[Fiware-soulfi-coaching] Fwd: Re: [Fiware-general] recommended fiware enablers

Nuno Varandas (gmail) nvarandas.nv at gmail.com
Wed May 13 12:43:14 CEST 2015


Hi Sergio,

Based on you comments and scoring we will end up with less companies that
are required... we need 51 companies! So the best criteria I would use is "a
chance should be given. 1.5 total FIWARE grade should be the limit". Find
enclose the potential selection of these 51 companies.

Even-though we will put out 12 companies that had a score that could be
easily financed (for instance the "Rokubun" company, which was the one with
better scoring from external evaluators). For this reason and for these
companies (OUT by FIWARE) I kindly ask you for additional comments.
While doing so please put yourself in their shoes, how they would be
convinced the reason why they were desclassified. For instance for
"Rokubun" you wrote "Only 1 GE mentioned. Although its intended usage seems
core in the architecture, the way it is used seems to be weird and atypical
(forced)." If I was that company I would complain a lot!

I thank you in advance for your support.
best regards,


2015-05-12 1:17 GMT+01:00 SERGIO GARCIA GOMEZ <
sergio.garciagomez at telefonica.com>:

>  Dear Nuno,
>
> Please find attach the result of this evaluation. Let me point that out
> that from my (FIWARE) point of view, there were in general more interesting
> proposals in the first round. Regarding this round, these are the main
> criteria:
>
>
>
> Ges (0-2) Number of relevant GEs used and how they are intended to be used
>
> Arch (0-1) How important are FIWARE GEs in the solution architecture.
>
> Cloud (0-1) If the cloud is used.
>
> Idea (+-1) If the idea is a good one, with good potential (even if it’s
> not well explained in the proposal).
>
>
>
> FIWARE Grade (the sum of above).
>
>
>
> From my point of view, those with “GEs < 1 and Idea < 1” should not be
> qualified to go on, even in round A. Whenever Idea == 1,  a chance should
> be given. 1.5 total FIWARE grade should be the limit, just evaluate how to
> proceed depending on the other factors.
>
> Of course, in a round B a FIWARE Grade should be >=2.5 to go on, but this
> is not the case.
>
>
>
> I have provided comments on all the proposals. If you need additional
> details in any of them, especially if they are going to be rejected, just
> let me know.
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
>
>
> Sergio.
>
>
>
>
>
> *De:* fiware-soulfi-coaching-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org [mailto:
> fiware-soulfi-coaching-bounces at lists.fi-ware.org] *En nombre de *Nuno
> Varandas (gmail)
> *Enviado el:* 06 May 2015 20:39
> *Para:* fiware-soulfi-coaching at lists.fi-ware.org
> *Asunto:* [Fiware-soulfi-coaching] Fwd: Re: [Fiware-general] recommended
> fiware enablers
>
>
>
> Dear Sergio,
> There is a mailjng list fromnthe guys from the fiware foundation that i
> think someone from fi-core should be present... see below the discussion.
>
> Nuno
>
> Sent from a mobile device. Please excuse brevity and tpyos.
>
> ---------- Mensagem encaminhada ----------
> De: <m.ross at digital-worx.de>
> Data: 05/05/2015 12:18
> Assunto: Re: [Fiware-general] recommended fiware enablers
> Para: <fiware-general at lists.dyne.org>
> Cc:
>
> Adding to Piotr: we also had Object Storage in the stack. And we decided
> not to use Object Storage due problems and missing functions in the FIWARE
> LAB. Which at all leads into the conseqence not to use FIWARE LAB at all.
>
> Mirko
>
>
> Am 2015-05-05 09:42, schrieb Piotr Pawałowski:
>
> Hi,
>
> we are using Kurento and Object Storage. Kurento looks pretty well,
> but Object Storage in the FIWARE Lab is not working very stable.
>
> BR,
>
> Piotr
>
>
>
> W dniu 2015-05-04 o 15:05, Tobias Wunner pisze:
>
> Hi, we are looking into integrating Fiware enablers. Are there any
> enablers with which you can specifically recommend and run stable?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Tobias
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fiware-general mailing list
> Fiware-general at lists.dyne.org
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fiware-general
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fiware-general mailing list
> Fiware-general at lists.dyne.org
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fiware-general
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fiware-general mailing list
> Fiware-general at lists.dyne.org
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fiware-general
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario,
> puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso
> exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el
> destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilización,
> divulgación y/o copia sin autorización puede estar prohibida en virtud de
> la legislación vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos
> que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su
> destrucción.
>
> The information contained in this transmission is privileged and
> confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
> entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended
> recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
> copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received
> this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the
> sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete
> it.
>
> Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinatário,
> pode conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial e é para uso exclusivo
> da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se não é vossa senhoria o destinatário
> indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utilização, divulgação e/ou
> cópia sem autorização pode estar proibida em virtude da legislação vigente.
> Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique
> imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destruição
>



-- 
Nuno Varandas

Mobile: +351 93 528 2318
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-soulfi-coaching/attachments/20150513/c7833564/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 20150512_SOUL-FI_RoundA2_FinalEvaluation.xlsx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet
Size: 1800332 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-soulfi-coaching/attachments/20150513/c7833564/attachment.xlsx>


More information about the Fiware-soulfi-coaching mailing list

You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy   Cookies policy