[oasc-iot-lsp-cities] Section 2.1 update + 2.2

[Ana Garcia]

Status on section 2.2:

- Nuria and Sebastien please lets work in a strong introductory part as
discussed I put the key words discussed today (half a page) INPUT IN
already, I need to harmonise it

- Exploitation strategy (Nuria, half a page) DONE

- Dissemination plan, actions and measures (Ana, 1 page) In progress

- Impact through standardisation (Sebastien, Juanjo, 1/2 page) DONE

- Knowledge management and IPR (Nadia/Adrienne, 1/2 based on
Organicity) Nothing
IN so far

- Data management plan (not clear to me who was going to write this but
Alex/Remco/Sergio/Juanjo mentioned in the call) (1/2 page) Some text in/DONE

- Communication (Ana, 1 page) DONE


A more consolidated version will be ready tonight and I will inform of
status then


Best,

Best,
Ana García
Director

*ENoLL ivzw | Pleinlaan 9** | 1050 Brussels | Belgium
| www.openlivinglabs.eu <http://www.openlivinglabs.eu/>*

*T:  | F: +32 2 629 16 13 | M: +32 470 19 3118 *

*@openlivinglabs **| @RoblesAG*



On 9 April 2016 at 12:53, Mirko Presser <mirko.presser at alexandra.dk> wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> Here is a section 2.1 update.
>
> LUIS will look at the 2.1.1 points 4-9.
>
> Any VOLUNTEERS to look through 1-3?
>
> I am expecting inputs from MARGARIDA for the KPIs – she will collect this
> form the cities.
>
> I need the Mexican City description. SERGIO
>
> I need ATOS - NURIA, TELEFONICA - SERGIO, PHILIPS - REMCO, ENGINEERING -
> STEPHANO to look at 2.1.2.10 and shorten to 1-2 pages. Each company gets
> 1/3 page max.
>
> MIRKO to write an intro to 2.1.2 based on the moved figure (Arup Table)
> which sits now in section 1.
>
> We have 9 cities (including the Mexican city) - this means that with 1
> page per city we spend 50% on that. Most of the content is boasting how
> great the cities already are. We don’t need that in this section – that can
> be in section 4 – what we need is how SynchroiCity will help you propel you
> even further into becoming an even greater city. So – EACH CITY should
> revise their inputs to focus on IMPACT and not how great they are. 2/3
> pages per city is max.
>
> Any VOLUNTEERS to check barriers and obstacles 2.1.3? - shorten to 1.5
> pages
>
> SERGIO – I need that standards table 2.1.4.
>
> I have deleted the section on other societal impact that Pentti made
> based on PEST – it was too generic.
>
> MARTIN – please give me a first draft for 2.1.5 Quantifiable Impact of
> the Project form a project perspective – cities will be coming in from
> MARGARIDA’s work.
>
> Ana – could you give a status on 2.2?
>
> Finally we have a page limit problem. We need to cut this down to 20
> pages. Including 2.2! So we are not looking for volume.
>
> Thanks
>
> Mirko
>
> *____________________________________________*
> *MIRKO PRESSER*
> *INTERNET OF THINGS EXPERT AND TEAM LEADER*
> DATA SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING LAB
>
> ALEXANDRA INSTITUTTET A/S
> ÅBOGADE 34, 8200 AARHUS N
> KONTOR: HOPPER-333
>
> + 45 30 49 09 76
> mirko.presser at alexandra.dk <fornavn.efternavn at alexandra.dk>
> alexandra.dk <http://www.alexandra.dk/>
> linkedin.com/in/mirkopresser
> twitter.com/mirkopresser
> *____________________________________________*
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fiware-oasc-iot-lsp-cities mailing list
> Fiware-oasc-iot-lsp-cities at lists.fiware.org
> https://lists.fiware.org/listinfo/fiware-oasc-iot-lsp-cities
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-oasc-iot-lsp-cities/attachments/20160409/a552e162/attachment.html>