[Fiware-technical-committee] URGENT: reviewers owning FIWARE expertise for evaluation of smart manufacturing open call

Francisco Melendez francisco.melendez at fiware.org
Sat Jan 25 11:02:08 CET 2020


Dear All,
I think that I have answered all the emails in which you were offering as
candidates to participate in the list of potential evaluators for the DIH^2
experiment proposals.
Since we experienced some problems with the forwarding of the emails,
please,* email** me directly *if I did not give an answer to your original
message. (francisco.melendez at fiware.org)

Best Regards
--
Francisco Melendez
Technical Expert
francisco.melendez at fiware.org
www.linkedin.com/in/franmelfer











On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 2:42 PM Juanjo Hierro <juanjose.hierro at fiware.org>
wrote:

> Dear all,
>
>   I'm approaching you with a kindly request for which we need a rather
> quick response.
>
>   The DIH^2 project
> <http://dih-squared.eu/content/we-accelerate-factories-through-robotics>
> launched a first Open Call looking for manufacturing SMEs and
> solution/technology providers that will be funded for the creation of
> experiments piloting robotic solutions that may help to implement agile
> manufacturing (not just of industrial products but also food and other
> products).
>
>   It is expected that proposed solutions will use FIWARE at least to
> become FIWARE-ready, i.e., exporting through NGSI their main
> functionalities so they can be integrated into a system of systems
> architecture in a Factory.
>
>   Proposals submitted will be evaluated and those who have been involved
> in previous programs know how crucial it is to select good experiments and
> solutions which have the potential to take the most out of FIWARE, that
> provide a good rationale how they plan to use FIWARE which shows they have
> a good understanding of FIWARE technologies.  This as opposed to candidates
> which probably are just joining with the intent of getting the money and
> run.
>
>   Unfortunately the team managing the open call evaluation process hadn't
> taken into account the need to involve evaluators who can judge properly
> submitted application with respect to usage of FIWARE.   We just realized
> about that last week and have negotiated with the coordinator the extension
> of the window for selection of evaluators.   We have promised to deliver a
> list of evaluators by EOB this Monday January 27th.
>
>   Therefore, *we need to compile a good list of evaluators with a FIWARE
> expertise who can contribute to evaluate submitted applications.   The task
> will be remunerated.*
>
>   Francisco will send you right after this mail the planned calendar when
> the evaluation will take place and what would be the costs that will be
> reimbursed.
>
>   If you are interested in joining please send your name to Francisco.
> This project is strategic for the positioning of FIWARE in Smart Industry
> so please pay attention to this request.
>
>   Cheers,
> --
> Juanjo Hierro
> Chief Technology Officer
> juanjose.hierro at fiware.org
> www.linkedin.com/in/jhierro
> Twitter: @fiware <https://twitter.com/fiware> @JuanjoHierro
> <https://twitter.com/JuanjoHierro>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-technical-committee/attachments/20200125/dc396c41/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: foundation-logo.png
Type: image/png
Size: 8201 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-technical-committee/attachments/20200125/dc396c41/attachment-0001.png>


More information about the Fiware-technical-committee mailing list

You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy   Cookies policy