[Fiware-oasc-etsi] CIM ISG ToR proposal - results from pre-consultation

[Lindsay Frost]

Dear Juanjo, I have filled in the http://doodle.com/poll/hfcfd4ncybxdgg4e

however it is for Tuesday/Wedndesday/Thursday _next_ week.

Do you still continue planning a call with Hermann on Thursday this week (tomorrow)?



/Lindsay

________________________________________
Dr. Lindsay Frost, Chief Standardization Eng.
frost at neclab.eu<mailto:frost at neclab.eu>     Mobile +49.163.275.1734
NEC Laboratories Europe, Kurfürsten-Anlage 36,
D-69115 Heidelberg, Germany.

Reg. Headoffice: NEC Europe Ltd, VAT DE161569151
Athene, Odyssey Business Park, West End Road,
London HA4 6QE, Reg. in England 2832014

From: Juanjo Hierro [mailto:juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com]
Sent: Mittwoch, 21. September 2016 00:57
To: Hermann Brand; Lindsay Frost; Mulligan, Catherine E A; David Boswarthick; Patrick Guillemin
Cc: Fiware-oasc-etsi at lists.fiware.org; Enrico Scarrone_Internet; Elloumi, Omar (Nokia - FR)
Subject: Re: [Fiware-oasc-etsi] CIM ISG ToR proposal - results from pre-consultation


Dear Hermann, Omar, Enrico,

  Can you share the referred detailed comments?

  I believe it is hard to agree on a face to face meeting, so please setup a doodle for a GoToMeeting (if you can provide a bridge).

  I have setup the following doodle for finding a timeslot that can be suitable for all:

http://doodle.com/poll/hfcfd4ncybxdgg4e

(Selecting a time means you agree to have a confcall that starts at that time and last two hours.  All times are CET)

  After 5 months and several meetings (I remember the one we had in Rome), all this comes as a rather big surprise to me.   Frustrating.

  Best regards,

-- Juanjo

On 20/09/16 23:44, Hermann Brand wrote:
Dear all,

We have received detailed comments from Enrico and  Omar representing ETSI SmartM2M and oneM2M. Thank you Enrico and Omar for your analysis and forward-looking proposals.

They recognize that some ambitions driving the proposed ISG CIM work are close to those in smartM2M (SAREF) and also in oneM2M Rel-2, but attempt to envisage a win-win-win-win scenario for ISG CIM, SmartM2M, oneM2M and indeed the European Commission. Their proposal could be taken into consideration by making some modifications in the scope section of the ISG CIM proposal.

We do believe that it is important to share the views first, to see whether these ideas are acceptable from the FIWARE point of view. It would then be quite straight forward to reword some parts of the scope section.


An email discussion is not the best tool to serve this purpose and we believe that a meeting would be needed.

Would you be available for a meeting, ideally face-to-face, at least by conference call/ goToMeeting?

If so would you please indicate who would be involved and their availabilities?

Best regards,
Hermann
PS: Should be a separate meeting/call. Can’t all be dealt with on Thursday, 10h CEST

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-oasc-etsi/attachments/20160921/82943e56/attachment.html>