From toni at playsign.net Mon Dec 2 11:09:49 2013 From: toni at playsign.net (Toni Alatalo) Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 12:09:49 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-miwi] A Candidate AssetPipe: glTF aka. Collada JSON In-Reply-To: <529714D7.2090505@dfki.de> References: <529714D7.2090505@dfki.de> Message-ID: On 28 Nov 2013, at 12:03, Kristian Sons wrote: > As also mentioned in the paper, I see three issues: > 1. The minimum of number of request is given by the number of meshes. For scenes with many meshes, this will be the bottleneck. Additionally, this minimum can only be reached if the attribute data is interleaved and not indexed. I don't know the status for current exporters, but I guess most exporters would just support interleaving for very specific signatures I think this has been addressed: there is a single file for all meshes, in the case of our Oulu test scene: http://playsign.tklapp.com:8000/glTF-webgl-viewer/model/oulu/MastersceneBlendercompression.bin So for the geometry it is 2 requests for the whole scene: the scene JSON, which includes the materials, & the geometry binary. Then additional fetches for the texture images but that?s normal and good AFAIK (supposing small individual textures are in larger texture atlas images anyway). Also shader sources are separate requests now (but typically there?s not that many - if it?s a problem I suppose they could be joined or embedded in the JSON or something). Or do you mean that even when the data is in a single file there will be multiple requests for the different arrays in it, for vertices and normals etc? I?ve been assuming that?s not the case. Was not able to verify with the Chrome debugger yet. In the scene the references to the mesh geometry arrays in that one big collection are like this, in http://playsign.tklapp.com:8000/glTF-webgl-viewer/model/oulu/mastersceneBlender.json "PallasBlock-mesh": { "extensions": { "Open3DGC-compression": { "compressedData": { "bufferView": "bufferView_2669", "byteOffset": 603141, "count": 9417, "floatAttributesIndexes": { "attribute_861": 0 }, "indicesCount": 1053, "mode": "binary", "type": 5121, "verticesCount": 1053 } } }, "name": "PallasBlock", ? As for exporters, the point is that the official COLLADA2glTF converter is used to create the files for transfer so only one implementation of optimal organization of the data is needed. > 2. The registry for compressors is way better than a fixed set of compression methods and Khronos has a good practice of extension registries. However, I think that 3D data is so inhomogeneous that even this is not flexible enough. Instead we propose to use a "Code on demand" appraoch, which means that a fallback decoder implementation could be downloaded if the rendering system has no built-in (possible HW accelerated) decompressor for a data set. Neil liked this idea, I don't know if maybe glTF has moved into this direction Ok. I didn?t see indications for this yet, Erno looked closer so can perhaps fill in, but I think the whole compression plugin system was to be revisited still. Anyhow I?m really happy that the Open3DGC compression is there already, both in the converter for encoding and in the webgl loader for decoding so we have something that could use already. Perhaps your proposed code-on-demand is an improvement for a bit later? Actually the idea of having registry / extensions does not seem that far from also being able to load the decoder on-demand. > 3. Using the GL buffers as common ground for all mesh formats is a good idea. However, finding a suitable abstraction layer for materials and animations is way harder and not even solved in a high abstraction format such as COLLADA My assumption here has been that COLLADA solves it to some extent and glTF carries over the same. Basics seem to work and arbitrary shaders are AFAIK supported so again this so far looks like something we could use. Certainly what you say is true but I think we can live with a limited solution first: for example support for basic materials, custom shaders and animations enough for basic skeletal animations to work. > BTW, it would probably be easy (and interesting) to implement a glTF plug-in for XML3D. Agreed. > Jan (in CC) is a PhD student in our group who started to design and implement a transmission format that addresses the requirements we collected in the position paper above. It is very generic and allows to stream structured binary data and to decode the data in parallel. Currently it's not possible to chunks of a request if ArrayBuffers are requested (this is only possible for text requests). We identified this issue in the W3C CG together with Fraunhofer IGD (and some Audio guys who are interested in the same feature). If we had this, it would be perfect cause everything could be in one request. Ok great. I?ll still need to properly read that paper and probably discuss with Erno about the specifics you mention there. Regarding the roadmap, I?ve been thinking we should have *some* recommended asset pipeline / scene & mesh etc. format very soon (within weeks). Ideally further down that road we?d then the advances you have described. glTF still seems like a valid candidate for the immediate / near term. I?m a bit unsure still though whether understood correctly your concerns & how glTF has AFAIK addressed them. Also we still need to investigate and test materials and animations (the git log of the three loader seemed that it would have already gotten animation support ok this fall but we don?t really know yet). For the long run, have you considered it a suitable umbrella / framework where your advances could be integrated and standardized later on, or do you consider it somehow flawed or impractical so that your solutions won?t fit in ? and hence propose we would not adopt it for FI-WARE &/ realXtend? I?ve been wondering whether it really means anything that something is proposed and driven by Chronos. It sounds great and looks convincing on the surface but is the work still up to random volunteers who may or may not complete the work in some uncertain schedule? They are behind the planned schedules from spring and also the later autumn SIGGRAPH talks. If the basics and the framework are good we can help there and take care of the required implementations ourselves so that?s not really a problem for us though, just something that have been wondering. > In a next step, we will implemnt some encoder/decoders. We want to show that some of the decoding could be achieved in the vertex shader (e.g. decoding of quantized vertex attributes) other could be decoded using Web Workers/Xflow and/or WebCL. Neil is also very open for good technical solutions. Cool ? such parallel number crunching indeed does not seem like the best task for normal browser JS, though it always surprises me how quickly for example that Oulu scene is shown from the compressed Open3DGC data (same with the OpenCTM tests earlier) with the current solutions (I suppose the JIT compilers succeed well there). > Best regards, > Kristian Thanks a lot for the info and was great to hear how you indeed have been active here for long already, ~Toni > > > > > -- > _______________________________________________________________________________ > > Kristian Sons > Deutsches Forschungszentrum f?r K?nstliche Intelligenz GmbH, DFKI > Agenten und Simulierte Realit?t > Campus, Geb. D 3 2, Raum 0.77 > 66123 Saarbr?cken, Germany > > Phone: +49 681 85775-3833 > Phone: +49 681 302-3833 > Fax: +49 681 85775?2235 > kristian.sons at dfki.de > http://www.xml3d.org > > Gesch?ftsf?hrung: Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender) > Dr. Walter Olthoff > > Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes > Amtsgericht Kaiserslautern, HRB 2313 > _______________________________________________________________________________ > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From erno at playsign.net Tue Dec 3 09:21:53 2013 From: erno at playsign.net (Erno Kuusela) Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 10:21:53 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-miwi] Oulu bi-weekly f2f meeting Message-ID: <20131203082153.GC47616@ee.oulu.fi> Hello, It's that tuesday again - any volunteers for hosting the 13:00 meeting? Erno From arto.heikkinen at cie.fi Tue Dec 3 09:28:48 2013 From: arto.heikkinen at cie.fi (Arto Heikkinen) Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 10:28:48 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-miwi] Oulu bi-weekly f2f meeting In-Reply-To: <20131203082153.GC47616@ee.oulu.fi> References: <20131203082153.GC47616@ee.oulu.fi> Message-ID: <529D9640.7080509@cie.fi> Hi, We can have the meeting here at CIE (Japanese garden). -Arto On 3.12.2013 10:21, Erno Kuusela wrote: > Hello, > > It's that tuesday again - any volunteers for hosting the 13:00 meeting? > > Erno > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-miwi mailing list > Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi From jonne at adminotech.com Tue Dec 3 10:13:09 2013 From: jonne at adminotech.com (Jonne Nauha) Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 11:13:09 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-miwi] Oulu bi-weekly f2f meeting In-Reply-To: <529D9640.7080509@cie.fi> References: <20131203082153.GC47616@ee.oulu.fi> <529D9640.7080509@cie.fi> Message-ID: Adminotech will not be attending this week. The reason is not the location, CIE is a nice place :) Best regards, Jonne Nauha Meshmoon developer at Adminotech Ltd. www.meshmoon.com On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Arto Heikkinen wrote: > Hi, > > We can have the meeting here at CIE (Japanese garden). > > -Arto > > > On 3.12.2013 10:21, Erno Kuusela wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> It's that tuesday again - any volunteers for hosting the 13:00 meeting? >> >> Erno >> _______________________________________________ >> Fiware-miwi mailing list >> Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu >> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi >> > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-miwi mailing list > Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mach at zhaw.ch Wed Dec 4 07:52:30 2013 From: mach at zhaw.ch (Christof Marti) Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 07:52:30 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-miwi] MIWI weekly meeting canceled Message-ID: Hi everybody I am still in Madrid working on the TF continuation proposal. In favor of this, we cancel todays telco. Please check last weeks minutes for the open and ongoing work: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1THeRIPBTq3IVgUaMV_6yTSNU6K2QgPXlxATKO607YDk/edit In particular: - Topic 2 - Roadmap: Please check and cleanup the mentioned points, if not done yet - Topic 3 - Release 3: Arto has created and sent the link to the template pages for the manuals last week. Please continue working on the install&admin and user&developer guides (They should be ready for review by next Tuesday!) https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/Template_GE_-_Installation_and_Administration_Guide https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/Template_GE_-_User_and_Programmers_Guide https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/Template_GE_-_Unit_Testing_Plan_and_Report And thanks to all for your contributions to the continuation proposal. If you have any questions or topics to discuss, please contact me by email. Thanks Best regards Christof ---- InIT Cloud Computing Lab - ICCLab http://cloudcomp.ch Institut of Applied Information Technology - InIT Zurich University of Applied Sciences - ZHAW School of Engineering Phone: +41 58 934 70 63 Skype: christof-marti From lasse.oorni at ludocraft.com Wed Dec 4 10:07:07 2013 From: lasse.oorni at ludocraft.com (=?iso-8859-1?Q?=22Lasse_=D6=F6rni=22?=) Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 11:07:07 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-miwi] MIWI weekly meeting canceled In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <9b7655bb35d269e386ef6b09a02699ed.squirrel@urho.ludocraft.com> > In particular: > > - Topic 2 - Roadmap: Please check and cleanup the mentioned points, if not > done yet > - Topic 3 - Release 3: Arto has created and sent the link to the template > pages for the manuals last week. > Please continue working on the install&admin and user&developer guides > (They should be ready for review by next Tuesday!) Hi, there's something I want to ask. Due to resource constraints at LudoCraft there is no implementation work started on the Virtual Characters GE yet, and if you look at the roadmap I've postponed all features on it to the 3.3 release. As a consequence it will be pretty much impossible to produce sensible documentation for that GE at this point (it will naturally be produced to release 3.3) Do you think this will be a problem? -- Lasse ??rni Game Programmer LudoCraft Ltd. From Philipp.Slusallek at dfki.de Tue Dec 10 06:57:52 2013 From: Philipp.Slusallek at dfki.de (Philipp Slusallek) Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 06:57:52 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-miwi] A Candidate AssetPipe: glTF aka. Collada JSON In-Reply-To: <529714D7.2090505@dfki.de> References: <529714D7.2090505@dfki.de> Message-ID: <52A6AD60.40307@dfki.de> Hi all, Important discussion -- thanks! My impression is that Khronos is open for better suggestions. I believe we have some and should bring them forward. This would be a great step for the project as well to be able to point active standardization work in this area as well. If people are interested we could maybe start Jan's implementation and the position paper as a starting point for such a proposal. It seems we now also have extensive models to test scenes with (probably we could even use our unit test framework for automating this). Having a solid transfer format is the main goal from my POV. Whether Collada ist the best intermediate option is up for debate (and testing!). Specifically, there are often many other data items associated with meshes that need to be transferred, where Collada is likely to loose quite a few of them (portable shader formats come to mind here, for example). One thing that would be good to include as well is the POP-Buffer idea from IGD (http://x3dom.org/pop/files/popbuffer2013.pdf). This is pretty much orthogonal and simply needs some sorting in the converter and a little bit of rounding computations in the vertex shader. If we can download the binary data in chunks, this is a great and automatic solution for LOD (based on the same idea as the best generic LOD algorithms from Georgia tech at the time), still my favorite today, despite all the others that were developed). Another issues that we could jointly address is the chunk loading of binary data. Here it might make sense to write a short paper (1-2 pages, maybe officially supported by the audio guys and the Dec3D group) highlighting the necessity (again we could use/reference the position paper for details). This could then be sent to our contacts at the browser vendors as well as W3C. I think we could really affect the industry as a whole here. What do you think? Best, Philipp Am 28.11.2013 11:03, schrieb Kristian Sons: > Hi Toni, >> There?s still way to go with the glTF pipeline so for now (probably >> for a month still) our recommendation for getting scenes simply from >> e.g. Blender to Three.js is the Three JSON format (used in the master >> branch of the city rendering repo & live demo), and CTM for an >> optimized solution (but it requires custom setup to set materials). Am >> very curious to hear what the DFKI gfx / XML3D folks think of this ? >> some of you perhaps attended the SIGGRAPH sessions even?. > > yes, we were really active in this area. I presented together with > Fabrice Robinet at the WebGL and COLLADA BOF at Siggraph last year. We > also had discussions with the transmission format group at the Ninth AR > Standards Community Meeting this year and at Web3D2013 in San Sebastian. > Especially the discussions with Neil in San Sebastian were really good. > From our experiences of the XML3DRepo paper we created a position paper: > http://www.perey.com/ARStandards/[Klein]3dtf-position-paper_Ninth_AR_Standards_Meeting.pdf > > > As also mentioned in the paper, I see three issues: > 1. The minimum of number of request is given by the number of meshes. > For scenes with many meshes, this will be the bottleneck. Additionally, > this minimum can only be reached if the attribute data is interleaved > and not indexed. I don't know the status for current exporters, but I > guess most exporters would just support interleaving for very specific > signatures > 2. The registry for compressors is way better than a fixed set of > compression methods and Khronos has a good practice of extension > registries. However, I think that 3D data is so inhomogeneous that even > this is not flexible enough. Instead we propose to use a "Code on > demand" appraoch, which means that a fallback decoder implementation > could be downloaded if the rendering system has no built-in (possible HW > accelerated) decompressor for a data set. Neil liked this idea, I don't > know if maybe glTF has moved into this direction > 3. Using the GL buffers as common ground for all mesh formats is a good > idea. However, finding a suitable abstraction layer for materials and > animations is way harder and not even solved in a high abstraction > format such as COLLADA > > BTW, it would probably be easy (and interesting) to implement a glTF > plug-in for XML3D. > > Jan (in CC) is a PhD student in our group who started to design and > implement a transmission format that addresses the requirements we > collected in the position paper above. It is very generic and allows to > stream structured binary data and to decode the data in parallel. > Currently it's not possible to chunks of a request if ArrayBuffers are > requested (this is only possible for text requests). We identified this > issue in the W3C CG together with Fraunhofer IGD (and some Audio guys > who are interested in the same feature). If we had this, it would be > perfect cause everything could be in one request. > > In a next step, we will implemnt some encoder/decoders. We want to show > that some of the decoding could be achieved in the vertex shader (e.g. > decoding of quantized vertex attributes) other could be decoded using > Web Workers/Xflow and/or WebCL. Neil is also very open for good > technical solutions. > > Best regards, > Kristian > > > > -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Deutsches Forschungszentrum f?r K?nstliche Intelligenz (DFKI) GmbH Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern Gesch?ftsf?hrung: Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender) Dr. Walter Olthoff Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes Sitz der Gesellschaft: Kaiserslautern (HRB 2313) USt-Id.Nr.: DE 148646973, Steuernummer: 19/673/0060/3 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: slusallek.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 441 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jarkko at cyberlightning.com Tue Dec 10 14:06:39 2013 From: jarkko at cyberlightning.com (Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila) Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 15:06:39 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-miwi] Wiki document delivery deadline today Message-ID: Hello all, Just to inform you that all Cyberlightning documents in the wiki (admin guide, user guide, test documents) are done as requested by 10th Dec. All comments are welcome! :) -- Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila VP, Technology Cyberlightning Ltd. mobile. +358 405245142 email. jarkko at cyberlightning.com Go to www.cybersli.de and enrich your presentations! www.cyberlightning.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mach at zhaw.ch Tue Dec 10 14:12:30 2013 From: mach at zhaw.ch (Christof Marti) Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 14:12:30 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-miwi] Wiki document delivery deadline today In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <005DA0F0-D289-4684-8606-EFFF4766A1F9@zhaw.ch> Cool Thanks a lot. Will check tonight. Still in proposal mode. ;) Christof Am 10.12.2013 um 14:06 schrieb Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila : > Hello all, > > Just to inform you that all Cyberlightning documents in the wiki (admin guide, user guide, test documents) are done as requested by 10th Dec. All comments are welcome! :) > > -- > Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila > VP, Technology > Cyberlightning Ltd. > > mobile. +358 405245142 > email. jarkko at cyberlightning.com > > Go to www.cybersli.de and enrich your presentations! > > www.cyberlightning.com > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-miwi mailing list > Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From antti.karhu at cie.fi Tue Dec 10 15:18:41 2013 From: antti.karhu at cie.fi (Antti Karhu) Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 16:18:41 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-miwi] Wiki document delivery deadline today In-Reply-To: <005DA0F0-D289-4684-8606-EFFF4766A1F9@zhaw.ch> References: <005DA0F0-D289-4684-8606-EFFF4766A1F9@zhaw.ch> Message-ID: Hi, All CIE documents are also ready and can be found in the wiki. 2013/12/10 Christof Marti > Cool > > Thanks a lot. Will check tonight. Still in proposal mode. ;) > > Christof > > Am 10.12.2013 um 14:06 schrieb Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila < > jarkko at cyberlightning.com>: > > Hello all, > > Just to inform you that all Cyberlightning documents in the wiki (admin > guide, user guide, test documents) are done as requested by 10th Dec. All > comments are welcome! :) > > -- > Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila > VP, Technology > Cyberlightning Ltd. > > mobile. +358 405245142 > email. jarkko at cyberlightning.com > > Go to www.cybersli.de and enrich your presentations! > > www.cyberlightning.com > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-miwi mailing list > Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi > > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-miwi mailing list > Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Philipp.Slusallek at dfki.de Tue Dec 10 21:58:13 2013 From: Philipp.Slusallek at dfki.de (Philipp Slusallek) Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 21:58:13 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-miwi] Meeting tomorrow Message-ID: <52A78065.3090501@dfki.de> Hi, I will have to be at a meeting with our state ministry tomorrow morning and might not be able to join or joint late. So please go ahead without me. Best, Philipp -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Deutsches Forschungszentrum f?r K?nstliche Intelligenz (DFKI) GmbH Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern Gesch?ftsf?hrung: Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender) Dr. Walter Olthoff Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes Sitz der Gesellschaft: Kaiserslautern (HRB 2313) USt-Id.Nr.: DE 148646973, Steuernummer: 19/673/0060/3 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: slusallek.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 441 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mach at zhaw.ch Wed Dec 11 09:56:56 2013 From: mach at zhaw.ch (Marti Christof (mach)) Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 08:56:56 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-miwi] Meeting postponed to 10:30 Message-ID: <9864BEF4-8E4B-41B2-AC49-9B01F74B403E@zhaw.ch> Sorry. I am stuck in important meeting which got delayed and have to postpone our call for about 30 minutes. I will open the bridge at 10:30. Best regards Christof ---- InIT Cloud Computing Lab - ICCLab http://cloudcomp.ch Institut of Applied Information Technology - InIT Zurich University of Applied Sciences - ZHAW School of Engineering Phone: +41 58 934 70 63 Skype: christof-marti From torsten.spieldenner at dfki.de Wed Dec 11 10:37:55 2013 From: torsten.spieldenner at dfki.de (Torsten Spieldenner) Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 10:37:55 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-miwi] Meeting postponed to 10:30 In-Reply-To: <9864BEF4-8E4B-41B2-AC49-9B01F74B403E@zhaw.ch> References: <9864BEF4-8E4B-41B2-AC49-9B01F74B403E@zhaw.ch> Message-ID: <52A83273.4020409@dfki.de> Hello, is there already a link to the minutes document with agenda and dial-in numbers? Torsten Am 12/11/2013 9:56 AM, schrieb Marti Christof (mach): > Sorry. I am stuck in important meeting which got delayed and have to postpone our call for about 30 minutes. > > I will open the bridge at 10:30. > > Best regards > Christof > ---- > InIT Cloud Computing Lab - ICCLab http://cloudcomp.ch > Institut of Applied Information Technology - InIT > Zurich University of Applied Sciences - ZHAW > School of Engineering > Phone: +41 58 934 70 63 > Skype: christof-marti > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-miwi mailing list > Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi Am 12/11/2013 9:56 AM, schrieb Marti Christof (mach): > Sorry. I am stuck in important meeting which got delayed and have to postpone our call for about 30 minutes. > > I will open the bridge at 10:30. > > Best regards > Christof > ---- > InIT Cloud Computing Lab - ICCLab http://cloudcomp.ch > Institut of Applied Information Technology - InIT > Zurich University of Applied Sciences - ZHAW > School of Engineering > Phone: +41 58 934 70 63 > Skype: christof-marti > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-miwi mailing list > Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi From mach at zhaw.ch Wed Dec 11 10:39:58 2013 From: mach at zhaw.ch (Christof Marti) Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 10:39:58 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-miwi] meeting agenda/minutes Message-ID: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WKRjnGcsA3T2Bv5UIntQcVS5Mwx6u5bfgMFu4bXDJtY/edit# From toni at playsign.net Wed Dec 11 11:18:42 2013 From: toni at playsign.net (Toni Alatalo) Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 12:18:42 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-miwi] Fwd: glTF Three.js loader status & plans? References: Message-ID: Just for info: mr. Parisi said he will upgrade the three.js glTF loader shortly and didn?t seem to need help with that so we?ll just wait for that now and test it then. In the meantime we?ll continue work on other areas (now sync & 3dui integration and basic client feats continues) and on the glTF side test animations and materials with the plain glTF viewer. ~Toni Begin forwarded message: > From: Tony Parisi > Subject: Re: glTF Three.js loader status & plans? > Date: 10 Dec 2013 23:05:28 GMT+2 > To: Toni Alatalo > Cc: tapani at playsign.net, Erno Kuusela , Fabrice Robinet > > Hi Toni and team, > > I am finishing up the glTF loader over the next few weeks. There was a big syntax change about a month ago, and I need to catch up with that. I also need to add morphs. Then it's essentially feature complete. Once that is done, I will merge it into trunk, and also set up a Three.js pull request so that Mr.doob can include it with the Three.js distro. That's the general plan. > > It's totally OK to add an issue to the glTF Github. We like doing that! > > Fabrice, my working group chair, cc'ed here. > > Tony > > > > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 4:35 AM, Toni Alatalo wrote: > Hi, > > may I ask what?s the status of the Three.js glTF loader and your plans for it? > > We do know the info that?s out there on the web, your presentation about the status at the SF WebGL meetup in August etc. Also what the github log says :) > > So, more specifically: what version of the glTF spec / converter should we use with the current Three loader? The example files in the branch say ?0.1.0? which I think basically means that some version from before the converter got the nice feature that it puts the exact git version hash in the json files. So far we have been unable to get any own data converted so that it would work with the three.js loader. We tried with an old version of the converter from spring, the last one that still puts the hardcoded ?0.1.0? versioning, but it crashed on our test scene (later versions of the converter work for that file). > > We have been able to convert our test scene with the version of the converter that the plain webgl-glTF viewer works with, that test is online at http://playsign.tklapp.com:8000/glTF-webgl-viewer/ (the default ?Oulu? model, takes a while to load). However we?d like to move on to testing with three.js as that?s our target for actual use ? and also to test animations etc. Was thinking it would be good to proceed by testing first with the kind of data your loader should already work with. > > If things look good and it makes sense regarding your plans etc. we can then perhaps help with the effort ? for example start porting the loader to the current version of the spec / converter if that?s needed. We are doing this work here at Playsign for the open source realxtend.org platform with funding from the EU Future Internet (FI) effort. We have no need to keep any work nor communications secret, I just didn?t know a public forum to post this to. I like how Three.js uses the github issue tracker almost like a forum and it seems to be in good use for glTF too ? I just didn?t want to blindly hijack that for this three.js loader specific talk without knowing about your practices. If it?s good to open an issue in the main glTF tracker instead of talking here please do / hint us and we'll do so. > > Cheers, > ~Toni > > > > > -- > Tony Parisi tparisi at gmail.com > CTO at Large 415.902.8002 > Skype auradeluxe > Follow me on Twitter! http://twitter.com/auradeluxe > Read my blog at http://www.tonyparisi.com/ > Learn WebGL http://learningwebgl.com/ > > Read my book! WebGL, Up and Running > http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920024729.do > http://www.amazon.com/dp/144932357X > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tomi.sarni at cyberlightning.com Thu Dec 12 12:49:07 2013 From: tomi.sarni at cyberlightning.com (Tomi Sarni) Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 13:49:07 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-miwi] Real Virtual Interaction Review comments fixed Message-ID: Hey all, just to let you know that Arto Heikkinen delivered review comments and that the documents have been changed accordingly. FYI i've also recently update the original open specifications and API parts. Most signinificant part is the RESTful data format used to transport data from sensors to application developers enabling DOM integration of sensor events to web pages, although due to limitations of the scope of this project there is not really good demo out there about this. For instance it could have been nice to add html form button on the Three.js/POI demo to a particular POI element (based on GPS) that would for instance turn on/off a light switch in that particular POI in real life. -- Tomi Sarni Software Engineer Cyberlightning Ltd. email. tomi.sarni at cyberlightning.com Go to www.cybersli.de and enrich your presentations! www.cyberlightning.com This e-mail and all attached material are confidential and may contain legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail from your system without producing, distributing or retaining copies thereof. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jarkko at cyberlightning.com Fri Dec 13 15:05:50 2013 From: jarkko at cyberlightning.com (Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila) Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 16:05:50 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-miwi] Fwd: [Fiware] Delivery Awareness - Update In-Reply-To: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90B8914E5B1@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> References: <65CDBE2E7E5A964BB8BC5F4328FDE90B8914E5B1@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: Hello, What does it mean our Open Specification delivery is red? Did not we deliver those back then?? - jarkko ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: MANUEL ESCRICHE VICENTE Date: Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 4:03 PM Subject: [Fiware] Delivery Awareness - Update To: "fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu" Dear Partners, Let me inform you that D1.2.5 has been delivered today. In addition to the delayed deliverables, marked in red, let me bring to your attention the great number of deliverables due by the end of January. Although they are about 45 days away, considering end-of-year holidays there isn?t much time available since we have to reserve some time for Quality Assurance activities as well Therefore, let me ask you to address due tasks to meet these objectives in time. Full report available at: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/3210/FIWARE.DeliveryAwareness.20131213.xlsx Kind regards, Manuel ---------------------------- Manuel Escriche Vicente Agile Project Manager/Leader FI-WARE Initiative Telef?nica Digital Parque Tecnol?gico C/ Abraham Zacuto, 10 47151 - Boecillo Valladolid - Spain Tfno: +34.91.312.99.72 Fax: +34.983.36.75.64 http://www.tid.es ------------------------------ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware mailing list Fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware -- Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila VP, Technology Cyberlightning Ltd. mobile. +358 405245142 email. jarkko at cyberlightning.com Go to www.cybersli.de and enrich your presentations! www.cyberlightning.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.png Type: image/png Size: 93843 bytes Desc: not available URL: From toni at playsign.net Sat Dec 14 14:54:33 2013 From: toni at playsign.net (Toni Alatalo) Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 15:54:33 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-miwi] miwi GE infos (Fwd: [Fiware] QUITE IMPORTANT AND URGENT: RE: GEs to discuss in the review meeting) References: <52AB72ED.9040600@tid.es> Message-ID: <9AED604A-EDCC-4CBF-A3F4-88DA91DC703C@playsign.net> Was just wondering about this ? is this simply due to WP13 GEs not having been part of any official fi-ware release yet? Or is something missing about the status of our GEs? Many of them are already available in work-in-progress pre-release mode, on github. Just wanted to mention Christof that if you need help in gathering MIWI GE status, links to the source codes and info about commercial exploitation etc. we can quite easily do that. And demo links ofc. For example, CIEs POI backend: GE is available from https://github.com/Chiru/WeX/tree/master/poi and live demo at http://chiru.cie.fi/FI-WARE/demos/POI/map_demo/ etc. for almost all MIWI GEs. But right now I?m afraid that info is not gathered anywhere (that demo link for what the guys showed at the F2F I asked and got by private email) ? would be good to have in the wiki in any case I figure. Cheers, ~Toni Begin forwarded message: > From: Juanjo Hierro > Subject: [Fiware] QUITE IMPORTANT AND URGENT: RE: GEs to discuss in the review meeting > Date: 13 Dec 2013 22:49:49 GMT+2 > To: "fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu" > > Dear FI-WARE GEi owners, > > We have got a very clear response from our PO, Arian Zweger, about what are the concrete GEis which are going to be particularly questioned during the month 30 project review next week. > > Please react accordingly so that: > you provide your WPL the necessary information that will allow him to answer any potential question at the review; or > let us know INMEDIATELY whether you will attend the meeting personally, as to be able to respond any questions directly > Note that, regarding the first set of GEis, Arian mentions that the EC and reviewers wish to explore whether it is worthwhile to continue funding development. > > Some questions that I wouldn't be surprised if the PO/reviewers make: > > What are your commercial plans around the GEis beyond the FI-PPP ? > (for those cases were the GEi is not being offered as open source): what are the FRAND terms under which you plan to deliver your GEi beyond the FI-PPP ? > If you are not involved in any proposal focused on continuation of the Technology Foundation (FI-WARE) ... how do you plan to provide lab support of your GEi to SMEs in phase 3 or even UC projects in phase 2 trials ? How doy you plan to provide level 1 and 2 support of you GEi if deployed on FI-Lab ? > Besides this, there are a number of questions regarding GEis in several chapters that WPLs/WPAs should prepare a response for. > > For those who didn't follow the details about the next month 30 project review, these are the logistics: > > Reharsal: Rehearsal: 16-17/Dec. Telef?nica?s office (Avenue des Arts, 20).The meeting will start at 11:15-12:00 on Monday. > Review: 18th December 2013, avenue de Beaulieu BU25 0/S2 > agenda of the review:https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AmxBgS-lWT4vdDB6NXJzMHVubDg1Zko5VG5BbzAzSnc#gid=0 > > Best regards, > > -- Juanjo Hierro > > P.D.: A note about the list below ... apartently, the DCA GEi was in the list because of an inconsistent message in the catalogue (it was mentioned that the product was going to be licensed as open source while at the same time it was stated that it could be used under certain terms and conditions). This has already been fixed. > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website: www.tid.es > email: jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator > and Chief Architect > > FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website: http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: RE: GEs to discuss in the review meeting > Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 14:33:44 +0000 > From: > To: > CC: , > > > Dear Miguel, > > As requested, please find a list below. > > The question for the first group is whether it is worthwhile to continue funding development of: > - Data Chapter > - Compressed Domain Video Analysis, Codoan / Siemens > - Metadata Preprocessing, MetadataProcessor / Siemens > - Media-enhanced Query Broker, QueryBroker / Siemens > - Apps Chapter > - (Service Composition, Ericsson Composition Editor (ECE) / Ericsson) > - Service Mashup, Mashup Factory / DT > - Mediator, Mediator_TI / Telecom Italia > - IoT Chapter > - (Backend) Configuration Management, IoT Discovery - UNIS > - (Backend) IoT Broker, IoT Broker - NEC > - (Backend) Device Management, IDAS DCA - TID > - (Gateway) Protocol Adapter, ZPA / Telecom Italia / EPCGE / Orange > - Security Chapter > - Security Monitoring / Android Vulnerability Assessment, Ovaldroid / Inria > - Identity Management, GCP / DT > - Identity Management, One-IDM / NSN > - Identity Management, DigitalSelf / NSN > - Malware Detection Service (Opt), Morphus / Inria > - I2ND Chapter > - Cloud Proxy > - (I2ND) Network Information and Control (NetIC-VNP), Altoclient/ALU-D > - (I2ND) Network Information and Control (NetIC-OFNIC), VNP/NSN > - (I2ND) Network Information and Control (NetIC-altoclient), VNEIC/ALU-I > - (I2ND) Service Connectivity Capability and Control (S3C), S3C / DT > - Tools > - Trace Analyzer, IBM Israel > > Then there are specific questions for the second group: > - Cloud Chapter > - Why having a DCRM by IBM and one by Intel? Differences? > - Object Storage GEi by IBM:?? Status? > - Edgelets Manager by Thales: not in the Catalogue? > - Data Chapter > - UDA ? unstructured data analysis by ATOS?? Status? > - Apps Chapter > - Relation Mediator_TI by Telecom Italia and SETHA2 by Thales? > - IoT Chapter > - (Gateway) Device Management, Gateway Device Management / Franhoufer: not in the Catalogue? > - Test and evaluation server environment for NGSI by SAP?? Status? > - Template Handler by SAP?? Status? > - Security Chapter > - KeyRock by UPM?? Status? > - Access Proxy by UPM?? Status? > - MiWi Chapter > - Where are Advanced Middleware, 2D-UI, 3D-UI, Synchronization, Cloud Rendering, Display as a Service, GIS Data Provider, POI Data Provider, 2D-3D-Capture, Augmented Reality, Real-Virtual Interaction, Virtual Character, Interface Designer? Status? > > Best regards, > Arian > > > > > > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > _______________________________________________ > Fiware mailing list > Fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Philipp.Slusallek at dfki.de Sun Dec 15 07:43:14 2013 From: Philipp.Slusallek at dfki.de (Philipp Slusallek) Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 07:43:14 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-miwi] miwi GE infos (Fwd: [Fiware] QUITE IMPORTANT AND URGENT: RE: GEs to discuss in the review meeting) In-Reply-To: <9AED604A-EDCC-4CBF-A3F4-88DA91DC703C@playsign.net> References: <52AB72ED.9040600@tid.es> <9AED604A-EDCC-4CBF-A3F4-88DA91DC703C@playsign.net> Message-ID: <52AD4F82.7010303@dfki.de> Hi Toni, all, I and Juanjo were at the Architecture Board meeting in Madrid Thu/Fri when that message arrived and did briefly talk about it. Here is my perspective based on the discussion with Juanjo: It is not a major issue. The point is listed last and we assume that Arian is just wondering when the GEs will become available as there is little information on this available yet (as discussed before). However, there are a few things that we should do: -- Put together a list of our GEs that will be ready for the January release. Please all respond as quickly as possible by email, maybe we can set up a document somewhere where we can collect the information. -- For GEs that will not be ready for January we should have a good explanation. -- This list should be sent to Juanjo on Monday (before their review on Tuesday) !! -- As agreed with Christof we need to push for information being made publicly available on FI-WARE Wiki and need to put them in the FI-WARE Catalog as well. -- GEs should also be available on FI-LAB. There they will only be accepted on FI-LAB when their quality is high enough. We need to make sure it is. This also requires setting up blueprints (at least for SEs that need to be installed on a server, which can also mean Web server + JS libraries). Best, Philipp Am 14.12.2013 14:54, schrieb Toni Alatalo: > Was just wondering about this ? is this simply due to WP13 GEs not > having been part of any official fi-ware release yet? > > Or is something missing about the status of our GEs? Many of them are > already available in work-in-progress pre-release mode, on github. Just > wanted to mention Christof that if you need help in gathering MIWI GE > status, links to the source codes and info about commercial exploitation > etc. we can quite easily do that. And demo links ofc. > > For example, CIEs POI backend: > GE is available from https://github.com/Chiru/WeX/tree/master/poi > and live demo at http://chiru.cie.fi/FI-WARE/demos/POI/map_demo/ > > etc. for almost all MIWI GEs. But right now I?m afraid that info is not > gathered anywhere (that demo link for what the guys showed at the F2F I > asked and got by private email) ? would be good to have in the wiki in > any case I figure. > > Cheers, > ~Toni > > Begin forwarded message: > >> *From: *Juanjo Hierro > >> *Subject: **[Fiware] QUITE IMPORTANT AND URGENT: RE: GEs to discuss in >> the review meeting* >> *Date: *13 Dec 2013 22:49:49 GMT+2 >> *To: *"fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu " >> > >> >> Dear FI-WARE GEi owners, >> >> We have got a very clear response from our PO, Arian Zweger, about >> what are the concrete GEis which are going to be particularly >> questioned during the month 30 project review next week. >> >> Please react accordingly so that: >> >> * you provide your WPL the necessary information that will allow him >> to answer any potential question at the review; or >> * let us know INMEDIATELY whether you will attend the meeting >> personally, as to be able to respond any questions directly >> >> Note that, regarding the first set of GEis, Arian mentions that the >> EC and reviewers wish to explore whether it is worthwhile to continue >> funding development. >> >> Some questions that I wouldn't be surprised if the PO/reviewers make: >> >> * What are your commercial plans around the GEis beyond the FI-PPP ? >> * (for those cases were the GEi is not being offered as open >> source): what are the FRAND terms under which you plan to deliver >> your GEi beyond the FI-PPP ? >> * If you are not involved in any proposal focused on continuation of >> the Technology Foundation (FI-WARE) ... how do you plan to provide >> lab support of your GEi to SMEs in phase 3 or even UC projects in >> phase 2 trials ? How doy you plan to provide level 1 and 2 >> support of you GEi if deployed on FI-Lab ? >> >> Besides this, there are a number of questions regarding GEis in >> several chapters that WPLs/WPAs should prepare a response for. >> >> For those who didn't follow the details about the next month 30 >> project review, these are the logistics: >> >> Reharsal: Rehearsal: 16-17/Dec. Telef?nica?s office (Avenue des >> Arts, 20).The meeting will start at 11:15-12:00 on Monday. >> Review: 18^th December 2013, avenue de Beaulieu BU25 0/S2 >> agenda of the >> review:https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AmxBgS-lWT4vdDB6NXJzMHVubDg1Zko5VG5BbzAzSnc#gid=0 >> >> Best regards, >> >> -- Juanjo Hierro >> >> P.D.: A note about the list below ... apartently, the DCA GEi was in >> the list because of an inconsistent message in the catalogue (it was >> mentioned that the product was going to be licensed as open source >> while at the same time it was stated that it could be used under >> certain terms and conditions). This has already been fixed. >> >> ------------- >> Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital >> website:www.tid.es >> email:jhierro at tid.es >> twitter:twitter.com/JuanjoHierro >> >> FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator >> and Chief Architect >> >> FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman >> >> You can follow FI-WARE at: >> website:http://www.fi-ware.eu >> facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 >> twitter:http://twitter.com/FIware >> linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 >> >> >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: RE: GEs to discuss in the review meeting >> Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 14:33:44 +0000 >> From: >> To: >> CC: , >> >> >> >> Dear Miguel, >> >> As requested, please find a list below. >> >> The question for the first group is*whether it is worthwhile to >> continue funding development of:* >> - Data Chapter >> - Compressed Domain Video Analysis, Codoan / Siemens >> - Metadata Preprocessing, MetadataProcessor / Siemens >> - Media-enhanced Query Broker, QueryBroker / Siemens >> - Apps Chapter >> - (Service Composition, Ericsson Composition Editor >> (ECE) / Ericsson) >> - Service Mashup, Mashup Factory / DT >> - Mediator, Mediator_TI / Telecom Italia >> - IoT Chapter >> - (Backend) Configuration Management, IoT Discovery - UNIS >> - (Backend) IoT Broker, IoT Broker - NEC >> - (Backend) Device Management, IDAS DCA - TID >> - (Gateway) Protocol Adapter, ZPA / Telecom Italia / >> EPCGE / Orange >> - Security Chapter >> - Security Monitoring / Android Vulnerability >> Assessment, Ovaldroid / Inria >> - Identity Management, GCP / DT >> - Identity Management, One-IDM / NSN >> - Identity Management, DigitalSelf / NSN >> - Malware Detection Service (Opt), Morphus / Inria >> - I2ND Chapter >> - Cloud Proxy >> - (I2ND) Network Information and Control (NetIC-VNP), >> Altoclient/ALU-D >> - (I2ND) Network Information and Control >> (NetIC-OFNIC), VNP/NSN >> - (I2ND) Network Information and Control >> (NetIC-altoclient), VNEIC/ALU-I >> - (I2ND) Service Connectivity Capability and Control >> (S3C), S3C / DT >> - Tools >> - Trace Analyzer, IBM Israel >> >> Then there are*specific questions*for the second group: >> - Cloud Chapter >> - Why having a DCRM by IBM and one by Intel? Differences? >> - Object Storage GEi by IBM:?? Status? >> - Edgelets Manager by Thales: not in the Catalogue? >> - Data Chapter >> - UDA ? unstructured data analysis by ATOS?? Status? >> - Apps Chapter >> - Relation Mediator_TI by Telecom Italia and SETHA2 by >> Thales? >> - IoT Chapter >> - (Gateway) Device Management, Gateway Device >> Management / Franhoufer: not in the Catalogue? >> - Test and evaluation server environment for NGSI by >> SAP?? Status? >> - Template Handler by SAP?? Status? >> - Security Chapter >> - KeyRock by UPM?? Status? >> - Access Proxy by UPM?? Status? >> - MiWi Chapter >> - Where are Advanced Middleware, 2D-UI, 3D-UI, >> Synchronization, Cloud Rendering, Display as a Service, GIS Data >> Provider, POI Data Provider, 2D-3D-Capture, Augmented Reality, >> Real-Virtual Interaction, Virtual Character, Interface Designer? Status? >> >> Best regards, >> Arian >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede >> consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico >> en el enlace situado m?s abajo. >> This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send >> and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: >> http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx >> _______________________________________________ >> Fiware mailing list >> Fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu >> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware > > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-miwi mailing list > Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi > -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Deutsches Forschungszentrum f?r K?nstliche Intelligenz (DFKI) GmbH Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern Gesch?ftsf?hrung: Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender) Dr. Walter Olthoff Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes Sitz der Gesellschaft: Kaiserslautern (HRB 2313) USt-Id.Nr.: DE 148646973, Steuernummer: 19/673/0060/3 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: slusallek.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 441 bytes Desc: not available URL: From Philipp.Slusallek at dfki.de Sun Dec 15 07:48:04 2013 From: Philipp.Slusallek at dfki.de (Philipp Slusallek) Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 07:48:04 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-miwi] miwi GE infos (Fwd: [Fiware] QUITE IMPORTANT AND URGENT: RE: GEs to discuss in the review meeting) In-Reply-To: <52AD4F82.7010303@dfki.de> References: <52AB72ED.9040600@tid.es> <9AED604A-EDCC-4CBF-A3F4-88DA91DC703C@playsign.net> <52AD4F82.7010303@dfki.de> Message-ID: <52AD50A4.4090903@dfki.de> Hi, a quick correction: The review is actually on Wednesday. But still we should provide the input ideally on Monday as they are having their preparation meeting on Mon/Tue and so they can act on it before the review. Best, Philipp Am 15.12.2013 07:43, schrieb Philipp Slusallek: > Hi Toni, all, > > I and Juanjo were at the Architecture Board meeting in Madrid Thu/Fri > when that message arrived and did briefly talk about it. > > Here is my perspective based on the discussion with Juanjo: It is not a > major issue. The point is listed last and we assume that Arian is just > wondering when the GEs will become available as there is little > information on this available yet (as discussed before). > > > However, there are a few things that we should do: > > -- Put together a list of our GEs that will be ready for the January > release. Please all respond as quickly as possible by email, maybe we > can set up a document somewhere where we can collect the information. > > -- For GEs that will not be ready for January we should have a good > explanation. > > -- This list should be sent to Juanjo on Monday (before their review on > Tuesday) !! > > -- As agreed with Christof we need to push for information being made > publicly available on FI-WARE Wiki and need to put them in the FI-WARE > Catalog as well. > > -- GEs should also be available on FI-LAB. There they will only be > accepted on FI-LAB when their quality is high enough. We need to make > sure it is. This also requires setting up blueprints (at least for SEs > that need to be installed on a server, which can also mean Web server + > JS libraries). > > > Best, > > Philipp > > Am 14.12.2013 14:54, schrieb Toni Alatalo: >> Was just wondering about this ? is this simply due to WP13 GEs not >> having been part of any official fi-ware release yet? >> >> Or is something missing about the status of our GEs? Many of them are >> already available in work-in-progress pre-release mode, on github. Just >> wanted to mention Christof that if you need help in gathering MIWI GE >> status, links to the source codes and info about commercial exploitation >> etc. we can quite easily do that. And demo links ofc. >> >> For example, CIEs POI backend: >> GE is available from https://github.com/Chiru/WeX/tree/master/poi >> and live demo at http://chiru.cie.fi/FI-WARE/demos/POI/map_demo/ >> >> etc. for almost all MIWI GEs. But right now I?m afraid that info is not >> gathered anywhere (that demo link for what the guys showed at the F2F I >> asked and got by private email) ? would be good to have in the wiki in >> any case I figure. >> >> Cheers, >> ~Toni >> >> Begin forwarded message: >> >>> *From: *Juanjo Hierro > >>> *Subject: **[Fiware] QUITE IMPORTANT AND URGENT: RE: GEs to discuss in >>> the review meeting* >>> *Date: *13 Dec 2013 22:49:49 GMT+2 >>> *To: *"fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu " >>> > >>> >>> Dear FI-WARE GEi owners, >>> >>> We have got a very clear response from our PO, Arian Zweger, about >>> what are the concrete GEis which are going to be particularly >>> questioned during the month 30 project review next week. >>> >>> Please react accordingly so that: >>> >>> * you provide your WPL the necessary information that will allow him >>> to answer any potential question at the review; or >>> * let us know INMEDIATELY whether you will attend the meeting >>> personally, as to be able to respond any questions directly >>> >>> Note that, regarding the first set of GEis, Arian mentions that the >>> EC and reviewers wish to explore whether it is worthwhile to continue >>> funding development. >>> >>> Some questions that I wouldn't be surprised if the PO/reviewers make: >>> >>> * What are your commercial plans around the GEis beyond the FI-PPP ? >>> * (for those cases were the GEi is not being offered as open >>> source): what are the FRAND terms under which you plan to deliver >>> your GEi beyond the FI-PPP ? >>> * If you are not involved in any proposal focused on continuation of >>> the Technology Foundation (FI-WARE) ... how do you plan to provide >>> lab support of your GEi to SMEs in phase 3 or even UC projects in >>> phase 2 trials ? How doy you plan to provide level 1 and 2 >>> support of you GEi if deployed on FI-Lab ? >>> >>> Besides this, there are a number of questions regarding GEis in >>> several chapters that WPLs/WPAs should prepare a response for. >>> >>> For those who didn't follow the details about the next month 30 >>> project review, these are the logistics: >>> >>> Reharsal: Rehearsal: 16-17/Dec. Telef?nica?s office (Avenue des >>> Arts, 20).The meeting will start at 11:15-12:00 on Monday. >>> Review: 18^th December 2013, avenue de Beaulieu BU25 0/S2 >>> agenda of the >>> >>> review:https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AmxBgS-lWT4vdDB6NXJzMHVubDg1Zko5VG5BbzAzSnc#gid=0 >>> >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> -- Juanjo Hierro >>> >>> P.D.: A note about the list below ... apartently, the DCA GEi was in >>> the list because of an inconsistent message in the catalogue (it was >>> mentioned that the product was going to be licensed as open source >>> while at the same time it was stated that it could be used under >>> certain terms and conditions). This has already been fixed. >>> >>> ------------- >>> Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital >>> website:www.tid.es >>> email:jhierro at tid.es >>> twitter:twitter.com/JuanjoHierro >>> >>> FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator >>> and Chief Architect >>> >>> FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman >>> >>> You can follow FI-WARE at: >>> website:http://www.fi-ware.eu >>> facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 >>> twitter:http://twitter.com/FIware >>> linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 >>> >>> >>> -------- Original Message -------- >>> Subject: RE: GEs to discuss in the review meeting >>> Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 14:33:44 +0000 >>> From: >>> To: >>> CC: , >>> >>> >>> >>> Dear Miguel, >>> >>> As requested, please find a list below. >>> >>> The question for the first group is*whether it is worthwhile to >>> continue funding development of:* >>> - Data Chapter >>> - Compressed Domain Video Analysis, Codoan / Siemens >>> - Metadata Preprocessing, MetadataProcessor / Siemens >>> - Media-enhanced Query Broker, QueryBroker / Siemens >>> - Apps Chapter >>> - (Service Composition, Ericsson Composition Editor >>> (ECE) / Ericsson) >>> - Service Mashup, Mashup Factory / DT >>> - Mediator, Mediator_TI / Telecom Italia >>> - IoT Chapter >>> - (Backend) Configuration Management, IoT Discovery - >>> UNIS >>> - (Backend) IoT Broker, IoT Broker - NEC >>> - (Backend) Device Management, IDAS DCA - TID >>> - (Gateway) Protocol Adapter, ZPA / Telecom Italia / >>> EPCGE / Orange >>> - Security Chapter >>> - Security Monitoring / Android Vulnerability >>> Assessment, Ovaldroid / Inria >>> - Identity Management, GCP / DT >>> - Identity Management, One-IDM / NSN >>> - Identity Management, DigitalSelf / NSN >>> - Malware Detection Service (Opt), Morphus / Inria >>> - I2ND Chapter >>> - Cloud Proxy >>> - (I2ND) Network Information and Control (NetIC-VNP), >>> Altoclient/ALU-D >>> - (I2ND) Network Information and Control >>> (NetIC-OFNIC), VNP/NSN >>> - (I2ND) Network Information and Control >>> (NetIC-altoclient), VNEIC/ALU-I >>> - (I2ND) Service Connectivity Capability and Control >>> (S3C), S3C / DT >>> - Tools >>> - Trace Analyzer, IBM Israel >>> >>> Then there are*specific questions*for the second group: >>> - Cloud Chapter >>> - Why having a DCRM by IBM and one by Intel? >>> Differences? >>> - Object Storage GEi by IBM:?? Status? >>> - Edgelets Manager by Thales: not in the Catalogue? >>> - Data Chapter >>> - UDA ? unstructured data analysis by ATOS?? Status? >>> - Apps Chapter >>> - Relation Mediator_TI by Telecom Italia and SETHA2 by >>> Thales? >>> - IoT Chapter >>> - (Gateway) Device Management, Gateway Device >>> Management / Franhoufer: not in the Catalogue? >>> - Test and evaluation server environment for NGSI by >>> SAP?? Status? >>> - Template Handler by SAP?? Status? >>> - Security Chapter >>> - KeyRock by UPM?? Status? >>> - Access Proxy by UPM?? Status? >>> - MiWi Chapter >>> - Where are Advanced Middleware, 2D-UI, 3D-UI, >>> Synchronization, Cloud Rendering, Display as a Service, GIS Data >>> Provider, POI Data Provider, 2D-3D-Capture, Augmented Reality, >>> Real-Virtual Interaction, Virtual Character, Interface Designer? Status? >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Arian >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede >>> consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico >>> en el enlace situado m?s abajo. >>> This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send >>> and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: >>> http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Fiware mailing list >>> Fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu >>> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Fiware-miwi mailing list >> Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu >> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi >> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-miwi mailing list > Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi > -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Deutsches Forschungszentrum f?r K?nstliche Intelligenz (DFKI) GmbH Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern Gesch?ftsf?hrung: Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender) Dr. Walter Olthoff Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes Sitz der Gesellschaft: Kaiserslautern (HRB 2313) USt-Id.Nr.: DE 148646973, Steuernummer: 19/673/0060/3 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: slusallek.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 441 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jarkko at cyberlightning.com Sun Dec 15 12:01:12 2013 From: jarkko at cyberlightning.com (Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila) Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 13:01:12 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-miwi] miwi GE infos (Fwd: [Fiware] QUITE IMPORTANT AND URGENT: RE: GEs to discuss in the review meeting) In-Reply-To: <52AD4F82.7010303@dfki.de> References: <52AB72ED.9040600@tid.es> <9AED604A-EDCC-4CBF-A3F4-88DA91DC703C@playsign.net> <52AD4F82.7010303@dfki.de> Message-ID: All, Please correct me now if I am wrong, but all the requested information is already available! So, the question is: what exactly is still missing? You all know what is in the Open Specification. Up to this date, they are as ready as they can be. We are having tracker, and feature sets, and we have scheduled the development. From the schedule it can be seen that everything what we plan is going to be ready in January, with minor issues being patched after it. There are also installation and user guides. At least on behalf of Cyber and CIE, those are up to date and collectively already describe everything required. To emphasize: those guides already make a number of references to github source code repositories (which is allowed) and we already have a number of demos online and they are collectively described in one place. This place is now in the "interim payment" document, which contains demo links from Cyber and Playsign. Other parties did not deliver anything for it. So, given this, in my opinion the only thing we might be lacking is the collective list of demo links in Wiki. Obviously the interim report is not enough (since it is not public), and hence it should be published somewhere in the Wiki. Other thing we are missing still is the FI-LAB components. Those will come together with January release, in one form or another. Am I missing something? :) Maybe the other thing we need to be collectively doing, is a summarizing report of the progress, of which naturally contains a summary of the current Wiki status. - jarkko On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 8:43 AM, Philipp Slusallek < Philipp.Slusallek at dfki.de> wrote: > Hi Toni, all, > > I and Juanjo were at the Architecture Board meeting in Madrid Thu/Fri when > that message arrived and did briefly talk about it. > > Here is my perspective based on the discussion with Juanjo: It is not a > major issue. The point is listed last and we assume that Arian is just > wondering when the GEs will become available as there is little information > on this available yet (as discussed before). > > > However, there are a few things that we should do: > > -- Put together a list of our GEs that will be ready for the January > release. Please all respond as quickly as possible by email, maybe we can > set up a document somewhere where we can collect the information. > > -- For GEs that will not be ready for January we should have a good > explanation. > > -- This list should be sent to Juanjo on Monday (before their review on > Tuesday) !! > > -- As agreed with Christof we need to push for information being made > publicly available on FI-WARE Wiki and need to put them in the FI-WARE > Catalog as well. > > -- GEs should also be available on FI-LAB. There they will only be > accepted on FI-LAB when their quality is high enough. We need to make sure > it is. This also requires setting up blueprints (at least for SEs that need > to be installed on a server, which can also mean Web server + JS libraries). > > > Best, > > Philipp > > Am 14.12.2013 14:54, schrieb Toni Alatalo: > >> Was just wondering about this ? is this simply due to WP13 GEs not >> having been part of any official fi-ware release yet? >> >> Or is something missing about the status of our GEs? Many of them are >> already available in work-in-progress pre-release mode, on github. Just >> wanted to mention Christof that if you need help in gathering MIWI GE >> status, links to the source codes and info about commercial exploitation >> etc. we can quite easily do that. And demo links ofc. >> >> For example, CIEs POI backend: >> GE is available from https://github.com/Chiru/WeX/tree/master/poi >> and live demo at http://chiru.cie.fi/FI-WARE/demos/POI/map_demo/ >> >> etc. for almost all MIWI GEs. But right now I?m afraid that info is not >> gathered anywhere (that demo link for what the guys showed at the F2F I >> asked and got by private email) ? would be good to have in the wiki in >> any case I figure. >> >> Cheers, >> ~Toni >> >> Begin forwarded message: >> >> *From: *Juanjo Hierro > >>> *Subject: **[Fiware] QUITE IMPORTANT AND URGENT: RE: GEs to discuss in >>> the review meeting* >>> *Date: *13 Dec 2013 22:49:49 GMT+2 >>> *To: *"fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu " >>> > >>> >>> >>> Dear FI-WARE GEi owners, >>> >>> We have got a very clear response from our PO, Arian Zweger, about >>> what are the concrete GEis which are going to be particularly >>> questioned during the month 30 project review next week. >>> >>> Please react accordingly so that: >>> >>> * you provide your WPL the necessary information that will allow him >>> >>> to answer any potential question at the review; or >>> * let us know INMEDIATELY whether you will attend the meeting >>> >>> personally, as to be able to respond any questions directly >>> >>> Note that, regarding the first set of GEis, Arian mentions that the >>> EC and reviewers wish to explore whether it is worthwhile to continue >>> funding development. >>> >>> Some questions that I wouldn't be surprised if the PO/reviewers make: >>> >>> * What are your commercial plans around the GEis beyond the FI-PPP ? >>> * (for those cases were the GEi is not being offered as open >>> >>> source): what are the FRAND terms under which you plan to deliver >>> your GEi beyond the FI-PPP ? >>> * If you are not involved in any proposal focused on continuation of >>> >>> the Technology Foundation (FI-WARE) ... how do you plan to provide >>> lab support of your GEi to SMEs in phase 3 or even UC projects in >>> phase 2 trials ? How doy you plan to provide level 1 and 2 >>> support of you GEi if deployed on FI-Lab ? >>> >>> Besides this, there are a number of questions regarding GEis in >>> several chapters that WPLs/WPAs should prepare a response for. >>> >>> For those who didn't follow the details about the next month 30 >>> project review, these are the logistics: >>> >>> Reharsal: Rehearsal: 16-17/Dec. Telef?nica?s office (Avenue des >>> Arts, 20).The meeting will start at 11:15-12:00 on Monday. >>> Review: 18^th December 2013, avenue de Beaulieu BU25 0/S2 >>> >>> agenda of the >>> review:https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AmxBgS- >>> lWT4vdDB6NXJzMHVubDg1Zko5VG5BbzAzSnc#gid=0 >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> -- Juanjo Hierro >>> >>> P.D.: A note about the list below ... apartently, the DCA GEi was in >>> the list because of an inconsistent message in the catalogue (it was >>> mentioned that the product was going to be licensed as open source >>> while at the same time it was stated that it could be used under >>> certain terms and conditions). This has already been fixed. >>> >>> ------------- >>> Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital >>> website:www.tid.es >>> email:jhierro at tid.es >>> twitter:twitter.com/JuanjoHierro >>> >>> >>> FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator >>> and Chief Architect >>> >>> FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman >>> >>> You can follow FI-WARE at: >>> website:http://www.fi-ware.eu >>> facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 >>> twitter:http://twitter.com/FIware >>> linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 >>> >>> >>> -------- Original Message -------- >>> Subject: RE: GEs to discuss in the review meeting >>> Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 14:33:44 +0000 >>> From: >>> To: >>> CC: , >>> >>> >>> >>> Dear Miguel, >>> >>> As requested, please find a list below. >>> >>> The question for the first group is*whether it is worthwhile to >>> continue funding development of:* >>> >>> - Data Chapter >>> - Compressed Domain Video Analysis, Codoan / Siemens >>> - Metadata Preprocessing, MetadataProcessor / Siemens >>> - Media-enhanced Query Broker, QueryBroker / Siemens >>> - Apps Chapter >>> - (Service Composition, Ericsson Composition Editor >>> (ECE) / Ericsson) >>> - Service Mashup, Mashup Factory / DT >>> - Mediator, Mediator_TI / Telecom Italia >>> - IoT Chapter >>> - (Backend) Configuration Management, IoT Discovery - >>> UNIS >>> - (Backend) IoT Broker, IoT Broker - NEC >>> - (Backend) Device Management, IDAS DCA - TID >>> - (Gateway) Protocol Adapter, ZPA / Telecom Italia / >>> EPCGE / Orange >>> - Security Chapter >>> - Security Monitoring / Android Vulnerability >>> Assessment, Ovaldroid / Inria >>> - Identity Management, GCP / DT >>> - Identity Management, One-IDM / NSN >>> - Identity Management, DigitalSelf / NSN >>> - Malware Detection Service (Opt), Morphus / Inria >>> - I2ND Chapter >>> - Cloud Proxy >>> - (I2ND) Network Information and Control (NetIC-VNP), >>> Altoclient/ALU-D >>> - (I2ND) Network Information and Control >>> (NetIC-OFNIC), VNP/NSN >>> - (I2ND) Network Information and Control >>> (NetIC-altoclient), VNEIC/ALU-I >>> - (I2ND) Service Connectivity Capability and Control >>> (S3C), S3C / DT >>> - Tools >>> - Trace Analyzer, IBM Israel >>> >>> Then there are*specific questions*for the second group: >>> >>> - Cloud Chapter >>> - Why having a DCRM by IBM and one by Intel? Differences? >>> - Object Storage GEi by IBM:?? Status? >>> - Edgelets Manager by Thales: not in the Catalogue? >>> - Data Chapter >>> - UDA ? unstructured data analysis by ATOS?? Status? >>> - Apps Chapter >>> - Relation Mediator_TI by Telecom Italia and SETHA2 by >>> Thales? >>> - IoT Chapter >>> - (Gateway) Device Management, Gateway Device >>> Management / Franhoufer: not in the Catalogue? >>> - Test and evaluation server environment for NGSI by >>> SAP?? Status? >>> - Template Handler by SAP?? Status? >>> - Security Chapter >>> - KeyRock by UPM?? Status? >>> - Access Proxy by UPM?? Status? >>> - MiWi Chapter >>> - Where are Advanced Middleware, 2D-UI, 3D-UI, >>> Synchronization, Cloud Rendering, Display as a Service, GIS Data >>> Provider, POI Data Provider, 2D-3D-Capture, Augmented Reality, >>> Real-Virtual Interaction, Virtual Character, Interface Designer? Status? >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Arian >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> >>> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede >>> consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico >>> en el enlace situado m?s abajo. >>> This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send >>> and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: >>> http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Fiware mailing list >>> Fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu >>> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware >>> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Fiware-miwi mailing list >> Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu >> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi >> >> > > -- > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Deutsches Forschungszentrum f?r K?nstliche Intelligenz (DFKI) GmbH > Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern > > Gesch?ftsf?hrung: > Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender) > Dr. Walter Olthoff > Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: > Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes > > Sitz der Gesellschaft: Kaiserslautern (HRB 2313) > USt-Id.Nr.: DE 148646973, Steuernummer: 19/673/0060/3 > ------------------------------------------------------------ > --------------- > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-miwi mailing list > Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi > > -- Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila VP, Technology Cyberlightning Ltd. mobile. +358 405245142 email. jarkko at cyberlightning.com Go to www.cybersli.de and enrich your presentations! www.cyberlightning.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Philipp.Slusallek at dfki.de Sun Dec 15 14:48:31 2013 From: Philipp.Slusallek at dfki.de (Philipp Slusallek) Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 14:48:31 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-miwi] miwi GE infos (Fwd: [Fiware] QUITE IMPORTANT AND URGENT: RE: GEs to discuss in the review meeting) In-Reply-To: References: <52AB72ED.9040600@tid.es> <9AED604A-EDCC-4CBF-A3F4-88DA91DC703C@playsign.net> <52AD4F82.7010303@dfki.de> Message-ID: <52ADB32F.3020700@dfki.de> Hi all, Am 15.12.2013 12:01, schrieb Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila: > Please correct me now if I am wrong, but all the requested information > is already available! Yes and No. Here is my view again in some more detail: -- The Open Specification are in the private Wiki, but not in the public one, which means that the commission could in principle see them, but likely will not find them (unless we tell them, which we should do :-). Putting your report on a (public Wiki) may be a good starting point for this. -- Outside of FI-WARE or the commission (e.g. use-case projects, general public) the Open Spec will not be seen at all. We need to move it to the Public Wiki. At the AB meeting on Fri I specifically asked Juanjo to speed up this process, as our stuff has been ready for many weeks now and people keep asking for it. -- At the end the commission and the public will be mainly looking at the FI-WARE catalog. Our stuff only gets in there if it fulfills certain quality criteria. The most important ones are the quality of all the other documentation we are preparing right now, including software and examples to test things out, T&C, etc. -- For the FI-LAB catalog we also need the Blueprints for automatic installation. This is mandatory for server-based components but I suggest that we also provide them for client-based software by requesting a Web-server blueprint (probably available already) and deploying the SW and examples to it. Christof, feel free to correct me or add things I missed. Thanks, Philipp > You all know what is in the Open Specification. Up to this date, they > are as ready as they can be. We are having tracker, and feature sets, > and we have scheduled the development. From the schedule it can be seen > that everything what we plan is going to be ready in January, with minor > issues being patched after it. There are also installation and user > guides. At least on behalf of Cyber and CIE, those are up to date and > collectively already describe everything required. To emphasize: those > guides already make a number of references to github source code > repositories (which is allowed) and we already have a number of demos > online and they are collectively described in one place. This place is > now in the "interim payment" document, which contains demo links from > Cyber and Playsign. Other parties did not deliver anything for it. > > So, given this, in my opinion the only thing we might be lacking is the > collective list of demo links in Wiki. Obviously the interim report is > not enough (since it is not public), and hence it should be published > somewhere in the Wiki. > > Other thing we are missing still is the FI-LAB components. Those will > come together with January release, in one form or another. > > Am I missing something? :) Maybe the other thing we need to be > collectively doing, is a summarizing report of the progress, of which > naturally contains a summary of the current Wiki status. > > - jarkko > > > > On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 8:43 AM, Philipp Slusallek > > wrote: > > Hi Toni, all, > > I and Juanjo were at the Architecture Board meeting in Madrid > Thu/Fri when that message arrived and did briefly talk about it. > > Here is my perspective based on the discussion with Juanjo: It is > not a major issue. The point is listed last and we assume that Arian > is just wondering when the GEs will become available as there is > little information on this available yet (as discussed before). > > > However, there are a few things that we should do: > > -- Put together a list of our GEs that will be ready for the January > release. Please all respond as quickly as possible by email, maybe > we can set up a document somewhere where we can collect the information. > > -- For GEs that will not be ready for January we should have a good > explanation. > > -- This list should be sent to Juanjo on Monday (before their review > on Tuesday) !! > > -- As agreed with Christof we need to push for information being > made publicly available on FI-WARE Wiki and need to put them in the > FI-WARE Catalog as well. > > -- GEs should also be available on FI-LAB. There they will only be > accepted on FI-LAB when their quality is high enough. We need to > make sure it is. This also requires setting up blueprints (at least > for SEs that need to be installed on a server, which can also mean > Web server + JS libraries). > > > Best, > > Philipp > > Am 14.12.2013 14:54, schrieb Toni Alatalo: > > Was just wondering about this ? is this simply due to WP13 GEs not > having been part of any official fi-ware release yet? > > Or is something missing about the status of our GEs? Many of > them are > already available in work-in-progress pre-release mode, on > github. Just > wanted to mention Christof that if you need help in gathering > MIWI GE > status, links to the source codes and info about commercial > exploitation > etc. we can quite easily do that. And demo links ofc. > > For example, CIEs POI backend: > GE is available from > https://github.com/Chiru/WeX/__tree/master/poi > > and live demo at > http://chiru.cie.fi/FI-WARE/__demos/POI/map_demo/ > > > etc. for almost all MIWI GEs. But right now I?m afraid that info > is not > gathered anywhere (that demo link for what the guys showed at > the F2F I > asked and got by private email) ? would be good to have in the > wiki in > any case I figure. > > Cheers, > ~Toni > > Begin forwarded message: > > *From: *Juanjo Hierro >> > *Subject: **[Fiware] QUITE IMPORTANT AND URGENT: RE: GEs to > discuss in > the review meeting* > *Date: *13 Dec 2013 22:49:49 GMT+2 > *To: *"fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu > > >" > > >> > > > Dear FI-WARE GEi owners, > > We have got a very clear response from our PO, Arian > Zweger, about > what are the concrete GEis which are going to be particularly > questioned during the month 30 project review next week. > > Please react accordingly so that: > > * you provide your WPL the necessary information that > will allow him > > to answer any potential question at the review; or > * let us know INMEDIATELY whether you will attend the meeting > > personally, as to be able to respond any questions directly > > Note that, regarding the first set of GEis, Arian > mentions that the > EC and reviewers wish to explore whether it is worthwhile to > continue > funding development. > > Some questions that I wouldn't be surprised if the > PO/reviewers make: > > * What are your commercial plans around the GEis beyond > the FI-PPP ? > * (for those cases were the GEi is not being offered as open > > source): what are the FRAND terms under which you plan > to deliver > your GEi beyond the FI-PPP ? > * If you are not involved in any proposal focused on > continuation of > > the Technology Foundation (FI-WARE) ... how do you plan > to provide > lab support of your GEi to SMEs in phase 3 or even UC > projects in > phase 2 trials ? How doy you plan to provide level 1 > and 2 > support of you GEi if deployed on FI-Lab ? > > Besides this, there are a number of questions regarding > GEis in > several chapters that WPLs/WPAs should prepare a response for. > > For those who didn't follow the details about the next > month 30 > project review, these are the logistics: > > Reharsal: Rehearsal: 16-17/Dec. Telef?nica?s office > (Avenue des > Arts, 20).The meeting will start at 11:15-12:00 on Monday. > Review: 18^th December 2013, avenue de Beaulieu BU25 0/S2 > > agenda of the > > review:https://docs.google.__com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=__0AmxBgS-__lWT4vdDB6NXJzMHVubDg1Zko5VG5Bb__zAzSnc#gid=0 > > > Best regards, > > -- Juanjo Hierro > > P.D.: A note about the list below ... apartently, the DCA > GEi was in > the list because of an inconsistent message in the catalogue > (it was > mentioned that the product was going to be licensed as open > source > while at the same time it was stated that it could be used under > certain terms and conditions). This has already been fixed. > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website:www.tid.es > email:jhierro at tid.es > twitter:twitter.com/__JuanjoHierro > > > > > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator > and Chief Architect > > FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website:http://www.fi-ware.eu > > facebook:http://www.facebook.__com/pages/FI-WARE/__251366491587242 > twitter:http://twitter.com/__FIware > > linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.