Thank you Juanjo for the summary. A comment for our Thales colleagues. Do not forget that the Industry Board was proposed by Thales in the Task Force on the FI PPP Governance structure that was created in July after the first meeting with the EC. Thales was great supporter together with many other companies. However, I may agree with the fact that the description is not good or does not make sense as it is now. Still, we should be careful in the way we formulate our concerns so that it does not seem that we -ourselves- enter in contradiction with previous proposals. My two cents. Nuria de Lama Research & Innovation Representative to the European Commission T +34 91214 9321 F +34 91754 3252 nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu <mailto:nuria.delama at atosresearch.eu> Albarracín 25 28037 Madrid Spain www.atosresearch.eu es.atos.net From: fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juanjo Hierro Sent: miércoles, 27 de febrero de 2013 12:38 To: fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu Subject: [Fiware-pcc] Minutes and very final URGENT checks prior sending email to the EC (specially for SAP, THALES and IBM) Hi all, Please take a look at the minutes which I have finalized in the shared Google doc. Telefonica will prepare an email to be sent to the EC where we will explain that there is general consensus among the partners about the incorporation of comments 1-6 discussed in the call (as per agreement captured in these minutes) but there is still disagreement on the following points: * Mandate of Project Coordinators at the SB: we will explain which was the paragraph where the conflict is located and we will explain we are working in alternative text * Prevalence of the DoW over the Collaboration Agreement and Consortium Agreement: Here, SAP and IBM object using the DoW as mechanism for fast-tracking changes in the governance model. We will ask the EC about clarification on their position about prevalence of the DoW, Consortium Agreement and Collaboration Agreement. * Inclusion of the EIB. Here, Thales and SAP seem to disagree with their inclusion. IBM will double-check whether they can live with that part. I would kindly ask Thales, SAP and IBM to explicitly confirm, in response to this mail whether it is right that they object to the inclusion of the EIB and/or the wording associated to that inclusion. This part was discussed while SAP was not at the meeting so I want to make a final double-check. IBM took the AP to come to us with a response. Cheers, -- Juanjo ------------- Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital website: www.tid.es email: jhierro at tid.es twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect You can follow FI-WARE at: website: http://www.fi-ware.eu facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 twitter: http://twitter.com/FIware linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace situado más abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningun compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes. Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquiera danos que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus. ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-pcc/attachments/20130227/d491682b/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 78 bytes Desc: image001.gif URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-pcc/attachments/20130227/d491682b/attachment.gif> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.gif Type: image/gif Size: 816 bytes Desc: image002.gif URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-pcc/attachments/20130227/d491682b/attachment-0001.gif>
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy