Dear Cathy, Juanjo, Franck and all, I propose a powerpoint of about 10 pages, covering the points below, and I ask your feedback about how to jointly create it and use it. We need a convincing "launch" presentation if the Board recommends the ISG, to send a "outreach" (positive presentation) towards ETSI, oneM2M, SmartM2M members to engage their interest and to avoid that they assume we are trampling on their topics. If the Board should _not_ recommend the ISG, then we even more need a positive presentation to convince them. Therefore, what do you think of this outline? _______Contents of CIM ISG Launch Presentation_________ ) key message - smart cities and applicatiions with IoT need to be developed/trialed/evolved asap ... urgent! - (a) no re-inventing the wheel! (b) interoperability with oneM2M is targeted (c) open and public - a few organisations see the need for immediate action, and have the commitment ) importance of the topic (CIM for Smart Cities) - smart cities are key ROI for IoT, cities are centres of living and production - traffic, pollution, parking, water, power (efficiency), crime ... all cry out for efficient IoT solutions - eGov and IoT can release many resources/data for synergy with new business and quality of life - IoT is the fundamental requirement, BUT most of the synergies between systems rely on Context Info - there is no common agreement for how to exchange context information ) desired outputs - survey of "who has done what, where is development ongoing, where can liaisons be effective" - data models: common vocabulary and/or agreed mappings between many verticals and also between many spoken languages with different words for same "entities" - API to allow _exchange_ of context information - promote external open-source implementations and proof-of-principle ) who should contribute? - in a world with hundreds of IoT fora, many organisations are already overworked, so need to make a short-term and focused approach .... "open ended" will not be attractive! - who? o smart cities are the "users" for the initial use cases, so need to gather together their inputs! § OASC are first target o application developers and system integrators with strong need for results § FIWARE Community are first target ) why is an ISG the right approach - low threshold to entry for smart cities - initial ideas do not face barrier of huge "learning curve" for existing SDO documents - provides a consolidated input, from many sources, towards other SDOs - outputs are specifications NOT standards: allows "try and see" without promising that the results will be adopted by a European Standards Organisation or a global SDO. - An ISG can be focused more on the European viewpoint, without promising to cover also all Americas or Asian viewpoints for smart cities. This is a limitation which might also help get some success in a restricted context before expanding globally. ) next steps, (your) participation, collaborations/liaisons - open to any ETSI member and non-ETSI participants - outputs will be public, liaisons as frequently as results are available - most urgent: provide tips and info for the initial survey of organisations/specifications o initial obvious list (org and WG): ITU-T SG20, oneM2M WG5, .... Thanks for your feedback Lindsay ________________________________________ Dr. Lindsay Frost, Chief Standardization Eng. frost at neclab.eu<mailto:frost at neclab.eu> Mobile +49.163.275.1734 NEC Laboratories Europe, Kurfürsten-Anlage 36, D-69115 Heidelberg, Germany. Reg. Headoffice: NEC Europe Ltd, VAT DE161569151 Athene, Odyssey Business Park, West End Road, London HA4 6QE, Reg. in England 2832014 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-oasc-etsi/attachments/20160909/f3b852a4/attachment.html>
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy