122] Re: experiences with HA

[Sean Murphy]

Hi Riwal,

Good feedback - thanks for that.

As a matter of interest, have you ever needed to exercise any of the HA
capabilities or have you tested it in anger?

BR,
Seán.

On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Riwal KERHERVE via RT <
xifi-support at rt.cesnet.cz> wrote:

> Sean,
>
> I do not have experience with Kilo in HA, but our node is in Juno and in
> HA. We installed it with fuel 6.0 (2 controllers and 1 Arbitrator). We
> never have any trouble until now: very stable, nothing to be with HA in
> grizzly.
>
> BR
> Riwal
>
> De : fiware-lab-federation-nodes-bounces at lists.fiware.org [mailto:
> fiware-lab-federation-nodes-bounces at lists.fiware.org] De la part de Sean
> Murphy
> Envoyé : jeudi 12 novembre 2015 16:33
> À : fiware-lab-federation-nodes at lists.fiware.org
> Objet : [Fiware-lab-federation-nodes] experiences with HA
>
> Hi all,
>
> We're looking at our upgrade strategy and we're curious to
> hear any experience with Kilo HA both from the deployment
> perspective as well as the operations perspective.
>
> From xifi, I remember Fanis reporting a split-brain scenario
> with HA and in the end he opted not to go with a HA solution;
> this gives me pause for thought when considering this
> deployment solution, even though it seems to be the
> preferred solution.
>
> Generally, we would be well disposed to a HA deployment
> as we would like to learn about it, but we do not want to
> end up deploying a technology that is too far from production
> readiness.
>
> Does anyone have any experience that they can share on this
> point?
>
> BR,
> Seán.
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-lab-federation-nodes/attachments/20151112/e90cdab0/attachment.html>