Dear all, this is to inform you about the telco I had today with Clara as we discussed topics of interest for all the QA team. *The different values for the labels was due to two different meanings* ... the values reported in the D2.6 under section *3 Functional testing Report* is related only to API testing. This is already explained in the first sentence but to avoid any confusion we decided to rename also the entry on the table from "Functional Label" to "Failure Rate Label" (this reflects also the name we have in the file to compute the labels). Again, in relation to the computation of *Completeness* and *Soundness* we would like to stress that they consider the joint evaluation of Catalogue (Fraunhofer), Academy (GAR) and Documentation (ITESM). The initial question highlighted another issue related to the computation of metrics from Jira. They are the basis for the assignment of three criteria: "Defects by Priority", "Time to Taking charge", "Time to Fix" ... as they are described in D2.5. *At the right moment we don't have a QA partner taking care of these criteria.* We remember that this was a topic on the table at the beginning when we distributed the tasks. In order to address this issue, we suspect that the most suitable solution would be that the FF takes care of this criteria along with the labeling updates (as already agreed). This activity can be supported by the knowledge that the FF has in extracting information from Jira and that the Scrum Master is part of the FF team. In any case we are open to add this points to the agenda for the next QA telco so that we can consolidate understanding and finalize pending decisions. BR Davide, Clara 2018-02-05 22:02 GMT+01:00 Davide Dalle Carbonare < davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it>: > Hi Clara, > sorry for the inconvenience, we double check the labels reported in the > deliverable, tomorrow morning. > > Regarding the documentation, we do not include that evaluation in the > labels computed from functional (API) tests. > > Ciao > Davide > > message sent from mobile ... > > > Il 05 feb 2018 20:27, "Pezuela, Clara" <clara.pezuela at atos.net> ha > scritto: > > Dear Davide, > > > > In your tables at overall section 3, the labels for functional features > don’t match with values in labels’ spreadsheet. Could you please check the > discrepancies and send me updated version of the spreadsheet or correct the > tables in the deliverable? > > > > For example, Proton in your table is A+++ while in the spreadsheet is a > A++. > > > > Another concern is that Ariel is also assigning some labels (according to > what he told me last week), so I don’t know if you have considered also his > labels into the overall functional label. Please, confirm me. > > > > Thanks a lot > > > > Clara Pezuela > > Head of IT Market > > Research and Innovation Group > > ARI booklet > <https://atos.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/atos-ari-2016.pdf> > > Atos Spain SA > > Clara.pezuela at atos.net > > +34 675 62 9974 <+34%20675%2062%2099%2074> > > > > > > > This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended > solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this > e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. > As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group > liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender > endeavors to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not > warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any > damages resulting from any virus transmitted. > > Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener información > confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas > anteriormente y pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. > Si usted recibe este correo electrónico por error, gracias por informar > inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. > Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no > se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningún > compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificación escrita por ambas partes. > Aunque se esfuerza al máximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor > no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no será responsable de cualesquiera > daños que puedan resultar de una transmisión de virus. > > ____________________________________________________________ > ______________________________ > > You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies on the > following links: > - http://forge.fiware.org/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index. > php/FIWARE_Privacy_Policy > - http://forge.fiware.org/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index. > php/Cookies_Policy_FIWARE > > Fiware-qualityassurance mailing list > Fiware-qualityassurance at lists.fiware.org > https://lists.fiware.org/listinfo/fiware-qualityassurance > > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-qualityassurance/attachments/20180206/32c53bd0/attachment-0001.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 4796 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-qualityassurance/attachments/20180206/32c53bd0/attachment-0001.jpg>
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy