[Fiware-qualityassurance] WG: Hi Ariel, sorry for misspelling your name. I did not mean Arial but Ariel.

carmen at grassroots-arts.eu carmen at grassroots-arts.eu
Wed Jun 27 12:25:53 CEST 2018


Hi Ariel

Thank-you that you confirmed that you agree with my proposal below and that you have enough info in the moment from me. Attached I send you once more the info of Grassroots evalution sheet of the courses, which is better formatted than my last input in email and I added some info. Please use this document.. I am just updating the online excel sheet https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Mstfd5kxyO73cOhSKujLpiVrmlbCLWK4crBlVG0rICk/edit#gid=53790661

 

If you have any question, please contact me.

Best Carmen

 

 

 

 

 

Von: Ariel Lucien García Gamboa <ariel.garcia at itesm.mx> 
Gesendet: Dienstag, 26. Juni 2018 18:31
An: carmen at grassroots-arts.eu
Betreff: Re: Hi Ariel, sorry for misspelling your name. I did not mean Arial but Ariel.

 

I think it's enough with this information. Thus, I will work on the labeling to send it asap to Clara

 

 

 

  _____  

De: carmen at grassroots-arts.eu <mailto:carmen at grassroots-arts.eu>  <carmen at grassroots-arts.eu <mailto:carmen at grassroots-arts.eu> >
Enviado: martes, 26 de junio de 2018 9:28:15
Para: Ariel Lucien García Gamboa
Cc: fiware-qualityassurance at lists.fiware.org <mailto:fiware-qualityassurance at lists.fiware.org> ; 'Pezuela, Clara'; 'Davide Dalle Carbonare'
Asunto: AW: Hi Ariel, sorry for misspelling your name. I did not mean Arial but Ariel. 

 

Hi Ariel, sounds good. In which document form or link do you want that I transfer my grades? Is it enough, that I fill out the link Clara provided earlier https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Mstfd5kxyO73cOhSKujLpiVrmlbCLWK4crBlVG0rICk/edit#gid=53790661

 

In this sheet one can not give grades but only choose between the category: planned, executed, impeded, completed. 

 

And when the online course for GE is missing- I say in the online document impeded. Then you can do as you suggested: (when no online courses – in the case I say impeded- are available, the "soundness" measure will be low, since not all the expected information is available, otherwise- in the case I saycompleted-  the "usability" might depend on the soundness and completeness of the installation manuals).

 

Is this enough for you, when I choose one of these categories? I never gave grades. I only gave on the basis of QA criteria the published courses the “Not Good/Sufficient/Good” label by. This label was for my reference in an offline document, which Davide has provided me last May, where noted for myseld good, sufficient (still something missing and I contacted GE owner), or  not good and I also contact GE owner. 

At this my actual state my tested courses in the offline document


ACADEMY COURSES VERIFICATION


 

 

 

 


Chapter 

Course ID

Status

Score


 

 

 

 


Security 

 

 

 


PEP Proxy - Wilma

131 <https://edu.fiware.org/course/view.php?id=131> 

Completed

Good


IdM – KeyRock

79 <https://edu.fiware.org/course/view.php?id=79> 

Completed

Good


PDP AuthZForce

144 <https://edu.fiware.org/course/view.php?id=144> 

Completed

Good


Applications/Services Ecosystem and Delivery Framework 

 

 

 


DataVisualization

141 <https://edu.fiware.org/course/view.php?id=141> 

Completed

 Good


Application Mashup

53 <https://edu.fiware.org/course/view.php?id=53> 

Planned

 


Data/Context Management 

 

 

 


Kurento- Stream oriented (Version 6.6.0)

62 <https://edu.fiware.org/course/view.php?id=62> 

Completed

Good


CEP-Proactive technology PROTON (version 5.4.3)

58 <https://edu.fiware.org/course/view.php?id=58> 

Completed

Good


Big Data

69 <https://edu.fiware.org/course/view.php?id=69> 

Completed

Good


Short Term Historic Open Data Repository (CKAN)

145 <https://edu.fiware.org/course/view.php?id=145> 

Completed

Good


Internet of Things (IoT) Services Enablement 

 

 

 


IoT Broker–AERON

33 <https://edu.fiware.org/course/view.php?id=33> 

Completed

Good


Data Edge Consolidation – Cepheus

36 <https://edu.fiware.org/course/view.php?id=36> 

Completed

Good


IoT Broker

33 <https://edu.fiware.org/course/view.php?id=33> 

Completed

Good


Advanced WebUI 

 

 

 


3D-UI-XML3D

97 <https://edu.fiware.org/course/view.php?id=97> 

Completed

Good


Cloud Rendering

92 <https://edu.fiware.org/course/view.php?id=92> 

Completed

Good


GIS Data Provider

88 <https://edu.fiware.org/course/view.php?id=88> 

Completed

 Sufficient


Interface Designer

91 <https://edu.fiware.org/course/view.php?id=91> 

Completed

 Sufficient


POI Data Provider

96 <https://edu.fiware.org/course/view.php?id=96> 

Completed

Good


Synchronization 

111 <https://edu.fiware.org/course/view.php?id=111> 

Completed

 Good


Virtual Characters

112 <https://edu.fiware.org/course/view.php?id=112> 

Completed

Good


Cloud Hosting

 

 

 


Policy Manager

119 <https://edu.fiware.org/course/view.php?id=119> 

Completed 

 Good

. 

 

Best Carmen

 

Von: Ariel Lucien García Gamboa <ariel.garcia at itesm.mx <mailto:ariel.garcia at itesm.mx> > 
Gesendet: Dienstag, 26. Juni 2018 16:07
An: carmen at grassroots-arts.eu <mailto:carmen at grassroots-arts.eu> 
Cc: fiware-qualityassurance at lists.fiware.org <mailto:fiware-qualityassurance at lists.fiware.org> ; 'Pezuela, Clara' <clara.pezuela at atos.net <mailto:clara.pezuela at atos.net> >; 'Davide Dalle Carbonare' <davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it <mailto:davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it> >
Betreff: Re: Hi Ariel, sorry for misspelling your name. I did not mean Arial but Ariel.

 

OK, then for the labeling, I will try to combine my grades with yours (when no online courses are available, the "soundness" measure will be low, since not all the expected information is available, otherwise the "usability" might depend on the soundness and completeness of the installation manuals). What do you think?

 

I agree to show only the latest tested version

 

 

------------------------------------------------ 

Dr. Ariel Lucien García Gamboa

Director de las carreras

Ing. en Tecnologías Computacionales ITC

Ing. en Tecnologías de Información ITI

Ing. en Negocios y Tecnologías de Información INTI

División de Ingeniería y Ciencias

Santa Fe

Tecnológico de Monterrey

 

Teléfono: +52.55.9177.8100  

Enlace intercampus: 80-273-8100

ariel.garcia at itesm.mx <mailto:ariel.garcia at itesm.mx> 

 <http://www.csf.itesm.mx/> http://www.csf.itesm.mx

 

 El contenido de este mensaje de datos no se considera oferta, propuesta o acuerdo, sino hasta que sea confirmado en documento por escrito que contenga la firma autógrafa del apoderado legal del ITESM. El contenido de este mensaje de datos es confidencial y se entiende dirigido y para uso exclusivo del destinatario, por lo que no podrá distribuirse y/o difundirse por ningún medio sin la previa autorización del emisor original. Si usted no es el destinatario, se le prohíbe su utilización total o parcial para cualquier fin.

The content of this data transmission must not be considered an offer, proposal, understanding or agreement unless it is confirmed in a document signed by a legal representative of ITESM. The content of this data transmission is confidential and is intended to be delivered only to the addressees. Therefore, it shall not be distributed and/or disclosed through any means without the authorization of the original sender. If you are not the addressee, you are forbidden from using it, either totally or partially, for any purpose.

  _____  

De: carmen at grassroots-arts.eu <mailto:carmen at grassroots-arts.eu>  <carmen at grassroots-arts.eu <mailto:carmen at grassroots-arts.eu> >
Enviado: martes, 26 de junio de 2018 8:50:04
Para: Ariel Lucien García Gamboa
Cc: fiware-qualityassurance at lists.fiware.org <mailto:fiware-qualityassurance at lists.fiware.org> ; 'Pezuela, Clara'; 'Davide Dalle Carbonare'
Asunto: AW: Hi Ariel, sorry for misspelling your name. I did not mean Arial but Ariel. 

 

Hi Ariel, 

so let us do it.

I see in my case not really the problem, as I only check the available courses online, there is only one per GE not several. Thanks god. So there is no confusion, that there are several courses for different versions of one GE. Would make anyway no sense. I can follow your example and just use the latest version. Does this makes sense?

 

Best Carmen

 

 

Von: Ariel Lucien García Gamboa <ariel.garcia at itesm.mx <mailto:ariel.garcia at itesm.mx> > 
Gesendet: Dienstag, 26. Juni 2018 15:32
An: carmen at grassroots-arts.eu <mailto:carmen at grassroots-arts.eu> 
Cc: fiware-qualityassurance at lists.fiware.org <mailto:fiware-qualityassurance at lists.fiware.org> ; 'Pezuela, Clara' <clara.pezuela at atos.net <mailto:clara.pezuela at atos.net> >; 'Davide Dalle Carbonare' <davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it <mailto:davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it> >
Betreff: RE: Hi Ariel, sorry for misspelling your name. I did not mean Arial but Ariel.

 

don't worry about the misspelling, Carmen.

 

 

I'm trying to figure out how to combine our work because as Clara said, all our efforts are completely disconnected. I agree with Clara to have an urgent call to try to do a general clarification, then perhaps an individual call to agree on how to assign the labels 

 

 

best regards

 

Ariel

 

 

 

  _____  

De: carmen at grassroots-arts.eu <mailto:carmen at grassroots-arts.eu>  <carmen at grassroots-arts.eu <mailto:carmen at grassroots-arts.eu> >
Enviado: Tuesday, June 26, 2018 8:17:25 AM
Para: Ariel Lucien García Gamboa
CC: fiware-qualityassurance at lists.fiware.org <mailto:fiware-qualityassurance at lists.fiware.org> ; 'Pezuela, Clara'; 'Davide Dalle Carbonare'
Asunto: Hi Ariel, sorry for misspelling your name. I did not mean Arial but Ariel. 

 

Hi Ariel, sorry for misspelling your name. I did not mean Arial but Ariel. 😊

Have a nice day.

 

Best

 

Carmen

 

Von: carmen at grassroots-arts.eu <mailto:carmen at grassroots-arts.eu>  <carmen at grassroots-arts.eu <mailto:carmen at grassroots-arts.eu> > 
Gesendet: Dienstag, 26. Juni 2018 15:12
An: 'Ariel Lucien García Gamboa' <ariel.garcia at itesm.mx <mailto:ariel.garcia at itesm.mx> >
Cc: fiware-qualityassurance at lists.fiware.org <mailto:fiware-qualityassurance at lists.fiware.org> ; 'Pezuela, Clara' <clara.pezuela at atos.net <mailto:clara.pezuela at atos.net> >; 'Davide Dalle Carbonare' <davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it <mailto:davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it> >
Betreff: AW: [Fiware-qualityassurance] Update label spreadsheet

 

Hi Arial;

Clara advised me to ask you directly, what kind of labelling I shall use for the FIWARE Academy Course evaluations. 

For example:

 

As Davide gave the example (see below email):now for the OCB we have test/last-version 

functional: v 1.13

non functional: 1.7

catalogue: -

documentation: 1.8

academy: -

 

 

What makes sense for the Academy course testing in your eyes. I analyse the existing courses online. Shall I state for each course, which version of GE the online course describes? Or shall I rather say which version of course analysis by Grassroots (1.1 first analysis, 1.2 second analysis, 1.3 third analysis). And where shall I put the last version information exactly?

 

Best Carmen

 

Von: carmen at grassroots-arts.eu <mailto:carmen at grassroots-arts.eu>  <carmen at grassroots-arts.eu <mailto:carmen at grassroots-arts.eu> > 
Gesendet: Dienstag, 26. Juni 2018 14:46
An: 'Pezuela, Clara' <clara.pezuela at atos.net <mailto:clara.pezuela at atos.net> >; 'Davide Dalle Carbonare' <davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it <mailto:davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it> >
Cc: 'fiware-qualityassurance at lists.fiware.org' <fiware-qualityassurance at lists.fiware.org <mailto:fiware-qualityassurance at lists.fiware.org> >
Betreff: AW: [Fiware-qualityassurance] Update label spreadsheet

 

HI Clara

 

Ok. I understand. Please give me Ariel’s email, so I can contact him directly

Thank you. So I understand better what to do.

 

Best Carmen

 

 

Von: Pezuela, Clara <clara.pezuela at atos.net <mailto:clara.pezuela at atos.net> > 
Gesendet: Dienstag, 26. Juni 2018 14:44
An: carmen at grassroots-arts.eu <mailto:carmen at grassroots-arts.eu> ; 'Davide Dalle Carbonare' <davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it <mailto:davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it> >
Cc: fiware-qualityassurance at lists.fiware.org <mailto:fiware-qualityassurance at lists.fiware.org> 
Betreff: RE: [Fiware-qualityassurance] Update label spreadsheet

 

The Catalogue is analyzed by Ariel, but the label is affecting both the Catalogue and Academy, so you must talk and agree on a common label for all documentation

 

Best regards

 

Clara Pezuela

Head of IT Market

Research and Innovation Group

 <https://atos.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/atos-ari-2016.pdf> ARI booklet

Atos Spain SA

Clara.pezuela at atos.net <mailto:Clara.pezuela at atos.net>  

+34 675 62 9974

 



 

From: carmen at grassroots-arts.eu <mailto:carmen at grassroots-arts.eu>  [mailto:carmen at grassroots-arts.eu] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2018 2:29 PM
To: Pezuela, Clara; 'Davide Dalle Carbonare'
Cc: fiware-qualityassurance at lists.fiware.org <mailto:fiware-qualityassurance at lists.fiware.org> 
Subject: AW: [Fiware-qualityassurance] Update label spreadsheet

 

Hi Clara, 

I use since long time the offline version, which Davide has send me in May 2017 as detailed analysis tool and I will update the online version asap

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Mstfd5kxyO73cOhSKujLpiVrmlbCLWK4crBlVG0rICk/edit#gid=53790661

I analyse as always only the online course material in the existing Fiware academy (not the Catalogue).

So I will update the spreadsheet above.

Best Carmen

 

Von: Pezuela, Clara <clara.pezuela at atos.net <mailto:clara.pezuela at atos.net> > 
Gesendet: Dienstag, 26. Juni 2018 14:14
An: carmen at grassroots-arts.eu <mailto:carmen at grassroots-arts.eu> ; 'Davide Dalle Carbonare' <davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it <mailto:davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it> >
Cc: fiware-qualityassurance at lists.fiware.org <mailto:fiware-qualityassurance at lists.fiware.org> 
Betreff: RE: [Fiware-qualityassurance] Update label spreadsheet

 

Carmen,

 

About the versions, from the beginning of the project, we created this spreadsheet to monitor the QA tests evolution: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Mstfd5kxyO73cOhSKujLpiVrmlbCLWK4crBlVG0rICk/edit#gid=53790661

 

I guess you are updating here the performed tests in the Academy.

 

The labelling spreadcheet is also in the repository https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1FPHmZNOOqUwSviELE3K1BowP_EyYBl9K

 

And there you must talk to Ariel and agree on which label you set up in conjunction for each GE depending on your analysis both of the Catalogue, Courses and user manuals. Please, feel free to contact

 

Best regards

 

Clara Pezuela

Head of IT Market

Research and Innovation Group

 <https://atos.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/atos-ari-2016.pdf> ARI booklet

Atos Spain SA

Clara.pezuela at atos.net <mailto:Clara.pezuela at atos.net>  

+34 675 62 9974

 



 

From: carmen at grassroots-arts.eu <mailto:carmen at grassroots-arts.eu>  [mailto:carmen at grassroots-arts.eu] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2018 2:09 PM
To: 'Davide Dalle Carbonare'; Pezuela, Clara
Cc: fiware-qualityassurance at lists.fiware.org <mailto:fiware-qualityassurance at lists.fiware.org> 
Subject: AW: [Fiware-qualityassurance] Update label spreadsheet

 

Hi everybody, 

the acadmy has version 1.3.

Do you need any spreadsheet from me and how ?

Best

 

carmen

 

Von: fiware-qualityassurance-bounces at lists.fiware.org <mailto:fiware-qualityassurance-bounces at lists.fiware.org>  <fiware-qualityassurance-bounces at lists.fiware.org <mailto:fiware-qualityassurance-bounces at lists.fiware.org> > Im Auftrag von Davide Dalle Carbonare
Gesendet: Dienstag, 26. Juni 2018 13:08
An: Clara Pezuela <clara.pezuela at atos.net <mailto:clara.pezuela at atos.net> >
Cc: fiware-qualityassurance at lists.fiware.org <mailto:fiware-qualityassurance at lists.fiware.org> 
Betreff: Re: [Fiware-qualityassurance] Update label spreadsheet

 

Sorry if I didn't explained clearly ...

I meant different kind of tests for different versions of the same GE

 

for example now for the OCB we have test/last-version:

functional: v 1.13

non functional: 1.7

catalogue: -

documentation: 1.8

academy: -

 

do you see what I mean?




 

 

Il giorno mar 26 giu 2018 alle ore 12:59 Pezuela, Clara <clara.pezuela at atos.net <mailto:clara.pezuela at atos.net> > ha scritto:

Davide,

 

In my opinion we must provide labels for the latest version, even if it is not the same for all of them. Labels are independent from one GE to another one, so I don’t any problem in that Orion GE version was 5.4.0 and Kurento GE version was 2.0.0 (invented :)).

 

When the labels are shown in the Catalogue, the version of GE is there, so just to put a disclaimer in the window saying that these labels correspond to the indicated version of the GE in the Catalogue.

 

This requires that versions of GE were updated always in the Catalogue to the latest one

 

Best regards

 

Clara Pezuela

Head of IT Market

Research and Innovation Group

 <https://atos.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/atos-ari-2016.pdf> ARI booklet

Atos Spain SA

Clara.pezuela at atos.net <mailto:Clara.pezuela at atos.net>  

+34 675 62 9974

 



 

From: Davide Dalle Carbonare [mailto:davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2018 12:47 PM
To: Pezuela, Clara; Stefano De Panfilis
Cc: Ariel Lucien García Gamboa; fiware-qualityassurance at lists.fiware.org <mailto:fiware-qualityassurance at lists.fiware.org> 
Subject: Re: Update label spreadsheet

 

Dear Clara, Stefano,

  we have those info a in separate file and as we keep them per single test, they are related to a specific version of the GE ... now the question is ... which version do we have to take into account to report the numbers in the labeling file? 

 

Reporting only the last one tested would be in line with what has been done done so far ... but this still suffer from an inconsistency among versions and kind of test (part of the labeling).

 

What do you think?

 

BR

Davide

 

 

Il giorno lun 25 giu 2018 alle ore 11:22 Pezuela, Clara <clara.pezuela at atos.net <mailto:clara.pezuela at atos.net> > ha scritto:

Dear all,

 

For the public link with QA data, I would like to add current list of labels, so the labels spreadsheet MUST be immediately updated.

 

For each GE tab, you will see a table like this one:

 


Attribute

Measure name

Gathered Value

Label (A+++/C)

Notes/Comments/ Objective Evidences (OE)


Usability

Completeness <> 

Good

A+

The Open spec and the installation guide are complete.


Soundness <> 

Good

A+

All expected information is available.


Reliability

Failure Rate <> 

0,14

A++

TF/TE (17/119) for 5.4.0 version


Defects by Priority <> 

1,75

A+

They were found major and minor errors (functional or documental)


Efficiency

Time to Taking charge <> 

9,9

B

The taking charge time is a bit slow


Time to Fix <> 

2,6

A++

The fixing time is very fast

 

I took Keyrock as example, because it is urgent to re-test this GE as new version has come up and it is essential to have updated results before meeting in Berlin (3-4 July).

 

But same exercise MUST be done for all GEs.

 

Davide, could you please be sure that the functional labels related to Reliability contained in the file are updated for all GEs? If not, could you please add accordingly?

 

Ariel/Carmen, please the same for labels about Usability.

 

Stefano, please the same for Efficiency, from the data which is collected by the Foundation in Jira system.

 

All label for non-functional aspects are already updated

 

DEADLINE: 3 of July Please mark the changes you did by coloring cells in yellow. I will calculate overall labels, I just need you to change the values per tab/GE

 

Thanks a lot

 

Clara Pezuela

Head of IT Market

Research and Innovation Group

 <https://atos.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/atos-ari-2016.pdf> ARI booklet

Atos Spain SA

Clara.pezuela at atos.net <mailto:Clara.pezuela at atos.net>  

+34 675 62 9974

 

 

 

 

This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. 
As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavors to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. 

Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener información confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente y pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. 
Si usted recibe este correo electrónico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. 
Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningún compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificación escrita por ambas partes. 
Aunque se esfuerza al máximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no será responsable de cualesquiera daños que puedan resultar de una transmisión de virus. 

This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. 
As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavors to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. 

Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener información confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente y pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. 
Si usted recibe este correo electrónico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. 
Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningún compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificación escrita por ambas partes. 
Aunque se esfuerza al máximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no será responsable de cualesquiera daños que puedan resultar de una transmisión de virus. 

This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. 
As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavors to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. 

Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener información confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente y pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. 
Si usted recibe este correo electrónico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. 
Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningún compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificación escrita por ambas partes. 
Aunque se esfuerza al máximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no será responsable de cualesquiera daños que puedan resultar de una transmisión de virus.

This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. 
As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavors to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. 

Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener información confidencial destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente y pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional. 
Si usted recibe este correo electrónico por error, gracias por informar inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje. 
Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, Atos no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no constituye ningún compromiso para el grupo Atos, salvo ratificación escrita por ambas partes. 
Aunque se esfuerza al máximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no será responsable de cualesquiera daños que puedan resultar de una transmisión de virus.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-qualityassurance/attachments/20180627/73cb59c5/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 4796 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-qualityassurance/attachments/20180627/73cb59c5/attachment-0001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Course_Evaluation_Report_27062018.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 18047 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-qualityassurance/attachments/20180627/73cb59c5/attachment-0001.docx>


More information about the Fiware-qualityassurance mailing list

You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy   Cookies policy