Dear Tobias, Please find comments inline. El 04/12/2013 10:52, Tobias Jacobs escribió: Hi Fermin, Please find my answers inline below. Best Tobias From: fiware-ngsi-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu<mailto:fiware-ngsi-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu> [mailto:fiware-ngsi-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Fermín Galán Márquez Sent: Mittwoch, 4. Dezember 2013 10:40 To: fiware-ngsi at lists.fi-ware.eu<mailto:fiware-ngsi at lists.fi-ware.eu> Subject: Re: [Fiware-ngsi] NGSI binding 1st 'official' version Dear Tobias, Regarding 1, 2, 3 we (TID) agree only in the following case: * The modificion described in https://lists.fi-ware.eu/private/fiware-ngsi/2013-November/000507.html is included in the NGSI10 binding document (after last discussions in fiware-ngsi list, I think there is consensus on this, but I would like to explicitly check it). TJ: Fine for us. * The XSD is included as part of these document (probably you meant that, but there is no item in the document list cited as "XSD"). TJ: Yes, this is what I means by point 3). What makes me think: how about also releasing the XML example documents? [FGM1] As far as we check that every XML that we publicly release conforms with the public XSD we release, I think it would be a good idea. Regarding 5, do you mean the list in Section 2 in the wiki page at https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/NGSI_change_proposals? TJ: Yes. [FGM2] Probably we need some time to "groom" that material (e.g. from proposal 10 to 17 we didn't get any feedback, probably you haven't had time to review, we need to adjust the wording of some of them, etc.). I would suggest to defer to a next public release, to not blocking the current one. Regarding 4, what document do you refer to? TJ: This one: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/OMA_NGSI_Association_concept [FGM3] Associations haven't extensively tested so far, so not sure if it is a good idea to release this document publicly until we can work more intensively on that. However, if you (as main authors of the document :) feel that the document is mature enough to be exposed to the public, it is fine with us. In that case, I would suggest to add a remark in the introduction explaining the situation to readers (i.e. that this is "beta" feature that we haven't tested extensively yet in our software). Thanks! Best regards, ------ Fermín El 04/12/2013 10:20, Tobias Jacobs escribió: Hi all, We discussed today in IoT WP that we should make a first 'official' release of the FI-WARE NGSI binding by the end of next week. In my opinion we could release this as a package of multiple documents: 1) The binding of NGSI 9 2) The binding of NGSI 10 3) The xml documents 4) A document on the ngsi association concept 5) A document describing the changes/clarifications we agreed on for the abstract interface definitions of NGSI. Any opinions on this? Best regards Tobias Thanks! Best regards, ------ Fermín ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace situado más abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-ngsi/attachments/20131204/011c1d9d/attachment.html>
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy