Dear Arian As you know, in the existing version of the DoW we still have the Scientific council and the MAC. We have considered the issue at a PCC meeting today and the general feeling of the consortium was that those groups are not really useful to the project any more. They were initially plan as a input body for getting information on real world scientific and market situation, but, as the project has developed, we have found that the UA projects were a much more useful and reliable information source. Also, we think the function of those groups is redundant with the Advisory Board, recently put forward by CONCORD The consortium considers the funding needed for those groups could be much better used in a different way, so we are asking you for permission for not including them in a future version of the DoW and find a better use for the funding initial planned for those activities. If you still think they could be useful, our proposal would be they are could perhaps assist in the event to be carried out in Seville. Anyway, we look forward your suggestions in this direction. Best regards ---- Jose Jimenez Telefonica I+D jimenez at tid.es tf +34 91 4832660 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-pcc/attachments/20120919/82d61d95/attachment.html>
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy