[Fiware-tech-help] [FIWARE-JIRA] (HELP-6964) FIWARE.Request.Tech.Security.AuthorizationPDP.Securing verbs via the PEP proxy

[Fernando Lopez (JIRA)]

    [ https://jira.fiware.org/browse/HELP-6964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=54610#comment-54610 ] 

Fernando Lopez edited comment on HELP-6964 at 9/24/19 8:44 AM:
---------------------------------------------------------------

Hello, 
I noticed that you are still using an invalid URL for ACCESS_CONTROL_URL (http://idm.dev.babbler.io:8080/authzforce-ce/domains/...) Maybe I was not clear in one of my previous emails, but you should not have the URL path. It should be ACCESS_CONTROL_URL = 'http://idm.dev.babbler.io:8080'

So if the ACCESS_CONTROL_MAGIC_KEY is not necessary, as Alvaro mentioned, can you try again with the following configuration?

{noformat}
ACCESS_CONTROL_URL = 'http://idm.dev.babbler.io:8080'
ACCESS_CONTROL_MAGIC_KEY = 'undefined'
{noformat}

Thanks.




was (Author: cyril.dangerville):
The issue has been emailed: \\
- Time sent: *29/Aug/16 6:24 PM*
- To: *c.meijer at itude.com*
- Cc: *k.patenaude at itude.com,c.houtman at itude.com,e.bon at itude.com,aalonsog at dit.upm.es *
- with subject: *[Fiware-tech-help] Securing verbs via the PEP proxy*
 \\

----
Hello, 
I noticed that you are still using an invalid URL for ACCESS_CONTROL_URL (http://idm.dev.babbler.io:8080/authzforce-ce/domains/...) Maybe I was not clear in one of my previous emails, but you should not have the URL path. It should be ACCESS_CONTROL_URL = 'http://idm.dev.babbler.io:8080'

So if the ACCESS_CONTROL_MAGIC_KEY is not necessary, as Alvaro mentioned, can you try again with the following configuration?

{noformat}
ACCESS_CONTROL_URL = 'http://idm.dev.babbler.io:8080'
ACCESS_CONTROL_MAGIC_KEY = 'undefined'
{noformat}

Thanks.



> FIWARE.Request.Tech.Security.AuthorizationPDP.Securing verbs via the PEP proxy
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HELP-6964
>                 URL: https://jira.fiware.org/browse/HELP-6964
>             Project: Help-Desk
>          Issue Type: extRequest
>          Components: FIWARE-TECH-HELP
>            Reporter: FW External User
>            Assignee: Alvaro Alonso
>         Attachments: 2016-09-05 08_57_48.486 21 INFO eventlet.wsgi.txt, Logs IDM_Horizon after creating permission_HTTP.txt rule in IDM, ParseError at _idm_myApplications_fdae7d987c6a435188a2200e31cac4db_edit_roles_.html
>
>
> Hello,
> We would like to secure out ContextBroker so POSTS are allowed, but a
> DELETE isn't. We've asked you about this and you've said we should do the
> following:
> * You can configure as many PEPs as you want. You have only to modify the
> > listening port.
> > * You can configure an AuthZForce in
> > https://github.com/ging/horizon/blob/master/openstack_dashboard/local/local_settings.py.example#L629.
> > You only need to configure the URL in which it is listening
> > * To configure PEP to work with AuthZForce you have to use the Level 2 of
> > security. Here you will find tutorials about this:
> > https://edu.fiware.org/course/view.php?id=131
> We've tried this, but we've had the following problems:
>    - If we pull the docker image of
>    fiware/authzforce-ce-server:release-5.4.0 or release-5.3.0a, the image
>    starts, but shuts down after a few seconds after which the logs state that
>    tomcat 7 can't be started.
>    - When we run fiware/authzforce-ce-server:release-4.4.1b, we get a
>    tomcat with no webapp in the webapps directory other than the default
>    stuff.
>    - Performing a manual installation using this guide
>    <http://authzforce-ce-fiware.readthedocs.io/en/release-5.3.0a/InstallationAndAdministrationGuide.html#installation>
> will
>    have the same result.
> In your previous mail, it is stated that we need AuthZForce. However,
> Keypass seems to do something similar. Can you explain the difference?
> Can you help us with this?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.1#64016)