[Fiware-pcc] Intel attendance at FI-WARE Review

[Alex Glikson]

John is a nice guy, so I don't mind if he attends (although I don't think 
his attendance is needed from WP4 perspective).

Regarding the broader question of inviting additional partners to the 
review -- there are pro's and con's (maybe more pro's than con's), but I 
think it is too late now for this review.

Regards,
Alex




From:   "Fasse, Axel" <axel.fasse at sap.com>
To:     Garino Pierangelo <pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it>, 
Cc:     "fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu" <fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu>
Date:   20/11/2012 09:03 AM
Subject:        Re: [Fiware-pcc] Intel attendance at FI-WARE Review
Sent by:        fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu



Dear Pier,
 
from my point of view it would be a good idea if more (all) partners could 
participate in the review meeting.
 
·         We can show commitment
·         Questions of the reviewers could be clarified / discussed 
·         ?
 
But I am not sure if we are re-arrange the rooms for the meeting.
During the last Reviews we have had small rooms.
Beside this, it might be the case that some of the partner will complain 
because of the short-time invitation.
But that?s a minor topic.
 
 
Maybe Telefonica can check and decide this before we give an official 
answer.
 
 
Best regards,
  Axel
 
From: fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [
mailto:fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Garino Pierangelo
Sent: Montag, 19. November 2012 17:01
To: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu
Subject: [Fiware-pcc] I: Intel attendance at FI-WARE Review
 
Dear PCC members, 
I have received the mail below from Intel asking to attend the review 
meeting as further support of the project Team. You might remember that 
personally I'd be in favour of having (all) partners present, but due to 
the size of the project and other considerations this wouldn't be so 
simple.
Can we agree on the answer to be sent to Intel (and to any other partner 
proposing the same)?  I add that due to the partner's impact it might be a 
good thing to involve them.
Thanks an BR 
Pier

Inviato da Samsung Mobile 



-------- Original message --------
Subject: Intel attendance at FI-WARE Review 
From: "Woods, Chris" <chris.woods at intel.com> 
To: Garino Pierangelo <pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it> 
CC: "Kennedy, John M" <john.m.kennedy at intel.com> 

Hi Pier,
 
Intel would like to have a representative at the forthcoming review 
meeting. 
 
John Kennedy has volunteered to be present for the review meeting. Can you 
confirm the following dates and provide more detailed information on the 
review venue?
26-27 November - Rehearsal
28-29 November - Review
Location: Brussels
 
Given the outcome of the previous review we feel that it would be 
important for a member of Intel to be present to provide any support 
required, answering any questions about the work we are involved in, 
current workload, plans for exploitation and dissemination etc. I hope 
these plans will help in the I2ND, Cloud work package and indeed overall 
project reviews.
Many thanks,
Chris
 
 

Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle 
persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante 
dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. 
Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente 
pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla 
sua distruzione, Grazie. 
This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged 
information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, 
printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and 
advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. 
Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non è necessario. 
 _______________________________________________
Fiware-pcc mailing list
Fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu
http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-pcc

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-pcc/attachments/20121120/1074713e/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 677 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-pcc/attachments/20121120/1074713e/attachment.gif>