From jimenez at tid.es Thu Sep 6 09:42:25 2012 From: jimenez at tid.es (JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO) Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 09:42:25 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] PCC meeting Message-ID: <0986BE7EB220D848BEF7ADDF53B634196ABA39B64D@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> Dear all We would like to have a PCC meeting essentially to discuss the comments to the Review and suggest further actions. A simple proposal would be just after the WPL meeting next September 10 at 16.30 CET. Any objections? BR ---- Jose Jimenez Telefonica I+D jimenez at tid.es tf +34 91 4832660 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From GLIKSON at il.ibm.com Thu Sep 6 09:57:57 2012 From: GLIKSON at il.ibm.com (Alex Glikson) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 10:57:57 +0300 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] PCC meeting In-Reply-To: <0986BE7EB220D848BEF7ADDF53B634196ABA39B64D@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> References: <0986BE7EB220D848BEF7ADDF53B634196ABA39B64D@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> Message-ID: I have an important meeting at 5pm CET which I have to attend. Regards, Alex From: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO To: "fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu" , Date: 06/09/2012 10:45 AM Subject: [Fiware-pcc] PCC meeting Sent by: fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu Dear all We would like to have a PCC meeting essentially to discuss the comments to the Review and suggest further actions. A simple proposal would be just after the WPL meeting next September 10 at 16.30 CET. Any objections? BR ---- Jose Jimenez Telefonica I+D jimenez at tid.es tf +34 91 4832660 Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-pcc mailing list Fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-pcc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From axel.fasse at sap.com Thu Sep 6 10:05:13 2012 From: axel.fasse at sap.com (Fasse, Axel) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 10:05:13 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] PCC meeting In-Reply-To: <0986BE7EB220D848BEF7ADDF53B634196ABA39B64D@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> References: <0986BE7EB220D848BEF7ADDF53B634196ABA39B64D@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> Message-ID: <2C6296E1876B5C49962495FDACDC7A63616A9BA7B7@DEWDFECCR01.wdf.sap.corp> Dear Jose, I think it would be very helpful to have this meeting as soon as possible. Because of this, I will be available. If the timeslot does not fit for some of the other partners, maybe you can shift the start a little bit later. Best regards, Axel From: fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO Sent: Donnerstag, 6. September 2012 09:42 To: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-pcc] PCC meeting Dear all We would like to have a PCC meeting essentially to discuss the comments to the Review and suggest further actions. A simple proposal would be just after the WPL meeting next September 10 at 16.30 CET. Any objections? BR ---- Jose Jimenez Telefonica I+D jimenez at tid.es tf +34 91 4832660 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Thu Sep 6 10:59:04 2012 From: nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu (Nuria De-Lama Sanchez) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 10:59:04 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] PCC meeting In-Reply-To: <2C6296E1876B5C49962495FDACDC7A63616A9BA7B7@DEWDFECCR01.wdf.sap.corp> References: <0986BE7EB220D848BEF7ADDF53B634196ABA39B64D@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> <2C6296E1876B5C49962495FDACDC7A63616A9BA7B7@DEWDFECCR01.wdf.sap.corp> Message-ID: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A0115E174@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> Hi all, I also think we need to have the PCC as soon as possible. However, I will have a kick off meeting next Monday and Tuesday and it will be impossible for me to attend. Since exploitation and the business orientation of the project are very important topics for the next review I would ask you to reconsider the date and provide alternative options so that I can also participate. Could it be possible to do it on Thursday from 12:30 on? Friday morning also works for me. Nuria de Lama Research & Innovation Representative to the European Commission T +34 91214 9321 F +34 91754 3252 nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atosresearch.eu es.atos.net ________________________________ From: fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Fasse, Axel Sent: jueves, 06 de septiembre de 2012 10:05 To: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO Cc: 'fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu' (fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu) Subject: Re: [Fiware-pcc] PCC meeting Dear Jose, I think it would be very helpful to have this meeting as soon as possible. Because of this, I will be available. If the timeslot does not fit for some of the other partners, maybe you can shift the start a little bit later. Best regards, Axel From: fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO Sent: Donnerstag, 6. September 2012 09:42 To: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-pcc] PCC meeting Dear all We would like to have a PCC meeting essentially to discuss the comments to the Review and suggest further actions. A simple proposal would be just after the WPL meeting next September 10 at 16.30 CET. Any objections? BR ---- Jose Jimenez Telefonica I+D jimenez at tid.es tf +34 91 4832660 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 78 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 816 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Thu Sep 6 11:13:20 2012 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 11:13:20 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] PCC meeting In-Reply-To: <0986BE7EB220D848BEF7ADDF53B634196ABA39B64D@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> References: <0986BE7EB220D848BEF7ADDF53B634196ABA39B64D@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> Message-ID: dear pepe, yes a pcc meeting it is mandatory! unfortunately at that time i cannot (i have also problems with the wpl meeting new time in fact ...). ca you issue a doodle with more options? ciao, stefano 2012/9/6 JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO > Dear all**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > We would like to have a PCC meeting essentially to discuss the comments to > the Review and suggest further actions. A simple proposal would be just > after the WPL meeting next September 10 at 16.30 CET. **** > > ** ** > > Any objections?**** > > ** ** > > BR**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ----**** > > ** ** > > Jose Jimenez**** > > Telefonica I+D**** > > jimenez at tid.es**** > > tf +34 91 4832660 **** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ------------------------------ > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace > situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-pcc mailing list > Fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-pcc > > -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jimenez at tid.es Thu Sep 6 12:34:58 2012 From: jimenez at tid.es (JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO) Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 12:34:58 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] PCC meeting In-Reply-To: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A0115E174@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> References: <0986BE7EB220D848BEF7ADDF53B634196ABA39B64D@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> <2C6296E1876B5C49962495FDACDC7A63616A9BA7B7@DEWDFECCR01.wdf.sap.corp> <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A0115E174@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> Message-ID: <0986BE7EB220D848BEF7ADDF53B634196ABA39B64F@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> It seems we have to go for the doodle option... Please do not be unnecessarily restrictive and PLEASE answer promptly http://www.doodle.com/2m8huv96hk7tnmxi BR ---- Jose Jimenez Telefonica I+D jimenez at tid.es tf +34 91 4832660 De: Nuria De-Lama Sanchez [mailto:nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu] Enviado el: jueves, 06 de septiembre de 2012 10:59 Para: Fasse, Axel; JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO CC: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Asunto: RE: [Fiware-pcc] PCC meeting Hi all, I also think we need to have the PCC as soon as possible. However, I will have a kick off meeting next Monday and Tuesday and it will be impossible for me to attend. Since exploitation and the business orientation of the project are very important topics for the next review I would ask you to reconsider the date and provide alternative options so that I can also participate. Could it be possible to do it on Thursday from 12:30 on? Friday morning also works for me. Nuria de Lama Research & Innovation Representative to the European Commission T +34 91214 9321 F +34 91754 3252 nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atosresearch.eu es.atos.net [cid:image002.gif at 01CD8C29.285C2E50] ________________________________ From: fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Fasse, Axel Sent: jueves, 06 de septiembre de 2012 10:05 To: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO Cc: 'fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu' (fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu) Subject: Re: [Fiware-pcc] PCC meeting Dear Jose, I think it would be very helpful to have this meeting as soon as possible. Because of this, I will be available. If the timeslot does not fit for some of the other partners, maybe you can shift the start a little bit later. Best regards, Axel From: fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO Sent: Donnerstag, 6. September 2012 09:42 To: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-pcc] PCC meeting Dear all We would like to have a PCC meeting essentially to discuss the comments to the Review and suggest further actions. A simple proposal would be just after the WPL meeting next September 10 at 16.30 CET. Any objections? BR ---- Jose Jimenez Telefonica I+D jimenez at tid.es tf +34 91 4832660 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 78 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 816 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: From jimenez at tid.es Mon Sep 10 19:16:40 2012 From: jimenez at tid.es (JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 19:16:40 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] audio PCC fiware Message-ID: <0986BE7EB220D848BEF7ADDF53B634196ABA34B824@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> When: mi?rcoles, 19 de septiembre de 2012 9:00-10:30 (UTC+01:00) Bruselas, Copenhague, Madrid, Par?s. Note: The GMT offset above does not reflect daylight saving time adjustments. *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* Dear all After looking to the results of the doodle, this seems to be the best time for the audio. Unfortunately, Pascal is not able to attend The main issue is Actions after the project review, but we shall send the pre- minutes in the usual manner We'll use powwownow. PIN: 050662. Local dial-in phone numbers at: http://pdf.powwownow.com/pdf/USA_en_pwn-dial-in-numbers.pdf Best regards ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/calendar Size: 2475 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jhierro at tid.es Tue Sep 11 06:02:57 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 06:02:57 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] [Suspected Spam] Fwd: RE: Notes from confcall on analysis of the status of FI-WARE and the FI-PPP In-Reply-To: <8D75402F31CB9044A8BE98020FB2D7A508EF04@S-DC-ESTB03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> References: <8D75402F31CB9044A8BE98020FB2D7A508EF04@S-DC-ESTB03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> Message-ID: <504EB7F1.80909@tid.es> Dear colleagues, This is an email that may provide some background/input to our discussions on recovery steps within the FI-WARE PCC. We had a confcall with the Peter Fatelning and Arian Zwegers from the EC on September 3th trying to understand what are the priorities where we should concentrate our efforts in FI-WARE during the upcoming months, taking an overall FI-PPP program perspective. We took some notes of this interesting discussion and sent them back to Peter and Arian so that they could confirm our notes were accurate and/or make any further comments. I'm forwarding their response to you below of my signature "as it was", so that there is no any doubt about how accurate it could be any translation we may elaborate and send to you. There are a number of points that we believe are remarkable. Here you are our elaboration on them: * The top priority issue for the EC seems to be, by far, the sustainability of what we deliver. Regarding specifications of FI-WARE GEs, this has to do with sustainability of any reference implementation we will develop in FI-WARE but also with completeness/quality of published specifications and the terms and conditions established in Legal Notices attached to them, which should warrant that 3rd parties can, and will be attracted to, implement products in compliance with specifications. Note that most of this was capture in check point number 11 of the list of check points on page 10 of the month 12 official review report. Our conversation with the EC has been helpful to highlight how crucial this checkpoint is compared to the the rest. * Regarding sustainability of the reference implementations we will develop in FI-WARE, it seems like the EC will ask for a formal statement by partners owning the implementations about their intends to commercialize them as products under FRAND terms or provide them as Open Source if those commercial plans become not viable. We feel like we are going to be asked to provide such formal statement sometime end of October, early November (probably close to our next review). It is not clear to us to what extend we will be asked by the EC to drop any FI-WARE GE for which such a formal statement cannot be made, but certainly the EC wants that UC Trials in second phase of the FI-PPP take an informed decision on what FI-WARE GEs to use in the second phase of the FI-PPP based on statements provided. We personally believe that there may not be anything on our contract that may force us to drop a given FI-WARE GE in, say it, the second Release of FI-WARE, if such a statement cannot be made, but we guess it will be rather difficult to seek for funding to be devoted to maintain/evolve those GEs within the context of the Technology Foundation continuation project planned in phase 3. We would also add that we probably have to reconsider their inclusion in the Second Release of FI-WARE anyway, given the fact that we would not be backed by the EC on keeping them. * The EC is concerned about the completeness/quality of FI-WARE GE Open Specifications but not that much about the need to fix this "tomorrow". Clearly we should show a clear improvement in month 18, of course. However, the timing that is critical is that of making them rather usable by UC Trials in phase 2, and be able to provide an statement on commercial sustainability before that, rather than serving UC Projects needs in phase 1. * Clearly, supporting UC projects in phase 1 is important but not the critical thing from the EC's perspective. Providing a "perfect" support to the UC projects in phase 1 regarding usage of a given FI-WARE GE implementation is rather nice, but of no use if we are not going to be able to make any statement about commercial viability of that implementation (under FRAND terms, which may include provision of Open Source licenses or not). Making a statement about commercial viability of the implementation of a FI-WARE GE may minimize the impact of not providing a "perfect" support to UC projects in phase 1. Of course, we shouldn't use this as an alibi for a lack of support to UC projects in phase 1. We should try to do our best in that respect ... though priorities are clear. * The EC clearly welcomes our last efforts to make the FI-WARE Testbed available and welcome the management decisions implemented during the last months leading those efforts. We at TID know that some of those decisions were tough, and still we have to work on being more rigorous with planning and follow-up of activities. But all of this will pave the way to success. We hope that you share this. We would also like to share with you that Telefonica welcomes any constructive feedback and ideas that may help to improve overall performance. We would like to know if you would share this elaboration. Your comments/feedback is rather welcome. Anyways, take this as input for discussion during our PCC meeting. Cheers, -- Juanjo -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: Notes from confcall on analysis of the status of FI-WARE and the FI-PPP Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 16:25:28 +0000 From: To: CC: , , , Dear Juanjo, Please find below our comments to your summary. Kind regards, Peter From: Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2012 8:10 AM To: FATELNIG Peter (CNECT); ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Cc: VILLASANTE Jesus (CNECT); Jose Jimenez; jhierro >> "Juan J. Hierro" Subject: Notes from confcall on analysis of the status of FI-WARE and the FI-PPP Dear Peter and Arian, Thanks for the open conversation maintained yesterday. The goal for us was to understand what are the priorities in which FI-WARE should concentrate on during the upcoming months, so that we make sure that we recover from the current situation, taking an overall FI-PPP program perspective. I would like to summarize the notes I took on your feedback in order to make sure that we deliver an accurate message to the rest of the FI-WARE partners. According to my notes: ? The very first priority of FI-WARE should be to make sure that, in month 18, each partner that owns a reference implementation of a given FI-WARE GE makes a commitment to make such reference implementation commercially available within the context of the FI-PPP and beyond. This means that: o The FI-WARE GE reference implementation owner should make a clear commitment to commercialize the FI-WARE GE reference implementation it owns under FRAND conditions during and beyond the FI-PPP, accompanied by a commitment to deliver such reference implementation as Open Source in the case that commercialization of a reference implementation of the GE in compliance with FI-WARE specifications is discontinued; or o The FI-WARE GE reference implementation owner makes a clear commitment to deliver a reference implementation of the GE as Open Source The commitment statement must contain all information that possible users need in order to decide about using the GE reference implementation concerned or not, within the context of the PPP and outside. This means, for instance, that a timing needs to be indicated, the exact conditions and constraints need to be specified, etc. All details might not be known at this stage, for call 2, but as much information as possible should be provided. ? The second priority of FI-WARE should be to make sure that the FI-WARE Architecture Description and Open Specifications are usable by both application developers and potential FI-WARE GE implementors, meaning they gather all the necessary information to allow them to develop applications and compliant implementation. Despite these Architecture Description and Open Specifications may be improved over time (the project is 3 years long), FI-WARE should be able to reach a certain minimum level of quality in month 18 The GE Open Specifications must contain all information needed to implement the GE; they must be self-contained (also without FI-WARE Architecture Description). We are currently looking at the different Legal Notices associated to the GE Open Specifications and will come back to that. ? Rest is of less priority, including support to FI-PPP UC projects in phase 1. Of course, this not meaning that FI-WARE should try to make its best to support usage of the FI-WARE Testbed during this period. We have indicated the points which are a clear priority and we think we have been consistent in doing so from the beginning. This does not mean that FI-WARE should ignore other points mentioned in the review reports and outcome letter. We are confident that the partners in the consortium have the ability to address the points in the review reports and outcome letters and to deliver results that are useful to themselves, other partners in the PPP, and third parties. We are also confident that the FI-WARE management will be able to take a leading role, and we are happy to see that actions taken after month 12 have resulted in improvements already, for instance by the delivery of the Testbed. Your confirmation that these notes are accurate is rather welcome. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Tue Sep 11 06:37:30 2012 From: nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu (Nuria De-Lama Sanchez) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 06:37:30 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] audio PCC fiware In-Reply-To: <0986BE7EB220D848BEF7ADDF53B634196ABA34B824@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> References: <0986BE7EB220D848BEF7ADDF53B634196ABA34B824@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> Message-ID: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A011C88EC@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> Hi Pepe, Is there no option to have the teleconference on Friday? Thursday would also be much better. Unfortunately I am travelling to Brussels to attend the Infoday of the FI PPP (it will be held on Wednesday), which makes my attendance completely impossible. Thanks in advance, <> Nuria de Lama Research & Innovation Representative to the European Commission T +34 91214 9321 F +34 91754 3252 nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atosresearch.eu es.atos.net <> -----Original Appointment----- From: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO [mailto:jimenez at tid.es] Sent: lunes, 10 de septiembre de 2012 19:17 To: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-pcc] audio PCC fiware When: mi?rcoles, 19 de septiembre de 2012 9:00-10:30 (GMT+01:00) Brussels, Copenhagen, Madrid, Paris. Where: Dear all After looking to the results of the doodle, this seems to be the best time for the audio. Unfortunately, Pascal is not able to attend The main issue is Actions after the project review, but we shall send the pre- minutes in the usual manner We'll use powwownow. PIN: 050662. Local dial-in phone numbers at: http://pdf.powwownow.com/pdf/USA_en_pwn-dial-in-numbers.pdf Best regards ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx << File: ATT1873370.txt >> ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ole0.bmp Type: image/bmp Size: 106 bytes Desc: ole0.bmp URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ole1.bmp Type: image/bmp Size: 4606 bytes Desc: ole1.bmp URL: From jimenez at tid.es Tue Sep 11 08:56:05 2012 From: jimenez at tid.es (JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 08:56:05 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] audio PCC fiware In-Reply-To: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A011C88EC@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> References: <0986BE7EB220D848BEF7ADDF53B634196ABA34B824@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A011C88EC@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> Message-ID: <0986BE7EB220D848BEF7ADDF53B634196ABA34B845@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> Hi Nuria The PCC is on Wednesday, not today. Normally you should be able to attend. In any case, please, try to answer doodles asap. otherwise those things will happen., I personally do not mind changing, but Fridays are very bad for our Israeli partners. That is the reason why they are excluded from the doodle BR De: Nuria De-Lama Sanchez [mailto:nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu] Enviado el: martes, 11 de septiembre de 2012 6:38 Para: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO; fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu CC: Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena Asunto: RE: [Fiware-pcc] audio PCC fiware Hi Pepe, Is there no option to have the teleconference on Friday? Thursday would also be much better. Unfortunately I am travelling to Brussels to attend the Infoday of the FI PPP (it will be held on Wednesday), which makes my attendance completely impossible. Thanks in advance, [cid:image001.gif at 01CD8FFA.391E1080] Nuria de Lama Research & Innovation Representative to the European Commission T +34 91214 9321 F +34 91754 3252 nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atosresearch.eu es.atos.net [cid:image002.png at 01CD8FFA.391E1080] -----Original Appointment----- From: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO [mailto:jimenez at tid.es] Sent: lunes, 10 de septiembre de 2012 19:17 To: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-pcc] audio PCC fiware When: mi?rcoles, 19 de septiembre de 2012 9:00-10:30 (GMT+01:00) Brussels, Copenhagen, Madrid, Paris. Where: Dear all After looking to the results of the doodle, this seems to be the best time for the audio. Unfortunately, Pascal is not able to attend The main issue is Actions after the project review, but we shall send the pre- minutes in the usual manner We'll use powwownow. PIN: 050662. Local dial-in phone numbers at: http://pdf.powwownow.com/pdf/USA_en_pwn-dial-in-numbers.pdf Best regards ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx << File: ATT1873370.txt >> ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 80 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.png Type: image/png Size: 817 bytes Desc: image002.png URL: From nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Tue Sep 11 09:46:27 2012 From: nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu (Nuria De-Lama Sanchez) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 09:46:27 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] audio PCC fiware In-Reply-To: <0986BE7EB220D848BEF7ADDF53B634196ABA34B845@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> References: <0986BE7EB220D848BEF7ADDF53B634196ABA34B824@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A011C88EC@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> <0986BE7EB220D848BEF7ADDF53B634196ABA34B845@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> Message-ID: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A011C894E@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> Umm?I am not sure if I misunderstood something. Yes, the teleconference is on Wednesday; and the Infoday is on Wednesday too. Did not I fill in the doodle early enough? I think I was one of the first ones. I include Juan Bare?o in CC in case it is not feasible to change the date and in case he can attend this time on behalf of Atos (even though I would like to attend). Nuria de Lama Research & Innovation Representative to the European Commission T +34 91214 9321 F +34 91754 3252 nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atosresearch.eu es.atos.net ________________________________ From: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO [mailto:jimenez at tid.es] Sent: martes, 11 de septiembre de 2012 8:56 To: Nuria De-Lama Sanchez; fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena Subject: RE: [Fiware-pcc] audio PCC fiware Hi Nuria The PCC is on Wednesday, not today. Normally you should be able to attend. In any case, please, try to answer doodles asap. otherwise those things will happen., I personally do not mind changing, but Fridays are very bad for our Israeli partners. That is the reason why they are excluded from the doodle BR De: Nuria De-Lama Sanchez [mailto:nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu] Enviado el: martes, 11 de septiembre de 2012 6:38 Para: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO; fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu CC: Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena Asunto: RE: [Fiware-pcc] audio PCC fiware Hi Pepe, Is there no option to have the teleconference on Friday? Thursday would also be much better. Unfortunately I am travelling to Brussels to attend the Infoday of the FI PPP (it will be held on Wednesday), which makes my attendance completely impossible. Thanks in advance, Nuria de Lama Research & Innovation Representative to the European Commission T +34 91214 9321 F +34 91754 3252 nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atosresearch.eu es.atos.net -----Original Appointment----- From: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO [mailto:jimenez at tid.es] Sent: lunes, 10 de septiembre de 2012 19:17 To: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-pcc] audio PCC fiware When: mi?rcoles, 19 de septiembre de 2012 9:00-10:30 (GMT+01:00) Brussels, Copenhagen, Madrid, Paris. Where: Dear all After looking to the results of the doodle, this seems to be the best time for the audio. Unfortunately, Pascal is not able to attend The main issue is Actions after the project review, but we shall send the pre- minutes in the usual manner We'll use powwownow. PIN: 050662. Local dial-in phone numbers at: http://pdf.powwownow.com/pdf/USA_en_pwn-dial-in-numbers.pdf Best regards ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx << File: ATT1873370.txt >> ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image003.gif Type: image/gif Size: 78 bytes Desc: image003.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image004.gif Type: image/gif Size: 816 bytes Desc: image004.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image005.gif Type: image/gif Size: 80 bytes Desc: image005.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image006.png Type: image/png Size: 817 bytes Desc: image006.png URL: From pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com Tue Sep 11 12:32:03 2012 From: pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com (BISSON Pascal) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 12:32:03 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] audio PCC fiware In-Reply-To: <0986BE7EB220D848BEF7ADDF53B634196ABA34B824@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> References: <0986BE7EB220D848BEF7ADDF53B634196ABA34B824@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> Message-ID: <5855_1347359525_504F1325_5855_6096_1_1a74d2db-d665-4870-abfc-5b2216a2f703@THSONEA01HUB04P.one.grp> Dear Jos?, As told this is not convenient to me also because from 10am to 11am I also have the FI-WARE testbed audio conf to attend. So would suggest to go for another slot since I heard I was not the only one of us who may have problem to attend. Thanks in advance. Best Regards, Pascal -----Rendez-vous d'origine----- De : JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO [mailto:jimenez at tid.es] Envoy? : lundi 10 septembre 2012 19:17 ? : fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : [Fiware-pcc] audio PCC fiware Date : mercredi 19 septembre 2012 09:00-10:30 (GMT+01:00) Bruxelles, Copenhague, Madrid, Paris. O? : Dear all After looking to the results of the doodle, this seems to be the best time for the audio. Unfortunately, Pascal is not able to attend The main issue is Actions after the project review, but we shall send the pre- minutes in the usual manner We'll use powwownow. PIN: 050662. Local dial-in phone numbers at: http://pdf.powwownow.com/pdf/USA_en_pwn-dial-in-numbers.pdf Best regards ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx << Fichier: ATT00001.txt >> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jimenez at tid.es Tue Sep 11 17:33:23 2012 From: jimenez at tid.es (JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 17:33:23 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] audio PCC fiware In-Reply-To: <5855_1347359525_504F1325_5855_6096_1_1a74d2db-d665-4870-abfc-5b2216a2f703@THSONEA01HUB04P.one.grp> References: <0986BE7EB220D848BEF7ADDF53B634196ABA34B824@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> <5855_1347359525_504F1325_5855_6096_1_1a74d2db-d665-4870-abfc-5b2216a2f703@THSONEA01HUB04P.one.grp> Message-ID: <0986BE7EB220D848BEF7ADDF53B634196ABA34B916@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> Dear Pascal dear all OK, I have no major problems to propose an alternative date, but I would ask you all to reconsider the doodle with more options. With the present answers it is very difficult to proceed. http://www.doodle.com/2m8huv96hk7tnmxi If you offer more options, we could try to reschedule the meeting BR De: BISSON Pascal [mailto:pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com] Enviado el: martes, 11 de septiembre de 2012 12:32 Para: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO; fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu CC: BISSON Pascal Asunto: RE: audio PCC fiware Importancia: Alta Dear Jos?, As told this is not convenient to me also because from 10am to 11am I also have the FI-WARE testbed audio conf to attend. So would suggest to go for another slot since I heard I was not the only one of us who may have problem to attend. Thanks in advance. Best Regards, Pascal -----Rendez-vous d'origine----- De : JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO [mailto:jimenez at tid.es] Envoy? : lundi 10 septembre 2012 19:17 ? : fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : [Fiware-pcc] audio PCC fiware Date : mercredi 19 septembre 2012 09:00-10:30 (GMT+01:00) Bruxelles, Copenhague, Madrid, Paris. O? : Dear all After looking to the results of the doodle, this seems to be the best time for the audio. Unfortunately, Pascal is not able to attend The main issue is Actions after the project review, but we shall send the pre- minutes in the usual manner We'll use powwownow. PIN: 050662. Local dial-in phone numbers at: http://pdf.powwownow.com/pdf/USA_en_pwn-dial-in-numbers.pdf Best regards ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx << Fichier: ATT00001.txt >> ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jimenez at tid.es Sat Sep 15 11:03:50 2012 From: jimenez at tid.es (JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO) Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 11:03:50 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] Fiware review Message-ID: <7507DF2C-8E41-4B26-A065-C0181BC97D6B@tid.es> Dear all We have received a mail from Arian proposing 27-30 November as a date for the next Fiware review. That review will take place in Brussels (not in Seville). Please inform us - before next Pcc - of any problems associated with that date In any case, following Arian suggestions, we shall organize an event in Seville, shortly before the review, where attendance of Pcc, and indeed representatives of fiware partners will be required. We shall discuss this issue at our next pcc audio conference Best -- Jose Jimenez Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx From thierry.nagellen at orange.com Mon Sep 17 08:34:57 2012 From: thierry.nagellen at orange.com (thierry.nagellen at orange.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 06:34:57 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] Fiware review In-Reply-To: <7507DF2C-8E41-4B26-A065-C0181BC97D6B@tid.es> References: <7507DF2C-8E41-4B26-A065-C0181BC97D6B@tid.es> Message-ID: <15434_1347863698_5056C492_15434_2188_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C051AC0@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> Dear all, No main concern regarding the date for the next review but I would have more information regarding what will happen in Seville and what will happen in Brussels. Typically what about the Business Unit representative involvement? We are not alone and have to check that some other key people will be available for the expected dates. BR Thierry -----Message d'origine----- De?: fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO Envoy??: samedi 15 septembre 2012 11:04 ??: fiware-pcc Objet?: [Fiware-pcc] Fiware review Dear all We have received a mail from Arian proposing 27-30 November as a date for the next Fiware review. That review will take place in Brussels (not in Seville). Please inform us - before next Pcc - of any problems associated with that date In any case, following Arian suggestions, we shall organize an event in Seville, shortly before the review, where attendance of Pcc, and indeed representatives of fiware partners will be required. We shall discuss this issue at our next pcc audio conference Best -- Jose Jimenez Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-pcc mailing list Fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-pcc _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. From jimenez at tid.es Mon Sep 17 08:38:58 2012 From: jimenez at tid.es (JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 06:38:58 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] Dates for Seville review In-Reply-To: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D0A5A45@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> References: <0986BE7EB220D848BEF7ADDF53B634196ABA39B694@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D0A444D@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> <0986BE7EB220D848BEF7ADDF53B634196ABA39B69E@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D0A5027@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> <0986BE7EB220D848BEF7ADDF53B634196ABA39B6AF@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D0A5A45@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> Message-ID: Dear Arian Just as a point of confirmation. We understand the review to be made in Brussels do not require we send the commercial people there. We understand those people will still go to Seville. Can you confirm this, please? BR ---- Jose Jimenez Telefonica I+D jimenez at tid.es tf +34 91 4832660 De: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu [mailto:Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu] Enviado el: viernes, 14 de septiembre de 2012 18:41 Para: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; CARLOS RALLI UCENDO CC: Peter.Fatelnig at ec.europa.eu; Jesus.Villasante at ec.europa.eu; CNECT-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu Asunto: RE: Dates for Seville review Dear all, I now have the outcome of the Doodle poll with the reviewers: the only option is Nov 28-30 (and, if needed Nov 27). Given the interest with my management, we prefer Brussels as the location. I do realise this is a change from what the reviewers indicated before. As mentioned below, this gives you the freedom to plan the Seville event whenever you want, possibly taking into account the agendas of Mario, Jesus and Peter. One or two reviewers will be present as well, and the event will be fully taken into account for the M18 review. Could you please confirm date/place of the review from your side? Best regards, Arian. From: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO [mailto:jimenez at tid.es] Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 5:04 PM To: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Cc: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; CARLOS RALLI UCENDO; FATELNIG Peter (CNECT); VILLASANTE Jesus (CNECT); CNECT-ICT-285248 Subject: RE: Dates for Seville review Dear Arian Thank you very much. My only concern was to try to avoid too much travel for you and the reviewers, that need to go twice to Seville, (one of the event and again to the review). That was the reason for collocating them (of course in different dates :) but let us say event on Tuesday and review in Thursday) BR ---- Jose Jimenez Telefonica I+D jimenez at tid.es tf +34 91 4832660 De: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu [mailto:Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu] Enviado el: viernes, 14 de septiembre de 2012 12:28 Para: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO CC: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; CARLOS RALLI UCENDO; Peter.Fatelnig at ec.europa.eu; Jesus.Villasante at ec.europa.eu; CNECT-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu Asunto: RE: Dates for Seville review Dear all, Thank you very much for this initiative. We welcome the idea to organise an event around the test bed and open innovation lab of Seville, and we will make sure that the EC will be suitably represented. However, we have some doubts about combining the event with the review and the timing of both. End of October is perhaps a bit early. You have just received the review report; the consortium has just returned from holiday, and half the consortium will be working on Call 2. How realistic is it to address all points in the review report within a couple of weeks? Will there be deliverables available for the review meeting? Two weeks before the review meeting? Are you not too optimistic here? May I remind you that very clear progress needs to be shown after the "unsatisfactory" outcome of the M12 review? Furthermore, the review meeting would be just after or just before the event. It cannot be on the same day. It might be worthwhile to have 1-2 reviewers at the event, who would make a visit report that can be included in the review report, but it is not very useful to have the whole team present. It would be nice for the reviewers to see the commitment from Telefonica and perhaps others during the event, but real commitment needs to be shown via other means. Finally, I want the reviewers to have an insight into the outcome of the Call 2 evaluation when they write their review report. End of October / beginning of November is then too early. So it is better to split the event and the review. You can plan the event whenever you want, and I will see which reviewers to send. We will check Mario's and Jesus' agenda and send you their availability. The review meeting will then be later, e.g. end of November. And the review will obviously take into account the Seville event and its outcomes. Best regards, Arian. From: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO [mailto:jimenez at tid.es] Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 4:51 PM To: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Cc: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; CARLOS RALLI UCENDO; FATELNIG Peter (CNECT) Subject: RE: Dates for Seville review End of October, beginning of November BR ---- Jose Jimenez Telefonica I+D jimenez at tid.es tf +34 91 4832660 De: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu [mailto:Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu] Enviado el: jueves, 13 de septiembre de 2012 16:21 Para: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO CC: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; CARLOS RALLI UCENDO; Peter.Fatelnig at ec.europa.eu Asunto: RE: Dates for Seville review Dear Jose, What is roughly the period you had in mind for the review? I saw a G13 document mentioning FI-WARE review in October?? Best regards, Arian. From: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO [mailto:jimenez at tid.es] Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 1:21 PM To: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Cc: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; CARLOS RALLI UCENDO; FATELNIG Peter (CNECT) Subject: Dates for Seville review Dear Arian As you know, one important activity we need to perform in the next months is to show reviewers and the Commission that the test bed and open innovation lab of Seville is in good shape and that steps are taken to assure full dissemination and involvement of the business units of all involved partners To do that, we are trying to prepare an event in Seville with presence of Commercial people from Telefonica and also some politicians from Seville and Spanish government to show Telefonica and Spanish commitment. In order to be successful we would need firs of all an early indication of the exact dates for the event. Also, as I said, we want to convert Seville review into a major PPP event, with presence beyond the reviewers, including EC people, perhaps including Mario and the relevant staff from your side. We definitely think this would be a good idea, but we need early confirmation from your side. This we should use also to get backing from Concord to the activities. So I would like to get your feedback on this idea before fully involving people in the plan Thank you ---- Jose Jimenez Telefonica I+D jimenez at tid.es tf +34 91 4832660 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu Mon Sep 17 08:42:31 2012 From: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu (Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 06:42:31 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] Dates for Seville review In-Reply-To: References: <0986BE7EB220D848BEF7ADDF53B634196ABA39B694@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D0A444D@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> <0986BE7EB220D848BEF7ADDF53B634196ABA39B69E@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D0A5027@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> <0986BE7EB220D848BEF7ADDF53B634196ABA39B6AF@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D0A5A45@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> Message-ID: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D0A61BF@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> Yes, that is correct. Arian From: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO [mailto:jimenez at tid.es] Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 8:39 AM To: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Cc: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: Dates for Seville review Dear Arian Just as a point of confirmation. We understand the review to be made in Brussels do not require we send the commercial people there. We understand those people will still go to Seville. Can you confirm this, please? BR ---- Jose Jimenez Telefonica I+D jimenez at tid.es tf +34 91 4832660 De: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu [mailto:Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu] Enviado el: viernes, 14 de septiembre de 2012 18:41 Para: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; CARLOS RALLI UCENDO CC: Peter.Fatelnig at ec.europa.eu; Jesus.Villasante at ec.europa.eu; CNECT-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu Asunto: RE: Dates for Seville review Dear all, I now have the outcome of the Doodle poll with the reviewers: the only option is Nov 28-30 (and, if needed Nov 27). Given the interest with my management, we prefer Brussels as the location. I do realise this is a change from what the reviewers indicated before. As mentioned below, this gives you the freedom to plan the Seville event whenever you want, possibly taking into account the agendas of Mario, Jesus and Peter. One or two reviewers will be present as well, and the event will be fully taken into account for the M18 review. Could you please confirm date/place of the review from your side? Best regards, Arian. From: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO [mailto:jimenez at tid.es] Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 5:04 PM To: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Cc: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; CARLOS RALLI UCENDO; FATELNIG Peter (CNECT); VILLASANTE Jesus (CNECT); CNECT-ICT-285248 Subject: RE: Dates for Seville review Dear Arian Thank you very much. My only concern was to try to avoid too much travel for you and the reviewers, that need to go twice to Seville, (one of the event and again to the review). That was the reason for collocating them (of course in different dates :) but let us say event on Tuesday and review in Thursday) BR ---- Jose Jimenez Telefonica I+D jimenez at tid.es tf +34 91 4832660 De: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu [mailto:Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu] Enviado el: viernes, 14 de septiembre de 2012 12:28 Para: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO CC: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; CARLOS RALLI UCENDO; Peter.Fatelnig at ec.europa.eu; Jesus.Villasante at ec.europa.eu; CNECT-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu Asunto: RE: Dates for Seville review Dear all, Thank you very much for this initiative. We welcome the idea to organise an event around the test bed and open innovation lab of Seville, and we will make sure that the EC will be suitably represented. However, we have some doubts about combining the event with the review and the timing of both. End of October is perhaps a bit early. You have just received the review report; the consortium has just returned from holiday, and half the consortium will be working on Call 2. How realistic is it to address all points in the review report within a couple of weeks? Will there be deliverables available for the review meeting? Two weeks before the review meeting? Are you not too optimistic here? May I remind you that very clear progress needs to be shown after the "unsatisfactory" outcome of the M12 review? Furthermore, the review meeting would be just after or just before the event. It cannot be on the same day. It might be worthwhile to have 1-2 reviewers at the event, who would make a visit report that can be included in the review report, but it is not very useful to have the whole team present. It would be nice for the reviewers to see the commitment from Telefonica and perhaps others during the event, but real commitment needs to be shown via other means. Finally, I want the reviewers to have an insight into the outcome of the Call 2 evaluation when they write their review report. End of October / beginning of November is then too early. So it is better to split the event and the review. You can plan the event whenever you want, and I will see which reviewers to send. We will check Mario's and Jesus' agenda and send you their availability. The review meeting will then be later, e.g. end of November. And the review will obviously take into account the Seville event and its outcomes. Best regards, Arian. From: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO [mailto:jimenez at tid.es] Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 4:51 PM To: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Cc: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; CARLOS RALLI UCENDO; FATELNIG Peter (CNECT) Subject: RE: Dates for Seville review End of October, beginning of November BR ---- Jose Jimenez Telefonica I+D jimenez at tid.es tf +34 91 4832660 De: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu [mailto:Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu] Enviado el: jueves, 13 de septiembre de 2012 16:21 Para: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO CC: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; CARLOS RALLI UCENDO; Peter.Fatelnig at ec.europa.eu Asunto: RE: Dates for Seville review Dear Jose, What is roughly the period you had in mind for the review? I saw a G13 document mentioning FI-WARE review in October?? Best regards, Arian. From: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO [mailto:jimenez at tid.es] Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 1:21 PM To: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Cc: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; CARLOS RALLI UCENDO; FATELNIG Peter (CNECT) Subject: Dates for Seville review Dear Arian As you know, one important activity we need to perform in the next months is to show reviewers and the Commission that the test bed and open innovation lab of Seville is in good shape and that steps are taken to assure full dissemination and involvement of the business units of all involved partners To do that, we are trying to prepare an event in Seville with presence of Commercial people from Telefonica and also some politicians from Seville and Spanish government to show Telefonica and Spanish commitment. In order to be successful we would need firs of all an early indication of the exact dates for the event. Also, as I said, we want to convert Seville review into a major PPP event, with presence beyond the reviewers, including EC people, perhaps including Mario and the relevant staff from your side. We definitely think this would be a good idea, but we need early confirmation from your side. This we should use also to get backing from Concord to the activities. So I would like to get your feedback on this idea before fully involving people in the plan Thank you ---- Jose Jimenez Telefonica I+D jimenez at tid.es tf +34 91 4832660 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jimenez at tid.es Mon Sep 17 08:56:45 2012 From: jimenez at tid.es (JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 06:56:45 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] audio PCC fiware In-Reply-To: <5855_1347359525_504F1325_5855_6096_1_1a74d2db-d665-4870-abfc-5b2216a2f703@THSONEA01HUB04P.one.grp> References: <0986BE7EB220D848BEF7ADDF53B634196ABA34B824@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> <5855_1347359525_504F1325_5855_6096_1_1a74d2db-d665-4870-abfc-5b2216a2f703@THSONEA01HUB04P.one.grp> Message-ID: Dear Pascal As indicated, I would be most willing to modify the date for the PCC audioconference, but still it seems your availability for this week is so limited we cannot count on your presence. Therefore, I propose we keep the date of next Wednesday 19 at 9 CET. I really regret it, perhaps you could send a proxy, In any case, we shall use the minutes the usual way and you can follow the process offline and send your comments in advance. BR ---- Jose Jimenez Telefonica I+D jimenez at tid.es tf +34 91 4832660 De: BISSON Pascal [mailto:pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com] Enviado el: martes, 11 de septiembre de 2012 12:32 Para: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO; fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu CC: BISSON Pascal Asunto: RE: audio PCC fiware Importancia: Alta Dear Jos?, As told this is not convenient to me also because from 10am to 11am I also have the FI-WARE testbed audio conf to attend. So would suggest to go for another slot since I heard I was not the only one of us who may have problem to attend. Thanks in advance. Best Regards, Pascal -----Rendez-vous d'origine----- De : JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO [mailto:jimenez at tid.es] Envoy? : lundi 10 septembre 2012 19:17 ? : fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : [Fiware-pcc] audio PCC fiware Date : mercredi 19 septembre 2012 09:00-10:30 (GMT+01:00) Bruxelles, Copenhague, Madrid, Paris. O? : Dear all After looking to the results of the doodle, this seems to be the best time for the audio. Unfortunately, Pascal is not able to attend The main issue is Actions after the project review, but we shall send the pre- minutes in the usual manner We'll use powwownow. PIN: 050662. Local dial-in phone numbers at: http://pdf.powwownow.com/pdf/USA_en_pwn-dial-in-numbers.pdf Best regards ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx << Fichier: ATT00001.txt >> ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com Mon Sep 17 09:43:49 2012 From: pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com (BISSON Pascal) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 09:43:49 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] audio PCC fiware In-Reply-To: References: <0986BE7EB220D848BEF7ADDF53B634196ABA34B824@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> <5855_1347359525_504F1325_5855_6096_1_1a74d2db-d665-4870-abfc-5b2216a2f703@THSONEA01HUB04P.one.grp> Message-ID: <5508_1347867827_5056D4B3_5508_8392_1_0dccd9df-de3b-4309-adf7-0c94ba2a711b@THSONEA01HUB01P.one.grp> Dear Jos?, Despite I would be in Brussels for a meeting I will take necessary steps to join and be with you and colleagues being said we have important things to discuss at this PCC. Best Regards, Pascal De : JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO [mailto:jimenez at tid.es] Envoy? : lundi 17 septembre 2012 08:57 ? : BISSON Pascal; fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : RE: audio PCC fiware Dear Pascal As indicated, I would be most willing to modify the date for the PCC audioconference, but still it seems your availability for this week is so limited we cannot count on your presence. Therefore, I propose we keep the date of next Wednesday 19 at 9 CET. I really regret it, perhaps you could send a proxy, In any case, we shall use the minutes the usual way and you can follow the process offline and send your comments in advance. BR ---- Jose Jimenez Telefonica I+D jimenez at tid.es tf +34 91 4832660 De: BISSON Pascal [mailto:pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com] Enviado el: martes, 11 de septiembre de 2012 12:32 Para: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO; fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu CC: BISSON Pascal Asunto: RE: audio PCC fiware Importancia: Alta Dear Jos?, As told this is not convenient to me also because from 10am to 11am I also have the FI-WARE testbed audio conf to attend. So would suggest to go for another slot since I heard I was not the only one of us who may have problem to attend. Thanks in advance. Best Regards, Pascal -----Rendez-vous d'origine----- De : JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO [mailto:jimenez at tid.es] Envoy? : lundi 10 septembre 2012 19:17 ? : fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : [Fiware-pcc] audio PCC fiware Date : mercredi 19 septembre 2012 09:00-10:30 (GMT+01:00) Bruxelles, Copenhague, Madrid, Paris. O? : Dear all After looking to the results of the doodle, this seems to be the best time for the audio. Unfortunately, Pascal is not able to attend The main issue is Actions after the project review, but we shall send the pre- minutes in the usual manner We'll use powwownow. PIN: 050662. Local dial-in phone numbers at: http://pdf.powwownow.com/pdf/USA_en_pwn-dial-in-numbers.pdf Best regards ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx << Fichier: ATT00001.txt >> ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Mon Sep 17 10:57:59 2012 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 10:57:59 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] Fiware review In-Reply-To: <7507DF2C-8E41-4B26-A065-C0181BC97D6B@tid.es> References: <7507DF2C-8E41-4B26-A065-C0181BC97D6B@tid.es> Message-ID: dear jose, the proposed dates are fine with me. ciao, stefano 2012/9/15 JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO > > Dear all > > We have received a mail from Arian proposing 27-30 November as a date for > the next Fiware review. That review will take place in Brussels (not in > Seville). > > Please inform us - before next Pcc - of any problems associated with that > date > > In any case, following Arian suggestions, we shall organize an event in > Seville, shortly before the review, where attendance of Pcc, and indeed > representatives of fiware partners will be required. We shall discuss this > issue at our next pcc audio conference > > Best > -- > Jose Jimenez > > > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace > situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-pcc mailing list > Fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-pcc > -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jimenez at tid.es Mon Sep 17 11:30:33 2012 From: jimenez at tid.es (JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 09:30:33 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] (no subject) Message-ID: Dear PCC Please find enclosed the link for the minutes of the Audio conference https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OYKAby2t1ef7tZvNJyi_Eyco5fNUITu8aQ1EdmdYDxI/edit# Please have a look BEFORE THE MEETING and include all items you consider relevant. Particularly, include your comments to the review as sent by the EC. https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/7/1309/FI-WARE+Review+3+Report.pdf We shall not discuss the comments unless you propose an specific action point Also, take into account Juanjo's report of our conversation with Arian and Peter. (attached) We know, PCC meetings are always long. Please try to make it easier with a careful preparation BR ---- Jose Jimenez Telefonica I+D jimenez at tid.es tf +34 91 4832660 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA Subject: [Fiware-pcc] [Suspected Spam] Fwd: RE: Notes from confcall on analysis of the status of FI-WARE and the FI-PPP Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 04:02:57 +0000 Size: 38010 URL: From mcp at tid.es Tue Sep 18 12:42:24 2012 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 12:42:24 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] Local infodays Message-ID: <50585010.7070501@tid.es> Dear all, As agreed in a WPL/WPA follow up call in mid August, we should have prospective answers from the local clusters (Germany, Italy, Spain and France at least) telling us if there is scope for local infodays and the answer you got from your contacts with the national authorities of your respective countries. This will be mentioned tomorrow in the PCC meeting, where we could start planning the strategy for the near future. The 2nd open call opened on the 1st of August (http://www.fi-ware.eu/open-call/) and it is closing at the beginning of novermber, we should not put it off much longer. Best regards, Miguel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx From thierry.nagellen at orange.com Tue Sep 18 15:46:45 2012 From: thierry.nagellen at orange.com (thierry.nagellen at orange.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 13:46:45 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] [Fiware-wpl] Local infodays In-Reply-To: <50585010.7070501@tid.es> References: <50585010.7070501@tid.es> Message-ID: <9275_1347976006_50587B46_9275_2666_21_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C05F715@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> Dear all I'm in contact with Ubifrance which is working with our National Contact Point and we try to organize the infoday on the beginning of October. The potential dates are 1st, 8th, 9th or 10th of October. I should finalize the agenda and fix the date for the end of the week. BR Thierry -----Message d'origine----- De?: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de Miguel Carrillo Envoy??: mardi 18 septembre 2012 12:42 ??: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet?: [Fiware-wpl] Local infodays Dear all, As agreed in a WPL/WPA follow up call in mid August, we should have prospective answers from the local clusters (Germany, Italy, Spain and France at least) telling us if there is scope for local infodays and the answer you got from your contacts with the national authorities of your respective countries. This will be mentioned tomorrow in the PCC meeting, where we could start planning the strategy for the near future. The 2nd open call opened on the 1st of August (http://www.fi-ware.eu/open-call/) and it is closing at the beginning of novermber, we should not put it off much longer. Best regards, Miguel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. From jhierro at tid.es Wed Sep 19 09:52:16 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 09:52:16 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] Fwd: Fwd: RE: Notes from confcall on analysis of the status of FI-WARE and the FI-PPP In-Reply-To: <504EB7F1.80909@tid.es> References: <504EB7F1.80909@tid.es> Message-ID: <505979B0.6030707@tid.es> Just wanted to make it clear that in my email on the conversation with the EC, I already highlighted that what was designated as highest priority by them was already at the checkpoint list of the review report. See text marked in red. Best regards, -- Juanjo -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Fwd: RE: Notes from confcall on analysis of the status of FI-WARE and the FI-PPP Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 06:02:57 +0200 From: Juanjo Hierro To: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu CC: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu , fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Dear colleagues, This is an email that may provide some background/input to our discussions on recovery steps within the FI-WARE PCC. We had a confcall with the Peter Fatelning and Arian Zwegers from the EC on September 3th trying to understand what are the priorities where we should concentrate our efforts in FI-WARE during the upcoming months, taking an overall FI-PPP program perspective. We took some notes of this interesting discussion and sent them back to Peter and Arian so that they could confirm our notes were accurate and/or make any further comments. I'm forwarding their response to you below of my signature "as it was", so that there is no any doubt about how accurate it could be any translation we may elaborate and send to you. There are a number of points that we believe are remarkable. Here you are our elaboration on them: * The top priority issue for the EC seems to be, by far, the sustainability of what we deliver. Regarding specifications of FI-WARE GEs, this has to do with sustainability of any reference implementation we will develop in FI-WARE but also with completeness/quality of published specifications and the terms and conditions established in Legal Notices attached to them, which should warrant that 3rd parties can, and will be attracted to, implement products in compliance with specifications. Note that most of this was capture in check point number 11 of the list of check points on page 10 of the month 12 official review report. Our conversation with the EC has been helpful to highlight how crucial this checkpoint is compared to the the rest. * Regarding sustainability of the reference implementations we will develop in FI-WARE, it seems like the EC will ask for a formal statement by partners owning the implementations about their intends to commercialize them as products under FRAND terms or provide them as Open Source if those commercial plans become not viable. We feel like we are going to be asked to provide such formal statement sometime end of October, early November (probably close to our next review). It is not clear to us to what extend we will be asked by the EC to drop any FI-WARE GE for which such a formal statement cannot be made, but certainly the EC wants that UC Trials in second phase of the FI-PPP take an informed decision on what FI-WARE GEs to use in the second phase of the FI-PPP based on statements provided. We personally believe that there may not be anything on our contract that may force us to drop a given FI-WARE GE in, say it, the second Release of FI-WARE, if such a statement cannot be made, but we guess it will be rather difficult to seek for funding to be devoted to maintain/evolve those GEs within the context of the Technology Foundation continuation project planned in phase 3. We would also add that we probably have to reconsider their inclusion in the Second Release of FI-WARE anyway, given the fact that we would not be backed by the EC on keeping them. * The EC is concerned about the completeness/quality of FI-WARE GE Open Specifications but not that much about the need to fix this "tomorrow". Clearly we should show a clear improvement in month 18, of course. However, the timing that is critical is that of making them rather usable by UC Trials in phase 2, and be able to provide an statement on commercial sustainability before that, rather than serving UC Projects needs in phase 1. * Clearly, supporting UC projects in phase 1 is important but not the critical thing from the EC's perspective. Providing a "perfect" support to the UC projects in phase 1 regarding usage of a given FI-WARE GE implementation is rather nice, but of no use if we are not going to be able to make any statement about commercial viability of that implementation (under FRAND terms, which may include provision of Open Source licenses or not). Making a statement about commercial viability of the implementation of a FI-WARE GE may minimize the impact of not providing a "perfect" support to UC projects in phase 1. Of course, we shouldn't use this as an alibi for a lack of support to UC projects in phase 1. We should try to do our best in that respect ... though priorities are clear. * The EC clearly welcomes our last efforts to make the FI-WARE Testbed available and welcome the management decisions implemented during the last months leading those efforts. We at TID know that some of those decisions were tough, and still we have to work on being more rigorous with planning and follow-up of activities. But all of this will pave the way to success. We hope that you share this. We would also like to share with you that Telefonica welcomes any constructive feedback and ideas that may help to improve overall performance. We would like to know if you would share this elaboration. Your comments/feedback is rather welcome. Anyways, take this as input for discussion during our PCC meeting. Cheers, -- Juanjo -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: Notes from confcall on analysis of the status of FI-WARE and the FI-PPP Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 16:25:28 +0000 From: To: CC: , , , Dear Juanjo, Please find below our comments to your summary. Kind regards, Peter From: Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2012 8:10 AM To: FATELNIG Peter (CNECT); ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Cc: VILLASANTE Jesus (CNECT); Jose Jimenez; jhierro >> "Juan J. Hierro" Subject: Notes from confcall on analysis of the status of FI-WARE and the FI-PPP Dear Peter and Arian, Thanks for the open conversation maintained yesterday. The goal for us was to understand what are the priorities in which FI-WARE should concentrate on during the upcoming months, so that we make sure that we recover from the current situation, taking an overall FI-PPP program perspective. I would like to summarize the notes I took on your feedback in order to make sure that we deliver an accurate message to the rest of the FI-WARE partners. According to my notes: ? The very first priority of FI-WARE should be to make sure that, in month 18, each partner that owns a reference implementation of a given FI-WARE GE makes a commitment to make such reference implementation commercially available within the context of the FI-PPP and beyond. This means that: o The FI-WARE GE reference implementation owner should make a clear commitment to commercialize the FI-WARE GE reference implementation it owns under FRAND conditions during and beyond the FI-PPP, accompanied by a commitment to deliver such reference implementation as Open Source in the case that commercialization of a reference implementation of the GE in compliance with FI-WARE specifications is discontinued; or o The FI-WARE GE reference implementation owner makes a clear commitment to deliver a reference implementation of the GE as Open Source The commitment statement must contain all information that possible users need in order to decide about using the GE reference implementation concerned or not, within the context of the PPP and outside. This means, for instance, that a timing needs to be indicated, the exact conditions and constraints need to be specified, etc. All details might not be known at this stage, for call 2, but as much information as possible should be provided. ? The second priority of FI-WARE should be to make sure that the FI-WARE Architecture Description and Open Specifications are usable by both application developers and potential FI-WARE GE implementors, meaning they gather all the necessary information to allow them to develop applications and compliant implementation. Despite these Architecture Description and Open Specifications may be improved over time (the project is 3 years long), FI-WARE should be able to reach a certain minimum level of quality in month 18 The GE Open Specifications must contain all information needed to implement the GE; they must be self-contained (also without FI-WARE Architecture Description). We are currently looking at the different Legal Notices associated to the GE Open Specifications and will come back to that. ? Rest is of less priority, including support to FI-PPP UC projects in phase 1. Of course, this not meaning that FI-WARE should try to make its best to support usage of the FI-WARE Testbed during this period. We have indicated the points which are a clear priority and we think we have been consistent in doing so from the beginning. This does not mean that FI-WARE should ignore other points mentioned in the review reports and outcome letter. We are confident that the partners in the consortium have the ability to address the points in the review reports and outcome letters and to deliver results that are useful to themselves, other partners in the PPP, and third parties. We are also confident that the FI-WARE management will be able to take a leading role, and we are happy to see that actions taken after month 12 have resulted in improvements already, for instance by the delivery of the Testbed. Your confirmation that these notes are accurate is rather welcome. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jimenez at tid.es Wed Sep 19 14:15:24 2012 From: jimenez at tid.es (JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 12:15:24 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] Dates for Seville review In-Reply-To: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D0A61BF@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> References: <0986BE7EB220D848BEF7ADDF53B634196ABA39B694@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D0A444D@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> <0986BE7EB220D848BEF7ADDF53B634196ABA39B69E@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D0A5027@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> <0986BE7EB220D848BEF7ADDF53B634196ABA39B6AF@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D0A5A45@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D0A61BF@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> Message-ID: Dear Arian I am sending to you a draft agenda for the Seville event. The best dates are in the week November 5th-8th As you can see, we are planning for a two day meeting. The first will be focused on FI-WARE and it will be followed by a second day more focused in Spanish SMEs participation. We are planning for an opening ceremony of a significant representative from Seville (perhaps the Major) (or the Spanish Ministry of Industry). We think Mario's presence would be adequate. We would like to see a possible confirmation before inviting them As usual, comments on the proposed agenda are welcomed. BR ---- Jose Jimenez Telefonica I+D jimenez at tid.es tf +34 91 4832660 De: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu [mailto:Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu] Enviado el: lunes, 17 de septiembre de 2012 8:43 Para: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO CC: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Asunto: RE: Dates for Seville review Yes, that is correct. Arian From: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO [mailto:jimenez at tid.es] Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 8:39 AM To: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Cc: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: Dates for Seville review Dear Arian Just as a point of confirmation. We understand the review to be made in Brussels do not require we send the commercial people there. We understand those people will still go to Seville. Can you confirm this, please? BR ---- Jose Jimenez Telefonica I+D jimenez at tid.es tf +34 91 4832660 De: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu [mailto:Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu] Enviado el: viernes, 14 de septiembre de 2012 18:41 Para: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; CARLOS RALLI UCENDO CC: Peter.Fatelnig at ec.europa.eu; Jesus.Villasante at ec.europa.eu; CNECT-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu Asunto: RE: Dates for Seville review Dear all, I now have the outcome of the Doodle poll with the reviewers: the only option is Nov 28-30 (and, if needed Nov 27). Given the interest with my management, we prefer Brussels as the location. I do realise this is a change from what the reviewers indicated before. As mentioned below, this gives you the freedom to plan the Seville event whenever you want, possibly taking into account the agendas of Mario, Jesus and Peter. One or two reviewers will be present as well, and the event will be fully taken into account for the M18 review. Could you please confirm date/place of the review from your side? Best regards, Arian. From: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO [mailto:jimenez at tid.es] Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 5:04 PM To: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Cc: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; CARLOS RALLI UCENDO; FATELNIG Peter (CNECT); VILLASANTE Jesus (CNECT); CNECT-ICT-285248 Subject: RE: Dates for Seville review Dear Arian Thank you very much. My only concern was to try to avoid too much travel for you and the reviewers, that need to go twice to Seville, (one of the event and again to the review). That was the reason for collocating them (of course in different dates :) but let us say event on Tuesday and review in Thursday) BR ---- Jose Jimenez Telefonica I+D jimenez at tid.es tf +34 91 4832660 De: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu [mailto:Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu] Enviado el: viernes, 14 de septiembre de 2012 12:28 Para: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO CC: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; CARLOS RALLI UCENDO; Peter.Fatelnig at ec.europa.eu; Jesus.Villasante at ec.europa.eu; CNECT-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu Asunto: RE: Dates for Seville review Dear all, Thank you very much for this initiative. We welcome the idea to organise an event around the test bed and open innovation lab of Seville, and we will make sure that the EC will be suitably represented. However, we have some doubts about combining the event with the review and the timing of both. End of October is perhaps a bit early. You have just received the review report; the consortium has just returned from holiday, and half the consortium will be working on Call 2. How realistic is it to address all points in the review report within a couple of weeks? Will there be deliverables available for the review meeting? Two weeks before the review meeting? Are you not too optimistic here? May I remind you that very clear progress needs to be shown after the "unsatisfactory" outcome of the M12 review? Furthermore, the review meeting would be just after or just before the event. It cannot be on the same day. It might be worthwhile to have 1-2 reviewers at the event, who would make a visit report that can be included in the review report, but it is not very useful to have the whole team present. It would be nice for the reviewers to see the commitment from Telefonica and perhaps others during the event, but real commitment needs to be shown via other means. Finally, I want the reviewers to have an insight into the outcome of the Call 2 evaluation when they write their review report. End of October / beginning of November is then too early. So it is better to split the event and the review. You can plan the event whenever you want, and I will see which reviewers to send. We will check Mario's and Jesus' agenda and send you their availability. The review meeting will then be later, e.g. end of November. And the review will obviously take into account the Seville event and its outcomes. Best regards, Arian. From: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO [mailto:jimenez at tid.es] Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 4:51 PM To: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Cc: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; CARLOS RALLI UCENDO; FATELNIG Peter (CNECT) Subject: RE: Dates for Seville review End of October, beginning of November BR ---- Jose Jimenez Telefonica I+D jimenez at tid.es tf +34 91 4832660 De: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu [mailto:Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu] Enviado el: jueves, 13 de septiembre de 2012 16:21 Para: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO CC: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; CARLOS RALLI UCENDO; Peter.Fatelnig at ec.europa.eu Asunto: RE: Dates for Seville review Dear Jose, What is roughly the period you had in mind for the review? I saw a G13 document mentioning FI-WARE review in October?? Best regards, Arian. From: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO [mailto:jimenez at tid.es] Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 1:21 PM To: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Cc: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; CARLOS RALLI UCENDO; FATELNIG Peter (CNECT) Subject: Dates for Seville review Dear Arian As you know, one important activity we need to perform in the next months is to show reviewers and the Commission that the test bed and open innovation lab of Seville is in good shape and that steps are taken to assure full dissemination and involvement of the business units of all involved partners To do that, we are trying to prepare an event in Seville with presence of Commercial people from Telefonica and also some politicians from Seville and Spanish government to show Telefonica and Spanish commitment. In order to be successful we would need firs of all an early indication of the exact dates for the event. Also, as I said, we want to convert Seville review into a major PPP event, with presence beyond the reviewers, including EC people, perhaps including Mario and the relevant staff from your side. We definitely think this would be a good idea, but we need early confirmation from your side. This we should use also to get backing from Concord to the activities. So I would like to get your feedback on this idea before fully involving people in the plan Thank you ---- Jose Jimenez Telefonica I+D jimenez at tid.es tf +34 91 4832660 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Seville Event programme1.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 15746 bytes Desc: Seville Event programme1.docx URL: From jimenez at tid.es Wed Sep 19 18:47:52 2012 From: jimenez at tid.es (JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 16:47:52 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] Scientific and MAC Message-ID: Dear Arian As you know, in the existing version of the DoW we still have the Scientific council and the MAC. We have considered the issue at a PCC meeting today and the general feeling of the consortium was that those groups are not really useful to the project any more. They were initially plan as a input body for getting information on real world scientific and market situation, but, as the project has developed, we have found that the UA projects were a much more useful and reliable information source. Also, we think the function of those groups is redundant with the Advisory Board, recently put forward by CONCORD The consortium considers the funding needed for those groups could be much better used in a different way, so we are asking you for permission for not including them in a future version of the DoW and find a better use for the funding initial planned for those activities. If you still think they could be useful, our proposal would be they are could perhaps assist in the event to be carried out in Seville. Anyway, we look forward your suggestions in this direction. Best regards ---- Jose Jimenez Telefonica I+D jimenez at tid.es tf +34 91 4832660 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Thu Sep 20 15:20:51 2012 From: nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu (Nuria De-Lama Sanchez) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 15:20:51 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] Local and regional Infodays for the Second Open Call Message-ID: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A0121EBF9@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> Dear all, (ANSWERS ONLY TO ME INCLUDING PEOPLE FROM TID IN CC; I WILL INTEGRATE THEM FOR THE PCC) As a follow up of an e-mail recently sent my Miguel on Local Infodays to promote the Second Open Call of FI-WARE I would like to inform you that I have had a discussion this morning with Ana Garc?a, of CONCORD just to work on the possible collaboration for the organization of such Infodays. This is very important because the Call is closing at the beginning of November and one of the comments of the EC in the last review was that we HAD TO further disseminate the Open Calls, widening the constituency and representing major countries in Europe. This topic was discussed in the last PCC meeting and some local Infodays are under preparation, but please, read this information and follow the instructions. ? FI-WARE should at least organize Infodays in Spain, France, Italy, Germany... ? I am aware of ongoing work for: o Infoday in Madrid ? already fixed on the 4th October o Infoday in France (Paris?) ? potential dates are 1st, 8th, 9th or 10th of October o Please, other members of the PCC ? can you please send me the details of your Infodays? Now, these are the additional opportunities CONCORD is offering (they will take care of the organization of the Infodays/events but will not cover the cost of travels) ? Spain o Bilbao (Basque Country) ? 8 or 9, October (supported by GAIA; potential audience of 300+ SMEs) o Castell?n ? 15, October (technology Park) o Action: TID, ATOS to confirm interest and availability for these dates ? UK (dates TBC) o Coventry o Manchester o Action: all partners (preference: UK-based partners) to confirm interest and their availability to discuss with CONCORD the organization ? Greece o Action: all partners to confirm interest and their availability in the coming weeks (especially important feedback by Italian partners) ? Belgium (a region different from Brussels) o Action: all partners to confirm interest and their availability in the coming weeks ? Helsinki o Action: all partners to confirm interest and their availability in the coming weeks ? Sweden (Lulea) o Action: all partners to confirm interest and their availability in the coming weeks Note that: ? Main goal is to present the Open Call and be able to answer questions (therefore, a technical speaker is desirable); ? Explaining as secondary goal the Open Innovation Lab and how to get involved later on could also be useful (for some SMEs) ? ALL partners have responsibility in this, so events will be assigned to the partners that are close to the venues if no volunteers Thanks for your collaboration. Nuria de Lama Research & Innovation Representative to the European Commission T +34 91214 9321 F +34 91754 3252 nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atosresearch.eu es.atos.net ________________________________ ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 78 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 816 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: From mcp at tid.es Thu Sep 20 17:19:40 2012 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 17:19:40 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] Local and regional Infodays for the Second Open Call In-Reply-To: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A0121EBF9@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> References: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A0121EBF9@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> Message-ID: <505B340C.1070803@tid.es> Dear all, Just an update. One of the PPP projects, Infinity, is announcing an open call shortly (they'll do so on the 1st of October). They would appreciate a brief timeslot (about 15 minutes) in some of the local infodays. They have already confirmed their interest in the Spanish one. Also, they would like to take part in the the French one. Pascal has already confimed that this is ok for Thales, I understad that Thierry or Henk do not mind either, in fact this reinforces an image of cooperation towards the EC and the PPP Community. So when new infodays are defined, do not forget that we have to contact Infinity to pass them the info and see if they want to join us. Best regards, Miguel El 20/09/2012 15:20, Nuria De-Lama Sanchez escribi?: Dear all, (ANSWERS ONLY TO ME INCLUDING PEOPLE FROM TID IN CC; I WILL INTEGRATE THEM FOR THE PCC) As a follow up of an e-mail recently sent my Miguel on Local Infodays to promote the Second Open Call of FI-WARE I would like to inform you that I have had a discussion this morning with Ana Garc?a, of CONCORD just to work on the possible collaboration for the organization of such Infodays. This is very important because the Call is closing at the beginning of November and one of the comments of the EC in the last review was that we HAD TO further disseminate the Open Calls, widening the constituency and representing major countries in Europe. This topic was discussed in the last PCC meeting and some local Infodays are under preparation, but please, read this information and follow the instructions. ? FI-WARE should at least organize Infodays in Spain, France, Italy, Germany... ? I am aware of ongoing work for: o Infoday in Madrid --> already fixed on the 4th October o Infoday in France (Paris?) --> potential dates are 1st, 8th, 9th or 10th of October o Please, other members of the PCC --> can you please send me the details of your Infodays? Now, these are the additional opportunities CONCORD is offering (they will take care of the organization of the Infodays/events but will not cover the cost of travels) ? Spain o Bilbao (Basque Country) --> 8 or 9, October (supported by GAIA; potential audience of 300+ SMEs) o Castell?n --> 15, October (technology Park) o Action: TID, ATOS to confirm interest and availability for these dates ? UK (dates TBC) o Coventry o Manchester o Action: all partners (preference: UK-based partners) to confirm interest and their availability to discuss with CONCORD the organization ? Greece o Action: all partners to confirm interest and their availability in the coming weeks (especially important feedback by Italian partners) ? Belgium (a region different from Brussels) o Action: all partners to confirm interest and their availability in the coming weeks ? Helsinki o Action: all partners to confirm interest and their availability in the coming weeks ? Sweden (Lulea) o Action: all partners to confirm interest and their availability in the coming weeks Note that: ? Main goal is to present the Open Call and be able to answer questions (therefore, a technical speaker is desirable); ? Explaining as secondary goal the Open Innovation Lab and how to get involved later on could also be useful (for some SMEs) ? ALL partners have responsibility in this, so events will be assigned to the partners that are close to the venues if no volunteers Thanks for your collaboration. Nuria de Lama Research & Innovation Representative to the European Commission T +34 91214 9321 F +34 91754 3252 nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atosresearch.eu es.atos.net [cid:349045816 at 01072011-319C] ________________________________ ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Fiware-pcc mailing list Fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-pcc -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/gif Size: 78 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/gif Size: 816 bytes Desc: not available URL: From thierry.nagellen at orange.com Fri Sep 21 07:57:12 2012 From: thierry.nagellen at orange.com (thierry.nagellen at orange.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 05:57:12 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] Local and regional Infodays for the Second Open Call In-Reply-To: <505B340C.1070803@tid.es> References: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A0121EBF9@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> <505B340C.1070803@tid.es> Message-ID: <30834_1348207033_505C01B9_30834_18803_2_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C0611C4@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> Dear all For the French infoday we can include a 30' slot at the end of the session but I need the information about the call today. The infoday is in 2 weeks so we have to send the invitations next Monday. I expect that Pascal will be able to provide that content today. BR Thierry De : fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de Miguel Carrillo Envoy? : jeudi 20 septembre 2012 17:20 ? : fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : Re: [Fiware-pcc] Local and regional Infodays for the Second Open Call Dear all, Just an update. One of the PPP projects, Infinity, is announcing an open call shortly (they'll do so on the 1st of October). They would appreciate a brief timeslot (about 15 minutes) in some of the local infodays. They have already confirmed their interest in the Spanish one. Also, they would like to take part in the the French one. Pascal has already confimed that this is ok for Thales, I understad that Thierry or Henk do not mind either, in fact this reinforces an image of cooperation towards the EC and the PPP Community. So when new infodays are defined, do not forget that we have to contact Infinity to pass them the info and see if they want to join us. Best regards, Miguel El 20/09/2012 15:20, Nuria De-Lama Sanchez escribi?: Dear all, (ANSWERS ONLY TO ME INCLUDING PEOPLE FROM TID IN CC; I WILL INTEGRATE THEM FOR THE PCC) As a follow up of an e-mail recently sent my Miguel on Local Infodays to promote the Second Open Call of FI-WARE I would like to inform you that I have had a discussion this morning with Ana Garc?a, of CONCORD just to work on the possible collaboration for the organization of such Infodays. This is very important because the Call is closing at the beginning of November and one of the comments of the EC in the last review was that we HAD TO further disseminate the Open Calls, widening the constituency and representing major countries in Europe. This topic was discussed in the last PCC meeting and some local Infodays are under preparation, but please, read this information and follow the instructions. * FI-WARE should at least organize Infodays in Spain, France, Italy, Germany... * I am aware of ongoing work for: o Infoday in Madrid --> already fixed on the 4th October o Infoday in France (Paris?) --> potential dates are 1st, 8th, 9th or 10th of October o Please, other members of the PCC --> can you please send me the details of your Infodays? Now, these are the additional opportunities CONCORD is offering (they will take care of the organization of the Infodays/events but will not cover the cost of travels) * Spain o Bilbao (Basque Country) --> 8 or 9, October (supported by GAIA; potential audience of 300+ SMEs) o Castell?n --> 15, October (technology Park) o Action: TID, ATOS to confirm interest and availability for these dates * UK (dates TBC) o Coventry o Manchester o Action: all partners (preference: UK-based partners) to confirm interest and their availability to discuss with CONCORD the organization * Greece o Action: all partners to confirm interest and their availability in the coming weeks (especially important feedback by Italian partners) * Belgium (a region different from Brussels) o Action: all partners to confirm interest and their availability in the coming weeks * Helsinki o Action: all partners to confirm interest and their availability in the coming weeks * Sweden (Lulea) o Action: all partners to confirm interest and their availability in the coming weeks Note that: * Main goal is to present the Open Call and be able to answer questions (therefore, a technical speaker is desirable); * Explaining as secondary goal the Open Innovation Lab and how to get involved later on could also be useful (for some SMEs) * ALL partners have responsibility in this, so events will be assigned to the partners that are close to the venues if no volunteers Thanks for your collaboration. Nuria de Lama Research & Innovation Representative to the European Commission T +34 91214 9321 F +34 91754 3252 nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atosresearch.eu es.atos.net [cid:349045816 at 01072011-319C] ________________________________ ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Fiware-pcc mailing list Fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-pcc -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 78 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 816 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: From mcp at tid.es Fri Sep 21 10:26:15 2012 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 10:26:15 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] Fwd: [Fiware-wpa] [INES] Segunda convocatoria FI-WARE In-Reply-To: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A0121EE0B@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> References: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A0121EE0B@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> Message-ID: <505C24A7.4030309@tid.es> Dear all, I resend this e-mail from Nuria just in case it did not reach some of you. This message she's sending is rather timely and we encourage you to follow her instructions. Kind regards, Miguel -------- Mensaje original -------- Asunto: [Fiware-wpa] [INES] Segunda convocatoria FI-WARE Fecha: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 09:55:21 +0200 De: Nuria De-Lama Sanchez Para: , Hi all, We are disseminating the Open Call of FI-WARE through many channels. Of course I did it internally in Atos so that our employees and colleagues can send it to other technology providers. Find below the dissemination through the Spanish Technology Platform INES (devoted to Software and Services), of course in Spanish.. I think it is important that all partners in the consortium do the same (regarding regional and national initiatives) that could widen the target audience of FI-WARE. This is not only useful for the purpose of the Open Call, but to make people aware of the project and have already a "seed" for community building. Please, keep us informed about your actions so that they can be reported later on. Thanks! Nuria de Lama Research & Innovation Representative to the European Commission T +34 91214 9321 F +34 91754 3252 nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atosresearch.eu es.atos.net [cid:349045816 at 01072011-319C] ________________________________ From: ines-miembros-bounces at lists.atosresearch.eu [mailto:ines-miembros-bounces at lists.atosresearch.eu] On Behalf Of Secretaria de Ines Sent: viernes, 21 de septiembre de 2012 9:00 To: Ines-miembros at lists.atosresearch.eu Subject: [Ines-miembros] Segunda convocatoria FI-WARE Al inter?s de los miembros de INES, El proyecto FI-WARE, ha puesto en marcha la segunda Convocatoria para la incorporaci?n de nuevos socios al proyecto. FI-WARE desarrollar? una nueva infraestructura de servicios, construida sobre bloques de c?digo gen?ricos y reutilizables llamados "Generic Enablers". En esta convocatoria se busca organizaciones que deseen contribuir o desarrollar los "Generic Enablers" relacionadas con las interfaces de usuarios, desarrollo y manejo de plataformas Cloud y transmisi?n y flujo de contenido. Inicio Convocatoria: Agosto 1, 2012 Cierre Convocatoria: Noviembre 7, 2012 Financiaci?n de la Convocatoria: 6 Millones de Euros Para obtener m?s informaci?n visite la Web: http://www.fi-ware.eu/open-call/. Saludos. [SECRETARIA DE INES Web: www.ines.org.es Email: sines at mail.atosresearch.eu][Description: ines_hd] SECRETARIA DE INES Web: www.ines.org.es Email: sines at mail.atosresearch.eu ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/gif Size: 78 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/gif Size: 816 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/png Size: 2312 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/png Size: 5220 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- _______________________________________________ Ines-miembros mailing list Ines-miembros at lists.atosresearch.eu http://lists.atosresearch.eu/mailman/listinfo/ines-miembros -------------- next part -------------- _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpa mailing list Fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpa From Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu Tue Sep 25 16:07:31 2012 From: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu (Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 14:07:31 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] Dates for Seville review In-Reply-To: References: <0986BE7EB220D848BEF7ADDF53B634196ABA39B694@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D0A444D@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> <0986BE7EB220D848BEF7ADDF53B634196ABA39B69E@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D0A5027@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> <0986BE7EB220D848BEF7ADDF53B634196ABA39B6AF@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D0A5A45@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D0A61BF@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> Message-ID: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D0BD84B@S-DC-ESTF01-J.net1.cec.eu.int> Dear Jose, Just to let you know that we are checking the availability of our hierarchy to attend the Seville event. Unfortunately, this takes more time than anticipated. Some of us will be in Warsaw the next few days, so communication will be limited. Conchi will attend the Steering Board meeting in Madrid. Best regards, Arian. From: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO [mailto:jimenez at tid.es] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 2:15 PM To: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Cc: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; FATELNIG Peter (CNECT); VILLASANTE Jesus (CNECT) Subject: RE: Dates for Seville review Dear Arian I am sending to you a draft agenda for the Seville event. The best dates are in the week November 5th-8th As you can see, we are planning for a two day meeting. The first will be focused on FI-WARE and it will be followed by a second day more focused in Spanish SMEs participation. We are planning for an opening ceremony of a significant representative from Seville (perhaps the Major) (or the Spanish Ministry of Industry). We think Mario?s presence would be adequate. We would like to see a possible confirmation before inviting them As usual, comments on the proposed agenda are welcomed. BR ---- Jose Jimenez Telefonica I+D jimenez at tid.es tf +34 91 4832660 De: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu [mailto:Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu] Enviado el: lunes, 17 de septiembre de 2012 8:43 Para: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO CC: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Asunto: RE: Dates for Seville review Yes, that is correct. Arian From: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO [mailto:jimenez at tid.es] Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 8:39 AM To: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Cc: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: Dates for Seville review Dear Arian Just as a point of confirmation. We understand the review to be made in Brussels do not require we send the commercial people there. We understand those people will still go to Seville. Can you confirm this, please? BR ---- Jose Jimenez Telefonica I+D jimenez at tid.es tf +34 91 4832660 De: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu [mailto:Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu] Enviado el: viernes, 14 de septiembre de 2012 18:41 Para: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; CARLOS RALLI UCENDO CC: Peter.Fatelnig at ec.europa.eu; Jesus.Villasante at ec.europa.eu; CNECT-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu Asunto: RE: Dates for Seville review Dear all, I now have the outcome of the Doodle poll with the reviewers: the only option is Nov 28-30 (and, if needed Nov 27). Given the interest with my management, we prefer Brussels as the location. I do realise this is a change from what the reviewers indicated before. As mentioned below, this gives you the freedom to plan the Seville event whenever you want, possibly taking into account the agendas of Mario, Jesus and Peter. One or two reviewers will be present as well, and the event will be fully taken into account for the M18 review. Could you please confirm date/place of the review from your side? Best regards, Arian. From: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO [mailto:jimenez at tid.es] Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 5:04 PM To: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Cc: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; CARLOS RALLI UCENDO; FATELNIG Peter (CNECT); VILLASANTE Jesus (CNECT); CNECT-ICT-285248 Subject: RE: Dates for Seville review Dear Arian Thank you very much. My only concern was to try to avoid too much travel for you and the reviewers, that need to go twice to Seville, (one of the event and again to the review). That was the reason for collocating them (of course in different dates :) but let us say event on Tuesday and review in Thursday) BR ---- Jose Jimenez Telefonica I+D jimenez at tid.es tf +34 91 4832660 De: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu [mailto:Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu] Enviado el: viernes, 14 de septiembre de 2012 12:28 Para: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO CC: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; CARLOS RALLI UCENDO; Peter.Fatelnig at ec.europa.eu; Jesus.Villasante at ec.europa.eu; CNECT-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu Asunto: RE: Dates for Seville review Dear all, Thank you very much for this initiative. We welcome the idea to organise an event around the test bed and open innovation lab of Seville, and we will make sure that the EC will be suitably represented. However, we have some doubts about combining the event with the review and the timing of both. End of October is perhaps a bit early. You have just received the review report; the consortium has just returned from holiday, and half the consortium will be working on Call 2. How realistic is it to address all points in the review report within a couple of weeks? Will there be deliverables available for the review meeting? Two weeks before the review meeting? Are you not too optimistic here? May I remind you that very clear progress needs to be shown after the "unsatisfactory" outcome of the M12 review? Furthermore, the review meeting would be just after or just before the event. It cannot be on the same day. It might be worthwhile to have 1-2 reviewers at the event, who would make a visit report that can be included in the review report, but it is not very useful to have the whole team present. It would be nice for the reviewers to see the commitment from Telefonica and perhaps others during the event, but real commitment needs to be shown via other means. Finally, I want the reviewers to have an insight into the outcome of the Call 2 evaluation when they write their review report. End of October / beginning of November is then too early. So it is better to split the event and the review. You can plan the event whenever you want, and I will see which reviewers to send. We will check Mario's and Jesus' agenda and send you their availability. The review meeting will then be later, e.g. end of November. And the review will obviously take into account the Seville event and its outcomes. Best regards, Arian. From: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO [mailto:jimenez at tid.es] Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 4:51 PM To: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Cc: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; CARLOS RALLI UCENDO; FATELNIG Peter (CNECT) Subject: RE: Dates for Seville review End of October, beginning of November BR ---- Jose Jimenez Telefonica I+D jimenez at tid.es tf +34 91 4832660 De: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu [mailto:Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu] Enviado el: jueves, 13 de septiembre de 2012 16:21 Para: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO CC: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; CARLOS RALLI UCENDO; Peter.Fatelnig at ec.europa.eu Asunto: RE: Dates for Seville review Dear Jose, What is roughly the period you had in mind for the review? I saw a G13 document mentioning FI-WARE review in October?? Best regards, Arian. From: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO [mailto:jimenez at tid.es] Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 1:21 PM To: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Cc: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; CARLOS RALLI UCENDO; FATELNIG Peter (CNECT) Subject: Dates for Seville review Dear Arian As you know, one important activity we need to perform in the next months is to show reviewers and the Commission that the test bed and open innovation lab of Seville is in good shape and that steps are taken to assure full dissemination and involvement of the business units of all involved partners To do that, we are trying to prepare an event in Seville with presence of Commercial people from Telefonica and also some politicians from Seville and Spanish government to show Telefonica and Spanish commitment. In order to be successful we would need firs of all an early indication of the exact dates for the event. Also, as I said, we want to convert Seville review into a major PPP event, with presence beyond the reviewers, including EC people, perhaps including Mario and the relevant staff from your side. We definitely think this would be a good idea, but we need early confirmation from your side. This we should use also to get backing from Concord to the activities. So I would like to get your feedback on this idea before fully involving people in the plan Thank you ---- Jose Jimenez Telefonica I+D jimenez at tid.es tf +34 91 4832660 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu Tue Sep 25 17:07:42 2012 From: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu (Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 15:07:42 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] Dates for Seville review References: <0986BE7EB220D848BEF7ADDF53B634196ABA39B694@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D0A444D@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> <0986BE7EB220D848BEF7ADDF53B634196ABA39B69E@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D0A5027@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> <0986BE7EB220D848BEF7ADDF53B634196ABA39B6AF@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D0A5A45@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D0A61BF@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> Message-ID: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D0BE8F8@S-DC-ESTF01-J.net1.cec.eu.int> Dear Jose, I have just been informed that the hierarchy is not available that week. Peter and I will be available to attend on Nov 7 or 8. Please let us know what date you will choose. Also, please let me know the dates for the review at the end of November. Best regards, Arian. From: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 4:08 PM To: 'JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO' Cc: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; FATELNIG Peter (CNECT); VILLASANTE Jesus (CNECT) Subject: RE: Dates for Seville review Dear Jose, Just to let you know that we are checking the availability of our hierarchy to attend the Seville event. Unfortunately, this takes more time than anticipated. Some of us will be in Warsaw the next few days, so communication will be limited. Conchi will attend the Steering Board meeting in Madrid. Best regards, Arian. From: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO [mailto:jimenez at tid.es] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 2:15 PM To: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Cc: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; FATELNIG Peter (CNECT); VILLASANTE Jesus (CNECT) Subject: RE: Dates for Seville review Dear Arian I am sending to you a draft agenda for the Seville event. The best dates are in the week November 5th-8th As you can see, we are planning for a two day meeting. The first will be focused on FI-WARE and it will be followed by a second day more focused in Spanish SMEs participation. We are planning for an opening ceremony of a significant representative from Seville (perhaps the Major) (or the Spanish Ministry of Industry). We think Mario?s presence would be adequate. We would like to see a possible confirmation before inviting them As usual, comments on the proposed agenda are welcomed. BR ---- Jose Jimenez Telefonica I+D jimenez at tid.es tf +34 91 4832660 De: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu [mailto:Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu] Enviado el: lunes, 17 de septiembre de 2012 8:43 Para: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO CC: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Asunto: RE: Dates for Seville review Yes, that is correct. Arian From: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO [mailto:jimenez at tid.es] Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 8:39 AM To: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Cc: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: Dates for Seville review Dear Arian Just as a point of confirmation. We understand the review to be made in Brussels do not require we send the commercial people there. We understand those people will still go to Seville. Can you confirm this, please? BR ---- Jose Jimenez Telefonica I+D jimenez at tid.es tf +34 91 4832660 De: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu [mailto:Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu] Enviado el: viernes, 14 de septiembre de 2012 18:41 Para: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; CARLOS RALLI UCENDO CC: Peter.Fatelnig at ec.europa.eu; Jesus.Villasante at ec.europa.eu; CNECT-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu Asunto: RE: Dates for Seville review Dear all, I now have the outcome of the Doodle poll with the reviewers: the only option is Nov 28-30 (and, if needed Nov 27). Given the interest with my management, we prefer Brussels as the location. I do realise this is a change from what the reviewers indicated before. As mentioned below, this gives you the freedom to plan the Seville event whenever you want, possibly taking into account the agendas of Mario, Jesus and Peter. One or two reviewers will be present as well, and the event will be fully taken into account for the M18 review. Could you please confirm date/place of the review from your side? Best regards, Arian. From: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO [mailto:jimenez at tid.es] Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 5:04 PM To: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Cc: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; CARLOS RALLI UCENDO; FATELNIG Peter (CNECT); VILLASANTE Jesus (CNECT); CNECT-ICT-285248 Subject: RE: Dates for Seville review Dear Arian Thank you very much. My only concern was to try to avoid too much travel for you and the reviewers, that need to go twice to Seville, (one of the event and again to the review). That was the reason for collocating them (of course in different dates :) but let us say event on Tuesday and review in Thursday) BR ---- Jose Jimenez Telefonica I+D jimenez at tid.es tf +34 91 4832660 De: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu [mailto:Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu] Enviado el: viernes, 14 de septiembre de 2012 12:28 Para: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO CC: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; CARLOS RALLI UCENDO; Peter.Fatelnig at ec.europa.eu; Jesus.Villasante at ec.europa.eu; CNECT-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu Asunto: RE: Dates for Seville review Dear all, Thank you very much for this initiative. We welcome the idea to organise an event around the test bed and open innovation lab of Seville, and we will make sure that the EC will be suitably represented. However, we have some doubts about combining the event with the review and the timing of both. End of October is perhaps a bit early. You have just received the review report; the consortium has just returned from holiday, and half the consortium will be working on Call 2. How realistic is it to address all points in the review report within a couple of weeks? Will there be deliverables available for the review meeting? Two weeks before the review meeting? Are you not too optimistic here? May I remind you that very clear progress needs to be shown after the "unsatisfactory" outcome of the M12 review? Furthermore, the review meeting would be just after or just before the event. It cannot be on the same day. It might be worthwhile to have 1-2 reviewers at the event, who would make a visit report that can be included in the review report, but it is not very useful to have the whole team present. It would be nice for the reviewers to see the commitment from Telefonica and perhaps others during the event, but real commitment needs to be shown via other means. Finally, I want the reviewers to have an insight into the outcome of the Call 2 evaluation when they write their review report. End of October / beginning of November is then too early. So it is better to split the event and the review. You can plan the event whenever you want, and I will see which reviewers to send. We will check Mario's and Jesus' agenda and send you their availability. The review meeting will then be later, e.g. end of November. And the review will obviously take into account the Seville event and its outcomes. Best regards, Arian. From: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO [mailto:jimenez at tid.es] Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 4:51 PM To: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Cc: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; CARLOS RALLI UCENDO; FATELNIG Peter (CNECT) Subject: RE: Dates for Seville review End of October, beginning of November BR ---- Jose Jimenez Telefonica I+D jimenez at tid.es tf +34 91 4832660 De: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu [mailto:Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu] Enviado el: jueves, 13 de septiembre de 2012 16:21 Para: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO CC: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; CARLOS RALLI UCENDO; Peter.Fatelnig at ec.europa.eu Asunto: RE: Dates for Seville review Dear Jose, What is roughly the period you had in mind for the review? I saw a G13 document mentioning FI-WARE review in October?? Best regards, Arian. From: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO [mailto:jimenez at tid.es] Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 1:21 PM To: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Cc: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; CARLOS RALLI UCENDO; FATELNIG Peter (CNECT) Subject: Dates for Seville review Dear Arian As you know, one important activity we need to perform in the next months is to show reviewers and the Commission that the test bed and open innovation lab of Seville is in good shape and that steps are taken to assure full dissemination and involvement of the business units of all involved partners To do that, we are trying to prepare an event in Seville with presence of Commercial people from Telefonica and also some politicians from Seville and Spanish government to show Telefonica and Spanish commitment. In order to be successful we would need firs of all an early indication of the exact dates for the event. Also, as I said, we want to convert Seville review into a major PPP event, with presence beyond the reviewers, including EC people, perhaps including Mario and the relevant staff from your side. We definitely think this would be a good idea, but we need early confirmation from your side. This we should use also to get backing from Concord to the activities. So I would like to get your feedback on this idea before fully involving people in the plan Thank you ---- Jose Jimenez Telefonica I+D jimenez at tid.es tf +34 91 4832660 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jimenez at tid.es Tue Sep 25 17:13:06 2012 From: jimenez at tid.es (JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 15:13:06 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] Dates for Seville review In-Reply-To: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D0BE8F8@S-DC-ESTF01-J.net1.cec.eu.int> References: <0986BE7EB220D848BEF7ADDF53B634196ABA39B694@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D0A444D@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> <0986BE7EB220D848BEF7ADDF53B634196ABA39B69E@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D0A5027@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> <0986BE7EB220D848BEF7ADDF53B634196ABA39B6AF@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D0A5A45@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D0A61BF@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D0BE8F8@S-DC-ESTF01-J.net1.cec.eu.int> Message-ID: Thank you Arian We shall scale the event down a little (no Seville Major then) For the review, the dates you suggested: Nov 28-30 (and, if needed Nov 27) Brussels, are all right for us I shall inform you about the details of Seville meeting asap, but I understand it has to be 7-8 if we want to count on you (which we certainly need to :) BR ---- Jose Jimenez Telefonica I+D jimenez at tid.es tf +34 91 4832660 De: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu [mailto:Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu] Enviado el: martes, 25 de septiembre de 2012 17:08 Para: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO CC: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; Peter.Fatelnig at ec.europa.eu; Jesus.Villasante at ec.europa.eu; Maria-Concepcion.ANTON-GARCIA at ec.europa.eu Asunto: RE: Dates for Seville review Dear Jose, I have just been informed that the hierarchy is not available that week. Peter and I will be available to attend on Nov 7 or 8. Please let us know what date you will choose. Also, please let me know the dates for the review at the end of November. Best regards, Arian. From: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 4:08 PM To: 'JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO' Cc: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; FATELNIG Peter (CNECT); VILLASANTE Jesus (CNECT) Subject: RE: Dates for Seville review Dear Jose, Just to let you know that we are checking the availability of our hierarchy to attend the Seville event. Unfortunately, this takes more time than anticipated. Some of us will be in Warsaw the next few days, so communication will be limited. Conchi will attend the Steering Board meeting in Madrid. Best regards, Arian. From: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO [mailto:jimenez at tid.es] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 2:15 PM To: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Cc: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; FATELNIG Peter (CNECT); VILLASANTE Jesus (CNECT) Subject: RE: Dates for Seville review Dear Arian I am sending to you a draft agenda for the Seville event. The best dates are in the week November 5th-8th As you can see, we are planning for a two day meeting. The first will be focused on FI-WARE and it will be followed by a second day more focused in Spanish SMEs participation. We are planning for an opening ceremony of a significant representative from Seville (perhaps the Major) (or the Spanish Ministry of Industry). We think Mario's presence would be adequate. We would like to see a possible confirmation before inviting them As usual, comments on the proposed agenda are welcomed. BR ---- Jose Jimenez Telefonica I+D jimenez at tid.es tf +34 91 4832660 De: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu [mailto:Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu] Enviado el: lunes, 17 de septiembre de 2012 8:43 Para: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO CC: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Asunto: RE: Dates for Seville review Yes, that is correct. Arian From: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO [mailto:jimenez at tid.es] Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 8:39 AM To: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Cc: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: Dates for Seville review Dear Arian Just as a point of confirmation. We understand the review to be made in Brussels do not require we send the commercial people there. We understand those people will still go to Seville. Can you confirm this, please? BR ---- Jose Jimenez Telefonica I+D jimenez at tid.es tf +34 91 4832660 De: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu [mailto:Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu] Enviado el: viernes, 14 de septiembre de 2012 18:41 Para: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; CARLOS RALLI UCENDO CC: Peter.Fatelnig at ec.europa.eu; Jesus.Villasante at ec.europa.eu; CNECT-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu Asunto: RE: Dates for Seville review Dear all, I now have the outcome of the Doodle poll with the reviewers: the only option is Nov 28-30 (and, if needed Nov 27). Given the interest with my management, we prefer Brussels as the location. I do realise this is a change from what the reviewers indicated before. As mentioned below, this gives you the freedom to plan the Seville event whenever you want, possibly taking into account the agendas of Mario, Jesus and Peter. One or two reviewers will be present as well, and the event will be fully taken into account for the M18 review. Could you please confirm date/place of the review from your side? Best regards, Arian. From: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO [mailto:jimenez at tid.es] Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 5:04 PM To: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Cc: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; CARLOS RALLI UCENDO; FATELNIG Peter (CNECT); VILLASANTE Jesus (CNECT); CNECT-ICT-285248 Subject: RE: Dates for Seville review Dear Arian Thank you very much. My only concern was to try to avoid too much travel for you and the reviewers, that need to go twice to Seville, (one of the event and again to the review). That was the reason for collocating them (of course in different dates :) but let us say event on Tuesday and review in Thursday) BR ---- Jose Jimenez Telefonica I+D jimenez at tid.es tf +34 91 4832660 De: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu [mailto:Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu] Enviado el: viernes, 14 de septiembre de 2012 12:28 Para: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO CC: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; CARLOS RALLI UCENDO; Peter.Fatelnig at ec.europa.eu; Jesus.Villasante at ec.europa.eu; CNECT-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu Asunto: RE: Dates for Seville review Dear all, Thank you very much for this initiative. We welcome the idea to organise an event around the test bed and open innovation lab of Seville, and we will make sure that the EC will be suitably represented. However, we have some doubts about combining the event with the review and the timing of both. End of October is perhaps a bit early. You have just received the review report; the consortium has just returned from holiday, and half the consortium will be working on Call 2. How realistic is it to address all points in the review report within a couple of weeks? Will there be deliverables available for the review meeting? Two weeks before the review meeting? Are you not too optimistic here? May I remind you that very clear progress needs to be shown after the "unsatisfactory" outcome of the M12 review? Furthermore, the review meeting would be just after or just before the event. It cannot be on the same day. It might be worthwhile to have 1-2 reviewers at the event, who would make a visit report that can be included in the review report, but it is not very useful to have the whole team present. It would be nice for the reviewers to see the commitment from Telefonica and perhaps others during the event, but real commitment needs to be shown via other means. Finally, I want the reviewers to have an insight into the outcome of the Call 2 evaluation when they write their review report. End of October / beginning of November is then too early. So it is better to split the event and the review. You can plan the event whenever you want, and I will see which reviewers to send. We will check Mario's and Jesus' agenda and send you their availability. The review meeting will then be later, e.g. end of November. And the review will obviously take into account the Seville event and its outcomes. Best regards, Arian. From: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO [mailto:jimenez at tid.es] Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 4:51 PM To: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Cc: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; CARLOS RALLI UCENDO; FATELNIG Peter (CNECT) Subject: RE: Dates for Seville review End of October, beginning of November BR ---- Jose Jimenez Telefonica I+D jimenez at tid.es tf +34 91 4832660 De: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu [mailto:Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu] Enviado el: jueves, 13 de septiembre de 2012 16:21 Para: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO CC: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; CARLOS RALLI UCENDO; Peter.Fatelnig at ec.europa.eu Asunto: RE: Dates for Seville review Dear Jose, What is roughly the period you had in mind for the review? I saw a G13 document mentioning FI-WARE review in October?? Best regards, Arian. From: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO [mailto:jimenez at tid.es] Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 1:21 PM To: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Cc: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; CARLOS RALLI UCENDO; FATELNIG Peter (CNECT) Subject: Dates for Seville review Dear Arian As you know, one important activity we need to perform in the next months is to show reviewers and the Commission that the test bed and open innovation lab of Seville is in good shape and that steps are taken to assure full dissemination and involvement of the business units of all involved partners To do that, we are trying to prepare an event in Seville with presence of Commercial people from Telefonica and also some politicians from Seville and Spanish government to show Telefonica and Spanish commitment. In order to be successful we would need firs of all an early indication of the exact dates for the event. Also, as I said, we want to convert Seville review into a major PPP event, with presence beyond the reviewers, including EC people, perhaps including Mario and the relevant staff from your side. We definitely think this would be a good idea, but we need early confirmation from your side. This we should use also to get backing from Concord to the activities. So I would like to get your feedback on this idea before fully involving people in the plan Thank you ---- Jose Jimenez Telefonica I+D jimenez at tid.es tf +34 91 4832660 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu Tue Sep 25 23:59:55 2012 From: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu (Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 21:59:55 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] FI-WARE: M18 review on Nov 28-29 In-Reply-To: References: <0986BE7EB220D848BEF7ADDF53B634196ABA39B694@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D0A444D@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> <0986BE7EB220D848BEF7ADDF53B634196ABA39B69E@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D0A5027@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> <0986BE7EB220D848BEF7ADDF53B634196ABA39B6AF@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D0A5A45@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D0A61BF@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D0BE8F8@S-DC-ESTF01-J.net1.cec.eu.int> Message-ID: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D0C5BBD@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> Dear Jose, Thanks for that. Then, let's put the review on Nov 28-29, Beaulieu 25, Brussels, room 0/S10. Please provide a draft agenda in due time. Best regards, Arian ________________________________ From: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO [mailto:jimenez at tid.es] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 5:13 PM To: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Cc: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; FATELNIG Peter (CNECT); VILLASANTE Jesus (CNECT); ANTON GARCIA Maria Concepcion (CNECT) Subject: RE: Dates for Seville review Thank you Arian We shall scale the event down a little (no Seville Major then) For the review, the dates you suggested: Nov 28-30 (and, if needed Nov 27) Brussels, are all right for us I shall inform you about the details of Seville meeting asap, but I understand it has to be 7-8 if we want to count on you (which we certainly need to :) BR ---- Jose Jimenez Telefonica I+D jimenez at tid.es tf +34 91 4832660 De: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu [mailto:Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu] Enviado el: martes, 25 de septiembre de 2012 17:08 Para: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO CC: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; Peter.Fatelnig at ec.europa.eu; Jesus.Villasante at ec.europa.eu; Maria-Concepcion.ANTON-GARCIA at ec.europa.eu Asunto: RE: Dates for Seville review Dear Jose, I have just been informed that the hierarchy is not available that week. Peter and I will be available to attend on Nov 7 or 8. Please let us know what date you will choose. Also, please let me know the dates for the review at the end of November. Best regards, Arian. From: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 4:08 PM To: 'JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO' Cc: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; FATELNIG Peter (CNECT); VILLASANTE Jesus (CNECT) Subject: RE: Dates for Seville review Dear Jose, Just to let you know that we are checking the availability of our hierarchy to attend the Seville event. Unfortunately, this takes more time than anticipated. Some of us will be in Warsaw the next few days, so communication will be limited. Conchi will attend the Steering Board meeting in Madrid. Best regards, Arian. From: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO [mailto:jimenez at tid.es] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 2:15 PM To: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Cc: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; FATELNIG Peter (CNECT); VILLASANTE Jesus (CNECT) Subject: RE: Dates for Seville review Dear Arian I am sending to you a draft agenda for the Seville event. The best dates are in the week November 5th-8th As you can see, we are planning for a two day meeting. The first will be focused on FI-WARE and it will be followed by a second day more focused in Spanish SMEs participation. We are planning for an opening ceremony of a significant representative from Seville (perhaps the Major) (or the Spanish Ministry of Industry). We think Mario?s presence would be adequate. We would like to see a possible confirmation before inviting them As usual, comments on the proposed agenda are welcomed. BR ---- Jose Jimenez Telefonica I+D jimenez at tid.es tf +34 91 4832660 De: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu [mailto:Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu] Enviado el: lunes, 17 de septiembre de 2012 8:43 Para: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO CC: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Asunto: RE: Dates for Seville review Yes, that is correct. Arian From: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO [mailto:jimenez at tid.es] Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 8:39 AM To: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Cc: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: Dates for Seville review Dear Arian Just as a point of confirmation. We understand the review to be made in Brussels do not require we send the commercial people there. We understand those people will still go to Seville. Can you confirm this, please? BR ---- Jose Jimenez Telefonica I+D jimenez at tid.es tf +34 91 4832660 De: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu [mailto:Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu] Enviado el: viernes, 14 de septiembre de 2012 18:41 Para: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; CARLOS RALLI UCENDO CC: Peter.Fatelnig at ec.europa.eu; Jesus.Villasante at ec.europa.eu; CNECT-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu Asunto: RE: Dates for Seville review Dear all, I now have the outcome of the Doodle poll with the reviewers: the only option is Nov 28-30 (and, if needed Nov 27). Given the interest with my management, we prefer Brussels as the location. I do realise this is a change from what the reviewers indicated before. As mentioned below, this gives you the freedom to plan the Seville event whenever you want, possibly taking into account the agendas of Mario, Jesus and Peter. One or two reviewers will be present as well, and the event will be fully taken into account for the M18 review. Could you please confirm date/place of the review from your side? Best regards, Arian. From: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO [mailto:jimenez at tid.es] Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 5:04 PM To: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Cc: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; CARLOS RALLI UCENDO; FATELNIG Peter (CNECT); VILLASANTE Jesus (CNECT); CNECT-ICT-285248 Subject: RE: Dates for Seville review Dear Arian Thank you very much. My only concern was to try to avoid too much travel for you and the reviewers, that need to go twice to Seville, (one of the event and again to the review). That was the reason for collocating them (of course in different dates :) but let us say event on Tuesday and review in Thursday) BR ---- Jose Jimenez Telefonica I+D jimenez at tid.es tf +34 91 4832660 De: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu [mailto:Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu] Enviado el: viernes, 14 de septiembre de 2012 12:28 Para: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO CC: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; CARLOS RALLI UCENDO; Peter.Fatelnig at ec.europa.eu; Jesus.Villasante at ec.europa.eu; CNECT-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu Asunto: RE: Dates for Seville review Dear all, Thank you very much for this initiative. We welcome the idea to organise an event around the test bed and open innovation lab of Seville, and we will make sure that the EC will be suitably represented. However, we have some doubts about combining the event with the review and the timing of both. End of October is perhaps a bit early. You have just received the review report; the consortium has just returned from holiday, and half the consortium will be working on Call 2. How realistic is it to address all points in the review report within a couple of weeks? Will there be deliverables available for the review meeting? Two weeks before the review meeting? Are you not too optimistic here? May I remind you that very clear progress needs to be shown after the "unsatisfactory" outcome of the M12 review? Furthermore, the review meeting would be just after or just before the event. It cannot be on the same day. It might be worthwhile to have 1-2 reviewers at the event, who would make a visit report that can be included in the review report, but it is not very useful to have the whole team present. It would be nice for the reviewers to see the commitment from Telefonica and perhaps others during the event, but real commitment needs to be shown via other means. Finally, I want the reviewers to have an insight into the outcome of the Call 2 evaluation when they write their review report. End of October / beginning of November is then too early. So it is better to split the event and the review. You can plan the event whenever you want, and I will see which reviewers to send. We will check Mario's and Jesus' agenda and send you their availability. The review meeting will then be later, e.g. end of November. And the review will obviously take into account the Seville event and its outcomes. Best regards, Arian. From: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO [mailto:jimenez at tid.es] Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 4:51 PM To: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Cc: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; CARLOS RALLI UCENDO; FATELNIG Peter (CNECT) Subject: RE: Dates for Seville review End of October, beginning of November BR ---- Jose Jimenez Telefonica I+D jimenez at tid.es tf +34 91 4832660 De: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu [mailto:Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu] Enviado el: jueves, 13 de septiembre de 2012 16:21 Para: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO CC: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; CARLOS RALLI UCENDO; Peter.Fatelnig at ec.europa.eu Asunto: RE: Dates for Seville review Dear Jose, What is roughly the period you had in mind for the review? I saw a G13 document mentioning FI-WARE review in October?? Best regards, Arian. From: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO [mailto:jimenez at tid.es] Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 1:21 PM To: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Cc: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; CARLOS RALLI UCENDO; FATELNIG Peter (CNECT) Subject: Dates for Seville review Dear Arian As you know, one important activity we need to perform in the next months is to show reviewers and the Commission that the test bed and open innovation lab of Seville is in good shape and that steps are taken to assure full dissemination and involvement of the business units of all involved partners To do that, we are trying to prepare an event in Seville with presence of Commercial people from Telefonica and also some politicians from Seville and Spanish government to show Telefonica and Spanish commitment. In order to be successful we would need firs of all an early indication of the exact dates for the event. Also, as I said, we want to convert Seville review into a major PPP event, with presence beyond the reviewers, including EC people, perhaps including Mario and the relevant staff from your side. We definitely think this would be a good idea, but we need early confirmation from your side. This we should use also to get backing from Concord to the activities. So I would like to get your feedback on this idea before fully involving people in the plan Thank you ---- Jose Jimenez Telefonica I+D jimenez at tid.es tf +34 91 4832660 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Wed Sep 26 00:37:49 2012 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 00:37:49 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] FI-WARE: M18 review on Nov 28-29 In-Reply-To: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D0C5BBD@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> References: <0986BE7EB220D848BEF7ADDF53B634196ABA39B694@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D0A444D@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> <0986BE7EB220D848BEF7ADDF53B634196ABA39B69E@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D0A5027@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> <0986BE7EB220D848BEF7ADDF53B634196ABA39B6AF@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D0A5A45@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D0A61BF@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D0BE8F8@S-DC-ESTF01-J.net1.cec.eu.int> <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D0C5BBD@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> Message-ID: dear jose, i guess at this point to have the rehearsal on 26-27 (i believe two full days are really needed as this review it is absolutely critical) and cancel the 30 unless we want to have a f2f debriefing. ciao, stefano 2012/9/25 > ** > Dear Jose, > > Thanks for that. > > Then, let's put the review on Nov 28-29, Beaulieu 25, Brussels, room > 0/S10. > Please provide a draft agenda in due time. > > Best regards, > Arian > > ------------------------------ > *From:* JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO [mailto:jimenez at tid.es] > *Sent:* Tuesday, September 25, 2012 5:13 PM > *To:* ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) > *Cc:* fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; FATELNIG Peter (CNECT); VILLASANTE > Jesus (CNECT); ANTON GARCIA Maria Concepcion (CNECT) > *Subject:* RE: Dates for Seville review > > Thank you Arian > > > > We shall scale the event down a little (no Seville Major then) > > > > For the review, the dates you suggested: Nov 28-30 (and, if needed Nov > 27) Brussels, are all right for us > > > > I shall inform you about the details of Seville meeting asap, but I > understand it has to be 7-8 if we want to count on you (which we certainly > need to J > > > > > > BR > > > > > > > > > > ---- > > > > Jose Jimenez > > Telefonica I+D > > jimenez at tid.es > > tf +34 91 4832660 > > > > > > *De:* Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu [mailto:Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu] > *Enviado el:* martes, 25 de septiembre de 2012 17:08 > *Para:* JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO > *CC:* fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; Peter.Fatelnig at ec.europa.eu; > Jesus.Villasante at ec.europa.eu; Maria-Concepcion.ANTON-GARCIA at ec.europa.eu > *Asunto:* RE: Dates for Seville review > > > > Dear Jose, > > > > I have just been informed that the hierarchy is not available that week. > > Peter and I will be available to attend on Nov 7 or 8. > > > > Please let us know what date you will choose. > > Also, please let me know the dates for the review at the end of November. > > > > Best regards, > > Arian. > > > > *From:* ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) > *Sent:* Tuesday, September 25, 2012 4:08 PM > *To:* 'JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO' > *Cc:* fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; FATELNIG Peter (CNECT); VILLASANTE > Jesus (CNECT) > *Subject:* RE: Dates for Seville review > > > > Dear Jose, > > > > Just to let you know that we are checking the availability of our > hierarchy to attend the Seville event. > > Unfortunately, this takes more time than anticipated. > > > > Some of us will be in Warsaw the next few days, so communication will be > limited. Conchi will attend the Steering Board meeting in Madrid. > > > > Best regards, > > Arian. > > > > *From:* JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO [mailto:jimenez at tid.es ] > *Sent:* Wednesday, September 19, 2012 2:15 PM > *To:* ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) > *Cc:* fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; FATELNIG Peter (CNECT); VILLASANTE > Jesus (CNECT) > *Subject:* RE: Dates for Seville review > > > > Dear Arian > > > > > > I am sending to you a draft agenda for the Seville event. The best dates > are in the week November 5th-8th > > > > As you can see, we are planning for a two day meeting. The first will be > focused on FI-WARE and it will be followed by a second day more focused in > Spanish SMEs participation. > > > > We are planning for an opening ceremony of a significant representative > from Seville (perhaps the Major) (or the Spanish Ministry of Industry). We > think Mario?s presence would be adequate. We would like to see a possible > confirmation before inviting them > > > > As usual, comments on the proposed agenda are welcomed. > > > > BR > > > > > > > > ---- > > > > Jose Jimenez > > Telefonica I+D > > jimenez at tid.es > > tf +34 91 4832660 > > > > > > *De:* Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu [mailto:Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu] > > *Enviado el:* lunes, 17 de septiembre de 2012 8:43 > *Para:* JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO > *CC:* fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu > *Asunto:* RE: Dates for Seville review > > > > Yes, that is correct. > > Arian > > > > *From:* JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO [mailto:jimenez at tid.es ] > *Sent:* Monday, September 17, 2012 8:39 AM > *To:* ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) > *Cc:* fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu > *Subject:* RE: Dates for Seville review > > > > Dear Arian > > > > Just as a point of confirmation. We understand the review to be made in > Brussels do not require we send the commercial people there. We understand > those people will still go to Seville. > > > > Can you confirm this, please? > > > > BR > > > > > > ---- > > > > Jose Jimenez > > Telefonica I+D > > jimenez at tid.es > > tf +34 91 4832660 > > > > > > *De:* Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu [mailto:Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu] > > *Enviado el:* viernes, 14 de septiembre de 2012 18:41 > *Para:* JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; CARLOS RALLI UCENDO > *CC:* Peter.Fatelnig at ec.europa.eu; Jesus.Villasante at ec.europa.eu; > CNECT-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu > *Asunto:* RE: Dates for Seville review > > > > Dear all, > > > > I now have the outcome of the Doodle poll with the reviewers: the only > option is Nov 28-30 (and, if needed Nov 27). > > Given the interest with my management, we prefer Brussels as the location. > I do realise this is a change from what the reviewers indicated before. > > > > As mentioned below, this gives you the freedom to plan the Seville event > whenever you want, possibly taking into account the agendas of Mario, Jesus > and Peter. One or two reviewers will be present as well, and the event will > be fully taken into account for the M18 review. > > > > Could you please confirm date/place of the review from your side? > > > > Best regards, > > Arian. > > > > > > *From:* JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO [mailto:jimenez at tid.es ] > *Sent:* Friday, September 14, 2012 5:04 PM > *To:* ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) > *Cc:* JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; CARLOS RALLI UCENDO; FATELNIG Peter > (CNECT); VILLASANTE Jesus (CNECT); CNECT-ICT-285248 > *Subject:* RE: Dates for Seville review > > > > Dear Arian > > > > Thank you very much. > > > > My only concern was to try to avoid too much travel for you and the > reviewers, that need to go twice to Seville, (one of the event and again to > the review). That was the reason for collocating them (of course in > different dates J but let us say event on Tuesday and review in Thursday) > > > > BR > > > > > > > > > > ---- > > > > Jose Jimenez > > Telefonica I+D > > jimenez at tid.es > > tf +34 91 4832660 > > > > > > *De:* Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu [mailto:Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu] > > *Enviado el:* viernes, 14 de septiembre de 2012 12:28 > *Para:* JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO > *CC:* JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; CARLOS RALLI UCENDO; > Peter.Fatelnig at ec.europa.eu; Jesus.Villasante at ec.europa.eu; > CNECT-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu > *Asunto:* RE: Dates for Seville review > > > > Dear all, > > > > Thank you very much for this initiative. We welcome the idea to organise > an event around the test bed and open innovation lab of Seville, and we > will make sure that the EC will be suitably represented. > > > > However, we have some doubts about combining the event with the review and > the timing of both. > > > > End of October is perhaps a bit early. You have just received the review > report; the consortium has just returned from holiday, and half the > consortium will be working on Call 2. How realistic is it to address all > points in the review report within a couple of weeks? Will there be > deliverables available for the review meeting? Two weeks before the review > meeting? Are you not too optimistic here? May I remind you that very clear > progress needs to be shown after the "unsatisfactory" outcome of the M12 > review? > > > > Furthermore, the review meeting would be just after or just before the > event. It cannot be on the same day. It might be worthwhile to have 1-2 > reviewers at the event, who would make a visit report that can be included > in the review report, but it is not very useful to have the whole team > present. It would be nice for the reviewers to see the commitment from > Telefonica and perhaps others during the event, but real commitment needs > to be shown via other means. > > > > Finally, I want the reviewers to have an insight into the outcome of the > Call 2 evaluation when they write their review report. End of October / > beginning of November is then too early. > > > > So it is better to split the event and the review. You can plan the event > whenever you want, and I will see which reviewers to send. We will check > Mario's and Jesus' agenda and send you their availability. > > The review meeting will then be later, e.g. end of November. And the > review will obviously take into account the Seville event and its outcomes. > > > > Best regards, > > Arian. > > > > > > > > *From:* JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO [mailto:jimenez at tid.es ] > *Sent:* Thursday, September 13, 2012 4:51 PM > *To:* ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) > *Cc:* JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; CARLOS RALLI UCENDO; FATELNIG Peter (CNECT) > *Subject:* RE: Dates for Seville review > > > > End of October, beginning of November > > > > BR > > > > > > ---- > > > > Jose Jimenez > > Telefonica I+D > > jimenez at tid.es > > tf +34 91 4832660 > > > > > > *De:* Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu [mailto:Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu] > > *Enviado el:* jueves, 13 de septiembre de 2012 16:21 > *Para:* JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO > *CC:* JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; CARLOS RALLI UCENDO; > Peter.Fatelnig at ec.europa.eu > *Asunto:* RE: Dates for Seville review > > > > Dear Jose, > > > > What is roughly the period you had in mind for the review? > > I saw a G13 document mentioning FI-WARE review in October?? > > > > Best regards, > > Arian. > > > > *From:* JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO [mailto:jimenez at tid.es ] > *Sent:* Thursday, September 13, 2012 1:21 PM > *To:* ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) > *Cc:* JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; CARLOS RALLI UCENDO; FATELNIG Peter (CNECT) > *Subject:* Dates for Seville review > > > > Dear Arian > > > > As you know, one important activity we need to perform in the next months > is to show reviewers and the Commission that the test bed and open > innovation lab of Seville is in good shape and that steps are taken to > assure full dissemination and involvement of the business units of all > involved partners > > > > To do that, we are trying to prepare an event in Seville with presence of > Commercial people from Telefonica and also some politicians from Seville > and Spanish government to show Telefonica and Spanish commitment. In order > to be successful we would need firs of all an early indication of the *exact > dates for the event.* > > > > Also, as I said, we want to convert Seville review into a major PPP event, > with presence beyond the reviewers, including EC people, perhaps including > Mario and the relevant staff from your side. We definitely think this would > be a good idea, but we need early confirmation from your side. This we > should use also to get backing from Concord to the activities. So I would > like to get your feedback on this idea before fully involving people in the > plan > > > > Thank you > > > > > > ---- > > > > Jose Jimenez > > Telefonica I+D > > jimenez at tid.es > > tf +34 91 4832660 > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace > situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > > ------------------------------ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace > situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > > ------------------------------ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace > situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > > ------------------------------ > > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace > situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > > ------------------------------ > > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace > situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > ------------------------------ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace > situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-pcc mailing list > Fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-pcc > > -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jimenez at tid.es Wed Sep 26 08:03:28 2012 From: jimenez at tid.es (JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 06:03:28 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] FI-WARE: M18 review on Nov 28-29 In-Reply-To: References: <0986BE7EB220D848BEF7ADDF53B634196ABA39B694@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D0A444D@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> <0986BE7EB220D848BEF7ADDF53B634196ABA39B69E@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D0A5027@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> <0986BE7EB220D848BEF7ADDF53B634196ABA39B6AF@EXCLU2K7.hi.inet> <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D0A5A45@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D0A61BF@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D0BE8F8@S-DC-ESTF01-J.net1.cec.eu.int> <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D0C5BBD@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> Message-ID: Dear Stefano Sounds very reasonable. Could you please, all WPL, reserve the dates as Stefano suggests?. We shall try to have our meeting in Telefonica premises if available BR ---- Jose Jimenez Telefonica I+D jimenez at tid.es tf +34 91 4832660 De: ste.depanfilis at gmail.com [mailto:ste.depanfilis at gmail.com] En nombre de stefano de panfilis Enviado el: mi?rcoles, 26 de septiembre de 2012 0:38 Para: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO; fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Asunto: Re: [Fiware-pcc] FI-WARE: M18 review on Nov 28-29 dear jose, i guess at this point to have the rehearsal on 26-27 (i believe two full days are really needed as this review it is absolutely critical) and cancel the 30 unless we want to have a f2f debriefing. ciao, stefano 2012/9/25 > Dear Jose, Thanks for that. Then, let's put the review on Nov 28-29, Beaulieu 25, Brussels, room 0/S10. Please provide a draft agenda in due time. Best regards, Arian ________________________________ From: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO [mailto:jimenez at tid.es] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 5:13 PM To: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Cc: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; FATELNIG Peter (CNECT); VILLASANTE Jesus (CNECT); ANTON GARCIA Maria Concepcion (CNECT) Subject: RE: Dates for Seville review Thank you Arian We shall scale the event down a little (no Seville Major then) For the review, the dates you suggested: Nov 28-30 (and, if needed Nov 27) Brussels, are all right for us I shall inform you about the details of Seville meeting asap, but I understand it has to be 7-8 if we want to count on you (which we certainly need to :) BR ---- Jose Jimenez Telefonica I+D jimenez at tid.es tf +34 91 4832660 De: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu [mailto:Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu] Enviado el: martes, 25 de septiembre de 2012 17:08 Para: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO CC: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; Peter.Fatelnig at ec.europa.eu; Jesus.Villasante at ec.europa.eu; Maria-Concepcion.ANTON-GARCIA at ec.europa.eu Asunto: RE: Dates for Seville review Dear Jose, I have just been informed that the hierarchy is not available that week. Peter and I will be available to attend on Nov 7 or 8. Please let us know what date you will choose. Also, please let me know the dates for the review at the end of November. Best regards, Arian. From: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 4:08 PM To: 'JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO' Cc: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; FATELNIG Peter (CNECT); VILLASANTE Jesus (CNECT) Subject: RE: Dates for Seville review Dear Jose, Just to let you know that we are checking the availability of our hierarchy to attend the Seville event. Unfortunately, this takes more time than anticipated. Some of us will be in Warsaw the next few days, so communication will be limited. Conchi will attend the Steering Board meeting in Madrid. Best regards, Arian. From: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO [mailto:jimenez at tid.es] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 2:15 PM To: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Cc: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; FATELNIG Peter (CNECT); VILLASANTE Jesus (CNECT) Subject: RE: Dates for Seville review Dear Arian I am sending to you a draft agenda for the Seville event. The best dates are in the week November 5th-8th As you can see, we are planning for a two day meeting. The first will be focused on FI-WARE and it will be followed by a second day more focused in Spanish SMEs participation. We are planning for an opening ceremony of a significant representative from Seville (perhaps the Major) (or the Spanish Ministry of Industry). We think Mario's presence would be adequate. We would like to see a possible confirmation before inviting them As usual, comments on the proposed agenda are welcomed. BR ---- Jose Jimenez Telefonica I+D jimenez at tid.es tf +34 91 4832660 De: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu [mailto:Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu] Enviado el: lunes, 17 de septiembre de 2012 8:43 Para: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO CC: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Asunto: RE: Dates for Seville review Yes, that is correct. Arian From: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO [mailto:jimenez at tid.es] Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 8:39 AM To: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Cc: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: Dates for Seville review Dear Arian Just as a point of confirmation. We understand the review to be made in Brussels do not require we send the commercial people there. We understand those people will still go to Seville. Can you confirm this, please? BR ---- Jose Jimenez Telefonica I+D jimenez at tid.es tf +34 91 4832660 De: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu [mailto:Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu] Enviado el: viernes, 14 de septiembre de 2012 18:41 Para: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; CARLOS RALLI UCENDO CC: Peter.Fatelnig at ec.europa.eu; Jesus.Villasante at ec.europa.eu; CNECT-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu Asunto: RE: Dates for Seville review Dear all, I now have the outcome of the Doodle poll with the reviewers: the only option is Nov 28-30 (and, if needed Nov 27). Given the interest with my management, we prefer Brussels as the location. I do realise this is a change from what the reviewers indicated before. As mentioned below, this gives you the freedom to plan the Seville event whenever you want, possibly taking into account the agendas of Mario, Jesus and Peter. One or two reviewers will be present as well, and the event will be fully taken into account for the M18 review. Could you please confirm date/place of the review from your side? Best regards, Arian. From: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO [mailto:jimenez at tid.es] Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 5:04 PM To: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Cc: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; CARLOS RALLI UCENDO; FATELNIG Peter (CNECT); VILLASANTE Jesus (CNECT); CNECT-ICT-285248 Subject: RE: Dates for Seville review Dear Arian Thank you very much. My only concern was to try to avoid too much travel for you and the reviewers, that need to go twice to Seville, (one of the event and again to the review). That was the reason for collocating them (of course in different dates :) but let us say event on Tuesday and review in Thursday) BR ---- Jose Jimenez Telefonica I+D jimenez at tid.es tf +34 91 4832660 De: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu [mailto:Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu] Enviado el: viernes, 14 de septiembre de 2012 12:28 Para: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO CC: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; CARLOS RALLI UCENDO; Peter.Fatelnig at ec.europa.eu; Jesus.Villasante at ec.europa.eu; CNECT-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu Asunto: RE: Dates for Seville review Dear all, Thank you very much for this initiative. We welcome the idea to organise an event around the test bed and open innovation lab of Seville, and we will make sure that the EC will be suitably represented. However, we have some doubts about combining the event with the review and the timing of both. End of October is perhaps a bit early. You have just received the review report; the consortium has just returned from holiday, and half the consortium will be working on Call 2. How realistic is it to address all points in the review report within a couple of weeks? Will there be deliverables available for the review meeting? Two weeks before the review meeting? Are you not too optimistic here? May I remind you that very clear progress needs to be shown after the "unsatisfactory" outcome of the M12 review? Furthermore, the review meeting would be just after or just before the event. It cannot be on the same day. It might be worthwhile to have 1-2 reviewers at the event, who would make a visit report that can be included in the review report, but it is not very useful to have the whole team present. It would be nice for the reviewers to see the commitment from Telefonica and perhaps others during the event, but real commitment needs to be shown via other means. Finally, I want the reviewers to have an insight into the outcome of the Call 2 evaluation when they write their review report. End of October / beginning of November is then too early. So it is better to split the event and the review. You can plan the event whenever you want, and I will see which reviewers to send. We will check Mario's and Jesus' agenda and send you their availability. The review meeting will then be later, e.g. end of November. And the review will obviously take into account the Seville event and its outcomes. Best regards, Arian. From: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO [mailto:jimenez at tid.es] Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 4:51 PM To: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Cc: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; CARLOS RALLI UCENDO; FATELNIG Peter (CNECT) Subject: RE: Dates for Seville review End of October, beginning of November BR ---- Jose Jimenez Telefonica I+D jimenez at tid.es tf +34 91 4832660 De: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu [mailto:Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu] Enviado el: jueves, 13 de septiembre de 2012 16:21 Para: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO CC: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; CARLOS RALLI UCENDO; Peter.Fatelnig at ec.europa.eu Asunto: RE: Dates for Seville review Dear Jose, What is roughly the period you had in mind for the review? I saw a G13 document mentioning FI-WARE review in October?? Best regards, Arian. From: JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO [mailto:jimenez at tid.es] Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 1:21 PM To: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Cc: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; CARLOS RALLI UCENDO; FATELNIG Peter (CNECT) Subject: Dates for Seville review Dear Arian As you know, one important activity we need to perform in the next months is to show reviewers and the Commission that the test bed and open innovation lab of Seville is in good shape and that steps are taken to assure full dissemination and involvement of the business units of all involved partners To do that, we are trying to prepare an event in Seville with presence of Commercial people from Telefonica and also some politicians from Seville and Spanish government to show Telefonica and Spanish commitment. In order to be successful we would need firs of all an early indication of the exact dates for the event. Also, as I said, we want to convert Seville review into a major PPP event, with presence beyond the reviewers, including EC people, perhaps including Mario and the relevant staff from your side. We definitely think this would be a good idea, but we need early confirmation from your side. This we should use also to get backing from Concord to the activities. So I would like to get your feedback on this idea before fully involving people in the plan Thank you ---- Jose Jimenez Telefonica I+D jimenez at tid.es tf +34 91 4832660 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-pcc mailing list Fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-pcc -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jimenez at tid.es Wed Sep 26 08:34:42 2012 From: jimenez at tid.es (JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 06:34:42 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] Statements of conditions Message-ID: Dear PCC According to the decisions of the audio conference last September 19th, I am sending to you a first draft of the table stating the conditions for releasing FI-WARE elements during and after the trials (as requested by the EC) Our plan is to distribute it to the whole project (GA) after your final approval. If you have any major suggestion, please let me know before next Friday The document is https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Asksuam5cM-YdGxJOXJidjI2bjJMTC1KQWNnb2FDWmc#gid=0 I prefer to use a google sheet to allow common edition. Since this is to become a public document, I do not think we need to worry too much about confidentiality issues BR ---- Jose Jimenez Telefonica I+D jimenez at tid.es tf +34 91 4832660 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From axel.fasse at sap.com Thu Sep 27 10:23:24 2012 From: axel.fasse at sap.com (Fasse, Axel) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 10:23:24 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] Some important topics from my side Message-ID: <2C6296E1876B5C49962495FDACDC7A63616FF4277D@DEWDFECCR01.wdf.sap.corp> Dear PCC colleagues, because of the fact that I will be on vacation for three weeks (1-19.10.2012) I will be replaced by Uwe Riss (uwe.riss at sap.com ) during this time. Please add his name (mail-address) to the mailing-list and inform him if there are topics that he should have a look at. If you think that there is a need for a sync-meeting with me and Uwe before my vacation, please feel free to contact us directly (please don't forget to invite Uwe Riss). Beside this, I have seen a mail that explains that the "Open-Innovation-Lab" in Seville is in a good shape, from my point of view maybe I am wrong - we do not have officially agreed to "start" this Open-Innovation-Lab so far, because there is - so far as I know - no legal framework that allows us to invite third-parties to use our Software (GE's) within an open (non PPP) context. Because of the fact that we are forced to solve this issue (an Open-innovation-Lab is for sure a good idea), I would suggest to add this topic to the agenda of the "Legal-Task-Force group". Beside this, I actually do not have a good overview about the topics "single legal notice". For both of the topics we should find a proper answer before our next review meeting. Otherwise we might run into problems with respect to the expectations of the reviewers and the commission. Best regards, Axel --------------------------- Axel Fasse Senior Researcher SAP Research Karlsruhe SAP AG Vincenz-Priessnitz-Strasse 1 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany T +49 6227 7-52528 F +49 6227 78-55237 M +4915153858917 E axel.fasse at sap.com www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Thu Sep 27 11:01:01 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 11:01:01 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] Some important topics from my side In-Reply-To: <2C6296E1876B5C49962495FDACDC7A63616FF4277D@DEWDFECCR01.wdf.sap.corp> References: <2C6296E1876B5C49962495FDACDC7A63616FF4277D@DEWDFECCR01.wdf.sap.corp> Message-ID: <506415CD.4090002@tid.es> On 27/09/12 10:23, Fasse, Axel wrote: Dear PCC colleagues, because of the fact that I will be on vacation for three weeks (1-19.10.2012) I will be replaced by Uwe Riss (uwe.riss at sap.com ) during this time. Please add his name (mail-address) to the mailing-list and inform him if there are topics that he should have a look at. Done. Hope he receives also this message. If you think that there is a need for a sync-meeting with me and Uwe before my vacation, please feel free to contact us directly (please don't forget to invite Uwe Riss). Beside this, I have seen a mail that explains that the "Open-Innovation-Lab" in Seville is in a good shape, from my point of view maybe I am wrong - we do not have officially agreed to "start" this Open-Innovation-Lab so far, because there is - so far as I know - no legal framework that allows us to invite third-parties to use our Software (GE's) within an open (non PPP) context. I guess whoever was talking about the matter was referring to the FI-WARE Testbed. Note that the FI-WARE Open Innovation Lab will mostly be the result of offering the FI-WARE Testbed to third parties. This was scheduled to happen together with delivery of the FI-WARE 2nd Release, although I believe it would not be a bad idea to make it as soon as we agree there is already a comprehensive and relatively set of FI-WARE GEs available (imho, we are still far from that). Of course, we need to define the terms and conditions for usage of FI-WARE GEs in that Open Innovation Lab before launching it, as you say. Because of the fact that we are forced to solve this issue (an Open-innovation-Lab is for sure a good idea), I would suggest to add this topic to the agenda of the "Legal-Task-Force group". Beside this, I actually do not have a good overview about the topics "single legal notice". This is fine, but I would also like to remind you that we asked SAP to provide a first draft of the legal terms and conditions that would apply to such FI-WARE Open Innovation Lab. Someone has to provide such a first draft so that we can start rolling-out the discussion within the FI-WARE Legal Task-Force group. This request, I remind you, comes from before this summer. Don't take me wrong, we are all very busy, so maybe you forgot and I can understand it, so let's reactivate it ... Could SAP confirm they could provide such first draft ? Or at least say "no" so that we don't keep waiting. For both of the topics we should find a proper answer before our next review meeting. Otherwise we might run into problems with respect to the expectations of the reviewers and the commission. Waiting for your answer. Thanks, -- Juanjo Best regards, Axel --------------------------- Axel Fasse Senior Researcher SAP Research Karlsruhe SAP AG Vincenz-Priessnitz-Strasse 1 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany T +49 6227 7-52528 F +49 6227 78-55237 M +4915153858917 E axel.fasse at sap.com www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. _______________________________________________ Fiware-pcc mailing list Fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-pcc ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From axel.fasse at sap.com Thu Sep 27 17:28:27 2012 From: axel.fasse at sap.com (Fasse, Axel) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 17:28:27 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] Some important topics from my side In-Reply-To: <506415CD.4090002@tid.es> References: <2C6296E1876B5C49962495FDACDC7A63616FF4277D@DEWDFECCR01.wdf.sap.corp> <506415CD.4090002@tid.es> Message-ID: <2C6296E1876B5C49962495FDACDC7A63617001EF29@DEWDFECCR01.wdf.sap.corp> Dear Juanjo, thank you for your response. I have made some comments within the "original text". Best regards, Axel From: fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juanjo Hierro Sent: Donnerstag, 27. September 2012 11:01 To: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-pcc] Some important topics from my side On 27/09/12 10:23, Fasse, Axel wrote: Dear PCC colleagues, because of the fact that I will be on vacation for three weeks (1-19.10.2012) I will be replaced by Uwe Riss (uwe.riss at sap.com ) during this time. Please add his name (mail-address) to the mailing-list and inform him if there are topics that he should have a look at. Done. Hope he receives also this message. If you think that there is a need for a sync-meeting with me and Uwe before my vacation, please feel free to contact us directly (please don't forget to invite Uwe Riss). Beside this, I have seen a mail that explains that the "Open-Innovation-Lab" in Seville is in a good shape, from my point of view maybe I am wrong - we do not have officially agreed to "start" this Open-Innovation-Lab so far, because there is - so far as I know - no legal framework that allows us to invite third-parties to use our Software (GE's) within an open (non PPP) context. I guess whoever was talking about the matter was referring to the FI-WARE Testbed. Note that the FI-WARE Open Innovation Lab will mostly be the result of offering the FI-WARE Testbed to third parties. This was scheduled to happen together with delivery of the FI-WARE 2nd Release, although I believe it would not be a bad idea to make it as soon as we agree there is already a comprehensive and relatively set of FI-WARE GEs available (imho, we are still far from that). Of course, we need to define the terms and conditions for usage of FI-WARE GEs in that Open Innovation Lab before launching it, as you say. You are right, but maybe we could take care about the "right" wording within our communication with the EU and external partners. That might help to avoid any mis-interpreation and lead to the right expectations. To start the planning for the Open-Innovation-Lab is a good idea. Because of the fact that we are forced to solve this issue (an Open-innovation-Lab is for sure a good idea), I would suggest to add this topic to the agenda of the "Legal-Task-Force group". Beside this, I actually do not have a good overview about the topics "single legal notice". This is fine, but I would also like to remind you that we asked SAP to provide a first draft of the legal terms and conditions that would apply to such FI-WARE Open Innovation Lab. Someone has to provide such a first draft so that we can start rolling-out the discussion within the FI-WARE Legal Task-Force group. This request, I remind you, comes from before this summer. Don't take me wrong, we are all very busy, so maybe you forgot and I can understand it, so let's reactivate it ... Could SAP confirm they could provide such first draft ? Or at least say "no" so that we don't keep waiting. I would expect there is a small misunderstanding with respect to the responsibilities. But I will ask our colleagues if they are able to provide the first draft. For both of the topics we should find a proper answer before our next review meeting. Otherwise we might run into problems with respect to the expectations of the reviewers and the commission. Waiting for your answer. Thanks, -- Juanjo Best regards, Axel --------------------------- Axel Fasse Senior Researcher SAP Research Karlsruhe SAP AG Vincenz-Priessnitz-Strasse 1 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany T +49 6227 7-52528 F +49 6227 78-55237 M +4915153858917 E axel.fasse at sap.com www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. _______________________________________________ Fiware-pcc mailing list Fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-pcc ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From axel.fasse at sap.com Thu Sep 27 17:44:57 2012 From: axel.fasse at sap.com (Fasse, Axel) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 17:44:57 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] Some important topics from my side In-Reply-To: <506415CD.4090002@tid.es> References: <2C6296E1876B5C49962495FDACDC7A63616FF4277D@DEWDFECCR01.wdf.sap.corp> <506415CD.4090002@tid.es> Message-ID: <2C6296E1876B5C49962495FDACDC7A63617001EF68@DEWDFECCR01.wdf.sap.corp> Hallo Juanjo, it would be very helpful if you can also send out this PCC Mails to Uwe Riss. Gru? Axel From: fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juanjo Hierro Sent: Donnerstag, 27. September 2012 11:01 To: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-pcc] Some important topics from my side On 27/09/12 10:23, Fasse, Axel wrote: Dear PCC colleagues, because of the fact that I will be on vacation for three weeks (1-19.10.2012) I will be replaced by Uwe Riss (uwe.riss at sap.com ) during this time. Please add his name (mail-address) to the mailing-list and inform him if there are topics that he should have a look at. Done. Hope he receives also this message. If you think that there is a need for a sync-meeting with me and Uwe before my vacation, please feel free to contact us directly (please don't forget to invite Uwe Riss). Beside this, I have seen a mail that explains that the "Open-Innovation-Lab" in Seville is in a good shape, from my point of view maybe I am wrong - we do not have officially agreed to "start" this Open-Innovation-Lab so far, because there is - so far as I know - no legal framework that allows us to invite third-parties to use our Software (GE's) within an open (non PPP) context. I guess whoever was talking about the matter was referring to the FI-WARE Testbed. Note that the FI-WARE Open Innovation Lab will mostly be the result of offering the FI-WARE Testbed to third parties. This was scheduled to happen together with delivery of the FI-WARE 2nd Release, although I believe it would not be a bad idea to make it as soon as we agree there is already a comprehensive and relatively set of FI-WARE GEs available (imho, we are still far from that). Of course, we need to define the terms and conditions for usage of FI-WARE GEs in that Open Innovation Lab before launching it, as you say. Because of the fact that we are forced to solve this issue (an Open-innovation-Lab is for sure a good idea), I would suggest to add this topic to the agenda of the "Legal-Task-Force group". Beside this, I actually do not have a good overview about the topics "single legal notice". This is fine, but I would also like to remind you that we asked SAP to provide a first draft of the legal terms and conditions that would apply to such FI-WARE Open Innovation Lab. Someone has to provide such a first draft so that we can start rolling-out the discussion within the FI-WARE Legal Task-Force group. This request, I remind you, comes from before this summer. Don't take me wrong, we are all very busy, so maybe you forgot and I can understand it, so let's reactivate it ... Could SAP confirm they could provide such first draft ? Or at least say "no" so that we don't keep waiting. For both of the topics we should find a proper answer before our next review meeting. Otherwise we might run into problems with respect to the expectations of the reviewers and the commission. Waiting for your answer. Thanks, -- Juanjo Best regards, Axel --------------------------- Axel Fasse Senior Researcher SAP Research Karlsruhe SAP AG Vincenz-Priessnitz-Strasse 1 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany T +49 6227 7-52528 F +49 6227 78-55237 M +4915153858917 E axel.fasse at sap.com www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. _______________________________________________ Fiware-pcc mailing list Fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-pcc ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mcp at tid.es Thu Sep 27 17:48:17 2012 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 17:48:17 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] Some important topics from my side In-Reply-To: <2C6296E1876B5C49962495FDACDC7A63617001EF68@DEWDFECCR01.wdf.sap.corp> References: <2C6296E1876B5C49962495FDACDC7A63616FF4277D@DEWDFECCR01.wdf.sap.corp> <506415CD.4090002@tid.es> <2C6296E1876B5C49962495FDACDC7A63617001EF68@DEWDFECCR01.wdf.sap.corp> Message-ID: <50647541.6040601@tid.es> Hi What Juanjo tried to convey in a previous message is that Uwe is a subscriber to the list now. No worries there ... If you want to be 100% sure of this, just ask him in private if he gets this message (it was sent to this list exclusively) BR Miguel El 27/09/2012 17:44, Fasse, Axel escribi?: Hallo Juanjo, it would be very helpful if you can also send out this PCC Mails to Uwe Riss. Gru? Axel From: fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juanjo Hierro Sent: Donnerstag, 27. September 2012 11:01 To: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-pcc] Some important topics from my side On 27/09/12 10:23, Fasse, Axel wrote: Dear PCC colleagues, because of the fact that I will be on vacation for three weeks (1-19.10.2012) I will be replaced by Uwe Riss (uwe.riss at sap.com ) during this time. Please add his name (mail-address) to the mailing-list and inform him if there are topics that he should have a look at. Done. Hope he receives also this message. If you think that there is a need for a sync-meeting with me and Uwe before my vacation, please feel free to contact us directly (please don't forget to invite Uwe Riss). Beside this, I have seen a mail that explains that the "Open-Innovation-Lab" in Seville is in a good shape, from my point of view maybe I am wrong - we do not have officially agreed to "start" this Open-Innovation-Lab so far, because there is - so far as I know - no legal framework that allows us to invite third-parties to use our Software (GE's) within an open (non PPP) context. I guess whoever was talking about the matter was referring to the FI-WARE Testbed. Note that the FI-WARE Open Innovation Lab will mostly be the result of offering the FI-WARE Testbed to third parties. This was scheduled to happen together with delivery of the FI-WARE 2nd Release, although I believe it would not be a bad idea to make it as soon as we agree there is already a comprehensive and relatively set of FI-WARE GEs available (imho, we are still far from that). Of course, we need to define the terms and conditions for usage of FI-WARE GEs in that Open Innovation Lab before launching it, as you say. Because of the fact that we are forced to solve this issue (an Open-innovation-Lab is for sure a good idea), I would suggest to add this topic to the agenda of the "Legal-Task-Force group". Beside this, I actually do not have a good overview about the topics "single legal notice". This is fine, but I would also like to remind you that we asked SAP to provide a first draft of the legal terms and conditions that would apply to such FI-WARE Open Innovation Lab. Someone has to provide such a first draft so that we can start rolling-out the discussion within the FI-WARE Legal Task-Force group. This request, I remind you, comes from before this summer. Don't take me wrong, we are all very busy, so maybe you forgot and I can understand it, so let's reactivate it ... Could SAP confirm they could provide such first draft ? Or at least say "no" so that we don't keep waiting. For both of the topics we should find a proper answer before our next review meeting. Otherwise we might run into problems with respect to the expectations of the reviewers and the commission. Waiting for your answer. Thanks, -- Juanjo Best regards, Axel --------------------------- Axel Fasse Senior Researcher SAP Research Karlsruhe SAP AG Vincenz-Priessnitz-Strasse 1 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany T +49 6227 7-52528 F +49 6227 78-55237 M +4915153858917 E axel.fasse at sap.com www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. _______________________________________________ Fiware-pcc mailing list Fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-pcc ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-pcc mailing list Fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-pcc -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 9 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Fri Sep 28 08:53:51 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 08:53:51 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] VERY URGENT: Observations on the result of the review of FI-WARE within one month of reception of the review report letter EXPIRES tomorrow Message-ID: <5065497F.9050006@tid.es> Hi all, I would need a explicit answer from every of you by EOB TODAY, so please don't forget to answer. According to Article II.23.8 of the grant agreement, we can make observations on the result of the review of our project within one month of reception of the review report letter (attached for your convenience) After the first and second peer-review of the FI-WARE Architecture and Open Specifications, not only me and TID but several of us have reached the conclusion that the reviewers didn't consider all the information that was already there on the Wik when they were evaluating the FI-WARE GE Open Specifications. Actually, architecture description of the GEs seem to be covering part of what the reviewers had expected in a complete specification. What we delivered as the deliverable didn't include this but was just what was needed to be provided, in addtion to what was already there as part of the FI-WARE Architecture Specifications, regarding specifications of APIs, languages, etc. In my honest opinion, we do not risk anything sending this observation because: * we would explain that: * we believe there were actually much more information regarding specifications of FI-WARE GEs than what the reviewers have evaluated (e.g., the part that was common to the FI-WARE Architecture documentation), and clarifying this should not be harmful but may help to explain we have actually worked hard in producing something complete * we recognize that we failed in explaining this when the open specifications were delivered, so we are actually recognizing it was not their fault that they didn't find the information. * we would also explain that we plan to resubmit the specifications so that the issue is solved and third parties do not fall also in the same problem (here, the kind of changes that were being proposed in a recent email by Uwe are in this direction) * last but not least, we would tell them that we are carrying out peer-reviews of the contents anyway, to make sure that content-wise, the specifications are as much complete as possible. Additionally, we may add that we are going to submit to them a report on how the different check-points are being addressed. This may help to reinforce we are taking their review report very much in consideration. The worst we can get is a 'not accepted". I don't believe that, if we deliver the right words, we will get any problem. I will come with a specific text proposal along this morning, but prior to do this, I would like to start collecting your feedback. I have copied the whole list of FI-WARE WPLs/WPAs since some of them may not be part of the FI-WARE PCC mailing list and I believe it was fair to let them object if they believe there are good reasons for doing so. I believe we don't need to involve the rest of the consortia since this a) would take too much time and b) IMHO is not that much a risk as stated above. Looking forward your quick answer Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From thierry.nagellen at orange.com Fri Sep 28 09:26:17 2012 From: thierry.nagellen at orange.com (thierry.nagellen at orange.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 07:26:17 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] VERY URGENT: Observations on the result of the review of FI-WARE within one month of reception of the review report letter EXPIRES tomorrow In-Reply-To: <5065497F.9050006@tid.es> References: <5065497F.9050006@tid.es> Message-ID: <4833_1348817179_5065511A_4833_3526_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C06371F@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> Hi Juanjo, We can send this comment to the reviewers but we really have to chose the right words because as a reviewer you have to evaluate the deliverables you receive for the deadline. What does it mean? In fact this is related to all discussions we had with the Commission that they want pdf files to clearly check what is the status for a dedicated milestone. So it is absolutely normal, from the review process point of view, that they evaluate only the pdf and not the wiki. What we can comment is, because the project is focusing on development and update regularly the wiki dedicated to external teams (UC projects but potentially other people), and as we explain at the review, the content was up to date and much more detailed than the pdf files. We can be surprised that this part was not evaluated because this is part of the agile process the project is using... But at the end, we delivered late the expected pdf (this a fact) and the content was poor regarding the content of the wiki for the review... and we have not to deliver something for the review because always based on the review process, reviewers must have the deliverables 15 days before for evaluation. My concern here is just to claim that we know the process but we did our best also to improve what was not at the right level and not to tell the Commission that they are wrong. BR Thierry De : fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de Juanjo Hierro Envoy? : vendredi 28 septembre 2012 08:54 ? : fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : [Fiware-pcc] VERY URGENT: Observations on the result of the review of FI-WARE within one month of reception of the review report letter EXPIRES tomorrow Hi all, I would need a explicit answer from every of you by EOB TODAY, so please don't forget to answer. According to Article II.23.8 of the grant agreement, we can make observations on the result of the review of our project within one month of reception of the review report letter (attached for your convenience) After the first and second peer-review of the FI-WARE Architecture and Open Specifications, not only me and TID but several of us have reached the conclusion that the reviewers didn't consider all the information that was already there on the Wik when they were evaluating the FI-WARE GE Open Specifications. Actually, architecture description of the GEs seem to be covering part of what the reviewers had expected in a complete specification. What we delivered as the deliverable didn't include this but was just what was needed to be provided, in addtion to what was already there as part of the FI-WARE Architecture Specifications, regarding specifications of APIs, languages, etc. In my honest opinion, we do not risk anything sending this observation because: * we would explain that: * we believe there were actually much more information regarding specifications of FI-WARE GEs than what the reviewers have evaluated (e.g., the part that was common to the FI-WARE Architecture documentation), and clarifying this should not be harmful but may help to explain we have actually worked hard in producing something complete * we recognize that we failed in explaining this when the open specifications were delivered, so we are actually recognizing it was not their fault that they didn't find the information. * we would also explain that we plan to resubmit the specifications so that the issue is solved and third parties do not fall also in the same problem (here, the kind of changes that were being proposed in a recent email by Uwe are in this direction) * last but not least, we would tell them that we are carrying out peer-reviews of the contents anyway, to make sure that content-wise, the specifications are as much complete as possible. Additionally, we may add that we are going to submit to them a report on how the different check-points are being addressed. This may help to reinforce we are taking their review report very much in consideration. The worst we can get is a 'not accepted". I don't believe that, if we deliver the right words, we will get any problem. I will come with a specific text proposal along this morning, but prior to do this, I would like to start collecting your feedback. I have copied the whole list of FI-WARE WPLs/WPAs since some of them may not be part of the FI-WARE PCC mailing list and I believe it was fair to let them object if they believe there are good reasons for doing so. I believe we don't need to involve the rest of the consortia since this a) would take too much time and b) IMHO is not that much a risk as stated above. Looking forward your quick answer Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Fri Sep 28 13:59:05 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:59:05 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] VERY URGENT: Observations on the result of the review of FI-WARE within one month of reception of the review report letter EXPIRES tomorrow In-Reply-To: <50658796.3030707@tid.es> References: <50658796.3030707@tid.es> Message-ID: <50659109.1010704@tid.es> Hi, This is the wording that I would propose (comments on wording, please accompanied with concrete editing proposals, are welcome): == Dear PO and reviewers, According to Article II.23.8 of the grant agreement, we can make observations on the result of the review of our project within one month of reception of the review report letter. This email elaborates on the observation we would like to submit regarding review of deliverables linked to Open Specifications. Right after reception of the review report, we have carried out a number of peer-reviews (still under way) targeted to answer the concerns expressed by reviewers. This is one activity we have assigned the highest priority because we agree with reviewers that there is a critical need to release a complete and comprehensive set of Generic Enabler (GE) Open Specifications in FI-WARE. In the review report, it is actually stated that the delivered Open Specifications were "inadequate for communication and unified understanding with the Use Case projects, are not of the required quality to serve the needs of those projects, and do not provide sufficient basis for practical implementation by software developers" One of the conclusions reached after the first peer-reviews that were conducted was that it seems like there may have been a mismatch between what reviewers were expecting to be the contents of each FI-WARE GE Chapter's Open Specification deliverable and what it was actually formally delivered, considering the deliverable standalone. However, this didn't mean that the missing contents were not already there on the public, published and available to the Use Case projects and the general public. FI-WARE deliverables were structured in a manner that would allow sharing information with Use Case projects as soon as it was available, without waiting for having all the details fixed. The complete Open Specification of a given FI-WARE GE comprises, following some best practices of existing standards, a table of contents like the following: 1. Overview * Introduction * Usage Example scenarios 2. Basic Concepts (this may include a description of the underlying conceptual model) 3. Reference Architecture 4. Main interactions * (here, a description of the external behavior exposed by the GE will be provided and this would be essentially covered by explaining how interactions with the GE, through the APIs it will support, are expected to work) 5. Basic Design Principles 6. Detailed Open API specifications 7. References The first 5 points and point 7 were provided as soon as possible making it part of the FI-WARE Architecture deliverable, because that way we could share with UC projects part of the specifications as soon as possible, without waiting for the finalization of the detailed API specifications. Therefore, when we delivered the FI-WARE GE Open Specifications deliverable we just submitted the Detailed Open API Specifications. Now we realize that we made a mistake not explaining this, but at least we would like to explain what we did, in the hope this will improve the overall judgement of the work that we did. In the light of this explanations we would also kindly ask the reviewers and PO to consider reduction of the costs rejection formula that was announced. Having said all this, we would like to share with you that we are anyway performing a deep peer-review of the contents of the specifications (considering the whole table of contents described above). Sure there are point to improve, and we have identified some of them already, so that we are implementing them as soon as possible. Besides this review of contents, we plan to re-structure the contents of the wiki so that we can produce a complete .pdf per each FI-WARE GE, comprising the table of contents above. We hope this will prevent other audience for getting the same impression as reviewers got. Best regards, == ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 28/09/12 08:53, Juanjo Hierro wrote: Hi all, I would need a explicit answer from every of you by EOB TODAY, so please don't forget to answer. According to Article II.23.8 of the grant agreement, we can make observations on the result of the review of our project within one month of reception of the review report letter (attached for your convenience) After the first and second peer-review of the FI-WARE Architecture and Open Specifications, not only me and TID but several of us have reached the conclusion that the reviewers didn't consider all the information that was already there on the Wik when they were evaluating the FI-WARE GE Open Specifications. Actually, architecture description of the GEs seem to be covering part of what the reviewers had expected in a complete specification. What we delivered as the deliverable didn't include this but was just what was needed to be provided, in addtion to what was already there as part of the FI-WARE Architecture Specifications, regarding specifications of APIs, languages, etc. In my honest opinion, we do not risk anything sending this observation because: * we would explain that: * we believe there were actually much more information regarding specifications of FI-WARE GEs than what the reviewers have evaluated (e.g., the part that was common to the FI-WARE Architecture documentation), and clarifying this should not be harmful but may help to explain we have actually worked hard in producing something complete * we recognize that we failed in explaining this when the open specifications were delivered, so we are actually recognizing it was not their fault that they didn't find the information. * we would also explain that we plan to resubmit the specifications so that the issue is solved and third parties do not fall also in the same problem (here, the kind of changes that were being proposed in a recent email by Uwe are in this direction) * last but not least, we would tell them that we are carrying out peer-reviews of the contents anyway, to make sure that content-wise, the specifications are as much complete as possible. Additionally, we may add that we are going to submit to them a report on how the different check-points are being addressed. This may help to reinforce we are taking their review report very much in consideration. The worst we can get is a 'not accepted". I don't believe that, if we deliver the right words, we will get any problem. I will come with a specific text proposal along this morning, but prior to do this, I would like to start collecting your feedback. I have copied the whole list of FI-WARE WPLs/WPAs since some of them may not be part of the FI-WARE PCC mailing list and I believe it was fair to let them object if they believe there are good reasons for doing so. I believe we don't need to involve the rest of the consortia since this a) would take too much time and b) IMHO is not that much a risk as stated above. Looking forward your quick answer Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ste.depanfilis at gmail.com Fri Sep 28 14:13:29 2012 From: ste.depanfilis at gmail.com (ste.depanfilis at gmail.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:13:29 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] R: VERY URGENT: Observations on the result of the review of FI-WARE within one month of reception of the review report letter EXPIRES tomorrow In-Reply-To: <5065497F.9050006@tid.es> References: <5065497F.9050006@tid.es> Message-ID: <1231895006-1348833997-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-934687620-@b17.c14.bise7.blackberry> Dear Juanjo and all, It is a surprise you ask us something so important not discussed at pcc to be approved so shortly ..... Although i psycologiacally agree with you, it is also very well true that by contract only "paper" is what matter, so i completely second thierry. Such a statement should not be sent it is dangerous and contractually wrong. Sorry but this is the true reality.... Ciao Stefano Le mail ti raggiungono ovunque con BlackBerry? from Vodafone! -----Original Message----- From: Juanjo Hierro Sender: fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 08:53:51 To: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-pcc] VERY URGENT: Observations on the result of the review of FI-WARE within one month of reception of the review report letter EXPIRES tomorrow _______________________________________________ Fiware-pcc mailing list Fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-pcc From axel.fasse at sap.com Fri Sep 28 14:29:50 2012 From: axel.fasse at sap.com (Fasse, Axel) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:29:50 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] Statements of conditions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <2C6296E1876B5C49962495FDACDC7A63617001FB4A@DEWDFECCR01.wdf.sap.corp> Dear Jose, we have provided all of the information that you are asking for. If you need further support, please let me know. Best regards, Axel From: fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO Sent: Mittwoch, 26. September 2012 08:35 To: 'fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu' Subject: [Fiware-pcc] Statements of conditions Dear PCC According to the decisions of the audio conference last September 19th, I am sending to you a first draft of the table stating the conditions for releasing FI-WARE elements during and after the trials (as requested by the EC) Our plan is to distribute it to the whole project (GA) after your final approval. If you have any major suggestion, please let me know before next Friday The document is https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Asksuam5cM-YdGxJOXJidjI2bjJMTC1KQWNnb2FDWmc#gid=0 I prefer to use a google sheet to allow common edition. Since this is to become a public document, I do not think we need to worry too much about confidentiality issues BR ---- Jose Jimenez Telefonica I+D jimenez at tid.es tf +34 91 4832660 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ste.depanfilis at gmail.com Fri Sep 28 14:38:33 2012 From: ste.depanfilis at gmail.com (ste.depanfilis at gmail.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:38:33 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] R: Re: VERY URGENT: Observations on the result of the review of FI-WARE within one month of reception of the review report letter EXPIRES tomorrow In-Reply-To: <50659109.1010704@tid.es> References: <50658796.3030707@tid.es> <50659109.1010704@tid.es> Message-ID: <1342699893-1348835501-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1826196267-@b17.c14.bise7.blackberry> Dear Juanjo all, This text better, but still you should say, if true, that our specifications are meant to serve both users of ges, but also developers of ges. The latter is the crucial point of interest of reviwers! Are we sure we cover it???? If YES this is what you have also to write! Btw all the cost will be accepted only after this i'm afraid Ciao Stefano Le mail ti raggiungono ovunque con BlackBerry? from Vodafone! -----Original Message----- From: Juanjo Hierro Sender: fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:59:05 To: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-pcc] VERY URGENT: Observations on the result of the review of FI-WARE within one month of reception of the review report letter EXPIRES tomorrow _______________________________________________ Fiware-pcc mailing list Fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-pcc From jhierro at tid.es Fri Sep 28 15:22:45 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 15:22:45 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] R: Re: VERY URGENT: Observations on the result of the review of FI-WARE within one month of reception of the review report letter EXPIRES tomorrow In-Reply-To: <1342699893-1348835501-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1826196267-@b17.c14.bise7.blackberry> References: <50658796.3030707@tid.es> <50659109.1010704@tid.es> <1342699893-1348835501-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1826196267-@b17.c14.bise7.blackberry> Message-ID: <5065A4A5.4070604@tid.es> Dear Stefano, It is still unclear if you support sending this letter. We cannot send it if someone objects. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 28/09/12 14:38, ste.depanfilis at gmail.com wrote: > Dear Juanjo all, > > This text better, but still you should say, if true, that our specifications are meant to serve both users of ges, but also developers of ges. > > The latter is the crucial point of interest of reviwers! > > Are we sure we cover it???? If YES this is what you have also to write! > > Btw all the cost will be accepted only after this i'm afraid > > Ciao > Stefano > > Le mail ti raggiungono ovunque con BlackBerry? from Vodafone! > > -----Original Message----- > From: Juanjo Hierro > Sender: fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu > Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:59:05 > To: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu > Subject: Re: [Fiware-pcc] VERY URGENT: Observations on the result of the review > of FI-WARE within one month of reception of the review report letter EXPIRES > tomorrow > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-pcc mailing list > Fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-pcc > ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx From ste.depanfilis at gmail.com Fri Sep 28 15:40:22 2012 From: ste.depanfilis at gmail.com (ste.depanfilis at gmail.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:40:22 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] R: Re: R: Re: VERY URGENT: Observations on the result of the review of FI-WARE within one month of reception of the review report letter EXPIRES tomorrow In-Reply-To: <5065A4A5.4070604@tid.es> References: <50658796.3030707@tid.es> <50659109.1010704@tid.es> <1342699893-1348835501-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1826196267-@b17.c14.bise7.blackberry> <5065A4A5.4070604@tid.es> Message-ID: <309725654-1348839210-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1867440347-@b17.c14.bise7.blackberry> I support but those points should be adressed..... Ciao Stefano Le mail ti raggiungono ovunque con BlackBerry? from Vodafone! -----Original Message----- From: Juanjo Hierro Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 15:22:45 To: Cc: ; fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: R: Re: [Fiware-pcc] VERY URGENT: Observations on the result of the review of FI-WARE within one month of reception of the review report letter EXPIRES tomorrow Dear Stefano, It is still unclear if you support sending this letter. We cannot send it if someone objects. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 28/09/12 14:38, ste.depanfilis at gmail.com wrote: > Dear Juanjo all, > > This text better, but still you should say, if true, that our specifications are meant to serve both users of ges, but also developers of ges. > > The latter is the crucial point of interest of reviwers! > > Are we sure we cover it???? If YES this is what you have also to write! > > Btw all the cost will be accepted only after this i'm afraid > > Ciao > Stefano > > Le mail ti raggiungono ovunque con BlackBerry? from Vodafone! > > -----Original Message----- > From: Juanjo Hierro > Sender: fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu > Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:59:05 > To: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu > Subject: Re: [Fiware-pcc] VERY URGENT: Observations on the result of the review > of FI-WARE within one month of reception of the review report letter EXPIRES > tomorrow > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-pcc mailing list > Fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-pcc > ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx From pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it Fri Sep 28 16:55:04 2012 From: pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it (Garino Pierangelo) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 16:55:04 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] R: R: Re: R: Re: VERY URGENT: Observations on the result of the review of FI-WARE within one month of reception of the review report letter EXPIRES tomorrow Message-ID: I do agree with the comments by Stefano and Thierry. We cannot say they were wrong in the review of our deliverables, and we need to assure next deliveries will comply with the expected contents i.e. Specifications for GE users AND developers. Then we can say that the rejected ones were probably not well combined and presented, as most of that information was already present, but this needs to come later in the observations. Apologise i cannot contribute better to wording as I'm with the smartphone only , and with connection issues. Br Pier Inviato da Samsung Mobile -------- Original message -------- Subject: [Fiware-pcc] R: Re: R: Re: VERY URGENT: Observations on the result of the review of FI-WARE within one month of reception of the review report letter EXPIRES tomorrow From: "ste.depanfilis at gmail.com" To: Juanjo Hierro CC: "fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu" ,"fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu" ,"fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu" ,"fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu" I support but those points should be adressed..... Ciao Stefano Le mail ti raggiungono ovunque con BlackBerry? from Vodafone! -----Original Message----- From: Juanjo Hierro Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 15:22:45 To: Cc: ; fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: R: Re: [Fiware-pcc] VERY URGENT: Observations on the result of the review of FI-WARE within one month of reception of the review report letter EXPIRES tomorrow Dear Stefano, It is still unclear if you support sending this letter. We cannot send it if someone objects. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 28/09/12 14:38, ste.depanfilis at gmail.com wrote: > Dear Juanjo all, > > This text better, but still you should say, if true, that our specifications are meant to serve both users of ges, but also developers of ges. > > The latter is the crucial point of interest of reviwers! > > Are we sure we cover it???? If YES this is what you have also to write! > > Btw all the cost will be accepted only after this i'm afraid > > Ciao > Stefano > > Le mail ti raggiungono ovunque con BlackBerry? from Vodafone! > > -----Original Message----- > From: Juanjo Hierro > Sender: fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu > Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:59:05 > To: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu > Subject: Re: [Fiware-pcc] VERY URGENT: Observations on the result of the review > of FI-WARE within one month of reception of the review report letter EXPIRES > tomorrow > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-pcc mailing list > Fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-pcc > ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-pcc mailing list Fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-pcc Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [cid:00000000000000000000000000000003 at TI.Disclaimer]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 677 bytes Desc: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg URL: From jhierro at tid.es Fri Sep 28 21:04:36 2012 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 21:04:36 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] R: R: Re: R: Re: VERY URGENT: Observations on the result of the review of FI-WARE within one month of reception of the review report letter EXPIRES tomorrow In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5065F4C4.6060204@tid.es> Hi all, Given the fact that we didn't reach enough consensus, also some people questioned the benefits of this against the risks and, last but not least, some members of the PCC didn't respond, we will finally not send a letter with observations. On another track, I was planning to send the PO and reviewers an email explaining how we are addressing the different checkpoints they setup, in order to demonstrate our engagement to deal with issues raised in the project review report and how things are progressing. I will share a draft of this message as soon as I get it finished so that we can all review it. But there is no a strict deadline for that as there was regarding sending observations. To all those who has responded this request, many thanks for your quick reaction and constructive comments. Have a nice weekend. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 28/09/12 16:55, Garino Pierangelo wrote: I do agree with the comments by Stefano and Thierry. We cannot say they were wrong in the review of our deliverables, and we need to assure next deliveries will comply with the expected contents i.e. Specifications for GE users AND developers. Then we can say that the rejected ones were probably not well combined and presented, as most of that information was already present, but this needs to come later in the observations. Apologise i cannot contribute better to wording as I'm with the smartphone only , and with connection issues. Br Pier Inviato da Samsung Mobile -------- Original message -------- Subject: [Fiware-pcc] R: Re: R: Re: VERY URGENT: Observations on the result of the review of FI-WARE within one month of reception of the review report letter EXPIRES tomorrow From: "ste.depanfilis at gmail.com" To: Juanjo Hierro CC: "fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu" ,"fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu" ,"fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu" ,"fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu" I support but those points should be adressed..... Ciao Stefano Le mail ti raggiungono ovunque con BlackBerry? from Vodafone! -----Original Message----- From: Juanjo Hierro Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 15:22:45 To: Cc: ; fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: R: Re: [Fiware-pcc] VERY URGENT: Observations on the result of the review of FI-WARE within one month of reception of the review report letter EXPIRES tomorrow Dear Stefano, It is still unclear if you support sending this letter. We cannot send it if someone objects. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 28/09/12 14:38, ste.depanfilis at gmail.com wrote: > Dear Juanjo all, > > This text better, but still you should say, if true, that our specifications are meant to serve both users of ges, but also developers of ges. > > The latter is the crucial point of interest of reviwers! > > Are we sure we cover it???? If YES this is what you have also to write! > > Btw all the cost will be accepted only after this i'm afraid > > Ciao > Stefano > > Le mail ti raggiungono ovunque con BlackBerry? from Vodafone! > > -----Original Message----- > From: Juanjo Hierro > Sender: fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu > Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:59:05 > To: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu > Subject: Re: [Fiware-pcc] VERY URGENT: Observations on the result of the review > of FI-WARE within one month of reception of the review report letter EXPIRES > tomorrow > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-pcc mailing list > Fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-pcc > ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-pcc mailing list Fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-pcc Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [rispetta l'ambiente]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: