[Fiware-pcc] Fwd: FI-WARE: assessment of prototypes

[Juanjo Hierro]

Hi all,

  Our PO would like to perform a better assessment of the software associated to GEi by means of involving a reputed expert with higher technical skills than the current team of reviewers.

  For this reason, he has proposed Lutz Schubert whose CV is attached.

  Unles we hear of any justified objections to his proposal before Wednesday noon, we will return an ok to our PO.

  Thanks and best regards,

-- Juanjo


-------------
Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital
website: www.tid.es<http://www.tid.es>
email: jhierro at tid.es<mailto:jhierro at tid.es>
twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro

FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator
and Chief Architect

FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman

You can follow FI-WARE at:
  website:  http://www.fi-ware.eu
  facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242
  twitter:  http://twitter.com/FIware
  linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932



-------- Original Message --------
Subject:        FI-WARE: assessment of prototypes
Date:   Mon, 8 Jul 2013 17:47:06 +0000
From:   <Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu><mailto:Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu>
To:     <subsidies at tid.es><mailto:subsidies at tid.es>, <jdps at tid.es><mailto:jdps at tid.es>, <subsidies at tid.es><mailto:subsidies at tid.es>, <jhierro at tid.es><mailto:jhierro at tid.es>
CC:     <stefano.depanfilis at eng.it><mailto:stefano.depanfilis at eng.it>


Dear all,

During FI-WARE reviews, the assessment of the prototypes is mostly based on the demos. I would like to have a better assessment of the prototypes, independent from the normal FI-WARE reviews. Therefore, I have asked Lutz Schubert from the University of Ulm (formerly with HLRS Stuttgart) if he would be willing to carry out such a task, and he kindly accepted. His assessment will take during the summer period, and will result in a report. The report will be shared with the consortium and the reviewers, but will not be formally part of the M24 or later reviews. Lutz will get a standard EC review contract, and therefore his participation as a reviewer needs to be approved by the consortium.

Therefore,

-          Could you please give your approval for having Lutz as a reviewer (CV attached)? This is a necessary formal step.

-          Since I cannot imagine any valid reason for not having Lutz as a reviewer (commercial confidentiality being the only valid reason and that does not apply), can you please give him access to all software prototypes? I have access to public and confidential software, but the 'normal' reviewers do not. Lutz needs to have that too, obviously. Perhaps it is more practical to give him access to the testbed / OIL? What can be done here?

Best regards,
Arian.



________________________________

Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace situado más abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-pcc/attachments/20130709/43e4d4c2/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Schubert.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 25753 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-pcc/attachments/20130709/43e4d4c2/attachment.pdf>