[Fiware-technical-committee] FIWARE Summit programme?

[Davide Dalle Carbonare]

Dear all,
  due to an unexpected issue I cannot attend the call today ... I try to
connect later but I cannot guarantee.
I apologize.

BR
Davide


2016-11-20 16:24 GMT+01:00 Alex Glikson <GLIKSON at il.ibm.com>:

> Sorry, I meant on day 1, the 13th.
>
> Alex
>
>
>
> From:        Alex Glikson/Haifa/IBM
> To:        Juanjo Hierro <juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com>
> Cc:        FIWARE Technical Steering Committee <
> fiware-technical-committee at lists.fiware.org>
> Date:        20/11/2016 05:22 PM
> Subject:        Re: [Fiware-technical-committee] FIWARE Summit programme?
> ------------------------------
>
>
> Thanks for the clarification.
> Even if we have enough rooms, having more than 2 parallel sessions might
> not necessarily be a good idea - unless we expect very large and diverse
> audience.
> An idea: give that there seems to be no 'conference' track on day 2, maybe
> it will be enough to add the second (technical) track on day-2,
> distinguishing between 'basic' tutorials (track 1) and 'advanced' topics
> (track 2).
> Let's discuss.
>
> Regards,
> Alex
>
>
>
>
> From:        Juanjo Hierro <juanjose.hierro at telefonica.com>
> To:        Alex Glikson/Haifa/IBM at IBMIL, FIWARE Technical Steering
> Committee <fiware-technical-committee at lists.fiware.org>
> Date:        20/11/2016 05:05 PM
> Subject:        Re: [Fiware-technical-committee] FIWARE Summit programme?
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> Hi Alex,
>
>   Yes, we should try to progress on this during our confcall tomorrow.
> Let's focus the call on that matter.
>
>   Regarding the issue about number of talks, let me tell you that we will
> have plenty of rooms avaiable to setup some of them in parallel.
> Therefore, that is not a problem.
>
>   We for sure will have an auditorium, which set up in "class room" style
> will be able to accomodate around 100 people.   This will be the one for
> the "Developers' primer" during the first day and would be available for
> the second and third day to host those talks we expect more audience for.
> But there will be additional smaller rooms which may accomodate 35 people
> or 15 (there are two kind of rooms).
>
>   What I believe we need to decide/revise is:
>
>    - What talks are relevant (i.e., we feel confident they may attract
>    enough audience inside and outside the OS Community)
>    - What talks are missing (I have the feeling that some chapters
>    haven't contributed so much)
>    - How we may organize them (how many parallel rooms we need, which
>    talks we left for the auditorium and which ones for smaller rooms) in a way
>    that doesn't collide with f2f chapter meetings
>    - What rooms of what size we need for chapter f2f meetings, and when
>    those meetings will take place so they can coexist with the parallel talks
>    (I rather believe that if somone from a chapter gives a talk on a GE or
>    relevant matter for that chapter, the rest of the chapter should attend).
>
>   Let's discuss all this tomorrow.
>
>   Cheers,
>
> -- Juanjo
>
>
> On 20/11/2016 15:24, Alex Glikson wrote:
> Can someone update on the status of the technical programme for the summit?
> Based on the spreadsheets, it seems that we have proposals for roughly 13
> hours of talks, and roughly 5-6 hours of available time.
> Also, it is difficult to find any correlation between the proposed talks
> in the "programme" spreadsheet and the talks already included on the
> "agenda" spreadsheet (tutorials?).
> What is the process of finalizing the programme? Who is in charge?
> I think we *have to* finalize it this week - ideally tomorrow. Otherwise
> people might not have enough time to secure their attendance (in some cases
> having a talk at the summit may enable people to get internal approvals to
> travel).
>
> Regards,
> Alex
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fiware-technical-committee mailing list
> *Fiware-technical-committee at lists.fiware.org*
> <Fiware-technical-committee at lists.fiware.org>
> *https://lists.fiware.org/listinfo/fiware-technical-committee*
> <https://lists.fiware.org/listinfo/fiware-technical-committee>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fiware-technical-committee mailing list
> Fiware-technical-committee at lists.fiware.org
> https://lists.fiware.org/listinfo/fiware-technical-committee
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-technical-committee/attachments/20161121/e7fa331c/attachment.html>