Another question about JIRA issues & work conventions: are we expected to rename issues created by others? For example this old one (completed last year) by Henar which shows as red in the review, due to having a free form name: https://jira.fiware.org:8443/browse/WEB-111 "WebTundra image to be uploaded to FI-LAB" ~Toni On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 8:37 AM, Toni Alatalo <toni at playsign.net> wrote: > Thanks for the infos and notes Torsten, despite being ill even -- I > hope you get better soon! > > Manuel, about the errors the backlog review system reports: > > What is the GEi name we should use for WebTundra? > > It seems to give an error when I use WebTundra. In JIRA the component > seems to be named that. > > I tried to fix the naming for this old work item that reports the > traffic visualization work made in the FIDEMO project / amendment for > old FIWARE last year: > > https://jira.fiware.org:8443/browse/WEB-123 > FIWARE.WorkItem.WebUI.WebTundra.CreateTrafficVisualizationForDemo > > The review for that says: > WEB-123WorkItemWebUI.WebTundra.CreateTrafficVisualizationForDemo > Closed Major Sprint 4.1.3Toni Alatalo >>>> Reference.5 > Test for reference - 4th field: GE-GEI keyword > > The 4th field is 'WebTundra' so seems that it does not accept it as a > GE-GEI keyword? Perhaps there is a bug in the review system? > > For XML3D it seems to work as for example WEB-248 shows as green and > it has the implementation name there similarily (and no GE i.e. 3DUI > name anywhere): > FIWARE.WorkItem.WebUI.XML3D.Backlog.Review > > I was checking Torsten's instructions and also the documentation for > the naming in https://forge.fiware.org/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/How_to_assign_identifiers_to_FI-WARE_Backlog_entries_%28convention_to_follow%29 > > But so far have no way to make the checker happy. > > Also, Tiina just emailed me to inform that they'd gone through > Adminotech's all entries with Manuel before her holiday (1,5 weeks > ago) and I understood that they'd been in shape then. I don't > understand how though as most the WebTundra entries are not according > to the naming convention yet -- unless work was lost in the JIRA > corruption that happened at one point. > > For e.g. Synchronization (Tundra) it seems to work, in > http://backlog.fiware.org/enabler/Synch-Tundra/dashboard -- those are > also named according to the pattern. > > BTW for the demo deliverables I was also trying to understand how to > use the software.create, .deliver etc. but concluded that those are > only for actual GE releases. For workitems the documentation says > simply: "WorkItem: FIWARE.WorkItem.Chapter.Enabler.WorkItemId" so i > went with that single term as the WorkItemId, > CreateTrafficVisualizationForDemo .. lacking better ideas. > > ~Toni > > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 7:14 AM, Torsten Spieldenner > <torsten.spieldenner at dfki.de> wrote: >> Good morning, >> >> I have to cancel today's call. >> >> Philipp is travelling, and I got ill yesterday. >> >> I still prepared the minutes. You can find the topics that were planned for >> today here: >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sfUYTdo6DugZeXwQCzd9UYYO_hGAY0k6OOqahi42_To/edit#heading=h.rt0nkx8hmxxg >> >> Please have a look at it and check what is on the agenda for this week. >> >> Main topics for today's call would have been: >> >> >> Backlog Review: As already explained by Manuel last week, the the backlogs >> of our Enablers (http://backlog.fiware.org) are delivered for review this >> month. Please check that your backlog entries are correct and consistent. I >> have summarized the steps that need to be done in the minutes document. Some >> of the GE already look very good (e.g. GIS Data Provider, RealVirtual >> Interaction). Some others still need some updates, as for example WebTundra. >> More information in the minutes document >> >> Demo for Sprint 4.2.3, Release 4.2: As already addressed in the call last >> week, the current sprint also concludes minor Release 4.2. We should come up >> with a nice demo to demonstrate the features that were implemented in this >> sprint. For this, I am going to set up a Google Doc to collect ideas and >> plan a possible application. >> >> POI-Discussion: As Philipp and Stefan are still travelling, this discussion >> has to be postponed again. But in one of the last meetings, we started to >> consolidate the ideas that were collected in different documents by Oulu and >> DFKI in one joint document. We should continue work on this document, so >> that as soon as everyone is back, we can just go through this document as >> preparation for the discussion >> >> >> >> Best, >> Torsten >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Fiware-webui mailing list >> Fiware-webui at lists.fi-ware.org >> https://lists.fi-ware.org/listinfo/fiware-webui >>
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy