[Fiware-qualityassurance] Feedback from PC about labeling

[Muryshkin, Peter]

Hi, Clara and all,


thank you very much for these updates. I am totally OK if we have the average, or median: in the current data, only two components are A++ so far.

In terms of a standard, in long term in my opinion we should consider whether to follow the rules of the energy labels or not for this logic.


The DevOps automation solution will become tangible rather in FI-NEXT. On short term, the most simple way to inject static label values to the Catalogue ASAP is possible via the free cloud 3rd party service API shields.io where you get a label just by an URL API call.


e.g. this call instructs the API to build a green A++:
https://img.shields.io/badge/QA-A%2B%2B-green.svg


delivers an SVG object:

[cid:cf45a3f1-3b1e-43db-931f-861d7340fc2d]​


kind regards

Peter


________________________________
Von: fiware-qualityassurance-bounces at lists.fiware.org <fiware-qualityassurance-bounces at lists.fiware.org> im Auftrag von Pezuela Robles, Clara M <clara.pezuela at atos.net>
Gesendet: Freitag, 23. September 2016 14:05
An: fiware-qualityassurance at lists.fiware.org
Betreff: [Fiware-qualityassurance] Feedback from PC about labeling

Hi all,

This week I had a meeting with Juanjo, PC and deputy chair of TSC, to explain him in detail our work and to collect his feedback before making all public. Here main conclusions:

-          He proposes to add a new label for all GEs to state the level of fulfilment of developers guidelines: https://forge.fiware.org/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/Developer_Guidelines The label must show who is fulfilling the MUST, SHOULD and MAY requirements and set up a label according to this. For him it is a third category beyond the two ones (functional and non-functional). Honestly I am not sure we will have time for doing it, but having in mind to add this category in next testing plan. Here he mentioned Peter, as he was proposing a DevOps approach ☺

-          About the global label, he thinks that using worse value as global value is unfair and a bit bad for FIWARE. He sees fairer to use an average value, and I really agree with him. Having some weights could be also another solution and but now it is not clear which category is more important than others. I made an exercise with him to calculate such labels on the fly, and I attached the updated excel. This also implies then, to adapt the content in the D1.1.8.2.

-          He proposes to keep a separated document for Labeling Model and application, so I will extract the portion of Labelling from D1.1.8.2 once it was completed. And he wants to have it public in the FIWARE web site, quite visible

-          He wants also a brochure about our QA activity for next IoT WG event (October). I think it is really challenging and I am not sure we could do, but I am checking with Ogilvy (press office)

As overall, I think he is quite happy with our work and he bought most of we did ☺

Best regards

Clara Pezuela
Head of IT Market
Research and Innovation Group
ARI website<https://atos.net/en/insights-and-innovation/innovation-labs>
Atos Spain SA
Clara.pezuela at atos.net<mailto:Clara.pezuela at atos.net>
+34 675 62 9974

[cid:image001.png at 01D215A3.7B17B710]



This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it.
As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavors to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted.

Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener información confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente y pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional.
Si usted recibe este correo electrónico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje.
Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningún compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificación escrita por ambas partes.
Aunque se esfuerza al máximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no será responsable de cualesquiera daños que puedan resultar de una transmisión de virus.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-qualityassurance/attachments/20160923/642ca3ac/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 11614 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-qualityassurance/attachments/20160923/642ca3ac/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: pastedImage.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1312 bytes
Desc: pastedImage.png
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-qualityassurance/attachments/20160923/642ca3ac/attachment-0001.png>