[Fiware-oasc-etsi] Very final review of ToR to be submitted to ETSI for consideration

[Mulligan, Catherine E A]

Looks fine for me and 100 Euros is appropriate.

All the best,
Cathy

From: <fiware-oasc-etsi-bounces at lists.fiware.org<mailto:fiware-oasc-etsi-bounces at lists.fiware.org>> on behalf of Juanjo Hierro <juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com<mailto:juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com>>
Date: Tuesday, 7 June 2016 at 05:54
To: "Fiware-oasc-etsi at lists.fiware.org<mailto:Fiware-oasc-etsi at lists.fiware.org>" <Fiware-oasc-etsi at lists.fiware.org<mailto:Fiware-oasc-etsi at lists.fiware.org>>
Subject: [Fiware-oasc-etsi] Very final review of ToR to be submitted to ETSI for consideration


Dear all,

  Please find enclosed a draft that I would consider ready for submission to ETSI.

  Compared to the version previously circulated, I have added some changes on section 3.1 describing the scope of activities in order to capture some points as per requests by ETSI in previous conversations:

  *   Distinguishing between the the Context Information Management API specification to be produced as result of the ISG and the FIWARE NGSI API specification that will be taken as starting point for the specification.
  *   Clarifying relationship between FIWARE NGSI API specifications and OMA NGSI interface specifications, mentioning the eventual contribution back to OMA (not mandatory)
  *   Clarifying that development of an open source reference implementation of both the API and the data publication platform (e.g., CKAN) is not subject "per se" of the work of this ISG but just an instrument to follow an implementation-driven approach.   Multiple alternative implementations (open source or not) will be allowed/feasible.

  We have discussed these issues multiple times and I believe we are very much on the same page so I don't foresee any issue but please double-check.

  I understand that there were no comments on changes we incorporated in the last version regarding clarification on the relationship betwee the scope of our work and that in OneM2M (section 5).   This was the more delicate point.

  I double-check the issue raised by Cathy regarding payment of fees to attend meetings by observers and non-members of ETSI and I found that the text was there and hadn't been deleted!   Please check sections 3.3 "Dues" and 3.6.1 "Participation in the work of the Industry Specification Group (clarification of TWP 3.4)".   I have just proposed a fee of 100€ (before specified as "XXX").

  I have also added the reference to non-members of ETSI supporting the creation of this ETSI ISG.   This was suggested by ETSI.  If you know about any other entity we may add, please let me know.   I understand that Futures Cities Catapult UK is ETSI member and would endorse the creation of the ETSI ISG as well as iMinds

  Last but not least, ETSI proposed that the EC participates in the ETSI ISG as councilor.   I will ask ETSI to add the wording in the proper section for this purpose, since I don't know where they will expect to see it in the document.   This should make things easier.

  I would like to submit the document tomorrow EoB at the latest.   Therefore, please send your comments before tomorrow noon.   Please try to propose any comment through concrete change requests using the changes tracking mechanism of MS Word.

  Best regards,


-- Juanjo

______________________________________________________

Coordinator and Chief Architect, FIWARE platform
IoT Unit, Telefónica

email: juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com<mailto:juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com>
twitter: @JuanjoHierro

You can follow FIWARE at:
  website:  http://www.fiware.org
  twitter:  @FIWARE
  facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242
  linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932

________________________________

Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilización, divulgación y/o copia sin autorización puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislación vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción.

The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete it.

Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinatário, pode conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial e é para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se não é vossa senhoria o destinatário indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utilização, divulgação e/ou cópia sem autorização pode estar proibida em virtude da legislação vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destruição
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-oasc-etsi/attachments/20160607/bbcf509c/attachment.html>