__com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: RE: GEs to discuss in the review meeting > Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 14:33:44 +0000 > From: > > To: > > CC: >, > > > > > Dear Miguel, > > As requested, please find a list below. > > The question for the first group is*whether it is worthwhile to > continue funding development of:* > > - Data Chapter > - Compressed Domain Video Analysis, Codoan > / Siemens > - Metadata Preprocessing, MetadataProcessor > / Siemens > - Media-enhanced Query Broker, QueryBroker > / Siemens > - Apps Chapter > - (Service Composition, Ericsson > Composition Editor > (ECE) / Ericsson) > - Service Mashup, Mashup Factory / DT > - Mediator, Mediator_TI / Telecom Italia > - IoT Chapter > - (Backend) Configuration Management, IoT > Discovery - UNIS > - (Backend) IoT Broker, IoT Broker - NEC > - (Backend) Device Management, IDAS DCA - TID > - (Gateway) Protocol Adapter, ZPA / Telecom > Italia / > EPCGE / Orange > - Security Chapter > - Security Monitoring / Android Vulnerability > Assessment, Ovaldroid / Inria > - Identity Management, GCP / DT > - Identity Management, One-IDM / NSN > - Identity Management, DigitalSelf / NSN > - Malware Detection Service (Opt), Morphus > / Inria > - I2ND Chapter > - Cloud Proxy > - (I2ND) Network Information and Control > (NetIC-VNP), > Altoclient/ALU-D > - (I2ND) Network Information and Control > (NetIC-OFNIC), VNP/NSN > - (I2ND) Network Information and Control > (NetIC-altoclient), VNEIC/ALU-I > - (I2ND) Service Connectivity Capability > and Control > (S3C), S3C / DT > - Tools > - Trace Analyzer, IBM Israel > > Then there are*specific questions*for the second group: > > - Cloud Chapter > - Why having a DCRM by IBM and one by > Intel? Differences? > - Object Storage GEi by IBM:?? Status? > - Edgelets Manager by Thales: not in the > Catalogue? > - Data Chapter > - UDA ? unstructured data analysis by > ATOS?? Status? > - Apps Chapter > - Relation Mediator_TI by Telecom Italia > and SETHA2 by > Thales? > - IoT Chapter > - (Gateway) Device Management, Gateway Device > Management / Franhoufer: not in the Catalogue? > - Test and evaluation server environment > for NGSI by > SAP?? Status? > - Template Handler by SAP?? Status? > - Security Chapter > - KeyRock by UPM?? Status? > - Access Proxy by UPM?? Status? > - MiWi Chapter > - Where are Advanced Middleware, 2D-UI, 3D-UI, > Synchronization, Cloud Rendering, Display as a Service, GIS Data > Provider, POI Data Provider, 2D-3D-Capture, Augmented Reality, > Real-Virtual Interaction, Virtual Character, Interface > Designer? Status? > > Best regards, > Arian > > > > ------------------------------__------------------------------__------------ > > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede > consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo > electr?nico > en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We > only send > and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/__disclaimer.aspx > > _________________________________________________ > Fiware mailing list > Fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu > > > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/__listinfo/fiware > > > > > > _________________________________________________ > Fiware-miwi mailing list > Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/__listinfo/fiware-miwi > > > > > -- > > ------------------------------__------------------------------__------------- > Deutsches Forschungszentrum f?r K?nstliche Intelligenz (DFKI) GmbH > Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern > > Gesch?ftsf?hrung: > Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender) > Dr. Walter Olthoff > Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: > Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes > > Sitz der Gesellschaft: Kaiserslautern (HRB 2313) > USt-Id.Nr.: DE 148646973, Steuernummer: 19/673/0060/3 > ------------------------------__------------------------------__--------------- > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-miwi mailing list > Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi > > > > > -- > Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila > VP, Technology > Cyberlightning Ltd. > > mobile. +358 405245142 > email. jarkko at cyberlightning.com > > Go to www.cybersli.de and enrich your > presentations! > > www.cyberlightning.com -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Deutsches Forschungszentrum f?r K?nstliche Intelligenz (DFKI) GmbH Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern Gesch?ftsf?hrung: Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender) Dr. Walter Olthoff Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes Sitz der Gesellschaft: Kaiserslautern (HRB 2313) USt-Id.Nr.: DE 148646973, Steuernummer: 19/673/0060/3 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: slusallek.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 441 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mcp at tid.es Mon Dec 16 00:58:25 2013 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 00:58:25 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-miwi] miwi GE infos (Fwd: [Fiware] QUITE IMPORTANT AND URGENT: RE: GEs to discuss in the review meeting) In-Reply-To: <52ADB32F.3020700@dfki.de> References: <52AB72ED.9040600@tid.es> <9AED604A-EDCC-4CBF-A3F4-88DA91DC703C@playsign.net> <52AD4F82.7010303@dfki.de> <52ADB32F.3020700@dfki.de> Message-ID: <0D6323B5-0108-455A-8C68-387A23535044@tid.es> Sorry to break in the list but things are diverting too much from the procedures common to all WP. The private wiki "does not exist" and mustn't be mentioned to the EC and the reviewers. Philipp, you can say that you have "internal drafts " or whatever, but never ever that there is private project or a private wiki. Let me be clear. WP13 has not submited their open specs for internal review. I asked for his a number of times in the last weeks with no luck. You can publish this once approved, but not without prior approval. And we cannot approve something that the wpl does not signal as ready for review! I will not interfere in the internal matters of wp13 but let us be fair. Best regards, Miguel Enviado desde mi iPad > El 15/12/2013, a las 14:48, Philipp Slusallek escribi?: > > Hi all, > > Am 15.12.2013 12:01, schrieb Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila: >> Please correct me now if I am wrong, but all the requested information >> is already available! > > Yes and No. Here is my view again in some more detail: > > -- The Open Specification are in the private Wiki, but not in the public one, which means that the commission could in principle see them, but likely will not find them (unless we tell them, which we should do :-). Putting your report on a (public Wiki) may be a good starting point for this. > > -- Outside of FI-WARE or the commission (e.g. use-case projects, general public) the Open Spec will not be seen at all. We need to move it to the Public Wiki. At the AB meeting on Fri I specifically asked Juanjo to speed up this process, as our stuff has been ready for many weeks now and people keep asking for it. > > -- At the end the commission and the public will be mainly looking at the FI-WARE catalog. Our stuff only gets in there if it fulfills certain quality criteria. The most important ones are the quality of all the other documentation we are preparing right now, including software and examples to test things out, T&C, etc. > > -- For the FI-LAB catalog we also need the Blueprints for automatic installation. This is mandatory for server-based components but I suggest that we also provide them for client-based software by requesting a Web-server blueprint (probably available already) and deploying the SW and examples to it. > > Christof, feel free to correct me or add things I missed. > > > Thanks, > > Philipp > >> You all know what is in the Open Specification. Up to this date, they >> are as ready as they can be. We are having tracker, and feature sets, >> and we have scheduled the development. From the schedule it can be seen >> that everything what we plan is going to be ready in January, with minor >> issues being patched after it. There are also installation and user >> guides. At least on behalf of Cyber and CIE, those are up to date and >> collectively already describe everything required. To emphasize: those >> guides already make a number of references to github source code >> repositories (which is allowed) and we already have a number of demos >> online and they are collectively described in one place. This place is >> now in the "interim payment" document, which contains demo links from >> Cyber and Playsign. Other parties did not deliver anything for it. >> >> So, given this, in my opinion the only thing we might be lacking is the >> collective list of demo links in Wiki. Obviously the interim report is >> not enough (since it is not public), and hence it should be published >> somewhere in the Wiki. >> >> Other thing we are missing still is the FI-LAB components. Those will >> come together with January release, in one form or another. >> >> Am I missing something? :) Maybe the other thing we need to be >> collectively doing, is a summarizing report of the progress, of which >> naturally contains a summary of the current Wiki status. >> >> - jarkko >> >> >> >> On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 8:43 AM, Philipp Slusallek >> > wrote: >> >> Hi Toni, all, >> >> I and Juanjo were at the Architecture Board meeting in Madrid >> Thu/Fri when that message arrived and did briefly talk about it. >> >> Here is my perspective based on the discussion with Juanjo: It is >> not a major issue. The point is listed last and we assume that Arian >> is just wondering when the GEs will become available as there is >> little information on this available yet (as discussed before). >> >> >> However, there are a few things that we should do: >> >> -- Put together a list of our GEs that will be ready for the January >> release. Please all respond as quickly as possible by email, maybe >> we can set up a document somewhere where we can collect the information. >> >> -- For GEs that will not be ready for January we should have a good >> explanation. >> >> -- This list should be sent to Juanjo on Monday (before their review >> on Tuesday) !! >> >> -- As agreed with Christof we need to push for information being >> made publicly available on FI-WARE Wiki and need to put them in the >> FI-WARE Catalog as well. >> >> -- GEs should also be available on FI-LAB. There they will only be >> accepted on FI-LAB when their quality is high enough. We need to >> make sure it is. This also requires setting up blueprints (at least >> for SEs that need to be installed on a server, which can also mean >> Web server + JS libraries). >> >> >> Best, >> >> Philipp >> >> Am 14.12.2013 14:54, schrieb Toni Alatalo: >> >> Was just wondering about this ? is this simply due to WP13 GEs not >> having been part of any official fi-ware release yet? >> >> Or is something missing about the status of our GEs? Many of >> them are >> already available in work-in-progress pre-release mode, on >> github. Just >> wanted to mention Christof that if you need help in gathering >> MIWI GE >> status, links to the source codes and info about commercial >> exploitation >> etc. we can quite easily do that. And demo links ofc. >> >> For example, CIEs POI backend: >> GE is available from >> https://github.com/Chiru/WeX/__tree/master/poi >> >> and live demo at >> http://chiru.cie.fi/FI-WARE/__demos/POI/map_demo/ >> >> >> etc. for almost all MIWI GEs. But right now I?m afraid that info >> is not >> gathered anywhere (that demo link for what the guys showed at >> the F2F I >> asked and got by private email) ? would be good to have in the >> wiki in >> any case I figure. >> >> Cheers, >> ~Toni >> >> Begin forwarded message: >> >> *From: *Juanjo Hierro > > >> >> *Subject: **[Fiware] QUITE IMPORTANT AND URGENT: RE: GEs to >> discuss in >> the review meeting* >> *Date: *13 Dec 2013 22:49:49 GMT+2 >> *To: *"fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu >> >> > >" >> >> > >> >> >> >> Dear FI-WARE GEi owners, >> >> We have got a very clear response from our PO, Arian >> Zweger, about >> what are the concrete GEis which are going to be particularly >> questioned during the month 30 project review next week. >> >> Please react accordingly so that: >> >> * you provide your WPL the necessary information that >> will allow him >> >> to answer any potential question at the review; or >> * let us know INMEDIATELY whether you will attend the meeting >> >> personally, as to be able to respond any questions directly >> >> Note that, regarding the first set of GEis, Arian >> mentions that the >> EC and reviewers wish to explore whether it is worthwhile to >> continue >> funding development. >> >> Some questions that I wouldn't be surprised if the >> PO/reviewers make: >> >> * What are your commercial plans around the GEis beyond >> the FI-PPP ? >> * (for those cases were the GEi is not being offered as open >> >> source): what are the FRAND terms under which you plan >> to deliver >> your GEi beyond the FI-PPP ? >> * If you are not involved in any proposal focused on >> continuation of >> >> the Technology Foundation (FI-WARE) ... how do you plan >> to provide >> lab support of your GEi to SMEs in phase 3 or even UC >> projects in >> phase 2 trials ? How doy you plan to provide level 1 >> and 2 >> support of you GEi if deployed on FI-Lab ? >> >> Besides this, there are a number of questions regarding >> GEis in >> several chapters that WPLs/WPAs should prepare a response for. >> >> For those who didn't follow the details about the next >> month 30 >> project review, these are the logistics: >> >> Reharsal: Rehearsal: 16-17/Dec. Telef?nica?s office >> (Avenue des >> Arts, 20).The meeting will start at 11:15-12:00 on Monday. >> Review: 18^th December 2013, avenue de Beaulieu BU25 0/S2 >> >> agenda of the >> >> review:https://docs.google.__com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=__0AmxBgS-__lWT4vdDB6NXJzMHVubDg1Zko5VG5Bb__zAzSnc#gid=0 >> >> >> Best regards, >> >> -- Juanjo Hierro >> >> P.D.: A note about the list below ... apartently, the DCA >> GEi was in >> the list because of an inconsistent message in the catalogue >> (it was >> mentioned that the product was going to be licensed as open >> source >> while at the same time it was stated that it could be used under >> certain terms and conditions). This has already been fixed. >> >> ------------- >> Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital >> website:www.tid.es >> email:jhierro at tid.es >> twitter:twitter.com/__JuanjoHierro >> >> > > >> >> >> FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator >> and Chief Architect >> >> FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman >> >> You can follow FI-WARE at: >> website:http://www.fi-ware.eu >> >> facebook:http://www.facebook.__com/pages/FI-WARE/__251366491587242 >> twitter:http://twitter.com/__FIware >> >> linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.__com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 >> >> >> >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: RE: GEs to discuss in the review meeting >> Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 14:33:44 +0000 >> From: > > >> To: > >> CC: > >,> > >> >> >> >> Dear Miguel, >> >> As requested, please find a list below. >> >> The question for the first group is*whether it is worthwhile to >> continue funding development of:* >> >> - Data Chapter >> - Compressed Domain Video Analysis, Codoan >> / Siemens >> - Metadata Preprocessing, MetadataProcessor >> / Siemens >> - Media-enhanced Query Broker, QueryBroker >> / Siemens >> - Apps Chapter >> - (Service Composition, Ericsson >> Composition Editor >> (ECE) / Ericsson) >> - Service Mashup, Mashup Factory / DT >> - Mediator, Mediator_TI / Telecom Italia >> - IoT Chapter >> - (Backend) Configuration Management, IoT >> Discovery - UNIS >> - (Backend) IoT Broker, IoT Broker - NEC >> - (Backend) Device Management, IDAS DCA - TID >> - (Gateway) Protocol Adapter, ZPA / Telecom >> Italia / >> EPCGE / Orange >> - Security Chapter >> - Security Monitoring / Android Vulnerability >> Assessment, Ovaldroid / Inria >> - Identity Management, GCP / DT >> - Identity Management, One-IDM / NSN >> - Identity Management, DigitalSelf / NSN >> - Malware Detection Service (Opt), Morphus >> / Inria >> - I2ND Chapter >> - Cloud Proxy >> - (I2ND) Network Information and Control >> (NetIC-VNP), >> Altoclient/ALU-D >> - (I2ND) Network Information and Control >> (NetIC-OFNIC), VNP/NSN >> - (I2ND) Network Information and Control >> (NetIC-altoclient), VNEIC/ALU-I >> - (I2ND) Service Connectivity Capability >> and Control >> (S3C), S3C / DT >> - Tools >> - Trace Analyzer, IBM Israel >> >> Then there are*specific questions*for the second group: >> >> - Cloud Chapter >> - Why having a DCRM by IBM and one by >> Intel? Differences? >> - Object Storage GEi by IBM:?? Status? >> - Edgelets Manager by Thales: not in the >> Catalogue? >> - Data Chapter >> - UDA ? unstructured data analysis by >> ATOS?? Status? >> - Apps Chapter >> - Relation Mediator_TI by Telecom Italia >> and SETHA2 by >> Thales? >> - IoT Chapter >> - (Gateway) Device Management, Gateway Device >> Management / Franhoufer: not in the Catalogue? >> - Test and evaluation server environment >> for NGSI by >> SAP?? Status? >> - Template Handler by SAP?? Status? >> - Security Chapter >> - KeyRock by UPM?? Status? >> - Access Proxy by UPM?? Status? >> - MiWi Chapter >> - Where are Advanced Middleware, 2D-UI, 3D-UI, >> Synchronization, Cloud Rendering, Display as a Service, GIS Data >> Provider, POI Data Provider, 2D-3D-Capture, Augmented Reality, >> Real-Virtual Interaction, Virtual Character, Interface >> Designer? Status? >> >> Best regards, >> Arian >> >> >> >> ------------------------------__------------------------------__------------ >> >> >> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede >> consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo >> electr?nico >> en el enlace situado m?s abajo. >> This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We >> only send >> and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: >> http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/__disclaimer.aspx >> >> _________________________________________________ >> Fiware mailing list >> Fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu >> > > >> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/__listinfo/fiware >> >> >> >> >> >> _________________________________________________ >> Fiware-miwi mailing list >> Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu >> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/__listinfo/fiware-miwi >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> ------------------------------__------------------------------__------------- >> Deutsches Forschungszentrum f?r K?nstliche Intelligenz (DFKI) GmbH >> Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern >> >> Gesch?ftsf?hrung: >> Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender) >> Dr. Walter Olthoff >> Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: >> Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes >> >> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Kaiserslautern (HRB 2313) >> USt-Id.Nr.: DE 148646973, Steuernummer: 19/673/0060/3 >> ------------------------------__------------------------------__--------------- >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Fiware-miwi mailing list >> Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu >> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila >> VP, Technology >> Cyberlightning Ltd. >> >> mobile. +358 405245142 >> email. jarkko at cyberlightning.com >> >> Go to www.cybersli.de and enrich your >> presentations! >> >> www.cyberlightning.com > > > -- > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Deutsches Forschungszentrum f?r K?nstliche Intelligenz (DFKI) GmbH > Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern > > Gesch?ftsf?hrung: > Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender) > Dr. Walter Olthoff > Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: > Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes > > Sitz der Gesellschaft: Kaiserslautern (HRB 2313) > USt-Id.Nr.: DE 148646973, Steuernummer: 19/673/0060/3 > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-miwi mailing list > Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx From Philipp.Slusallek at dfki.de Mon Dec 16 05:44:49 2013 From: Philipp.Slusallek at dfki.de (Philipp Slusallek) Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 05:44:49 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-miwi] miwi GE infos (Fwd: [Fiware] QUITE IMPORTANT AND URGENT: RE: GEs to discuss in the review meeting) In-Reply-To: <0D6323B5-0108-455A-8C68-387A23535044@tid.es> References: <52AB72ED.9040600@tid.es> <9AED604A-EDCC-4CBF-A3F4-88DA91DC703C@playsign.net> <52AD4F82.7010303@dfki.de> <52ADB32F.3020700@dfki.de> <0D6323B5-0108-455A-8C68-387A23535044@tid.es> Message-ID: <52AE8541.1060409@dfki.de> Hi Miguel, Sorry, but our stuff has been ready for review for a long time now, so that am very surprised that you say that it has not even been submitted. I even asked Juanjo at the AB meeting why the review and publishing takes so long. Christof? I am not familiar with the official procedures, but you find the documents at http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/WP13_Integration#OpenSpecification_.26_Architecture_Pages At least the architecture descriptions have been ready for many weeks, while the other documentation should be mostly complete by now as well (did not attend the last weekly call). Miguel, Christof, maybe we can generate a document today that contains the documentation and that can be shown to the reviewers if they ask. We should be able to point to something at least, even if it is not reviewed yet. Best, Philipp Am 16.12.2013 00:58, schrieb Miguel Carrillo: > Sorry to break in the list but things are diverting too much from the procedures common to all WP. > > The private wiki "does not exist" and mustn't be mentioned to the EC and the reviewers. Philipp, you can say that you have "internal drafts " or whatever, but never ever that there is private project or a private wiki. > > Let me be clear. WP13 has not submited their open specs for internal review. I asked for his a number of times in the last weeks with no luck. You can publish this once approved, but not without prior approval. And we cannot approve something that the wpl does not signal as ready for review! > > I will not interfere in the internal matters of wp13 but let us be fair. > > Best regards, > > Miguel > > Enviado desde mi iPad > >> El 15/12/2013, a las 14:48, Philipp Slusallek escribi?: >> >> Hi all, >> >> Am 15.12.2013 12:01, schrieb Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila: >>> Please correct me now if I am wrong, but all the requested information >>> is already available! >> >> Yes and No. Here is my view again in some more detail: >> >> -- The Open Specification are in the private Wiki, but not in the public one, which means that the commission could in principle see them, but likely will not find them (unless we tell them, which we should do :-). Putting your report on a (public Wiki) may be a good starting point for this. >> >> -- Outside of FI-WARE or the commission (e.g. use-case projects, general public) the Open Spec will not be seen at all. We need to move it to the Public Wiki. At the AB meeting on Fri I specifically asked Juanjo to speed up this process, as our stuff has been ready for many weeks now and people keep asking for it. >> >> -- At the end the commission and the public will be mainly looking at the FI-WARE catalog. Our stuff only gets in there if it fulfills certain quality criteria. The most important ones are the quality of all the other documentation we are preparing right now, including software and examples to test things out, T&C, etc. >> >> -- For the FI-LAB catalog we also need the Blueprints for automatic installation. This is mandatory for server-based components but I suggest that we also provide them for client-based software by requesting a Web-server blueprint (probably available already) and deploying the SW and examples to it. >> >> Christof, feel free to correct me or add things I missed. >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Philipp >> >>> You all know what is in the Open Specification. Up to this date, they >>> are as ready as they can be. We are having tracker, and feature sets, >>> and we have scheduled the development. From the schedule it can be seen >>> that everything what we plan is going to be ready in January, with minor >>> issues being patched after it. There are also installation and user >>> guides. At least on behalf of Cyber and CIE, those are up to date and >>> collectively already describe everything required. To emphasize: those >>> guides already make a number of references to github source code >>> repositories (which is allowed) and we already have a number of demos >>> online and they are collectively described in one place. This place is >>> now in the "interim payment" document, which contains demo links from >>> Cyber and Playsign. Other parties did not deliver anything for it. >>> >>> So, given this, in my opinion the only thing we might be lacking is the >>> collective list of demo links in Wiki. Obviously the interim report is >>> not enough (since it is not public), and hence it should be published >>> somewhere in the Wiki. >>> >>> Other thing we are missing still is the FI-LAB components. Those will >>> come together with January release, in one form or another. >>> >>> Am I missing something? :) Maybe the other thing we need to be >>> collectively doing, is a summarizing report of the progress, of which >>> naturally contains a summary of the current Wiki status. >>> >>> - jarkko >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 8:43 AM, Philipp Slusallek >>> > wrote: >>> >>> Hi Toni, all, >>> >>> I and Juanjo were at the Architecture Board meeting in Madrid >>> Thu/Fri when that message arrived and did briefly talk about it. >>> >>> Here is my perspective based on the discussion with Juanjo: It is >>> not a major issue. The point is listed last and we assume that Arian >>> is just wondering when the GEs will become available as there is >>> little information on this available yet (as discussed before). >>> >>> >>> However, there are a few things that we should do: >>> >>> -- Put together a list of our GEs that will be ready for the January >>> release. Please all respond as quickly as possible by email, maybe >>> we can set up a document somewhere where we can collect the information. >>> >>> -- For GEs that will not be ready for January we should have a good >>> explanation. >>> >>> -- This list should be sent to Juanjo on Monday (before their review >>> on Tuesday) !! >>> >>> -- As agreed with Christof we need to push for information being >>> made publicly available on FI-WARE Wiki and need to put them in the >>> FI-WARE Catalog as well. >>> >>> -- GEs should also be available on FI-LAB. There they will only be >>> accepted on FI-LAB when their quality is high enough. We need to >>> make sure it is. This also requires setting up blueprints (at least >>> for SEs that need to be installed on a server, which can also mean >>> Web server + JS libraries). >>> >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Philipp >>> >>> Am 14.12.2013 14:54, schrieb Toni Alatalo: >>> >>> Was just wondering about this ? is this simply due to WP13 GEs not >>> having been part of any official fi-ware release yet? >>> >>> Or is something missing about the status of our GEs? Many of >>> them are >>> already available in work-in-progress pre-release mode, on >>> github. Just >>> wanted to mention Christof that if you need help in gathering >>> MIWI GE >>> status, links to the source codes and info about commercial >>> exploitation >>> etc. we can quite easily do that. And demo links ofc. >>> >>> For example, CIEs POI backend: >>> GE is available from >>> https://github.com/Chiru/WeX/__tree/master/poi >>> >>> and live demo at >>> http://chiru.cie.fi/FI-WARE/__demos/POI/map_demo/ >>> >>> >>> etc. for almost all MIWI GEs. But right now I?m afraid that info >>> is not >>> gathered anywhere (that demo link for what the guys showed at >>> the F2F I >>> asked and got by private email) ? would be good to have in the >>> wiki in >>> any case I figure. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> ~Toni >>> >>> Begin forwarded message: >>> >>> *From: *Juanjo Hierro >> >> >> >>> *Subject: **[Fiware] QUITE IMPORTANT AND URGENT: RE: GEs to >>> discuss in >>> the review meeting* >>> *Date: *13 Dec 2013 22:49:49 GMT+2 >>> *To: *"fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu >>> >>> >> >" >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >>> Dear FI-WARE GEi owners, >>> >>> We have got a very clear response from our PO, Arian >>> Zweger, about >>> what are the concrete GEis which are going to be particularly >>> questioned during the month 30 project review next week. >>> >>> Please react accordingly so that: >>> >>> * you provide your WPL the necessary information that >>> will allow him >>> >>> to answer any potential question at the review; or >>> * let us know INMEDIATELY whether you will attend the meeting >>> >>> personally, as to be able to respond any questions directly >>> >>> Note that, regarding the first set of GEis, Arian >>> mentions that the >>> EC and reviewers wish to explore whether it is worthwhile to >>> continue >>> funding development. >>> >>> Some questions that I wouldn't be surprised if the >>> PO/reviewers make: >>> >>> * What are your commercial plans around the GEis beyond >>> the FI-PPP ? >>> * (for those cases were the GEi is not being offered as open >>> >>> source): what are the FRAND terms under which you plan >>> to deliver >>> your GEi beyond the FI-PPP ? >>> * If you are not involved in any proposal focused on >>> continuation of >>> >>> the Technology Foundation (FI-WARE) ... how do you plan >>> to provide >>> lab support of your GEi to SMEs in phase 3 or even UC >>> projects in >>> phase 2 trials ? How doy you plan to provide level 1 >>> and 2 >>> support of you GEi if deployed on FI-Lab ? >>> >>> Besides this, there are a number of questions regarding >>> GEis in >>> several chapters that WPLs/WPAs should prepare a response for. >>> >>> For those who didn't follow the details about the next >>> month 30 >>> project review, these are the logistics: >>> >>> Reharsal: Rehearsal: 16-17/Dec. Telef?nica?s office >>> (Avenue des >>> Arts, 20).The meeting will start at 11:15-12:00 on Monday. >>> Review: 18^th December 2013, avenue de Beaulieu BU25 0/S2 >>> >>> agenda of the >>> >>> review:https://docs.google.__com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=__0AmxBgS-__lWT4vdDB6NXJzMHVubDg1Zko5VG5Bb__zAzSnc#gid=0 >>> >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> -- Juanjo Hierro >>> >>> P.D.: A note about the list below ... apartently, the DCA >>> GEi was in >>> the list because of an inconsistent message in the catalogue >>> (it was >>> mentioned that the product was going to be licensed as open >>> source >>> while at the same time it was stated that it could be used under >>> certain terms and conditions). This has already been fixed. >>> >>> ------------- >>> Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital >>> website:www.tid.es >>> email:jhierro at tid.es >>> twitter:twitter.com/__JuanjoHierro >>> >>> >> > >>> >>> >>> FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator >>> and Chief Architect >>> >>> FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman >>> >>> You can follow FI-WARE at: >>> website:http://www.fi-ware.eu >>> >>> facebook:http://www.facebook.__com/pages/FI-WARE/__251366491587242 >>> twitter:http://twitter.com/__FIware >>> >>> linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.__com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 >>> >>> >>> >>> -------- Original Message -------- >>> Subject: RE: GEs to discuss in the review meeting >>> Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 14:33:44 +0000 >>> From: >> > >>> To: > >>> CC: >> >,>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> Dear Miguel, >>> >>> As requested, please find a list below. >>> >>> The question for the first group is*whether it is worthwhile to >>> continue funding development of:* >>> >>> - Data Chapter >>> - Compressed Domain Video Analysis, Codoan >>> / Siemens >>> - Metadata Preprocessing, MetadataProcessor >>> / Siemens >>> - Media-enhanced Query Broker, QueryBroker >>> / Siemens >>> - Apps Chapter >>> - (Service Composition, Ericsson >>> Composition Editor >>> (ECE) / Ericsson) >>> - Service Mashup, Mashup Factory / DT >>> - Mediator, Mediator_TI / Telecom Italia >>> - IoT Chapter >>> - (Backend) Configuration Management, IoT >>> Discovery - UNIS >>> - (Backend) IoT Broker, IoT Broker - NEC >>> - (Backend) Device Management, IDAS DCA - TID >>> - (Gateway) Protocol Adapter, ZPA / Telecom >>> Italia / >>> EPCGE / Orange >>> - Security Chapter >>> - Security Monitoring / Android Vulnerability >>> Assessment, Ovaldroid / Inria >>> - Identity Management, GCP / DT >>> - Identity Management, One-IDM / NSN >>> - Identity Management, DigitalSelf / NSN >>> - Malware Detection Service (Opt), Morphus >>> / Inria >>> - I2ND Chapter >>> - Cloud Proxy >>> - (I2ND) Network Information and Control >>> (NetIC-VNP), >>> Altoclient/ALU-D >>> - (I2ND) Network Information and Control >>> (NetIC-OFNIC), VNP/NSN >>> - (I2ND) Network Information and Control >>> (NetIC-altoclient), VNEIC/ALU-I >>> - (I2ND) Service Connectivity Capability >>> and Control >>> (S3C), S3C / DT >>> - Tools >>> - Trace Analyzer, IBM Israel >>> >>> Then there are*specific questions*for the second group: >>> >>> - Cloud Chapter >>> - Why having a DCRM by IBM and one by >>> Intel? Differences? >>> - Object Storage GEi by IBM:?? Status? >>> - Edgelets Manager by Thales: not in the >>> Catalogue? >>> - Data Chapter >>> - UDA ? unstructured data analysis by >>> ATOS?? Status? >>> - Apps Chapter >>> - Relation Mediator_TI by Telecom Italia >>> and SETHA2 by >>> Thales? >>> - IoT Chapter >>> - (Gateway) Device Management, Gateway Device >>> Management / Franhoufer: not in the Catalogue? >>> - Test and evaluation server environment >>> for NGSI by >>> SAP?? Status? >>> - Template Handler by SAP?? Status? >>> - Security Chapter >>> - KeyRock by UPM?? Status? >>> - Access Proxy by UPM?? Status? >>> - MiWi Chapter >>> - Where are Advanced Middleware, 2D-UI, 3D-UI, >>> Synchronization, Cloud Rendering, Display as a Service, GIS Data >>> Provider, POI Data Provider, 2D-3D-Capture, Augmented Reality, >>> Real-Virtual Interaction, Virtual Character, Interface >>> Designer? Status? >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Arian >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------__------------------------------__------------ >>> >>> >>> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede >>> consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo >>> electr?nico >>> en el enlace situado m?s abajo. >>> This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We >>> only send >>> and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: >>> http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/__disclaimer.aspx >>> >>> _________________________________________________ >>> Fiware mailing list >>> Fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu >>> >> > >>> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/__listinfo/fiware >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _________________________________________________ >>> Fiware-miwi mailing list >>> Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu >>> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/__listinfo/fiware-miwi >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> ------------------------------__------------------------------__------------- >>> Deutsches Forschungszentrum f?r K?nstliche Intelligenz (DFKI) GmbH >>> Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern >>> >>> Gesch?ftsf?hrung: >>> Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender) >>> Dr. Walter Olthoff >>> Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: >>> Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes >>> >>> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Kaiserslautern (HRB 2313) >>> USt-Id.Nr.: DE 148646973, Steuernummer: 19/673/0060/3 >>> ------------------------------__------------------------------__--------------- >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Fiware-miwi mailing list >>> Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu >>> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila >>> VP, Technology >>> Cyberlightning Ltd. >>> >>> mobile. +358 405245142 >>> email. jarkko at cyberlightning.com >>> >>> Go to www.cybersli.de and enrich your >>> presentations! >>> >>> www.cyberlightning.com >> >> >> -- >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Deutsches Forschungszentrum f?r K?nstliche Intelligenz (DFKI) GmbH >> Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern >> >> Gesch?ftsf?hrung: >> Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender) >> Dr. Walter Olthoff >> Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: >> Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes >> >> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Kaiserslautern (HRB 2313) >> USt-Id.Nr.: DE 148646973, Steuernummer: 19/673/0060/3 >> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Fiware-miwi mailing list >> Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu >> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi > > ________________________________ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Deutsches Forschungszentrum f?r K?nstliche Intelligenz (DFKI) GmbH Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern Gesch?ftsf?hrung: Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender) Dr. Walter Olthoff Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes Sitz der Gesellschaft: Kaiserslautern (HRB 2313) USt-Id.Nr.: DE 148646973, Steuernummer: 19/673/0060/3 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: slusallek.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 456 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jonne at adminotech.com Mon Dec 16 10:55:31 2013 From: jonne at adminotech.com (Jonne Nauha) Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 11:55:31 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-miwi] miwi GE infos (Fwd: [Fiware] QUITE IMPORTANT AND URGENT: RE: GEs to discuss in the review meeting) In-Reply-To: <52AE8541.1060409@dfki.de> References: <52AB72ED.9040600@tid.es> <9AED604A-EDCC-4CBF-A3F4-88DA91DC703C@playsign.net> <52AD4F82.7010303@dfki.de> <52ADB32F.3020700@dfki.de> <0D6323B5-0108-455A-8C68-387A23535044@tid.es> <52AE8541.1060409@dfki.de> Message-ID: Hey all, here is a summary of Adminotech's FIWARE work and its impact on our business and products. Hopefully this is what you were after, let us know if you need something more comprehensive. All our GEs will have a January release and after it we will work on completing extra functionality and bugfixing. If someone could verify that this came to the right thread (and email receivers) or if we should post this additionally somewhere else. Hopefully you can sort out the GE specs and manuals/documentation so that the needed people (reviewers) can see them, as they have been prepared by the MIWI parties a long time ago (as discussed earlier here). See below for our summary details of the work and effects so far. ----------- *Results* - MiWi.CloudRendering - Public open source incensed source code for the web service and web client https://github.com/Adminotech/fiware-cloud-rendering-service and the renderer https://github.com/Adminotech/fiware-cloud-rendering-renderer - Can be ran and demoed locally. FI-LAB demo of the renderer can be done once there are GPU instances on FI-LAB (we are still waiting for answers on this). - MiWi.2D-UI - Public open source incensed source code https://github.com/Adminotech/fi-ware-2D-UI - This GE is integrated as part of the Meshmoon WebRocket 1.0 client release in January 2014. - MiWi.InterfaceDesigner - Public open source incensed source code https://github.com/Adminotech/fiware-interface-designer (code push pending, we are still sorting out the XML3D vs. Tundra base EC model intergation to be clean) - This GE is integrated as part of the Meshmoon WebRocket 1.0 client release in January 2014. *Effect* The Meshmoon is a multiuser 3D application server for creating your own collaborative 3D spaces. Meshmoon ? the World?s fastest growing networked 3D ?platform that enables anyone to create their own 3D-space in one minute. Select one of the public layers and/or the applications you need and you are ready to start building and collaborating on your 3D space. Currently we are hosting more than 1300 collaborative 3D spaces. 60% of our users are from the USA, 30% from the EU, and 10% from the rest of the world. Meshmoon Rocket end user client is based on the open source realXtend Tundra SDK and the FI-WARE MIWI GE's. *Adminotech's Meshmoon platform utilizes the following MIWI GE's* - MiWi.Synchronization - MiWi.InterfaceDesigner - MiWi.2D-UI *Rocket feature highlights* - Native desktop client for Windows and Mac - Web browser client (public 1.0 coming in January) that utilizes FIWARE WIMI technology. - Easy to use storage and asset editors to import and tweak your content - Extensive build mode to design and build your world - Presis for quick and easy 3D PowerPoint and PDF presentations - Oculus Rift, stereoscopic 3D and Cave rendering support - Extending the realXtend platform with Meshmoon components *Meshmoon hosting feature highlights* - Documentation and tutorials for end users, artists and developers - Easy web based world management - Automatically scaling cloud infrastructure - Application store for free and paid applications - Scene layers to share and use content easily *Future* We will research more cloud based solutions, FI-LAB utilization, POI, GIS GE's in the future productisation. *Adminotech Meshmoon will use the following MIWI GE's in Q1 of 2014* - MiWi.VirtualCharacters - MiWi.CloudRendering - Meshmoon WebRocket will also support XML3D during 2014 Best regards, Jonne Nauha Meshmoon developer at Adminotech Ltd. www.meshmoon.com On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 6:44 AM, Philipp Slusallek < Philipp.Slusallek at dfki.de> wrote: > Hi Miguel, > > Sorry, but our stuff has been ready for review for a long time now, so > that am very surprised that you say that it has not even been submitted. I > even asked Juanjo at the AB meeting why the review and publishing takes so > long. Christof? > > I am not familiar with the official procedures, but you find the documents > at http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi- > ware-private/index.php/WP13_Integration#OpenSpecification_ > .26_Architecture_Pages > > At least the architecture descriptions have been ready for many weeks, > while the other documentation should be mostly complete by now as well (did > not attend the last weekly call). > > Miguel, Christof, maybe we can generate a document today that contains the > documentation and that can be shown to the reviewers if they ask. We should > be able to point to something at least, even if it is not reviewed yet. > > > Best, > > Philipp > > Am 16.12.2013 00:58, schrieb Miguel Carrillo: > > Sorry to break in the list but things are diverting too much from the >> procedures common to all WP. >> >> The private wiki "does not exist" and mustn't be mentioned to the EC and >> the reviewers. Philipp, you can say that you have "internal drafts " or >> whatever, but never ever that there is private project or a private wiki. >> >> Let me be clear. WP13 has not submited their open specs for internal >> review. I asked for his a number of times in the last weeks with no luck. >> You can publish this once approved, but not without prior approval. And we >> cannot approve something that the wpl does not signal as ready for review! >> >> I will not interfere in the internal matters of wp13 but let us be fair. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Miguel >> >> Enviado desde mi iPad >> >> El 15/12/2013, a las 14:48, Philipp Slusallek >>> escribi?: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Am 15.12.2013 12:01, schrieb Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila: >>> >>>> Please correct me now if I am wrong, but all the requested information >>>> is already available! >>>> >>> >>> Yes and No. Here is my view again in some more detail: >>> >>> -- The Open Specification are in the private Wiki, but not in the public >>> one, which means that the commission could in principle see them, but >>> likely will not find them (unless we tell them, which we should do :-). >>> Putting your report on a (public Wiki) may be a good starting point for >>> this. >>> >>> -- Outside of FI-WARE or the commission (e.g. use-case projects, general >>> public) the Open Spec will not be seen at all. We need to move it to the >>> Public Wiki. At the AB meeting on Fri I specifically asked Juanjo to speed >>> up this process, as our stuff has been ready for many weeks now and people >>> keep asking for it. >>> >>> -- At the end the commission and the public will be mainly looking at >>> the FI-WARE catalog. Our stuff only gets in there if it fulfills certain >>> quality criteria. The most important ones are the quality of all the other >>> documentation we are preparing right now, including software and examples >>> to test things out, T&C, etc. >>> >>> -- For the FI-LAB catalog we also need the Blueprints for automatic >>> installation. This is mandatory for server-based components but I suggest >>> that we also provide them for client-based software by requesting a >>> Web-server blueprint (probably available already) and deploying the SW and >>> examples to it. >>> >>> Christof, feel free to correct me or add things I missed. >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Philipp >>> >>> You all know what is in the Open Specification. Up to this date, they >>>> are as ready as they can be. We are having tracker, and feature sets, >>>> and we have scheduled the development. From the schedule it can be seen >>>> that everything what we plan is going to be ready in January, with minor >>>> issues being patched after it. There are also installation and user >>>> guides. At least on behalf of Cyber and CIE, those are up to date and >>>> collectively already describe everything required. To emphasize: those >>>> guides already make a number of references to github source code >>>> repositories (which is allowed) and we already have a number of demos >>>> online and they are collectively described in one place. This place is >>>> now in the "interim payment" document, which contains demo links from >>>> Cyber and Playsign. Other parties did not deliver anything for it. >>>> >>>> So, given this, in my opinion the only thing we might be lacking is the >>>> collective list of demo links in Wiki. Obviously the interim report is >>>> not enough (since it is not public), and hence it should be published >>>> somewhere in the Wiki. >>>> >>>> Other thing we are missing still is the FI-LAB components. Those will >>>> come together with January release, in one form or another. >>>> >>>> Am I missing something? :) Maybe the other thing we need to be >>>> collectively doing, is a summarizing report of the progress, of which >>>> naturally contains a summary of the current Wiki status. >>>> >>>> - jarkko >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 8:43 AM, Philipp Slusallek >>>> > wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Toni, all, >>>> >>>> I and Juanjo were at the Architecture Board meeting in Madrid >>>> Thu/Fri when that message arrived and did briefly talk about it. >>>> >>>> Here is my perspective based on the discussion with Juanjo: It is >>>> not a major issue. The point is listed last and we assume that Arian >>>> is just wondering when the GEs will become available as there is >>>> little information on this available yet (as discussed before). >>>> >>>> >>>> However, there are a few things that we should do: >>>> >>>> -- Put together a list of our GEs that will be ready for the January >>>> release. Please all respond as quickly as possible by email, maybe >>>> we can set up a document somewhere where we can collect the >>>> information. >>>> >>>> -- For GEs that will not be ready for January we should have a good >>>> explanation. >>>> >>>> -- This list should be sent to Juanjo on Monday (before their review >>>> on Tuesday) !! >>>> >>>> -- As agreed with Christof we need to push for information being >>>> made publicly available on FI-WARE Wiki and need to put them in the >>>> FI-WARE Catalog as well. >>>> >>>> -- GEs should also be available on FI-LAB. There they will only be >>>> accepted on FI-LAB when their quality is high enough. We need to >>>> make sure it is. This also requires setting up blueprints (at least >>>> for SEs that need to be installed on a server, which can also mean >>>> Web server + JS libraries). >>>> >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> >>>> Philipp >>>> >>>> Am 14.12.2013 14:54, schrieb Toni Alatalo: >>>> >>>> Was just wondering about this ? is this simply due to WP13 GEs >>>> not >>>> having been part of any official fi-ware release yet? >>>> >>>> Or is something missing about the status of our GEs? Many of >>>> them are >>>> already available in work-in-progress pre-release mode, on >>>> github. Just >>>> wanted to mention Christof that if you need help in gathering >>>> MIWI GE >>>> status, links to the source codes and info about commercial >>>> exploitation >>>> etc. we can quite easily do that. And demo links ofc. >>>> >>>> For example, CIEs POI backend: >>>> GE is available from >>>> https://github.com/Chiru/WeX/__tree/master/poi >>>> >>>> and live demo at >>>> http://chiru.cie.fi/FI-WARE/__demos/POI/map_demo/ >>>> >>>> >>>> etc. for almost all MIWI GEs. But right now I?m afraid that info >>>> is not >>>> gathered anywhere (that demo link for what the guys showed at >>>> the F2F I >>>> asked and got by private email) ? would be good to have in the >>>> wiki in >>>> any case I figure. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> ~Toni >>>> >>>> Begin forwarded message: >>>> >>>> *From: *Juanjo Hierro >>> >>> >> >>>> *Subject: **[Fiware] QUITE IMPORTANT AND URGENT: RE: GEs to >>>> discuss in >>>> the review meeting* >>>> *Date: *13 Dec 2013 22:49:49 GMT+2 >>>> *To: *"fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu >>>> >>>> >>> >" >>>> >>>> >>> >> >>>> >>>> >>>> Dear FI-WARE GEi owners, >>>> >>>> We have got a very clear response from our PO, Arian >>>> Zweger, about >>>> what are the concrete GEis which are going to be >>>> particularly >>>> questioned during the month 30 project review next week. >>>> >>>> Please react accordingly so that: >>>> >>>> * you provide your WPL the necessary information that >>>> will allow him >>>> >>>> to answer any potential question at the review; or >>>> * let us know INMEDIATELY whether you will attend the >>>> meeting >>>> >>>> personally, as to be able to respond any questions >>>> directly >>>> >>>> Note that, regarding the first set of GEis, Arian >>>> mentions that the >>>> EC and reviewers wish to explore whether it is worthwhile to >>>> continue >>>> funding development. >>>> >>>> Some questions that I wouldn't be surprised if the >>>> PO/reviewers make: >>>> >>>> * What are your commercial plans around the GEis beyond >>>> the FI-PPP ? >>>> * (for those cases were the GEi is not being offered as >>>> open >>>> >>>> source): what are the FRAND terms under which you plan >>>> to deliver >>>> your GEi beyond the FI-PPP ? >>>> * If you are not involved in any proposal focused on >>>> continuation of >>>> >>>> the Technology Foundation (FI-WARE) ... how do you plan >>>> to provide >>>> lab support of your GEi to SMEs in phase 3 or even UC >>>> projects in >>>> phase 2 trials ? How doy you plan to provide level 1 >>>> and 2 >>>> support of you GEi if deployed on FI-Lab ? >>>> >>>> Besides this, there are a number of questions regarding >>>> GEis in >>>> several chapters that WPLs/WPAs should prepare a response >>>> for. >>>> >>>> For those who didn't follow the details about the next >>>> month 30 >>>> project review, these are the logistics: >>>> >>>> Reharsal: Rehearsal: 16-17/Dec. Telef?nica?s office >>>> (Avenue des >>>> Arts, 20).The meeting will start at 11:15-12:00 on >>>> Monday. >>>> Review: 18^th December 2013, avenue de Beaulieu BU25 >>>> 0/S2 >>>> >>>> agenda of the >>>> >>>> review:https://docs.google.__com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=__ >>>> 0AmxBgS-__lWT4vdDB6NXJzMHVubDg1Zko5VG5Bb__zAzSnc#gid=0 >>>> >>> lWT4vdDB6NXJzMHVubDg1Zko5VG5BbzAzSnc#gid=0> >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> >>>> -- Juanjo Hierro >>>> >>>> P.D.: A note about the list below ... apartently, the DCA >>>> GEi was in >>>> the list because of an inconsistent message in the catalogue >>>> (it was >>>> mentioned that the product was going to be licensed as open >>>> source >>>> while at the same time it was stated that it could be used >>>> under >>>> certain terms and conditions). This has already been >>>> fixed. >>>> >>>> ------------- >>>> Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica >>>> Digital >>>> website:www.tid.es >>>> email:jhierro at tid.es >>>> twitter:twitter.com/__JuanjoHierro >>>> >>>> >>> > >>>> >>>> >>>> FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator >>>> and Chief Architect >>>> >>>> FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman >>>> >>>> You can follow FI-WARE at: >>>> website:http://www.fi-ware.eu >>>> >>>> facebook:http://www.facebook.__com/pages/FI-WARE/__251366491587242 >>>> >>>> twitter:http://twitter.com/__FIware >>>> >>>> linkedIn:http://www.linkedin._ >>>> _com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -------- Original Message -------- >>>> Subject: RE: GEs to discuss in the review meeting >>>> Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 14:33:44 +0000 >>>> From: >>> > >>>> To: > >>>> CC: >>> >,>>> > >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Dear Miguel, >>>> >>>> As requested, please find a list below. >>>> >>>> The question for the first group is*whether it is >>>> worthwhile to >>>> continue funding development of:* >>>> >>>> - Data Chapter >>>> - Compressed Domain Video Analysis, Codoan >>>> / Siemens >>>> - Metadata Preprocessing, MetadataProcessor >>>> / Siemens >>>> - Media-enhanced Query Broker, QueryBroker >>>> / Siemens >>>> - Apps Chapter >>>> - (Service Composition, Ericsson >>>> Composition Editor >>>> (ECE) / Ericsson) >>>> - Service Mashup, Mashup Factory / DT >>>> - Mediator, Mediator_TI / Telecom Italia >>>> - IoT Chapter >>>> - (Backend) Configuration Management, IoT >>>> Discovery - UNIS >>>> - (Backend) IoT Broker, IoT Broker - NEC >>>> - (Backend) Device Management, IDAS DCA - >>>> TID >>>> - (Gateway) Protocol Adapter, ZPA / Telecom >>>> Italia / >>>> EPCGE / Orange >>>> - Security Chapter >>>> - Security Monitoring / Android >>>> Vulnerability >>>> Assessment, Ovaldroid / Inria >>>> - Identity Management, GCP / DT >>>> - Identity Management, One-IDM / NSN >>>> - Identity Management, DigitalSelf / NSN >>>> - Malware Detection Service (Opt), Morphus >>>> / Inria >>>> - I2ND Chapter >>>> - Cloud Proxy >>>> - (I2ND) Network Information and Control >>>> (NetIC-VNP), >>>> Altoclient/ALU-D >>>> - (I2ND) Network Information and Control >>>> (NetIC-OFNIC), VNP/NSN >>>> - (I2ND) Network Information and Control >>>> (NetIC-altoclient), VNEIC/ALU-I >>>> - (I2ND) Service Connectivity Capability >>>> and Control >>>> (S3C), S3C / DT >>>> - Tools >>>> - Trace Analyzer, IBM Israel >>>> >>>> Then there are*specific questions*for the second group: >>>> >>>> - Cloud Chapter >>>> - Why having a DCRM by IBM and one by >>>> Intel? Differences? >>>> - Object Storage GEi by IBM:?? Status? >>>> - Edgelets Manager by Thales: not in the >>>> Catalogue? >>>> - Data Chapter >>>> - UDA ? unstructured data analysis by >>>> ATOS?? Status? >>>> - Apps Chapter >>>> - Relation Mediator_TI by Telecom Italia >>>> and SETHA2 by >>>> Thales? >>>> - IoT Chapter >>>> - (Gateway) Device Management, Gateway >>>> Device >>>> Management / Franhoufer: not in the Catalogue? >>>> - Test and evaluation server environment >>>> for NGSI by >>>> SAP?? Status? >>>> - Template Handler by SAP?? Status? >>>> - Security Chapter >>>> - KeyRock by UPM?? Status? >>>> - Access Proxy by UPM?? Status? >>>> - MiWi Chapter >>>> - Where are Advanced Middleware, 2D-UI, >>>> 3D-UI, >>>> Synchronization, Cloud Rendering, Display as a Service, GIS >>>> Data >>>> Provider, POI Data Provider, 2D-3D-Capture, Augmented >>>> Reality, >>>> Real-Virtual Interaction, Virtual Character, Interface >>>> Designer? Status? >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> Arian >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> __------------------------------__------------ >>>> >>>> >>>> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. >>>> Puede >>>> consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo >>>> electr?nico >>>> en el enlace situado m?s abajo. >>>> This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We >>>> only send >>>> and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: >>>> http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/__disclaimer.aspx >>>> >>>> _________________________________________________ >>>> Fiware mailing list >>>> Fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu >>>> >>> > >>>> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/__listinfo/fiware >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _________________________________________________ >>>> Fiware-miwi mailing list >>>> Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu >>> ware.eu> >>>> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/__listinfo/fiware-miwi >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> ------------------------------__---------------------------- >>>> --__------------- >>>> Deutsches Forschungszentrum f?r K?nstliche Intelligenz (DFKI) GmbH >>>> Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern >>>> >>>> Gesch?ftsf?hrung: >>>> Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender) >>>> Dr. Walter Olthoff >>>> Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: >>>> Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes >>>> >>>> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Kaiserslautern (HRB 2313) >>>> USt-Id.Nr.: DE 148646973, Steuernummer: 19/673/0060/3 >>>> ------------------------------__---------------------------- >>>> --__--------------- >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Fiware-miwi mailing list >>>> Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu >>>> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila >>>> VP, Technology >>>> Cyberlightning Ltd. >>>> >>>> mobile. +358 405245142 >>>> email. jarkko at cyberlightning.com >>>> >>>> Go to www.cybersli.de and enrich your >>>> presentations! >>>> >>>> www.cyberlightning.com >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------ >>> ------------- >>> Deutsches Forschungszentrum f?r K?nstliche Intelligenz (DFKI) GmbH >>> Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern >>> >>> Gesch?ftsf?hrung: >>> Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender) >>> Dr. Walter Olthoff >>> Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: >>> Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes >>> >>> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Kaiserslautern (HRB 2313) >>> USt-Id.Nr.: DE 148646973, Steuernummer: 19/673/0060/3 >>> ------------------------------------------------------------ >>> --------------- >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Fiware-miwi mailing list >>> Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu >>> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi >>> >> >> ________________________________ >> >> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar >> nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace >> situado m?s abajo. >> This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and >> receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: >> http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx >> >> > > -- > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Deutsches Forschungszentrum f?r K?nstliche Intelligenz (DFKI) GmbH > Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern > > Gesch?ftsf?hrung: > Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender) > Dr. Walter Olthoff > Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: > Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes > > Sitz der Gesellschaft: Kaiserslautern (HRB 2313) > USt-Id.Nr.: DE 148646973, Steuernummer: 19/673/0060/3 > ------------------------------------------------------------ > --------------- > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-miwi mailing list > Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lasse.oorni at ludocraft.com Mon Dec 16 11:25:45 2013 From: lasse.oorni at ludocraft.com (=?iso-8859-1?Q?=22Lasse_=D6=F6rni=22?=) Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 12:25:45 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-miwi] miwi GE infos (Fwd: [Fiware] QUITE IMPORTANT AND URGENT: RE: GEs to discuss in the review meeting) In-Reply-To: References: <52AB72ED.9040600@tid.es> <9AED604A-EDCC-4CBF-A3F4-88DA91DC703C@playsign.net> <52AD4F82.7010303@dfki.de> <52ADB32F.3020700@dfki.de> <0D6323B5-0108-455A-8C68-387A23535044@tid.es> <52AE8541.1060409@dfki.de> Message-ID: <8325fc8a4a4d1fb27b110ae0ed1fc117.squirrel@urho.ludocraft.com> Hi, here's the same for LudoCraft's EC's: Synchronization * Will be released in January, additional functionality will be developed later, but is in working condition * Apache 2.0 licensed open source, code available at https://github.com/realXtend/WebTundraNetworking Virtual Characters * Not ready for January release due to developer resource constraints, but will be worked on throughout Q1 2014 * Will be released as Apache 2.0 licensed open source. Repository address likely the same as for Synchronization LudoCraft will be utilizing (and improving if necessary) these GE's for web based 3D products and client projects. If there's additional clarification needed, I'm happy to answer. - Lasse > Hey all, here is a summary of Adminotech's FIWARE work and its impact on > our business and products. Hopefully this is what you were after, let us > know if you need something more comprehensive. All our GEs will have a > January release and after it we will work on completing extra > functionality > and bugfixing. From erno at playsign.net Mon Dec 16 11:39:11 2013 From: erno at playsign.net (Erno Kuusela) Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 12:39:11 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-miwi] Display As A Service guides? Message-ID: <20131216103911.GN47616@ee.oulu.fi> Hello, I signed up to to review guides for Display as a Service but haven't been able to find them in the wiki http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/WP13_Integration#User_and_Programmers_Guides Any ideas? Erno From torsten.spieldenner at dfki.de Mon Dec 16 12:00:41 2013 From: torsten.spieldenner at dfki.de (Torsten Spieldenner) Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 12:00:41 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-miwi] Display As A Service guides? In-Reply-To: <20131216103911.GN47616@ee.oulu.fi> References: <20131216103911.GN47616@ee.oulu.fi> Message-ID: <52AEDD59.1020706@dfki.de> Hello, the DaaS guides are not added to the Wiki yet. I am sorry for the delay. Reason is that I need some input from Alex and the DaaS development team, but Alex was out of office last week. I plan to finish the documentation later today, latest tomorrow. Torsten Am 12/16/2013 11:39 AM, schrieb Erno Kuusela: > Hello, > > I signed up to to review guides for Display as a Service but haven't > been able to find them in the wiki > http://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/WP13_Integration#User_and_Programmers_Guides > > Any ideas? > > Erno > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-miwi mailing list > Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi From mach at zhaw.ch Mon Dec 16 18:05:26 2013 From: mach at zhaw.ch (Christof Marti) Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 18:05:26 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-miwi] miwi GE infos (Fwd: [Fiware] QUITE IMPORTANT AND URGENT: RE: GEs to discuss in the review meeting) In-Reply-To: <22228ee4df844a4bb7a53cd8e9b05805@SRV-MAIL-001.zhaw.ch> References: <52AB72ED.9040600@tid.es> <9AED604A-EDCC-4CBF-A3F4-88DA91DC703C@playsign.net> <52AD4F82.7010303@dfki.de> <22228ee4df844a4bb7a53cd8e9b05805@SRV-MAIL-001.zhaw.ch> Message-ID: <70EAB876-63E6-461A-92EA-1063FCDB9859@zhaw.ch> Dear WP13 GE owners and partners Sorry for coming back to you so late. It was not exactly clear how the questions will be addressed at the review meeting on Wednesday. I joined now the rehearsal meeting in Brussels (after an traveling for 7h because of delayed and missed flights), where we prepare the content for the review. After todays discussion, the structure is more clear now. I will present the status of WP13 and all its GEs in a very short slot (max 5 min.) Therefore I would like to have 1 slide with a short overview per GE, in table-form with the following fields: (these should only relate to the FI-WARE GEis features / not commercial additions) GE-Name: generic name of the GE GEI-Name: name of the specific implementation Partner(s) involved: Terms&Conditions: (Exact type of license for the GEi: commercial xxx, ?, Apache 2, MIT, GPLv2,.?) Status (Open API): now (not avail yet, early draft, draft, preliminary, final), reason why and why available. Current status: What is available at this moment What?s available in M33 (R3.2): 2-3 major features (or full functionality) What?s available in M36 (R3.3): additional features (or full functionality) Planned to be available in FI-LAB? yes/no (how: blue-print, vm image, global instance, demo app) Demo-Links To add this I prepared a Google Spreadsheet. Please complete it for your GE. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Auieh_fs3EUxdEhYRnVwN3lzcHF1dFU3elh0R2ZTd1E#gid=0 (I will then see, if I can compact and reduce the amount of data, columns, ? for the slide) I will add a summary slide of the WP13 status at all: Common points, OpenSpecification, Manuals, deliverables, ? (I also have a Word version of the OpenSpecification with me) Then I would like to prepare 1 slide per partner where he can elaborate on Examination plans Dissemination activities (executed, planned) Other comments (planned usage of UC-projects, reasons why something might get delayed, ?) Not sure if it will be used, but in case there are questions I can select the slide and show it. Please use the attached template for your slide. I saw some of you sent already some content. It?s fastest if you add it to Deadline for all of the above is: Tomorrow Tuesday noon (12:00) (the earlier the better, because I also have to put it together to a nice presentation) Thanks for your support. Best regards Christof ---- InIT Cloud Computing Lab - ICCLab http://cloudcomp.ch Institut of Applied Information Technology - InIT Zurich University of Applied Sciences - ZHAW School of Engineering Phone: +41 58 934 70 63 Skype: christof-marti Am 15.12.2013 um 14:48 schrieb Philipp Slusallek : > Hi all, > > Am 15.12.2013 12:01, schrieb Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila: >> Please correct me now if I am wrong, but all the requested information >> is already available! > > Yes and No. Here is my view again in some more detail: > > -- The Open Specification are in the private Wiki, but not in the public > one, which means that the commission could in principle see them, but > likely will not find them (unless we tell them, which we should do :-). > Putting your report on a (public Wiki) may be a good starting point for > this. > > -- Outside of FI-WARE or the commission (e.g. use-case projects, general > public) the Open Spec will not be seen at all. We need to move it to the > Public Wiki. At the AB meeting on Fri I specifically asked Juanjo to > speed up this process, as our stuff has been ready for many weeks now > and people keep asking for it. > > -- At the end the commission and the public will be mainly looking at > the FI-WARE catalog. Our stuff only gets in there if it fulfills certain > quality criteria. The most important ones are the quality of all the > other documentation we are preparing right now, including software and > examples to test things out, T&C, etc. > > -- For the FI-LAB catalog we also need the Blueprints for automatic > installation. This is mandatory for server-based components but I > suggest that we also provide them for client-based software by > requesting a Web-server blueprint (probably available already) and > deploying the SW and examples to it. > > Christof, feel free to correct me or add things I missed. > > > Thanks, > > Philipp > >> You all know what is in the Open Specification. Up to this date, they >> are as ready as they can be. We are having tracker, and feature sets, >> and we have scheduled the development. From the schedule it can be seen >> that everything what we plan is going to be ready in January, with minor >> issues being patched after it. There are also installation and user >> guides. At least on behalf of Cyber and CIE, those are up to date and >> collectively already describe everything required. To emphasize: those >> guides already make a number of references to github source code >> repositories (which is allowed) and we already have a number of demos >> online and they are collectively described in one place. This place is >> now in the "interim payment" document, which contains demo links from >> Cyber and Playsign. Other parties did not deliver anything for it. >> >> So, given this, in my opinion the only thing we might be lacking is the >> collective list of demo links in Wiki. Obviously the interim report is >> not enough (since it is not public), and hence it should be published >> somewhere in the Wiki. >> >> Other thing we are missing still is the FI-LAB components. Those will >> come together with January release, in one form or another. >> >> Am I missing something? :) Maybe the other thing we need to be >> collectively doing, is a summarizing report of the progress, of which >> naturally contains a summary of the current Wiki status. >> >> - jarkko >> >> >> >> On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 8:43 AM, Philipp Slusallek >> > wrote: >> >> Hi Toni, all, >> >> I and Juanjo were at the Architecture Board meeting in Madrid >> Thu/Fri when that message arrived and did briefly talk about it. >> >> Here is my perspective based on the discussion with Juanjo: It is >> not a major issue. The point is listed last and we assume that Arian >> is just wondering when the GEs will become available as there is >> little information on this available yet (as discussed before). >> >> >> However, there are a few things that we should do: >> >> -- Put together a list of our GEs that will be ready for the January >> release. Please all respond as quickly as possible by email, maybe >> we can set up a document somewhere where we can collect the information. >> >> -- For GEs that will not be ready for January we should have a good >> explanation. >> >> -- This list should be sent to Juanjo on Monday (before their review >> on Tuesday) !! >> >> -- As agreed with Christof we need to push for information being >> made publicly available on FI-WARE Wiki and need to put them in the >> FI-WARE Catalog as well. >> >> -- GEs should also be available on FI-LAB. There they will only be >> accepted on FI-LAB when their quality is high enough. We need to >> make sure it is. This also requires setting up blueprints (at least >> for SEs that need to be installed on a server, which can also mean >> Web server + JS libraries). >> >> >> Best, >> >> Philipp >> >> Am 14.12.2013 14:54, schrieb Toni Alatalo: >> >> Was just wondering about this ? is this simply due to WP13 GEs not >> having been part of any official fi-ware release yet? >> >> Or is something missing about the status of our GEs? Many of >> them are >> already available in work-in-progress pre-release mode, on >> github. Just >> wanted to mention Christof that if you need help in gathering >> MIWI GE >> status, links to the source codes and info about commercial >> exploitation >> etc. we can quite easily do that. And demo links ofc. >> >> For example, CIEs POI backend: >> GE is available from >> https://github.com/Chiru/WeX/__tree/master/poi >> >> and live demo at >> http://chiru.cie.fi/FI-WARE/__demos/POI/map_demo/ >> >> >> etc. for almost all MIWI GEs. But right now I?m afraid that info >> is not >> gathered anywhere (that demo link for what the guys showed at >> the F2F I >> asked and got by private email) ? would be good to have in the >> wiki in >> any case I figure. >> >> Cheers, >> ~Toni >> >> Begin forwarded message: >> >> *From: *Juanjo Hierro > > >> >> *Subject: **[Fiware] QUITE IMPORTANT AND URGENT: RE: GEs to >> discuss in >> the review meeting* >> *Date: *13 Dec 2013 22:49:49 GMT+2 >> *To: *"fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu >> >> > >" >> >> > >> >> >> >> Dear FI-WARE GEi owners, >> >> We have got a very clear response from our PO, Arian >> Zweger, about >> what are the concrete GEis which are going to be particularly >> questioned during the month 30 project review next week. >> >> Please react accordingly so that: >> >> * you provide your WPL the necessary information that >> will allow him >> >> to answer any potential question at the review; or >> * let us know INMEDIATELY whether you will attend the meeting >> >> personally, as to be able to respond any questions directly >> >> Note that, regarding the first set of GEis, Arian >> mentions that the >> EC and reviewers wish to explore whether it is worthwhile to >> continue >> funding development. >> >> Some questions that I wouldn't be surprised if the >> PO/reviewers make: >> >> * What are your commercial plans around the GEis beyond >> the FI-PPP ? >> * (for those cases were the GEi is not being offered as open >> >> source): what are the FRAND terms under which you plan >> to deliver >> your GEi beyond the FI-PPP ? >> * If you are not involved in any proposal focused on >> continuation of >> >> the Technology Foundation (FI-WARE) ... how do you plan >> to provide >> lab support of your GEi to SMEs in phase 3 or even UC >> projects in >> phase 2 trials ? How doy you plan to provide level 1 >> and 2 >> support of you GEi if deployed on FI-Lab ? >> >> Besides this, there are a number of questions regarding >> GEis in >> several chapters that WPLs/WPAs should prepare a response for. >> >> For those who didn't follow the details about the next >> month 30 >> project review, these are the logistics: >> >> Reharsal: Rehearsal: 16-17/Dec. Telef?nica?s office >> (Avenue des >> Arts, 20).The meeting will start at 11:15-12:00 on Monday. >> Review: 18^th December 2013, avenue de Beaulieu BU25 0/S2 >> >> agenda of the >> >> review:https://docs.google.__com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=__0AmxBgS-__lWT4vdDB6NXJzMHVubDg1Zko5VG5Bb__zAzSnc#gid=0 >> >> >> Best regards, >> >> -- Juanjo Hierro >> >> P.D.: A note about the list below ... apartently, the DCA >> GEi was in >> the list because of an inconsistent message in the catalogue >> (it was >> mentioned that the product was going to be licensed as open >> source >> while at the same time it was stated that it could be used under >> certain terms and conditions). This has already been fixed. >> >> ------------- >> Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital >> website:www.tid.es >> email:jhierro at tid.es >> twitter:twitter.com/__JuanjoHierro >> >> > > >> >> >> FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator >> and Chief Architect >> >> FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman >> >> You can follow FI-WARE at: >> website:http://www.fi-ware.eu >> >> facebook:http://www.facebook.__com/pages/FI-WARE/__251366491587242 >> twitter:http://twitter.com/__FIware >> >> linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.__com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 >> >> >> >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: RE: GEs to discuss in the review meeting >> Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 14:33:44 +0000 >> From: > > >> To: > >> CC: > >,> > >> >> >> >> Dear Miguel, >> >> As requested, please find a list below. >> >> The question for the first group is*whether it is worthwhile to >> continue funding development of:* >> >> - Data Chapter >> - Compressed Domain Video Analysis, Codoan >> / Siemens >> - Metadata Preprocessing, MetadataProcessor >> / Siemens >> - Media-enhanced Query Broker, QueryBroker >> / Siemens >> - Apps Chapter >> - (Service Composition, Ericsson >> Composition Editor >> (ECE) / Ericsson) >> - Service Mashup, Mashup Factory / DT >> - Mediator, Mediator_TI / Telecom Italia >> - IoT Chapter >> - (Backend) Configuration Management, IoT >> Discovery - UNIS >> - (Backend) IoT Broker, IoT Broker - NEC >> - (Backend) Device Management, IDAS DCA - TID >> - (Gateway) Protocol Adapter, ZPA / Telecom >> Italia / >> EPCGE / Orange >> - Security Chapter >> - Security Monitoring / Android Vulnerability >> Assessment, Ovaldroid / Inria >> - Identity Management, GCP / DT >> - Identity Management, One-IDM / NSN >> - Identity Management, DigitalSelf / NSN >> - Malware Detection Service (Opt), Morphus >> / Inria >> - I2ND Chapter >> - Cloud Proxy >> - (I2ND) Network Information and Control >> (NetIC-VNP), >> Altoclient/ALU-D >> - (I2ND) Network Information and Control >> (NetIC-OFNIC), VNP/NSN >> - (I2ND) Network Information and Control >> (NetIC-altoclient), VNEIC/ALU-I >> - (I2ND) Service Connectivity Capability >> and Control >> (S3C), S3C / DT >> - Tools >> - Trace Analyzer, IBM Israel >> >> Then there are*specific questions*for the second group: >> >> - Cloud Chapter >> - Why having a DCRM by IBM and one by >> Intel? Differences? >> - Object Storage GEi by IBM:?? Status? >> - Edgelets Manager by Thales: not in the >> Catalogue? >> - Data Chapter >> - UDA ? unstructured data analysis by >> ATOS?? Status? >> - Apps Chapter >> - Relation Mediator_TI by Telecom Italia >> and SETHA2 by >> Thales? >> - IoT Chapter >> - (Gateway) Device Management, Gateway Device >> Management / Franhoufer: not in the Catalogue? >> - Test and evaluation server environment >> for NGSI by >> SAP?? Status? >> - Template Handler by SAP?? Status? >> - Security Chapter >> - KeyRock by UPM?? Status? >> - Access Proxy by UPM?? Status? >> - MiWi Chapter >> - Where are Advanced Middleware, 2D-UI, 3D-UI, >> Synchronization, Cloud Rendering, Display as a Service, GIS Data >> Provider, POI Data Provider, 2D-3D-Capture, Augmented Reality, >> Real-Virtual Interaction, Virtual Character, Interface >> Designer? Status? >> >> Best regards, >> Arian >> >> >> >> ------------------------------__------------------------------__------------ >> >> >> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede >> consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo >> electr?nico >> en el enlace situado m?s abajo. >> This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We >> only send >> and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: >> http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/__disclaimer.aspx >> >> _________________________________________________ >> Fiware mailing list >> Fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu >> > > >> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/__listinfo/fiware >> >> >> >> >> >> _________________________________________________ >> Fiware-miwi mailing list >> Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu >> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/__listinfo/fiware-miwi >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> ------------------------------__------------------------------__------------- >> Deutsches Forschungszentrum f?r K?nstliche Intelligenz (DFKI) GmbH >> Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern >> >> Gesch?ftsf?hrung: >> Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender) >> Dr. Walter Olthoff >> Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: >> Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes >> >> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Kaiserslautern (HRB 2313) >> USt-Id.Nr.: DE 148646973, Steuernummer: 19/673/0060/3 >> ------------------------------__------------------------------__--------------- >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Fiware-miwi mailing list >> Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu >> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila >> VP, Technology >> Cyberlightning Ltd. >> >> mobile. +358 405245142 >> email. jarkko at cyberlightning.com >> >> Go to www.cybersli.de and enrich your >> presentations! >> >> www.cyberlightning.com > > > -- > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Deutsches Forschungszentrum f?r K?nstliche Intelligenz (DFKI) GmbH > Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern > > Gesch?ftsf?hrung: > Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender) > Dr. Walter Olthoff > Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: > Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes > > Sitz der Gesellschaft: Kaiserslautern (HRB 2313) > USt-Id.Nr.: DE 148646973, Steuernummer: 19/673/0060/3 > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-miwi mailing list > Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE_M30_Review_WP13_partnername.pptx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentation Size: 168943 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lasse.oorni at ludocraft.com Mon Dec 16 19:18:22 2013 From: lasse.oorni at ludocraft.com (=?iso-8859-1?Q?=22Lasse_=D6=F6rni=22?=) Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 20:18:22 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-miwi] miwi GE infos (Fwd: [Fiware] QUITE IMPORTANT AND URGENT: RE: GEs to discuss in the review meeting) In-Reply-To: <70EAB876-63E6-461A-92EA-1063FCDB9859@zhaw.ch> References: <52AB72ED.9040600@tid.es> <9AED604A-EDCC-4CBF-A3F4-88DA91DC703C@playsign.net> <52AD4F82.7010303@dfki.de> <22228ee4df844a4bb7a53cd8e9b05805@SRV-MAIL-001.zhaw.ch> <70EAB876-63E6-461A-92EA-1063FCDB9859@zhaw.ch> Message-ID: <298288c26781864d65ba726071e0946a.squirrel@urho.ludocraft.com> Hi, LudoCraft's slide attached here. -- Lasse ??rni Game Programmer LudoCraft Ltd. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE_M30_Review_WP13_LudoCraft.pptx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentation Size: 168059 bytes Desc: not available URL: From Philipp.Slusallek at dfki.de Tue Dec 17 07:16:01 2013 From: Philipp.Slusallek at dfki.de (Philipp Slusallek) Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 07:16:01 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-miwi] miwi GE infos (Fwd: [Fiware] QUITE IMPORTANT AND URGENT: RE: GEs to discuss in the review meeting) In-Reply-To: <70EAB876-63E6-461A-92EA-1063FCDB9859@zhaw.ch> References: <52AB72ED.9040600@tid.es> <9AED604A-EDCC-4CBF-A3F4-88DA91DC703C@playsign.net> <52AD4F82.7010303@dfki.de> <22228ee4df844a4bb7a53cd8e9b05805@SRV-MAIL-001.zhaw.ch> <70EAB876-63E6-461A-92EA-1063FCDB9859@zhaw.ch> Message-ID: <52AFEC21.2040207@dfki.de> Hi, I have updated the table for 3D-UI, DaaS, and KIARA and attached is the slide for DFKI (had to modify the layout slightly to fit things on the slide, so please copy with layout intact). The only issue that I could possibly see with our GEs are the OSS issues with respect to DaaS due to the patent agreement with the University. We will have several discussion with them early next year and I hope that this will be resolved then. Otherwise we are well on track to release our parts. This is also true with respect to the KIARA middleware, even though no contributions of the other partners have been made available or integrated yet. I am no longer willing to accept this without comments and so this information is in the table. Please leave it there! Best, Philipp Am 16.12.2013 18:05, schrieb Christof Marti: > Dear WP13 GE owners and partners > > Sorry for coming back to you so late. > It was not exactly clear how the questions will be addressed at the > review meeting on Wednesday. > I joined now the rehearsal meeting in Brussels (after an traveling for > 7h because of delayed and missed flights), where we prepare the content > for the review. > After todays discussion, the structure is more clear now. > > I will present the status of WP13 and all its GEs in a very short slot > (max 5 min.) > Therefore I would like to have *1 slide* with a short overview *per GE*, > in table-form with the following fields: > (these should only relate to the FI-WARE GEis features / not commercial > additions) > > * GE-Name: generic name of the GE > * GEI-Name: name of the specific implementation > * Partner(s) involved: > * Terms&Conditions: (Exact type of license for the GEi: commercial > xxx, ?, Apache 2, MIT, GPLv2,.?) > * Status (Open API): now (not avail yet, early draft, draft, > preliminary, final), reason why and why available. > * Current status: What is available at this moment > * What?s available in M33 (R3.2): 2-3 major features (or full > functionality) > * What?s available in M36 (R3.3): additional features (or full > functionality) > * Planned to be available in FI-LAB? yes/no (how: blue-print, vm > image, global instance, demo app) > * Demo-Links > > To add this I prepared a Google Spreadsheet. Please complete it for your GE. > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Auieh_fs3EUxdEhYRnVwN3lzcHF1dFU3elh0R2ZTd1E#gid=0 > (I will then see, if I can compact and reduce the amount of data, > columns, ? for the slide) > > I will add *a summary slide* of the WP13 status at all: > Common points, OpenSpecification, Manuals, deliverables, ? > (I also have a Word version of the OpenSpecification with me) > > Then I would like to prepare *1 slide per partner* where he can elaborate on > > * Examination plans > * Dissemination activities (executed, planned) > * Other comments (planned usage of UC-projects, reasons why something > might get delayed, ?) > > Not sure if it will be used, but in case there are questions I can > select the slide and show it. > Please use the attached template for your slide. > > I saw some of you sent already some content. It?s fastest if you add it to > > *Deadline for all of the above is: Tomorrow Tuesday noon (12:00)* > (the earlier the better, because I also have to put it together to a > nice presentation) > > Thanks for your support. > > Best regards > Christof > ---- > InIT Cloud Computing Lab - ICCLab http://cloudcomp.ch > Institut of Applied Information Technology - InIT > Zurich University of Applied Sciences - ZHAW > School of Engineering > Phone: +41 58 934 70 63 > Skype: christof-marti > > Am 15.12.2013 um 14:48 schrieb Philipp Slusallek > >: > >> Hi all, >> >> Am 15.12.2013 12:01, schrieb Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila: >>> Please correct me now if I am wrong, but all the requested information >>> is already available! >> >> Yes and No. Here is my view again in some more detail: >> >> -- The Open Specification are in the private Wiki, but not in the public >> one, which means that the commission could in principle see them, but >> likely will not find them (unless we tell them, which we should do :-). >> Putting your report on a (public Wiki) may be a good starting point for >> this. >> >> -- Outside of FI-WARE or the commission (e.g. use-case projects, general >> public) the Open Spec will not be seen at all. We need to move it to the >> Public Wiki. At the AB meeting on Fri I specifically asked Juanjo to >> speed up this process, as our stuff has been ready for many weeks now >> and people keep asking for it. >> >> -- At the end the commission and the public will be mainly looking at >> the FI-WARE catalog. Our stuff only gets in there if it fulfills certain >> quality criteria. The most important ones are the quality of all the >> other documentation we are preparing right now, including software and >> examples to test things out, T&C, etc. >> >> -- For the FI-LAB catalog we also need the Blueprints for automatic >> installation. This is mandatory for server-based components but I >> suggest that we also provide them for client-based software by >> requesting a Web-server blueprint (probably available already) and >> deploying the SW and examples to it. >> >> Christof, feel free to correct me or add things I missed. >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Philipp >> >>> You all know what is in the Open Specification. Up to this date, they >>> are as ready as they can be. We are having tracker, and feature sets, >>> and we have scheduled the development. From the schedule it can be seen >>> that everything what we plan is going to be ready in January, with minor >>> issues being patched after it. There are also installation and user >>> guides. At least on behalf of Cyber and CIE, those are up to date and >>> collectively already describe everything required. To emphasize: those >>> guides already make a number of references to github source code >>> repositories (which is allowed) and we already have a number of demos >>> online and they are collectively described in one place. This place is >>> now in the "interim payment" document, which contains demo links from >>> Cyber and Playsign. Other parties did not deliver anything for it. >>> >>> So, given this, in my opinion the only thing we might be lacking is the >>> collective list of demo links in Wiki. Obviously the interim report is >>> not enough (since it is not public), and hence it should be published >>> somewhere in the Wiki. >>> >>> Other thing we are missing still is the FI-LAB components. Those will >>> come together with January release, in one form or another. >>> >>> Am I missing something? :) Maybe the other thing we need to be >>> collectively doing, is a summarizing report of the progress, of which >>> naturally contains a summary of the current Wiki status. >>> >>> - jarkko >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 8:43 AM, Philipp Slusallek >>> >>> > wrote: >>> >>> Hi Toni, all, >>> >>> I and Juanjo were at the Architecture Board meeting in Madrid >>> Thu/Fri when that message arrived and did briefly talk about it. >>> >>> Here is my perspective based on the discussion with Juanjo: It is >>> not a major issue. The point is listed last and we assume that Arian >>> is just wondering when the GEs will become available as there is >>> little information on this available yet (as discussed before). >>> >>> >>> However, there are a few things that we should do: >>> >>> -- Put together a list of our GEs that will be ready for the January >>> release. Please all respond as quickly as possible by email, maybe >>> we can set up a document somewhere where we can collect the >>> information. >>> >>> -- For GEs that will not be ready for January we should have a good >>> explanation. >>> >>> -- This list should be sent to Juanjo on Monday (before their review >>> on Tuesday) !! >>> >>> -- As agreed with Christof we need to push for information being >>> made publicly available on FI-WARE Wiki and need to put them in the >>> FI-WARE Catalog as well. >>> >>> -- GEs should also be available on FI-LAB. There they will only be >>> accepted on FI-LAB when their quality is high enough. We need to >>> make sure it is. This also requires setting up blueprints (at least >>> for SEs that need to be installed on a server, which can also mean >>> Web server + JS libraries). >>> >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Philipp >>> >>> Am 14.12.2013 14:54, schrieb Toni Alatalo: >>> >>> Was just wondering about this ? is this simply due to WP13 GEs not >>> having been part of any official fi-ware release yet? >>> >>> Or is something missing about the status of our GEs? Many of >>> them are >>> already available in work-in-progress pre-release mode, on >>> github. Just >>> wanted to mention Christof that if you need help in gathering >>> MIWI GE >>> status, links to the source codes and info about commercial >>> exploitation >>> etc. we can quite easily do that. And demo links ofc. >>> >>> For example, CIEs POI backend: >>> GE is available from >>> https://github.com/Chiru/WeX/__tree/master/poi >>> >>> and live demo at >>> http://chiru.cie.fi/FI-WARE/__demos/POI/map_demo/ >>> >>> >>> etc. for almost all MIWI GEs. But right now I?m afraid that info >>> is not >>> gathered anywhere (that demo link for what the guys showed at >>> the F2F I >>> asked and got by private email) ? would be good to have in the >>> wiki in >>> any case I figure. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> ~Toni >>> >>> Begin forwarded message: >>> >>> *From: *Juanjo Hierro >>> >> >> >>> *Subject: **[Fiware] QUITE IMPORTANT AND URGENT: RE: GEs to >>> discuss in >>> the review meeting* >>> *Date: *13 Dec 2013 22:49:49 GMT+2 >>> *To: *"fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu >>> >>> >>> >> >" >>> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >>> Dear FI-WARE GEi owners, >>> >>> We have got a very clear response from our PO, Arian >>> Zweger, about >>> what are the concrete GEis which are going to be particularly >>> questioned during the month 30 project review next week. >>> >>> Please react accordingly so that: >>> >>> * you provide your WPL the necessary information that >>> will allow him >>> >>> to answer any potential question at the review; or >>> * let us know INMEDIATELY whether you will attend the >>> meeting >>> >>> personally, as to be able to respond any questions >>> directly >>> >>> Note that, regarding the first set of GEis, Arian >>> mentions that the >>> EC and reviewers wish to explore whether it is worthwhile to >>> continue >>> funding development. >>> >>> Some questions that I wouldn't be surprised if the >>> PO/reviewers make: >>> >>> * What are your commercial plans around the GEis beyond >>> the FI-PPP ? >>> * (for those cases were the GEi is not being offered as >>> open >>> >>> source): what are the FRAND terms under which you plan >>> to deliver >>> your GEi beyond the FI-PPP ? >>> * If you are not involved in any proposal focused on >>> continuation of >>> >>> the Technology Foundation (FI-WARE) ... how do you plan >>> to provide >>> lab support of your GEi to SMEs in phase 3 or even UC >>> projects in >>> phase 2 trials ? How doy you plan to provide level 1 >>> and 2 >>> support of you GEi if deployed on FI-Lab ? >>> >>> Besides this, there are a number of questions regarding >>> GEis in >>> several chapters that WPLs/WPAs should prepare a response for. >>> >>> For those who didn't follow the details about the next >>> month 30 >>> project review, these are the logistics: >>> >>> Reharsal: Rehearsal: 16-17/Dec. Telef?nica?s office >>> (Avenue des >>> Arts, 20).The meeting will start at 11:15-12:00 on >>> Monday. >>> Review: 18^th December 2013, avenue de Beaulieu BU25 0/S2 >>> >>> agenda of the >>> >>> >>> review:https://docs.google.__com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=__0AmxBgS-__lWT4vdDB6NXJzMHVubDg1Zko5VG5Bb__zAzSnc#gid=0 >>> >>> >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> -- Juanjo Hierro >>> >>> P.D.: A note about the list below ... apartently, the DCA >>> GEi was in >>> the list because of an inconsistent message in the catalogue >>> (it was >>> mentioned that the product was going to be licensed as open >>> source >>> while at the same time it was stated that it could be used >>> under >>> certain terms and conditions). This has already been fixed. >>> >>> ------------- >>> Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital >>> website:www.tid.es >>> email:jhierro at tid.es >>> > >>> twitter:twitter.com/__JuanjoHierro >>> >>> >> > >>> >>> >>> FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator >>> and Chief Architect >>> >>> FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman >>> >>> You can follow FI-WARE at: >>> website:http://www.fi-ware.eu >>> >>> >>> facebook:http://www.facebook.__com/pages/FI-WARE/__251366491587242 >>> >>> twitter:http://twitter.com/__FIware >>> >>> >>> linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.__com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 >>> >>> >>> >>> -------- Original Message -------- >>> Subject: RE: GEs to discuss in the review meeting >>> Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 14:33:44 +0000 >>> From: >> >>> > >>> To: > >>> CC: >>> >,>> >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> Dear Miguel, >>> >>> As requested, please find a list below. >>> >>> The question for the first group is*whether it is >>> worthwhile to >>> continue funding development of:* >>> >>> - Data Chapter >>> - Compressed Domain Video Analysis, Codoan >>> / Siemens >>> - Metadata Preprocessing, MetadataProcessor >>> / Siemens >>> - Media-enhanced Query Broker, QueryBroker >>> / Siemens >>> - Apps Chapter >>> - (Service Composition, Ericsson >>> Composition Editor >>> (ECE) / Ericsson) >>> - Service Mashup, Mashup Factory / DT >>> - Mediator, Mediator_TI / Telecom Italia >>> - IoT Chapter >>> - (Backend) Configuration Management, IoT >>> Discovery - UNIS >>> - (Backend) IoT Broker, IoT Broker - NEC >>> - (Backend) Device Management, IDAS DCA - TID >>> - (Gateway) Protocol Adapter, ZPA / Telecom >>> Italia / >>> EPCGE / Orange >>> - Security Chapter >>> - Security Monitoring / Android Vulnerability >>> Assessment, Ovaldroid / Inria >>> - Identity Management, GCP / DT >>> - Identity Management, One-IDM / NSN >>> - Identity Management, DigitalSelf / NSN >>> - Malware Detection Service (Opt), Morphus >>> / Inria >>> - I2ND Chapter >>> - Cloud Proxy >>> - (I2ND) Network Information and Control >>> (NetIC-VNP), >>> Altoclient/ALU-D >>> - (I2ND) Network Information and Control >>> (NetIC-OFNIC), VNP/NSN >>> - (I2ND) Network Information and Control >>> (NetIC-altoclient), VNEIC/ALU-I >>> - (I2ND) Service Connectivity Capability >>> and Control >>> (S3C), S3C / DT >>> - Tools >>> - Trace Analyzer, IBM Israel >>> >>> Then there are*specific questions*for the second group: >>> >>> - Cloud Chapter >>> - Why having a DCRM by IBM and one by >>> Intel? Differences? >>> - Object Storage GEi by IBM:?? Status? >>> - Edgelets Manager by Thales: not in the >>> Catalogue? >>> - Data Chapter >>> - UDA ? unstructured data analysis by >>> ATOS?? Status? >>> - Apps Chapter >>> - Relation Mediator_TI by Telecom Italia >>> and SETHA2 by >>> Thales? >>> - IoT Chapter >>> - (Gateway) Device Management, Gateway Device >>> Management / Franhoufer: not in the Catalogue? >>> - Test and evaluation server environment >>> for NGSI by >>> SAP?? Status? >>> - Template Handler by SAP?? Status? >>> - Security Chapter >>> - KeyRock by UPM?? Status? >>> - Access Proxy by UPM?? Status? >>> - MiWi Chapter >>> - Where are Advanced Middleware, 2D-UI, >>> 3D-UI, >>> Synchronization, Cloud Rendering, Display as a Service, >>> GIS Data >>> Provider, POI Data Provider, 2D-3D-Capture, Augmented Reality, >>> Real-Virtual Interaction, Virtual Character, Interface >>> Designer? Status? >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Arian >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------__------------------------------__------------ >>> >>> >>> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede >>> consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo >>> electr?nico >>> en el enlace situado m?s abajo. >>> This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We >>> only send >>> and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: >>> http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/__disclaimer.aspx >>> >>> _________________________________________________ >>> Fiware mailing list >>> Fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu >>> >>> >> > >>> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/__listinfo/fiware >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _________________________________________________ >>> Fiware-miwi mailing list >>> Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu >>> >>> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/__listinfo/fiware-miwi >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------__------------------------------__------------- >>> Deutsches Forschungszentrum f?r K?nstliche Intelligenz (DFKI) GmbH >>> Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern >>> >>> Gesch?ftsf?hrung: >>> Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender) >>> Dr. Walter Olthoff >>> Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: >>> Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes >>> >>> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Kaiserslautern (HRB 2313) >>> USt-Id.Nr.: DE 148646973, Steuernummer: 19/673/0060/3 >>> >>> ------------------------------__------------------------------__--------------- >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Fiware-miwi mailing list >>> Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu >>> >>> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila >>> VP, Technology >>> Cyberlightning Ltd. >>> >>> mobile. +358 405245142 >>> email. jarkko at cyberlightning.com >>> >>> >>> Go to www.cybersli.de >>> and enrich your >>> presentations! >>> >>> www.cyberlightning.com >>> >> >> >> -- >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Deutsches Forschungszentrum f?r K?nstliche Intelligenz (DFKI) GmbH >> Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern >> >> Gesch?ftsf?hrung: >> Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender) >> Dr. Walter Olthoff >> Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: >> Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes >> >> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Kaiserslautern (HRB 2313) >> USt-Id.Nr.: DE 148646973, Steuernummer: 19/673/0060/3 >> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> _______________________________________________ >> Fiware-miwi mailing list >> Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu >> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-miwi mailing list > Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi > -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Deutsches Forschungszentrum f?r K?nstliche Intelligenz (DFKI) GmbH Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern Gesch?ftsf?hrung: Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender) Dr. Walter Olthoff Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes Sitz der Gesellschaft: Kaiserslautern (HRB 2313) USt-Id.Nr.: DE 148646973, Steuernummer: 19/673/0060/3 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE_M30_Review_WP13_DFKI.pptx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentation Size: 168441 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: slusallek.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 441 bytes Desc: not available URL: From toni at playsign.net Tue Dec 17 08:18:19 2013 From: toni at playsign.net (Toni Alatalo) Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 09:18:19 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-miwi] miwi GE infos (Fwd: [Fiware] QUITE IMPORTANT AND URGENT: RE: GEs to discuss in the review meeting) In-Reply-To: <70EAB876-63E6-461A-92EA-1063FCDB9859@zhaw.ch> References: <52AB72ED.9040600@tid.es> <9AED604A-EDCC-4CBF-A3F4-88DA91DC703C@playsign.net> <52AD4F82.7010303@dfki.de> <22228ee4df844a4bb7a53cd8e9b05805@SRV-MAIL-001.zhaw.ch> <70EAB876-63E6-461A-92EA-1063FCDB9859@zhaw.ch> Message-ID: <1B0DB706-6A9C-4A1D-9929-2DE880FDDADD@playsign.net> Hi, the table is now updated for our part of the 3DUI work and the company status slide is attached. Cheers, ~Toni On 16 Dec 2013, at 19:05, Christof Marti wrote: > Dear WP13 GE owners and partners > > Sorry for coming back to you so late. > It was not exactly clear how the questions will be addressed at the review meeting on Wednesday. > I joined now the rehearsal meeting in Brussels (after an traveling for 7h because of delayed and missed flights), where we prepare the content for the review. > After todays discussion, the structure is more clear now. > > I will present the status of WP13 and all its GEs in a very short slot (max 5 min.) > Therefore I would like to have 1 slide with a short overview per GE, in table-form with the following fields: > (these should only relate to the FI-WARE GEis features / not commercial additions) > GE-Name: generic name of the GE > GEI-Name: name of the specific implementation > Partner(s) involved: > Terms&Conditions: (Exact type of license for the GEi: commercial xxx, ?, Apache 2, MIT, GPLv2,.?) > Status (Open API): now (not avail yet, early draft, draft, preliminary, final), reason why and why available. > Current status: What is available at this moment > What?s available in M33 (R3.2): 2-3 major features (or full functionality) > What?s available in M36 (R3.3): additional features (or full functionality) > Planned to be available in FI-LAB? yes/no (how: blue-print, vm image, global instance, demo app) > Demo-Links > To add this I prepared a Google Spreadsheet. Please complete it for your GE. > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Auieh_fs3EUxdEhYRnVwN3lzcHF1dFU3elh0R2ZTd1E#gid=0 > (I will then see, if I can compact and reduce the amount of data, columns, ? for the slide) > > I will add a summary slide of the WP13 status at all: > Common points, OpenSpecification, Manuals, deliverables, ? > (I also have a Word version of the OpenSpecification with me) > > Then I would like to prepare 1 slide per partner where he can elaborate on > Examination plans > Dissemination activities (executed, planned) > Other comments (planned usage of UC-projects, reasons why something might get delayed, ?) > Not sure if it will be used, but in case there are questions I can select the slide and show it. > Please use the attached template for your slide. > > I saw some of you sent already some content. It?s fastest if you add it to > > Deadline for all of the above is: Tomorrow Tuesday noon (12:00) > (the earlier the better, because I also have to put it together to a nice presentation) > > Thanks for your support. > > Best regards > Christof > ---- > InIT Cloud Computing Lab - ICCLab http://cloudcomp.ch > Institut of Applied Information Technology - InIT > Zurich University of Applied Sciences - ZHAW > School of Engineering > Phone: +41 58 934 70 63 > Skype: christof-marti > > Am 15.12.2013 um 14:48 schrieb Philipp Slusallek : > >> Hi all, >> >> Am 15.12.2013 12:01, schrieb Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila: >>> Please correct me now if I am wrong, but all the requested information >>> is already available! >> >> Yes and No. Here is my view again in some more detail: >> >> -- The Open Specification are in the private Wiki, but not in the public >> one, which means that the commission could in principle see them, but >> likely will not find them (unless we tell them, which we should do :-). >> Putting your report on a (public Wiki) may be a good starting point for >> this. >> >> -- Outside of FI-WARE or the commission (e.g. use-case projects, general >> public) the Open Spec will not be seen at all. We need to move it to the >> Public Wiki. At the AB meeting on Fri I specifically asked Juanjo to >> speed up this process, as our stuff has been ready for many weeks now >> and people keep asking for it. >> >> -- At the end the commission and the public will be mainly looking at >> the FI-WARE catalog. Our stuff only gets in there if it fulfills certain >> quality criteria. The most important ones are the quality of all the >> other documentation we are preparing right now, including software and >> examples to test things out, T&C, etc. >> >> -- For the FI-LAB catalog we also need the Blueprints for automatic >> installation. This is mandatory for server-based components but I >> suggest that we also provide them for client-based software by >> requesting a Web-server blueprint (probably available already) and >> deploying the SW and examples to it. >> >> Christof, feel free to correct me or add things I missed. >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Philipp >> >>> You all know what is in the Open Specification. Up to this date, they >>> are as ready as they can be. We are having tracker, and feature sets, >>> and we have scheduled the development. From the schedule it can be seen >>> that everything what we plan is going to be ready in January, with minor >>> issues being patched after it. There are also installation and user >>> guides. At least on behalf of Cyber and CIE, those are up to date and >>> collectively already describe everything required. To emphasize: those >>> guides already make a number of references to github source code >>> repositories (which is allowed) and we already have a number of demos >>> online and they are collectively described in one place. This place is >>> now in the "interim payment" document, which contains demo links from >>> Cyber and Playsign. Other parties did not deliver anything for it. >>> >>> So, given this, in my opinion the only thing we might be lacking is the >>> collective list of demo links in Wiki. Obviously the interim report is >>> not enough (since it is not public), and hence it should be published >>> somewhere in the Wiki. >>> >>> Other thing we are missing still is the FI-LAB components. Those will >>> come together with January release, in one form or another. >>> >>> Am I missing something? :) Maybe the other thing we need to be >>> collectively doing, is a summarizing report of the progress, of which >>> naturally contains a summary of the current Wiki status. >>> >>> - jarkko >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 8:43 AM, Philipp Slusallek >>> > wrote: >>> >>> Hi Toni, all, >>> >>> I and Juanjo were at the Architecture Board meeting in Madrid >>> Thu/Fri when that message arrived and did briefly talk about it. >>> >>> Here is my perspective based on the discussion with Juanjo: It is >>> not a major issue. The point is listed last and we assume that Arian >>> is just wondering when the GEs will become available as there is >>> little information on this available yet (as discussed before). >>> >>> >>> However, there are a few things that we should do: >>> >>> -- Put together a list of our GEs that will be ready for the January >>> release. Please all respond as quickly as possible by email, maybe >>> we can set up a document somewhere where we can collect the information. >>> >>> -- For GEs that will not be ready for January we should have a good >>> explanation. >>> >>> -- This list should be sent to Juanjo on Monday (before their review >>> on Tuesday) !! >>> >>> -- As agreed with Christof we need to push for information being >>> made publicly available on FI-WARE Wiki and need to put them in the >>> FI-WARE Catalog as well. >>> >>> -- GEs should also be available on FI-LAB. There they will only be >>> accepted on FI-LAB when their quality is high enough. We need to >>> make sure it is. This also requires setting up blueprints (at least >>> for SEs that need to be installed on a server, which can also mean >>> Web server + JS libraries). >>> >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Philipp >>> >>> Am 14.12.2013 14:54, schrieb Toni Alatalo: >>> >>> Was just wondering about this ? is this simply due to WP13 GEs not >>> having been part of any official fi-ware release yet? >>> >>> Or is something missing about the status of our GEs? Many of >>> them are >>> already available in work-in-progress pre-release mode, on >>> github. Just >>> wanted to mention Christof that if you need help in gathering >>> MIWI GE >>> status, links to the source codes and info about commercial >>> exploitation >>> etc. we can quite easily do that. And demo links ofc. >>> >>> For example, CIEs POI backend: >>> GE is available from >>> https://github.com/Chiru/WeX/__tree/master/poi >>> >>> and live demo at >>> http://chiru.cie.fi/FI-WARE/__demos/POI/map_demo/ >>> >>> >>> etc. for almost all MIWI GEs. But right now I?m afraid that info >>> is not >>> gathered anywhere (that demo link for what the guys showed at >>> the F2F I >>> asked and got by private email) ? would be good to have in the >>> wiki in >>> any case I figure. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> ~Toni >>> >>> Begin forwarded message: >>> >>> *From: *Juanjo Hierro >> >> >> >>> *Subject: **[Fiware] QUITE IMPORTANT AND URGENT: RE: GEs to >>> discuss in >>> the review meeting* >>> *Date: *13 Dec 2013 22:49:49 GMT+2 >>> *To: *"fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu >>> >>> >> >" >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >>> Dear FI-WARE GEi owners, >>> >>> We have got a very clear response from our PO, Arian >>> Zweger, about >>> what are the concrete GEis which are going to be particularly >>> questioned during the month 30 project review next week. >>> >>> Please react accordingly so that: >>> >>> * you provide your WPL the necessary information that >>> will allow him >>> >>> to answer any potential question at the review; or >>> * let us know INMEDIATELY whether you will attend the meeting >>> >>> personally, as to be able to respond any questions directly >>> >>> Note that, regarding the first set of GEis, Arian >>> mentions that the >>> EC and reviewers wish to explore whether it is worthwhile to >>> continue >>> funding development. >>> >>> Some questions that I wouldn't be surprised if the >>> PO/reviewers make: >>> >>> * What are your commercial plans around the GEis beyond >>> the FI-PPP ? >>> * (for those cases were the GEi is not being offered as open >>> >>> source): what are the FRAND terms under which you plan >>> to deliver >>> your GEi beyond the FI-PPP ? >>> * If you are not involved in any proposal focused on >>> continuation of >>> >>> the Technology Foundation (FI-WARE) ... how do you plan >>> to provide >>> lab support of your GEi to SMEs in phase 3 or even UC >>> projects in >>> phase 2 trials ? How doy you plan to provide level 1 >>> and 2 >>> support of you GEi if deployed on FI-Lab ? >>> >>> Besides this, there are a number of questions regarding >>> GEis in >>> several chapters that WPLs/WPAs should prepare a response for. >>> >>> For those who didn't follow the details about the next >>> month 30 >>> project review, these are the logistics: >>> >>> Reharsal: Rehearsal: 16-17/Dec. Telef?nica?s office >>> (Avenue des >>> Arts, 20).The meeting will start at 11:15-12:00 on Monday. >>> Review: 18^th December 2013, avenue de Beaulieu BU25 0/S2 >>> >>> agenda of the >>> >>> review:https://docs.google.__com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=__0AmxBgS-__lWT4vdDB6NXJzMHVubDg1Zko5VG5Bb__zAzSnc#gid=0 >>> >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> -- Juanjo Hierro >>> >>> P.D.: A note about the list below ... apartently, the DCA >>> GEi was in >>> the list because of an inconsistent message in the catalogue >>> (it was >>> mentioned that the product was going to be licensed as open >>> source >>> while at the same time it was stated that it could be used under >>> certain terms and conditions). This has already been fixed. >>> >>> ------------- >>> Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital >>> website:www.tid.es >>> email:jhierro at tid.es >>> twitter:twitter.com/__JuanjoHierro >>> >>> >> > >>> >>> >>> FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator >>> and Chief Architect >>> >>> FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman >>> >>> You can follow FI-WARE at: >>> website:http://www.fi-ware.eu >>> >>> facebook:http://www.facebook.__com/pages/FI-WARE/__251366491587242 >>> twitter:http://twitter.com/__FIware >>> >>> linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.__com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 >>> >>> >>> >>> -------- Original Message -------- >>> Subject: RE: GEs to discuss in the review meeting >>> Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 14:33:44 +0000 >>> From: >> > >>> To: > >>> CC: >> >,>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> Dear Miguel, >>> >>> As requested, please find a list below. >>> >>> The question for the first group is*whether it is worthwhile to >>> continue funding development of:* >>> >>> - Data Chapter >>> - Compressed Domain Video Analysis, Codoan >>> / Siemens >>> - Metadata Preprocessing, MetadataProcessor >>> / Siemens >>> - Media-enhanced Query Broker, QueryBroker >>> / Siemens >>> - Apps Chapter >>> - (Service Composition, Ericsson >>> Composition Editor >>> (ECE) / Ericsson) >>> - Service Mashup, Mashup Factory / DT >>> - Mediator, Mediator_TI / Telecom Italia >>> - IoT Chapter >>> - (Backend) Configuration Management, IoT >>> Discovery - UNIS >>> - (Backend) IoT Broker, IoT Broker - NEC >>> - (Backend) Device Management, IDAS DCA - TID >>> - (Gateway) Protocol Adapter, ZPA / Telecom >>> Italia / >>> EPCGE / Orange >>> - Security Chapter >>> - Security Monitoring / Android Vulnerability >>> Assessment, Ovaldroid / Inria >>> - Identity Management, GCP / DT >>> - Identity Management, One-IDM / NSN >>> - Identity Management, DigitalSelf / NSN >>> - Malware Detection Service (Opt), Morphus >>> / Inria >>> - I2ND Chapter >>> - Cloud Proxy >>> - (I2ND) Network Information and Control >>> (NetIC-VNP), >>> Altoclient/ALU-D >>> - (I2ND) Network Information and Control >>> (NetIC-OFNIC), VNP/NSN >>> - (I2ND) Network Information and Control >>> (NetIC-altoclient), VNEIC/ALU-I >>> - (I2ND) Service Connectivity Capability >>> and Control >>> (S3C), S3C / DT >>> - Tools >>> - Trace Analyzer, IBM Israel >>> >>> Then there are*specific questions*for the second group: >>> >>> - Cloud Chapter >>> - Why having a DCRM by IBM and one by >>> Intel? Differences? >>> - Object Storage GEi by IBM:?? Status? >>> - Edgelets Manager by Thales: not in the >>> Catalogue? >>> - Data Chapter >>> - UDA ? unstructured data analysis by >>> ATOS?? Status? >>> - Apps Chapter >>> - Relation Mediator_TI by Telecom Italia >>> and SETHA2 by >>> Thales? >>> - IoT Chapter >>> - (Gateway) Device Management, Gateway Device >>> Management / Franhoufer: not in the Catalogue? >>> - Test and evaluation server environment >>> for NGSI by >>> SAP?? Status? >>> - Template Handler by SAP?? Status? >>> - Security Chapter >>> - KeyRock by UPM?? Status? >>> - Access Proxy by UPM?? Status? >>> - MiWi Chapter >>> - Where are Advanced Middleware, 2D-UI, 3D-UI, >>> Synchronization, Cloud Rendering, Display as a Service, GIS Data >>> Provider, POI Data Provider, 2D-3D-Capture, Augmented Reality, >>> Real-Virtual Interaction, Virtual Character, Interface >>> Designer? Status? >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Arian >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------__------------------------------__------------ >>> >>> >>> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede >>> consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo >>> electr?nico >>> en el enlace situado m?s abajo. >>> This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We >>> only send >>> and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: >>> http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/__disclaimer.aspx >>> >>> _________________________________________________ >>> Fiware mailing list >>> Fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu >>> >> > >>> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/__listinfo/fiware >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _________________________________________________ >>> Fiware-miwi mailing list >>> Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu >>> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/__listinfo/fiware-miwi >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> ------------------------------__------------------------------__------------- >>> Deutsches Forschungszentrum f?r K?nstliche Intelligenz (DFKI) GmbH >>> Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern >>> >>> Gesch?ftsf?hrung: >>> Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender) >>> Dr. Walter Olthoff >>> Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: >>> Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes >>> >>> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Kaiserslautern (HRB 2313) >>> USt-Id.Nr.: DE 148646973, Steuernummer: 19/673/0060/3 >>> ------------------------------__------------------------------__--------------- >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Fiware-miwi mailing list >>> Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu >>> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila >>> VP, Technology >>> Cyberlightning Ltd. >>> >>> mobile. +358 405245142 >>> email. jarkko at cyberlightning.com >>> >>> Go to www.cybersli.de and enrich your >>> presentations! >>> >>> www.cyberlightning.com >> >> >> -- >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Deutsches Forschungszentrum f?r K?nstliche Intelligenz (DFKI) GmbH >> Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern >> >> Gesch?ftsf?hrung: >> Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender) >> Dr. Walter Olthoff >> Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: >> Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes >> >> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Kaiserslautern (HRB 2313) >> USt-Id.Nr.: DE 148646973, Steuernummer: 19/673/0060/3 >> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> _______________________________________________ >> Fiware-miwi mailing list >> Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu >> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-miwi mailing list > Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE_M30_Review_WP13_Playsign.pptx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentation Size: 168206 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From arto.heikkinen at cie.fi Tue Dec 17 09:30:48 2013 From: arto.heikkinen at cie.fi (Arto Heikkinen) Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 10:30:48 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-miwi] miwi GE infos (Fwd: [Fiware] QUITE IMPORTANT AND URGENT: RE: GEs to discuss in the review meeting) In-Reply-To: <70EAB876-63E6-461A-92EA-1063FCDB9859@zhaw.ch> References: <52AB72ED.9040600@tid.es> <9AED604A-EDCC-4CBF-A3F4-88DA91DC703C@playsign.net> <52AD4F82.7010303@dfki.de> <22228ee4df844a4bb7a53cd8e9b05805@SRV-MAIL-001.zhaw.ch> <70EAB876-63E6-461A-92EA-1063FCDB9859@zhaw.ch> Message-ID: <52B00BB8.7060003@cie.fi> Hi, UOULU/CIE's slide attached to this message. -Arto On 16.12.2013 19:05, Christof Marti wrote: > Dear WP13 GE owners and partners > > Sorry for coming back to you so late. > It was not exactly clear how the questions will be addressed at the > review meeting on Wednesday. > I joined now the rehearsal meeting in Brussels (after an traveling for > 7h because of delayed and missed flights), where we prepare the > content for the review. > After todays discussion, the structure is more clear now. > > I will present the status of WP13 and all its GEs in a very short slot > (max 5 min.) > Therefore I would like to have *1 slide* with a short overview *per > GE*, in table-form with the following fields: > (these should only relate to the FI-WARE GEis features / not > commercial additions) > > * GE-Name: generic name of the GE > * GEI-Name: name of the specific implementation > * Partner(s) involved: > * Terms&Conditions: (Exact type of license for the GEi: commercial > xxx, ..., Apache 2, MIT, GPLv2,....) > * Status (Open API): now (not avail yet, early draft, draft, > preliminary, final), reason why and why available. > * Current status: What is available at this moment > * What's available in M33 (R3.2): 2-3 major features (or full > functionality) > * What's available in M36 (R3.3): additional features (or full > functionality) > * Planned to be available in FI-LAB? yes/no (how: blue-print, vm > image, global instance, demo app) > * Demo-Links > > To add this I prepared a Google Spreadsheet. Please complete it for > your GE. > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Auieh_fs3EUxdEhYRnVwN3lzcHF1dFU3elh0R2ZTd1E#gid=0 > (I will then see, if I can compact and reduce the amount of data, > columns, ... for the slide) > > I will add *a summary slide* of the WP13 status at all: > Common points, OpenSpecification, Manuals, deliverables, ... > (I also have a Word version of the OpenSpecification with me) > > Then I would like to prepare *1 slide per partner* where he can > elaborate on > > * Examination plans > * Dissemination activities (executed, planned) > * Other comments (planned usage of UC-projects, reasons why > something might get delayed, ...) > > Not sure if it will be used, but in case there are questions I can > select the slide and show it. > Please use the attached template for your slide. > > I saw some of you sent already some content. It's fastest if you add > it to > > *Deadline for all of the above is: Tomorrow Tuesday noon (12:00)* > (the earlier the better, because I also have to put it together to a > nice presentation) > > Thanks for your support. > > Best regards > Christof > ---- > InIT Cloud Computing Lab - ICCLab http://cloudcomp.ch > Institut of Applied Information Technology - InIT > Zurich University of Applied Sciences - ZHAW > School of Engineering > Phone: +41 58 934 70 63 > Skype: christof-marti > > Am 15.12.2013 um 14:48 schrieb Philipp Slusallek > >: > >> Hi all, >> >> Am 15.12.2013 12:01, schrieb Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila: >>> Please correct me now if I am wrong, but all the requested information >>> is already available! >> >> Yes and No. Here is my view again in some more detail: >> >> -- The Open Specification are in the private Wiki, but not in the public >> one, which means that the commission could in principle see them, but >> likely will not find them (unless we tell them, which we should do :-). >> Putting your report on a (public Wiki) may be a good starting point for >> this. >> >> -- Outside of FI-WARE or the commission (e.g. use-case projects, general >> public) the Open Spec will not be seen at all. We need to move it to the >> Public Wiki. At the AB meeting on Fri I specifically asked Juanjo to >> speed up this process, as our stuff has been ready for many weeks now >> and people keep asking for it. >> >> -- At the end the commission and the public will be mainly looking at >> the FI-WARE catalog. Our stuff only gets in there if it fulfills certain >> quality criteria. The most important ones are the quality of all the >> other documentation we are preparing right now, including software and >> examples to test things out, T&C, etc. >> >> -- For the FI-LAB catalog we also need the Blueprints for automatic >> installation. This is mandatory for server-based components but I >> suggest that we also provide them for client-based software by >> requesting a Web-server blueprint (probably available already) and >> deploying the SW and examples to it. >> >> Christof, feel free to correct me or add things I missed. >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Philipp >> >>> You all know what is in the Open Specification. Up to this date, they >>> are as ready as they can be. We are having tracker, and feature sets, >>> and we have scheduled the development. From the schedule it can be seen >>> that everything what we plan is going to be ready in January, with minor >>> issues being patched after it. There are also installation and user >>> guides. At least on behalf of Cyber and CIE, those are up to date and >>> collectively already describe everything required. To emphasize: those >>> guides already make a number of references to github source code >>> repositories (which is allowed) and we already have a number of demos >>> online and they are collectively described in one place. This place is >>> now in the "interim payment" document, which contains demo links from >>> Cyber and Playsign. Other parties did not deliver anything for it. >>> >>> So, given this, in my opinion the only thing we might be lacking is the >>> collective list of demo links in Wiki. Obviously the interim report is >>> not enough (since it is not public), and hence it should be published >>> somewhere in the Wiki. >>> >>> Other thing we are missing still is the FI-LAB components. Those will >>> come together with January release, in one form or another. >>> >>> Am I missing something? :) Maybe the other thing we need to be >>> collectively doing, is a summarizing report of the progress, of which >>> naturally contains a summary of the current Wiki status. >>> >>> - jarkko >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 8:43 AM, Philipp Slusallek >>> >>> > wrote: >>> >>> Hi Toni, all, >>> >>> I and Juanjo were at the Architecture Board meeting in Madrid >>> Thu/Fri when that message arrived and did briefly talk about it. >>> >>> Here is my perspective based on the discussion with Juanjo: It is >>> not a major issue. The point is listed last and we assume that Arian >>> is just wondering when the GEs will become available as there is >>> little information on this available yet (as discussed before). >>> >>> >>> However, there are a few things that we should do: >>> >>> -- Put together a list of our GEs that will be ready for the January >>> release. Please all respond as quickly as possible by email, maybe >>> we can set up a document somewhere where we can collect the >>> information. >>> >>> -- For GEs that will not be ready for January we should have a good >>> explanation. >>> >>> -- This list should be sent to Juanjo on Monday (before their review >>> on Tuesday) !! >>> >>> -- As agreed with Christof we need to push for information being >>> made publicly available on FI-WARE Wiki and need to put them in the >>> FI-WARE Catalog as well. >>> >>> -- GEs should also be available on FI-LAB. There they will only be >>> accepted on FI-LAB when their quality is high enough. We need to >>> make sure it is. This also requires setting up blueprints (at least >>> for SEs that need to be installed on a server, which can also mean >>> Web server + JS libraries). >>> >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Philipp >>> >>> Am 14.12.2013 14:54, schrieb Toni Alatalo: >>> >>> Was just wondering about this --- is this simply due to WP13 >>> GEs not >>> having been part of any official fi-ware release yet? >>> >>> Or is something missing about the status of our GEs? Many of >>> them are >>> already available in work-in-progress pre-release mode, on >>> github. Just >>> wanted to mention Christof that if you need help in gathering >>> MIWI GE >>> status, links to the source codes and info about commercial >>> exploitation >>> etc. we can quite easily do that. And demo links ofc. >>> >>> For example, CIEs POI backend: >>> GE is available from >>> https://github.com/Chiru/WeX/__tree/master/poi >>> >>> and live demo at >>> http://chiru.cie.fi/FI-WARE/__demos/POI/map_demo/ >>> >>> >>> etc. for almost all MIWI GEs. But right now I'm afraid that info >>> is not >>> gathered anywhere (that demo link for what the guys showed at >>> the F2F I >>> asked and got by private email) --- would be good to have in the >>> wiki in >>> any case I figure. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> ~Toni >>> >>> Begin forwarded message: >>> >>> *From: *Juanjo Hierro >>> >> >> >>> *Subject: **[Fiware] QUITE IMPORTANT AND URGENT: RE: GEs to >>> discuss in >>> the review meeting* >>> *Date: *13 Dec 2013 22:49:49 GMT+2 >>> *To: *"fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu >>> >>> >>> >> >" >>> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >>> Dear FI-WARE GEi owners, >>> >>> We have got a very clear response from our PO, Arian >>> Zweger, about >>> what are the concrete GEis which are going to be particularly >>> questioned during the month 30 project review next week. >>> >>> Please react accordingly so that: >>> >>> * you provide your WPL the necessary information that >>> will allow him >>> >>> to answer any potential question at the review; or >>> * let us know INMEDIATELY whether you will attend the >>> meeting >>> >>> personally, as to be able to respond any questions >>> directly >>> >>> Note that, regarding the first set of GEis, Arian >>> mentions that the >>> EC and reviewers wish to explore whether it is worthwhile to >>> continue >>> funding development. >>> >>> Some questions that I wouldn't be surprised if the >>> PO/reviewers make: >>> >>> * What are your commercial plans around the GEis beyond >>> the FI-PPP ? >>> * (for those cases were the GEi is not being offered >>> as open >>> >>> source): what are the FRAND terms under which you plan >>> to deliver >>> your GEi beyond the FI-PPP ? >>> * If you are not involved in any proposal focused on >>> continuation of >>> >>> the Technology Foundation (FI-WARE) ... how do you plan >>> to provide >>> lab support of your GEi to SMEs in phase 3 or even UC >>> projects in >>> phase 2 trials ? How doy you plan to provide level 1 >>> and 2 >>> support of you GEi if deployed on FI-Lab ? >>> >>> Besides this, there are a number of questions regarding >>> GEis in >>> several chapters that WPLs/WPAs should prepare a response >>> for. >>> >>> For those who didn't follow the details about the next >>> month 30 >>> project review, these are the logistics: >>> >>> Reharsal: Rehearsal: 16-17/Dec. Telef?nica's office >>> (Avenue des >>> Arts, 20).The meeting will start at 11:15-12:00 on >>> Monday. >>> Review: 18^th December 2013, avenue de Beaulieu BU25 >>> 0/S2 >>> >>> agenda of the >>> >>> review:https://docs.google.__com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=__0AmxBgS-__lWT4vdDB6NXJzMHVubDg1Zko5VG5Bb__zAzSnc#gid=0 >>> >>> >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> -- Juanjo Hierro >>> >>> P.D.: A note about the list below ... apartently, the DCA >>> GEi was in >>> the list because of an inconsistent message in the catalogue >>> (it was >>> mentioned that the product was going to be licensed as open >>> source >>> while at the same time it was stated that it could be >>> used under >>> certain terms and conditions). This has already been fixed. >>> >>> ------------- >>> Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital >>> website:www.tid.es >>> email:jhierro at tid.es >>> > >>> twitter:twitter.com/__JuanjoHierro >>> >>> >> > >>> >>> >>> FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator >>> and Chief Architect >>> >>> FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman >>> >>> You can follow FI-WARE at: >>> website:http://www.fi-ware.eu >>> >>> facebook:http://www.facebook.__com/pages/FI-WARE/__251366491587242 >>> >>> twitter:http://twitter.com/__FIware >>> >>> >>> linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.__com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 >>> >>> >>> >>> -------- Original Message -------- >>> Subject: RE: GEs to discuss in the review meeting >>> Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 14:33:44 +0000 >>> From: >> >>> > >>> To: > >>> CC: >>> >,>> >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> Dear Miguel, >>> >>> As requested, please find a list below. >>> >>> The question for the first group is*whether it is >>> worthwhile to >>> continue funding development of:* >>> >>> - Data Chapter >>> - Compressed Domain Video Analysis, Codoan >>> / Siemens >>> - Metadata Preprocessing, MetadataProcessor >>> / Siemens >>> - Media-enhanced Query Broker, QueryBroker >>> / Siemens >>> - Apps Chapter >>> - (Service Composition, Ericsson >>> Composition Editor >>> (ECE) / Ericsson) >>> - Service Mashup, Mashup Factory / DT >>> - Mediator, Mediator_TI / Telecom Italia >>> - IoT Chapter >>> - (Backend) Configuration Management, IoT >>> Discovery - UNIS >>> - (Backend) IoT Broker, IoT Broker - NEC >>> - (Backend) Device Management, IDAS DCA >>> - TID >>> - (Gateway) Protocol Adapter, ZPA / Telecom >>> Italia / >>> EPCGE / Orange >>> - Security Chapter >>> - Security Monitoring / Android >>> Vulnerability >>> Assessment, Ovaldroid / Inria >>> - Identity Management, GCP / DT >>> - Identity Management, One-IDM / NSN >>> - Identity Management, DigitalSelf / NSN >>> - Malware Detection Service (Opt), Morphus >>> / Inria >>> - I2ND Chapter >>> - Cloud Proxy >>> - (I2ND) Network Information and Control >>> (NetIC-VNP), >>> Altoclient/ALU-D >>> - (I2ND) Network Information and Control >>> (NetIC-OFNIC), VNP/NSN >>> - (I2ND) Network Information and Control >>> (NetIC-altoclient), VNEIC/ALU-I >>> - (I2ND) Service Connectivity Capability >>> and Control >>> (S3C), S3C / DT >>> - Tools >>> - Trace Analyzer, IBM Israel >>> >>> Then there are*specific questions*for the second group: >>> >>> - Cloud Chapter >>> - Why having a DCRM by IBM and one by >>> Intel? Differences? >>> - Object Storage GEi by IBM:?? Status? >>> - Edgelets Manager by Thales: not in the >>> Catalogue? >>> - Data Chapter >>> - UDA -- unstructured data analysis by >>> ATOS?? Status? >>> - Apps Chapter >>> - Relation Mediator_TI by Telecom Italia >>> and SETHA2 by >>> Thales? >>> - IoT Chapter >>> - (Gateway) Device Management, Gateway >>> Device >>> Management / Franhoufer: not in the Catalogue? >>> - Test and evaluation server environment >>> for NGSI by >>> SAP?? Status? >>> - Template Handler by SAP?? Status? >>> - Security Chapter >>> - KeyRock by UPM?? Status? >>> - Access Proxy by UPM?? Status? >>> - MiWi Chapter >>> - Where are Advanced Middleware, 2D-UI, >>> 3D-UI, >>> Synchronization, Cloud Rendering, Display as a Service, >>> GIS Data >>> Provider, POI Data Provider, 2D-3D-Capture, Augmented >>> Reality, >>> Real-Virtual Interaction, Virtual Character, Interface >>> Designer? Status? >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Arian >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------__------------------------------__------------ >>> >>> >>> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. >>> Puede >>> consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo >>> electr?nico >>> en el enlace situado m?s abajo. >>> This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We >>> only send >>> and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: >>> http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/__disclaimer.aspx >>> >>> _________________________________________________ >>> Fiware mailing list >>> Fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu >>> >>> >> > >>> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/__listinfo/fiware >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _________________________________________________ >>> Fiware-miwi mailing list >>> Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu >>> >>> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/__listinfo/fiware-miwi >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> ------------------------------__------------------------------__------------- >>> Deutsches Forschungszentrum f?r K?nstliche Intelligenz (DFKI) GmbH >>> Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern >>> >>> Gesch?ftsf?hrung: >>> Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender) >>> Dr. Walter Olthoff >>> Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: >>> Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes >>> >>> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Kaiserslautern (HRB 2313) >>> USt-Id.Nr.: DE 148646973, Steuernummer: 19/673/0060/3 >>> ------------------------------__------------------------------__--------------- >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Fiware-miwi mailing list >>> Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu >>> >>> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila >>> VP, Technology >>> Cyberlightning Ltd. >>> >>> mobile. +358 405245142 >>> email. jarkko at cyberlightning.com >>> >>> >>> Go to www.cybersli.de >>> and enrich your >>> presentations! >>> >>> www.cyberlightning.com >>> >> >> >> -- >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Deutsches Forschungszentrum f?r K?nstliche Intelligenz (DFKI) GmbH >> Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern >> >> Gesch?ftsf?hrung: >> Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender) >> Dr. Walter Olthoff >> Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: >> Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes >> >> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Kaiserslautern (HRB 2313) >> USt-Id.Nr.: DE 148646973, Steuernummer: 19/673/0060/3 >> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> _______________________________________________ >> Fiware-miwi mailing list >> Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu >> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-miwi mailing list > Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE_M30_Review_WP13_UOULU-CIE.pptx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentation Size: 168391 bytes Desc: not available URL: From tommi at adminotech.com Tue Dec 17 10:16:01 2013 From: tommi at adminotech.com (=?utf-8?Q?Tommi_Hollstr=C3=B6m?=) Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 11:16:01 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-miwi] miwi GE infos (Fwd: [Fiware] QUITE IMPORTANT AND URGENT: RE: GEs to discuss in the review meeting) In-Reply-To: <52B00BB8.7060003@cie.fi> References: <52AB72ED.9040600@tid.es> <9AED604A-EDCC-4CBF-A3F4-88DA91DC703C@playsign.net> <52AD4F82.7010303@dfki.de> <22228ee4df844a4bb7a53cd8e9b05805@SRV-MAIL-001.zhaw.ch> <70EAB876-63E6-461A-92EA-1063FCDB9859@zhaw.ch> <52B00BB8.7060003@cie.fi> Message-ID: Hi, ADMINO/ Adminotech slide. --? Tommi Hollstr?m, Adminotech Oy M?kelininkatu 15 90100 Oulu, Finland +358 40 747 8886 http://twitter.com/meshmoon1/ Register your own free?meshmoon?server. On 17. joulukuuta 2013 at 10.31.41, Arto Heikkinen (arto.heikkinen at cie.fi) wrote: Hi, UOULU/CIE's slide attached to this message. -Arto On 16.12.2013 19:05, Christof Marti wrote: Dear WP13 GE owners and partners Sorry for coming back to you so late. It was not exactly clear how the questions will be addressed at the review meeting on Wednesday. I joined now the rehearsal meeting in Brussels (after an traveling for 7h because of delayed and missed flights), where we prepare the content for the review.? After todays discussion, the structure is more clear now. I will present the status of WP13 and all its GEs in a very short slot (max 5 min.) Therefore I would like to have 1 slide with a short overview per GE, in table-form with the following fields: (these should only relate to the FI-WARE GEis features / not commercial additions) GE-Name: generic name of the GE GEI-Name: name of the specific implementation Partner(s) involved: Terms&Conditions: (Exact type of license for the GEi: commercial xxx, ?, Apache 2, MIT, GPLv2,.?) Status (Open API): now (not avail yet, early draft, draft, preliminary, final), reason why and why available. Current status: What is available at this moment What?s available in M33 (R3.2): 2-3 major features (or full functionality) What?s available in M36 (R3.3): additional features (or full functionality) Planned to be available in FI-LAB? yes/no (how: blue-print, vm image, global instance, demo app) Demo-Links To add this I prepared a Google Spreadsheet. Please complete it for your GE. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Auieh_fs3EUxdEhYRnVwN3lzcHF1dFU3elh0R2ZTd1E#gid=0 (I will then see, if I can compact and reduce the amount of data, columns, ? for the slide) I will add a summary slide of the WP13 status at all: Common points, OpenSpecification, Manuals, deliverables, ? (I also have a Word version of the OpenSpecification with me) Then I would like to prepare 1 slide per partner where he can elaborate on Examination plans Dissemination activities (executed, planned) Other comments (planned usage of UC-projects, reasons why something might get delayed, ?) Not sure if it will be used, but in case there are questions I can select the slide and show it. Please use the attached template for your slide. I saw some of you sent already some content. It?s fastest if you add it to? Deadline for all of the above is: Tomorrow Tuesday noon (12:00) (the earlier the better, because I also have to put it together to a nice presentation) Thanks for your support. Best regards Christof ---- InIT Cloud Computing Lab - ICCLab http://cloudcomp.ch Institut of Applied Information Technology - InIT Zurich University of Applied Sciences - ZHAW School of Engineering? Phone: +41 58 934 70 63 Skype: christof-marti Am 15.12.2013 um 14:48 schrieb Philipp Slusallek : Hi all, Am 15.12.2013 12:01, schrieb Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila: Please correct me now if I am wrong, but all the requested information is already available! Yes and No. Here is my view again in some more detail: -- The Open Specification are in the private Wiki, but not in the public? one, which means that the commission could in principle see them, but? likely will not find them (unless we tell them, which we should do :-).? Putting your report on a (public Wiki) may be a good starting point for? this. -- Outside of FI-WARE or the commission (e.g. use-case projects, general? public) the Open Spec will not be seen at all. We need to move it to the? Public Wiki. At the AB meeting on Fri I specifically asked Juanjo to? speed up this process, as our stuff has been ready for many weeks now? and people keep asking for it. -- At the end the commission and the public will be mainly looking at? the FI-WARE catalog. Our stuff only gets in there if it fulfills certain? quality criteria. The most important ones are the quality of all the? other documentation we are preparing right now, including software and? examples to test things out, T&C, etc. -- For the FI-LAB catalog we also need the Blueprints for automatic? installation. This is mandatory for server-based components but I? suggest that we also provide them for client-based software by? requesting a Web-server blueprint (probably available already) and? deploying the SW and examples to it. Christof, feel free to correct me or add things I missed. Thanks, Philipp You all know what is in the Open Specification. Up to this date, they are as ready as they can be. We are having tracker, and feature sets, and we have scheduled the development. From the schedule it can be seen that everything what we plan is going to be ready in January, with minor issues being patched after it. There are also installation and user guides. At least on behalf of Cyber and CIE, those are up to date and collectively already describe everything required. To emphasize: those guides already make a number of references to github source code repositories (which is allowed) and we already have a number of demos online and they are collectively described in one place. This place is now in the "interim payment" document, which contains demo links from Cyber and Playsign. Other parties did not deliver anything for it. So, given this, in my opinion the only thing we might be lacking is the collective list of demo links in Wiki. Obviously the interim report is not enough (since it is not public), and hence it should be published somewhere in the Wiki. Other thing we are missing still is the FI-LAB components. Those will come together with January release, in one form or another. Am I missing something? :) Maybe the other thing we need to be collectively doing, is a summarizing report of the progress, of which naturally contains a summary of the current Wiki status. - jarkko On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 8:43 AM, Philipp Slusallek > wrote: ? ?Hi Toni, all, ? ?I and Juanjo were at the Architecture Board meeting in Madrid ? ?Thu/Fri when that message arrived and did briefly talk about it. ? ?Here is my perspective based on the discussion with Juanjo: It is ? ?not a major issue. The point is listed last and we assume that Arian ? ?is just wondering when the GEs will become available as there is ? ?little information on this available yet (as discussed before). ? ?However, there are a few things that we should do: ? ?-- Put together a list of our GEs that will be ready for the January ? ?release. Please all respond as quickly as possible by email, maybe ? ?we can set up a document somewhere where we can collect the information. ? ?-- For GEs that will not be ready for January we should have a good ? ?explanation. ? ?-- This list should be sent to Juanjo on Monday (before their review ? ?on Tuesday) !! ? ?-- As agreed with Christof we need to push for information being ? ?made publicly available on FI-WARE Wiki and need to put them in the ? ?FI-WARE Catalog as well. ? ?-- GEs should also be available on FI-LAB. There they will only be ? ?accepted on FI-LAB when their quality is high enough. We need to ? ?make sure it is. This also requires setting up blueprints (at least ? ?for SEs that need to be installed on a server, which can also mean ? ?Web server + JS libraries). ? ?Best, ? ? ? ? ? ? Philipp ? ?Am 14.12.2013 14:54, schrieb Toni Alatalo: ? ? ? ?Was just wondering about this ? is this simply due to WP13 GEs not ? ? ? ?having been part of any official fi-ware release yet? ? ? ? ?Or is something missing about the status of our GEs? Many of ? ? ? ?them are ? ? ? ?already available in work-in-progress pre-release mode, on ? ? ? ?github. Just ? ? ? ?wanted to mention Christof that if you need help in gathering ? ? ? ?MIWI GE ? ? ? ?status, links to the source codes and info about commercial ? ? ? ?exploitation ? ? ? ?etc. we can quite easily do that. And demo links ofc. ? ? ? ?For example, CIEs POI backend: ? ? ? ?GE is available from ? ? ? ?https://github.com/Chiru/WeX/__tree/master/poi ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?and live demo at ? ? ? ?http://chiru.cie.fi/FI-WARE/__demos/POI/map_demo/ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?etc. for almost all MIWI GEs. But right now I?m afraid that info ? ? ? ?is not ? ? ? ?gathered anywhere (that demo link for what the guys showed at ? ? ? ?the F2F I ? ? ? ?asked and got by private email) ? would be good to have in the ? ? ? ?wiki in ? ? ? ?any case I figure. ? ? ? ?Cheers, ? ? ? ?~Toni ? ? ? ?Begin forwarded message: ? ? ? ? ? ?*From: *Juanjo Hierro >> ? ? ? ? ? ?*Subject: **[Fiware] QUITE IMPORTANT AND URGENT: RE: GEs to ? ? ? ? ? ?discuss in ? ? ? ? ? ?the review meeting* ? ? ? ? ? ?*Date: *13 Dec 2013 22:49:49 GMT+2 ? ? ? ? ? ?*To: *"fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?>" ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?>> ? ? ? ? ? ?Dear FI-WARE GEi owners, ? ? ? ? ? ? ? We have got a very clear response from our PO, Arian ? ? ? ? ? ?Zweger, about ? ? ? ? ? ?what are the concrete GEis which are going to be particularly ? ? ? ? ? ?questioned during the month 30 project review next week. ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Please react accordingly so that: ? ? ? ? ? ? ? * you provide your WPL the necessary information that ? ? ? ? ? ?will allow him ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? to answer any potential question at the review; or ? ? ? ? ? ? ? * let us know INMEDIATELY whether you will attend the meeting ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? personally, as to be able to respond any questions directly ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Note that, regarding the first set of GEis, Arian ? ? ? ? ? ?mentions that the ? ? ? ? ? ?EC and reviewers wish to explore whether it is worthwhile to ? ? ? ? ? ?continue ? ? ? ? ? ?funding development. ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Some questions that I wouldn't be surprised if the ? ? ? ? ? ?PO/reviewers make: ? ? ? ? ? ? ? * What are your commercial plans around the GEis beyond ? ? ? ? ? ?the FI-PPP ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? * (for those cases were the GEi is not being offered as open ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? source): what are the FRAND terms under which you plan ? ? ? ? ? ?to deliver ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? your GEi beyond the FI-PPP ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? * If you are not involved in any proposal focused on ? ? ? ? ? ?continuation of ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? the Technology Foundation (FI-WARE) ... how do you plan ? ? ? ? ? ?to provide ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? lab support of your GEi to SMEs in phase 3 or even UC ? ? ? ? ? ?projects in ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? phase 2 trials ? ? ?How doy you plan to provide level 1 ? ? ? ? ? ?and 2 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? support of you GEi if deployed on FI-Lab ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Besides this, there are a number of questions regarding ? ? ? ? ? ?GEis in ? ? ? ? ? ?several chapters that WPLs/WPAs should prepare a response for. ? ? ? ? ? ? ? For those who didn't follow the details about the next ? ? ? ? ? ?month 30 ? ? ? ? ? ?project review, these are the logistics: ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Reharsal: Rehearsal: 16-17/Dec. Telef?nica?s office ? ? ? ? ? ?(Avenue des ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Arts, 20).The meeting will start at 11:15-12:00 on Monday. ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Review: 18^th December 2013, avenue de Beaulieu BU25 0/S2 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? agenda of the ? ? ? ? ? ?review:https://docs.google.__com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=__0AmxBgS-__lWT4vdDB6NXJzMHVubDg1Zko5VG5Bb__zAzSnc#gid=0 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Best regards, ? ? ? ? ? ?-- Juanjo Hierro ? ? ? ? ? ?P.D.: A note about the list below ... apartently, the DCA ? ? ? ? ? ?GEi was in ? ? ? ? ? ?the list because of an inconsistent message in the catalogue ? ? ? ? ? ?(it was ? ? ? ? ? ?mentioned that the product was going to be licensed as open ? ? ? ? ? ?source ? ? ? ? ? ?while at the same time it was stated that it could be used under ? ? ? ? ? ?certain terms and conditions). ? This has already been fixed. ? ? ? ? ? ?------------- ? ? ? ? ? ?Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital ? ? ? ? ? ?website:www.tid.es ? ? ? ? ? ?email:jhierro at tid.es ? ? ? ? ? ?twitter:twitter.com/__JuanjoHierro ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?> ? ? ? ? ? ?FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator ? ? ? ? ? ?and Chief Architect ? ? ? ? ? ?FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman ? ? ? ? ? ?You can follow FI-WARE at: ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?website:http://www.fi-ware.eu ? ? ? ? ? ? ?facebook:http://www.facebook.__com/pages/FI-WARE/__251366491587242 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?twitter:http://twitter.com/__FIware ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.__com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?-------- Original Message -------- ? ? ? ? ? ?Subject: ? ? ? ?RE: GEs to discuss in the review meeting ? ? ? ? ? ?Date: ? Fri, 13 Dec 2013 14:33:44 +0000 ? ? ? ? ? ?From: ? > ? ? ? ? ? ?To: ? ? > ? ? ? ? ? ?CC: ? ? >,> ? ? ? ? ? ?Dear Miguel, ? ? ? ? ? ?As requested, please find a list below. ? ? ? ? ? ?The question for the first group is*whether it is worthwhile to ? ? ? ? ? ?continue funding development of:* ? ? ? ? ? ?- Data Chapter ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? - Compressed Domain Video Analysis, Codoan ? ? ? ? ? ?/ Siemens ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? - Metadata Preprocessing, MetadataProcessor ? ? ? ? ? ?/ Siemens ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? - Media-enhanced Query Broker, QueryBroker ? ? ? ? ? ?/ Siemens ? ? ? ? ? ?- Apps Chapter ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? - (Service Composition, Ericsson ? ? ? ? ? ?Composition Editor ? ? ? ? ? ?(ECE) / Ericsson) ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? - Service Mashup, Mashup Factory / DT ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? - Mediator, Mediator_TI / Telecom Italia ? ? ? ? ? ?- IoT Chapter ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? - (Backend) Configuration Management, IoT ? ? ? ? ? ?Discovery - UNIS ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? - (Backend) IoT Broker, IoT Broker - NEC ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? - (Backend) Device Management, IDAS DCA - TID ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? - (Gateway) Protocol Adapter, ZPA / Telecom ? ? ? ? ? ?Italia / ? ? ? ? ? ?EPCGE / Orange ? ? ? ? ? ?- Security Chapter ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? - Security Monitoring / Android Vulnerability ? ? ? ? ? ?Assessment, Ovaldroid / Inria ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? - Identity Management, GCP / DT ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? - Identity Management, One-IDM / NSN ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? - Identity Management, DigitalSelf / NSN ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? - Malware Detection Service (Opt), Morphus ? ? ? ? ? ?/ Inria ? ? ? ? ? ?- I2ND Chapter ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? - Cloud Proxy ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? - (I2ND) Network Information and Control ? ? ? ? ? ?(NetIC-VNP), ? ? ? ? ? ?Altoclient/ALU-D ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? - (I2ND) Network Information and Control ? ? ? ? ? ?(NetIC-OFNIC), VNP/NSN ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? - (I2ND) Network Information and Control ? ? ? ? ? ?(NetIC-altoclient), VNEIC/ALU-I ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? - (I2ND) Service Connectivity Capability ? ? ? ? ? ?and Control ? ? ? ? ? ?(S3C), S3C / DT ? ? ? ? ? ?- Tools ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? - Trace Analyzer, IBM Israel ? ? ? ? ? ?Then there are*specific questions*for the second group: ? ? ? ? ? ?- Cloud Chapter ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? - Why having a DCRM by IBM and one by ? ? ? ? ? ?Intel? Differences? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? - Object Storage GEi by IBM:?? Status? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? - Edgelets Manager by Thales: not in the ? ? ? ? ? ?Catalogue? ? ? ? ? ? ?- Data Chapter ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? - UDA ? unstructured data analysis by ? ? ? ? ? ?ATOS?? Status? ? ? ? ? ? ?- Apps Chapter ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? - Relation Mediator_TI by Telecom Italia ? ? ? ? ? ?and SETHA2 by ? ? ? ? ? ?Thales? ? ? ? ? ? ?- IoT Chapter ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? - (Gateway) Device Management, Gateway Device ? ? ? ? ? ?Management / Franhoufer: not in the Catalogue? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? - Test and evaluation server environment ? ? ? ? ? ?for NGSI by ? ? ? ? ? ?SAP?? Status? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? - Template Handler by SAP?? Status? ? ? ? ? ? ?- Security Chapter ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? - KeyRock by UPM?? Status? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? - Access Proxy by UPM?? Status? ? ? ? ? ? ?- MiWi Chapter ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? - Where are Advanced Middleware, 2D-UI, 3D-UI, ? ? ? ? ? ?Synchronization, Cloud Rendering, Display as a Service, GIS Data ? ? ? ? ? ?Provider, POI Data Provider, 2D-3D-Capture, Augmented Reality, ? ? ? ? ? ?Real-Virtual Interaction, Virtual Character, Interface ? ? ? ? ? ?Designer? Status? ? ? ? ? ? ?Best regards, ? ? ? ? ? ?Arian ? ? ? ? ? ?------------------------------__------------------------------__------------ ? ? ? ? ? ?Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede ? ? ? ? ? ?consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo ? ? ? ? ? ?electr?nico ? ? ? ? ? ?en el enlace situado m?s abajo. ? ? ? ? ? ?This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We ? ? ? ? ? ?only send ? ? ? ? ? ?and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: ? ? ? ? ? ?http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/__disclaimer.aspx ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?_________________________________________________ ? ? ? ? ? ?Fiware mailing list ? ? ? ? ? ?Fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu ? ? ? ? ? ?> ? ? ? ? ? ?https://lists.fi-ware.eu/__listinfo/fiware ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?_________________________________________________ ? ? ? ?Fiware-miwi mailing list ? ? ? ?Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu ? ? ? ?https://lists.fi-ware.eu/__listinfo/fiware-miwi ? ? ? ? ? ?-- ? ?------------------------------__------------------------------__------------- ? ?Deutsches Forschungszentrum f?r K?nstliche Intelligenz (DFKI) GmbH ? ?Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern ? ?Gesch?ftsf?hrung: ? ? ? Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender) ? ? ? Dr. Walter Olthoff ? ?Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: ? ? ? Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes ? ?Sitz der Gesellschaft: Kaiserslautern (HRB 2313) ? ?USt-Id.Nr.: DE 148646973, Steuernummer: ?19/673/0060/3 ? ?------------------------------__------------------------------__--------------- ? ?_______________________________________________ ? ?Fiware-miwi mailing list ? ?Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu ? ?https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi -- Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila VP, Technology Cyberlightning Ltd. mobile. +358 405245142 email. jarkko at cyberlightning.com Go to www.cybersli.de and enrich your presentations! www.cyberlightning.com --? ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Deutsches Forschungszentrum f?r K?nstliche Intelligenz (DFKI) GmbH Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern Gesch?ftsf?hrung: ? Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender) ? Dr. Walter Olthoff Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: ? Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes Sitz der Gesellschaft: Kaiserslautern (HRB 2313) USt-Id.Nr.: DE 148646973, Steuernummer: ?19/673/0060/3 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Fiware-miwi mailing list Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi _______________________________________________ Fiware-miwi mailing list Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi - FI-WARE_M30_Review_WP13_UOULU-CIE.pptx, 225.4 KB _______________________________________________ Fiware-miwi mailing list Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE_M30_Review_WP13_ADMINO.pptx Type: application/octet-stream Size: 169474 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mach at zhaw.ch Tue Dec 17 10:27:32 2013 From: mach at zhaw.ch (Christof Marti) Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 10:27:32 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-miwi] miwi GE infos In-Reply-To: <28a65332763441ad97f65f34bab43f70@SRV-MAIL-001.zhaw.ch> References: <52AB72ED.9040600@tid.es> <9AED604A-EDCC-4CBF-A3F4-88DA91DC703C@playsign.net> <52AD4F82.7010303@dfki.de> <22228ee4df844a4bb7a53cd8e9b05805@SRV-MAIL-001.zhaw.ch> <28a65332763441ad97f65f34bab43f70@SRV-MAIL-001.zhaw.ch> Message-ID: Hi everybody Thanks for all who provided their infos already to the Spreadsheet and sent the slides. I will try to put together the slide deck until about 13:00 today and send it to you for feedback. Some points to the spreadsheet: 1. If your GE implementation has a name please add it to column B. 2. Be honest about the status of the Open API description. Not all APIs do really have the status "Draft" yet. (e.g. DaaS is completely missing in the Wiki, some have almost no content, others are better but still brief) 3. Most important is, what is delivered in R3.2 (Fi-WARE R3, should not be empty) 4. For those GE, which are difficult to demonstrate because of specific HW/SW restrictions, it would be great to have a video showing the current status. Thanks Christof ---- InIT Cloud Computing Lab - ICCLab http://cloudcomp.ch Institut of Applied Information Technology - InIT Zurich University of Applied Sciences - ZHAW School of Engineering Phone: +41 58 934 70 63 Skype: christof-marti Am 16.12.2013 um 18:05 schrieb Marti Christof (mach) : > Dear WP13 GE owners and partners > > Sorry for coming back to you so late. > It was not exactly clear how the questions will be addressed at the review meeting on Wednesday. > I joined now the rehearsal meeting in Brussels (after an traveling for 7h because of delayed and missed flights), where we prepare the content for the review. > After todays discussion, the structure is more clear now. > > I will present the status of WP13 and all its GEs in a very short slot (max 5 min.) > Therefore I would like to have 1 slide with a short overview per GE, in table-form with the following fields: > (these should only relate to the FI-WARE GEis features / not commercial additions) > GE-Name: generic name of the GE > GEI-Name: name of the specific implementation > Partner(s) involved: > Terms&Conditions: (Exact type of license for the GEi: commercial xxx, ?, Apache 2, MIT, GPLv2,.?) > Status (Open API): now (not avail yet, early draft, draft, preliminary, final), reason why and why available. > Current status: What is available at this moment > What?s available in M33 (R3.2): 2-3 major features (or full functionality) > What?s available in M36 (R3.3): additional features (or full functionality) > Planned to be available in FI-LAB? yes/no (how: blue-print, vm image, global instance, demo app) > Demo-Links > To add this I prepared a Google Spreadsheet. Please complete it for your GE. > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Auieh_fs3EUxdEhYRnVwN3lzcHF1dFU3elh0R2ZTd1E#gid=0 > (I will then see, if I can compact and reduce the amount of data, columns, ? for the slide) > > I will add a summary slide of the WP13 status at all: > Common points, OpenSpecification, Manuals, deliverables, ? > (I also have a Word version of the OpenSpecification with me) > > Then I would like to prepare 1 slide per partner where he can elaborate on > Examination plans > Dissemination activities (executed, planned) > Other comments (planned usage of UC-projects, reasons why something might get delayed, ?) > Not sure if it will be used, but in case there are questions I can select the slide and show it. > Please use the attached template for your slide. > > I saw some of you sent already some content. It?s fastest if you add it to > > Deadline for all of the above is: Tomorrow Tuesday noon (12:00) > (the earlier the better, because I also have to put it together to a nice presentation) > > Thanks for your support. > > Best regards > Christof > ---- > InIT Cloud Computing Lab - ICCLab http://cloudcomp.ch > Institut of Applied Information Technology - InIT > Zurich University of Applied Sciences - ZHAW > School of Engineering > Phone: +41 58 934 70 63 > Skype: christof-marti > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From JaimeMartin at eprosima.com Tue Dec 17 12:52:50 2013 From: JaimeMartin at eprosima.com (Jaime Martin Losa) Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 11:52:50 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-miwi] miwi GE infos (Fwd: [Fiware] QUITE IMPORTANT AND URGENT: RE: GEs to discuss in the review meeting) In-Reply-To: <52AFEC21.2040207@dfki.de> References: <52AB72ED.9040600@tid.es> <9AED604A-EDCC-4CBF-A3F4-88DA91DC703C@playsign.net> <52AD4F82.7010303@dfki.de> <22228ee4df844a4bb7a53cd8e9b05805@SRV-MAIL-001.zhaw.ch> <70EAB876-63E6-461A-92EA-1063FCDB9859@zhaw.ch> <52AFEC21.2040207@dfki.de> Message-ID: <848127d356a74c80b95a826b770328dc@AMSPR06MB344.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com> Hi Philipp, We have been released a number of pieces as you know: eProsima RPC over DDS, eProsima Fast Buffers (CDR Based serialization), eProsima Dynamic Fast Buffers (CDR Based serialization - Dynamic) -> Dynamic API to define Data Types and generate dynamically eProsima RPC over REST (Rest WS compatilbity), RPC over DDS and Fast buffers are available for download now in our web page (www.eprosima.com ), and the other two pieces are distributed internally, and we are just reviewing the docs, we release everything to the general public this week. As a matter of fact, these pieces are already used as products by real customers, now. So, I cannot admit your comment regarding KIARA in the spreadsheet. I think this has been discuss already between us: each partner has been developing pieces and now we are in the integration phase, you cannot just define KIARA as your contribution. Remember the only pieces ready for production, and actually used in production, are our modules, and the only thing we delivered until now. And, in any case, this is an internal discussion we should not expose to the reviewers. Regards, Jaime. -----Original Message----- From: fiware-miwi-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-miwi-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Philipp Slusallek Sent: martes, 17 de diciembre de 2013 7:16 To: Christof Marti Cc: Fiware-miwi FI-WARE Subject: Re: [Fiware-miwi] miwi GE infos (Fwd: [Fiware] QUITE IMPORTANT AND URGENT: RE: GEs to discuss in the review meeting) Hi, I have updated the table for 3D-UI, DaaS, and KIARA and attached is the slide for DFKI (had to modify the layout slightly to fit things on the slide, so please copy with layout intact). The only issue that I could possibly see with our GEs are the OSS issues with respect to DaaS due to the patent agreement with the University. We will have several discussion with them early next year and I hope that this will be resolved then. Otherwise we are well on track to release our parts. This is also true with respect to the KIARA middleware, even though no contributions of the other partners have been made available or integrated yet. I am no longer willing to accept this without comments and so this information is in the table. Please leave it there! Best, Philipp Am 16.12.2013 18:05, schrieb Christof Marti: > Dear WP13 GE owners and partners > > Sorry for coming back to you so late. > It was not exactly clear how the questions will be addressed at the > review meeting on Wednesday. > I joined now the rehearsal meeting in Brussels (after an traveling for > 7h because of delayed and missed flights), where we prepare the > content for the review. > After todays discussion, the structure is more clear now. > > I will present the status of WP13 and all its GEs in a very short slot > (max 5 min.) Therefore I would like to have *1 slide* with a short > overview *per GE*, in table-form with the following fields: > (these should only relate to the FI-WARE GEis features / not > commercial > additions) > > * GE-Name: generic name of the GE > * GEI-Name: name of the specific implementation > * Partner(s) involved: > * Terms&Conditions: (Exact type of license for the GEi: commercial > xxx, ., Apache 2, MIT, GPLv2,..) > * Status (Open API): now (not avail yet, early draft, draft, > preliminary, final), reason why and why available. > * Current status: What is available at this moment > * What's available in M33 (R3.2): 2-3 major features (or full > functionality) > * What's available in M36 (R3.3): additional features (or full > functionality) > * Planned to be available in FI-LAB? yes/no (how: blue-print, vm > image, global instance, demo app) > * Demo-Links > > To add this I prepared a Google Spreadsheet. Please complete it for your GE. > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Auieh_fs3EUxdEhYRnVwN3lzc > HF1dFU3elh0R2ZTd1E#gid=0 (I will then see, if I can compact and reduce > the amount of data, columns, . for the slide) > > I will add *a summary slide* of the WP13 status at all: > Common points, OpenSpecification, Manuals, deliverables, . (I also > have a Word version of the OpenSpecification with me) > > Then I would like to prepare *1 slide per partner* where he can > elaborate on > > * Examination plans > * Dissemination activities (executed, planned) > * Other comments (planned usage of UC-projects, reasons why something > might get delayed, .) > > Not sure if it will be used, but in case there are questions I can > select the slide and show it. > Please use the attached template for your slide. > > I saw some of you sent already some content. It's fastest if you add > it to > > *Deadline for all of the above is: Tomorrow Tuesday noon (12:00)* (the > earlier the better, because I also have to put it together to a nice > presentation) > > Thanks for your support. > > Best regards > Christof > ---- > InIT Cloud Computing Lab - ICCLab http://cloudcomp.ch Institut of > Applied Information Technology - InIT Zurich University of Applied > Sciences - ZHAW School of Engineering > Phone: +41 58 934 70 63 > Skype: christof-marti > > Am 15.12.2013 um 14:48 schrieb Philipp Slusallek > >: > >> Hi all, >> >> Am 15.12.2013 12:01, schrieb Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila: >>> Please correct me now if I am wrong, but all the requested >>> information is already available! >> >> Yes and No. Here is my view again in some more detail: >> >> -- The Open Specification are in the private Wiki, but not in the >> public one, which means that the commission could in principle see >> them, but likely will not find them (unless we tell them, which we should do :-). >> Putting your report on a (public Wiki) may be a good starting point >> for this. >> >> -- Outside of FI-WARE or the commission (e.g. use-case projects, >> general >> public) the Open Spec will not be seen at all. We need to move it to >> the Public Wiki. At the AB meeting on Fri I specifically asked Juanjo >> to speed up this process, as our stuff has been ready for many weeks >> now and people keep asking for it. >> >> -- At the end the commission and the public will be mainly looking at >> the FI-WARE catalog. Our stuff only gets in there if it fulfills >> certain quality criteria. The most important ones are the quality of >> all the other documentation we are preparing right now, including >> software and examples to test things out, T&C, etc. >> >> -- For the FI-LAB catalog we also need the Blueprints for automatic >> installation. This is mandatory for server-based components but I >> suggest that we also provide them for client-based software by >> requesting a Web-server blueprint (probably available already) and >> deploying the SW and examples to it. >> >> Christof, feel free to correct me or add things I missed. >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Philipp >> >>> You all know what is in the Open Specification. Up to this date, >>> they are as ready as they can be. We are having tracker, and feature >>> sets, and we have scheduled the development. From the schedule it >>> can be seen that everything what we plan is going to be ready in >>> January, with minor issues being patched after it. There are also >>> installation and user guides. At least on behalf of Cyber and CIE, >>> those are up to date and collectively already describe everything >>> required. To emphasize: those guides already make a number of >>> references to github source code repositories (which is allowed) and >>> we already have a number of demos online and they are collectively >>> described in one place. This place is now in the "interim payment" >>> document, which contains demo links from Cyber and Playsign. Other parties did not deliver anything for it. >>> >>> So, given this, in my opinion the only thing we might be lacking is >>> the collective list of demo links in Wiki. Obviously the interim >>> report is not enough (since it is not public), and hence it should >>> be published somewhere in the Wiki. >>> >>> Other thing we are missing still is the FI-LAB components. Those >>> will come together with January release, in one form or another. >>> >>> Am I missing something? :) Maybe the other thing we need to be >>> collectively doing, is a summarizing report of the progress, of >>> which naturally contains a summary of the current Wiki status. >>> >>> - jarkko >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 8:43 AM, Philipp Slusallek >>> >>> > wrote: >>> >>> Hi Toni, all, >>> >>> I and Juanjo were at the Architecture Board meeting in Madrid >>> Thu/Fri when that message arrived and did briefly talk about it. >>> >>> Here is my perspective based on the discussion with Juanjo: It is >>> not a major issue. The point is listed last and we assume that Arian >>> is just wondering when the GEs will become available as there is >>> little information on this available yet (as discussed before). >>> >>> >>> However, there are a few things that we should do: >>> >>> -- Put together a list of our GEs that will be ready for the January >>> release. Please all respond as quickly as possible by email, maybe >>> we can set up a document somewhere where we can collect the >>> information. >>> >>> -- For GEs that will not be ready for January we should have a good >>> explanation. >>> >>> -- This list should be sent to Juanjo on Monday (before their review >>> on Tuesday) !! >>> >>> -- As agreed with Christof we need to push for information being >>> made publicly available on FI-WARE Wiki and need to put them in the >>> FI-WARE Catalog as well. >>> >>> -- GEs should also be available on FI-LAB. There they will only be >>> accepted on FI-LAB when their quality is high enough. We need to >>> make sure it is. This also requires setting up blueprints (at least >>> for SEs that need to be installed on a server, which can also mean >>> Web server + JS libraries). >>> >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Philipp >>> >>> Am 14.12.2013 14:54, schrieb Toni Alatalo: >>> >>> Was just wondering about this - is this simply due to WP13 GEs not >>> having been part of any official fi-ware release yet? >>> >>> Or is something missing about the status of our GEs? Many of >>> them are >>> already available in work-in-progress pre-release mode, on >>> github. Just >>> wanted to mention Christof that if you need help in gathering >>> MIWI GE >>> status, links to the source codes and info about commercial >>> exploitation >>> etc. we can quite easily do that. And demo links ofc. >>> >>> For example, CIEs POI backend: >>> GE is available from >>> https://github.com/Chiru/WeX/__tree/master/poi >>> >>> and live demo at >>> http://chiru.cie.fi/FI-WARE/__demos/POI/map_demo/ >>> >>> >>> etc. for almost all MIWI GEs. But right now I'm afraid that info >>> is not >>> gathered anywhere (that demo link for what the guys showed at >>> the F2F I >>> asked and got by private email) - would be good to have in the >>> wiki in >>> any case I figure. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> ~Toni >>> >>> Begin forwarded message: >>> >>> *From: *Juanjo Hierro >>> >> >> >>> *Subject: **[Fiware] QUITE IMPORTANT AND URGENT: RE: GEs to >>> discuss in >>> the review meeting* >>> *Date: *13 Dec 2013 22:49:49 GMT+2 >>> *To: *"fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu >>> >>> >>> >> >" >>> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >>> Dear FI-WARE GEi owners, >>> >>> We have got a very clear response from our PO, Arian >>> Zweger, about >>> what are the concrete GEis which are going to be particularly >>> questioned during the month 30 project review next week. >>> >>> Please react accordingly so that: >>> >>> * you provide your WPL the necessary information that >>> will allow him >>> >>> to answer any potential question at the review; or >>> * let us know INMEDIATELY whether you will attend the >>> meeting >>> >>> personally, as to be able to respond any questions >>> directly >>> >>> Note that, regarding the first set of GEis, Arian >>> mentions that the >>> EC and reviewers wish to explore whether it is worthwhile to >>> continue >>> funding development. >>> >>> Some questions that I wouldn't be surprised if the >>> PO/reviewers make: >>> >>> * What are your commercial plans around the GEis beyond >>> the FI-PPP ? >>> * (for those cases were the GEi is not being offered >>> as open >>> >>> source): what are the FRAND terms under which you plan >>> to deliver >>> your GEi beyond the FI-PPP ? >>> * If you are not involved in any proposal focused on >>> continuation of >>> >>> the Technology Foundation (FI-WARE) ... how do you plan >>> to provide >>> lab support of your GEi to SMEs in phase 3 or even UC >>> projects in >>> phase 2 trials ? How doy you plan to provide level 1 >>> and 2 >>> support of you GEi if deployed on FI-Lab ? >>> >>> Besides this, there are a number of questions regarding >>> GEis in >>> several chapters that WPLs/WPAs should prepare a response for. >>> >>> For those who didn't follow the details about the next >>> month 30 >>> project review, these are the logistics: >>> >>> Reharsal: Rehearsal: 16-17/Dec. Telef?nica's office >>> (Avenue des >>> Arts, 20).The meeting will start at 11:15-12:00 on >>> Monday. >>> Review: 18^th December 2013, avenue de Beaulieu BU25 >>> 0/S2 >>> >>> agenda of the >>> >>> >>> >>> review:https://docs.google.__com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=__0AmxBgS-__lWT >>> 4vdDB6NXJzMHVubDg1Zko5VG5Bb__zAzSnc#gid=0 >>> >>> >>> >> VubDg1Zko5VG5BbzAzSnc#gid=0> >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> -- Juanjo Hierro >>> >>> P.D.: A note about the list below ... apartently, the DCA >>> GEi was in >>> the list because of an inconsistent message in the catalogue >>> (it was >>> mentioned that the product was going to be licensed as open >>> source >>> while at the same time it was stated that it could be >>> used under >>> certain terms and conditions). This has already been fixed. >>> >>> ------------- >>> Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital >>> website:www.tid.es >>> email:jhierro at tid.es >>> > >>> twitter:twitter.com/__JuanjoHierro >>> >>> >> > >>> >>> >>> FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator >>> and Chief Architect >>> >>> FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman >>> >>> You can follow FI-WARE at: >>> website:http://www.fi-ware.eu >>> >>> >>> facebook:http://www.facebook.__com/pages/FI-WARE/__251366491587242 >>> >>> twitter:http://twitter.com/__FIware >>> >>> >>> linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.__com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 >>> >>> >>> >>> -------- Original Message -------- >>> Subject: RE: GEs to discuss in the review meeting >>> Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 14:33:44 +0000 >>> From: >> >>> > >>> To: > >>> CC: >>> >,>> >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> Dear Miguel, >>> >>> As requested, please find a list below. >>> >>> The question for the first group is*whether it is >>> worthwhile to >>> continue funding development of:* >>> >>> - Data Chapter >>> - Compressed Domain Video Analysis, Codoan >>> / Siemens >>> - Metadata Preprocessing, MetadataProcessor >>> / Siemens >>> - Media-enhanced Query Broker, QueryBroker >>> / Siemens >>> - Apps Chapter >>> - (Service Composition, Ericsson >>> Composition Editor >>> (ECE) / Ericsson) >>> - Service Mashup, Mashup Factory / DT >>> - Mediator, Mediator_TI / Telecom Italia >>> - IoT Chapter >>> - (Backend) Configuration Management, IoT >>> Discovery - UNIS >>> - (Backend) IoT Broker, IoT Broker - NEC >>> - (Backend) Device Management, IDAS DCA - TID >>> - (Gateway) Protocol Adapter, ZPA / Telecom >>> Italia / >>> EPCGE / Orange >>> - Security Chapter >>> - Security Monitoring / Android Vulnerability >>> Assessment, Ovaldroid / Inria >>> - Identity Management, GCP / DT >>> - Identity Management, One-IDM / NSN >>> - Identity Management, DigitalSelf / NSN >>> - Malware Detection Service (Opt), Morphus >>> / Inria >>> - I2ND Chapter >>> - Cloud Proxy >>> - (I2ND) Network Information and Control >>> (NetIC-VNP), >>> Altoclient/ALU-D >>> - (I2ND) Network Information and Control >>> (NetIC-OFNIC), VNP/NSN >>> - (I2ND) Network Information and Control >>> (NetIC-altoclient), VNEIC/ALU-I >>> - (I2ND) Service Connectivity Capability >>> and Control >>> (S3C), S3C / DT >>> - Tools >>> - Trace Analyzer, IBM Israel >>> >>> Then there are*specific questions*for the second group: >>> >>> - Cloud Chapter >>> - Why having a DCRM by IBM and one by >>> Intel? Differences? >>> - Object Storage GEi by IBM:?? Status? >>> - Edgelets Manager by Thales: not in the >>> Catalogue? >>> - Data Chapter >>> - UDA - unstructured data analysis by >>> ATOS?? Status? >>> - Apps Chapter >>> - Relation Mediator_TI by Telecom Italia >>> and SETHA2 by >>> Thales? >>> - IoT Chapter >>> - (Gateway) Device Management, Gateway Device >>> Management / Franhoufer: not in the Catalogue? >>> - Test and evaluation server environment >>> for NGSI by >>> SAP?? Status? >>> - Template Handler by SAP?? Status? >>> - Security Chapter >>> - KeyRock by UPM?? Status? >>> - Access Proxy by UPM?? Status? >>> - MiWi Chapter >>> - Where are Advanced Middleware, 2D-UI, >>> 3D-UI, >>> Synchronization, Cloud Rendering, Display as a Service, >>> GIS Data >>> Provider, POI Data Provider, 2D-3D-Capture, Augmented Reality, >>> Real-Virtual Interaction, Virtual Character, Interface >>> Designer? Status? >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Arian >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------__------------------------------__---- >>> -------- >>> >>> >>> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede >>> consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo >>> electr?nico >>> en el enlace situado m?s abajo. >>> This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We >>> only send >>> and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: >>> http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/__disclaimer.aspx >>> >>> _________________________________________________ >>> Fiware mailing list >>> Fiware at lists.fi-ware.eu >>> >>> >> > >>> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/__listinfo/fiware >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _________________________________________________ >>> Fiware-miwi mailing list >>> Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu >>> >>> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/__listinfo/fiware-miwi >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------__------------------------------__------------- >>> Deutsches Forschungszentrum f?r K?nstliche Intelligenz (DFKI) GmbH >>> Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern >>> >>> Gesch?ftsf?hrung: >>> Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender) >>> Dr. Walter Olthoff >>> Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: >>> Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes >>> >>> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Kaiserslautern (HRB 2313) >>> USt-Id.Nr.: DE 148646973, Steuernummer: 19/673/0060/3 >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------__------------------------------__---- >>> ----------- >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Fiware-miwi mailing list >>> Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu >>> >>> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila >>> VP, Technology >>> Cyberlightning Ltd. >>> >>> mobile. +358 405245142 >>> email. jarkko at cyberlightning.com >>> >>> >>> Go to www.cybersli.de >>> and enrich your presentations! >>> >>> www.cyberlightning.com >>> >> >> >> -- >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> ---- Deutsches Forschungszentrum f?r K?nstliche Intelligenz (DFKI) >> GmbH Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern >> >> Gesch?ftsf?hrung: >> Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender) >> Dr. Walter Olthoff >> Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: >> Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes >> >> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Kaiserslautern (HRB 2313) >> USt-Id.Nr.: DE 148646973, Steuernummer: 19/673/0060/3 >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> ------ _______________________________________________ >> Fiware-miwi mailing list >> Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu >> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-miwi mailing list > Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi > -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Deutsches Forschungszentrum f?r K?nstliche Intelligenz (DFKI) GmbH Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern Gesch?ftsf?hrung: Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender) Dr. Walter Olthoff Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes Sitz der Gesellschaft: Kaiserslautern (HRB 2313) USt-Id.Nr.: DE 148646973, Steuernummer: 19/673/0060/3 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- From mach at zhaw.ch Tue Dec 17 15:25:08 2013 From: mach at zhaw.ch (Christof Marti) Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 15:25:08 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-miwi] miwi GE infos In-Reply-To: <3dac34957c2c4cf99d3f2e4d3adb6559@SRV-MAIL-001.zhaw.ch> References: <52AB72ED.9040600@tid.es> <9AED604A-EDCC-4CBF-A3F4-88DA91DC703C@playsign.net> <52AD4F82.7010303@dfki.de> <22228ee4df844a4bb7a53cd8e9b05805@SRV-MAIL-001.zhaw.ch> <28a65332763441ad97f65f34bab43f70@SRV-MAIL-001.zhaw.ch> <3dac34957c2c4cf99d3f2e4d3adb6559@SRV-MAIL-001.zhaw.ch> Message-ID: <57AA9A1A-E9CA-41DC-BC5C-9D0E0A68BCAE@zhaw.ch> Hi Attached a first version of the Presentation. (I am still working on it and have to add the demo-links to the table) Still some questions regarding availability now and in R3.2: What is the status there (now, January) for 2D-3D-Capture and Virtual Characters? Thanks for any other comment and feedback Best regards Christof Am 17.12.2013 um 10:27 schrieb Marti Christof (mach) : > Hi everybody > > Thanks for all who provided their infos already to the Spreadsheet and sent the slides. > I will try to put together the slide deck until about 13:00 today and send it to you for feedback. > > Some points to the spreadsheet: > 1. If your GE implementation has a name please add it to column B. > 2. Be honest about the status of the Open API description. Not all APIs do really have the status "Draft" yet. (e.g. DaaS is completely missing in the Wiki, some have almost no content, others are better but still brief) > 3. Most important is, what is delivered in R3.2 (Fi-WARE R3, should not be empty) > 4. For those GE, which are difficult to demonstrate because of specific HW/SW restrictions, it would be great to have a video showing the current status. > > Thanks > Christof > ---- > InIT Cloud Computing Lab - ICCLab http://cloudcomp.ch > Institut of Applied Information Technology - InIT > Zurich University of Applied Sciences - ZHAW > School of Engineering > Phone: +41 58 934 70 63 > Skype: christof-marti > > > > Am 16.12.2013 um 18:05 schrieb Marti Christof (mach) : > >> Dear WP13 GE owners and partners >> >> Sorry for coming back to you so late. >> It was not exactly clear how the questions will be addressed at the review meeting on Wednesday. >> I joined now the rehearsal meeting in Brussels (after an traveling for 7h because of delayed and missed flights), where we prepare the content for the review. >> After todays discussion, the structure is more clear now. >> >> I will present the status of WP13 and all its GEs in a very short slot (max 5 min.) >> Therefore I would like to have 1 slide with a short overview per GE, in table-form with the following fields: >> (these should only relate to the FI-WARE GEis features / not commercial additions) >> GE-Name: generic name of the GE >> GEI-Name: name of the specific implementation >> Partner(s) involved: >> Terms&Conditions: (Exact type of license for the GEi: commercial xxx, ?, Apache 2, MIT, GPLv2,.?) >> Status (Open API): now (not avail yet, early draft, draft, preliminary, final), reason why and why available. >> Current status: What is available at this moment >> What?s available in M33 (R3.2): 2-3 major features (or full functionality) >> What?s available in M36 (R3.3): additional features (or full functionality) >> Planned to be available in FI-LAB? yes/no (how: blue-print, vm image, global instance, demo app) >> Demo-Links >> To add this I prepared a Google Spreadsheet. Please complete it for your GE. >> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Auieh_fs3EUxdEhYRnVwN3lzcHF1dFU3elh0R2ZTd1E#gid=0 >> (I will then see, if I can compact and reduce the amount of data, columns, ? for the slide) >> >> I will add a summary slide of the WP13 status at all: >> Common points, OpenSpecification, Manuals, deliverables, ? >> (I also have a Word version of the OpenSpecification with me) >> >> Then I would like to prepare 1 slide per partner where he can elaborate on >> Examination plans >> Dissemination activities (executed, planned) >> Other comments (planned usage of UC-projects, reasons why something might get delayed, ?) >> Not sure if it will be used, but in case there are questions I can select the slide and show it. >> Please use the attached template for your slide. >> >> I saw some of you sent already some content. It?s fastest if you add it to >> >> Deadline for all of the above is: Tomorrow Tuesday noon (12:00) >> (the earlier the better, because I also have to put it together to a nice presentation) >> >> Thanks for your support. >> >> Best regards >> Christof >> ---- >> InIT Cloud Computing Lab - ICCLab http://cloudcomp.ch >> Institut of Applied Information Technology - InIT >> Zurich University of Applied Sciences - ZHAW >> School of Engineering >> Phone: +41 58 934 70 63 >> Skype: christof-marti >> > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-miwi mailing list > Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE_M30_Review_WP13-Status_v1.pptx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentation Size: 213915 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lasse.oorni at ludocraft.com Tue Dec 17 15:55:35 2013 From: lasse.oorni at ludocraft.com (=?iso-8859-1?Q?=22Lasse_=D6=F6rni=22?=) Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 16:55:35 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-miwi] miwi GE infos In-Reply-To: <57AA9A1A-E9CA-41DC-BC5C-9D0E0A68BCAE@zhaw.ch> References: <52AB72ED.9040600@tid.es> <9AED604A-EDCC-4CBF-A3F4-88DA91DC703C@playsign.net> <52AD4F82.7010303@dfki.de> <22228ee4df844a4bb7a53cd8e9b05805@SRV-MAIL-001.zhaw.ch> <28a65332763441ad97f65f34bab43f70@SRV-MAIL-001.zhaw.ch> <3dac34957c2c4cf99d3f2e4d3adb6559@SRV-MAIL-001.zhaw.ch> <57AA9A1A-E9CA-41DC-BC5C-9D0E0A68BCAE@zhaw.ch> Message-ID: <70837ecffcbc53cc40a01801f5b12371.squirrel@urho.ludocraft.com> > Hi > > Attached a first version of the Presentation. > (I am still working on it and have to add the demo-links to the table) > Still some questions regarding availability now and in R3.2: > What is the status there (now, January) for 2D-3D-Capture and Virtual > Characters? Hi, for Virtual Characters there is no implementation now. The (little) documentation that has been written is from the point of what it will be like. It's very doubtful the situation will change for R3.2. -- Lasse ??rni Game Programmer LudoCraft Ltd. From jarkko at cyberlightning.com Wed Dec 18 08:36:00 2013 From: jarkko at cyberlightning.com (Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila) Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 09:36:00 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-miwi] meeting agenda/minutes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hello, Just wondering: since I guess there is going to be a review meeting around this time in Brussels, are we going to have our weekly meeting normally. Thanks, - jarkko On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Christof Marti wrote: > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WKRjnGcsA3T2Bv5UIntQcVS5Mwx6u5bfgMFu4bXDJtY/edit# > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-miwi mailing list > Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi > -- Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila VP, Technology Cyberlightning Ltd. mobile. +358 405245142 email. jarkko at cyberlightning.com Go to www.cybersli.de and enrich your presentations! www.cyberlightning.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mach at zhaw.ch Wed Dec 18 09:39:54 2013 From: mach at zhaw.ch (Christof Marti) Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 09:39:54 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-miwi] meeting agenda/minutes In-Reply-To: <020c2a3608854ccb9b1150cf95447156@SRV-MAIL-001.zhaw.ch> References: <020c2a3608854ccb9b1150cf95447156@SRV-MAIL-001.zhaw.ch> Message-ID: <6A45E3AC-99D4-4B6C-8A3E-CE130268D986@zhaw.ch> Hi Jarkko, hi all As announced last week, todays meeting is canceled because of the review. (I will send you infos about the status tonight after the meeting) How is your availability tomorrow Thursday morning? Would it be possible to have a short meeting at 08:00-08:45 CET? I have a doctors appointment for my backbone injection at 09:15. So I am not available the rest of the morning and in the afternoon and Friday morning I am booked with lecturing. Next option would be Friday 14:00-15:00CET. Best regards Christof ---- InIT Cloud Computing Lab - ICCLab http://cloudcomp.ch Institut of Applied Information Technology - InIT Zurich University of Applied Sciences - ZHAW School of Engineering Phone: +41 58 934 70 63 Skype: christof-marti Am 18.12.2013 um 08:36 schrieb Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila : > Hello, > > Just wondering: since I guess there is going to be a review meeting around this time in Brussels, are we going to have our weekly meeting normally. > > Thanks, > > - jarkko > > > On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Christof Marti wrote: > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WKRjnGcsA3T2Bv5UIntQcVS5Mwx6u5bfgMFu4bXDJtY/edit# > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-miwi mailing list > Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi > > > > -- > Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila > VP, Technology > Cyberlightning Ltd. > > mobile. +358 405245142 > email. jarkko at cyberlightning.com > > Go to www.cybersli.de and enrich your presentations! > > www.cyberlightning.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From toni at playsign.net Wed Dec 18 09:42:21 2013 From: toni at playsign.net (Toni Alatalo) Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 10:42:21 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-miwi] meeting agenda/minutes In-Reply-To: <6A45E3AC-99D4-4B6C-8A3E-CE130268D986@zhaw.ch> References: <020c2a3608854ccb9b1150cf95447156@SRV-MAIL-001.zhaw.ch> <6A45E3AC-99D4-4B6C-8A3E-CE130268D986@zhaw.ch> Message-ID: Tomorrow morning is fine for us at least. On 18 Dec 2013, at 10:39, Christof Marti wrote: > Hi Jarkko, hi all > > As announced last week, todays meeting is canceled because of the review. (I will send you infos about the status tonight after the meeting) > > How is your availability tomorrow Thursday morning? > Would it be possible to have a short meeting at 08:00-08:45 CET? > I have a doctors appointment for my backbone injection at 09:15. So I am not available the rest of the morning and in the afternoon and Friday morning I am booked with lecturing. > Next option would be Friday 14:00-15:00CET. > > Best regards > Christof > ---- > InIT Cloud Computing Lab - ICCLab http://cloudcomp.ch > Institut of Applied Information Technology - InIT > Zurich University of Applied Sciences - ZHAW > School of Engineering > Phone: +41 58 934 70 63 > Skype: christof-marti > > Am 18.12.2013 um 08:36 schrieb Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila : > >> Hello, >> >> Just wondering: since I guess there is going to be a review meeting around this time in Brussels, are we going to have our weekly meeting normally. >> >> Thanks, >> >> - jarkko >> >> >> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Christof Marti wrote: >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WKRjnGcsA3T2Bv5UIntQcVS5Mwx6u5bfgMFu4bXDJtY/edit# >> _______________________________________________ >> Fiware-miwi mailing list >> Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu >> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi >> >> >> >> -- >> Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila >> VP, Technology >> Cyberlightning Ltd. >> >> mobile. +358 405245142 >> email. jarkko at cyberlightning.com >> >> Go to www.cybersli.de and enrich your presentations! >> >> www.cyberlightning.com > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-miwi mailing list > Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jarkko at cyberlightning.com Wed Dec 18 09:43:35 2013 From: jarkko at cyberlightning.com (Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila) Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 10:43:35 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-miwi] meeting agenda/minutes In-Reply-To: <6A45E3AC-99D4-4B6C-8A3E-CE130268D986@zhaw.ch> References: <020c2a3608854ccb9b1150cf95447156@SRV-MAIL-001.zhaw.ch> <6A45E3AC-99D4-4B6C-8A3E-CE130268D986@zhaw.ch> Message-ID: All right! Thursday schedule does not work for me. Friday schedule would work. So I vote for that! On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Christof Marti wrote: > Hi Jarkko, hi all > > As announced last week, todays meeting is canceled because of the review. > (I will send you infos about the status tonight after the meeting) > > How is your availability tomorrow Thursday morning? > Would it be possible to have a short meeting at 08:00-08:45 CET? > I have a doctors appointment for my backbone injection at 09:15. So I am > not available the rest of the morning and in the afternoon and Friday > morning I am booked with lecturing. > Next option would be Friday 14:00-15:00CET. > > Best regards > Christof > ---- > InIT Cloud Computing Lab - ICCLab http://cloudcomp.ch > Institut of Applied Information Technology - InIT > Zurich University of Applied Sciences - ZHAW > School of Engineering > Phone: +41 58 934 70 63 > Skype: christof-marti > > Am 18.12.2013 um 08:36 schrieb Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila < > jarkko at cyberlightning.com>: > > Hello, > > Just wondering: since I guess there is going to be a review meeting around > this time in Brussels, are we going to have our weekly meeting normally. > > Thanks, > > - jarkko > > > On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Christof Marti wrote: > >> >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WKRjnGcsA3T2Bv5UIntQcVS5Mwx6u5bfgMFu4bXDJtY/edit# >> _______________________________________________ >> Fiware-miwi mailing list >> Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu >> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi >> > > > > -- > Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila > VP, Technology > Cyberlightning Ltd. > > mobile. +358 405245142 > email. jarkko at cyberlightning.com > > Go to www.cybersli.de and enrich your presentations! > > www.cyberlightning.com > > > -- Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila VP, Technology Cyberlightning Ltd. mobile. +358 405245142 email. jarkko at cyberlightning.com Go to www.cybersli.de and enrich your presentations! www.cyberlightning.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lasse.oorni at ludocraft.com Wed Dec 18 09:56:16 2013 From: lasse.oorni at ludocraft.com (=?iso-8859-1?Q?=22Lasse_=D6=F6rni=22?=) Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 10:56:16 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-miwi] meeting agenda/minutes In-Reply-To: References: <020c2a3608854ccb9b1150cf95447156@SRV-MAIL-001.zhaw.ch> <6A45E3AC-99D4-4B6C-8A3E-CE130268D986@zhaw.ch> Message-ID: <768496d49aa7cdf327af552215dbd98c.squirrel@urho.ludocraft.com> Thursday and friday both fine. - Lasse > All right! Thursday schedule does not work for me. Friday schedule would > work. So I vote for that! > > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Christof Marti wrote: > >> Hi Jarkko, hi all >> >> As announced last week, todays meeting is canceled because of the >> review. >> (I will send you infos about the status tonight after the meeting) >> >> How is your availability tomorrow Thursday morning? >> Would it be possible to have a short meeting at 08:00-08:45 CET? >> I have a doctors appointment for my backbone injection at 09:15. So I am >> not available the rest of the morning and in the afternoon and Friday >> morning I am booked with lecturing. >> Next option would be Friday 14:00-15:00CET. >> >> Best regards >> Christof >> ---- >> InIT Cloud Computing Lab - ICCLab http://cloudcomp.ch >> Institut of Applied Information Technology - InIT >> Zurich University of Applied Sciences - ZHAW >> School of Engineering >> Phone: +41 58 934 70 63 >> Skype: christof-marti >> >> Am 18.12.2013 um 08:36 schrieb Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila < >> jarkko at cyberlightning.com>: >> >> Hello, >> >> Just wondering: since I guess there is going to be a review meeting >> around >> this time in Brussels, are we going to have our weekly meeting normally. >> >> Thanks, >> >> - jarkko >> >> >> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Christof Marti wrote: >> >>> >>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WKRjnGcsA3T2Bv5UIntQcVS5Mwx6u5bfgMFu4bXDJtY/edit# >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Fiware-miwi mailing list >>> Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu >>> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila >> VP, Technology >> Cyberlightning Ltd. >> >> mobile. +358 405245142 >> email. jarkko at cyberlightning.com >> >> Go to www.cybersli.de and enrich your presentations! >> >> www.cyberlightning.com >> >> >> > > > -- > Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila > VP, Technology > Cyberlightning Ltd. > > mobile. +358 405245142 > email. jarkko at cyberlightning.com > > Go to www.cybersli.de and enrich your presentations! > > www.cyberlightning.com > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-miwi mailing list > Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi > From toni at playsign.net Wed Dec 18 10:12:05 2013 From: toni at playsign.net (Toni Alatalo) Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 11:12:05 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-miwi] meeting agenda/minutes In-Reply-To: <768496d49aa7cdf327af552215dbd98c.squirrel@urho.ludocraft.com> References: <020c2a3608854ccb9b1150cf95447156@SRV-MAIL-001.zhaw.ch> <6A45E3AC-99D4-4B6C-8A3E-CE130268D986@zhaw.ch> <768496d49aa7cdf327af552215dbd98c.squirrel@urho.ludocraft.com> Message-ID: Same here, both work. On 18 Dec 2013, at 10:56, Lasse ??rni wrote: > Thursday and friday both fine. > > - Lasse > >> All right! Thursday schedule does not work for me. Friday schedule would >> work. So I vote for that! >> >> >> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Christof Marti wrote: >> >>> Hi Jarkko, hi all >>> >>> As announced last week, todays meeting is canceled because of the >>> review. >>> (I will send you infos about the status tonight after the meeting) >>> >>> How is your availability tomorrow Thursday morning? >>> Would it be possible to have a short meeting at 08:00-08:45 CET? >>> I have a doctors appointment for my backbone injection at 09:15. So I am >>> not available the rest of the morning and in the afternoon and Friday >>> morning I am booked with lecturing. >>> Next option would be Friday 14:00-15:00CET. >>> >>> Best regards >>> Christof >>> ---- >>> InIT Cloud Computing Lab - ICCLab http://cloudcomp.ch >>> Institut of Applied Information Technology - InIT >>> Zurich University of Applied Sciences - ZHAW >>> School of Engineering >>> Phone: +41 58 934 70 63 >>> Skype: christof-marti >>> >>> Am 18.12.2013 um 08:36 schrieb Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila < >>> jarkko at cyberlightning.com>: >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> Just wondering: since I guess there is going to be a review meeting >>> around >>> this time in Brussels, are we going to have our weekly meeting normally. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> - jarkko >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Christof Marti wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WKRjnGcsA3T2Bv5UIntQcVS5Mwx6u5bfgMFu4bXDJtY/edit# >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Fiware-miwi mailing list >>>> Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu >>>> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila >>> VP, Technology >>> Cyberlightning Ltd. >>> >>> mobile. +358 405245142 >>> email. jarkko at cyberlightning.com >>> >>> Go to www.cybersli.de and enrich your presentations! >>> >>> www.cyberlightning.com >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila >> VP, Technology >> Cyberlightning Ltd. >> >> mobile. +358 405245142 >> email. jarkko at cyberlightning.com >> >> Go to www.cybersli.de and enrich your presentations! >> >> www.cyberlightning.com >> _______________________________________________ >> Fiware-miwi mailing list >> Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu >> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-miwi mailing list > Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi From jonne at adminotech.com Wed Dec 18 10:16:30 2013 From: jonne at adminotech.com (Jonne Nauha) Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 11:16:30 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-miwi] meeting agenda/minutes In-Reply-To: References: <020c2a3608854ccb9b1150cf95447156@SRV-MAIL-001.zhaw.ch> <6A45E3AC-99D4-4B6C-8A3E-CE130268D986@zhaw.ch> <768496d49aa7cdf327af552215dbd98c.squirrel@urho.ludocraft.com> Message-ID: Just say the time, we can attend both days also. Best regards, Jonne Nauha Meshmoon developer at Adminotech Ltd. www.meshmoon.com On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Toni Alatalo wrote: > Same here, both work. > > On 18 Dec 2013, at 10:56, Lasse ??rni wrote: > > > Thursday and friday both fine. > > > > - Lasse > > > >> All right! Thursday schedule does not work for me. Friday schedule would > >> work. So I vote for that! > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Christof Marti wrote: > >> > >>> Hi Jarkko, hi all > >>> > >>> As announced last week, todays meeting is canceled because of the > >>> review. > >>> (I will send you infos about the status tonight after the meeting) > >>> > >>> How is your availability tomorrow Thursday morning? > >>> Would it be possible to have a short meeting at 08:00-08:45 CET? > >>> I have a doctors appointment for my backbone injection at 09:15. So I > am > >>> not available the rest of the morning and in the afternoon and Friday > >>> morning I am booked with lecturing. > >>> Next option would be Friday 14:00-15:00CET. > >>> > >>> Best regards > >>> Christof > >>> ---- > >>> InIT Cloud Computing Lab - ICCLab http://cloudcomp.ch > >>> Institut of Applied Information Technology - InIT > >>> Zurich University of Applied Sciences - ZHAW > >>> School of Engineering > >>> Phone: +41 58 934 70 63 > >>> Skype: christof-marti > >>> > >>> Am 18.12.2013 um 08:36 schrieb Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila < > >>> jarkko at cyberlightning.com>: > >>> > >>> Hello, > >>> > >>> Just wondering: since I guess there is going to be a review meeting > >>> around > >>> this time in Brussels, are we going to have our weekly meeting > normally. > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> > >>> - jarkko > >>> > >>> > >>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Christof Marti wrote: > >>> > >>>> > >>>> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WKRjnGcsA3T2Bv5UIntQcVS5Mwx6u5bfgMFu4bXDJtY/edit# > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> Fiware-miwi mailing list > >>>> Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu > >>>> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila > >>> VP, Technology > >>> Cyberlightning Ltd. > >>> > >>> mobile. +358 405245142 > >>> email. jarkko at cyberlightning.com > >>> > >>> Go to www.cybersli.de and enrich your presentations! > >>> > >>> www.cyberlightning.com > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila > >> VP, Technology > >> Cyberlightning Ltd. > >> > >> mobile. +358 405245142 > >> email. jarkko at cyberlightning.com > >> > >> Go to www.cybersli.de and enrich your presentations! > >> > >> www.cyberlightning.com > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Fiware-miwi mailing list > >> Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu > >> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Fiware-miwi mailing list > > Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu > > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-miwi mailing list > Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jarkko at cyberlightning.com Wed Dec 18 10:21:36 2013 From: jarkko at cyberlightning.com (Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila) Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 11:21:36 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-miwi] meeting agenda/minutes In-Reply-To: References: <020c2a3608854ccb9b1150cf95447156@SRV-MAIL-001.zhaw.ch> <6A45E3AC-99D4-4B6C-8A3E-CE130268D986@zhaw.ch> <768496d49aa7cdf327af552215dbd98c.squirrel@urho.ludocraft.com> Message-ID: I checked (and reorganized) my schedule and I can make thursday to work as well, if that suits for everyone else. So, either way, thursday or friday. On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Jonne Nauha wrote: > Just say the time, we can attend both days also. > > Best regards, > Jonne Nauha > Meshmoon developer at Adminotech Ltd. > www.meshmoon.com > > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Toni Alatalo wrote: > >> Same here, both work. >> >> On 18 Dec 2013, at 10:56, Lasse ??rni wrote: >> >> > Thursday and friday both fine. >> > >> > - Lasse >> > >> >> All right! Thursday schedule does not work for me. Friday schedule >> would >> >> work. So I vote for that! >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Christof Marti wrote: >> >> >> >>> Hi Jarkko, hi all >> >>> >> >>> As announced last week, todays meeting is canceled because of the >> >>> review. >> >>> (I will send you infos about the status tonight after the meeting) >> >>> >> >>> How is your availability tomorrow Thursday morning? >> >>> Would it be possible to have a short meeting at 08:00-08:45 CET? >> >>> I have a doctors appointment for my backbone injection at 09:15. So I >> am >> >>> not available the rest of the morning and in the afternoon and Friday >> >>> morning I am booked with lecturing. >> >>> Next option would be Friday 14:00-15:00CET. >> >>> >> >>> Best regards >> >>> Christof >> >>> ---- >> >>> InIT Cloud Computing Lab - ICCLab http://cloudcomp.ch >> >>> Institut of Applied Information Technology - InIT >> >>> Zurich University of Applied Sciences - ZHAW >> >>> School of Engineering >> >>> Phone: +41 58 934 70 63 >> >>> Skype: christof-marti >> >>> >> >>> Am 18.12.2013 um 08:36 schrieb Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila < >> >>> jarkko at cyberlightning.com>: >> >>> >> >>> Hello, >> >>> >> >>> Just wondering: since I guess there is going to be a review meeting >> >>> around >> >>> this time in Brussels, are we going to have our weekly meeting >> normally. >> >>> >> >>> Thanks, >> >>> >> >>> - jarkko >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Christof Marti >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WKRjnGcsA3T2Bv5UIntQcVS5Mwx6u5bfgMFu4bXDJtY/edit# >> >>>> _______________________________________________ >> >>>> Fiware-miwi mailing list >> >>>> Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu >> >>>> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila >> >>> VP, Technology >> >>> Cyberlightning Ltd. >> >>> >> >>> mobile. +358 405245142 >> >>> email. jarkko at cyberlightning.com >> >>> >> >>> Go to www.cybersli.de and enrich your presentations! >> >>> >> >>> www.cyberlightning.com >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila >> >> VP, Technology >> >> Cyberlightning Ltd. >> >> >> >> mobile. +358 405245142 >> >> email. jarkko at cyberlightning.com >> >> >> >> Go to www.cybersli.de and enrich your presentations! >> >> >> >> www.cyberlightning.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Fiware-miwi mailing list >> >> Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu >> >> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi >> >> >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Fiware-miwi mailing list >> > Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu >> > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Fiware-miwi mailing list >> Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu >> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-miwi mailing list > Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi > > -- Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila VP, Technology Cyberlightning Ltd. mobile. +358 405245142 email. jarkko at cyberlightning.com Go to www.cybersli.de and enrich your presentations! www.cyberlightning.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From torsten.spieldenner at dfki.de Wed Dec 18 10:24:58 2013 From: torsten.spieldenner at dfki.de (Torsten Spieldenner) Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 10:24:58 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-miwi] meeting agenda/minutes In-Reply-To: <6A45E3AC-99D4-4B6C-8A3E-CE130268D986@zhaw.ch> References: <020c2a3608854ccb9b1150cf95447156@SRV-MAIL-001.zhaw.ch> <6A45E3AC-99D4-4B6C-8A3E-CE130268D986@zhaw.ch> Message-ID: <52B169EA.6060002@dfki.de> Hello, Both times work for me ~ Torsten Am 12/18/2013 9:39 AM, schrieb Christof Marti: > Hi Jarkko, hi all > > As announced last week, todays meeting is canceled because of the review. (I will send you infos about the status tonight after the meeting) > > How is your availability tomorrow Thursday morning? > Would it be possible to have a short meeting at 08:00-08:45 CET? > I have a doctors appointment for my backbone injection at 09:15. So I am not available the rest of the morning and in the afternoon and Friday morning I am booked with lecturing. > Next option would be Friday 14:00-15:00CET. > > Best regards > Christof > ---- > InIT Cloud Computing Lab - ICCLab http://cloudcomp.ch > Institut of Applied Information Technology - InIT > Zurich University of Applied Sciences - ZHAW > School of Engineering > Phone: +41 58 934 70 63 > Skype: christof-marti > > Am 18.12.2013 um 08:36 schrieb Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila : > >> Hello, >> >> Just wondering: since I guess there is going to be a review meeting around this time in Brussels, are we going to have our weekly meeting normally. >> >> Thanks, >> >> - jarkko >> >> >> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Christof Marti wrote: >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WKRjnGcsA3T2Bv5UIntQcVS5Mwx6u5bfgMFu4bXDJtY/edit# >> _______________________________________________ >> Fiware-miwi mailing list >> Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu >> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi >> >> >> >> -- >> Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila >> VP, Technology >> Cyberlightning Ltd. >> >> mobile. +358 405245142 >> email. jarkko at cyberlightning.com >> >> Go to www.cybersli.de and enrich your presentations! >> >> www.cyberlightning.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-miwi mailing list > Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Philipp.Slusallek at dfki.de Wed Dec 18 10:56:18 2013 From: Philipp.Slusallek at dfki.de (Philipp Slusallek) Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 10:56:18 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-miwi] meeting agenda/minutes In-Reply-To: <6A45E3AC-99D4-4B6C-8A3E-CE130268D986@zhaw.ch> References: <020c2a3608854ccb9b1150cf95447156@SRV-MAIL-001.zhaw.ch> <6A45E3AC-99D4-4B6C-8A3E-CE130268D986@zhaw.ch> Message-ID: <52B17142.1030401@dfki.de> Hi, Unfortunately, neither Thu morning (travel to an external partner) nor Fri 14h (PhD defense) does work for me. But the meeting will be mainly about deliverables and organization anyway, which you can also do without me. I just want to highlight, that its important that we deliver a solid release soon that others can start using and rely upon, including all the necessary documentation. We should very openly and critically review our own material and that our all partners in that respect (including our DFKI contributions of course!). Its better that we find flaws ourselves than others telling us about embarrassing issues. We do not deliver the material for the commission but for other. Or as someone has said: Our stuff should be "useful, usable, and actually be used" (e.g. by upcoming Phase-3 projects). I think, we are on a very good track here already but some work certainly still remains (also on our side). Best, Philipp Am 18.12.2013 09:39, schrieb Christof Marti: > Hi Jarkko, hi all > > As announced last week, todays meeting is canceled because of the > review. (I will send you infos about the status tonight after the meeting) > > How is your availability tomorrow Thursday morning? > Would it be possible to have a short meeting at 08:00-08:45 CET? > I have a doctors appointment for my backbone injection at 09:15. So I am > not available the rest of the morning and in the afternoon and Friday > morning I am booked with lecturing. > Next option would be Friday 14:00-15:00CET. > > Best regards > Christof > ---- > InIT Cloud Computing Lab - ICCLab http://cloudcomp.ch > Institut of Applied Information Technology - InIT > Zurich University of Applied Sciences - ZHAW > School of Engineering > Phone: +41 58 934 70 63 > Skype: christof-marti > > Am 18.12.2013 um 08:36 schrieb Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila > >: > >> Hello, >> >> Just wondering: since I guess there is going to be a review meeting >> around this time in Brussels, are we going to have our weekly meeting >> normally. >> >> Thanks, >> >> - jarkko >> >> >> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Christof Marti > > wrote: >> >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WKRjnGcsA3T2Bv5UIntQcVS5Mwx6u5bfgMFu4bXDJtY/edit# >> _______________________________________________ >> Fiware-miwi mailing list >> Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu >> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila >> VP, Technology >> Cyberlightning Ltd. >> >> mobile. +358 405245142 >> email. jarkko at cyberlightning.com >> >> Go to www.cybersli.de and enrich your >> presentations! >> >> www.cyberlightning.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-miwi mailing list > Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi > -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Deutsches Forschungszentrum f?r K?nstliche Intelligenz (DFKI) GmbH Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern Gesch?ftsf?hrung: Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender) Dr. Walter Olthoff Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes Sitz der Gesellschaft: Kaiserslautern (HRB 2313) USt-Id.Nr.: DE 148646973, Steuernummer: 19/673/0060/3 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: slusallek.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 441 bytes Desc: not available URL: From kari.autio at cie.fi Wed Dec 18 11:02:56 2013 From: kari.autio at cie.fi (Kari Autio) Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 12:02:56 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-miwi] meeting agenda/minutes In-Reply-To: <6A45E3AC-99D4-4B6C-8A3E-CE130268D986@zhaw.ch> References: <020c2a3608854ccb9b1150cf95447156@SRV-MAIL-001.zhaw.ch> <6A45E3AC-99D4-4B6C-8A3E-CE130268D986@zhaw.ch> Message-ID: both ok Kari Autio Chief Technology Officer Center for Internet Excellence (CIE) P.O. BOX 1001, FIN-90014 University of Oulu, Finland kari.autio at cie.fi +358 40 167 6545 www.cie.fi 2013/12/18 Christof Marti > Hi Jarkko, hi all > > As announced last week, todays meeting is canceled because of the review. > (I will send you infos about the status tonight after the meeting) > > How is your availability tomorrow Thursday morning? > Would it be possible to have a short meeting at 08:00-08:45 CET? > I have a doctors appointment for my backbone injection at 09:15. So I am > not available the rest of the morning and in the afternoon and Friday > morning I am booked with lecturing. > Next option would be Friday 14:00-15:00CET. > > Best regards > Christof > ---- > InIT Cloud Computing Lab - ICCLab http://cloudcomp.ch > Institut of Applied Information Technology - InIT > Zurich University of Applied Sciences - ZHAW > School of Engineering > Phone: +41 58 934 70 63 > Skype: christof-marti > > Am 18.12.2013 um 08:36 schrieb Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila < > jarkko at cyberlightning.com>: > > Hello, > > Just wondering: since I guess there is going to be a review meeting around > this time in Brussels, are we going to have our weekly meeting normally. > > Thanks, > > - jarkko > > > On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Christof Marti wrote: > >> >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WKRjnGcsA3T2Bv5UIntQcVS5Mwx6u5bfgMFu4bXDJtY/edit# >> _______________________________________________ >> Fiware-miwi mailing list >> Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu >> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi >> > > > > -- > Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila > VP, Technology > Cyberlightning Ltd. > > mobile. +358 405245142 > email. jarkko at cyberlightning.com > > Go to www.cybersli.de and enrich your presentations! > > www.cyberlightning.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-miwi mailing list > Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mach at zhaw.ch Wed Dec 18 12:01:44 2013 From: mach at zhaw.ch (Christof Marti) Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 12:01:44 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-miwi] meeting agenda/minutes In-Reply-To: References: <020c2a3608854ccb9b1150cf95447156@SRV-MAIL-001.zhaw.ch> <6A45E3AC-99D4-4B6C-8A3E-CE130268D986@zhaw.ch> Message-ID: Ok Lets book the slot tomorrow Thursday 8:00-8:45. Main points will be about the guides and SW delivery. I wan't to have the manuals ready before Christmas! We have no wifi internet in the review room. So communication is limited here.:) Christof Sent from my phone. Excuse my brevity. > Am 18.12.2013 um 11:02 schrieb Kari Autio : > > both ok > > Kari Autio > Chief Technology Officer > Center for Internet Excellence (CIE) > P.O. BOX 1001, FIN-90014 University of Oulu, Finland > kari.autio at cie.fi +358 40 167 6545 www.cie.fi > > > 2013/12/18 Christof Marti >> Hi Jarkko, hi all >> >> As announced last week, todays meeting is canceled because of the review. (I will send you infos about the status tonight after the meeting) >> >> How is your availability tomorrow Thursday morning? >> Would it be possible to have a short meeting at 08:00-08:45 CET? >> I have a doctors appointment for my backbone injection at 09:15. So I am not available the rest of the morning and in the afternoon and Friday morning I am booked with lecturing. >> Next option would be Friday 14:00-15:00CET. >> >> Best regards >> Christof >> ---- >> InIT Cloud Computing Lab - ICCLab http://cloudcomp.ch >> Institut of Applied Information Technology - InIT >> Zurich University of Applied Sciences - ZHAW >> School of Engineering >> Phone: +41 58 934 70 63 >> Skype: christof-marti >> >>> Am 18.12.2013 um 08:36 schrieb Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila : >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> Just wondering: since I guess there is going to be a review meeting around this time in Brussels, are we going to have our weekly meeting normally. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> - jarkko >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Christof Marti wrote: >>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WKRjnGcsA3T2Bv5UIntQcVS5Mwx6u5bfgMFu4bXDJtY/edit# >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Fiware-miwi mailing list >>>> Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu >>>> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila >>> VP, Technology >>> Cyberlightning Ltd. >>> >>> mobile. +358 405245142 >>> email. jarkko at cyberlightning.com >>> >>> Go to www.cybersli.de and enrich your presentations! >>> >>> www.cyberlightning.com >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Fiware-miwi mailing list >> Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu >> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mach at zhaw.ch Thu Dec 19 07:41:31 2013 From: mach at zhaw.ch (Christof Marti) Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 07:41:31 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-miwi] Minutes/agenda of todays meeting Message-ID: Hi Minutes and agenda of todays meeting: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wr4n7gKCIr2SP01wjb6G5PAkFRamwFHTVvg8_030M6M/edit I?m still traveling and might be late 10? Opening the bridge 08:10 Christof ---- InIT Cloud Computing Lab - ICCLab http://cloudcomp.ch Institut of Applied Information Technology - InIT Zurich University of Applied Sciences - ZHAW School of Engineering P.O.Box, CH-8401 Winterthur Office:TD O3.18, Obere Kirchgasse 2 Phone: +41 58 934 70 63 Mail: mach at zhaw.ch Skype: christof-marti From marti.christof at gmail.com Thu Dec 19 08:08:00 2013 From: marti.christof at gmail.com (Christof Marti) Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 08:08:00 +0100 Subject: [Fiware-miwi] Minutes/agenda of todays meeting In-Reply-To: <2ec40e9c7b8c42b99d57b97d76e59ef2@SRV-MAIL-001.zhaw.ch> References: <2ec40e9c7b8c42b99d57b97d76e59ef2@SRV-MAIL-001.zhaw.ch> Message-ID: <33B0332E-93BF-4A07-9AA1-7684CB2810D5@gmail.com> Traffic yam. Move to 8:20. Sorry. Sent from my phone. Excuse my brevity. > Am 19.12.2013 um 07:41 schrieb "Marti Christof (mach)" : > > Hi > > Minutes and agenda of todays meeting: > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wr4n7gKCIr2SP01wjb6G5PAkFRamwFHTVvg8_030M6M/edit > > I?m still traveling and might be late 10? > Opening the bridge 08:10 > > Christof > ---- > InIT Cloud Computing Lab - ICCLab http://cloudcomp.ch > Institut of Applied Information Technology - InIT > Zurich University of Applied Sciences - ZHAW > School of Engineering > P.O.Box, CH-8401 Winterthur > Office:TD O3.18, Obere Kirchgasse 2 > Phone: +41 58 934 70 63 > Mail: mach at zhaw.ch > Skype: christof-marti > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-miwi mailing list > Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi From toni at playsign.net Fri Dec 20 10:14:36 2013 From: toni at playsign.net (Toni Alatalo) Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 11:14:36 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-miwi] no time (yet) for AR docs review Message-ID: <42BAF609-301F-4514-BE6E-AF764141C18C@playsign.net> hi, about reviewing the AR docs which was discussed in the meeting yesterday (there was no reviewer for it yet) ? just a quick info that I haven?t had time nor will very soon now (within 3-4 hours probably) so it?s up for grabs if someone has a chance. I did already review the POI docs for which was actually assigned, and we have our 3DUI parts largely in shape now too for review. anyhow if the AR one is still left at the end of the day I can review it latest in the evening, though hopefully already this the afternoon after a few hours. Cheers, ~Toni From mach at zhaw.ch Fri Dec 20 18:19:11 2013 From: mach at zhaw.ch (Marti Christof (mach)) Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 17:19:11 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-miwi] FI-WARE WP13 deliveries & M30 review Message-ID: <20B00792-69B6-47E3-B58B-09FFDD65CE39@zhaw.ch> Hi Some organizational points regarding the R3 delivery. As explained and discussed in the meeting this week, we are already late and it is still a lot of work to do. The dashboard for organization and status of the delivery is here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Auieh_fs3EUxdFVvY19ab1lFRDRUaTBrUXlpYzBVRlE&rm=full#gid=17 (The link is also available on the WP13 integration page in the FI-WARE private wiki) Process details: - Reviewers please (ASAP) check documents (thanks to those who already finished). You can use the provided review-doc for notes. - Please put a short status description to the Status column for each document (not avail, needs improvements, ?). - Direct communication between Reviewer and Author is requested to have an efficient process. - If the document is of good quality and complete, from a reviewers POV, please set the status. ?Ready for review submission? - I will do a final check and submit it (in bunches) for review to Miguel. - I will send a first bunch with the ready documents at Monday Noon. And a second bunch after Christmas at Thursday evening. It is very important to have a on-time and high-quality delivery in January, because this is the release which is submitted officially. (I already stated in the M30 review presentation, that most GEs will deliver a additional release in M35). For any questions regarding the documentation, please consult the instruction manuals (linked from the dashboard) and if there are still unclear points please don?t hesitate to ask. Some infos about the FI-WARE M30 review this week. You all got the email from Juanjo regarding the first feedback of the reviewers. A detailed review report and recommendations will follow (sometime beginning of next year). Presentation of WP13 (as many others) was canceled because we were running out of time. Reviewers will consult the delivered presentations and come back with specific questions, if required. You?ll find the presentations (incl. WP13 status) here: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/index.php?group_id=27# Finally I want to thank you all for your good and enthusiastic work and contributions in 2013. Best regards, a merry Christmas and a successful 2014. Christof ---- InIT Cloud Computing Lab - ICCLab http://cloudcomp.ch Institut of Applied Information Technology - InIT Zurich University of Applied Sciences - ZHAW School of Engineering P.O.Box, CH-8401 Winterthur Office:TD O3.18, Obere Kirchgasse 2 Phone: +41 58 934 70 63 Mail: mach at zhaw.ch Skype: christof-marti From toni at playsign.net Sun Dec 22 08:58:07 2013 From: toni at playsign.net (Toni Alatalo) Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2013 09:58:07 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-miwi] doc reviews: did AR review, finished edits for 3DUI-WebTundra parts Message-ID: <97934C0A-A431-4A43-93B2-4E889A2AF146@playsign.net> Hi again, I know the idea in the reviews is to discuss directly with authors & reviewers, but as the orphan AR review was discussed in the meeting and here earlier figured that it?s best to inform that I now had the time and completed the review of it too. It?s largely ok, only missing something in the installation guide to verify the installation (for example by opening one of the tests or so? i added a note in the review gdoc that created). Also our edits for the 3DUI-WebTundra docs are finished for now ? were otherwise completed on Friday already (when Jarkko was planning to review) but I now added info about tests too. The tests are largely not implemented yet (nor the whole glTF-supporting asset pipeline feature) but I went with the idea that we are now documenting the January release and documented tests for the the work-in-progress & planned feats. I?ll post separately a before-christmas update on the entity system work & state of synchronization-3dui integration still, but this now just as a note about review and docs status. Cheers, ~Toni From jarkko at cyberlightning.com Sun Dec 22 09:35:31 2013 From: jarkko at cyberlightning.com (Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila) Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2013 10:35:31 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-miwi] doc reviews: did AR review, finished edits for 3DUI-WebTundra parts In-Reply-To: <97934C0A-A431-4A43-93B2-4E889A2AF146@playsign.net> References: <97934C0A-A431-4A43-93B2-4E889A2AF146@playsign.net> Message-ID: As a continuance, I wrote a few brief notes about the WebTunda part. I had difficulties in finding the documents, since the links were not updated in the Dashboard. Only the user-guide link was there. Then I found the admin link from the user-guide. I have not yet found a link to test document. Is there actually one yet? Anyways, my (minor) comments are in the review document. -j On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Toni Alatalo wrote: > Hi again, > > I know the idea in the reviews is to discuss directly with authors & > reviewers, but as the orphan AR review was discussed in the meeting and > here earlier figured that it?s best to inform that I now had the time and > completed the review of it too. It?s largely ok, only missing something in > the installation guide to verify the installation (for example by opening > one of the tests or so? i added a note in the review gdoc that created). > > Also our edits for the 3DUI-WebTundra docs are finished for now ? were > otherwise completed on Friday already (when Jarkko was planning to review) > but I now added info about tests too. The tests are largely not implemented > yet (nor the whole glTF-supporting asset pipeline feature) but I went with > the idea that we are now documenting the January release and documented > tests for the the work-in-progress & planned feats. > > I?ll post separately a before-christmas update on the entity system work & > state of synchronization-3dui integration still, but this now just as a > note about review and docs status. > > Cheers, > ~Toni > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-miwi mailing list > Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi > -- Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila VP, Technology Cyberlightning Ltd. mobile. +358 405245142 email. jarkko at cyberlightning.com Go to www.cybersli.de and enrich your presentations! www.cyberlightning.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From toni at playsign.net Sun Dec 22 09:42:01 2013 From: toni at playsign.net (Toni Alatalo) Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2013 10:42:01 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-miwi] doc reviews: did AR review, finished edits for 3DUI-WebTundra parts In-Reply-To: References: <97934C0A-A431-4A43-93B2-4E889A2AF146@playsign.net> Message-ID: <4807D3BF-29BC-4696-B2CC-FF37A69A3407@playsign.net> Hm for me all the links were correct except the link to the test doc was wrong in the google doc, I corrected that now. In the private integration wiki page they were all correctly already, https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/WP13_Integration .. perhaps you checked earlier or it was cached or something ? anyhow thanks for info and the reviews, I?ll probably have a chance to improve the docs today still (those minor but important points you suggest). ~Toni On 22 Dec 2013, at 10:35, Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila wrote: > As a continuance, I wrote a few brief notes about the WebTunda part. I had difficulties in finding the documents, since the links were not updated in the Dashboard. Only the user-guide link was there. Then I found the admin link from the user-guide. I have not yet found a link to test document. Is there actually one yet? > > Anyways, my (minor) comments are in the review document. > > -j > > > On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Toni Alatalo wrote: > Hi again, > > I know the idea in the reviews is to discuss directly with authors & reviewers, but as the orphan AR review was discussed in the meeting and here earlier figured that it?s best to inform that I now had the time and completed the review of it too. It?s largely ok, only missing something in the installation guide to verify the installation (for example by opening one of the tests or so? i added a note in the review gdoc that created). > > Also our edits for the 3DUI-WebTundra docs are finished for now ? were otherwise completed on Friday already (when Jarkko was planning to review) but I now added info about tests too. The tests are largely not implemented yet (nor the whole glTF-supporting asset pipeline feature) but I went with the idea that we are now documenting the January release and documented tests for the the work-in-progress & planned feats. > > I?ll post separately a before-christmas update on the entity system work & state of synchronization-3dui integration still, but this now just as a note about review and docs status. > > Cheers, > ~Toni > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-miwi mailing list > Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi > > > > -- > Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila > VP, Technology > Cyberlightning Ltd. > > mobile. +358 405245142 > email. jarkko at cyberlightning.com > > Go to www.cybersli.de and enrich your presentations! > > www.cyberlightning.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From toni at playsign.net Sun Dec 22 10:25:45 2013 From: toni at playsign.net (Toni Alatalo) Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2013 11:25:45 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-miwi] EntSys: has Scene, integrates Networking & 3DUI + possibilities for XML3D Message-ID: About 3 weeks ago we presented a plan for an implementation of the entity system and how it would integrate networking (Synch GE) and rendering (3DUI GE). A key aspect in the design was to separate data and view parts of the EC implementations ? unlike in any previous Tundra implementation, where the scene internals and all EC implementations have been directly tied to certain graphics renderer (Ogre or Three.js). The motivation here was to support ?headless clients? or ?simulation servers? ? for example for a Node.js server side service running some simulation or AI code to use this library to connect to a Tundra server to manipulate the scene (possibly what the SceneAPI Epic is after). Without ugly hacks like the !headless checks in many parts of the C++ Tundra code. When the renderer-dependent view code is a separate optional module the scene & network parts can be used also without it but the programming model (against the scene with the entities) is always the same. Consequently, the proposal in this plan was to *not* use the DOM as the internal data storage for the Scene ? simply because there is no (native) DOM implementation available e.g. in the Node.js environment. The original post with more explanations is https://lists.fi-ware.eu/private/fiware-miwi/2013-November/000330.html No one objected, so we went with the plan and I?m very happy to tell that the basics for it are implemented and work now. As planned in that post, we (Ludocraft & Playsign so far) moved to work in a common repository based on Lasse?s Synchronization GE work ? WebTundraNetworking was renamed to WebTundra and we added a view/ directory there: https://github.com/realXtend/WebTundra To see it in action you'll need a recent development build of Tundra WebSocketServer plugin enabled. realXtend will make an official release in January so it will become readily available then. And perhaps we can run Tundra servers in FI-LAB at some point to be able to host web services then. But if you build it yourself, it?s very easy to test with the web-hosted test scene we provide: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/3DUI-WebTundra_-_Installation_and_Administration_Guide#Test_with_provided_web_hosting_for_scene_data To test the tech and verify and improve the application programming model etc. we?ve ported the Pong example on top of Tundra (server-side js) and WebTundra (browser client-side) ? more info about that later separately, but if someone wants a pre-peek that work is in https://github.com/playsign/PongThreeJS/tree/ec (includes server/ dir for the Tundra scene). The Pong example is used also in the dev guide docs in https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/3DUI-WebTundra_-_User_and_Programmers_Guide (to be improved but has basics now). With this some things are clear: we already have a platform on which can develop apps. But all FI-WARE goals are not delivered yet and there are some options so I?ll describe the status briefly here: XML3D Support: in the F2F I promised we?ll do 3 things: 1. the entity system integration (done as reported here now), 2. recommended asset pipeline research & impl (on-going, now waiting for the updated three.js glTF loader by mr. Parisi) and finally 3. a proposal how to proceed with the rendering choice / alternatives. The current WebTundra implementation gives two, I find quite nice, alternatives for XML3D support: a) add XML3D parsing to WebTundra so that it can read XML3D declarations and populate the internal Scene correspondingly, hence resulting in a 3d rendering when the view module is enabled. Erno actually implemented a first version of this this week. It was made by changing the pre-existing WebTundra TXML parser in Toni Dahl?s Chiru-WebClient to read XML3D instead, this work is in https://github.com/playsign/WebTundraNetworking/commits/sceneparser . I find this approach has interesting upsides: is simple, and thanks to the entity-system is transparent to the other parts ? for example the networking works normally so that in fact this works as a way to populate a Tundra server from XML3D (when the client reads xml3d and creates the entities, they get replicated to the server too :) . Also for XML3D standardization efforts it can be interesting that there is another implementation of it. Obvious downsides are that it?s a small incomplete subset of the spec (at least now) and it doesn?t use the xml3d.js engine which has xflow support with hw acceleration coming etc. b) add XML3D.js view module to WebTundra. Now that the core scene and ECs are renderer independent, it is easy and totally feasible to add a xml3d.js renderer. The ThreeView is currently just one file with not an awful lot of code ? same with XML3D.js would probably be as simple. This is helped by Erno having applied the MVC pattern in the code so that besides the data in the scene there are model and controller codes which manage the state and observe data coming in from the net and track Placeable and Mesh references and dependencies etc. so that the View is told to display things when they are ready (instead of the view requiring all that tracking in itself). So with the complexities in Model & Controller parts, possibly already in a renderer agnostic way (we didn?t check with this in mind), possibly not so much is left for the potential alternative Views to handle. We currently need the Three.js view in any case as e.g. Meshmoon has a lot of components & rendering made with three so at least first the XML3D.js view would be an alternative only. Another topic is the DOM integration. Current WebTundra has none. There again I think there are two ways: 1. The previously discussed ?DOM as UI? idea where the internal Scene is just mirrored to DOM (this is simple and Jonne already did it in WebRocket). This might also be one way to implement xml3d.js view support .. if we just populate the DOM it should show when xml3d.js is active (but when using ThreeView the DOM population would be only for developer purposes, to allow seeing the values in debugger etc). 2. Change the scene internals so that it would use the DOM directly. Erno actually prototyped this before we decided to not require DOM in the core to support the node.js case. I don?t know if the scene core could somehow sensibly use the DOM when it?s there, but work without it when it?s not (except ofc with the simply optional mirroring option of 1.). Perhaps somehow doing what Philipp outlined at the F2F, put own JS objects to the DOM nodes (so we could have the Attribute objects with the type info that the net sync (& interface designer) require there). Anyhow, this is where we are now ? I?m very happy that the basics work and we have a common base on which can work and where to integrate things (e.g. 2D UI, Input, Interface Designer, possibly app specific components from other GEs like POI & real-virtual interaction or GIS?) and on which we can implement apps like the Pong example illustrates. The XML3D support and DOM integration we can have at least with the a) and 1) options that have already been implemented. We are however open to discuss alternatives and possible clever techniques to address those. Thanks to everyone for the efforts so far! Looking forward to tackling the last remaining issues & packaging first releases after the holidays then.. ~Toni -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jarkko at cyberlightning.com Sun Dec 22 12:20:21 2013 From: jarkko at cyberlightning.com (Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila) Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2013 13:20:21 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-miwi] doc reviews: did AR review, finished edits for 3DUI-WebTundra parts In-Reply-To: <4807D3BF-29BC-4696-B2CC-FF37A69A3407@playsign.net> References: <97934C0A-A431-4A43-93B2-4E889A2AF146@playsign.net> <4807D3BF-29BC-4696-B2CC-FF37A69A3407@playsign.net> Message-ID: Indeed, maybe some caching issue. Now I see the documents, and updated the review document for unit testing as well. On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Toni Alatalo wrote: > Hm for me all the links were correct except the link to the test doc was > wrong in the google doc, I corrected that now. In the private integration > wiki page they were all correctly already, > https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/WP13_Integration .. > perhaps you checked earlier or it was cached or something > > ? anyhow thanks for info and the reviews, I?ll probably have a chance to > improve the docs today still (those minor but important points you suggest). > > ~Toni > > On 22 Dec 2013, at 10:35, Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila > wrote: > > As a continuance, I wrote a few brief notes about the WebTunda part. I had > difficulties in finding the documents, since the links were not updated in > the Dashboard. Only the user-guide link was there. Then I found the admin > link from the user-guide. I have not yet found a link to test document. Is > there actually one yet? > > Anyways, my (minor) comments are in the review document. > > -j > > > On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Toni Alatalo wrote: > >> Hi again, >> >> I know the idea in the reviews is to discuss directly with authors & >> reviewers, but as the orphan AR review was discussed in the meeting and >> here earlier figured that it?s best to inform that I now had the time and >> completed the review of it too. It?s largely ok, only missing something in >> the installation guide to verify the installation (for example by opening >> one of the tests or so? i added a note in the review gdoc that created). >> >> Also our edits for the 3DUI-WebTundra docs are finished for now ? were >> otherwise completed on Friday already (when Jarkko was planning to review) >> but I now added info about tests too. The tests are largely not implemented >> yet (nor the whole glTF-supporting asset pipeline feature) but I went with >> the idea that we are now documenting the January release and documented >> tests for the the work-in-progress & planned feats. >> >> I?ll post separately a before-christmas update on the entity system work >> & state of synchronization-3dui integration still, but this now just as a >> note about review and docs status. >> >> Cheers, >> ~Toni >> _______________________________________________ >> Fiware-miwi mailing list >> Fiware-miwi at lists.fi-ware.eu >> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-miwi >> > > > > -- > Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila > VP, Technology > Cyberlightning Ltd. > > mobile. +358 405245142 > email. jarkko at cyberlightning.com > > Go to www.cybersli.de and enrich your presentations! > > www.cyberlightning.com > > > -- Jarkko Vatjus-Anttila VP, Technology Cyberlightning Ltd. mobile. +358 405245142 email. jarkko at cyberlightning.com Go to www.cybersli.de and enrich your presentations! www.cyberlightning.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lasse.oorni at ludocraft.com Mon Dec 23 18:32:04 2013 From: lasse.oorni at ludocraft.com (=?iso-8859-1?Q?=22Lasse_=D6=F6rni=22?=) Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 19:32:04 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-miwi] doc reviews: did AR review, finished edits for 3DUI-WebTundra parts In-Reply-To: References: <97934C0A-A431-4A43-93B2-4E889A2AF146@playsign.net> <4807D3BF-29BC-4696-B2CC-FF37A69A3407@playsign.net> Message-ID: <05eace015f0ce182d242affae25ac305.squirrel@urho.ludocraft.com> Hi, it seems Jonne has not reviewed the Synchronization documents. If someone wants to do a quick check I'd be glad. However note that I'm on holiday so I won't have time for extensive edits but I can check the cockpit & email late Wednesday / early Thursday. And of course, Merry Christmas to everyone! -- Lasse ??rni Game Programmer LudoCraft Ltd. From antti.kokko at adminotech.com Mon Dec 30 11:12:34 2013 From: antti.kokko at adminotech.com (Antti Kokko) Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 12:12:34 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-miwi] 2D-UI and Interface Designer Review comments fixed Message-ID: Hello, Just to let you know the 2D-UI and Interface Designer GE Guides and Testing plan documents have been changed according to the reviewer reports. Best, - Antti Kokko / Adminotech -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: