From jhierro at tid.es Fri Jul 1 06:24:11 2011 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 06:24:11 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] IMPORTANT Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: CVs of suggested reviewers Message-ID: <4E0D4BEB.9000709@tid.es> Dear all, As you will see reading the attached emails (in reverse order), I mentioned to the EC that several of the partners had some concerns with Mrs Li being a reviewer for our project. I didn't say that we wanted definitively to object about her but not decide yet about her candidature (reviewers can be added later on, as explained by Arian). I also mentioned that if they need to start with a minimum of three reviewers, we would propose Mike Fisher (BT) as candidate. Several of you had proposed Mike and indeed I believe he would be an excellent reviewer. The obvious reaction was that they asked what are the concerns about Mrs Li that we have. I would kindly ask those that provided me with that feedback to send me some rationale about their concerns about Mrs Li so that I can reply to the EC. Of course, those others that believe it is recommendable to go for another reviewed are also welcome to send me their feedback. Please note that selection of reviewers is a very crucial point. We should take it very seriously because it will influence very much some aspects of the project. Regarding good reviewers candidates, don't hesitate to send me any proposal if you haven't already do so. Best regards, -- Juanjo -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: FI-WARE: CVs of suggested reviewers Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:54:26 +0200 From: Annalisa.Bogliolo at ec.europa.eu To: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA CC: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu , JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO Dear Juanjo, w-could you please explain me better which are the "concerns" about Mrs Li? As far as I know, she is knowledgeable and experienced in the Future of Internet themes, even if not from a strictly technical point of view, which is useful in a review. Mike Fisher is an excellent reviewer as well, but he's profile is quite different from the one of Mrs Li and thus it is difficult to see how he could replace her. In my opinion he could eventually complement the team, even though I would wait for Arian to be back before committing. In the meanwhile, could you please tell me about the concerns, as if they are serious and based on facts then we will have to examine them more closely. Best regards Annalisa ________________________________ From: Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2011 6:34 AM To: BOGLIOLO Annalisa (INFSO) Cc: ZWEGERS Arian (INFSO); Jose Jimenez; jhierro >> "Juan J. Hierro" Subject: Re: FI-WARE: CVs of suggested reviewers Hi Annalisa, Some partners have expressed concerns regarding selection of Mrs Man-Sze Li as reviewer. Several partners have also proposed Mike Fisher (who I guess you know well) as reviewer. I would consider him a good choice myself. Definitively, he combines an industrial and research perspective and good knowledge of some of the topics covered in FI-WARE. He's also familiar with EU FP projects and is also playing a relevant role at ETSI. He may be an alternative to Man-Sze Li if you have to choose three names at this point. You mentioned that the review team as suggested by Arian can be complemented later on. We can take advantage of that to finally determine if Mrs Man-Sze Li is finally included. Best regards, -- Juanjo On 27/06/11 14:44, Annalisa.Bogliolo at ec.europa.eu wrote: Dear Juanjo I am afraid I have problems to give you more days as I need to close this dossier now as I am going on holiday in a very few days. You wrote me the same one month ago, and now I do not have time any longer to see who it is that you may propose, to contact them, to check if they can be reviewers etc etc. Please note that the review team as suggested by Arian can be complemented later on. So unless you let me know if there is a serious impediment for any of the three proposed reviewers by tonight, tomorrow I have to prepare the contracts, so that they can start reading the deliverables as soon as they are ready and the first is due in four days. I'm sure you do understand the urgency. Best regards Annalisa ________________________________ From: Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] Sent: Monday, June 27, 2011 1:53 PM To: BOGLIOLO Annalisa (INFSO) Cc: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO; TAGLIANI Federica (INFSO); ZWEGERS Arian (INFSO); jhierro >> "Juan J. Hierro" Subject: Re: FI-WARE: CVs of suggested reviewers I would kindly ask you to give us a few more days. We are currently hoding some discussion on alternative candidates. If we finally reach an agreement about those alternatives candidates, we would like to provide their names for your consideration. Best regards, -- Juanjo On 23/06/11 15:01, Annalisa.Bogliolo at ec.europa.eu wrote: Dear Juanjo and Jose I have not heard anything after this mail about the reviewers. I would like to close this chapter before the end of next week as I am going on holiday. If I do not have concrete input by tomorrow (Brussels) lunch time, I will simply confirm Arian's proposal. Best regards Annalisa ________________________________ From: Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 6:02 PM To: ZWEGERS Arian (INFSO) Cc: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO; BOGLIOLO Annalisa (INFSO); TAGLIANI Federica (INFSO); jhierro >> "Juan J. Hierro" Subject: Re: FI-WARE: CVs of suggested reviewers Dear Arian, Annaliza and Federica, Please don't close the reviewers selection first. On one hand, we would like to analyze the candidates you propose carefully. On the other hand, we may come with some candidates you may also agree could be better (not yet identified, but is a point I have asked other partners to think about). We believe that selection of the right reviewers in this project is crucial. Let's keep in touch on the matter. Of course, we should be able to close a decision soon, preferably before end of June. Best regards, -- Juanjo On 23/05/11 21:46, Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu wrote: Dear Jose, Juanjo, As discussed in Budapest, please find enclosed for your approval the CVs of 3 experts that I would like to suggest as FI-WARE reviewers. As mentioned, I would like to come to a way-of-working based on fast feedback / suggestion cycles. This will be largely realised using remote reviews, possibly complemented by phone conferences with some key FI-WARE people, if deemed useful or necessary. In case of remote reviews, feedback will be rather informal. The main (only?) point of attention for the reviewers will be industrial relevance of the project outcomes. I might want to suggest a fourth name with expertise in IoT and software development in a later stage. Best regards, Arian. PS. During my absence, starting now, please send emails to me with Annalisa and Federica in cc. <> <> <> <> ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: jhierro.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 429 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jimenez at tid.es Tue Jul 5 08:50:42 2011 From: jimenez at tid.es (JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO) Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2011 08:50:42 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] Meeting of the Scientific Council In-Reply-To: <0986BE7EB220D848BEF7ADDF53B6341957A3E27904@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> References: <0986BE7EB220D848BEF7ADDF53B6341957A3E277F3@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> <0986BE7EB220D848BEF7ADDF53B6341957A3E1E1A0@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> <0986BE7EB220D848BEF7ADDF53B6341957A3E1E1AB@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> <0986BE7EB220D848BEF7ADDF53B6341957A3E278DC@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> <0986BE7EB220D848BEF7ADDF53B6341957A3E27904@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> Message-ID: <0986BE7EB220D848BEF7ADDF53B6341957A42FF3C5@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> Please do not forget to state your preference. We have still some people who have not voted. BR ---- Jose Jimenez Telefonica I+D jimenez at tid.es tf +34 91 4832660 De: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO Enviado el: mi?rcoles, 22 de junio de 2011 17:51 Para: 'sastry at coe.berkeley.edu'; 'ruilaa at det.ua.pt'; 'Sergio.Bandinelli at esi.es'; 'd.w.chadwick at kent.ac.uk'; 'piet.demeester at intec.ugent.be'; 'j.b.domingue at open.ac.uk'; 'dieter.fensel at sti2.at'; 'llorente at dacya.ucm.es'; 'Michael.Nilsson at cdt.ltu.se'; 'miguelpdl at tssg.org'; 'schotten at eit.uni-kl.de'; 'dora at telecom.ntua.gr' CC: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Asunto: Meeting of the Scientific Council Dear SC and PCC We should be deciding a date for the first meeting of the Scientific Council In principle we have three possibilities 1) Have the meeting 26 of October. This would be collocated with the FIA and will take place in Poznam 2) Have the meeting Nov 2 or Nov 3 in Madrid (it will be 1 day meeting) 3) As a last alternative 20 or 21 October in Madrid ( Will only be considered as a last resort, we prefer the other two options) Please go to the Doodle and state your preference: http://doodle.com/gu3zb2cvqxi3v23t IMPORTANT: do not forget the PCC should also attend this meeting (as explained in the DoW), so also PCC members have to set their preferences Best regards ---- Jose Jimenez Telefonica I+D jimenez at tid.es tf +34 91 4832660 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Wed Jul 6 14:52:06 2011 From: nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu (Nuria De-Lama Sanchez) Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 14:52:06 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] Brief summary of the meeting between INFINITY and the other projects of the FI PPP-29th June, Brussels Message-ID: Dear PCC members, As you probably know, last week INFINITY held a meeting in Brussels to get to know the needs coming from use cases and other projects of the FI PPP with respect to validation, testing and experimentation. I was in Brussels attending the Third usage Area workshop organized by the EX-FI project and I took advantage to attend the INFINITY meeting too. However I could not access the e-mail the night before and did not have the opportunity to get the FIWARE presentation. Fortunately Pepe attended the meeting remotely and made the presentation (I attach the final version). I suppose people from INFINITY will circulate some notes and conclusions (I already asked Federico for this information and will distribute it as soon as I get it; Pepe, if you receive it earlier than me do not hesitate to share it with all of us). In any case, find below some basic information so that you can get an overview of what was discussed there: When: June 29th, 14:00 - 17:00 Where: European Regional Information Society Association 24 Boulevard de l'Empereur 1000 Brussels (Belgium) Agenda: 1. Introductions - from INFINITY and the projects attending, possibly one slide each. (20 mins) 2. FI-PPP / INFINITY Interaction Process (including info on the Concertation Board) - INFINITY will present how it sees the interaction between itself and the projects. We would encourage feedback from the projects here to ensure that the communication channels are clear and open from the outset. (40 mins) 3. Requirements Gathering from the FI-PPP projects 1. Each project presents their expectations on what INFINITY will provide (30 mins - 1 or 2 slides per project) 2. INFINITY presents their current questionnaire that will be used for gathering data from each test infrastructure (30 mins) 3. Open discussion based on input from projects and INFINITY with a goal of refining/extending the INFINITY questionnaire so that the requirements/expectations of the projects are met (1 hour) Discussion: ? The main role of INFINITY (CSA on Capacity Building) is to find and catalog facilities that can be useful for the purpose of validation of Future Internet technologies being they related to use cases or basic technology (like the ones of the core platform). This work will be especially useful in phase 2 and phase 3 of the PPP. ? INFINITY presented the objectives of the project as well as a mock up of the repository. The idea is that owners or responsible people of the facilities fill in the fields of the questionnaires to feed the database. This will not be done by INFINITY, but of course, a process of validation will be encouraged. ? All use cases were requested to provide information on their requirements for validation and testing purposes. First of all this is needed in order to define the right fields to characterize testing facilities, and second, this will be needed to help use cases as much as possible in this respect and filter capacities accordingly ? therefore, the main part of the meeting was devoted to the presentations of the different use cases, CONCORD and FIWARE ? Meetings and interaction will be a must in this process to be coordinated ? one person from INFINITY will give support to each use case project (like that, there will always be someone ready to reply quickly to questions and doubts); there will be another physical meeting after summer. Several options have been discussed even if the decision will be taken later on and informed to all the projects (one possibility could be during the FIA week in Poznan, but this is not clear yet because there already too many things going on there) ? At the end of the meeting there was a discussion on initiatives, projects and programmes that could be of interest, such as the ENoLL and some others (this will be further tackled in future discussions) ? One curious conclusion from the meeting is that, besides technical requirements as such, there were some ideas about requirements at legal, regulatory or privacy level that were raised by some projects. For example, SAFECITY asked for support by INIFNITY to analyze the regulatory situation of different countries in Europe in those aspects that are needed by the projects for large scale trials. As pointed out in the beginning of the e-mail check the presentation of FIWARE to see the initial requirements transmitted by FIWARE to INFINITY. Of course the process is open and this should be updated continuously. Having the first draft of the High Level Description will probably help on this too. Best regards, NURIA Nuria de Lama AtoS Research & Innovation Representative to the European Commission T +34 91214 9321 F +34 91754 3252 nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atosresearch.eu es.atos.net ________________________________ ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 78 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 816 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-WARE input for INFINITY.pptx Type: application/octet-stream Size: 1098420 bytes Desc: FI-WARE input for INFINITY.pptx URL: From jhierro at tid.es Sun Jul 10 15:45:28 2011 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 15:45:28 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] Fwd: [FI-PPP AB] Invitation: ServiceWave 2011 FI PPP Session Message-ID: <4E19ACF8.4040002@tid.es> Hi all, I would like to call your attention about the attached message. I guess it would be worth to contribute with a paper on FI-WARE to the technical FI PPP session that has been planned in the ServiceWave 2011 event. It shouldn't be that difficult once we have produced the FI-WARE High-level Description deliverable. Please let me know what do you think. It seems like we have to respond by July 14, so that I would like to get your replies by email before that date. Then we may discuss how we can plan writing the paper during our confcall on July 14th (I remind you there was a doodle I setup to find out the best timeslot for the confcall in which we will brief you on results of our FI-PPP AB meeting) Best regards, -- Juanjo -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [FI-PPP AB] Invitation: ServiceWave 2011 FI PPP Session Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2011 20:05:31 +0200 From: Metzger, Andreas To: ab at fi-ppp.eu CC: clarissa.marquezan at paluno.uni-due.de Dear FI PPP colleagues, Based on the positive response of many of you, we are happy to announce that ServiceWave 2011 will feature a technical FI PPP session. On behalf of the ServiceWave 2011 General Chair, Klaus Pohl, I cordially invite you to present the first technical outcomes of your project during that session. In addition, we are happy to offer you to write a paper between 2-12 pages which will be published in the ServiceWave 2011 Springer LNCS proceedings (CRC deadline is August, 10). As you can see from the attached flyer, the FI PPP session is scheduled to take place on day 1 of the conference, following the FIA sessions in the morning and preceded by an opening keynote from the EC. After the FI PPP session, there will be the joint FIA/FIRE/ServiceWave demonstration evening, which last time attracted well over 200 participants. We look forward to your positive response and kindly ask you to please confirm your contribution by July, 14, such that we can start advertising. Thus, please also send us the tentative title of your presentation and let us know whether you would like to contribute a paper to the proceedings. Very best regards, Andreas PS: Please apologize multiple receptions of this e-mail. It has been resent, as it did not reach all AB members. -- Dr. Andreas Metzger Research group leader 'Software and Service Quality' Paluno (The Ruhr Institute for Software Technology) * University of Duisburg-Essen Gerlingstra?e 16 * 45127 Essen * Germany * callto:+49-201-183-4650 * fax:+49-201-183-4699 mailto:andreas.metzger at paluno.uni-due.de * http://www.paluno.eu * VAT-Nr. DE811272995 -- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ServiceWave2011_Flyer.pdf Type: application/octet-stream Size: 1599087 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: ATT00001..txt URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: jhierro.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 429 bytes Desc: not available URL: From thomas.michael.bohnert at sap.com Mon Jul 18 16:51:42 2011 From: thomas.michael.bohnert at sap.com (Bohnert, Thomas Michael) Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 16:51:42 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] [Fiware-wpa] Fwd: [FI-PPP AB] Invitation: ServiceWave 2011 FI PPP Session In-Reply-To: <4E19ACF8.4040002@tid.es> References: <4E19ACF8.4040002@tid.es> Message-ID: <771C9B001456D64783596DDC3801C6EA2812EE4003@DEWDFECCR09.wdf.sap.corp> My reply is too late but positive! Thomas From: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juanjo Hierro Sent: Sonntag, 10. Juli 2011 15:45 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpa] Fwd: [FI-PPP AB] Invitation: ServiceWave 2011 FI PPP Session Hi all, I would like to call your attention about the attached message. I guess it would be worth to contribute with a paper on FI-WARE to the technical FI PPP session that has been planned in the ServiceWave 2011 event. It shouldn't be that difficult once we have produced the FI-WARE High-level Description deliverable. Please let me know what do you think. It seems like we have to respond by July 14, so that I would like to get your replies by email before that date. Then we may discuss how we can plan writing the paper during our confcall on July 14th (I remind you there was a doodle I setup to find out the best timeslot for the confcall in which we will brief you on results of our FI-PPP AB meeting) Best regards, -- Juanjo -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [FI-PPP AB] Invitation: ServiceWave 2011 FI PPP Session Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2011 20:05:31 +0200 From: Metzger, Andreas To: ab at fi-ppp.eu CC: clarissa.marquezan at paluno.uni-due.de Dear FI PPP colleagues, Based on the positive response of many of you, we are happy to announce that ServiceWave 2011 will feature a technical FI PPP session. On behalf of the ServiceWave 2011 General Chair, Klaus Pohl, I cordially invite you to present the first technical outcomes of your project during that session. In addition, we are happy to offer you to write a paper between 2-12 pages which will be published in the ServiceWave 2011 Springer LNCS proceedings (CRC deadline is August, 10). As you can see from the attached flyer, the FI PPP session is scheduled to take place on day 1 of the conference, following the FIA sessions in the morning and preceded by an opening keynote from the EC. After the FI PPP session, there will be the joint FIA/FIRE/ServiceWave demonstration evening, which last time attracted well over 200 participants. We look forward to your positive response and kindly ask you to please confirm your contribution by July, 14, such that we can start advertising. Thus, please also send us the tentative title of your presentation and let us know whether you would like to contribute a paper to the proceedings. Very best regards, Andreas PS: Please apologize multiple receptions of this e-mail. It has been resent, as it did not reach all AB members. -- Dr. Andreas Metzger Research group leader 'Software and Service Quality' Paluno (The Ruhr Institute for Software Technology) * University of Duisburg-Essen Gerlingstra?e 16 * 45127 Essen * Germany * callto:+49-201-183-4650 * fax:+49-201-183-4699 mailto:andreas.metzger at paluno.uni-due.de * http://www.paluno.eu * VAT-Nr. DE811272995 -- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From randradas at libresoft.es Thu Jul 28 00:28:39 2011 From: randradas at libresoft.es (Roberto Andradas Izquierdo) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 00:28:39 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] FI-WARE mailing lists are now again operative Message-ID: Dear FI-WARE project members, This mail is to announce you that the FI-WARE mailing lists are now again operative. Nevertheless, we will monitor them tomorrow to make sure there are no incidents with them. Please let us know if you still experience any problem by sending an email to fiware-support at lists.fi-ware.eu Apologize for the inconvenience all this may have caused. Sincerely, The FI-WARE infrastructure support team email: fiware-support at lists.fi-ware.eu