[Fiware-pcc] Fw: New proposed governance structure

[Juanjo Hierro]

Dear Yaron,

  Please refer to the very last draft text circulated this morning by Jose Jimenez.

  Nevertheless, for your knowledge, any reference to IPRs has been dropped from the final text proposed by the EC.   It seems like they have taken this comment, which we had anticipated to them, already into account.

  Cheers,

-- Juanjo

-------------
Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital
website: www.tid.es<http://www.tid.es>
email: jhierro at tid.es<mailto:jhierro at tid.es>
twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro

FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect

You can follow FI-WARE at:
  website:  http://www.fi-ware.eu
  facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242
  twitter:  http://twitter.com/FIware
  linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932


On 31/01/13 10:23, Yaron Wolfsthal wrote:
Juanjo, all
IBM strongly agrees that "the point that refers to changes regarding IPRs should be dropped because don't have anything to do with the governance model".

Regards
Yaron
----- Forwarded by Yaron Wolfsthal/Haifa/IBM on 31/01/2013 11:20 AM -----
From:        Juanjo Hierro <jhierro at tid.es><mailto:jhierro at tid.es>
To:        stefano de panfilis <stefano.depanfilis at eng.it><mailto:stefano.depanfilis at eng.it>,
Cc:        "fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu"<mailto:fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu> <fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu><mailto:fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu>
Date:        30/01/2013 10:00 AM
Subject:        Re: [Fiware-pcc] New proposed governance structure
Sent by:        fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu<mailto:fiware-pcc-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu>
________________________________



Hi all,

 So far, I have identified the following changes based on your input and following discussions:

  *   Drop the role of the Technical Advisor
  *   Copy the following text in the description of the Steering Board:
     *   The SB and the AB provide strong recommendations to projects according to a  defined decision process.  Projects coordinators have a mandate from their consortium to discuss and agree on recommendations of the SB and AB.
  *   Make sure that the text explains that the AB is formed by two technical representatives per project and nothing else is stated anywhere in the document
  *   Make it more explicit that the SB take decisions also based on consensus
  *   Drop any reference to limits in the number of members of the SB to avoid inconsistencies

  Any other changes ?   If no comment is raised, we will assume that introducing the above changes is generally agreed.

  There is an additional one I would like to propose.   There is a final section on "Expected changes to the Collaboration Agreement".   I believe that this section should only refer to changes required to accomodate to this new governance model.   Therefore, the point that refers to changes regarding IPRs should be dropped because don't have anything to do with the governance model.   The rest are consistent and describe changes that would actually be required to align the Collaboration Agreement with the new proposed governance structure.


 Your feedback is welcome.

  Best regards,

-- Juanjo

-------------
Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital
website: www.tid.es<http://www.tid.es/>
email: jhierro at tid.es<mailto:jhierro at tid.es>
twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro

FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect

You can follow FI-WARE at:
 website:  http://www.fi-ware.eu<http://www.fi-ware.eu/>
 facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242
 twitter:  http://twitter.com/FIware
 linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932




________________________________

Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace situado más abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx_______________________________________________
Fiware-pcc mailing list
Fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu<mailto:Fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu>
http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-pcc



________________________________

Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace situado más abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-pcc/attachments/20130131/e136ade7/attachment.html>