On 28/10/12 13:14, Juanjo Hierro wrote: > Hola, > > ¿ Hay alguna razón que conozcáis por la que esté empezando a recibir > multitud de mensajes de la lista fusionforge-bugs ? > > ¿ Tal vez porque habéis subscrito la lista fiware-support a esa lista o > algo así ? ¿Puedes enviarme una cabecera del mensaje para decirte de donde viene? Saludos, Luis. > > Saludos, > > -- Juanjo Hierro > > ------------- > Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital > website:www.tid.es > email:jhierro at tid.es > twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro > > FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect > > You can follow FI-WARE at: > website:http://www.fi-ware.eu > facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 > twitter:http://twitter.com/FIware > linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 > > > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: [fusionforge-Bugs][237] [plugin/oslc] should render complete > <rdf:RDF prefix for XML documents > Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 10:54:26 +0100 > From: <fusionforge-bugs at fusionforge.org> > Reply-To: <fusionforge-bugs at fusionforge.org> > To: <noreply at fusionforge.org> > > > > fusionforge-Bugs item #237 was changed at 2012-10-28 10:54 by Franck VILLAUME > You can respond by visiting: > https://fusionforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105&aid=237&group_id=6 > > Status: Closed > Priority: 3 > Submitted By: Olivier Berger (olberger) > Assigned to: Sabri LABBENE (labbenes) > Summary: [plugin/oslc] should render complete<rdf:RDF prefix for XML documents >>Target Release: 5.2 > Found in Version: trunk > Severity: major > Resolution: Fixed > > > Initial Comment: > Hi. > > The specs indicate that the XML representation should validate RDF. > > Thus the content should contain prefixes for RDF. For instance : > > <?xml version="1.0"?> > <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" > xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oslc_disc="http://open-services.net/xmlns/discovery/1.0/" > > <oslc_disc:ServiceProviderCatalog rdf:about=""> > ... > </oslc_disc:ServiceProviderCatalog> > </rdf:RDF> > > instead of : > <?xml version="1.0"?> > <oslc_disc:ServiceProviderCatalog xmlns:oslc_disc="http://open-services.net/xmlns/discovery/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" rdf:about=""> > > Thanks in advance. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Comment By: Olivier Berger (olberger) > Date: 2011-01-19 13:49 > > Message: > Actually, this may not be problematic as long as there's only one resource, and the<rdf:RDF enclosing entity is not necessary, per RDF/XML specs. > > However, its is required (http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/OSLCCoreSpecAppendixRepresentations#Steps_to_generate_an_XML_represe) that this is done for application/xml representation, so I guess we should do it too for application/rdf+xml > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > You can respond by visiting: > https://fusionforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105&aid=237&group_id=6 > . > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar > nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace > situado más abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-support mailing list > Fiware-support at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-support -- |\_____/| Luis Cañas-Díaz [o] [o] lcanas at bitergia.com - Software Engineer | V | http://www.bitergia.com | | "Bridging the gap between developers and stakeholders" -ooo-ooo-
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy