[Fiware-pcc] Minutes and very final URGENT checks prior sending email to the EC (specially for SAP, THALES and IBM)

[Yaron Wolfsthal]

On the EIB (thanks, Juanjo, for summarizing this as follows) -

=======
  Here there are two points about which you have to make a position so 
that I can summarize it in the email to be sent to the EC this 
afternoon/evening:
Whether you agree with creation of this EIB or not, with the role 
described in the latest governance model draft
Whether you agree that an approach to introduce this new body in the 
governance model is by means of incorporating the text describing the 
governance model in the DoWs.   I undertand that the EC believes this is a 
proper procedure because then it may be argued that the DoW prevails over 
the Consortium and Collaboration Agreements.   However, some partners 
(IBM, SAP) have mentioned that they don't agree this is a valid approach.  
You should make it clear whether you agree this is valid or not.
========

IBM prefers to continue the discussion on the first point (as we saw, 
there are several concerns by some partners) prior to deciding.
IBM does not accept the second point (IBM does not view incorporating text 
describing EIB in DoW is as a valid approach).

Thanks
Yaron



From:   Juanjo Hierro <jhierro at tid.es>
To:     "fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu" <fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu>, 
Date:   27/02/2013 01:38 PM
Subject:        [Fiware-pcc] Minutes and very final URGENT checks prior 
sending email to the EC (specially for SAP, THALES and IBM)
Sent by:        fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu



Hi all,

  Please take a look at the minutes which I have finalized in the shared 
Google doc.

  Telefonica will prepare an email to be sent to the EC where we will 
explain that there is general consensus among the partners about the 
incorporation of comments 1-6 discussed in the call (as per agreement 
captured in these minutes) but there is still disagreement on the 
following points:
Mandate of Project Coordinators at the SB: we will explain which was the 
paragraph where the conflict is located and we will explain we are working 
in alternative text 
Prevalence of the DoW over the Collaboration Agreement and Consortium 
Agreement:   Here, SAP and IBM object using the DoW as mechanism for 
fast-tracking changes in the governance model.  We will ask the EC about 
clarification on their position about prevalence of the DoW, Consortium 
Agreement and Collaboration Agreement. 
Inclusion of the EIB.   Here, Thales and SAP seem to disagree with their 
inclusion.   IBM will double-check whether they can live with that part. 

  I would kindly ask Thales, SAP and IBM to explicitly confirm, in 
response to this mail whether it is right that they object to the 
inclusion of the EIB and/or the wording associated to that inclusion. This 
part was discussed while SAP was not at the meeting so I want to make a 
final double-check.   IBM took the AP to come to us with a response.
  Cheers,
-- Juanjo

-------------
Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital
website: www.tid.es
email: jhierro at tid.es
twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro

FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect

You can follow FI-WARE at:
  website:  http://www.fi-ware.eu
  facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242
  twitter:  http://twitter.com/FIware
  linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932



Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar 
nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace 
situado más abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and 
receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
_______________________________________________
Fiware-pcc mailing list
Fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu
http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-pcc

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-pcc/attachments/20130227/24ee023a/attachment.html>