[Fiware-pcc] LoS - Cont.

[JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO]

Yes. I see no problem.

Thank you Yaron

I also attach Alcatel letter. Do you agree?. If I receive no contrary replay I shall sign it as well. I personally think Alcatel letter is very vague, but I think we may as well sign it since it shows our commitment to Fire which may be useful and important

Open to suggestions anyway

BR


----

Jose Jimenez
Telefonica  I+D
jimenez at tid.es
tf +34 91 4832660


De: Yaron Wolfsthal [mailto:WOLFSTAL at il.ibm.com]
Enviado el: domingo, 18 de diciembre de 2011 14:57
Para: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO
Asunto: Fw: [Fiware-pcc] LoS - Cont.

Dear Jose

Based on Stefano's attached email -- may I understand that FI-Ware agrees to provide the requested LoS to CloudWave?

Should I provide the PCC with a proposed draft?

Thanks
yaron


----- Forwarded by Yaron Wolfsthal/Haifa/IBM on 18/12/2011 03:56 PM -----

From:        stefano de panfilis <stefano.depanfilis at eng.it>
To:        Yaron Wolfsthal/Haifa/IBM at IBMIL
Cc:        fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu
Date:        15/12/2011 05:22 PM
Subject:        Re: [Fiware-pcc] LoS - Cont.
Sent by:        ste.depanfilis at gmail.com
________________________________



dear yaron,

many thanks,
the statement, very concrete, is was exactly what i was meaning and
looking for in the discussion of yesterday.

based on this my complete and convinced green ligth to the supporting
letter from fi-ware.

good luck my friend!
stefano

2011/12/15 Yaron Wolfsthal <WOLFSTAL at il.ibm.com>:
> Dear all
> I today had discussion with the CloudWave stake holders, and shared the
> sentiment the PCC w.r.t. the letter of support.
>
> The following statement represents the consortium's view
>
> "The CloudWave consortium aims to maintain a FI-WARE compatible architecture
> and to extend FI-WARE ecosystem, by reusing some of the GE implementations
> and potentially contributing back extended versions of those GE".
> This can go in the CloudWave proposal, chapter 3 (impact, specifically the
> subsection on collaboration with other bodies).
> Note it addresses the important point of FI-Ware exploitation.
>
> All, I felt this is a good input to the LoS discussion, and of course will
> let the entire pcc make a decision, based on this information and and other
> relevant considerations.
>
> Thanks
> Yaron
> _______________________________________________
> Fiware-pcc mailing list
> Fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu
> http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-pcc
>



--
Stefano De Panfilis
Chief Innovation Officer
Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A.
via Riccardo Morandi 32
00148 Roma
Italy

tel (direct): +39-068307-4295
tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513
fax: +39-068307-4200
cell: +39-335-7542-567

________________________________
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at.
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-pcc/attachments/20111219/01a90444/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: FI-WARE  - FIRE_LIMITS- LoS 16-dic.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 16459 bytes
Desc: FI-WARE  - FIRE_LIMITS- LoS 16-dic.docx
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-pcc/attachments/20111219/01a90444/attachment.docx>