In both cases, it looks like packets get queued up and then get released and the response is rapid - in the case of trento, it looks like packets were queued somewhere for 55s! BR, Seán. On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 4:56 PM, Cristian Cristelotti < cristian.cristelotti.coll at trentinonetwork.it> wrote: > We noticed the same behavior > > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=100 ttl=47 time=55475 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=101 ttl=47 time=54467 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=102 ttl=47 time=53461 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=103 ttl=47 time=52454 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=104 ttl=47 time=51450 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=105 ttl=47 time=50442 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=106 ttl=47 time=49435 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=107 ttl=47 time=48430 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=108 ttl=47 time=47423 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=109 ttl=47 time=46417 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=110 ttl=47 time=45410 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=111 ttl=47 time=44404 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=112 ttl=47 time=43397 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=113 ttl=47 time=42391 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=114 ttl=47 time=41437 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=115 ttl=47 time=40431 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=116 ttl=47 time=39425 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=117 ttl=47 time=38427 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=119 ttl=47 time=36425 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=120 ttl=47 time=35419 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=121 ttl=47 time=34415 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=122 ttl=47 time=33410 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=123 ttl=47 time=32414 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=124 ttl=47 time=31408 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=125 ttl=47 time=30402 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=127 ttl=47 time=28397 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=128 ttl=47 time=27389 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=129 ttl=47 time=26383 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=130 ttl=47 time=25378 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=131 ttl=47 time=24377 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=132 ttl=47 time=23375 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=133 ttl=47 time=22387 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=134 ttl=47 time=21384 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=135 ttl=47 time=20378 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=136 ttl=47 time=19372 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=139 ttl=47 time=16365 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=140 ttl=47 time=15362 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=141 ttl=47 time=14355 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=142 ttl=47 time=13350 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=143 ttl=47 time=12347 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=145 ttl=47 time=10340 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=146 ttl=47 time=9334 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=147 ttl=47 time=8329 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=148 ttl=47 time=7323 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=149 ttl=47 time=6316 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=150 ttl=47 time=5315 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=151 ttl=47 time=4318 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=152 ttl=47 time=3323 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=153 ttl=47 time=2329 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=154 ttl=47 time=1323 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=155 ttl=47 time=1049 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=156 ttl=47 time=1382 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=157 ttl=47 time=1301 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=158 ttl=47 time=1102 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=159 ttl=47 time=1759 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=160 ttl=47 time=2446 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=161 ttl=47 time=2783 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=162 ttl=47 time=3261 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=163 ttl=47 time=3466 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=164 ttl=47 time=3453 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=165 ttl=47 time=3198 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=166 ttl=47 time=2939 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=167 ttl=47 time=2922 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=168 ttl=47 time=2817 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=169 ttl=47 time=2672 ms > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_seq=170 ttl=47 time=2427 ms > --- 130.206.84.8 ping statistics --- > 173 packets transmitted, 156 received, 9% packet loss, time 172799ms > rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 40.530/26201.711/89665.874/29241.902 ms, pipe 90 > > > Cristian > > ----- Messaggio originale ----- > Da: "Cristian CMECIU" <ccmeciu at images-et-reseaux.com> > A: fiware-lab-federation-nodes at lists.fiware.org > Inviato: Martedì, 8 marzo 2016 16:38:34 > Oggetto: [Fiware-lab-federation-nodes] Keystone connectivity problems > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > Since 15 :30 PM we have Keystone connectivity problems: time outs, packet > loss > > It is linked to the maintenance procedure? > > > > root at node-1:~# ping 130.206.84.8 > > PING 130.206.84.8 (130.206.84.8) 56(84) bytes of data. > > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_req=1 ttl=51 time=33209 ms > > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_req=2 ttl=51 time=32205 ms > > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_req=3 ttl=51 time=31197 ms > > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_req=5 ttl=51 time=29215 ms > > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_req=6 ttl=51 time=28226 ms > > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_req=7 ttl=51 time=27219 ms > > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_req=8 ttl=51 time=26213 ms > > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_req=10 ttl=51 time=24203 ms > > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_req=11 ttl=51 time=23195 ms > > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_req=12 ttl=51 time=22189 ms > > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_req=13 ttl=51 time=21182 ms > > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_req=14 ttl=51 time=20176 ms > > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_req=15 ttl=51 time=19171 ms > > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_req=16 ttl=51 time=18164 ms > > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_req=17 ttl=51 time=17158 ms > > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_req=18 ttl=51 time=16152 ms > > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_req=19 ttl=51 time=15147 ms > > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_req=20 ttl=51 time=14140 ms > > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_req=21 ttl=51 time=13134 ms > > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_req=22 ttl=51 time=12128 ms > > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_req=23 ttl=51 time=11124 ms > > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_req=25 ttl=51 time=9114 ms > > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_req=26 ttl=51 time=8108 ms > > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_req=27 ttl=51 time=7102 ms > > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_req=28 ttl=51 time=6096 ms > > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_req=29 ttl=51 time=5092 ms > > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_req=30 ttl=51 time=4084 ms > > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_req=31 ttl=51 time=3077 ms > > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_req=32 ttl=51 time=2071 ms > > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_req=33 ttl=51 time=1066 ms > > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_req=34 ttl=51 time=1246 ms > > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_req=37 ttl=51 time=2010 ms > > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_req=38 ttl=51 time=1503 ms > > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_req=39 ttl=51 time=2309 ms > > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_req=41 ttl=51 time=3152 ms > > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_req=43 ttl=51 time=2483 ms > > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_req=44 ttl=51 time=2456 ms > > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_req=46 ttl=51 time=2888 ms > > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_req=47 ttl=51 time=2867 ms > > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_req=48 ttl=51 time=2846 ms > > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_req=49 ttl=51 time=3192 ms > > 64 bytes from 130.206.84.8: icmp_req=50 ttl=51 time=2657 ms > > ^C > > --- 130.206.84.8 ping statistics --- > > 53 packets transmitted, 42 received, 20% packet loss, time 52285ms > > rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 1066.468/12623.444/33209.732/10313.800 ms, pipe 33 > > > > > > BR, > > Cristian CMECIU > > Fiware-Lab/ Lannion Region > > ImaginLab Support Engineer > > > > FIWARE_lab > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-lab-federation-nodes mailing list > Fiware-lab-federation-nodes at lists.fiware.org > https://lists.fiware.org/listinfo/fiware-lab-federation-nodes > > -- > Cristian Cristelotti > > Collaboratore di Trentino Network Srl > > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-lab-federation-nodes/attachments/20160308/c889ea06/attachment.html>
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy