[Fiware-tech-help] Authorize PDP GE

Tran Quang Thanh thanh.quang.tran at fokus.fraunhofer.de
Thu Feb 12 14:41:44 CET 2015


Dear Cyril, all,
Thank you very much for your support and information. I am waiting for 
your configuration file :-)

As far as I understand (correct me if I am wrong), in the upcoming 
access control model, the connection between Authorized PDP and IdM (the 
Attribute Finder) has been removed. This makes the IdM and PDP somehow 
more generic and independent, however it might raise a new issue as I 
mention in the following:

As you know, in other domains such as our healthcare domain, one of the 
reason that we are interested in XACML access control model because of 
the flexible capability to create access policies based on many 
attributes. Such policies will use not only XACML standard attributes 
(e.g. subject-id, resource-id, time etc.) but also our domain-specific 
attributes. For example, we have a policy like this:
"Doctor can access medical records of patients from their medical 
center. Other doctors can access patient records in case of emergency".
In such policy, we adopt two user domain-specific attributes: care 
provider and emergency status

With new architecture, to be sure such attributes can still be extract 
from token (if the IdM support) but how the PEP Proxy decide which 
attributes to include in the XACML request (do we need to include all 
user attributes in the request ?) and when the request contains such 
domain-specific attributes, how the PDP understand such attributes in 
order to validate the request without communicate with IdM ?

The same concern to the support of domain specific attributes is to the 
only FIWARE IdM KeyRock GEri. Does it support a flexible mechanism to 
deal with this (e.g. through API or some configuration) ? As far as I 
know, the GCP IdM supports such functionality through API that allowing 
user create new attributes.

If the GE owner or someone in the list can support, please help us to 
clarify this.
Thank you very much,

Bests,
Tran



On 11.02.2015 17:48, DANGERVILLE Cyril wrote:
>   the PEP

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-tech-help/attachments/20150212/2a9b8c87/attachment.html>


More information about the Fiware-tech-help mailing list

You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy   Cookies policy