From nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Fri Apr 5 17:35:43 2013 From: nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu (Nuria De-Lama Sanchez) Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 17:35:43 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] Future Internet event in Istanbul (April 11)-FI-WARE speaker confirmation Message-ID: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A01E36FE7@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> Dear colleagues, Let me attract your attention to an urgent issue related to an event where a FI-WARE speaker has been requested. Haluk (in CC), working in the Finest Use Case and now in C-Space too, sent an e-mail to me last week but I was already on Easter holidays and I went too quickly through it. I realized about the urgency just now, but I hope we can still cope with it. The event is titled "Building an eco-system for delivering Innovative Future Internet Services and Applications" and it is organized by European Commission & TUBITAK EU FP7 National Coordination Office, with the support of FI-PPP Projects. Find attached the agenda of the event for your convenience. It will be in Istanbul on April 11. Is any of you available to attend the event and make an overall FI-WARE presentation of half an hour? (11:30-12:00). If any of you got in contact with Haluk meanwhile, then ignore this e-mail, but if that was not the case I encourage you to think about it and get in contact with Haluk ASAP. There is a lot of material already from the FI-WARE week, so no extra effort has to be made in material preparation. Besides that Istanbul is a great place to be! Thanks in advance and have a good week-end, Nuria de Lama Research & Innovation Representative to the European Commission ?? T +34 91214 9321 F +34 91754 3252 nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atosresearch.eu es.atos.net? ? -----Original Message----- From: Haluk G?kmen [mailto:haluk.gokmen at arcelik.com] Sent: mi?rcoles, 27 de marzo de 2013 15:08 To: Nuria De-Lama Sanchez Subject: FI_UpdatedDraft-Agenda_260313.pdf Importance: High Dear Nuria, Who is coming from FI-WARE to our event? If you are available then you can join us. Best regards, Haluk Bu e-posta mesaji kisiye ozel olup, gizli bilgiler iceriyor olabilir. Eger bu e-posta mesaji size yanlislikla ulasmissa, icerigini hic bir sekilde kullanmayiniz ve ekli dosyalari acmayiniz. Bu durumda lutfen e-posta mesajini kullaniciya hemen geri gonderiniz ve tum kopyalarini mesaj kutunuzdan siliniz. Bu e-posta mesaji, hic bir sekilde, herhangi bir amac icin cogaltilamaz, yayinlanamaz ve para karsiligi satilamaz. Bu e-posta mesaji viruslere karsi anti-virus sistemleri tarafindan taranmistir. Ancak yollayici, bu e-posta mesajinin - virus koruma sistemleri ile kontrol ediliyor olsa bile - virus icermedigini garanti etmez ve meydana gelebilecek zararlardan dogacak hicbir sorumlulugu kabul etmez. This message is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed , and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or you receive this mail in error, you should refrain from making any use of the contents and from opening any attachment. In that case, please notify the sender immediately and return the message to the sender, then, delete and destroy all copies. This e-mail message, can not be copied, published or sold for any reason. This e-mail message has been swept by anti-virus systems for the presence of computer viruses. In doing so, however, sender cannot warrant that virus or other forms of data corruption may not be present and do not take any responsibility in any occurrence. ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI_UpdatedDraft-Agenda_260313.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 474149 bytes Desc: FI_UpdatedDraft-Agenda_260313.pdf URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Fri Apr 5 18:05:51 2013 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 18:05:51 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] Future Internet event in Istanbul (April 11)-FI-WARE speaker confirmation In-Reply-To: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A01E36FE7@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> References: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A01E36FE7@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> Message-ID: dear nuria, i'd love to be there, but already engaged for the same day in a similar presentation at the fi-star kick-off in heidelberg. have a nice weekend! stefano 2013/4/5 Nuria De-Lama Sanchez > Dear colleagues, > > Let me attract your attention to an urgent issue related to an event where > a FI-WARE speaker has been requested. > > Haluk (in CC), working in the Finest Use Case and now in C-Space too, sent > an e-mail to me last week but I was already on Easter holidays and I went > too quickly through it. I realized about the urgency just now, but I hope > we can still cope with it. > > The event is titled "Building an eco-system for delivering Innovative > Future Internet Services and Applications" and it is organized by European > Commission & TUBITAK EU FP7 National Coordination Office, with the support > of FI-PPP Projects. Find attached the agenda of the event for your > convenience. > > It will be in Istanbul on April 11. Is any of you available to attend the > event and make an overall FI-WARE presentation of half an hour? > (11:30-12:00). > > If any of you got in contact with Haluk meanwhile, then ignore this > e-mail, but if that was not the case I encourage you to think about it and > get in contact with Haluk ASAP. There is a lot of material already from the > FI-WARE week, so no extra effort has to be made in material preparation. > > Besides that Istanbul is a great place to be! Thanks in advance and have a > good week-end, > > > Nuria de Lama > > Research & Innovation > Representative to the European Commission > > T +34 91214 9321 > F +34 91754 3252 > nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu > Albarrac?n 25 > 28037 Madrid > Spain > www.atosresearch.eu > es.atos.net > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Haluk G?kmen [mailto:haluk.gokmen at arcelik.com] > Sent: mi?rcoles, 27 de marzo de 2013 15:08 > To: Nuria De-Lama Sanchez > Subject: FI_UpdatedDraft-Agenda_260313.pdf > Importance: High > > Dear Nuria, > > Who is coming from FI-WARE to our event? If you are available then you can > join us. > > Best regards, > Haluk > > Bu e-posta mesaji kisiye ozel olup, gizli bilgiler iceriyor olabilir. Eger > bu e-posta mesaji size yanlislikla ulasmissa, icerigini hic bir sekilde > kullanmayiniz ve ekli dosyalari acmayiniz. Bu durumda lutfen e-posta > mesajini kullaniciya hemen geri gonderiniz ve tum kopyalarini mesaj > kutunuzdan siliniz. Bu e-posta mesaji, hic bir sekilde, herhangi bir amac > icin cogaltilamaz, yayinlanamaz ve para karsiligi satilamaz. Bu e-posta > mesaji viruslere karsi anti-virus sistemleri tarafindan taranmistir. Ancak > yollayici, bu e-posta mesajinin - virus koruma sistemleri ile kontrol > ediliyor olsa bile - virus icermedigini garanti etmez ve meydana > gelebilecek zararlardan dogacak hicbir sorumlulugu kabul etmez. > This message is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to > whom it is addressed , and may contain confidential information. If you > are not the intended recipient of this message or you receive this mail in > error, you should refrain from making any use of the contents and from > opening any attachment. In that case, please notify the sender immediately > and return the message to the sender, then, delete and destroy all copies. > This e-mail message, can not be copied, published or sold for any reason. > This e-mail message has been swept by anti-virus systems for the presence > of computer viruses. In doing so, however, sender cannot warrant that > virus or other forms of data corruption may not be present and do not take > any responsibility in any occurrence. > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended > solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive > this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. > As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos > group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although > the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, > the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and > will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. > > Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion > confidencial > destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente > pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. > Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar > inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. > Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos > no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun > compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. > Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor > no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera > danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-pcc mailing list > Fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-pcc > > -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Fri Apr 5 18:24:18 2013 From: nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu (Nuria De-Lama Sanchez) Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 18:24:18 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] Future Internet event in Istanbul (April 11)-FI-WARE speaker confirmation In-Reply-To: References: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A01E36FE7@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> Message-ID: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A01E36FF7@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> Thanks Stefano for your quick answer. What about the others? Nuria de Lama Research & Innovation Representative to the European Commission T +34 91214 9321 F +34 91754 3252 nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atosresearch.eu es.atos.net From: stefano de panfilis [mailto:stefano.depanfilis at eng.it] Sent: viernes, 05 de abril de 2013 18:06 To: Nuria De-Lama Sanchez Cc: fiware-pcc; Haluk G?kmen Subject: Re: [Fiware-pcc] Future Internet event in Istanbul (April 11)-FI-WARE speaker confirmation dear nuria, i'd love to be there, but already engaged for the same day in a similar presentation at the fi-star kick-off in heidelberg. have a nice weekend! stefano 2013/4/5 Nuria De-Lama Sanchez Dear colleagues, Let me attract your attention to an urgent issue related to an event where a FI-WARE speaker has been requested. Haluk (in CC), working in the Finest Use Case and now in C-Space too, sent an e-mail to me last week but I was already on Easter holidays and I went too quickly through it. I realized about the urgency just now, but I hope we can still cope with it. The event is titled "Building an eco-system for delivering Innovative Future Internet Services and Applications" and it is organized by European Commission & TUBITAK EU FP7 National Coordination Office, with the support of FI-PPP Projects. Find attached the agenda of the event for your convenience. It will be in Istanbul on April 11. Is any of you available to attend the event and make an overall FI-WARE presentation of half an hour? (11:30-12:00). If any of you got in contact with Haluk meanwhile, then ignore this e-mail, but if that was not the case I encourage you to think about it and get in contact with Haluk ASAP. There is a lot of material already from the FI-WARE week, so no extra effort has to be made in material preparation. Besides that Istanbul is a great place to be! Thanks in advance and have a good week-end, Nuria de Lama Research & Innovation Representative to the European Commission T +34 91214 9321 F +34 91754 3252 nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atosresearch.eu es.atos.net -----Original Message----- From: Haluk G?kmen [mailto:haluk.gokmen at arcelik.com] Sent: mi?rcoles, 27 de marzo de 2013 15:08 To: Nuria De-Lama Sanchez Subject: FI_UpdatedDraft-Agenda_260313.pdf Importance: High Dear Nuria, Who is coming from FI-WARE to our event? If you are available then you can join us. Best regards, Haluk Bu e-posta mesaji kisiye ozel olup, gizli bilgiler iceriyor olabilir. Eger bu e-posta mesaji size yanlislikla ulasmissa, icerigini hic bir sekilde kullanmayiniz ve ekli dosyalari acmayiniz. Bu durumda lutfen e-posta mesajini kullaniciya hemen geri gonderiniz ve tum kopyalarini mesaj kutunuzdan siliniz. Bu e-posta mesaji, hic bir sekilde, herhangi bir amac icin cogaltilamaz, yayinlanamaz ve para karsiligi satilamaz. Bu e-posta mesaji viruslere karsi anti-virus sistemleri tarafindan taranmistir. Ancak yollayici, bu e-posta mesajinin - virus koruma sistemleri ile kontrol ediliyor olsa bile - virus icermedigini garanti etmez ve meydana gelebilecek zararlardan dogacak hicbir sorumlulugu kabul etmez. This message is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed , and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or you receive this mail in error, you should refrain from making any use of the contents and from opening any attachment. In that case, please notify the sender immediately and return the message to the sender, then, delete and destroy all copies. This e-mail message, can not be copied, published or sold for any reason. This e-mail message has been swept by anti-virus systems for the presence of computer viruses. In doing so, however, sender cannot warrant that virus or other forms of data corruption may not be present and do not take any responsibility in any occurrence. ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Fiware-pcc mailing list Fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-pcc -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 78 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 816 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: From jhierro at tid.es Sat Apr 6 14:52:40 2013 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2013 14:52:40 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] Fwd: RE: VERY IMPORTANT: amendment 4 of the FI-WARE DoW dealing with PMs reallocation In-Reply-To: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D06D9E445@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> References: <69AD1A9684E7184DADBE43806285BA9D06D9E445@S-DC-ESTF03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> Message-ID: <51601A98.4000408@tid.es> Dear all, For the avoidance of doubt, our PO has sent us the attached mail (with copy to the official mailbox of the project) indicating that he agrees with the PMs reallocation to be implemented in the next amendment of the DoW (amendment 4). Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: VERY IMPORTANT: amendment 4 of the FI-WARE DoW dealing with PMs reallocation Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2013 12:38:51 +0000 From: To: CC: , , , Dear all, The re-allocation of PMs is fine to me. Best regards, Arian. From: Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 4:52 PM To: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Cc: CNECT-ICT-285248; subsidies at tid.es; mcp at tid.es; jdps at tid.es Subject: Re: VERY IMPORTANT: amendment 4 of the FI-WARE DoW dealing with PMs reallocation Dear Arian, Could you clarify ? Thanks in advance, -- Juanjo Hierro ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 25/03/13 19:26, Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu wrote: Dear Juanjo, The overview of changes presented is very well done and clear, and I don't have any issues with them, except for the points below. I don't care that much about shifting PMs and who gets what. Here the consortium has apparently bound itself to all kind of weird pre-existing agreements anyway, not using the flexibility offered by the grant agreement. Having said that, the thing to avoid is that industry withdraws and academia gets more funding. That is the trend here, with industry reducing its involvement with 640k and academia/research institutes increasing with 640k. I understand there is no choice because industry is not willing/able to do more, but it is against the spirit of the industry leadership in FI-WARE/FI-PPP. And frankly, it looks very bad on EU industry. Please note that I care more about changes in the DoW wrt tasks/activities to be carried out. Large changes in efforts without any change in the task description (e.g. the iMinds addition in WP3) cannot be correct. Then, what is most important is what happens with the contributions from the withdrawing partners, NSN-FI and EAB. What happens with Ericsson's Service Composition - Ericsson Composition Engine (ECE) What happens with Ericsson's Gateway Device Management GE - Ericsson IoT Gateway In a previous email (19 Nov 2012), you concluded (for the ECE): "So the problem here is not about sustainability beyond the FI-PPP (which Ericsson states would be provided) but inside the FI-PPP ..." Will they remain available to FI-WARE? Under what conditions? If nothing remains available, what does that mean for their contribution to FI-WARE? Will these be replaced? Same questions for NSN-FI. I understand they were in charge of the GE "Backend Device Management"?? And they contributed an asset called "Cumulocity". So same questions as above. Specific questions: 1) What does the underlined text mean in the sentence "Withdrawal of Ericsson from WP5. EAB has 20 PM in DoW and it has declared 3,34 PM until M18, so it transfers 16 PM to FRAUNHOFER because they have to assume Advanced Connectivity GEs with ETSI-M2M interface and will be involeved in the project at the beginning of April 2013!" 2) What does the following sentence mean? "TRDF-P finished at 31-12-2012. People moved to TRDF." TRDP is no longer a third party? Finally, are you going to ask an amendment for the Electronic-only signature and transmission of Form C (see attachment)? Best regards, Arian. PS. I am kind-of allergic to statements like your "No early response...", knowing that the only deadlines I'm bound to are the ones in the grant agreement? -----Original Message----- From: Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] Sent: Friday, March 22, 2013 9:06 AM To: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Cc: CNECT-ICT-285248; subsidies at tid.es; Miguel Carrillo; Javier de Pedro Sanchez Subject: VERY IMPORTANT: amendment 4 of the FI-WARE DoW dealing with PMs reallocation Dear Arian, Once we have finalized amendment 3 of our DoW, we should open a new amendment dealing with fixing all PMs reallocation that were pending (some of which pending since July last year). As already announced in our mail on January 20th this year, the situation is critical regarding some of these PMs reallocation, particularly dealing with the ability to handle withdrawal of several partners. All this PMs reallocation have been agreed among the partners at PCC (Project Coordination Committee), WPLs/WPAs and General Assembly level. We believe that is is critical to close this amendment 4 before end of April as to allow a reporting of costs for the 2nd period that is aligned with an approved DoW. Please find enclosed a spreadsheet which summarizes the changes already implemented in amendment 3 as well as changes proposed in amendment 4. Changes being proposed for amendment 4 are summarized in the sheet titled "Changes (amendment 4)". There is a final picture of PMs allocation to tasks for each WP as well as impact in figures (overall funding is kept the same). Consumption of allocated PMs have taken place since start of the 2nd reporting period and, in the case of partners withdrawing the consortium, since a decision was taken regarding what partner was going to take over their responsibilities. We will soon send you a draft of the DoW that will incorporate the changes summarized here. We will kindly ask you to send a response to this mail with your agreement to the proposed PMs reallocation in advance to approval of the DoW amendment itself which may take more time. That would give the existing partners, overall those taking the responsibility to take over the tasks from withdrawing partners, the necessary security to keep their investments they have been making so far. No early response will be taken as acknowledge and acceptance of this proposed PMs reallocation. We will rather appreciate your help in moving this forward. Best regards, -- Juanjo Hierro ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Sat Apr 6 14:59:53 2013 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2013 14:59:53 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] Future Internet event in Istanbul (April 11)-FI-WARE speaker confirmation In-Reply-To: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A01E36FE7@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> References: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A01E36FE7@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> Message-ID: <51601C49.8060500@tid.es> Not feasible for me nor anyone in Telefonica ... ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 05/04/13 17:35, Nuria De-Lama Sanchez wrote: Dear colleagues, Let me attract your attention to an urgent issue related to an event where a FI-WARE speaker has been requested. Haluk (in CC), working in the Finest Use Case and now in C-Space too, sent an e-mail to me last week but I was already on Easter holidays and I went too quickly through it. I realized about the urgency just now, but I hope we can still cope with it. The event is titled "Building an eco-system for delivering Innovative Future Internet Services and Applications" and it is organized by European Commission & TUBITAK EU FP7 National Coordination Office, with the support of FI-PPP Projects. Find attached the agenda of the event for your convenience. It will be in Istanbul on April 11. Is any of you available to attend the event and make an overall FI-WARE presentation of half an hour? (11:30-12:00). If any of you got in contact with Haluk meanwhile, then ignore this e-mail, but if that was not the case I encourage you to think about it and get in contact with Haluk ASAP. There is a lot of material already from the FI-WARE week, so no extra effort has to be made in material preparation. Besides that Istanbul is a great place to be! Thanks in advance and have a good week-end, Nuria de Lama Research & Innovation Representative to the European Commission T +34 91214 9321 F +34 91754 3252 nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atosresearch.eu es.atos.net -----Original Message----- From: Haluk G?kmen [mailto:haluk.gokmen at arcelik.com] Sent: mi?rcoles, 27 de marzo de 2013 15:08 To: Nuria De-Lama Sanchez Subject: FI_UpdatedDraft-Agenda_260313.pdf Importance: High Dear Nuria, Who is coming from FI-WARE to our event? If you are available then you can join us. Best regards, Haluk Bu e-posta mesaji kisiye ozel olup, gizli bilgiler iceriyor olabilir. Eger bu e-posta mesaji size yanlislikla ulasmissa, icerigini hic bir sekilde kullanmayiniz ve ekli dosyalari acmayiniz. Bu durumda lutfen e-posta mesajini kullaniciya hemen geri gonderiniz ve tum kopyalarini mesaj kutunuzdan siliniz. Bu e-posta mesaji, hic bir sekilde, herhangi bir amac icin cogaltilamaz, yayinlanamaz ve para karsiligi satilamaz. Bu e-posta mesaji viruslere karsi anti-virus sistemleri tarafindan taranmistir. Ancak yollayici, bu e-posta mesajinin - virus koruma sistemleri ile kontrol ediliyor olsa bile - virus icermedigini garanti etmez ve meydana gelebilecek zararlardan dogacak hicbir sorumlulugu kabul etmez. This message is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed , and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or you receive this mail in error, you should refrain from making any use of the contents and from opening any attachment. In that case, please notify the sender immediately and return the message to the sender, then, delete and destroy all copies. This e-mail message, can not be copied, published or sold for any reason. This e-mail message has been swept by anti-virus systems for the presence of computer viruses. In doing so, however, sender cannot warrant that virus or other forms of data corruption may not be present and do not take any responsibility in any occurrence. ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Fiware-pcc mailing list Fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-pcc ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it Mon Apr 8 08:39:39 2013 From: pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it (Garino Pierangelo) Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 08:39:39 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] R: Future Internet event in Istanbul (April 11)-FI-WARE speaker confirmation In-Reply-To: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A01E36FF7@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> References: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A01E36FE7@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A01E36FF7@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> Message-ID: Dear Nuria, no ways to attend for me too, sorry. BR Pier Da: fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di Nuria De-Lama Sanchez Inviato: venerd? 5 aprile 2013 18:24 A: stefano de panfilis Cc: Haluk G?kmen; fiware-pcc Oggetto: Re: [Fiware-pcc] Future Internet event in Istanbul (April 11)-FI-WARE speaker confirmation Thanks Stefano for your quick answer. What about the others? Nuria de Lama Research & Innovation Representative to the European Commission T +34 91214 9321 F +34 91754 3252 nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atosresearch.eu es.atos.net [cid:image002.gif at 01CE3434.9B9E2720] From: stefano de panfilis [mailto:stefano.depanfilis at eng.it] Sent: viernes, 05 de abril de 2013 18:06 To: Nuria De-Lama Sanchez Cc: fiware-pcc; Haluk G?kmen Subject: Re: [Fiware-pcc] Future Internet event in Istanbul (April 11)-FI-WARE speaker confirmation dear nuria, i'd love to be there, but already engaged for the same day in a similar presentation at the fi-star kick-off in heidelberg. have a nice weekend! stefano 2013/4/5 Nuria De-Lama Sanchez > Dear colleagues, Let me attract your attention to an urgent issue related to an event where a FI-WARE speaker has been requested. Haluk (in CC), working in the Finest Use Case and now in C-Space too, sent an e-mail to me last week but I was already on Easter holidays and I went too quickly through it. I realized about the urgency just now, but I hope we can still cope with it. The event is titled "Building an eco-system for delivering Innovative Future Internet Services and Applications" and it is organized by European Commission & TUBITAK EU FP7 National Coordination Office, with the support of FI-PPP Projects. Find attached the agenda of the event for your convenience. It will be in Istanbul on April 11. Is any of you available to attend the event and make an overall FI-WARE presentation of half an hour? (11:30-12:00). If any of you got in contact with Haluk meanwhile, then ignore this e-mail, but if that was not the case I encourage you to think about it and get in contact with Haluk ASAP. There is a lot of material already from the FI-WARE week, so no extra effort has to be made in material preparation. Besides that Istanbul is a great place to be! Thanks in advance and have a good week-end, Nuria de Lama Research & Innovation Representative to the European Commission T +34 91214 9321 F +34 91754 3252 nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atosresearch.eu es.atos.net -----Original Message----- From: Haluk G?kmen [mailto:haluk.gokmen at arcelik.com] Sent: mi?rcoles, 27 de marzo de 2013 15:08 To: Nuria De-Lama Sanchez Subject: FI_UpdatedDraft-Agenda_260313.pdf Importance: High Dear Nuria, Who is coming from FI-WARE to our event? If you are available then you can join us. Best regards, Haluk Bu e-posta mesaji kisiye ozel olup, gizli bilgiler iceriyor olabilir. Eger bu e-posta mesaji size yanlislikla ulasmissa, icerigini hic bir sekilde kullanmayiniz ve ekli dosyalari acmayiniz. Bu durumda lutfen e-posta mesajini kullaniciya hemen geri gonderiniz ve tum kopyalarini mesaj kutunuzdan siliniz. Bu e-posta mesaji, hic bir sekilde, herhangi bir amac icin cogaltilamaz, yayinlanamaz ve para karsiligi satilamaz. Bu e-posta mesaji viruslere karsi anti-virus sistemleri tarafindan taranmistir. Ancak yollayici, bu e-posta mesajinin - virus koruma sistemleri ile kontrol ediliyor olsa bile - virus icermedigini garanti etmez ve meydana gelebilecek zararlardan dogacak hicbir sorumlulugu kabul etmez. This message is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed , and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or you receive this mail in error, you should refrain from making any use of the contents and from opening any attachment. In that case, please notify the sender immediately and return the message to the sender, then, delete and destroy all copies. This e-mail message, can not be copied, published or sold for any reason. This e-mail message has been swept by anti-virus systems for the presence of computer viruses. In doing so, however, sender cannot warrant that virus or other forms of data corruption may not be present and do not take any responsibility in any occurrence. ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Fiware-pcc mailing list Fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-pcc -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [cid:00000000000000000000000000000003 at TI.Disclaimer]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 78 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 816 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 677 bytes Desc: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg URL: From nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Fri Apr 12 11:25:07 2013 From: nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu (Nuria De-Lama Sanchez) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 11:25:07 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] FIF National Workshops = raising interest among relevant stakeholders for FI-PPP Phase 3-FI-WARE speakers!!!!!!!!!!!!! Message-ID: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A01E8F86B@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> Hi all, This e-mail is very important and we have to take decisions ASAP. As you know, the EC is organizing different workshops to promote the PPP and the use of FI-WARE together with Member States. In the coming months/weeks there will be many workshops where they expect speakers from our project. No one from FI-WARE attended the workshop in Istanbul that I circulated some time ago. But there is another short-term workshop we have to decide upon. Date and place are: 22 April, Porto, Portugal I attach the agenda. Is there anyone from the WPL group available and willing to attend? Juanjo, if no one volunteers today I would like you to include this point in the periodic teleconferences of WPL/WPA so that this can be decided by next Monday and I can transmit our decision to the EC. They expect a quite generic presentation of 30 minutes on how to use the GE. Send your answers to me and Juanjo and including the PCC in CC- Thanks! Nuria de Lama Research & Innovation Representative to the European Commission T +34 91214 9321 F +34 91754 3252 nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atosresearch.eu es.atos.net ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 78 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 816 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: PT FIF Chapter Workshop v4.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 533011 bytes Desc: PT FIF Chapter Workshop v4.pdf URL: From nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Fri Apr 12 11:36:32 2013 From: nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu (Nuria De-Lama Sanchez) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 11:36:32 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] Other FIF National workshops-FI-WARE speakers!!! Message-ID: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A01E8F882@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> Hi all, Let me come back again with complementary information to the previous e-mail. Besides the workshops of Istanbul and Porto there will be a series of additional events in different countries. I think the attendance by FI-WARE representatives should be shared between members based on your availability. Some of them already have concrete information in terms of place and month. Find this information below and please, when you tell me your potential availability for the Porto one, tell me if you can make any of the following ones: * Belgium - May-June (TBD) * Hungary - 5 June, Budapest (TBD) * Germany - 13 June, Dresden (TBD) Once again, your preliminary answers as soon as possible and always keeping in CC Juanjo, Carlos and of course myself. Nuria de Lama Research & Innovation Representative to the European Commission T +34 91214 9321 F +34 91754 3252 nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atosresearch.eu es.atos.net ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 78 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 816 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Apr 15 01:45:58 2013 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 01:45:58 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <516B3FB6.7000406@tid.es> Dear colleagues, To our suprise, Ericsson is claiming costs during the period until March 2013 ... From Telefonica's perspective, efforts spent by Ericsson during the period from November 2012 (when they announced their withdrawal) until March 2013 should be considered as to compensate/minimize the impact of their withdrawal, therefore, should not go to reduce the funding to be spent to overcome the situation ... We would rather appreciate to get your feedback on how we should react ... Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 13:52:25 +0000 From: Henrik Abramowicz To: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ CC: subsidies at tid.es , Alen Jusufbasic , Magnus Karlsson E , Anders Casp?r , JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA , thierry.nagellen at orange.com , Andrea Manieri (manieri at eng.it) , 'stefano.depanfilis at eng.it' (stefano.depanfilis at eng.it) Again This is until March 31 2013 from November 1 2012 BR Henrik From: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ [mailto:jdps at tid.es] Sent: den 12 april 2013 15:50 To: Henrik Abramowicz Cc: subsidies at tid.es; Alen Jusufbasic; Magnus Karlsson E; Anders Casp?r; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; thierry.nagellen at orange.com; Andrea Manieri (manieri at eng.it); 'stefano.depanfilis at eng.it' (stefano.depanfilis at eng.it) Subject: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Henrik, I understand that you are talking about November 2012, and that means that you didn't work later in FI-WARE project. If not, please let me know. Please provide justifications of this effort. BR Javier. De: Henrik Abramowicz [mailto:henrik.abramowicz at ericsson.com] Enviado el: viernes, 12 de abril de 2013 15:38 Para: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ CC: subsidies at tid.es; Alen Jusufbasic; Magnus Karlsson E; Anders Casp?r; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; thierry.nagellen at orange.com; Andrea Manieri (manieri at eng.it); 'stefano.depanfilis at eng.it' (stefano.depanfilis at eng.it) Asunto: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Dear Javier et al I got these figures from our controller below Hope this helps BR Henrik WP 5 WP 9 WP 10 TOTAL Henrik Abramowicz Total 0 0 0 0,0 Jakob Saros Total 2,7 0 2,7 Jan H?ller Total 0,1 0 0,1 John Sandberg Total 0 1,2 1,2 Marika St?lnacke Total 0 0,2 0,4 0,5 Torgny Johansson Total 0 0,5 0,5 Vlasios Tsiatsis Total 1,5 0 1,5 Total 4,2 1,8 0,4 6,4 From: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ [mailto:jdps at tid.es] Sent: den 12 april 2013 15:36 To: Henrik Abramowicz Cc: subsidies at tid.es; Alen Jusufbasic; Magnus Karlsson E; Anders Casp?r; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; thierry.nagellen at orange.com; Andrea Manieri (manieri at eng.it); 'stefano.depanfilis at eng.it' (stefano.depanfilis at eng.it) Subject: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Importance: High Dear Henrik, we need to close this by Monday because it is blocking the amendment 4. Please, before sending your data to Coordinator, I kindly ask you to get a consensus with each WPL, in CC. WP5 (FT) -> Thierry Nagallen WP9, WP10 (E-IIS) -> Andrea Manieri & Stefano de Panfilis. As I told you, the current information is that Ericsson finished its contribution to FI-WARE project on M18, October 2012. Dear WPL, Ericsson says that they have been contributing to FI-WARE project since November 2012 as follows: WP 5 440 hours Wp 9 131,75 hours Wp 10 97 hours I kindly ask you to let us know if you agree, after Ericsson has been provided the requested information in attached e-mail. BR Javier. De: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ Enviado el: viernes, 12 de abril de 2013 12:33 Para: 'Henrik Abramowicz' CC: subsidies at tid.es; Alen Jusufbasic; Magnus Karlsson E; Anders Casp?r; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA Asunto: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT ***) Importancia: Alta Henrik, please send your contribution in PM by month and by WP since November 1st, 2012, providing the justification of the work carried out. It will be sent to WPL and Juanjo to be reviewed. This is very urgent. BR Javier. ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From thierry.nagellen at orange.com Mon Apr 15 09:50:34 2013 From: thierry.nagellen at orange.com (thierry.nagellen at orange.com) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 07:50:34 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] [Fiware-wpl] R: Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) In-Reply-To: <2044045062-1366006478-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-234744792-@b14.c14.bise7.blackberry> References: <516B3FB6.7000406@tid.es> <2044045062-1366006478-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-234744792-@b14.c14.bise7.blackberry> Message-ID: <4965_1366012236_516BB14C_4965_26_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C0D080E@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> Dear all, I would just come back on the process to claim costs. Maybe I'm wrong but all partners have to provide their claimed costs to the coordinator for the project but at the end they are related to a contract between the partner and EC. This point is important to avoid any long discussion and because in many other projects if a partner decided to claim costs EC had lots of difficulties to reject them without very good reasons. When Ericsson decided to withdraw, we were not at a milestone with an official financial statement, as Arian explained before regarding rejected deliverables. So maybe Ericsson was involved in some minor tasks and if this is the case they can claim for some costs. Regarding WP5 IoT, Ericsson worked with Telecom Italia to solve some issues regarding integration between GEs that were not solved for the review (there are some emails on this topic) and Ericsson attended also some weekly meeting especially to try to transfer their GE instance to another partner. For these actions they can claim some costs but certainly not the 3 PM they claimed And if they claim some costs we have also to check that everything is available for the project and the programme (documentation, software...) and currently one doc (Generic Device API) has disappeared from the wiki regarding the Gateway Device Management GE so in this case I cannot consider they have worked correctly but I'm waiting for details from Ericsson to give you a final answer. BR Thierry -----Message d'origine----- De?: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de depa at eng.it Envoy??: lundi 15 avril 2013 08:17 ??: Juanjo Hierro; fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet?: [Fiware-wpl] R: Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Dear Juanjo and colleagues, The position of Engineering is very simple. It was their unilateral decision to withdraw the project. They were not asked for any reason to do so nor the project changed its position or way of working thus making them impossible to stay in. On the contrary the create a certain damage to the consortium. When they withdraw they declare no more effort to be provided, again not a request from us. So if for whatever reason a wpl asked them to complete a certain work this must be recognised. For what pertains wp10 no effort provided in the concerned period. If all the other wpl declare the same nothing can be recognised to them. Ciao Stefano Le mail ti raggiungono ovunque con BlackBerry? from Vodafone! -----Original Message----- From: Juanjo Hierro Sender: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 01:45:58 To: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. From pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it Mon Apr 15 10:30:41 2013 From: pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it (Garino Pierangelo) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 10:30:41 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] R: Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) In-Reply-To: <516B3FB6.7000406@tid.es> References: <516B3FB6.7000406@tid.es> Message-ID: Dear Juanjo and All, As suggested by comments already circulated, I believe too that costs claimed should be accepted only when they are fully verified as actual work done (e.g. documented additional work performed, etc). As for WP10, also in WP7/I2ND chapter no activities were performed by Ericsson in the concerned period, so no effort could be recognized to them. BR Pier Da: fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di Juanjo Hierro Inviato: luned? 15 aprile 2013 01:46 A: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: Javier de Pedro Sanchez Oggetto: [Fiware-pcc] Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Dear colleagues, To our suprise, Ericsson is claiming costs during the period until March 2013 ... From Telefonica's perspective, efforts spent by Ericsson during the period from November 2012 (when they announced their withdrawal) until March 2013 should be considered as to compensate/minimize the impact of their withdrawal, therefore, should not go to reduce the funding to be spent to overcome the situation ... We would rather appreciate to get your feedback on how we should react ... Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 13:52:25 +0000 From: Henrik Abramowicz To: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ CC: subsidies at tid.es , Alen Jusufbasic , Magnus Karlsson E , Anders Casp?r , JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA , thierry.nagellen at orange.com , Andrea Manieri (manieri at eng.it) , 'stefano.depanfilis at eng.it' (stefano.depanfilis at eng.it) Again This is until March 31 2013 from November 1 2012 BR Henrik From: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ [mailto:jdps at tid.es] Sent: den 12 april 2013 15:50 To: Henrik Abramowicz Cc: subsidies at tid.es; Alen Jusufbasic; Magnus Karlsson E; Anders Casp?r; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; thierry.nagellen at orange.com; Andrea Manieri (manieri at eng.it); 'stefano.depanfilis at eng.it' (stefano.depanfilis at eng.it) Subject: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Henrik, I understand that you are talking about November 2012, and that means that you didn't work later in FI-WARE project. If not, please let me know. Please provide justifications of this effort. BR Javier. De: Henrik Abramowicz [mailto:henrik.abramowicz at ericsson.com] Enviado el: viernes, 12 de abril de 2013 15:38 Para: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ CC: subsidies at tid.es; Alen Jusufbasic; Magnus Karlsson E; Anders Casp?r; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; thierry.nagellen at orange.com; Andrea Manieri (manieri at eng.it); 'stefano.depanfilis at eng.it' (stefano.depanfilis at eng.it) Asunto: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Dear Javier et al I got these figures from our controller below Hope this helps BR Henrik WP 5 WP 9 WP 10 TOTAL Henrik Abramowicz Total 0 0 0 0,0 Jakob Saros Total 2,7 0 2,7 Jan H?ller Total 0,1 0 0,1 John Sandberg Total 0 1,2 1,2 Marika St?lnacke Total 0 0,2 0,4 0,5 Torgny Johansson Total 0 0,5 0,5 Vlasios Tsiatsis Total 1,5 0 1,5 Total 4,2 1,8 0,4 6,4 From: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ [mailto:jdps at tid.es] Sent: den 12 april 2013 15:36 To: Henrik Abramowicz Cc: subsidies at tid.es; Alen Jusufbasic; Magnus Karlsson E; Anders Casp?r; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; thierry.nagellen at orange.com; Andrea Manieri (manieri at eng.it); 'stefano.depanfilis at eng.it' (stefano.depanfilis at eng.it) Subject: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Importance: High Dear Henrik, we need to close this by Monday because it is blocking the amendment 4. Please, before sending your data to Coordinator, I kindly ask you to get a consensus with each WPL, in CC. WP5 (FT) -> Thierry Nagallen WP9, WP10 (E-IIS) -> Andrea Manieri & Stefano de Panfilis. As I told you, the current information is that Ericsson finished its contribution to FI-WARE project on M18, October 2012. Dear WPL, Ericsson says that they have been contributing to FI-WARE project since November 2012 as follows: WP 5 440 hours Wp 9 131,75 hours Wp 10 97 hours I kindly ask you to let us know if you agree, after Ericsson has been provided the requested information in attached e-mail. BR Javier. De: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ Enviado el: viernes, 12 de abril de 2013 12:33 Para: 'Henrik Abramowicz' CC: subsidies at tid.es; Alen Jusufbasic; Magnus Karlsson E; Anders Casp?r; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA Asunto: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT ***) Importancia: Alta Henrik, please send your contribution in PM by month and by WP since November 1st, 2012, providing the justification of the work carried out. It will be sent to WPL and Juanjo to be reviewed. This is very urgent. BR Javier. ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [cid:00000000000000000000000000000003 at TI.Disclaimer]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 677 bytes Desc: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg URL: From manieri at eng.it Mon Apr 15 10:39:41 2013 From: manieri at eng.it (Andrea Manieri) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 10:39:41 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] [Fiware-wpl] R: Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) In-Reply-To: References: <516B3FB6.7000406@tid.es> Message-ID: <516BBCCD.7040407@eng.it> Dear Juanjo, Stefano already expressed the ENG position. Wrt the WP9 activities I do confirm that since Nov 12 the only work done was related to the take over of the catalogue by UPM. Best, A. Il 15/04/2013 10:30, Garino Pierangelo ha scritto: > > Dear Juanjo and All, > > As suggested by comments already circulated, I believe too that costs > claimed should be accepted only when they are fully verified as actual > work done (e.g. documented additional work performed, etc). > > As for WP10, also in WP7/I2ND chapter no activities were performed by > Ericsson in the concerned period, so no effort could be recognized to > them. > > BR > > Pier > > *Da:*fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu > [mailto:fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] *Per conto di *Juanjo Hierro > *Inviato:* luned? 15 aprile 2013 01:46 > *A:* fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; > fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu > *Cc:* Javier de Pedro Sanchez > *Oggetto:* [Fiware-pcc] Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** > VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) > > Dear colleagues, > > To our suprise, Ericsson is claiming costs during the period until > March 2013 ... > > From Telefonica's perspective, efforts spent by Ericsson during the > period from November 2012 (when they announced their withdrawal) until > March 2013 should be considered as to compensate/minimize the impact > of their withdrawal, therefore, should not go to reduce the funding to > be spent to overcome the situation ... > > We would rather appreciate to get your feedback on how we should > react ... > > Best regards, > > -- Juanjo > > > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website:www.tid.es > email:jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator > and Chief Architect > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website:http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter:http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > > > -------- Original Message -------- > > *Subject: * > > > > RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) > > *Date: * > > > > Fri, 12 Apr 2013 13:52:25 +0000 > > *From: * > > > > Henrik Abramowicz > > > *To: * > > > > JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ > > *CC: * > > > > subsidies at tid.es > , Alen Jusufbasic > , > Magnus Karlsson E > , Anders Casp?r > , JUAN > JOSE HIERRO SUREDA , > thierry.nagellen at orange.com > , > Andrea Manieri (manieri at eng.it ) > , 'stefano.depanfilis at eng.it > ' (stefano.depanfilis at eng.it > ) > > > Again > > This is *until March 31 2013* from November 1 2012 > > BR > > Henrik > > *From:*JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ [mailto:jdps at tid.es] > *Sent:* den 12 april 2013 15:50 > *To:* Henrik Abramowicz > *Cc:* subsidies at tid.es ; Alen Jusufbasic; > Magnus Karlsson E; Anders Casp?r; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; > thierry.nagellen at orange.com ; > Andrea Manieri (manieri at eng.it ); > 'stefano.depanfilis at eng.it ' > (stefano.depanfilis at eng.it ) > *Subject:* RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & > URGENT ***) > > Henrik, I understand that you are talking about November 2012, and > that means that you didn't work later in FI-WARE project. > > If not, please let me know. > > Please provide justifications of this effort. > > BR > > Javier. > > *De:*Henrik Abramowicz [mailto:henrik.abramowicz at ericsson.com] > *Enviado el:* viernes, 12 de abril de 2013 15:38 > *Para:* JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ > *CC:* subsidies at tid.es ; Alen Jusufbasic; > Magnus Karlsson E; Anders Casp?r; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; > thierry.nagellen at orange.com ; > Andrea Manieri (manieri at eng.it ); > 'stefano.depanfilis at eng.it ' > (stefano.depanfilis at eng.it ) > *Asunto:* RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & > URGENT ***) > > Dear Javier et al > > I got these figures from our controller below > > Hope this helps > > BR > > Henrik > > > > > > WP 5 > > > > WP 9 > > > > WP 10 > > > > > > TOTAL > > *Henrik Abramowicz Total* > > > > > 0 > > > > 0 > > > > 0 > > > > > 0,0 > > *Jakob Saros Total* > > > > > 2,7 > > > > 0 > > > > > > 2,7 > > *Jan H?ller Total* > > > > > 0,1 > > > > 0 > > > > > > 0,1 > > *John Sandberg Total* > > > > > 0 > > > > 1,2 > > > > > > 1,2 > > *Marika St?lnacke Total* > > > > > 0 > > > > 0,2 > > > > 0,4 > > > > > 0,5 > > *Torgny Johansson Total* > > > > > 0 > > > > 0,5 > > > > > > 0,5 > > *Vlasios Tsiatsis Total* > > > > > 1,5 > > > > 0 > > > > > > 1,5 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *Total* > > > > > 4,2 > > > > 1,8 > > > > 0,4 > > > > > 6,4 > > *From:*JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ [mailto:jdps at tid.es] > *Sent:* den 12 april 2013 15:36 > *To:* Henrik Abramowicz > *Cc:* subsidies at tid.es ; Alen Jusufbasic; > Magnus Karlsson E; Anders Casp?r; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; > thierry.nagellen at orange.com ; > Andrea Manieri (manieri at eng.it ); > 'stefano.depanfilis at eng.it ' > (stefano.depanfilis at eng.it ) > *Subject:* RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & > URGENT ***) > *Importance:* High > > *_Dear Henrik_*, we need to close this by Monday because it is > blocking the amendment 4. > > Please, before sending your data to Coordinator, I kindly ask you to > get a consensus with each WPL, in CC. > > WP5 (FT) -> Thierry Nagallen > > WP9, WP10 (E-IIS) -> Andrea Manieri & Stefano de Panfilis. > > As I told you, the current information is that Ericsson finished its > contribution to FI-WARE project on M18, October 2012. > > *_Dear WPL_*, Ericsson says that they have been contributing to > FI-WARE project since November 2012 as follows: > > WP 5 440 hours > > Wp 9 131,75 hours > > Wp 10 97 hours > > I kindly ask you to let us know if you agree, after Ericsson has been > provided the requested information in attached e-mail. > > BR > > Javier. > > *De:*JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ > *Enviado el:* viernes, 12 de abril de 2013 12:33 > *Para:* 'Henrik Abramowicz' > *CC:* subsidies at tid.es ; Alen Jusufbasic; > Magnus Karlsson E; Anders Casp?r; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA > *Asunto:* RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT ***) > *Importancia:* Alta > > Henrik, please send your contribution in PM by month and by WP since > November 1st, 2012, providing the justification of the work carried out. > > It will be sent to WPL and Juanjo to be reviewed. > > This is very urgent. > > BR > > Javier. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede > consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico > en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send > and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede > consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico > en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send > and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede > consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico > en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send > and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente > alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione > derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente > vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete > cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di > provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. > > /This e-mail and any attachments//is //confidential and may contain > privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. > Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is > unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete > this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return > e-mail, Thanks./ > > *rispetta l'ambienteRispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se > non ? necessario.* > > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-wpl mailing list > Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Apr 15 14:50:10 2013 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 14:50:10 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] [Fiware-wpl] R: Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) In-Reply-To: <4965_1366012236_516BB14C_4965_26_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C0D080E@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> References: <516B3FB6.7000406@tid.es> <2044045062-1366006478-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-234744792-@b14.c14.bise7.blackberry> <4965_1366012236_516BB14C_4965_26_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C0D080E@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> Message-ID: <516BF782.6060304@tid.es> Could all WPLs leading WPs where Ericsson intends to declare costs elaborate on how much, as maximum, they would be willing to accept as costs reported by Ericsson ? So far, based on gathered responses, I have: * WP5: Ericsson worked with Telecom Italia to solve some issues regarding integration between GEs that were not solved for the review (there are some emails on this topic) and Ericsson attended also some weekly meeting especially to try to transfer their GE instance to another partner. Thierry explained that these actions they can claim some costs but certainly not the 3 PM they claimed - However, we have to come with a specific proposal on how much would be acceptable (please see note in red below). * WP7: no activities were performed by Ericsson in the concerned period, so no costs claims will be accepted * WP9: Andrea mentions that since Nov 12 the only work done was related to the take over of the catalogue by UPM. Does this mean that you wouldn't accept any costs claims (in line with red note below) ? Please confirm * WP10: no effort was provided in the concerned period, therefore, no costs claims will be accepted Last but not least ... it seems like Ericsson doesn't declare costs regarding WP3 ... Can SAP clarify whether we are safe on WP3 ? In general terms, I believe we shoud tell Ericsson that they should not claim costs related to the take over of Ericsson's activities. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 15/04/13 09:50, thierry.nagellen at orange.com wrote: Dear all, I would just come back on the process to claim costs. Maybe I'm wrong but all partners have to provide their claimed costs to the coordinator for the project but at the end they are related to a contract between the partner and EC. This point is important to avoid any long discussion and because in many other projects if a partner decided to claim costs EC had lots of difficulties to reject them without very good reasons. When Ericsson decided to withdraw, we were not at a milestone with an official financial statement, as Arian explained before regarding rejected deliverables. So maybe Ericsson was involved in some minor tasks and if this is the case they can claim for some costs. Regarding WP5 IoT, Ericsson worked with Telecom Italia to solve some issues regarding integration between GEs that were not solved for the review (there are some emails on this topic) and Ericsson attended also some weekly meeting especially to try to transfer their GE instance to another partner. For these actions they can claim some costs but certainly not the 3 PM they claimed And if they claim some costs we have also to check that everything is available for the project and the programme (documentation, software...) and currently one doc (Generic Device API) has disappeared from the wiki regarding the Gateway Device Management GE so in this case I cannot consider they have worked correctly but I'm waiting for details from Ericsson to give you a final answer. BR Thierry -----Message d'origine----- De : fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de depa at eng.it Envoy? : lundi 15 avril 2013 08:17 ? : Juanjo Hierro; fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : [Fiware-wpl] R: Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Dear Juanjo and colleagues, The position of Engineering is very simple. It was their unilateral decision to withdraw the project. They were not asked for any reason to do so nor the project changed its position or way of working thus making them impossible to stay in. On the contrary the create a certain damage to the consortium. When they withdraw they declare no more effort to be provided, again not a request from us. So if for whatever reason a wpl asked them to complete a certain work this must be recognised. For what pertains wp10 no effort provided in the concerned period. If all the other wpl declare the same nothing can be recognised to them. Ciao Stefano Le mail ti raggiungono ovunque con BlackBerry? from Vodafone! -----Original Message----- From: Juanjo Hierro Sender: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 01:45:58 To: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. . ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Apr 15 14:50:34 2013 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 14:50:34 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] [Fiware-wpl] R: Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) In-Reply-To: <4965_1366012236_516BB14C_4965_26_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C0D080E@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> References: <516B3FB6.7000406@tid.es> <2044045062-1366006478-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-234744792-@b14.c14.bise7.blackberry> <4965_1366012236_516BB14C_4965_26_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C0D080E@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> Message-ID: <516BF79A.8080205@tid.es> Could all WPLs leading WPs where Ericsson intends to declare costs elaborate on how much, as maximum, they would be willing to accept as costs reported by Ericsson ? So far, based on gathered responses, I have: * WP5: Ericsson worked with Telecom Italia to solve some issues regarding integration between GEs that were not solved for the review (there are some emails on this topic) and Ericsson attended also some weekly meeting especially to try to transfer their GE instance to another partner. Thierry explained that these actions they can claim some costs but certainly not the 3 PM they claimed - However, we have to come with a specific proposal on how much would be acceptable (please see note in red below). * WP7: no activities were performed by Ericsson in the concerned period, so no costs claims will be accepted * WP9: Andrea mentions that since Nov 12 the only work done was related to the take over of the catalogue by UPM. Does this mean that you wouldn't accept any costs claims (in line with red note below) ? Please confirm * WP10: no effort was provided in the concerned period, therefore, no costs claims will be accepted Last but not least ... it seems like Ericsson doesn't declare costs regarding WP3 ... Can SAP clarify whether we are safe on WP3 ? In general terms, I believe we shoud tell Ericsson that they should not claim costs related to the take over of Ericsson's activities. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 15/04/13 09:50, thierry.nagellen at orange.com wrote: Dear all, I would just come back on the process to claim costs. Maybe I'm wrong but all partners have to provide their claimed costs to the coordinator for the project but at the end they are related to a contract between the partner and EC. This point is important to avoid any long discussion and because in many other projects if a partner decided to claim costs EC had lots of difficulties to reject them without very good reasons. When Ericsson decided to withdraw, we were not at a milestone with an official financial statement, as Arian explained before regarding rejected deliverables. So maybe Ericsson was involved in some minor tasks and if this is the case they can claim for some costs. Regarding WP5 IoT, Ericsson worked with Telecom Italia to solve some issues regarding integration between GEs that were not solved for the review (there are some emails on this topic) and Ericsson attended also some weekly meeting especially to try to transfer their GE instance to another partner. For these actions they can claim some costs but certainly not the 3 PM they claimed And if they claim some costs we have also to check that everything is available for the project and the programme (documentation, software...) and currently one doc (Generic Device API) has disappeared from the wiki regarding the Gateway Device Management GE so in this case I cannot consider they have worked correctly but I'm waiting for details from Ericsson to give you a final answer. BR Thierry -----Message d'origine----- De : fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de depa at eng.it Envoy? : lundi 15 avril 2013 08:17 ? : Juanjo Hierro; fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : [Fiware-wpl] R: Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Dear Juanjo and colleagues, The position of Engineering is very simple. It was their unilateral decision to withdraw the project. They were not asked for any reason to do so nor the project changed its position or way of working thus making them impossible to stay in. On the contrary the create a certain damage to the consortium. When they withdraw they declare no more effort to be provided, again not a request from us. So if for whatever reason a wpl asked them to complete a certain work this must be recognised. For what pertains wp10 no effort provided in the concerned period. If all the other wpl declare the same nothing can be recognised to them. Ciao Stefano Le mail ti raggiungono ovunque con BlackBerry? from Vodafone! -----Original Message----- From: Juanjo Hierro Sender: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 01:45:58 To: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. . ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From thierry.nagellen at orange.com Mon Apr 15 15:13:54 2013 From: thierry.nagellen at orange.com (thierry.nagellen at orange.com) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 13:13:54 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] [Fiware-wpl] R: Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) In-Reply-To: <516BF782.6060304@tid.es> References: <516B3FB6.7000406@tid.es> <2044045062-1366006478-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-234744792-@b14.c14.bise7.blackberry> <4965_1366012236_516BB14C_4965_26_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C0D080E@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <516BF782.6060304@tid.es> Message-ID: <24078_1366031636_516BFD14_24078_1227_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C0D0A2E@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> Hi all, Based on what Ericsson claimed before and what they have to achieve in November and December, they should not claim more than 2 weeks for IoT. Attending IoT weekly meeting was to find a solution to reduce the impact of their withdrawal so should not be relevant to claim costs. BR Thierry De : Juanjo Hierro [mailto:jhierro at tid.es] Envoy? : lundi 15 avril 2013 14:50 ? : NAGELLEN Thierry OLNC/OLPS Cc : depa at eng.it; fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : Re: [Fiware-wpl] R: Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Could all WPLs leading WPs where Ericsson intends to declare costs elaborate on how much, as maximum, they would be willing to accept as costs reported by Ericsson ? So far, based on gathered responses, I have: * WP5: Ericsson worked with Telecom Italia to solve some issues regarding integration between GEs that were not solved for the review (there are some emails on this topic) and Ericsson attended also some weekly meeting especially to try to transfer their GE instance to another partner. Thierry explained that these actions they can claim some costs but certainly not the 3 PM they claimed - However, we have to come with a specific proposal on how much would be acceptable (please see note in red below). * WP7: no activities were performed by Ericsson in the concerned period, so no costs claims will be accepted * WP9: Andrea mentions that since Nov 12 the only work done was related to the take over of the catalogue by UPM. Does this mean that you wouldn't accept any costs claims (in line with red note below) ? Please confirm * WP10: no effort was provided in the concerned period, therefore, no costs claims will be accepted Last but not least ... it seems like Ericsson doesn't declare costs regarding WP3 ... Can SAP clarify whether we are safe on WP3 ? In general terms, I believe we shoud tell Ericsson that they should not claim costs related to the take over of Ericsson's activities. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 15/04/13 09:50, thierry.nagellen at orange.com wrote: Dear all, I would just come back on the process to claim costs. Maybe I'm wrong but all partners have to provide their claimed costs to the coordinator for the project but at the end they are related to a contract between the partner and EC. This point is important to avoid any long discussion and because in many other projects if a partner decided to claim costs EC had lots of difficulties to reject them without very good reasons. When Ericsson decided to withdraw, we were not at a milestone with an official financial statement, as Arian explained before regarding rejected deliverables. So maybe Ericsson was involved in some minor tasks and if this is the case they can claim for some costs. Regarding WP5 IoT, Ericsson worked with Telecom Italia to solve some issues regarding integration between GEs that were not solved for the review (there are some emails on this topic) and Ericsson attended also some weekly meeting especially to try to transfer their GE instance to another partner. For these actions they can claim some costs but certainly not the 3 PM they claimed And if they claim some costs we have also to check that everything is available for the project and the programme (documentation, software...) and currently one doc (Generic Device API) has disappeared from the wiki regarding the Gateway Device Management GE so in this case I cannot consider they have worked correctly but I'm waiting for details from Ericsson to give you a final answer. BR Thierry -----Message d'origine----- De : fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de depa at eng.it Envoy? : lundi 15 avril 2013 08:17 ? : Juanjo Hierro; fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : [Fiware-wpl] R: Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Dear Juanjo and colleagues, The position of Engineering is very simple. It was their unilateral decision to withdraw the project. They were not asked for any reason to do so nor the project changed its position or way of working thus making them impossible to stay in. On the contrary the create a certain damage to the consortium. When they withdraw they declare no more effort to be provided, again not a request from us. So if for whatever reason a wpl asked them to complete a certain work this must be recognised. For what pertains wp10 no effort provided in the concerned period. If all the other wpl declare the same nothing can be recognised to them. Ciao Stefano Le mail ti raggiungono ovunque con BlackBerry? from Vodafone! -----Original Message----- From: Juanjo Hierro Sender: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 01:45:58 To: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. . ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From depa at eng.it Mon Apr 15 08:16:55 2013 From: depa at eng.it (depa at eng.it) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 06:16:55 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] R: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) In-Reply-To: <516B3FB6.7000406@tid.es> References: <516B3FB6.7000406@tid.es> Message-ID: <2044045062-1366006478-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-234744792-@b14.c14.bise7.blackberry> Dear Juanjo and colleagues, The position of Engineering is very simple. It was their unilateral decision to withdraw the project. They were not asked for any reason to do so nor the project changed its position or way of working thus making them impossible to stay in. On the contrary the create a certain damage to the consortium. When they withdraw they declare no more effort to be provided, again not a request from us. So if for whatever reason a wpl asked them to complete a certain work this must be recognised. For what pertains wp10 no effort provided in the concerned period. If all the other wpl declare the same nothing can be recognised to them. Ciao Stefano Le mail ti raggiungono ovunque con BlackBerry? from Vodafone! -----Original Message----- From: Juanjo Hierro Sender: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 01:45:58 To: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl From depa at eng.it Mon Apr 15 10:00:44 2013 From: depa at eng.it (depa at eng.it) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 08:00:44 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] R: RE: [Fiware-wpl] R: Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) In-Reply-To: <4965_1366012236_516BB14C_4965_26_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C0D080E@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> References: <516B3FB6.7000406@tid.es> <2044045062-1366006478-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-234744792-@b14.c14.bise7.blackberry> <4965_1366012236_516BB14C_4965_26_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C0D080E@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> Message-ID: <959013641-1366012707-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-488800624-@b14.c14.bise7.blackberry> Dear Thierry, This is exactly the approach i indicated in my previous email. Ciao Stefano Le mail ti raggiungono ovunque con BlackBerry? from Vodafone! -----Original Message----- From: Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 07:50:34 To: depa at eng.it; Juanjo Hierro; fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: [Fiware-wpl] R: Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Dear all, I would just come back on the process to claim costs. Maybe I'm wrong but all partners have to provide their claimed costs to the coordinator for the project but at the end they are related to a contract between the partner and EC. This point is important to avoid any long discussion and because in many other projects if a partner decided to claim costs EC had lots of difficulties to reject them without very good reasons. When Ericsson decided to withdraw, we were not at a milestone with an official financial statement, as Arian explained before regarding rejected deliverables. So maybe Ericsson was involved in some minor tasks and if this is the case they can claim for some costs. Regarding WP5 IoT, Ericsson worked with Telecom Italia to solve some issues regarding integration between GEs that were not solved for the review (there are some emails on this topic) and Ericsson attended also some weekly meeting especially to try to transfer their GE instance to another partner. For these actions they can claim some costs but certainly not the 3 PM they claimed And if they claim some costs we have also to check that everything is available for the project and the programme (documentation, software...) and currently one doc (Generic Device API) has disappeared from the wiki regarding the Gateway Device Management GE so in this case I cannot consider they have worked correctly but I'm waiting for details from Ericsson to give you a final answer. BR Thierry -----Message d'origine----- De?: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de depa at eng.it Envoy??: lundi 15 avril 2013 08:17 ??: Juanjo Hierro; fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet?: [Fiware-wpl] R: Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Dear Juanjo and colleagues, The position of Engineering is very simple. It was their unilateral decision to withdraw the project. They were not asked for any reason to do so nor the project changed its position or way of working thus making them impossible to stay in. On the contrary the create a certain damage to the consortium. When they withdraw they declare no more effort to be provided, again not a request from us. So if for whatever reason a wpl asked them to complete a certain work this must be recognised. For what pertains wp10 no effort provided in the concerned period. If all the other wpl declare the same nothing can be recognised to them. Ciao Stefano Le mail ti raggiungono ovunque con BlackBerry? from Vodafone! -----Original Message----- From: Juanjo Hierro Sender: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 01:45:58 To: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. From juan.bareno at atosresearch.eu Mon Apr 15 14:56:51 2013 From: juan.bareno at atosresearch.eu (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Juan_Bare=F1o_Guerenabarrena?=) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 14:56:51 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] [Fiware-wpl] R: Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) In-Reply-To: <516BF79A.8080205@tid.es> References: <516B3FB6.7000406@tid.es> <2044045062-1366006478-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-234744792-@b14.c14.bise7.blackberry> <4965_1366012236_516BB14C_4965_26_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C0D080E@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <516BF79A.8080205@tid.es> Message-ID: Dear All Regarding WP11: no activities were performed by Ericsson in the concerned period, so no costs claims will be accepted. Pending to confirm with NEC the contribution to the Standardization task, as soon as Lindsay answer my mail Br Juan Juan Bare?o Group Innovation, Business Development & Strategy Research & Innovation +34 912148859 Calle Albarrac?n 25, 28037 Madrid juan.bareno at atos.net www.atos.net From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juanjo Hierro Sent: lunes, 15 de abril de 2013 14:51 To: thierry.nagellen at orange.com Cc: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-wpl] R: Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Could all WPLs leading WPs where Ericsson intends to declare costs elaborate on how much, as maximum, they would be willing to accept as costs reported by Ericsson ? So far, based on gathered responses, I have: * WP5: Ericsson worked with Telecom Italia to solve some issues regarding integration between GEs that were not solved for the review (there are some emails on this topic) and Ericsson attended also some weekly meeting especially to try to transfer their GE instance to another partner. Thierry explained that these actions they can claim some costs but certainly not the 3 PM they claimed - However, we have to come with a specific proposal on how much would be acceptable (please see note in red below). * WP7: no activities were performed by Ericsson in the concerned period, so no costs claims will be accepted * WP9: Andrea mentions that since Nov 12 the only work done was related to the take over of the catalogue by UPM. Does this mean that you wouldn't accept any costs claims (in line with red note below) ? Please confirm * WP10: no effort was provided in the concerned period, therefore, no costs claims will be accepted Last but not least ... it seems like Ericsson doesn't declare costs regarding WP3 ... Can SAP clarify whether we are safe on WP3 ? In general terms, I believe we shoud tell Ericsson that they should not claim costs related to the take over of Ericsson's activities. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 15/04/13 09:50, thierry.nagellen at orange.com wrote: Dear all, I would just come back on the process to claim costs. Maybe I'm wrong but all partners have to provide their claimed costs to the coordinator for the project but at the end they are related to a contract between the partner and EC. This point is important to avoid any long discussion and because in many other projects if a partner decided to claim costs EC had lots of difficulties to reject them without very good reasons. When Ericsson decided to withdraw, we were not at a milestone with an official financial statement, as Arian explained before regarding rejected deliverables. So maybe Ericsson was involved in some minor tasks and if this is the case they can claim for some costs. Regarding WP5 IoT, Ericsson worked with Telecom Italia to solve some issues regarding integration between GEs that were not solved for the review (there are some emails on this topic) and Ericsson attended also some weekly meeting especially to try to transfer their GE instance to another partner. For these actions they can claim some costs but certainly not the 3 PM they claimed And if they claim some costs we have also to check that everything is available for the project and the programme (documentation, software...) and currently one doc (Generic Device API) has disappeared from the wiki regarding the Gateway Device Management GE so in this case I cannot consider they have worked correctly but I'm waiting for details from Ericsson to give you a final answer. BR Thierry -----Message d'origine----- De : fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de depa at eng.it Envoy? : lundi 15 avril 2013 08:17 ? : Juanjo Hierro; fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : [Fiware-wpl] R: Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Dear Juanjo and colleagues, The position of Engineering is very simple. It was their unilateral decision to withdraw the project. They were not asked for any reason to do so nor the project changed its position or way of working thus making them impossible to stay in. On the contrary the create a certain damage to the consortium. When they withdraw they declare no more effort to be provided, again not a request from us. So if for whatever reason a wpl asked them to complete a certain work this must be recognised. For what pertains wp10 no effort provided in the concerned period. If all the other wpl declare the same nothing can be recognised to them. Ciao Stefano Le mail ti raggiungono ovunque con BlackBerry? from Vodafone! -----Original Message----- From: Juanjo Hierro Sender: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 01:45:58 To: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu ; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu ; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. . ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 339 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 4064 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: From juan.bareno at atosresearch.eu Mon Apr 15 15:35:05 2013 From: juan.bareno at atosresearch.eu (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Juan_Bare=F1o_Guerenabarrena?=) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 15:35:05 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] [Fiware-wpl] R: Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) References: <516B3FB6.7000406@tid.es> <2044045062-1366006478-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-234744792-@b14.c14.bise7.blackberry> <4965_1366012236_516BB14C_4965_26_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C0D080E@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <516BF79A.8080205@tid.es> Message-ID: Dear All I just confirmed with NEC that regarding Standardization, task 11.4, no activities were performed by Ericsson in the concerned period Br Juan Juan Bare?o Group Innovation, Business Development & Strategy Research & Innovation +34 912148859 Calle Albarrac?n 25, 28037 Madrid juan.bareno at atos.net www.atos.net From: Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena Sent: lunes, 15 de abril de 2013 14:57 To: 'Juanjo Hierro'; thierry.nagellen at orange.com Cc: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: RE: [Fiware-wpl] R: Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Dear All Regarding WP11: no activities were performed by Ericsson in the concerned period, so no costs claims will be accepted. Pending to confirm with NEC the contribution to the Standardization task, as soon as Lindsay answer my mail Br Juan Juan Bare?o Group Innovation, Business Development & Strategy Research & Innovation +34 912148859 Calle Albarrac?n 25, 28037 Madrid juan.bareno at atos.net www.atos.net From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juanjo Hierro Sent: lunes, 15 de abril de 2013 14:51 To: thierry.nagellen at orange.com Cc: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-wpl] R: Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Could all WPLs leading WPs where Ericsson intends to declare costs elaborate on how much, as maximum, they would be willing to accept as costs reported by Ericsson ? So far, based on gathered responses, I have: * WP5: Ericsson worked with Telecom Italia to solve some issues regarding integration between GEs that were not solved for the review (there are some emails on this topic) and Ericsson attended also some weekly meeting especially to try to transfer their GE instance to another partner. Thierry explained that these actions they can claim some costs but certainly not the 3 PM they claimed - However, we have to come with a specific proposal on how much would be acceptable (please see note in red below). * WP7: no activities were performed by Ericsson in the concerned period, so no costs claims will be accepted * WP9: Andrea mentions that since Nov 12 the only work done was related to the take over of the catalogue by UPM. Does this mean that you wouldn't accept any costs claims (in line with red note below) ? Please confirm * WP10: no effort was provided in the concerned period, therefore, no costs claims will be accepted Last but not least ... it seems like Ericsson doesn't declare costs regarding WP3 ... Can SAP clarify whether we are safe on WP3 ? In general terms, I believe we shoud tell Ericsson that they should not claim costs related to the take over of Ericsson's activities. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 15/04/13 09:50, thierry.nagellen at orange.com wrote: Dear all, I would just come back on the process to claim costs. Maybe I'm wrong but all partners have to provide their claimed costs to the coordinator for the project but at the end they are related to a contract between the partner and EC. This point is important to avoid any long discussion and because in many other projects if a partner decided to claim costs EC had lots of difficulties to reject them without very good reasons. When Ericsson decided to withdraw, we were not at a milestone with an official financial statement, as Arian explained before regarding rejected deliverables. So maybe Ericsson was involved in some minor tasks and if this is the case they can claim for some costs. Regarding WP5 IoT, Ericsson worked with Telecom Italia to solve some issues regarding integration between GEs that were not solved for the review (there are some emails on this topic) and Ericsson attended also some weekly meeting especially to try to transfer their GE instance to another partner. For these actions they can claim some costs but certainly not the 3 PM they claimed And if they claim some costs we have also to check that everything is available for the project and the programme (documentation, software...) and currently one doc (Generic Device API) has disappeared from the wiki regarding the Gateway Device Management GE so in this case I cannot consider they have worked correctly but I'm waiting for details from Ericsson to give you a final answer. BR Thierry -----Message d'origine----- De : fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de depa at eng.it Envoy? : lundi 15 avril 2013 08:17 ? : Juanjo Hierro; fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : [Fiware-wpl] R: Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Dear Juanjo and colleagues, The position of Engineering is very simple. It was their unilateral decision to withdraw the project. They were not asked for any reason to do so nor the project changed its position or way of working thus making them impossible to stay in. On the contrary the create a certain damage to the consortium. When they withdraw they declare no more effort to be provided, again not a request from us. So if for whatever reason a wpl asked them to complete a certain work this must be recognised. For what pertains wp10 no effort provided in the concerned period. If all the other wpl declare the same nothing can be recognised to them. Ciao Stefano Le mail ti raggiungono ovunque con BlackBerry? from Vodafone! -----Original Message----- From: Juanjo Hierro Sender: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 01:45:58 To: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu ; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu ; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. . ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 339 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 4064 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: From WOLFSTAL at il.ibm.com Mon Apr 15 17:46:29 2013 From: WOLFSTAL at il.ibm.com (Yaron Wolfsthal) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 18:46:29 +0300 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] R: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) In-Reply-To: <2044045062-1366006478-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-234744792-@b14.c14.bise7.blackberry> References: <516B3FB6.7000406@tid.es> <2044045062-1366006478-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-234744792-@b14.c14.bise7.blackberry> Message-ID: Well said. Fully agree (and IBM does not have any interaction with Ericsson to report). Reg-Yaron From: depa at eng.it To: Juanjo Hierro , fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu, "fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu" , "fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu" , "fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu" , Date: 15/04/2013 05:57 PM Subject: [Fiware-pcc] R: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Sent by: fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu Dear Juanjo and colleagues, The position of Engineering is very simple. It was their unilateral decision to withdraw the project. They were not asked for any reason to do so nor the project changed its position or way of working thus making them impossible to stay in. On the contrary the create a certain damage to the consortium. When they withdraw they declare no more effort to be provided, again not a request from us. So if for whatever reason a wpl asked them to complete a certain work this must be recognised. For what pertains wp10 no effort provided in the concerned period. If all the other wpl declare the same nothing can be recognised to them. Ciao Stefano Le mail ti raggiungono ovunque con BlackBerry? from Vodafone! -----Original Message----- From: Juanjo Hierro Sender: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 01:45:58 To: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl _______________________________________________ Fiware-pcc mailing list Fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-pcc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Mon Apr 15 19:44:45 2013 From: nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu (Nuria De-Lama Sanchez) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 19:44:45 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] URGENT FI-WARE Representative for Porto (April 22)_FIF National Workshops = raising interest among relevant stakeholders for FI-PPP Phase 3 Message-ID: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A01F0FC11@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> Hi all, As a follow up of the last e-mails I have circulated about the FIF National Workshops find below a reporting of the results from the event held in Turkey last week (where Jorge Pereira from the EC made the FI-WARE presentation in our absence) and the urgent reminder of confirming the speaker for the Porto workshop. The Porto event will be on April 22 and Jorge needs and answer ASAP. Remember, it will be a 30 minutes presentation more or less telling how to use FI-WARE GEs. You can take advantage of the presentations and material already prepared for the purpose of the FI-WARE Architecture Week of Madrid. Since I have to report the EC I would like to get the availability of each of the PCC members for the Porto event as well as the others so that we can assign the different FI-WARE members to the events. Please, do this ASAP (you only have to check the dates!!!!). I would be grateful if you could come back to me with an answer by this evening or tomorrow morning the latest and your confirmation (if possible) for the Porto event. Thanks in advance, Nuria de Lama Research & Innovation Representative to the European Commission T +34 91214 9321 F +34 91754 3252 nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atosresearch.eu es.atos.net From: Jorge.Pereira at ec.europa.eu [mailto:Jorge.Pereira at ec.europa.eu] Sent: domingo, 14 de abril de 2013 22:26 To: Nuria De-Lama Sanchez; jhierro at tid.es Cc: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu; Jorge.Pereira at ec.europa.eu Subject: RE: FIF National Workshops = raising interest among relevant stakeholders for FI-PPP Phase 3 Importance: High Hi Nuria, I would really appreciate a name for Porto, to finalize the programme. The only other event I can precise is the one in Hungary, 13 June in Budapest. Details will follow. The event in Dresden, Germany, was taken out of the list, as another event in Germany was already scheduled for the end of June in Berlin. You will get information on the other events form Arian. As for the Turkish event, there were over 40 participants in person, and the session was broadcast across the country. FI-WARE's presentation was well received. The discussions after the presentations were in Turkish, but the feedback I got was very positive. People are very interested. Best Regards, Jorge ---- ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 78 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 816 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: From nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Mon Apr 15 19:52:45 2013 From: nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu (Nuria De-Lama Sanchez) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 19:52:45 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] FIF National Workshops (list)_Your availability as FI-WARE speaker Message-ID: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A01F0FC1C@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> The list of FIF workshops at National level list uploaded here: http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/ict/netinnovation/call3-roadshow_en.html. Please, as I requested in my previous e-mail I need ALL PCC members to update me about your availability to make a FI-WARE presentation. Based on that we will share efforts. Remember that the Porto event is in the very short term and I have to give an answer to the EC by tomorrow. Therefore, answer about that one ASAP and please, be generous. This is for the benefit and impact of the project!!!! Nuria de Lama Research & Innovation Representative to the European Commission T +34 91214 9321 F +34 91754 3252 nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atosresearch.eu es.atos.net ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 78 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 816 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: From pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it Mon Apr 15 22:18:07 2013 From: pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it (Garino Pierangelo) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 22:18:07 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] R: [Fiware-wpl] URGENT FI-WARE Representative for Porto (April 22)_FIF National Workshops = raising interest among relevant stakeholders for FI-PPP Phase 3 In-Reply-To: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A01F0FC11@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> References: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A01F0FC11@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> Message-ID: Dear Nuria, unfortunately attending events with a short notice becomes impossible to me, due to restrictive company travel policies. Based on the workshop list, I could be available for the Belgian Workshop (16 May) and the Italian one (assuming it is organized mid-to-end June, i.e. not during the review meeting week). BR Pier Da: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] Per conto di Nuria De-Lama Sanchez Inviato: luned? 15 aprile 2013 19:45 A: fiware-pcc Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Oggetto: [Fiware-wpl] URGENT FI-WARE Representative for Porto (April 22)_FIF National Workshops = raising interest among relevant stakeholders for FI-PPP Phase 3 Priorit?: Alta Hi all, As a follow up of the last e-mails I have circulated about the FIF National Workshops find below a reporting of the results from the event held in Turkey last week (where Jorge Pereira from the EC made the FI-WARE presentation in our absence) and the urgent reminder of confirming the speaker for the Porto workshop. The Porto event will be on April 22 and Jorge needs and answer ASAP. Remember, it will be a 30 minutes presentation more or less telling how to use FI-WARE GEs. You can take advantage of the presentations and material already prepared for the purpose of the FI-WARE Architecture Week of Madrid. Since I have to report the EC I would like to get the availability of each of the PCC members for the Porto event as well as the others so that we can assign the different FI-WARE members to the events. Please, do this ASAP (you only have to check the dates!!!!). I would be grateful if you could come back to me with an answer by this evening or tomorrow morning the latest and your confirmation (if possible) for the Porto event. Thanks in advance, Nuria de Lama Research & Innovation Representative to the European Commission T +34 91214 9321 F +34 91754 3252 nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atosresearch.eu es.atos.net [cid:image002.gif at 01CE3A26.62B15480] From: Jorge.Pereira at ec.europa.eu [mailto:Jorge.Pereira at ec.europa.eu] Sent: domingo, 14 de abril de 2013 22:26 To: Nuria De-Lama Sanchez; jhierro at tid.es Cc: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu; Jorge.Pereira at ec.europa.eu Subject: RE: FIF National Workshops = raising interest among relevant stakeholders for FI-PPP Phase 3 Importance: High Hi Nuria, I would really appreciate a name for Porto, to finalize the programme. The only other event I can precise is the one in Hungary, 13 June in Budapest. Details will follow. The event in Dresden, Germany, was taken out of the list, as another event in Germany was already scheduled for the end of June in Berlin. You will get information on the other events form Arian. As for the Turkish event, there were over 40 participants in person, and the session was broadcast across the country. FI-WARE's presentation was well received. The discussions after the presentations were in Turkish, but the feedback I got was very positive. People are very interested. Best Regards, Jorge ---- ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [cid:00000000000000000000000000000003 at TI.Disclaimer]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non ? necessario. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 78 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 816 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 677 bytes Desc: logo Ambiente_foglia2.jpg URL: From GLIKSON at il.ibm.com Tue Apr 16 08:07:57 2013 From: GLIKSON at il.ibm.com (Alex Glikson) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 09:07:57 +0300 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] [Fiware-wpl] FIF National Workshops (list)_Your availability as FI-WARE speaker In-Reply-To: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A01F0FC1C@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> References: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A01F0FC1C@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> Message-ID: I will attend the event in Israel. Regards, Alex P.S. we can ask someone from Intel to cover the event in Dublin From: Nuria De-Lama Sanchez To: fiware-pcc , Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Date: 15/04/2013 08:52 PM Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FIF National Workshops (list)_Your availability as FI-WARE speaker Sent by: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu The list of FIF workshops at National level list uploaded here: http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/ict/netinnovation/call3-roadshow_en.html. Please, as I requested in my previous e-mail I need ALL PCC members to update me about your availability to make a FI-WARE presentation. Based on that we will share efforts. Remember that the Porto event is in the very short term and I have to give an answer to the EC by tomorrow. Therefore, answer about that one ASAP and please, be generous. This is for the benefit and impact of the project!!!! Nuria de Lama Research & Innovation Representative to the European Commission T +34 91214 9321 F +34 91754 3252 nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atosresearch.eu es.atos.net ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl [attachment "image001.gif" deleted by Alex Glikson/Haifa/IBM] [attachment "image002.gif" deleted by Alex Glikson/Haifa/IBM] -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/gif Size: 78 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/gif Size: 816 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Tue Apr 16 15:14:56 2013 From: nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu (Nuria De-Lama Sanchez) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 15:14:56 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] Confirmation of FI-WARE speakers for FIF National Workshops Message-ID: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A01F0FEF5@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> Thanks Alex, Pier, Based on your suggestions I confirm that IBM will be in the Israel workshop as well as in Dublin. Telecom Italia will take the leadership in Italy (may be supported by Engineering) and possibly Brussels. In the absence of more answers I have assigned partners to other workshops following the criterion of proximity (in general). For those workshops that have a date confirmed I would like you to provide me the concrete name of the speaker so that I can inform the EC for the agendas. If you are not happy with your assignment, please, come to me. Thierry, I would like France Telecom to attend the one in Porto. It is very much short term, but no one in Telef?nica can make it and I think you could play a very good role there. It is in one week (Monday of the following week); can you confirm? if any other colleague can make it, please, inform me as I already requested (SAP, Engineering...). 22 April, Portuguese Workshop, Porto PT (TBD) ? FT? 10 May, Future Internet Assembly, Dublin IE ? IBM 16 May, FIF Belgium Workshop, Brussels BE (TBA) ?Telecom Italia 30 May, FIF Spain Workshop, Madrid ES (TBA) ? Telef?nica (Atos supports if needed) 05 June, FIF Israel Workshop, Tel Aviv IL (TBA) ? IBM 13 June, FIF Hungary Workshop, Budapest HU (TBA) ? SAP ? 22 June, FIF Germany Workshop, Dresden DE (TBA) ? SAP, DT June, FIF Italy Workshop, IT (TBD) ? Telecom Italia, Engineering June, FIF Greece Workshop, GR (TBD) June, Dutch workshop, NL (TBD) June, FIF Poland Workshop (TBD) Thanks! Nuria de Lama Research & Innovation Representative to the European Commission T +34 91214 9321 F +34 91754 3252 nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atosresearch.eu es.atos.net From: Alex Glikson [mailto:GLIKSON at il.ibm.com] Sent: martes, 16 de abril de 2013 8:08 To: Nuria De-Lama Sanchez Cc: fiware-pcc; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-wpl] FIF National Workshops (list)_Your availability as FI-WARE speaker I will attend the event in Israel. Regards, Alex P.S. we can ask someone from Intel to cover the event in Dublin From: Nuria De-Lama Sanchez To: fiware-pcc , Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Date: 15/04/2013 08:52 PM Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FIF National Workshops (list)_Your availability as FI-WARE speaker Sent by: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu ________________________________ The list of FIF workshops at National level list uploaded here: http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/ict/netinnovation/call3-roadshow_en.html . Please, as I requested in my previous e-mail I need ALL PCC members to update me about your availability to make a FI-WARE presentation. Based on that we will share efforts. Remember that the Porto event is in the very short term and I have to give an answer to the EC by tomorrow. Therefore, answer about that one ASAP and please, be generous. This is for the benefit and impact of the project!!!! Nuria de Lama Research & Innovation Representative to the European Commission T +34 91214 9321 F +34 91754 3252 nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atosresearch.eu es.atos.net ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------_______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl [attachment "image001.gif" deleted by Alex Glikson/Haifa/IBM] [attachment "image002.gif" deleted by Alex Glikson/Haifa/IBM] ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 78 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 816 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Tue Apr 16 15:26:46 2013 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 15:26:46 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] Confirmation of FI-WARE speakers for FIF National Workshops In-Reply-To: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A01F0FEF5@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> References: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A01F0FEF5@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> Message-ID: dear nuria, porto for me is impossible as i have to be in brussels the following day (nessi sc). apologises ciao, stefano 2013/4/16 Nuria De-Lama Sanchez > Thanks Alex, Pier,**** > > ** ** > > Based on your suggestions I confirm that IBM will be in the Israel > workshop as well as in Dublin.**** > > Telecom Italia will take the leadership in Italy (may be supported by > Engineering) and possibly Brussels.**** > > ** ** > > In the absence of more answers *I have assigned partners to other > workshops* following the criterion of proximity (in general). For those > workshops that have a date confirmed I would like you to provide me the > concrete name of the speaker so that I can inform the EC for the agendas. > If you are not happy with your assignment, please, come to me.**** > > ** ** > > *Thierry, I would like France Telecom to attend the one in Porto. *It is > very much short term, but no one in Telef?nica can make it and I think you > could play a very good role there. It is in one week (Monday of the > following week); can you confirm?**** > > if any other colleague can make it, please, inform me as I already > requested (SAP, Engineering?).**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > 22 April, Portuguese Workshop, Porto PT (TBD) ? *FT?* > > 10 May, Future Internet Assembly, Dublin IE ? *IBM* > > 16 May, FIF Belgium Workshop, Brussels BE (TBA) ?*Telecom Italia* > > 30 May, FIF Spain Workshop, Madrid ES (TBA) ? *Telef?nica (Atos supports > if needed)* > > 05 June, FIF Israel Workshop, Tel Aviv IL (TBA) ? *IBM* > > 13 June, FIF Hungary Workshop, Budapest HU (TBA) ? *SAP ?* > > 22 June, FIF Germany Workshop, Dresden DE (TBA) ? *SAP, DT* > > June, FIF Italy Workshop, IT (TBD) ? *Telecom Italia, Engineering* > > June, FIF Greece Workshop, GR (TBD)**** > > June, Dutch workshop, NL (TBD) **** > > June, FIF Poland Workshop (TBD)**** > > ** ** > > Thanks!**** > > ** ** > > [image: cid:349045816 at 01072011-3195]**** > > *Nuria de Lama***** > > ** ** > > Research & Innovation **** > > Representative to the European Commission**** > > **** > > T +34 91214 9321**** > > F +34 91754 3252 **** > > nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu**** > > Albarrac?n 25**** > > 28037 Madrid**** > > Spain**** > > www.atosresearch.eu**** > > es.atos.net **** > > [image: cid:349045816 at 01072011-319C]**** > > ** ** > > *From:* Alex Glikson [mailto:GLIKSON at il.ibm.com] > *Sent:* martes, 16 de abril de 2013 8:08 > *To:* Nuria De-Lama Sanchez > *Cc:* fiware-pcc; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu > *Subject:* Re: [Fiware-wpl] FIF National Workshops (list)_Your > availability as FI-WARE speaker**** > > ** ** > > I will attend the event in Israel. > > Regards, > Alex > > P.S. we can ask someone from Intel to cover the event in Dublin > > > > From: Nuria De-Lama Sanchez > To: fiware-pcc , > Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu > Date: 15/04/2013 08:52 PM > Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FIF National Workshops (list)_Your > availability as FI-WARE speaker > Sent by: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu **** > ------------------------------ > > > > > The list of FIF workshops at National level list uploaded here: > http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/ict/netinnovation/call3-roadshow_en.html. > > Please, as I requested in my previous e-mail I need ALL PCC members to > update me about your availability to make a FI-WARE presentation. Based on > that we will share efforts. > Remember that the Porto event is in the very short term and I have to give > an answer to the EC by tomorrow. Therefore, answer about that one ASAP and > please, be generous. > > This is for the benefit and impact of the project!!!! > [image: cid:349045816 at 01072011-3195] > *Nuria de Lama* > > Research & Innovation > Representative to the European Commission > > T +34 91214 9321 > F +34 91754 3252 > nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu > Albarrac?n 25 > 28037 Madrid > Spain > www.atosresearch.eu > es.atos.net > [image: cid:349045816 at 01072011-319C] > **** > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended > solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive > this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. > As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos > group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although > the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, > the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and > will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. > > Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion > confidencial > destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente > pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. > Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar > inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. > Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos > no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun > compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas > partes. > Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor > no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera > danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-wpl mailing list > Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl > > [attachment "image001.gif" deleted by Alex Glikson/Haifa/IBM] [attachment > "image002.gif" deleted by Alex Glikson/Haifa/IBM] **** > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended > solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive > this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. > As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos > group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although > the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, > the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and > will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. > > Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion > confidencial > destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente > pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. > Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar > inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. > Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos > no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun > compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas > partes. > Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor > no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera > danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-pcc mailing list > Fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-pcc > > -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 78 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 816 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jhierro at tid.es Tue Apr 16 17:08:02 2013 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 17:08:02 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] Fwd: FI-WARE: Amendment 4 to be reviewed. In-Reply-To: <77A22C1085494D48B4018F06A40DB2C72FA08B77@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> References: <77A22C1085494D48B4018F06A40DB2C72FA08B77@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> Message-ID: <516D6952.4070204@tid.es> FYI, -- Juanjo -------- Original Message -------- Subject: FI-WARE: Amendment 4 to be reviewed. Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 16:35:01 +0200 From: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ To: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu CC: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA , "subsidies at tid.es" Dear Arian, please find enclosed the DRAFT version of the DoW. We are closing the split of the budget of NSN Germany yet. Please find enclosed a new version of excel file with the changes. It is a DRAFT version too due to same issue. DoW: http://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/25/2109/FI-WARE-DoW-Amendment4+-+v1+%28version+date-16-04-13%29+%28DRAFT%29.docx Excel: http://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/25/2111/FI-WARE+effort-budget-funding+-+Amendment+4+v31+%28DRAFT%29.xlsx Thank you for your contribution. BR Javier. De: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu [mailto:Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu] Enviado el: martes, 16 de abril de 2013 16:10 Para: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ Asunto: RE: EC Project 285248 - FI-WARE communication: Commission adopted on 14/12/2012 a decision regarding the implementation of FP7 grant agreements. If you can send me the Word DoW already, then please do so. Arian ________________________________ From: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ [mailto:jdps at tid.es] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2013 4:09 PM To: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Cc: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; subsidies at tid.es Subject: RE: EC Project 285248 - FI-WARE communication: Commission adopted on 14/12/2012 a decision regarding the implementation of FP7 grant agreements. Importance: High Dear Arian. It was closed and ready to send to you but yesterday NSN-G told me that they need to study again the split of their budget between NSN-G and NSNG1. As you know, they changed its legal name and now they are a new partner. If you prefer, I can send it right now for your review, taking in account that this point could be changed. Please, let me know. BR Javier. De: Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu [mailto:Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu] Enviado el: martes, 16 de abril de 2013 16:04 Para: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ CC: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; subsidies at tid.es Asunto: RE: EC Project 285248 - FI-WARE communication: Commission adopted on 14/12/2012 a decision regarding the implementation of FP7 grant agreements. Dear Javier, OK, thanks for informing us. Could you please let us know the status of the amendment? When do you plan to send me the updated DoW? Thanks, Arian ________________________________ From: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ [mailto:jdps at tid.es] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2013 3:26 PM To: ZWEGERS Arian (CNECT) Cc: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; subsidies at tid.es Subject: RE: EC Project 285248 - FI-WARE communication: Commission adopted on 14/12/2012 a decision regarding the implementation of FP7 grant agreements. Importance: High Dear Arian. Regretfully, I?ve checked the consortium and there is no consensus for Electronic-only signature and transmission of Form C and electronic-only transmission of certificates on financial statements and on methodology. BR Javier. De: CNECT-R3-COMMUNICATION at ec.europa.eu [mailto:CNECT-R3-COMMUNICATION at ec.europa.eu] Enviado el: lunes, 07 de enero de 2013 12:05 Para: jimenez at tid.es CC: CNECT-ICT-285248 at ec.europa.eu; Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu Asunto: EC Project 285248 - FI-WARE communication: Commission adopted on 14/12/2012 a decision regarding the implementation of FP7 grant agreements. [cid:part15.00000101.06060904 at tid.es] Dear Coordinator, This is to inform you that the Commission adopted on 14/12/2012 a decision regarding the implementation of FP7 grant agreements. 1. Entry into force of the new Financial Regulation Further to the entry into force of the new Financial Regulation (Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002) the following new rules will be applicable to this grant agreement as of 1 January 2013, with no need to amend the grant agreement (i.e no action is needed from the consortium): ? time-to-pay: the time limit allowed for making payments to beneficiaries is reduced to 30 days for the pre-financing and to 90 days for the interim and final payments; ? interest on pre-financing: the beneficiaries of EU funds will no longer be obliged to deposit pre-financing on interest-bearing bank accounts and to declare the interest yielded by these accounts. However please note that until 31/12/2012 the provisions regarding interest on pre-financing mentioned in the grant agreement will continue to apply. For example for an on-going project if the reporting period covers 1.6.2012 to 31.5.2013, only the interest on pre-financing which has been generated from 1.6.2012 to 31.12.2012 should be declared, no interest from 1.1.2013 to 31.5.2013. 2. Electronic-only signature and transmission of Form C and electronic-only transmission of certificates on financial statements and on methodology The Commission also decided to allow consortia of ongoig projects to opt for the application of the electronic-only signature and transmission of financial statements (Form C), and electronic-only transmission of certificates on financial statements and certificates on the methodology (Forms D and E). To this end beneficiaries must introduce a request for an amendment via the coordinator. Instructions on how to request such an amendment and the template amendment letter to be sent by the coordinator to the Commission are enclosed to the present email. Please note that before requesting such an amendment, you should make sure that all beneficiaries have nominated a LEAR empowered to assign the person(s) authorised to act as signatory/signatories of financial statements (forms C). Once the grant agreement is amended, the consortium shall transmit the reports and other deliverables through the coordinator to the Commission using the electronic exchange system set up by the Commission. In particular: ? Form C must be electronically signed and transmitted through the electronic exchange system by the authorised person(s) within the beneficiary's organisation. ? The certificates on the financial statements and the certificates on the methodology must be hand-signed by an authorised person of the auditing entity on paper and a scanned copy of the certificates shall be transmitted through the electronic exchange system. More information on these changes is included in the enclosed guidance note "FP7 Quick Information letter on the electronic-only transmission and signature of Form C and electronic-only transmission of certificates (Forms D and E)". Should you have any question regarding the present email please do not hesitate to contact the FP7 helpdesk at https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/page/contactus. Please inform the other benficiaries of this grant agreement about these changes. Enclosures - Instructions on how to request an amendment to your FP7 grant agreement in order to benefit from the abolition of paper-signed Forms C - Template amendment letter to be send by the coordinator to the Commission in order to request the application of the electronic-only signature and transmission of financial statements (Form C), and electronic-only transmission of certificates on financial statements and certificates on the methodology (Forms D and E) - FP7 Quick Information letter on the electronic-only transmission and signature of Form C and electronic-only transmission of certificates (Forms D and E) ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/png Size: 16638 bytes Desc: not available URL: From axel.fasse at sap.com Wed Apr 17 10:27:27 2013 From: axel.fasse at sap.com (Fasse, Axel) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 08:27:27 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] Organizational Announcement Message-ID: Dear Juanjo, Markus Heller (markus.heller at sap.com) has joined the FI-WARE team now and he will take over my responsibilities in FI-WARE to coordinate SAP-activities in the project and to act as WP3 Lead from 22.04.2013 on. Could you please take care that Markus is added to the WPL/WPA mailing list since I do not have the privileges to do so. You can remove my name from the related mailing lists effective beginning of May, e.g. 01.05.2013. I'd like to thank all of you for the excellent collaboration, the interesting discussions and the great support over the past months and I would like to ask you all to welcome Markus in his new role in the FI-WARE project. Best regards, Axel --------------------------- Axel Fasse Senior Researcher SAP Next Business and Technology SAP AG | Vincenz-Priessnitz-Str. 1 | 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany T +49 6227 7-52528 M +4915153858917 E axel.fasse at sap.com www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Wed Apr 17 12:09:43 2013 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 12:09:43 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] Announcement (confidential) of new FI-WARE benificiaries as a result of the third FI-WARE Open Call Message-ID: <516E74E7.90305@tid.es> Dear partners, First of all, let me point out that contents of this email should be handled confidentially. As many of you know, FI-WARE launched the 3rd Open Call targeted to design and implement an ambitious plan for the promotion and dissemination of FI-WARE (see http://www.fi-ware.eu/open-call/) I'm glad to say that the evaluation of proposals has finalized with the selection of a proposal submitted by a rather strong consortia formed by Futura Networks and Asociaci?n E3 Futura (organizers of the huge Campus Party event), Startup Weekend (who have developed a huge network of startups events around the world), OgilvyOne (one of the major Publicity and Marketing companies in the World and Europe), NLnet (who helped introduce internet in Europe and holds a high quality network of involved innovators and active developers) and the Chambers of Spain offering their to SME networks in Latin America and the EU. Please find attached the corresponding Evaluation Summary Report. Following open call procedures, the evaluation has been carried out by independent evaluators. Also following Open Call procedures, we have now to ask you if you have any objection to the incorporation of any of the mentioned companies/organizations as new beneficiaries in FI-WARE. Note that we are not asking your opinion about the result of the evaluation itself. That has been carried out by the independent evaluators. We are just asking you whether you have any objection regarding any of the selected beneficiaries. Deadline for raising objections is this Friday EOB. If you are interested in getting a private copy of the proposal, please let me know. We will distribute it to the whole consortia as soon as we officially communicate the final result and call the selected beneficiaries for negotiations (next Monday). In the meantime, we want to have distribution of the proposal under control. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Consensus Evaluation Form - EDE_final.xlsx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet Size: 14018 bytes Desc: not available URL: From juan.bareno at atosresearch.eu Wed Apr 17 19:07:36 2013 From: juan.bareno at atosresearch.eu (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Juan_Bare=F1o_Guerenabarrena?=) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 19:07:36 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] WP11 Deliverables Submission Roadmap for M24 Message-ID: Dear Colleagues Following with the submission of Exploitation Deliverables on M24, I enclosed you the following roadmap and the inputs needed to include in each deliverable according to the last comments and recommendations from the last review on M18. Please feel free to suggest some indications or solutions to address the issues identified in each deliverable, based on the recommendations provided by the reviewers. For this work, we are going to leverage on the following draft documents: - 11.1.2- Market Analysis o Rise on 3rd party platforms and Economy of Internet Apps ? Business Opportunities by Tech (Cloud, Big Data, IoT, USDL...and GE combinations) ? Business Opportunities by Sector/Industry (Smart Cities, Smart Industry (Grid, logistics, health....) and Smart Home) o The new basis of competition and the superiority of ecosystem economics ? The superiority of ecosystem economics ? Ecosystems as a new distribution channel ? Ecosystem engineering ? What is the correct service ecosystem approach with startups and first "external" users of an ICT platform? o The biggest challenges for app businesses (and what to do about them) o The success factors for app store-like platform businesses from the perspective of third-party developers o European Context and trends (barriers, policy...) - First Draft of the Whitepaper about Product Vision for identify main use case scenarios and demonstrate the main advantages offered by FI WARE in each domain and identify the main and more potential instances or combinations of GE (PaaS+Big Data, IoT+Big Data.....)- Any advance on this whitepaper? ? What GEs can be used in combinations with what other GEs? ? Do certain GEs force you to use other GEs? ? How about interoperability? ? Where is the integration burden, with FI-WARE or the users? - Exploitation and business modeling position paper prepared together with CONCORD and that will be finished on April this month - Assessment of market traction of the relevant GEs in those specific domains of the emerging FI-PPP Phase 1- Feedback from UC questionnaire sent by FI WARE - Exploring Policy and Regulatory Challenges paper prepared together with CONCORD- Finished - Open Innovation Lab o Terms and Conditions- Status? o Establish the strategy and implementation plan to evolve the FI-WARE Testbed into the "backbone" of the Open Innovation Lab- Any advance on this side? - Third party developers' feedback to the available GEs - Third party Enablement deliverable new version- Is there a new version available? - European Patent System- The policy context for IPR, including the latest development on the matter Resubmission Roadmap: All Deliverables sent on the 15th May - Monday 22nd April- I will send you an initial and significant completed draft of the following three deliverables trying to address the following recommendations provided by reviewers on M18: o D11.1.2 Market and Competition Analysis (M24) ? The consortium is urged to keep the parallel segment of Smart Business in dual focus with Smart Cities ? Specifically, ecosystem formation needs to be prioritized strategically ? The challenge for future versions is to apply the new insights to broaden and deepen the analysis of FI-WARE's own business ecosystem, and relate the present high level view of this ecosystem to the more specific analysis within the GE chapters ? Additionally, it would be useful to provide assessment of market traction of the relevant GEs in those specific domains of the FI-PPP Use Case projects ? From the conclusion of this document, it is clear that third party innovation enablement will be critical, and it is also intimately linked to building a critical mass for FI-WARE results. ? This theme should be further developed from a market and competitive perspective, in close synergy with and inputting directly to the forthcoming deliverables D2.5.2 and D2.5.3 regarding third party uptake o D11.2.2 Exploitation Plan, including IPR Management (M24) ? Providing usage scenarios, potential usage patterns (including the 'typical' combined use of GEs), an overview of the status of available GEs including level of Use Case interest, a clear schedule of future GE Releases ? Give due and sufficient business consideration to the competitiveness of the GEs with respect to their market benchmarking, innovation potential and attractiveness) for both business and development communities. ? Focus on applying 'promising' technologies such as USDL and high impact areas such as IoT. ? Provide additional analysis and target promising business ecosystems for GE uptake, beyond Smart Cities. ? Provide clear evidence of business planning in the targeted areas through (combined) implementation of GEs. ? As a specific suggestion, the market potential of the individual GEs or groupings of GEs could be even more sharply indicated, and possibly even contrasted and prioritized ? OIL description ? A significant number of critical issues have to be addressed that will ultimately respond to the third party question "Why and how FI-WARE is going to help me to innovate?" o From a practical standpoint more detail is required relating to access, licensing and utilization rights. o Also not yet appropriately addressed is the topic of packaging in terms of what the application developer can access to build FI solutions, such as a starter-kit. ? The concrete offering and strategy towards attracting relevant communities remains unclear. ? Fostering developer communities fall within the scope of Open Call 3 (launched in December 2012). This however does not mean that present partners can derogate all responsibilities of involving potential users and stakeholders to the future Open Call 3 partners ? IPR Management: Regarding a possible integration strategy, the Month 15 Whitepaper about common usage scenarios (and potential usage patterns) for the GEs is long overdue. The issue was also raised by some of the new Phase 2 projects: ? What GEs can be used in combinations with what other GEs? ? Do certain GEs force you to use other GEs? ? How about interoperability? ? Where is the integration burden, with FI-WARE or the users? ? Establish the strategy and implementation plan to evolve the FI-WARE Testbed into the "backbone" of the Open Innovation Lab, in collaboration and synergy with the upcoming FIPPP Phase 2 Capability Building project. o D11.3.2 Market and Policy Regulation Awareness Report (M24) ? Further development of the issues and themes in Section 4.2 from 11.3.1.b is expected, among others, for the next version. ? The policy context for IPR, including the latest development on the European Patent System, would deserve greater attention in the next version ? It is also encouraging to see more consideration of the platform issues from a regulatory perspective, which should be deepened in the next version o 11.4.3 Standardization (M27) ? Please provide feedback to the NEC requirements as an oral update has to be provided in the next review meeting (M24) - Wednesday 30th April- o To Review or complete the identified missing inputs and provide feedback about the three before mentioned deliverables 11.1.2, 11.2.2 and 11.3.2 o To Update of the individual exploitation plans into the wiki: ? Given that there is apparently no intention of joint exploitation between the industrial partners of FI-WARE, The industrial partners are especially urged to improve their own exploitation planning documentation, taking into account the analysis and conclusions reached at the general level ? Accordingly, Annex I must be fully updated to reflect the more tangible business view of the industrial partner and a lot more substantive in describing the planned integration of the FI-WARE outcomes into the mainstream business of the industrial partners. ? Especially at the industrial partner level, leading to concrete plans for fit-for-deployment FI-WARE instances and other productization opportunities ? Engagement FI WARE outcomes with your corporate strategy ? Also welcomed is the emphasis given on "open model", "open solution", "open services", "open innovation", "open ecosystem" etc. How to start an ecosystem or leverage existing ones remains to be answered though. Equally, what does 'openness' mean beyond marketing, and concretely how it is to be applied in corporate strategy such as on the FI-WARE instances, need to be clarified. ? One good example in this respect is the very specific description provided in the Orange presentation in Seville, which clearly explains how usage of several sets of FI-WARE results is linked to its corporate strategy in engaging with the evolution of the services market. ? In which ecosystems are you going to focus or prioritize. Specifically, ecosystem formation needs to be prioritized strategically. In this respect, we continue to encourage the industrial partners to more actively and extensively engage senior business management to be involved in the exploitation and impact creation activity of the project. - Friday 10th May- I will consolidate all the outputs and feedback received - Monday 13th and Tuesday 14th - Final review and validation will take place - Wednesday 15th May - We will send the final deliverables Thanks for your collaboration Juan Juan Bare?o Group Innovation, Business Development & Strategy Research & Innovation +34 912148859 Calle Albarrac?n 25, 28037 Madrid juan.bareno at atos.net www.atos.net ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 339 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 4064 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: From thierry.nagellen at orange.com Fri Apr 19 15:02:41 2013 From: thierry.nagellen at orange.com (thierry.nagellen at orange.com) Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 13:02:41 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] Announcement (confidential) of new FI-WARE benificiaries as a result of the third FI-WARE Open Call In-Reply-To: <516E74E7.90305@tid.es> References: <516E74E7.90305@tid.es> Message-ID: <31620_1366376562_51714072_31620_1904_1_976A65C5A08ADF49B9A8523F7F81925C0DD995@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> Dear all, Orange has no specific concern with these new partners, so we agree to involve them in Fi-Ware. BR Thierry Nagellen Program Manager Future Internet Orange Labs Networks & Carriers 905 rue Albert Einstein 06921 Sophia Antipolis Cedex +33 492 94 52 84 +33 679 85 08 44 De : fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de Juanjo Hierro Envoy? : mercredi 17 avril 2013 12:10 ? : fiware-ga at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc : fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : [Fiware-pcc] Announcement (confidential) of new FI-WARE benificiaries as a result of the third FI-WARE Open Call Dear partners, First of all, let me point out that contents of this email should be handled confidentially. As many of you know, FI-WARE launched the 3rd Open Call targeted to design and implement an ambitious plan for the promotion and dissemination of FI-WARE (see http://www.fi-ware.eu/open-call/) I'm glad to say that the evaluation of proposals has finalized with the selection of a proposal submitted by a rather strong consortia formed by Futura Networks and Asociaci?n E3 Futura (organizers of the huge Campus Party event), Startup Weekend (who have developed a huge network of startups events around the world), OgilvyOne (one of the major Publicity and Marketing companies in the World and Europe), NLnet (who helped introduce internet in Europe and holds a high quality network of involved innovators and active developers) and the Chambers of Spain offering their to SME networks in Latin America and the EU. Please find attached the corresponding Evaluation Summary Report. Following open call procedures, the evaluation has been carried out by independent evaluators. Also following Open Call procedures, we have now to ask you if you have any objection to the incorporation of any of the mentioned companies/organizations as new beneficiaries in FI-WARE. Note that we are not asking your opinion about the result of the evaluation itself. That has been carried out by the independent evaluators. We are just asking you whether you have any objection regarding any of the selected beneficiaries. Deadline for raising objections is this Friday EOB. If you are interested in getting a private copy of the proposal, please let me know. We will distribute it to the whole consortia as soon as we officially communicate the final result and call the selected beneficiaries for negotiations (next Monday). In the meantime, we want to have distribution of the proposal under control. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Apr 22 00:50:15 2013 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 00:50:15 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] Fwd: Re: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) In-Reply-To: <51746C56.9000305@tid.es> References: <51746C56.9000305@tid.es> Message-ID: <51746D27.3000909@tid.es> Dear colleagues, For your info, please find enclosed our response to the mail sent by Herink Abramowicz from Ericsson regarding their request to report PMs beyond the limits that we had decided to accept (very generously in my opinon, I have to say, as explained to Henrik in the attached mail). If you believe there was something wrong or not accurate in our message, I happy to hear your opinion. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 00:46:46 +0200 From: Juanjo Hierro To: Henrik Abramowicz CC: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ , LUIS GARCIA GARCIA , "subsidies at tid.es" , Anders Casp?r , "jhierro >> \"Juan J. Hierro\"" Dear Henrik, It was Ericsson's unilateral decision to withdraw the project. You were not asked for any reason to do so nor the project changed its position or way of working thus making you impossible to stay in. On the contrary, Ericsson's decision put the project into real trouble. After double-checking with all the WP leaders where Ericsson was involved, our position doesn't change: the 2,6 PMs we had planned to assign to Ericsson in addition to the PMs declared by Ericsson at month 18 are considered fair to cover your involvement until your withdrawal was officially communicated. Of course, you may report more PMs for that period but, following our obligation as coordinators, we will report to the EC whether we agree with the declared figures or not and certainly we won't agree with any declared costs beyond those we have already tell you. It will then be up to the EC to accept or reject your declared costs and we will adjust the planning of costs accordingly. Indeed, I remind you that some of the deliverables rejected in the 1st reporting period (which justified the rejection of costs reported for that period) were also rejected in the month 18 review. These included the Open Specifications of the IoT chapter (where Ericsson played a major role) and the FI-WARE Technical Roadmap which was made up from the contributions by all the partners (including Ericsson). Acceptance of PMs declared not only during the 2nd reporting period (months 13-24) but also the 1st reporting period (month 1-12) depends now on the extra efforts for recovering that are currently being made by rest of the partners regarding rejected deliverables. Reported costs linked to development of deliverables rejected in month 18 will be finally accepted only if those deliverables get accepted in the 2nd year review and this will be because of the merits of rest of the partners who had recovered without the help of Ericsson. Acceptance of costs declared by Ericsson until month 18 plus the additional 2,6 PMs would therefore be rather generous indeed. Regarding your comment on consent of any amendment, note that you are not considered a member of the consortium since you notified Ericsson's withdrawal, therefore we don't need to get Ericsson's consent for any amendment we are implementing after Ericsson has withdrawn from the project. It's up to us to decide how planning of PMs can be realistically declared based on input from the WP leaders and taking into account the status of the project after the month 12 and month 18 project reviews. Best regards, -- Juanjo Hierro ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 15/04/13 19:51, Henrik Abramowicz wrote: Dear Javier et al, We have been checking the time reporting and you were right that it did not reflect the actual work done in that month due to that our time reporting system certain months can come up with higher pms than planned. This is because it covers the last Quarter and there is lagging in time reporting which sometime means that the previous time reporting shows up later and adds up to the current month . This is actually true for most of our activities that the time reporting is lagging. I don?t think this is unusual. We announced the withdrawal in January For WP 5 Thierry should I have been told by our people that we have not really reported so much time as we could have in general. I believe Thierry is aware of it. End of last year there quite a lot of support of Telecom Italia for a demo and integration on the cloud infrastructure. For WP 9 we had further development and bug-fixing of the catalogue but also a lot of support to users, preparations of webinars and actual execution of them Documentation and competence transfer to UPM . For WP 10 we contributed on some of the deployment. I don't believe we are blocking anything but you need to have explicit consent by us for any amendment. I hope this answers the questions BR Henrik From: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ [mailto:jdps at tid.es] Sent: den 15 april 2013 11:36 To: Henrik Abramowicz Cc: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; LUIS GARCIA GARCIA; subsidies at tid.es Subject: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Importance: High Dear Henrik, as Coordinator we cannot accept your proposal, and for last time, I would ask you again to reconsider your situation to avoid sending this information to Commission in order to solve the blocking of the amendment 4. 1.- Coordinator and Chief Architect, and WPLs knows that Ericsson withdraws the project after review M18. 2.- It is no legal to declare 1,7 PM of Jakob Saros on Dec 12. If he has worked full time, it should be 1 PM. Please check your recording systems because this is a fatal error in an audit. 3.- It is no legal to declare 1,5 PM of Vlasios Tsiatsis on Dec 12. If he has worked full time, it should be 1 PM. Again, please check your recording systems because this is a fatal error in an audit. 4.- We have checked WPL and they don't agree with the Ericsson's contribution from November 12 you said. * FT says as coordinator of WP5 that "They cannot validate around 3 months without any contribution to a deliverable and no new software release." * E-IIS says as coordinator of WP9 that "I do confirm that since Nov 12 the only work done was related to the take over of the catalogue by UPM". * E-IIs says as coordinator of WP10 that "No effort provided in the concerned period". 5.- You have been receiving all the e-mail about the complex amendments where is implicit the withdrawal of Ericsson an you have no said nothing against. 6.- Regarding your current declared effort: [cid:part9.05030804.07080402 at tid.es] That means that there could be up to 2,6 PM to compensate/minimize the impact of your unilateral withdrawal from the project and could be explained because Ericsson has been involved in some minor tasks too, so if this is true, you could claim these costs. Although I and WPL have asked you, you have no provided any information about the carried out work since November 2012 to December 2012, so, I think these costs will be rejected by Commission. 7.- Last by not least, as you know (it is stated in the documentation provided in the amendment), there are other partners who are going to receive the remaining budget in order to carry out the work. The project will have a big problem if the new committed budget has to be negotiated again. Please, let me know if you agree. Please, I would like you to answer us today. Note: If you agree, I kindly ask you again to provide the requested withdrawal letter by tomorrow. BR Javier. De: Henrik Abramowicz [mailto:henrik.abramowicz at ericsson.com] Enviado el: viernes, 12 de abril de 2013 16:53 Para: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ CC: subsidies at tid.es; Alen Jusufbasic; Magnus Karlsson E; Anders Casp?r; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; thierry.nagellen at orange.com; Andrea Manieri (manieri at eng.it); 'stefano.depanfilis at eng.it' (stefano.depanfilis at eng.it) Asunto: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Dear all, Please also find the breakdown of Person Months per month as requested which means that no work was performed in 2013 BR Henrik PM/WP WP 5 WP 9 WP 10 TOTAL Henrik Abramowicz Total 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 Nov 12 Dec 12 Jan 13 Jakob Saros Total 2,7 2,7 Nov 12 0,9 Dec 12 1,7 Jan H?ller Total 0,1 0,1 Dec 12 0,1 John Sandberg Total 1,2 1,2 Nov 12 0,9 Dec 12 0,3 Marika St?lnacke Total 0,2 0,4 0,5 Nov 12 0,2 0,3 Dec 12 0,1 Torgny Johansson Total 0,5 0,5 Nov 12 0,3 Dec 12 0,2 Vlasios Tsiatsis Total 1,5 1,5 Dec 12 1,5 Total 4,2 1,8 0,4 6,4 From: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ [mailto:jdps at tid.es] Sent: den 12 april 2013 15:50 To: Henrik Abramowicz Cc: subsidies at tid.es; Alen Jusufbasic; Magnus Karlsson E; Anders Casp?r; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; thierry.nagellen at orange.com; Andrea Manieri (manieri at eng.it); 'stefano.depanfilis at eng.it' (stefano.depanfilis at eng.it) Subject: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Henrik, I understand that you are talking about November 2012, and that means that you didn't work later in FI-WARE project. If not, please let me know. Please provide justifications of this effort. BR Javier. De: Henrik Abramowicz [mailto:henrik.abramowicz at ericsson.com] Enviado el: viernes, 12 de abril de 2013 15:38 Para: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ CC: subsidies at tid.es; Alen Jusufbasic; Magnus Karlsson E; Anders Casp?r; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; thierry.nagellen at orange.com; Andrea Manieri (manieri at eng.it); 'stefano.depanfilis at eng.it' (stefano.depanfilis at eng.it) Asunto: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Dear Javier et al I got these figures from our controller below Hope this helps BR Henrik WP 5 WP 9 WP 10 TOTAL Henrik Abramowicz Total 0 0 0 0,0 Jakob Saros Total 2,7 0 2,7 Jan H?ller Total 0,1 0 0,1 John Sandberg Total 0 1,2 1,2 Marika St?lnacke Total 0 0,2 0,4 0,5 Torgny Johansson Total 0 0,5 0,5 Vlasios Tsiatsis Total 1,5 0 1,5 Total 4,2 1,8 0,4 6,4 From: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ [mailto:jdps at tid.es] Sent: den 12 april 2013 15:36 To: Henrik Abramowicz Cc: subsidies at tid.es; Alen Jusufbasic; Magnus Karlsson E; Anders Casp?r; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; thierry.nagellen at orange.com; Andrea Manieri (manieri at eng.it); 'stefano.depanfilis at eng.it' (stefano.depanfilis at eng.it) Subject: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Importance: High Dear Henrik, we need to close this by Monday because it is blocking the amendment 4. Please, before sending your data to Coordinator, I kindly ask you to get a consensus with each WPL, in CC. WP5 (FT) -> Thierry Nagallen WP9, WP10 (E-IIS) -> Andrea Manieri & Stefano de Panfilis. As I told you, the current information is that Ericsson finished its contribution to FI-WARE project on M18, October 2012. Dear WPL, Ericsson says that they have been contributing to FI-WARE project since November 2012 as follows: WP 5 440 hours Wp 9 131,75 hours Wp 10 97 hours I kindly ask you to let us know if you agree, after Ericsson has been provided the requested information in attached e-mail. BR Javier. De: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ Enviado el: viernes, 12 de abril de 2013 12:33 Para: 'Henrik Abramowicz' CC: subsidies at tid.es; Alen Jusufbasic; Magnus Karlsson E; Anders Casp?r; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA Asunto: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT ***) Importancia: Alta Henrik, please send your contribution in PM by month and by WP since November 1st, 2012, providing the justification of the work carried out. It will be sent to WPL and Juanjo to be reviewed. This is very urgent. BR Javier. ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 28078 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Apr 22 12:39:31 2013 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 12:39:31 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] FI-PPP SB Meeting on 24th April In-Reply-To: <6385A09D-2C24-48B7-AE77-0B18684F890E@eurescom.eu> References: <6385A09D-2C24-48B7-AE77-0B18684F890E@eurescom.eu> Message-ID: <51751363.70205@tid.es> Dear all, The next FI-PPP SB meeting will take place on April 24th. I didn't know about this until last Friday, when I discovered that apparently I was not listed in the SB mailing list (nor anyone else from FI-WARE). Most probably, the mistake was that Jose Jim?nez was still there listed as contact and nobody took care of updating the info. I reported the issue to CONCORD and notified them that the situation meant that the FI-WARE project had not been able to analyze nor internally discuss any of the agenda points following the 2-weeks rule, therefore we wouldn't have any mandate to deal with decisions (see mails below). Nevertheless, looking at the agenda (see it attached) it seems like no relevant decision will be discussed/taken and the meeting will mostly serve as kind of kick-off of the new SB involving new projects. I have also attached the minutes of the last FI-PPP meeting which I also received last Friday. Last but not least, we have to appoint a second representative of FI-WARE in the FI-PPP SB, same way we agreed for the second representative in the FI-PPP AB (and Stefano was elected). I will call for a urgent FI-WARE PCC to deal with this and other matters. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [CONCORD] Agenda for FI-PPP SB Meeting on 24th April Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 03:23:26 +0000 From: David Kennedy To: Hierro Sureda Juan Jos? Hi Juanjo, you are in the list but obviously something is wrong. We will sort it out immediately, David Sent from my iPhone On 19.04.2013, at 00:02, "Juanjo Hierro" wrote: > Dear David, > > Apparently, I'm not in the SB mailing list despite I am both the > chairman of the FI-PPP AB and the coordinator of FI-WARE ... > > Therefore, I haven't received any invitation to the confcall nor a > copy of the agenda or minutes. Note that this means that the FI-WARE > project has not been able to analyze nor internally discuss any of the > points following the 2-weeks rule ... > > What should we do ? > > Best regards, > > -- Juanjo > > > > ________________________________ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx . ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FIPPPSteeringBoardMinutes2013-2.pdf Type: application/forcedownload Size: 255778 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: FI-PPP SB_April 25 2013_Draft agenda_Revision 2.doc Type: application/msword Size: 57344 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Mon Apr 22 12:56:10 2013 From: nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu (Nuria De-Lama Sanchez) Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 12:56:10 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] FI-PPP SB Meeting on 24th April In-Reply-To: <51751363.70205@tid.es> References: <6385A09D-2C24-48B7-AE77-0B18684F890E@eurescom.eu> <51751363.70205@tid.es> Message-ID: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A01F6C486@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> Hi all, I got the minutes but I think that the date of the next SB was fixed since long time ago (or at least I have it in my agenda, but it may be possible that Pepe was representing Telefonica at the SB at that time). Another SB will be held shortly, but this time a physical one (May 23), even though I think the place was not confirmed (if I remember well this was discussed in Telefonica last time). On the other hand Petra Turkama, from CONCORD, sent an e-mail to me asking for the contact information of all the FI-WARE representatives in the different boards and Working groups and I filled in the excel with the information of representatives appointed so far in Phase I, since I was not aware this was going to change now. Juanjo, I included you in CC in this e-mail, since I was not sure if the SB would be attended by you or not. Nuria de Lama Research & Innovation Representative to the European Commission T +34 91214 9321 F +34 91754 3252 nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atosresearch.eu es.atos.net From: fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juanjo Hierro Sent: lunes, 22 de abril de 2013 12:40 To: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-pcc] FI-PPP SB Meeting on 24th April Dear all, The next FI-PPP SB meeting will take place on April 24th. I didn't know about this until last Friday, when I discovered that apparently I was not listed in the SB mailing list (nor anyone else from FI-WARE). Most probably, the mistake was that Jose Jim?nez was still there listed as contact and nobody took care of updating the info. I reported the issue to CONCORD and notified them that the situation meant that the FI-WARE project had not been able to analyze nor internally discuss any of the agenda points following the 2-weeks rule, therefore we wouldn't have any mandate to deal with decisions (see mails below). Nevertheless, looking at the agenda (see it attached) it seems like no relevant decision will be discussed/taken and the meeting will mostly serve as kind of kick-off of the new SB involving new projects. I have also attached the minutes of the last FI-PPP meeting which I also received last Friday. Last but not least, we have to appoint a second representative of FI-WARE in the FI-PPP SB, same way we agreed for the second representative in the FI-PPP AB (and Stefano was elected). I will call for a urgent FI-WARE PCC to deal with this and other matters. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [CONCORD] Agenda for FI-PPP SB Meeting on 24th April Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 03:23:26 +0000 From: David Kennedy To: Hierro Sureda Juan Jos? Hi Juanjo, you are in the list but obviously something is wrong. We will sort it out immediately, David Sent from my iPhone On 19.04.2013, at 00:02, "Juanjo Hierro" wrote: > Dear David, > > Apparently, I'm not in the SB mailing list despite I am both the > chairman of the FI-PPP AB and the coordinator of FI-WARE ... > > Therefore, I haven't received any invitation to the confcall nor a > copy of the agenda or minutes. Note that this means that the FI-WARE > project has not been able to analyze nor internally discuss any of the > points following the 2-weeks rule ... > > What should we do ? > > Best regards, > > -- Juanjo > > > > ________________________________ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx . ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 78 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 816 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Apr 22 20:59:06 2013 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 20:59:06 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] URGENT and CRITICAL vote by the FI-WARE General Assembly: SAP veto on amendment 4 Message-ID: <5175887A.5000700@tid.es> Dear FI-WARE partners, I have to inform you that SAP has decided to issue a veto on the current amendment 4 currently under negotiation with the EC until a question on IPR management is solved. We committed to handle this issue raised during development of amendment 5 of the DoW which was going to be opened right after the current amendment is closed and we rather expect to finalize before end of May simply because there were elements there we know the EC consider of a rather high priority: incorporation of the new governance model and inclusion of additional beneficiaries from the 2nd Open Call and, more relevant for the EC, the 3rd Open Call. However SAP didn't want to rely on this compromise based on experience of the time consumed in previous amendments and decided to go for this veto, exploiting their right to issue it. I honestly believe we shouldn't spend too much time discussing whether this was a fair approach or not. This mail is then to cast your vote on the solution to handle the issue raised by SAP to be incorporated in amendment 4. In this mail, I will elaborate on: 1. The issue itself 2. The alternative solutions proposed by SAP and Telefonica 3. The process we will follow to make a decision and communicate it to the EC 1. The issue itself The issue is derived from a contradiction that has been detected by SAP on different places of the Grant Agreement (the contract). On one hand, the B.3.2.4 section on IPR included in the FI-WARE DoW (formally referred as Annex I of the Grant Agreement) states the following: [cid:part1.08040204.00010208 at tid.es] This paragraph was based on what we already stated in our proposal and was also requested by the EC. It was also aligned with clauses related to access rights to FI-WARE GE specifications and implementations in the FI-PPP Collaboration Agreement. However, special clause 41 in article 7 of the Grant Agreement states the following which apparently contradicts what was said in section B.3.2.4 of the DoW: [cid:part2.05040003.02040500 at tid.es] (for your knowlege, complementary beneficiaries refer to beneficiaries of other other projects different than FI-WARE in the FI-PPP). Besides this, there is article of the Grant Agreement that elaborates on what interpretation should prevail in case of conflicts between different parts of the Grant Agreement: [cid:part3.02060001.06070304 at tid.es] That would mean that what was stated in special clause 41 in article 7 would take precedence over what was stated in section B.3.2.4 of the DoW. It seems like it would be worth fixing this contradictions in an amendment of the DoW. 2. The alternative solutions proposed by SAP and Telefonica 2.1 Solution proposed by SAP The solution proposed by SAP is simple: drop the conflicting paragraph on section B.3.2.4. Consequently, users of FI-WARE in the context of the FI-PPP could be charged for the background that is integrated as part of a FI-WARE GE implementation or will be required for its execution. 2.2. Solution proposed by Telefonica Telefonica strongly believe that it has been stated multiple times, as basic principle of the program, that users of FI-WARE in the context of FI-PPP activities cannot be charged for any background or foreground that becomes part of a FI-WARE GE implementation. It can also confirm that the European Commission has stated multiple times that this was a requirement for the program. Therefore, it will never be accepted by the EC. Our proposal is also simple: * Fix special clause 41 so that it reads as follows (changes marked in red): Complementary beneficiaries enjoy the rights and bear the obligations of beneficiaries with regard to Articles II.32, II.33 and II.34 of Annex II {Access Rights}. However, for complementary beneficiaries, these rights and obligations are limited to foreground and background associated only to FI-WARE GE implementations developed in FI-WARE the project. Therefore, they do not extend to background that is not part of FI-WARE GE implementations or required for them to run. Complementary beneficiaries are not members of the consortium for the purpose of this grant agreement * Clarify paragraph in section B.3.2.4 of the DoW for the avoidance of doubt: Access Rights to Foreground and Background associated to FI-WARE GE implementations needed for the execution of the FI-PPP projects and users who carry out experiments in the FI-WARE Open Innovation Lab as long as the FI-WARE project lasts, shall be deemed granted on a Royalty-Free basis. Other than in exceptional circumstances and only for Background specifically identified, no costs shall be charged for granting such Access Rights. The FI-WARE beneficiaries will not charge any such costs to the project. 3. The process we will follow to make a decision and communicate it to the EC Given the fact that the two positions on the matter are irreconcilable, we should go for a voting. In this respect, partners will be asked to: * vote yes, no or abstain to each of the proposals * clarify whether they would issue a veto to a proposal if it happens to be endorsed by the majority of the partners For this purpose, the following doodle will be used. http://www.doodle.com/8r4rt8wnur5a7wh7 Those who wish to keep their vote visible in doodle please send your vote to me (or in response to recipients of this mail). We will list their vote in the doodle as "partner X" (X being a number). Voting will close this Friday at 12:00. Please don't forget to cast your vote. We will circulate an spreadsheet with the gathered votes by email on Friday afternoon and will close the doodle. Just to avoid any issue, we will give a period until Monday 12:00 to raise an issue if you believe that your vote was not properly recorded. Once we gather all the votes, we will apply voting accounting rules as stated in the FI-WARE Consortium Agreement, meaning that each Party shall have a number of votes equal to the percentage that its Project Share bears to the total of all the Project Shares of the Parties. Then we will announce the results to the consortia. Finally, based on the results of the process described above: * We will communicate to the EC the proposed changes in the Grant Agreement and require them to be part of amendment 4 * We will inform the EC about the partners (if any) who plan to veto amendment 4 because of the proposed changes If you have any questions regarding any of the points above, don't hesitate to ask. Best regards, -- Juanjo Hierro ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/png Size: 26719 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: dajhgbfb.png Type: image/png Size: 49073 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: djdjdhbb.png Type: image/png Size: 55743 bytes Desc: not available URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Tue Apr 23 11:14:30 2013 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 11:14:30 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: Re: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) In-Reply-To: <51746D27.3000909@tid.es> References: <51746C56.9000305@tid.es> <51746D27.3000909@tid.es> Message-ID: dear juanjo, ok for us. ciao, stefano 2013/4/22 Juanjo Hierro > Dear colleagues, > > For your info, please find enclosed our response to the mail sent by > Herink Abramowicz from Ericsson regarding their request to report PMs > beyond the limits that we had decided to accept (very generously in my > opinon, I have to say, as explained to Henrik in the attached mail). > > If you believe there was something wrong or not accurate in our message, > I happy to hear your opinion. > > Cheers, > > -- Juanjo > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website: www.tid.es > email: jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator > and Chief Architect > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website: http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > > > -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of > Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 > 00:46:46 +0200 From: Juanjo Hierro To: > Henrik Abramowicz CC: > JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ , LUIS GARCIA GARCIA > , "subsidies at tid.es" > , Anders Casp?r > , "jhierro >> > \"Juan J. Hierro\"" > > Dear Henrik, > > It was Ericsson's unilateral decision to withdraw the project. You were > not asked for any reason to do so nor the project changed its position or > way of working thus making you impossible to stay in. > > On the contrary, Ericsson's decision put the project into real trouble. > > After double-checking with all the WP leaders where Ericsson was > involved, our position doesn't change: the 2,6 PMs we had planned to assign > to Ericsson in addition to the PMs declared by Ericsson at month 18 are > considered fair to cover your involvement until your withdrawal was > officially communicated. > > Of course, you may report more PMs for that period but, following our > obligation as coordinators, we will report to the EC whether we agree with > the declared figures or not and certainly we won't agree with any declared > costs beyond those we have already tell you. It will then be up to the EC > to accept or reject your declared costs and we will adjust the planning of > costs accordingly. > > Indeed, I remind you that some of the deliverables rejected in the 1st > reporting period (which justified the rejection of costs reported for that > period) were also rejected in the month 18 review. These included the > Open Specifications of the IoT chapter (where Ericsson played a major role) > and the FI-WARE Technical Roadmap which was made up from the contributions > by all the partners (including Ericsson). Acceptance of PMs declared not > only during the 2nd reporting period (months 13-24) but also the 1st > reporting period (month 1-12) depends now on the extra efforts for > recovering that are currently being made by rest of the partners regarding > rejected deliverables. Reported costs linked to development of > deliverables rejected in month 18 will be finally accepted only if those > deliverables get accepted in the 2nd year review and this will be because > of the merits of rest of the partners who had recovered without the help of > Ericsson. Acceptance of costs declared by Ericsson until month 18 plus > the additional 2,6 PMs would therefore be rather generous indeed. > > Regarding your comment on consent of any amendment, note that you are > not considered a member of the consortium since you notified Ericsson's > withdrawal, therefore we don't need to get Ericsson's consent for any > amendment we are implementing after Ericsson has withdrawn from the > project. It's up to us to decide how planning of PMs can be realistically > declared based on input from the WP leaders and taking into account the > status of the project after the month 12 and month 18 project reviews. > > Best regards, > > -- Juanjo Hierro > > > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website: www.tid.es > email: jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator > and Chief Architect > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website: http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > On 15/04/13 19:51, Henrik Abramowicz wrote: > > Dear Javier et al, > > > > We have been checking the time reporting and you were right that it did > not reflect the actual work done in that month due to that our time > reporting system certain months can come up with higher pms than planned. > This is because it covers the last Quarter and there is lagging in time > reporting which sometime means that the previous time reporting shows up > later and adds up to the current month . This is actually true for most of > our activities that the time reporting is lagging. I don?t think this is > unusual. > > We announced the withdrawal in January > > For WP 5 Thierry should I have been told by our people that we have not > really reported so much time as we could have in general. I believe Thierry > is aware of it. End of last year there quite a lot of support of Telecom > Italia for a demo and integration on the cloud infrastructure. > > For WP 9 we had further development and bug-fixing of the catalogue but > also a lot of support to users, preparations of webinars and actual > execution of them Documentation and competence transfer to UPM . > > For WP 10 we contributed on some of the deployment. > > I don?t believe we are blocking anything but you need to have explicit > consent by us for any amendment. > > I hope this answers the questions > > BR > Henrik > > *From:* JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ [mailto:jdps at tid.es ] > *Sent:* den 15 april 2013 11:36 > *To:* Henrik Abramowicz > *Cc:* JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; LUIS GARCIA GARCIA; subsidies at tid.es > *Subject:* FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT > ***) > *Importance:* High > > > > Dear Henrik, as Coordinator we cannot accept your proposal, and for last > time, I would ask you again to reconsider your situation to avoid sending > this information to Commission in order to solve the blocking of the > amendment 4. > > > > 1.- Coordinator and Chief Architect, and WPLs knows that Ericsson withdraws the project after review M18. > > 2.- It is no legal to declare 1,7 PM of Jakob Saros on Dec 12. If he has > worked full time, it should be 1 PM. Please check your recording systems > because this is a fatal error in an audit. > > 3.- It is no legal to declare 1,5 PM of Vlasios Tsiatsis on Dec 12. If he > has worked full time, it should be 1 PM. Again, please check your recording > systems because this is a fatal error in an audit. > > 4.- We have checked WPL and they don?t agree with the Ericsson?s > contribution from November 12 you said. > > ? FT says as coordinator of WP5 that ?They cannot validate around > 3 months without any contribution to a deliverable and no new software > release.? > > ? E-IIS says as coordinator of WP9 that ?I do confirm that since > Nov 12 the only work done was related to the take over of the catalogue by > UPM?. > > ? E-IIs says as coordinator of WP10 that ?No effort provided in > the concerned period?. > > 5.- You have been receiving all the e-mail about the complex amendments > where is implicit the withdrawal of Ericsson an you have no said nothing > against. > > 6.- Regarding your current declared effort: > > > > > > That means that there could be up to 2,6 PM to compensate/minimize the > impact of your unilateral withdrawal from the project and could be > explained because Ericsson has been involved in some minor tasks too, so if > this is true, you could claim these costs. > > Although I and WPL have asked you, you have no provided any information > about the carried out work since November 2012 to December 2012, so, I > think these costs will be rejected by Commission. > > > > 7.- Last by not least, as you know (it is stated in the documentation > provided in the amendment), there are other partners who are going to > receive the remaining budget in order to carry out the work. The project > will have a big problem if the new committed budget has to be negotiated > again. > > > > Please, let me know if you agree. Please, I would like you to answer us > today. > > > > Note: If you agree, I kindly ask you again to provide the requested > withdrawal letter by tomorrow. > > > > BR > > Javier. > > > > *De:* Henrik Abramowicz [mailto:henrik.abramowicz at ericsson.com] > > *Enviado el:* viernes, 12 de abril de 2013 16:53 > > *Para:* JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ > *CC:* subsidies at tid.es; Alen Jusufbasic; Magnus Karlsson E; Anders > Casp?r; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; thierry.nagellen at orange.com; Andrea > Manieri (manieri at eng.it); 'stefano.depanfilis at eng.it' ( > stefano.depanfilis at eng.it) > *Asunto:* RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & > URGENT ***) > > > > Dear all, > > Please also find the breakdown of Person Months per month as requested > which means that no work was performed in 2013 > > BR > > Henrik > > > > > PM/WP > > > > > WP 5 > > WP 9 > > WP 10 > > > > TOTAL > > *Henrik Abramowicz Total* > > *0,0* > > *0,0* > > *0,0* > > *0,0* > > Nov 12 > > > > > > > Dec 12 > > > > > > > Jan 13 > > > > > > > *Jakob Saros Total* > > *2,7* > > > > *2,7* > > Nov 12 > > 0,9 > > > > > Dec 12 > > 1,7 > > > > > *Jan H?ller Total* > > *0,1* > > > > *0,1* > > Dec 12 > > 0,1 > > > > > *John Sandberg Total* > > > *1,2* > > > *1,2* > > Nov 12 > > > 0,9 > > > > Dec 12 > > > 0,3 > > > > *Marika St?lnacke Total* > > > *0,2* > > *0,4* > > *0,5* > > Nov 12 > > > 0,2 > > 0,3 > > > Dec 12 > > > > 0,1 > > > *Torgny Johansson Total* > > > *0,5* > > > *0,5* > > Nov 12 > > > 0,3 > > > > Dec 12 > > > 0,2 > > > > *Vlasios Tsiatsis Total* > > *1,5* > > > > *1,5* > > Dec 12 > > 1,5 > > > > > *Total* > > *4,2* > > *1,8* > > *0,4* > > *6,4* > > > > > > *From:* JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ [mailto:jdps at tid.es ] > *Sent:* den 12 april 2013 15:50 > > *To:* Henrik Abramowicz > *Cc:* subsidies at tid.es; Alen Jusufbasic; Magnus Karlsson E; Anders > Casp?r; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; thierry.nagellen at orange.com; Andrea > Manieri (manieri at eng.it); 'stefano.depanfilis at eng.it' ( > stefano.depanfilis at eng.it) > *Subject:* RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & > URGENT ***) > > > > Henrik, I understand that you are talking about November 2012, and that > means that you didn?t work later in FI-WARE project. > > If not, please let me know. > > > > Please provide justifications of this effort. > > > > BR > > Javier. > > > > > > *De:* Henrik Abramowicz [mailto:henrik.abramowicz at ericsson.com] > > *Enviado el:* viernes, 12 de abril de 2013 15:38 > *Para:* JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ > *CC:* subsidies at tid.es; Alen Jusufbasic; Magnus Karlsson E; Anders > Casp?r; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; thierry.nagellen at orange.com; Andrea > Manieri (manieri at eng.it); 'stefano.depanfilis at eng.it' ( > stefano.depanfilis at eng.it) > *Asunto:* RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & > URGENT ***) > > > > Dear Javier et al > > I got these figures from our controller below > > Hope this helps > > BR > > Henrik > > > > > WP 5 > > WP 9 > > WP 10 > > > > TOTAL > > *Henrik Abramowicz Total* > > 0 > > 0 > > 0 > > 0,0 > > *Jakob Saros Total* > > 2,7 > > 0 > > > 2,7 > > *Jan H?ller Total* > > 0,1 > > 0 > > > 0,1 > > *John Sandberg Total* > > 0 > > 1,2 > > > 1,2 > > *Marika St?lnacke Total* > > 0 > > 0,2 > > 0,4 > > 0,5 > > *Torgny Johansson Total* > > 0 > > 0,5 > > > 0,5 > > *Vlasios Tsiatsis Total* > > 1,5 > > 0 > > > 1,5 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *Total* > > 4,2 > > 1,8 > > 0,4 > > 6,4 > > > > > > *From:* JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ [mailto:jdps at tid.es ] > *Sent:* den 12 april 2013 15:36 > *To:* Henrik Abramowicz > *Cc:* subsidies at tid.es; Alen Jusufbasic; Magnus Karlsson E; Anders > Casp?r; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; thierry.nagellen at orange.com; Andrea > Manieri (manieri at eng.it); 'stefano.depanfilis at eng.it' ( > stefano.depanfilis at eng.it) > *Subject:* RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & > URGENT ***) > *Importance:* High > > > > *Dear Henrik*, we need to close this by Monday because it is blocking the > amendment 4. > > > > Please, before sending your data to Coordinator, I kindly ask you to get a > consensus with each WPL, in CC. > > > > WP5 (FT) -> Thierry Nagallen > > WP9, WP10 (E-IIS) -> Andrea Manieri & Stefano de Panfilis. > > > > As I told you, the current information is that Ericsson finished its > contribution to FI-WARE project on M18, October 2012. > > > > *Dear WPL*, Ericsson says that they have been contributing to FI-WARE > project since November 2012 as follows: > > WP 5 440 hours > > Wp 9 131,75 hours > > Wp 10 97 hours > > > > I kindly ask you to let us know if you agree, after Ericsson has been > provided the requested information in attached e-mail. > > > > BR > > Javier. > > > > > > *De:* JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ > *Enviado el:* viernes, 12 de abril de 2013 12:33 > *Para:* 'Henrik Abramowicz' > *CC:* subsidies at tid.es; Alen Jusufbasic; Magnus Karlsson E; Anders > Casp?r; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA > *Asunto:* RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT ***) > *Importancia:* Alta > > > > Henrik, please send your contribution in PM by month and by WP since > November 1st, 2012, providing the justification of the work carried out. > > It will be sent to WPL and Juanjo to be reviewed. > > This is very urgent. > > BR > > Javier. > > > ------------------------------ > > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace > situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > > ------------------------------ > > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace > situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > > ------------------------------ > > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace > situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace > situado m?s abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-wpl mailing list > Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl > > -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 28078 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Tue Apr 23 11:34:11 2013 From: nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu (Nuria De-Lama Sanchez) Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 11:34:11 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: Re: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) In-Reply-To: References: <51746C56.9000305@tid.es> <51746D27.3000909@tid.es> Message-ID: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A01F6C7E5@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> OK on behalf of Atos. Nuria de Lama Research & Innovation Representative to the European Commission T +34 91214 9321 F +34 91754 3252 nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atosresearch.eu es.atos.net From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of stefano de panfilis Sent: martes, 23 de abril de 2013 11:15 To: Juanjo Hierro Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: Re: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) dear juanjo, ok for us. ciao, stefano 2013/4/22 Juanjo Hierro Dear colleagues, For your info, please find enclosed our response to the mail sent by Herink Abramowicz from Ericsson regarding their request to report PMs beyond the limits that we had decided to accept (very generously in my opinon, I have to say, as explained to Henrik in the attached mail). If you believe there was something wrong or not accurate in our message, I happy to hear your opinion. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 00:46:46 +0200 From: Juanjo Hierro To: Henrik Abramowicz CC: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ , LUIS GARCIA GARCIA , "subsidies at tid.es" , Anders Casp?r , "jhierro >> \"Juan J. Hierro\"" Dear Henrik, It was Ericsson's unilateral decision to withdraw the project. You were not asked for any reason to do so nor the project changed its position or way of working thus making you impossible to stay in. On the contrary, Ericsson's decision put the project into real trouble. After double-checking with all the WP leaders where Ericsson was involved, our position doesn't change: the 2,6 PMs we had planned to assign to Ericsson in addition to the PMs declared by Ericsson at month 18 are considered fair to cover your involvement until your withdrawal was officially communicated. Of course, you may report more PMs for that period but, following our obligation as coordinators, we will report to the EC whether we agree with the declared figures or not and certainly we won't agree with any declared costs beyond those we have already tell you. It will then be up to the EC to accept or reject your declared costs and we will adjust the planning of costs accordingly. Indeed, I remind you that some of the deliverables rejected in the 1st reporting period (which justified the rejection of costs reported for that period) were also rejected in the month 18 review. These included the Open Specifications of the IoT chapter (where Ericsson played a major role) and the FI-WARE Technical Roadmap which was made up from the contributions by all the partners (including Ericsson). Acceptance of PMs declared not only during the 2nd reporting period (months 13-24) but also the 1st reporting period (month 1-12) depends now on the extra efforts for recovering that are currently being made by rest of the partners regarding rejected deliverables. Reported costs linked to development of deliverables rejected in month 18 will be finally accepted only if those deliverables get accepted in the 2nd year review and this will be because of the merits of rest of the partners who had recovered without the help of Ericsson. Acceptance of costs declared by Ericsson until month 18 plus the additional 2,6 PMs would therefore be rather generous indeed. Regarding your comment on consent of any amendment, note that you are not considered a member of the consortium since you notified Ericsson's withdrawal, therefore we don't need to get Ericsson's consent for any amendment we are implementing after Ericsson has withdrawn from the project. It's up to us to decide how planning of PMs can be realistically declared based on input from the WP leaders and taking into account the status of the project after the month 12 and month 18 project reviews. Best regards, -- Juanjo Hierro ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 15/04/13 19:51, Henrik Abramowicz wrote: Dear Javier et al, We have been checking the time reporting and you were right that it did not reflect the actual work done in that month due to that our time reporting system certain months can come up with higher pms than planned. This is because it covers the last Quarter and there is lagging in time reporting which sometime means that the previous time reporting shows up later and adds up to the current month . This is actually true for most of our activities that the time reporting is lagging. I don?t think this is unusual. We announced the withdrawal in January For WP 5 Thierry should I have been told by our people that we have not really reported so much time as we could have in general. I believe Thierry is aware of it. End of last year there quite a lot of support of Telecom Italia for a demo and integration on the cloud infrastructure. For WP 9 we had further development and bug-fixing of the catalogue but also a lot of support to users, preparations of webinars and actual execution of them Documentation and competence transfer to UPM . For WP 10 we contributed on some of the deployment. I don't believe we are blocking anything but you need to have explicit consent by us for any amendment. I hope this answers the questions BR Henrik From: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ [mailto:jdps at tid.es] Sent: den 15 april 2013 11:36 To: Henrik Abramowicz Cc: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; LUIS GARCIA GARCIA; subsidies at tid.es Subject: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Importance: High Dear Henrik, as Coordinator we cannot accept your proposal, and for last time, I would ask you again to reconsider your situation to avoid sending this information to Commission in order to solve the blocking of the amendment 4. 1.- Coordinator and Chief Architect, and WPLs knows that Ericsson withdraws the project after review M18. 2.- It is no legal to declare 1,7 PM of Jakob Saros on Dec 12. If he has worked full time, it should be 1 PM. Please check your recording systems because this is a fatal error in an audit. 3.- It is no legal to declare 1,5 PM of Vlasios Tsiatsis on Dec 12. If he has worked full time, it should be 1 PM. Again, please check your recording systems because this is a fatal error in an audit. 4.- We have checked WPL and they don't agree with the Ericsson's contribution from November 12 you said. ? FT says as coordinator of WP5 that "They cannot validate around 3 months without any contribution to a deliverable and no new software release." ? E-IIS says as coordinator of WP9 that "I do confirm that since Nov 12 the only work done was related to the take over of the catalogue by UPM". ? E-IIs says as coordinator of WP10 that "No effort provided in the concerned period". 5.- You have been receiving all the e-mail about the complex amendments where is implicit the withdrawal of Ericsson an you have no said nothing against. 6.- Regarding your current declared effort: That means that there could be up to 2,6 PM to compensate/minimize the impact of your unilateral withdrawal from the project and could be explained because Ericsson has been involved in some minor tasks too, so if this is true, you could claim these costs. Although I and WPL have asked you, you have no provided any information about the carried out work since November 2012 to December 2012, so, I think these costs will be rejected by Commission. 7.- Last by not least, as you know (it is stated in the documentation provided in the amendment), there are other partners who are going to receive the remaining budget in order to carry out the work. The project will have a big problem if the new committed budget has to be negotiated again. Please, let me know if you agree. Please, I would like you to answer us today. Note: If you agree, I kindly ask you again to provide the requested withdrawal letter by tomorrow. BR Javier. De: Henrik Abramowicz [mailto:henrik.abramowicz at ericsson.com ] Enviado el: viernes, 12 de abril de 2013 16:53 Para: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ CC: subsidies at tid.es; Alen Jusufbasic; Magnus Karlsson E; Anders Casp?r; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; thierry.nagellen at orange.com; Andrea Manieri (manieri at eng.it); 'stefano.depanfilis at eng.it' (stefano.depanfilis at eng.it) Asunto: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Dear all, Please also find the breakdown of Person Months per month as requested which means that no work was performed in 2013 BR Henrik PM/WP WP 5 WP 9 WP 10 TOTAL Henrik Abramowicz Total 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 Nov 12 Dec 12 Jan 13 Jakob Saros Total 2,7 2,7 Nov 12 0,9 Dec 12 1,7 Jan H?ller Total 0,1 0,1 Dec 12 0,1 John Sandberg Total 1,2 1,2 Nov 12 0,9 Dec 12 0,3 Marika St?lnacke Total 0,2 0,4 0,5 Nov 12 0,2 0,3 Dec 12 0,1 Torgny Johansson Total 0,5 0,5 Nov 12 0,3 Dec 12 0,2 Vlasios Tsiatsis Total 1,5 1,5 Dec 12 1,5 Total 4,2 1,8 0,4 6,4 From: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ [mailto:jdps at tid.es] Sent: den 12 april 2013 15:50 To: Henrik Abramowicz Cc: subsidies at tid.es; Alen Jusufbasic; Magnus Karlsson E; Anders Casp?r; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; thierry.nagellen at orange.com; Andrea Manieri (manieri at eng.it); 'stefano.depanfilis at eng.it' (stefano.depanfilis at eng.it) Subject: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Henrik, I understand that you are talking about November 2012, and that means that you didn't work later in FI-WARE project. If not, please let me know. Please provide justifications of this effort. BR Javier. De: Henrik Abramowicz [mailto:henrik.abramowicz at ericsson.com] Enviado el: viernes, 12 de abril de 2013 15:38 Para: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ CC: subsidies at tid.es; Alen Jusufbasic; Magnus Karlsson E; Anders Casp?r; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; thierry.nagellen at orange.com; Andrea Manieri (manieri at eng.it); 'stefano.depanfilis at eng.it' (stefano.depanfilis at eng.it) Asunto: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Dear Javier et al I got these figures from our controller below Hope this helps BR Henrik WP 5 WP 9 WP 10 TOTAL Henrik Abramowicz Total 0 0 0 0,0 Jakob Saros Total 2,7 0 2,7 Jan H?ller Total 0,1 0 0,1 John Sandberg Total 0 1,2 1,2 Marika St?lnacke Total 0 0,2 0,4 0,5 Torgny Johansson Total 0 0,5 0,5 Vlasios Tsiatsis Total 1,5 0 1,5 Total 4,2 1,8 0,4 6,4 From: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ [mailto:jdps at tid.es] Sent: den 12 april 2013 15:36 To: Henrik Abramowicz Cc: subsidies at tid.es; Alen Jusufbasic; Magnus Karlsson E; Anders Casp?r; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA; thierry.nagellen at orange.com; Andrea Manieri (manieri at eng.it); 'stefano.depanfilis at eng.it' (stefano.depanfilis at eng.it) Subject: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT & URGENT ***) Importance: High Dear Henrik, we need to close this by Monday because it is blocking the amendment 4. Please, before sending your data to Coordinator, I kindly ask you to get a consensus with each WPL, in CC. WP5 (FT) -> Thierry Nagallen WP9, WP10 (E-IIS) -> Andrea Manieri & Stefano de Panfilis. As I told you, the current information is that Ericsson finished its contribution to FI-WARE project on M18, October 2012. Dear WPL, Ericsson says that they have been contributing to FI-WARE project since November 2012 as follows: WP 5 440 hours Wp 9 131,75 hours Wp 10 97 hours I kindly ask you to let us know if you agree, after Ericsson has been provided the requested information in attached e-mail. BR Javier. De: JAVIER DE PEDRO SANCHEZ Enviado el: viernes, 12 de abril de 2013 12:33 Para: 'Henrik Abramowicz' CC: subsidies at tid.es; Alen Jusufbasic; Magnus Karlsson E; Anders Casp?r; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA Asunto: RE: FI-WARE: Withdrawal of Ericsson. (*** VERY IMPORTANT ***) Importancia: Alta Henrik, please send your contribution in PM by month and by WP since November 1st, 2012, providing the justification of the work carried out. It will be sent to WPL and Juanjo to be reviewed. This is very urgent. BR Javier. ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 78 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 816 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image003.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 28078 bytes Desc: image003.jpg URL: From juan.bareno at atosresearch.eu Wed Apr 24 19:40:09 2013 From: juan.bareno at atosresearch.eu (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Juan_Bare=F1o_Guerenabarrena?=) Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:40:09 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] FW: [Fiware-exploitation] WP11 Deliverables Submission Roadmap for M24 Message-ID: Dear Colleagues Please find here enclosed in the following link https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/index.php?group_id=16 and within the folder "Work Versions", "WP11 Final Deliverables M24" the following first draft deliverables, pending to complete and fine-tuning: - D11.1.2-Market and Competition Analysis _M24v2404 o The document describe the following: ? Rise on 3rd party platforms and Economy of Internet Apps ? Business Opportunities by Tech (Cloud, Big Data, IoT, USDL...and GE combinations) ? Business Opportunities by Sector/Industry (Smart Cities, Smart Industry (Grid, logistics, health....) and Smart Home) ? The new basis of competition and the superiority of ecosystem economics ? The superiority of ecosystem economics ? Ecosystems as a new distribution channel ? Ecosystem engineering ? What is the correct service ecosystem approach with startups and first "external" users of an ICT platform? ? The biggest challenges for app businesses (and what to do about them) ? The success factors for app store-like platform businesses from the perspective of third-party developers ? European Context and trends (barriers, policy...) o ACTION1: Please review Business Opportunities by domain (Cloud, Data, Iot....) and complete the identified missing inputs and provide feedback - Each WPL its domain and the rest helping, before 3rd of May - D11.2.2 Exploitation_Plan,_including_IPR_Managementv_M24v2404 o The document describe the following ? FI-WARE Product Vision by domain: Identify the main Generic Enablers+ FI-WARE Instances with most market potential ? FI WARE Market Positioning: GE Development Prioritization Matrix ? FI WARE IPR Management ? FI WARE Ecosystem Strategy and Business Model ? Individual Exploitation Plans o ACTION 2: Please review it Product Vision by domain (Cloud, Data, Iot....) and complete the identified missing inputs (Use Case Scenarios and Business Canvas) and provide feedback - Each WPL its domain and the rest helping, before 3rd of May o ACTION 3: To Update of the individual exploitation plans, last version from M18, into the document or into the wiki https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/exploitation/index.php/Individual- Each FI WARE Partner before 3rd of May "Given that there is apparently no intention of joint exploitation between the industrial partners of FI-WARE, The industrial partners are especially urged to improve their own exploitation planning documentation, taking into account the analysis and conclusions reached at the general level ? Accordingly, Annex I must be fully updated to reflect the more tangible business view of the industrial partner and a lot more substantive in describing the planned integration of the FI-WARE outcomes into the mainstream business of the industrial partners. ? Especially at the industrial partner level, leading to concrete plans for fit-for-deployment FI-WARE instances and other productization opportunities ? Engagement FI WARE outcomes with your corporate strategy o In which ecosystems are you going to focus or prioritize. Specifically, ecosystem formation needs to be prioritized strategically. In this respect, we continue to encourage the industrial partners to more actively and extensively engage senior business management to be involved in the exploitation and impact creation activity of the project" Thanks for your collaboration Juan Juan Bare?o Group Innovation, Business Development & Strategy Research & Innovation +34 912148859 Calle Albarrac?n 25, 28037 Madrid juan.bareno at atos.net www.atos.net From: fiware-exploitation-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-exploitation-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juan Bare?o Guerenabarrena Sent: mi?rcoles, 17 de abril de 2013 19:08 To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-exploitation at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-exploitation] WP11 Deliverables Submission Roadmap for M24 Dear Colleagues Following with the submission of Exploitation Deliverables on M24, I enclosed you the following roadmap and the inputs needed to include in each deliverable according to the last comments and recommendations from the last review on M18. Please feel free to suggest some indications or solutions to address the issues identified in each deliverable, based on the recommendations provided by the reviewers. For this work, we are going to leverage on the following draft documents: - 11.1.2- Market Analysis o Rise on 3rd party platforms and Economy of Internet Apps ? Business Opportunities by Tech (Cloud, Big Data, IoT, USDL...and GE combinations) ? Business Opportunities by Sector/Industry (Smart Cities, Smart Industry (Grid, logistics, health....) and Smart Home) o The new basis of competition and the superiority of ecosystem economics ? The superiority of ecosystem economics ? Ecosystems as a new distribution channel ? Ecosystem engineering ? What is the correct service ecosystem approach with startups and first "external" users of an ICT platform? o The biggest challenges for app businesses (and what to do about them) o The success factors for app store-like platform businesses from the perspective of third-party developers o European Context and trends (barriers, policy...) - First Draft of the Whitepaper about Product Vision for identify main use case scenarios and demonstrate the main advantages offered by FI WARE in each domain and identify the main and more potential instances or combinations of GE (PaaS+Big Data, IoT+Big Data.....)- Any advance on this whitepaper? ? What GEs can be used in combinations with what other GEs? ? Do certain GEs force you to use other GEs? ? How about interoperability? ? Where is the integration burden, with FI-WARE or the users? - Exploitation and business modeling position paper prepared together with CONCORD and that will be finished on April this month - Assessment of market traction of the relevant GEs in those specific domains of the emerging FI-PPP Phase 1- Feedback from UC questionnaire sent by FI WARE - Exploring Policy and Regulatory Challenges paper prepared together with CONCORD- Finished - Open Innovation Lab o Terms and Conditions- Status? o Establish the strategy and implementation plan to evolve the FI-WARE Testbed into the "backbone" of the Open Innovation Lab- Any advance on this side? - Third party developers' feedback to the available GEs - Third party Enablement deliverable new version- Is there a new version available? - European Patent System- The policy context for IPR, including the latest development on the matter Resubmission Roadmap: All Deliverables sent on the 15th May - Monday 22nd April- I will send you an initial and significant completed draft of the following three deliverables trying to address the following recommendations provided by reviewers on M18: o D11.1.2 Market and Competition Analysis (M24) ? The consortium is urged to keep the parallel segment of Smart Business in dual focus with Smart Cities ? Specifically, ecosystem formation needs to be prioritized strategically ? The challenge for future versions is to apply the new insights to broaden and deepen the analysis of FI-WARE's own business ecosystem, and relate the present high level view of this ecosystem to the more specific analysis within the GE chapters ? Additionally, it would be useful to provide assessment of market traction of the relevant GEs in those specific domains of the FI-PPP Use Case projects ? From the conclusion of this document, it is clear that third party innovation enablement will be critical, and it is also intimately linked to building a critical mass for FI-WARE results. ? This theme should be further developed from a market and competitive perspective, in close synergy with and inputting directly to the forthcoming deliverables D2.5.2 and D2.5.3 regarding third party uptake o D11.2.2 Exploitation Plan, including IPR Management (M24) ? Providing usage scenarios, potential usage patterns (including the 'typical' combined use of GEs), an overview of the status of available GEs including level of Use Case interest, a clear schedule of future GE Releases ? Give due and sufficient business consideration to the competitiveness of the GEs with respect to their market benchmarking, innovation potential and attractiveness) for both business and development communities. ? Focus on applying 'promising' technologies such as USDL and high impact areas such as IoT. ? Provide additional analysis and target promising business ecosystems for GE uptake, beyond Smart Cities. ? Provide clear evidence of business planning in the targeted areas through (combined) implementation of GEs. ? As a specific suggestion, the market potential of the individual GEs or groupings of GEs could be even more sharply indicated, and possibly even contrasted and prioritized ? OIL description ? A significant number of critical issues have to be addressed that will ultimately respond to the third party question "Why and how FI-WARE is going to help me to innovate?" o From a practical standpoint more detail is required relating to access, licensing and utilization rights. o Also not yet appropriately addressed is the topic of packaging in terms of what the application developer can access to build FI solutions, such as a starter-kit. ? The concrete offering and strategy towards attracting relevant communities remains unclear. ? Fostering developer communities fall within the scope of Open Call 3 (launched in December 2012). This however does not mean that present partners can derogate all responsibilities of involving potential users and stakeholders to the future Open Call 3 partners ? IPR Management: Regarding a possible integration strategy, the Month 15 Whitepaper about common usage scenarios (and potential usage patterns) for the GEs is long overdue. The issue was also raised by some of the new Phase 2 projects: ? What GEs can be used in combinations with what other GEs? ? Do certain GEs force you to use other GEs? ? How about interoperability? ? Where is the integration burden, with FI-WARE or the users? ? Establish the strategy and implementation plan to evolve the FI-WARE Testbed into the "backbone" of the Open Innovation Lab, in collaboration and synergy with the upcoming FIPPP Phase 2 Capability Building project. o D11.3.2 Market and Policy Regulation Awareness Report (M24) ? Further development of the issues and themes in Section 4.2 from 11.3.1.b is expected, among others, for the next version. ? The policy context for IPR, including the latest development on the European Patent System, would deserve greater attention in the next version ? It is also encouraging to see more consideration of the platform issues from a regulatory perspective, which should be deepened in the next version o 11.4.3 Standardization (M27) ? Please provide feedback to the NEC requirements as an oral update has to be provided in the next review meeting (M24) - Wednesday 30th April- o To Review or complete the identified missing inputs and provide feedback about the three before mentioned deliverables 11.1.2, 11.2.2 and 11.3.2 o To Update of the individual exploitation plans into the wiki: ? Given that there is apparently no intention of joint exploitation between the industrial partners of FI-WARE, The industrial partners are especially urged to improve their own exploitation planning documentation, taking into account the analysis and conclusions reached at the general level ? Accordingly, Annex I must be fully updated to reflect the more tangible business view of the industrial partner and a lot more substantive in describing the planned integration of the FI-WARE outcomes into the mainstream business of the industrial partners. ? Especially at the industrial partner level, leading to concrete plans for fit-for-deployment FI-WARE instances and other productization opportunities ? Engagement FI WARE outcomes with your corporate strategy ? Also welcomed is the emphasis given on "open model", "open solution", "open services", "open innovation", "open ecosystem" etc. How to start an ecosystem or leverage existing ones remains to be answered though. Equally, what does 'openness' mean beyond marketing, and concretely how it is to be applied in corporate strategy such as on the FI-WARE instances, need to be clarified. ? One good example in this respect is the very specific description provided in the Orange presentation in Seville, which clearly explains how usage of several sets of FI-WARE results is linked to its corporate strategy in engaging with the evolution of the services market. ? In which ecosystems are you going to focus or prioritize. Specifically, ecosystem formation needs to be prioritized strategically. In this respect, we continue to encourage the industrial partners to more actively and extensively engage senior business management to be involved in the exploitation and impact creation activity of the project. - Friday 10th May- I will consolidate all the outputs and feedback received - Monday 13th and Tuesday 14th - Final review and validation will take place - Wednesday 15th May - We will send the final deliverables Thanks for your collaboration Juan Juan Bare?o Group Innovation, Business Development & Strategy Research & Innovation +34 912148859 Calle Albarrac?n 25, 28037 Madrid juan.bareno at atos.net www.atos.net ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 339 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 4064 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: ATT437543.txt URL: From axel.fasse at sap.com Thu Apr 25 08:58:56 2013 From: axel.fasse at sap.com (Fasse, Axel) Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 06:58:56 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] Request to add a new PCC Menber in the Mailinglist Message-ID: Dear all, As you already know I have finalized the handover of my activities within the FI-WARE project to Markus Heller. Please add Markus Heller to the PCC Mailinglist. Best regards, Axel --------------------------- Axel Fasse Senior Researcher SAP Next Business and Technology SAP AG | Vincenz-Priessnitz-Str. 1 | 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany T +49 6227 7-52528 M +4915153858917 E axel.fasse at sap.com www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mcp at tid.es Thu Apr 25 10:18:25 2013 From: mcp at tid.es (Miguel Carrillo) Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 10:18:25 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] Request to add a new PCC Menber in the Mailinglist In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5178E6D1.6090407@tid.es> done El 25/04/2013 8:58, Fasse, Axel escribi?: Dear all, As you already know I have finalized the handover of my activities within the FI-WARE project to Markus Heller. Please add Markus Heller to the PCC Mailinglist. Best regards, Axel --------------------------- Axel Fasse Senior Researcher SAP Next Business and Technology SAP AG | Vincenz-Priessnitz-Str. 1 | 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany T +49 6227 7-52528 M +4915153858917 E axel.fasse at sap.com www.sap.com Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. _______________________________________________ Fiware-pcc mailing list Fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-pcc -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _/ _/_/ Miguel Carrillo Pacheco _/ _/ _/ _/ Telef?nica Distrito Telef?nica _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ Investigaci?n y Edifico Oeste 1, Planta 4 _/ _/ _/ _/ Desarrollo Ronda de la Comunicaci?n S/N _/ _/_/ 28050 Madrid (Spain) Tel: (+34) 91 483 26 77 e-mail: mcp at tid.es Follow FI-WARE on the net Website: http://www.fi-ware.eu Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 Twitter: http://twitter.com/Fiware LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From markus.heller at sap.com Thu Apr 25 12:35:11 2013 From: markus.heller at sap.com (Heller, Markus) Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 10:35:11 +0000 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] [Fiware-wpl] URGENT and CRITICAL vote by the FI-WARE General Assembly: SAP veto on amendment 4 In-Reply-To: <5175887A.5000700@tid.es> References: <5175887A.5000700@tid.es> Message-ID: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B06A2D4@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Dear all, We would like to add to Juanjo's remarks the following in order to clarify some misunderstanding that may have arisen: SAP's suggestion to delete the entire Section about Access Rights to Foreground and Background to FI PPP Partners does not contradict the 'spirit' of the FI PPP because the Access to Background is regulated in the Collaboration Agreement in the perfect differentiation for the specific needs of the technological FI PPP Platform Fi-Ware and the FI PPP Use Cases. The regulations in the Collaboration Agreement has finer regulations in order to fit the needs of the Use Cases and the special needs of Fi-Ware as Technology Platform. The regulations are as such: For Complementary Background, which is Background from another FI PPP Project, the Access is subject to another Agreement and upon discretion of the Background IP owner. Exception to this general rule is Background included in the so-called Fi-Ware Generic Enabler. This Background is accessible for FI PPP Partners upon royalty-free terms. Please see the exact wording of the Collaboration Agreement here: 4.2.3.4 Access Rights to Generic Enablers and Generic Enabler Specifications Notwithstanding the Sections 4.2.3.1 to 4.2.3.3 above, - Access Rights to Complementary Foreground and Complementary Background included in Generic Enabler Specifications for the execution of any Complementary Grant Agreement and for Use and - Access Rights to Complementary Background included in Generic Enablers which is Needed for the execution of the Complementary Grant Agreement are hereby requested in writing and are deemed granted on a royalty free basis to all Parties and by all Parties. We believe that this Section fits perfectly to the spirit of the FI PPP. Therefore, SAP believes, that we do not need any specific language in the DOW regarding the Access Rights. In parallel to the doodle polling according to the change procedures outlined in the mail below, we would like to share what is SAP's opinion on this matter. With best wishes, Markus Heller Dr. Markus Heller Senior Researcher SAP AG Vincenz-Priessnitz-Str. 1 76131 Karlsruhe / Germany T +49 6227 7-52673 Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: www.sap.com/corporate-en/impressum Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juanjo Hierro Sent: Montag, 22. April 2013 20:59 To: fiware-ga at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] URGENT and CRITICAL vote by the FI-WARE General Assembly: SAP veto on amendment 4 Dear FI-WARE partners, I have to inform you that SAP has decided to issue a veto on the current amendment 4 currently under negotiation with the EC until a question on IPR management is solved. We committed to handle this issue raised during development of amendment 5 of the DoW which was going to be opened right after the current amendment is closed and we rather expect to finalize before end of May simply because there were elements there we know the EC consider of a rather high priority: incorporation of the new governance model and inclusion of additional beneficiaries from the 2nd Open Call and, more relevant for the EC, the 3rd Open Call. However SAP didn't want to rely on this compromise based on experience of the time consumed in previous amendments and decided to go for this veto, exploiting their right to issue it. I honestly believe we shouldn't spend too much time discussing whether this was a fair approach or not. This mail is then to cast your vote on the solution to handle the issue raised by SAP to be incorporated in amendment 4. In this mail, I will elaborate on: 1. The issue itself 2. The alternative solutions proposed by SAP and Telefonica 3. The process we will follow to make a decision and communicate it to the EC 1. The issue itself The issue is derived from a contradiction that has been detected by SAP on different places of the Grant Agreement (the contract). On one hand, the B.3.2.4 section on IPR included in the FI-WARE DoW (formally referred as Annex I of the Grant Agreement) states the following: [cid:part1.08040204.00010208 at tid.es] This paragraph was based on what we already stated in our proposal and was also requested by the EC. It was also aligned with clauses related to access rights to FI-WARE GE specifications and implementations in the FI-PPP Collaboration Agreement. However, special clause 41 in article 7 of the Grant Agreement states the following which apparently contradicts what was said in section B.3.2.4 of the DoW: [cid:image002.png at 01CE41B0.967B36F0] (for your knowlege, complementary beneficiaries refer to beneficiaries of other other projects different than FI-WARE in the FI-PPP). Besides this, there is article of the Grant Agreement that elaborates on what interpretation should prevail in case of conflicts between different parts of the Grant Agreement: [cid:image003.png at 01CE41B0.967B36F0] That would mean that what was stated in special clause 41 in article 7 would take precedence over what was stated in section B.3.2.4 of the DoW. It seems like it would be worth fixing this contradictions in an amendment of the DoW. 2. The alternative solutions proposed by SAP and Telefonica 2.1 Solution proposed by SAP The solution proposed by SAP is simple: drop the conflicting paragraph on section B.3.2.4. Consequently, users of FI-WARE in the context of the FI-PPP could be charged for the background that is integrated as part of a FI-WARE GE implementation or will be required for its execution. 2.2. Solution proposed by Telefonica Telefonica strongly believe that it has been stated multiple times, as basic principle of the program, that users of FI-WARE in the context of FI-PPP activities cannot be charged for any background or foreground that becomes part of a FI-WARE GE implementation. It can also confirm that the European Commission has stated multiple times that this was a requirement for the program. Therefore, it will never be accepted by the EC. Our proposal is also simple: * Fix special clause 41 so that it reads as follows (changes marked in red): Complementary beneficiaries enjoy the rights and bear the obligations of beneficiaries with regard to Articles II.32, II.33 and II.34 of Annex II {Access Rights}. However, for complementary beneficiaries, these rights and obligations are limited to foreground and background associated only to FI-WARE GE implementations developed in FI-WARE the project. Therefore, they do not extend to background that is not part of FI-WARE GE implementations or required for them to run. Complementary beneficiaries are not members of the consortium for the purpose of this grant agreement * Clarify paragraph in section B.3.2.4 of the DoW for the avoidance of doubt: Access Rights to Foreground and Background associated to FI-WARE GE implementations needed for the execution of the FI-PPP projects and users who carry out experiments in the FI-WARE Open Innovation Lab as long as the FI-WARE project lasts, shall be deemed granted on a Royalty-Free basis. Other than in exceptional circumstances and only for Background specifically identified, no costs shall be charged for granting such Access Rights. The FI-WARE beneficiaries will not charge any such costs to the project. 3. The process we will follow to make a decision and communicate it to the EC Given the fact that the two positions on the matter are irreconcilable, we should go for a voting. In this respect, partners will be asked to: * vote yes, no or abstain to each of the proposals * clarify whether they would issue a veto to a proposal if it happens to be endorsed by the majority of the partners For this purpose, the following doodle will be used. http://www.doodle.com/8r4rt8wnur5a7wh7 Those who wish to keep their vote visible in doodle please send your vote to me (or in response to recipients of this mail). We will list their vote in the doodle as "partner X" (X being a number). Voting will close this Friday at 12:00. Please don't forget to cast your vote. We will circulate an spreadsheet with the gathered votes by email on Friday afternoon and will close the doodle. Just to avoid any issue, we will give a period until Monday 12:00 to raise an issue if you believe that your vote was not properly recorded. Once we gather all the votes, we will apply voting accounting rules as stated in the FI-WARE Consortium Agreement, meaning that each Party shall have a number of votes equal to the percentage that its Project Share bears to the total of all the Project Shares of the Parties. Then we will announce the results to the consortia. Finally, based on the results of the process described above: * We will communicate to the EC the proposed changes in the Grant Agreement and require them to be part of amendment 4 * We will inform the EC about the partners (if any) who plan to veto amendment 4 because of the proposed changes If you have any questions regarding any of the points above, don't hesitate to ask. Best regards, -- Juanjo Hierro ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 26719 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.png Type: image/png Size: 49073 bytes Desc: image002.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image003.png Type: image/png Size: 55743 bytes Desc: image003.png URL: From jhierro at tid.es Thu Apr 25 14:26:06 2013 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 14:26:06 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] [Fiware-wpl] URGENT and CRITICAL vote by the FI-WARE General Assembly: SAP veto on amendment 4 In-Reply-To: <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B06A2D4@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> References: <5175887A.5000700@tid.es> <393554EDCF801348BC53C7813C6CB73B06A2D4@DEWDFEMB14A.global.corp.sap> Message-ID: <517920DE.70704@tid.es> Dear all, Thanks for SAP about their remarks, but I'm afraid that SAP is missing an important point. SAP's summary about how the Collaboration Agreement treats background is correct. Precisely, Telefonica's proposal is trying to amend both clause 41 and the text in Annex I (DoW) of the Grant Agreement to precisely align the Grant Agreement with the Collaboration Agreement. On the other hand, the EC, as they have stated multiple times, is not a party in any Agreement, neither the Collaboration nor the Consortium Agreement. Therefore, they want to keep in the Grant Agreement clear statements about how IP Access Rights will be treated. That way, among other things, would keep them safe in the case that FI-PPP partners change their agreements on matters the EC don't agree to. That's why the paragraph that SAP now intends to suppress is there in our DoW. That's also the reason why we feel pretty sure that the EC will never agree to drop that paragraph. If we drop the paragraph in question from the DoW, as SAP suggests, then the EC would be accepting, contractually, that FI-WARE partners would have the right to charge for background associated to FI-WARE GEs. It cannot be argued that the Collaboration Agreement fixes that issue because the EC has always stated that the Collaboration Agreement doesn't bind the EC nor bind us with the EC. They wouldn't rely the treatment of Last but not least, the whole point is that the issue is being treated. We have asked SAP whether SAP would retire their veto on amendment 4 and limit issuance of any veto on how this IPR issue is solved. We are waiting for their response. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 25/04/13 12:35, Heller, Markus wrote: Dear all, We would like to add to Juanjo's remarks the following in order to clarify some misunderstanding that may have arisen: SAP's suggestion to delete the entire Section about Access Rights to Foreground and Background to FI PPP Partners does not contradict the 'spirit' of the FI PPP because the Access to Background is regulated in the Collaboration Agreement in the perfect differentiation for the specific needs of the technological FI PPP Platform Fi-Ware and the FI PPP Use Cases. The regulations in the Collaboration Agreement has finer regulations in order to fit the needs of the Use Cases and the special needs of Fi-Ware as Technology Platform. The regulations are as such: For Complementary Background, which is Background from another FI PPP Project, the Access is subject to another Agreement and upon discretion of the Background IP owner. Exception to this general rule is Background included in the so-called Fi-Ware Generic Enabler. This Background is accessible for FI PPP Partners upon royalty-free terms. Please see the exact wording of the Collaboration Agreement here: 4.2.3.4 Access Rights to Generic Enablers and Generic Enabler Specifications Notwithstanding the Sections 4.2.3.1 to 4.2.3.3 above, - Access Rights to Complementary Foreground and Complementary Background included in Generic Enabler Specifications for the execution of any Complementary Grant Agreement and for Use and - Access Rights to Complementary Background included in Generic Enablers which is Needed for the execution of the Complementary Grant Agreement are hereby requested in writing and are deemed granted on a royalty free basis to all Parties and by all Parties. We believe that this Section fits perfectly to the spirit of the FI PPP. Therefore, SAP believes, that we do not need any specific language in the DOW regarding the Access Rights. In parallel to the doodle polling according to the change procedures outlined in the mail below, we would like to share what is SAP's opinion on this matter. With best wishes, Markus Heller Dr. Markus Heller Senior Researcher SAP AG Vincenz-Priessnitz-Str. 1 76131 Karlsruhe / Germany T +49 6227 7-52673 Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: www.sap.com/corporate-en/impressum Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juanjo Hierro Sent: Montag, 22. April 2013 20:59 To: fiware-ga at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] URGENT and CRITICAL vote by the FI-WARE General Assembly: SAP veto on amendment 4 Dear FI-WARE partners, I have to inform you that SAP has decided to issue a veto on the current amendment 4 currently under negotiation with the EC until a question on IPR management is solved. We committed to handle this issue raised during development of amendment 5 of the DoW which was going to be opened right after the current amendment is closed and we rather expect to finalize before end of May simply because there were elements there we know the EC consider of a rather high priority: incorporation of the new governance model and inclusion of additional beneficiaries from the 2nd Open Call and, more relevant for the EC, the 3rd Open Call. However SAP didn't want to rely on this compromise based on experience of the time consumed in previous amendments and decided to go for this veto, exploiting their right to issue it. I honestly believe we shouldn't spend too much time discussing whether this was a fair approach or not. This mail is then to cast your vote on the solution to handle the issue raised by SAP to be incorporated in amendment 4. In this mail, I will elaborate on: 1. The issue itself 2. The alternative solutions proposed by SAP and Telefonica 3. The process we will follow to make a decision and communicate it to the EC 1. The issue itself The issue is derived from a contradiction that has been detected by SAP on different places of the Grant Agreement (the contract). On one hand, the B.3.2.4 section on IPR included in the FI-WARE DoW (formally referred as Annex I of the Grant Agreement) states the following: [cid:part1.08040204.00010208 at tid.es] This paragraph was based on what we already stated in our proposal and was also requested by the EC. It was also aligned with clauses related to access rights to FI-WARE GE specifications and implementations in the FI-PPP Collaboration Agreement. However, special clause 41 in article 7 of the Grant Agreement states the following which apparently contradicts what was said in section B.3.2.4 of the DoW: [cid:part3.03020403.00000100 at tid.es] (for your knowlege, complementary beneficiaries refer to beneficiaries of other other projects different than FI-WARE in the FI-PPP). Besides this, there is article of the Grant Agreement that elaborates on what interpretation should prevail in case of conflicts between different parts of the Grant Agreement: [cid:part4.05040302.05050409 at tid.es] That would mean that what was stated in special clause 41 in article 7 would take precedence over what was stated in section B.3.2.4 of the DoW. It seems like it would be worth fixing this contradictions in an amendment of the DoW. 2. The alternative solutions proposed by SAP and Telefonica 2.1 Solution proposed by SAP The solution proposed by SAP is simple: drop the conflicting paragraph on section B.3.2.4. Consequently, users of FI-WARE in the context of the FI-PPP could be charged for the background that is integrated as part of a FI-WARE GE implementation or will be required for its execution. 2.2. Solution proposed by Telefonica Telefonica strongly believe that it has been stated multiple times, as basic principle of the program, that users of FI-WARE in the context of FI-PPP activities cannot be charged for any background or foreground that becomes part of a FI-WARE GE implementation. It can also confirm that the European Commission has stated multiple times that this was a requirement for the program. Therefore, it will never be accepted by the EC. Our proposal is also simple: * Fix special clause 41 so that it reads as follows (changes marked in red): Complementary beneficiaries enjoy the rights and bear the obligations of beneficiaries with regard to Articles II.32, II.33 and II.34 of Annex II {Access Rights}. However, for complementary beneficiaries, these rights and obligations are limited to foreground and background associated only to FI-WARE GE implementations developed in FI-WARE the project. Therefore, they do not extend to background that is not part of FI-WARE GE implementations or required for them to run. Complementary beneficiaries are not members of the consortium for the purpose of this grant agreement * Clarify paragraph in section B.3.2.4 of the DoW for the avoidance of doubt: Access Rights to Foreground and Background associated to FI-WARE GE implementations needed for the execution of the FI-PPP projects and users who carry out experiments in the FI-WARE Open Innovation Lab as long as the FI-WARE project lasts, shall be deemed granted on a Royalty-Free basis. Other than in exceptional circumstances and only for Background specifically identified, no costs shall be charged for granting such Access Rights. The FI-WARE beneficiaries will not charge any such costs to the project. 3. The process we will follow to make a decision and communicate it to the EC Given the fact that the two positions on the matter are irreconcilable, we should go for a voting. In this respect, partners will be asked to: * vote yes, no or abstain to each of the proposals * clarify whether they would issue a veto to a proposal if it happens to be endorsed by the majority of the partners For this purpose, the following doodle will be used. http://www.doodle.com/8r4rt8wnur5a7wh7 Those who wish to keep their vote visible in doodle please send your vote to me (or in response to recipients of this mail). We will list their vote in the doodle as "partner X" (X being a number). Voting will close this Friday at 12:00. Please don't forget to cast your vote. We will circulate an spreadsheet with the gathered votes by email on Friday afternoon and will close the doodle. Just to avoid any issue, we will give a period until Monday 12:00 to raise an issue if you believe that your vote was not properly recorded. Once we gather all the votes, we will apply voting accounting rules as stated in the FI-WARE Consortium Agreement, meaning that each Party shall have a number of votes equal to the percentage that its Project Share bears to the total of all the Project Shares of the Parties. Then we will announce the results to the consortia. Finally, based on the results of the process described above: * We will communicate to the EC the proposed changes in the Grant Agreement and require them to be part of amendment 4 * We will inform the EC about the partners (if any) who plan to veto amendment 4 because of the proposed changes If you have any questions regarding any of the points above, don't hesitate to ask. Best regards, -- Juanjo Hierro ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/png Size: 26719 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/png Size: 49073 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/png Size: 55743 bytes Desc: not available URL: From stefano.depanfilis at eng.it Thu Apr 25 18:06:37 2013 From: stefano.depanfilis at eng.it (stefano de panfilis) Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 18:06:37 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] Fwd: [FI-PPP AB] Program-level Technical Schedule (GANTT) - Deadline 1s of May In-Reply-To: <1366837464.2484.19.camel@Hjalmar> References: <1366837464.2484.19.camel@Hjalmar> Message-ID: dear juanjo, according to the schedule from Thomas spreadsheet it appears that the launch of oil is now on 3-8 september and apparently in london. is that correct? when it was agreed? ciao, stefano ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Thomas Michael Bohnert Date: 2013/4/24 Subject: [FI-PPP AB] Program-level Technical Schedule (GANTT) - Deadline 1s of May To: "ab at fi-ppp.eu" , cimm Dear all, One AP on us (CONCORD) was to come up with a program-level technical schedule in order to identify potential conflicts / poor synchronisations early enough (Mind: lesson learned from Phase I). Action required by "all" Phase II projects: Fill all "technical" milestones / events / important dates into this excel sheet. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AkG-ybkpdM_kdHNJNEF4bFZLbGFfeHEzTEgwcmRjMEE#gid=0 Please do so by next Wed, 1st of May EOB (Bank for Bank holiday). Should be straightforward for experienced FP-veterans. In case of questions do not hesitate (am sure you wont, but please read the Help before - see tab on the bottom of the sheet). Cheers, Thomas -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Thu Apr 25 18:12:58 2013 From: nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu (Nuria De-Lama Sanchez) Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 18:12:58 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] URGENT and CRITICAL vote by the FI-WARE General Assembly: SAP veto on amendment 4 Message-ID: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A0200A56B@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> Dear all and thanks both Markus and Juanjo for the remarks, The position of Atos is simple: it was stated from the very beginning of the programme that access to background and foreground (that is needed for the purpose of executing the programme, which involves -of course-the FI-WARE GE and baseline works) would be given on a royalty-free basis. By the way, FI-WARE as project has publicity declared it in front of all audiences. In order to be coherent and explicit about it, it is good that this is clearly reflected in all the agreements, including the DoW, which in the end is the contract signed between FI-WARE partners and the EC (where we make clear our commitments). This is also a marketing tool. Be aware that as soon as other stakeholders feel (and see) they cannot get access to necessary background for free in the context of the FI PPP they will not be interested in our solutions anymore. Opening a door for charging them (or making them believe they they could be charged for the use of some background SW) may not be illegal (I am not sure), but would go not only against the spirit of the FI PPP, but also against business opportunities for FI-WARE. In the end, all partners are free to define the terms and conditions for their GE in a potential commercial context after the FI PPP, and this should be enough to be clear on the charging aspects in the future. As said, the present (execution of the FI PPP) is non-negotiable for our own benefit and interest. Best regards, Nuria de Lama Research & Innovation Representative to the European Commission T +34 91214 9321 F +34 91754 3252 nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atosresearch.eu es.atos.net From: fiware-ga-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-ga-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juanjo Hierro Sent: jueves, 25 de abril de 2013 14:26 To: Heller, Markus Cc: fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-ga at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-ga] [Fiware-wpl] URGENT and CRITICAL vote by the FI-WARE General Assembly: SAP veto on amendment 4 Dear all, Thanks for SAP about their remarks, but I'm afraid that SAP is missing an important point. SAP's summary about how the Collaboration Agreement treats background is correct. Precisely, Telefonica's proposal is trying to amend both clause 41 and the text in Annex I (DoW) of the Grant Agreement to precisely align the Grant Agreement with the Collaboration Agreement. On the other hand, the EC, as they have stated multiple times, is not a party in any Agreement, neither the Collaboration nor the Consortium Agreement. Therefore, they want to keep in the Grant Agreement clear statements about how IP Access Rights will be treated. That way, among other things, would keep them safe in the case that FI-PPP partners change their agreements on matters the EC don't agree to. That's why the paragraph that SAP now intends to suppress is there in our DoW. That's also the reason why we feel pretty sure that the EC will never agree to drop that paragraph. If we drop the paragraph in question from the DoW, as SAP suggests, then the EC would be accepting, contractually, that FI-WARE partners would have the right to charge for background associated to FI-WARE GEs. It cannot be argued that the Collaboration Agreement fixes that issue because the EC has always stated that the Collaboration Agreement doesn't bind the EC nor bind us with the EC. They wouldn't rely the treatment of Last but not least, the whole point is that the issue is being treated. We have asked SAP whether SAP would retire their veto on amendment 4 and limit issuance of any veto on how this IPR issue is solved. We are waiting for their response. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 25/04/13 12:35, Heller, Markus wrote: Dear all, We would like to add to Juanjo's remarks the following in order to clarify some misunderstanding that may have arisen: SAP's suggestion to delete the entire Section about Access Rights to Foreground and Background to FI PPP Partners does not contradict the 'spirit' of the FI PPP because the Access to Background is regulated in the Collaboration Agreement in the perfect differentiation for the specific needs of the technological FI PPP Platform Fi-Ware and the FI PPP Use Cases. The regulations in the Collaboration Agreement has finer regulations in order to fit the needs of the Use Cases and the special needs of Fi-Ware as Technology Platform. The regulations are as such: For Complementary Background, which is Background from another FI PPP Project, the Access is subject to another Agreement and upon discretion of the Background IP owner. Exception to this general rule is Background included in the so-called Fi-Ware Generic Enabler. This Background is accessible for FI PPP Partners upon royalty-free terms. Please see the exact wording of the Collaboration Agreement here: 4.2.3.4 Access Rights to Generic Enablers and Generic Enabler Specifications Notwithstanding the Sections 4.2.3.1 to 4.2.3.3 above, - Access Rights to Complementary Foreground and Complementary Background included in Generic Enabler Specifications for the execution of any Complementary Grant Agreement and for Use and - Access Rights to Complementary Background included in Generic Enablers which is Needed for the execution of the Complementary Grant Agreement are hereby requested in writing and are deemed granted on a royalty free basis to all Parties and by all Parties. We believe that this Section fits perfectly to the spirit of the FI PPP. Therefore, SAP believes, that we do not need any specific language in the DOW regarding the Access Rights. In parallel to the doodle polling according to the change procedures outlined in the mail below, we would like to share what is SAP's opinion on this matter. With best wishes, Markus Heller Dr. Markus Heller Senior Researcher SAP AG Vincenz-Priessnitz-Str. 1 76131 Karlsruhe / Germany T +49 6227 7-52673 Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements: www.sap.com/corporate-en/impressum Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Gesch?ftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine Vervielf?ltigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdr?cklich untersagt. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen Dank. This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juanjo Hierro Sent: Montag, 22. April 2013 20:59 To: fiware-ga at lists.fi-ware.eu Cc: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-wpl] URGENT and CRITICAL vote by the FI-WARE General Assembly: SAP veto on amendment 4 Dear FI-WARE partners, I have to inform you that SAP has decided to issue a veto on the current amendment 4 currently under negotiation with the EC until a question on IPR management is solved. We committed to handle this issue raised during development of amendment 5 of the DoW which was going to be opened right after the current amendment is closed and we rather expect to finalize before end of May simply because there were elements there we know the EC consider of a rather high priority: incorporation of the new governance model and inclusion of additional beneficiaries from the 2nd Open Call and, more relevant for the EC, the 3rd Open Call. However SAP didn't want to rely on this compromise based on experience of the time consumed in previous amendments and decided to go for this veto, exploiting their right to issue it. I honestly believe we shouldn't spend too much time discussing whether this was a fair approach or not. This mail is then to cast your vote on the solution to handle the issue raised by SAP to be incorporated in amendment 4. In this mail, I will elaborate on: 1. The issue itself 2. The alternative solutions proposed by SAP and Telefonica 3. The process we will follow to make a decision and communicate it to the EC 1. The issue itself The issue is derived from a contradiction that has been detected by SAP on different places of the Grant Agreement (the contract). On one hand, the B.3.2.4 section on IPR included in the FI-WARE DoW (formally referred as Annex I of the Grant Agreement) states the following: This paragraph was based on what we already stated in our proposal and was also requested by the EC. It was also aligned with clauses related to access rights to FI-WARE GE specifications and implementations in the FI-PPP Collaboration Agreement. However, special clause 41 in article 7 of the Grant Agreement states the following which apparently contradicts what was said in section B.3.2.4 of the DoW: (for your knowlege, complementary beneficiaries refer to beneficiaries of other other projects different than FI-WARE in the FI-PPP). Besides this, there is article of the Grant Agreement that elaborates on what interpretation should prevail in case of conflicts between different parts of the Grant Agreement: That would mean that what was stated in special clause 41 in article 7 would take precedence over what was stated in section B.3.2.4 of the DoW. It seems like it would be worth fixing this contradictions in an amendment of the DoW. 2. The alternative solutions proposed by SAP and Telefonica 2.1 Solution proposed by SAP The solution proposed by SAP is simple: drop the conflicting paragraph on section B.3.2.4. Consequently, users of FI-WARE in the context of the FI-PPP could be charged for the background that is integrated as part of a FI-WARE GE implementation or will be required for its execution. 2.2. Solution proposed by Telefonica Telefonica strongly believe that it has been stated multiple times, as basic principle of the program, that users of FI-WARE in the context of FI-PPP activities cannot be charged for any background or foreground that becomes part of a FI-WARE GE implementation. It can also confirm that the European Commission has stated multiple times that this was a requirement for the program. Therefore, it will never be accepted by the EC. Our proposal is also simple: * Fix special clause 41 so that it reads as follows (changes marked in red): Complementary beneficiaries enjoy the rights and bear the obligations of beneficiaries with regard to Articles II.32, II.33 and II.34 of Annex II {Access Rights}. However, for complementary beneficiaries, these rights and obligations are limited to foreground and background associated only to FI-WARE GE implementations developed in FI-WARE the project. Therefore, they do not extend to background that is not part of FI-WARE GE implementations or required for them to run. Complementary beneficiaries are not members of the consortium for the purpose of this grant agreement * Clarify paragraph in section B.3.2.4 of the DoW for the avoidance of doubt: Access Rights to Foreground and Background associated to FI-WARE GE implementations needed for the execution of the FI-PPP projects and users who carry out experiments in the FI-WARE Open Innovation Lab as long as the FI-WARE project lasts, shall be deemed granted on a Royalty-Free basis. Other than in exceptional circumstances and only for Background specifically identified, no costs shall be charged for granting such Access Rights. The FI-WARE beneficiaries will not charge any such costs to the project. 3. The process we will follow to make a decision and communicate it to the EC Given the fact that the two positions on the matter are irreconcilable, we should go for a voting. In this respect, partners will be asked to: * vote yes, no or abstain to each of the proposals * clarify whether they would issue a veto to a proposal if it happens to be endorsed by the majority of the partners For this purpose, the following doodle will be used. http://www.doodle.com/8r4rt8wnur5a7wh7 Those who wish to keep their vote visible in doodle please send your vote to me (or in response to recipients of this mail). We will list their vote in the doodle as "partner X" (X being a number). Voting will close this Friday at 12:00. Please don't forget to cast your vote. We will circulate an spreadsheet with the gathered votes by email on Friday afternoon and will close the doodle. Just to avoid any issue, we will give a period until Monday 12:00 to raise an issue if you believe that your vote was not properly recorded. Once we gather all the votes, we will apply voting accounting rules as stated in the FI-WARE Consortium Agreement, meaning that each Party shall have a number of votes equal to the percentage that its Project Share bears to the total of all the Project Shares of the Parties. Then we will announce the results to the consortia. Finally, based on the results of the process described above: * We will communicate to the EC the proposed changes in the Grant Agreement and require them to be part of amendment 4 * We will inform the EC about the partners (if any) who plan to veto amendment 4 because of the proposed changes If you have any questions regarding any of the points above, don't hesitate to ask. Best regards, -- Juanjo Hierro ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 78 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 816 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image003.png Type: image/png Size: 26719 bytes Desc: image003.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image004.png Type: image/png Size: 49073 bytes Desc: image004.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image005.png Type: image/png Size: 55743 bytes Desc: image005.png URL: From jhierro at tid.es Thu Apr 25 19:06:18 2013 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 19:06:18 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] Fwd: [FI-PPP AB] Program-level Technical Schedule (GANTT) - Deadline 1s of May In-Reply-To: References: <1366837464.2484.19.camel@Hjalmar> Message-ID: <5179628A.2060408@tid.es> The FI-WARE OIL has to be ready by end of July as always planned. It's availability has to be announced to UC projects at that date. Nothing changes in that respect. A different thing is what is the large event where the FI-WARE OIL would be announced and promoted to the general public, let's say. That would be in the Campus Party in September 3-8 and we announced this as a possibility in the Architects Week. That's what someone from CONCORD seems to have annotated. I was about to send an email on the matter about announcement of the FI-WARE OIL in the Campus Party but your message arrived in parallel while I was preparing it. Please wait until that mail arrives and the we can follow-up the discussion. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 25/04/13 18:06, stefano de panfilis wrote: dear juanjo, according to the schedule from Thomas spreadsheet it appears that the launch of oil is now on 3-8 september and apparently in london. is that correct? when it was agreed? ciao, stefano ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Thomas Michael Bohnert > Date: 2013/4/24 Subject: [FI-PPP AB] Program-level Technical Schedule (GANTT) - Deadline 1s of May To: "ab at fi-ppp.eu" >, cimm > Dear all, One AP on us (CONCORD) was to come up with a program-level technical schedule in order to identify potential conflicts / poor synchronisations early enough (Mind: lesson learned from Phase I). Action required by "all" Phase II projects: Fill all "technical" milestones / events / important dates into this excel sheet. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AkG-ybkpdM_kdHNJNEF4bFZLbGFfeHEzTEgwcmRjMEE#gid=0 Please do so by next Wed, 1st of May EOB (Bank for Bank holiday). Should be straightforward for experienced FP-veterans. In case of questions do not hesitate (am sure you wont, but please read the Help before - see tab on the bottom of the sheet). Cheers, Thomas -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Thu Apr 25 19:26:02 2013 From: nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu (Nuria De-Lama Sanchez) Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 19:26:02 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] Program-level Technical Schedule (GANTT) - Deadline 1s of May (OIL and info provided to the FI PPP DWG) Message-ID: <66E3B1FDDB04BE4D92DC3A2BA8D98D9A0200A5AC@INTMAIL03.es.int.atosorigin.com> RE: OIL & FI PPP DWG For your information, and with respect to this big event to launch the OIL, I have already informed (with limited information though) the Dissemination WG of the FI PPP. I provided some details on the winning consortium from the last Open Call and the kind of activities that are envisaged based on that contract (even if this has to be confirmed, since everything has been closed very recently). I opposed to many events organized by the PPP, like the so called Future Internet Week in Berlin (some of you may have heard about it) and instead of that -after talking to Juanjo- I proposed the possibility of creating synergies with the Campus Party event in London (to be held in the beginning of September) I would like Juanjo, once you have had the necessary meetings with those partners, to establish a link between their activities and those of related WPs (as it could be the case for WP11 but for sure for WP12, where I am now putting more efforts). In that respect, the DWG of the FI PPP is asking me to provide: ? More detailed information on the event in September and the opportunities to extend that to other projects (ex. Would Use Cases be able to promote their Open Calls there?, what will be the constituency?) ? More detailed information on other events FI-WARE plans to organize (if they are considered suitable for the FI PPP cooperation) ? ... Basically they need (1) to be sure that the interest is not only for FI-WARE, but that it is also relevant for the other projects if resources from them are assigned to this and (2) to plan in advance the activities for their project As said, I declared it was too early and it is still under analysis, but the better we get some info, the better (I suppose Juanjo will start providing such details for all of us). I wanted to share this info for everyone in the PCC to be aware of the communication in the overall FI PPP context. Nuria de Lama Research & Innovation Representative to the European Commission T +34 91214 9321 F +34 91754 3252 nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu Albarrac?n 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atosresearch.eu es.atos.net From: fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juanjo Hierro Sent: jueves, 25 de abril de 2013 19:06 To: stefano de panfilis Cc: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: Re: [Fiware-pcc] Fwd: [FI-PPP AB] Program-level Technical Schedule (GANTT) - Deadline 1s of May The FI-WARE OIL has to be ready by end of July as always planned. It's availability has to be announced to UC projects at that date. Nothing changes in that respect. A different thing is what is the large event where the FI-WARE OIL would be announced and promoted to the general public, let's say. That would be in the Campus Party in September 3-8 and we announced this as a possibility in the Architects Week. That's what someone from CONCORD seems to have annotated. I was about to send an email on the matter about announcement of the FI-WARE OIL in the Campus Party but your message arrived in parallel while I was preparing it. Please wait until that mail arrives and the we can follow-up the discussion. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 25/04/13 18:06, stefano de panfilis wrote: dear juanjo, according to the schedule from Thomas spreadsheet it appears that the launch of oil is now on 3-8 september and apparently in london. is that correct? when it was agreed? ciao, stefano ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Thomas Michael Bohnert Date: 2013/4/24 Subject: [FI-PPP AB] Program-level Technical Schedule (GANTT) - Deadline 1s of May To: "ab at fi-ppp.eu" , cimm Dear all, One AP on us (CONCORD) was to come up with a program-level technical schedule in order to identify potential conflicts / poor synchronisations early enough (Mind: lesson learned from Phase I). Action required by "all" Phase II projects: Fill all "technical" milestones / events / important dates into this excel sheet. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AkG-ybkpdM_kdHNJNEF4bFZLbGFfeHEzTEgwcmRjMEE#gid=0 Please do so by next Wed, 1st of May EOB (Bank for Bank holiday). Should be straightforward for experienced FP-veterans. In case of questions do not hesitate (am sure you wont, but please read the Help before - see tab on the bottom of the sheet). Cheers, Thomas -- Stefano De Panfilis Chief Innovation Officer Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A. via Riccardo Morandi 32 00148 Roma Italy tel (direct): +39-068307-4295 tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513 fax: +39-068307-4200 cell: +39-335-7542-567 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 78 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 816 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: From jhierro at tid.es Thu Apr 25 19:44:20 2013 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 19:44:20 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] Incorporation of beneficiaries of the FI-WARE 3rd Open Call In-Reply-To: <516E74E7.90305@tid.es> References: <516E74E7.90305@tid.es> Message-ID: <51796B74.9070307@tid.es> Dear members of the FI-WARE PCC, Given the fact that no FI-WARE partner objected, we have just communicated to the EC that the beneficiaries of the 3rd FI-WARE Open Call have been selected and negotiation with them has started. You can download the proposal that won the 3rd Open Call from here: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/view.php/27/2130/130227+FIWARE.3rdcall.EDE.V.DEF.pdf Attached, for your convenience, you have the Evaluation Summary Report (Consensus Evaluation Form). We have to say that we feel that the proposal is rather strong and brings a rather ambitious plan. One of its very first big milestones would be the official launch of the FI-WARE OIL in the Campus Party London that will take place in London, from September 3 until 8. This is a huge event, with large media coverage. FI-WARE will become highly visible in that event, with a series of specific FI-WARE actions within the event such as workshops, hackatons, slots for keynote speeches and announcements on main stage, etc. You can take a look and learn some about the Campus Party at http://www.campus-party.org/home-en.html. I found a rather complete and interesting video from the BBC there that gives a good vision of how the event looks like. Searching for images about the Campus Party in Google may also help you to get a feeling. Announcement of the FI-WARE OIL in the Campus Party London will subsequently be followed by aprox. 50 startup weekend events across the whole Europe where FI-WARE will be advertized. All this accompanied by an ambitious marketing campaign driven by the world-wide recognized Ogilvy company. The EC is very excited and happy about these results of the 3rd FI-WARE Open Call. Most probably, Mrs Neelie Kroes, who attended the last Campus Party in Berlin and liked it a lot, will attend the Campus Party London. We will work to achieve that she does not only attend the event but becomes who makes the public announcement of the FI-WARE OIL. The several developer contests (up to 700KEUR in awards) will also be announced there. One of the proposals that we would like to make to the whole FI-WARE consortia is that we organize a General Assembly meeting of FI-WARE that same week in the Campus Party. We may find rooms to run internal meetings while at the same time take the opportunity that we are there to run live training sessions on specific GEis targeted to developers on a dedicated stage we would have, attend/assists hackatons, attend the plenary events, chat with developers, etc. My proposal would be also that we order a set of t-shirts prior to the event, so that FI-WARE team members attending can wear them and thus maximize visibility of FI-WARE. Prior to making this proposal to the whole consortia, of course, I would like to hear your opinions. I hope you agree this is a great opportunity. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Announcement (confidential) of new FI-WARE benificiaries as a result of the third FI-WARE Open Call Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 12:09:43 +0200 From: Juanjo Hierro To: fiware-ga at lists.fi-ware.eu CC: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu , fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu , fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu Dear partners, First of all, let me point out that contents of this email should be handled confidentially. As many of you know, FI-WARE launched the 3rd Open Call targeted to design and implement an ambitious plan for the promotion and dissemination of FI-WARE (see http://www.fi-ware.eu/open-call/) I'm glad to say that the evaluation of proposals has finalized with the selection of a proposal submitted by a rather strong consortia formed by Futura Networks and Asociaci?n E3 Futura (organizers of the huge Campus Party event), Startup Weekend (who have developed a huge network of startups events around the world), OgilvyOne (one of the major Publicity and Marketing companies in the World and Europe), NLnet (who helped introduce internet in Europe and holds a high quality network of involved innovators and active developers) and the Chambers of Spain offering their to SME networks in Latin America and the EU. Please find attached the corresponding Evaluation Summary Report. Following open call procedures, the evaluation has been carried out by independent evaluators. Also following Open Call procedures, we have now to ask you if you have any objection to the incorporation of any of the mentioned companies/organizations as new beneficiaries in FI-WARE. Note that we are not asking your opinion about the result of the evaluation itself. That has been carried out by the independent evaluators. We are just asking you whether you have any objection regarding any of the selected beneficiaries. Deadline for raising objections is this Friday EOB. If you are interested in getting a private copy of the proposal, please let me know. We will distribute it to the whole consortia as soon as we officially communicate the final result and call the selected beneficiaries for negotiations (next Monday). In the meantime, we want to have distribution of the proposal under control. Best regards, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Consensus Evaluation Form - EDE_final.xlsx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet Size: 14018 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jhierro at tid.es Mon Apr 29 09:39:50 2013 From: jhierro at tid.es (Juanjo Hierro) Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 09:39:50 +0200 Subject: [Fiware-pcc] [Fiware-wpl] URGENT and CRITICAL vote by the FI-WARE General Assembly: SAP veto on amendment 4 In-Reply-To: <5175887A.5000700@tid.es> References: <5175887A.5000700@tid.es> Message-ID: <517E23C6.6060809@tid.es> Dear FI-WARE partners, You can find below the capture of the doodle vote regarding the raised issue on management of IPRs linked to background FI-WARE GEs rely on. Please double-check that your vote was properly captured. There was an additional vote by one partner who wanted to remain anonymus on doodle (therefore, it was referred as Partner 1). We have finally dropped the doodle poll as planned. Thanks to all of you who have voted. Fortunately, SAP has communicated to us that they withdraw their veto on amendment 4, as far as the issue is addressed in the next amendment (amendment 5). I believe that all of us share the need for solving the issue, so let's go for that and work together in the best proposal. I would like to give thanks to SAP for withdrawing their veto. Cheers, -- Juanjo Hierro [cid:part1.05030105.00030308 at tid.es] ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 On 22/04/13 20:59, Juanjo Hierro wrote: Dear FI-WARE partners, I have to inform you that SAP has decided to issue a veto on the current amendment 4 currently under negotiation with the EC until a question on IPR management is solved. We committed to handle this issue raised during development of amendment 5 of the DoW which was going to be opened right after the current amendment is closed and we rather expect to finalize before end of May simply because there were elements there we know the EC consider of a rather high priority: incorporation of the new governance model and inclusion of additional beneficiaries from the 2nd Open Call and, more relevant for the EC, the 3rd Open Call. However SAP didn't want to rely on this compromise based on experience of the time consumed in previous amendments and decided to go for this veto, exploiting their right to issue it. I honestly believe we shouldn't spend too much time discussing whether this was a fair approach or not. This mail is then to cast your vote on the solution to handle the issue raised by SAP to be incorporated in amendment 4. In this mail, I will elaborate on: 1. The issue itself 2. The alternative solutions proposed by SAP and Telefonica 3. The process we will follow to make a decision and communicate it to the EC 1. The issue itself The issue is derived from a contradiction that has been detected by SAP on different places of the Grant Agreement (the contract). On one hand, the B.3.2.4 section on IPR included in the FI-WARE DoW (formally referred as Annex I of the Grant Agreement) states the following: [cid:part1.08040204.00010208 at tid.es] This paragraph was based on what we already stated in our proposal and was also requested by the EC. It was also aligned with clauses related to access rights to FI-WARE GE specifications and implementations in the FI-PPP Collaboration Agreement. However, special clause 41 in article 7 of the Grant Agreement states the following which apparently contradicts what was said in section B.3.2.4 of the DoW: [cid:part3.00020808.09050901 at tid.es] (for your knowlege, complementary beneficiaries refer to beneficiaries of other other projects different than FI-WARE in the FI-PPP). Besides this, there is article of the Grant Agreement that elaborates on what interpretation should prevail in case of conflicts between different parts of the Grant Agreement: [cid:part4.01060106.00000402 at tid.es] That would mean that what was stated in special clause 41 in article 7 would take precedence over what was stated in section B.3.2.4 of the DoW. It seems like it would be worth fixing this contradictions in an amendment of the DoW. 2. The alternative solutions proposed by SAP and Telefonica 2.1 Solution proposed by SAP The solution proposed by SAP is simple: drop the conflicting paragraph on section B.3.2.4. Consequently, users of FI-WARE in the context of the FI-PPP could be charged for the background that is integrated as part of a FI-WARE GE implementation or will be required for its execution. 2.2. Solution proposed by Telefonica Telefonica strongly believe that it has been stated multiple times, as basic principle of the program, that users of FI-WARE in the context of FI-PPP activities cannot be charged for any background or foreground that becomes part of a FI-WARE GE implementation. It can also confirm that the European Commission has stated multiple times that this was a requirement for the program. Therefore, it will never be accepted by the EC. Our proposal is also simple: * Fix special clause 41 so that it reads as follows (changes marked in red): Complementary beneficiaries enjoy the rights and bear the obligations of beneficiaries with regard to Articles II.32, II.33 and II.34 of Annex II {Access Rights}. However, for complementary beneficiaries, these rights and obligations are limited to foreground and background associated only to FI-WARE GE implementations developed in FI-WARE the project. Therefore, they do not extend to background that is not part of FI-WARE GE implementations or required for them to run. Complementary beneficiaries are not members of the consortium for the purpose of this grant agreement * Clarify paragraph in section B.3.2.4 of the DoW for the avoidance of doubt: Access Rights to Foreground and Background associated to FI-WARE GE implementations needed for the execution of the FI-PPP projects and users who carry out experiments in the FI-WARE Open Innovation Lab as long as the FI-WARE project lasts, shall be deemed granted on a Royalty-Free basis. Other than in exceptional circumstances and only for Background specifically identified, no costs shall be charged for granting such Access Rights. The FI-WARE beneficiaries will not charge any such costs to the project. 3. The process we will follow to make a decision and communicate it to the EC Given the fact that the two positions on the matter are irreconcilable, we should go for a voting. In this respect, partners will be asked to: * vote yes, no or abstain to each of the proposals * clarify whether they would issue a veto to a proposal if it happens to be endorsed by the majority of the partners For this purpose, the following doodle will be used. http://www.doodle.com/8r4rt8wnur5a7wh7 Those who wish to keep their vote visible in doodle please send your vote to me (or in response to recipients of this mail). We will list their vote in the doodle as "partner X" (X being a number). Voting will close this Friday at 12:00. Please don't forget to cast your vote. We will circulate an spreadsheet with the gathered votes by email on Friday afternoon and will close the doodle. Just to avoid any issue, we will give a period until Monday 12:00 to raise an issue if you believe that your vote was not properly recorded. Once we gather all the votes, we will apply voting accounting rules as stated in the FI-WARE Consortium Agreement, meaning that each Party shall have a number of votes equal to the percentage that its Project Share bears to the total of all the Project Shares of the Parties. Then we will announce the results to the consortia. Finally, based on the results of the process described above: * We will communicate to the EC the proposed changes in the Grant Agreement and require them to be part of amendment 4 * We will inform the EC about the partners (if any) who plan to veto amendment 4 because of the proposed changes If you have any questions regarding any of the points above, don't hesitate to ask. Best regards, -- Juanjo Hierro ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator and Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ Fiware-wpl mailing list Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el enlace situado m?s abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: jigiedfg.png Type: image/png Size: 70535 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/png Size: 26719 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/png Size: 49073 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/png Size: 55743 bytes Desc: not available URL: