[Fiware-ngsi] [Fiware-iot] IoT F2F NGSI session APs assigned to Fermín have been completed

[Tobias Jacobs]

Hi Fermin and all,

Most of our APs are in connection with the association concept, where we are working out the detail of the new proposal. I put some comments into the minutes accordingly. We try to get as far as possible with it before Easter, so that it can already be reflected in the architecture deliverable.

Salvatore is currently taking care of the xpath --sql issue.

Best
Tobias

-----Original Message-----
From: fiware-iot-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-iot-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Fermín Galán Márquez
Sent: Freitag, 22. März 2013 09:00
To: fiware-iot at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-ngsi at lists.fi-ware.eu
Subject: [Fiware-iot] IoT F2F NGSI session APs assigned to Fermín have been completed

Hi,

All the APs assigned to me during the NGSI session at IoT F2F (see
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1psu0zowp5p2HwDi5arTM-QeSm2r7siBjGb7XLOTnAO4/edit)
have been completed.

@Tobias, Salvatore: what about your APs? How are they progressing?

After re-structuring the page (see last of my APs) I have changed the name to the page to https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/NGSI_change_proposals,
given that now it includes not only proposed changes to OMA NGSI9/10 but also 2 sections for proposed changes in the RESTfull binding and a "dictionary" of metadata used in FI-WARE (empty, by the moment, but if you are using currently some metadata type I encourage you to include it in the wiki). Don't worry: the last URL is automatically redirected to the new one by the wiki server, you don't need to update any bookmark :)

Note the new field "Status" in each proposal. Currently, all proposals have this field set to "under discussion" but this would change as the proposal evolves along a potential approval process (e.g. "under ballot", "approved", etc.). We were discussing about this process in the F2F and in fact a short draft is included in the minutes but, in my opinion, we need a more detailed proposal and a wider consensus on procedure. Not sure what is the tool at project level (FI-WARE) to achieve this...

Best regards,

------
Fermín

________________________________

Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace situado más abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
_______________________________________________
Fiware-iot mailing list
Fiware-iot at lists.fi-ware.eu
https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-iot