[Fiware-robotics] R: R: R: First proposal of Robotics Platform GE

[Antonini Roberto]

Fine for me. At 5 pm I have to go.
Roberto


Inviato da Samsung Mobile



-------- Messaggio originale --------
Oggetto:[Fiware-robotics] R: R: First proposal of Robotics Platform GE
Da:Garino Pierangelo <pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it>
A:Angel Hernandez <ahernandez at ikergune.com>,"fiware-robotics at lists.fi-ware.org" <fiware-robotics at lists.fi-ware.org>
Cc:


Hi All,  it happens that at the same time there is a call for closing the CA and some of us might need to attend. What about postponing our call at 15:00 same day?
Pier



Inviato da Samsung Mobile



-------- Messaggio originale --------
Da: Angel Hernandez <ahernandez at ikergune.com>
Data:
A: Garino Pierangelo <pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it>,fiware-robotics at lists.fi-ware.org
Oggetto: Re: [Fiware-robotics] R: First proposal of Robotics Platform GE


Pier, thats the same time as the CA call.
What a coincidence. Can we do it later on tuesday, maybe at 12?


Sent from: Lenovo K910

Garino Pierangelo <pierangelo.garino at telecomitalia.it> wrote:


Hello Fernando and All,

 I take the opportunity of your mail to organize a first confcall on the topic: my proposal is to have it on Tuesday Oct 7th, at 11:00 CEST.

Are you all available?

BR
Pier


-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: fiware-robotics-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [mailto:fiware-robotics-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] Per conto di Fernando Herranz
Inviato: giovedì 2 ottobre 2014 17:45
A: fiware-robotics at lists.fi-ware.org
Oggetto: Re: [Fiware-robotics] First proposal of Robotics Platform GE

Hello Roberto and all,

My name is Fernando, I am part of the robotic team from Etxe-tar. I met some of you during the last kick-off meeting in Madrid.

We have been reviewing your platform and we think it looks good, so far I think we should clarify what is the role of kiara in this robotic generic enabler.

I have noticed that there is no kiara node between the IoT and Robotic GE. After the last meeting, it did look very clear that we should take it into account.

Piere, Thomas, What do you think about that? we would really like to have a conference call with you guys for two reason. First, to discuss about this topic and second to introduce you to some other people from our team.

Cheers
________________________________________
De: Angel Hernandez
Enviado el: jueves, 02 de octubre de 2014 17:26
Para: Jose Jaime Ariza; Fernando Herranz
Asunto: RV: First proposal of Robotics Platform GE

De: Antonini Roberto [mailto:roberto1.antonini at telecomitalia.it]
Enviado el: lunes, 29 de septiembre de 2014 16:33
Para: Angel Hernandez
CC: Garino Pierangelo; Gaspardone Marco; Thomas Michael Bohnert (thomas.bohnert at zhaw.ch)
Asunto: R: First proposal of Robotics Platform GE

Hi Angel,
this last period, for us, is very intensive and we struggle so much at  following everything, sorry for my late reply!!
Here attached is a slight evolution of our reference architecture, in the last slide you can find a very first proposal of integration of our architecture in FIWARE one, where should be clear the specific interactions and the role of each components, in the following a brief explanation:

·         RCM modules represents robot clones into platform, that is the so called “remote brain” where “neurons”, in the form of ROS nodes, run to solve complex problem. the modules can reside both at backend side, to aggregate as much as possible sharing functionalities, and gateway side, to be more specific for a definite set of robots.

·         FIBOT modules, in my opinion, could be represent a both a bridge to empower specific NGSI robot APIs and protocol adapter to translates robot sensors into “things” of IoT domain,
Mine it’s only a proposal to try to finalize our discussion, in order to converge to a definite and shared reference architecture, therefore feel free to integrate and redefine everything concerning FIBOT.
I hope we are not so far, conceptually speaking ;-)

My Best,
                Roberto.


Da: Angel Hernandez [mailto:ahernandez at ikergune.com]
Inviato: giovedì 18 settembre 2014 08:30
A: Antonini Roberto
Cc: Garino Pierangelo; Gaspardone Marco
Oggetto: RE: First proposal of Robotics Platform GE

Hello Roberto,
Sorry for my late reply, I have been on another business trip.
My team has been working on some scenarios. I also sent them your email and gave some suggestions.
Please let me put all together in a presentation and I will distribute it asap.
Also, Thank you for the invitation ☺ these days are a little bit complicated because we are moving into a new office in a different city (Bilbao, good food) and I really don’t have much time to travel until we get done with it. What about planning a trip in November? I would also like to invite you to our new office as soon as we are done moving ☺

I’ll email you more info later today.

Thanks!



De: Antonini Roberto [mailto:roberto1.antonini at telecomitalia.it]
Enviado el: martes, 16 de septiembre de 2014 10:10
Para: Angel Hernandez
CC: Garino Pierangelo; Gaspardone Marco
Asunto: First proposal of Robotics Platform GE

Hi Angel,
I hope you had a pleasant journey on your way back home. Just a recap of what we agreed during Madrid meeting:

·         Defining two (max three) scenarii for declining robotics into FIWare context, for describing each scenario I would adopt classical bottom-up approach, i.e. starting from robot perspective until FIWARE APIs to expose to external users (SME).

·         From above scenarii, trying to define what are functionalities on which we’d like to work, according to DoW.  To better identify IoT domain and, let’s say, “cloud” domain for robotics, we propose the following scope separation:

o   Data from/to IoT, to switch on lamps and collect temperature data.

o   Data from/to “Cloud”, to ask cloud to solve problems robots  encounter during operations, hence: moving robot from point A to point B; how to manage a door handle; how to grab a beer and so on…

One of the entry points could be an API tells FIWARE Platform to move a robot to a well-defined point,  the way robots avoid obstacles recognize objects and so on, is not expose outside but is solve internally.



In attached PPT a very first draft of our scenario and a very first architecture proposal , we‘d like to know if you agree the methodology above described and we wait for your comments and functionalities/scenario proposal.



For further clarifications, we can hear in a conf call.

P.S. As I told you in Madrid , we’d like to invite you to visit our laboratories here in Turin. Let me know when you are available.

BR
Roberto.





Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie.

This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks.
[cid:image001.gif at 01CFDBFE.6512A2D0]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non è necessario.


_______________________________________________
Fiware-robotics mailing list
Fiware-robotics at lists.fi-ware.org
https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-robotics
_______________________________________________
Fiware-robotics mailing list
Fiware-robotics at lists.fi-ware.org
https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-robotics
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-robotics/attachments/20141002/ae7ba64c/attachment.html>